Malposition Rate Research Articles

Cochlear Implant Electrode Misplacement: A Case Series and Contemporary Review.

To determine root causes leading to misplaced cochlear implant (CI) electrode arrays and discuss their management using a case series and contemporary literature review. Retrospective case review and contemporary literature review. Single tertiary-referral center. Adult and pediatric patients who were diagnosed with a misplaced CI electrode array, excluding tip-foldover. Literature review was performed via a MEDLINE database PubMed query. All articles that described at least one case of extracochlear electrode array misplacement were included; partial insertions and extrusions were excluded. Extracochlear misplacement. A total of 61 cases were reviewed, including 4 new cases and 57 cases from 29 previously published articles. We discuss management of CI arrays in the carotid canal, the vestibule, and the modiolus. The rate of CI misplacement is estimated to be 0.49%. The most frequent location of misplacement CI was the vestibular system (50.8%) followed by the internal carotid canal (11.5%). Normal cochlear anatomy was noted on preoperative computer tomography (CT) in 59.0% of patients; abnormalities were noted in 27.9%. The most common technical issue was misidentification or poor visualization of the round window. CI electrode misplacement is rare but can cause postoperative complications and may result in permanently diminished CI performance and hearing outcomes, even after revision surgery. Failure to identify the round window is the most common reason for CI misplacement, despite most patients having normal cochlear anatomy. Surgical strategies to localize the round window and basal turn are imperative for proper electrode placement. 4.

Accuracy and Outcomes of Freehand Thoracic Pedicle Screw Placement using Qi’s Technique

Objective: Many authors have proposed a variety of strategies for freehand thoracic pedicle screw (PS) placement based on identifying ideal entry points and trajectories in the transverse and sagittal planes. This study aimed to assess the accuracy and safety of using a landmark proposed by Qi et al., for determining the entry point and trajectory for freehand thoracic PS placement.Material and Methods: A total of 59 consecutive adult patients who underwent thoracic (T1-T12) PS fixation using Qi’s landmark were enrolled in this retrospective study. Demographic and diagnostic information, adverse events, and postoperative pedicle violation grading were all recorded for analysis. Results: A total of 398 thoracic pedicle screw insertions were analyzed. There were no cases of postoperative neurological deterioration, however two patients required revision surgery to remove a misplaced screws at T6 and T7 due to significant medial wall violation. A total of 360 PSs (90.5%) and 28 PSs (7.0%) were categorized as having high accuracy and low accuracy, respectively. The remaining 10 PSs (2.5%) in the lateral cortex violation group were considered clinically acceptable due to their position in the rib-pedicle unit. The most common location for misplaced screws was the T4 to T8 vertebral region. Conclusion: In terms of accuracy and safety, our findings support using Qi’s technique for freehand thoracic PS placement. The rate of screw misplacement was comparable to that of other techniques. Surgeons should be familiar with the unique anatomy of the mid-thoracic region because it constitutes the most common site of misplaced screws.

Pedicular screw implantation with the surgivisio CBCT navigation system : Malposition rate and risk factors: About 648 screws

Pedicular screw implantation with the surgivisio CBCT navigation system : Malposition rate and risk factors: About 648 screws

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of using percutaneous pedicle screw internal fixation for thoracolumbar fractures.

Thoracolumbar fractures are common in routine injuries. The best way to treat a thoracolumbar fracture is to repair the thoracic fracture with fixation, which is classified into percutaneous pedicle screw fixation and open pedicle screw fixation. The literature was searched in the English database PubMed, Ovid-Medline, Embase, and China Biology Medicine Disc (CBM) from the date of establishment of PubMed to June 2021, and keywords such as percutaneous pedicle screw and posterior percutaneous pedicle screw fixation were searched. A meta-analysis was performed using RevMan5.3, which was provided by Cochrane.com. A total of 9 articles were included. The results showed that the operative time of percutaneous pedicle screw fixation was shorter than that of open pedicle screw fixation. Percutaneous pedicle screw internal fixation had better Cobb angle restoration effect than open pedicle screw internal fixation. However, there were considerable differences in pain and screw misplacement rates. In addition, the pain after percutaneous pedicle screw fixation was smaller than that after open pedicle screw fixation, and patients had better compliance. Compared with open surgery, percutaneous pedicle screw fixation had a shorter operation time, better cobb angle recovery, and a lower pain sensation following surgery. The low rate of screw misplacement and postoperative infection suggested that percutaneous pedicle screw fixation was more effective than open surgery.

A Rationale for Micro-textured Breast Implant Augmentation.

BackgroundTextured breast implants have been used in aesthetic breast surgery to decrease rates of malposition and capsular contracture. Recent concerns regarding breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL)’s link to textured devices have prompted many physicians to reevaluate their use.ObjectivesThe authors aimed to create an algorithm for when to use smooth vs micro-textured breast implants and provide their rationale for when micro-textured implants may be more beneficial.MethodsIn total, 133 patients received primary augmentations performed by a single surgeon from January 2018 to December 2020; 84 patients received smooth implants and 49 patients received micro-textured implants. All surgeries were performed in the dual plane using an inframammary incision. Implant-related complications and scar malposition were recorded and compared between groups.ResultsNo significant difference in the prevalence of implant-related complications was found (3.57% for smooth devices and 2.04% for micro-textured devices [P-value 0.621257; 95% CI −0.06100 to 0.007467]). There were no cases of BIA-ALCL. A comparison of scar malposition rates between the smooth and micro-textured groups also revealed no statistically significant difference (15.4% for smooth devices and 8.16% for micro-textured devices [P-value 0.226156; 95% CI −0.1200 to 0.007467]). Patients in the micro-textured group proportionately had more anatomical risk factors for malposition.ConclusionsMicro-textured breast implants continue to be a safe and effective choice for patients. Micro-textured implants show a trend toward decreased scar malposition, although not statistically significant. Patients at high risk for malposition with micro-textured breast implants give similar results to patients at average risk for malposition with smooth implants.Level of Evidence: 3

Polydioxanone Internal Support Matrix: A Rationale for Prophylactic Internal Bra Support in Breast Augmentation.

BackgroundTextured breast implants have been used in aesthetic breast surgery to decrease the rates of implant malposition. A recent analysis of a large-volume single-surgeon experience found statistically similar rates of malposition in smooth vs micro-textured breast implants.ObjectivesProphylactic use of a polydioxanone (PDO) internal support matrix in breast augmentation was hypothesized to prevent scar malposition and increase pocket control.MethodsIn total, 200 patients received silicone gel primary augmentations performed by a single surgeon from January 2018 to December 2020; 84 patients received smooth implants alone; 49 patients received micro-textured implants; and 67 patients received smooth implants plus PDO internal support matrix. All surgeries were performed in the dual plane using an inframammary incision. Implant-related complications and scar malposition were recorded and compared.ResultsNo significant difference in implant-related complication rates was found between shell types (3.57% for smooth devices alone and 2.04% for textured devices [P = 0.62; 95% CI −0.06 to 0.01]). There were zero complications in the smooth plus mesh study arm. A comparison of scar malposition rates between the smooth alone and textured groups revealed no significant difference (15.4% for smooth devices and 8.16% for textured devices [P = 0.23; 95% CI −0.12 to 0.01]). The smooth implant group with the prophylactic placement of PDO mesh had the lowest scar malposition rate of 4.48%, a significant difference compared with the smooth devices alone (P = 0.03; 95% CI −0.21 to −0.01).ConclusionsMicro-textured devices show a trend toward decreased scar malposition, although not significant. Prophylactic use of PDO internal support matrix in silicone gel breast augmentation is safe and has the lowest incidence of scar malposition.Level of Evidence: 3

Prevention of catheter tip malposition with an ultrasound-guided finger-pressure method to block the internal jugular vein during PICC placement: a meta-analysis.

IntroductionPeripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) are a type of deep venipuncture, for which the catheter tip malposition rate is high.AimTo examine the feasibility of preventing catheter tip malposition during PICC placement using an ultrasound-guided finger-pressure method to block the internal jugular vein.Material and methodsWe conducted a double-blinded randomized controlled trial (RCT) at a tertiary public hospital in Hubei province, China. A total of 600 patients were recruited and randomly allocated to the ultrasound-guided finger compression method (UGFCM) and traditional partial head method (TPHM) group (n = 300/group). Incidence of catheter tip malposition was assessed as the primary outcome of the study. A systematic literature review and meta-analysis was performed. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, China-National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Chinese Biomedicine Database and performed publication bias and sensitivity analyses on 10 extracted studies.ResultsThere were no significant differences in baseline demographic and clinical characteristics between the two groups (p > 0.05). Overall incidence of catheter tip malposition was significantly lower in the UGFCM and TPHM group (1.67% vs. 10.3%) and particularly the incidence of malposition in the internal jugular vein (1% vs. 9%). In the meta-analysis of 10 eligible studies, with 1263 cases using the UGFCM method while 1261 adopted the TPHM method, the results showed that the incidence of catheter tip malposition was significantly lower in the group using the UGFCM method (OR = 0.17, 95% CI: 0.11–0.27, p < 0.01), which is in line with the results of our RCT study.ConclusionsThis study may add valuable evidence on adopting the finger-pressure method for blocking neck veins to reduce the incidence of catheter tip malposition, particularly in the internal jugular vein.

Extra-short humeral heads reduce glenohumeral joint overstuffing compared with short heads in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty.

BackgroundRotator cuff tears and glenoid loosening remain the two most common causes for revision after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. Oversizing of the humeral head leads to increased contact force across the glenohumeral joint and is hypothesized to contribute to clinical and radiographic failure. The purpose of this study is to compare the rate of radiographic overstuffing between standard short humeral heads and newer extra-short heads with decreased lateral offset.MethodsFifty-five consecutive anatomic total shoulder arthroplasties performed using extra-short humeral heads were retrospectively reviewed and compared with age- and sex-matched controls receiving standard short heads. A total of 110 postoperative radiographs were analyzed using the Iannotti's perfect circle method to compare the prosthesis' center of rotation (COR) with the native humeral head COR. A difference in the COR of >3.0 mm was considered malpositioned. Malpositioning medially was considered overstuffed, and malpositioning laterally was considered understuffed. The direction of displacement of malpositioned prostheses was categorized using a quadrant system. Furthermore, we used a novel method to evaluate medial and superior overstuffing by measuring the displacement between the anatomic and prosthetic head positions along perpendicular axes.ResultsUsing the Iannotti's perfect circle method, 56% of heads were malpositioned. Overstuffing occurred more frequently with short heads compared with extra-short heads (47% vs. 4%, P < .001). Conversely, understuffing occurred more frequently with extra-short heads (47% vs. 15%, P = .001). Malpositioned extra-short heads were most frequently placed in the inferomedial quadrant (93% vs. 24%, P < .001), whereas malpositioned short heads were most commonly placed in the superomedial quadrant (56% vs. 7%, P < .001). Our novel measurement method demonstrated that extra-short heads reduced medial overstuffing (2.8 ± 2.8 mm vs. 0.3 ± 2.0 mm, P < .001). Both extra-short and short heads had similar rates of superior malpositioning (1.6 ± 2.2 mm vs. 1.4 ± 1.5 mm, P = .683).ConclusionRoutine use of extra-short humeral head sizes reduces the rate of medial glenohumeral joint overstuffing but not superior malpositioning. This is hypothesized to improve clinical outcomes, but future studies are needed to assess the relationship between improved humeral head fit and clinical outcomes.

A Single Center's Clinical Experience With Ergonomix Breast Implants.

This retrospective study reports on the early experience of a private surgical center with Motiva Ergonomix SilkSurface breast implants. The aim of this study was to examine the incidence of complications and satisfaction levels in women who received primary and revision breast augmentation or augmentation-mastopexy with Ergonomix SilkSurface breast implants. A total of 356 consecutive patients received Ergonomix SilkSurface breast implants between April 2014 and October 2018 by 3 different surgeons and were followed-up for a minimum of 12 months. Complications were assessed by measuring the rate of rupture, capsular contracture, malposition, late seroma, double capsule, reoperation, symmastia, ptosis, extrusion, and infection. Satisfaction with aesthetic results was assessed on a Likert scale by both surgeon and patient. Only 6 major complications were observed in these 356 patients (712 implants): 1 unilateral implant ptosis ("bottoming out") at 12 months (0.14%) and 2 capsular contractures (0.28%), 1 at 14 months and 1 at 2 years. At all time points, 98% of the patients were "extremely satisfied or very satisfied" with the aesthetic results, and the surgeons categorized the outcomes as "very important or important improvement" in 96% of the cases. Motiva Ergonomix SilkSurface devices provided high patient satisfaction up to more than 5 years postoperatively with very few complications. These data are consistent with other reports in the literature. The observed favorable outcomes might be attributed, at least in part, to the bioengineered "cell-friendly" surface of these implants.

Pedicle screw accuracy in thoracolumbar fractures- is routine postoperative CT scan necessary?

BackgroundWhile several studies report on accuracy rates of pedicle screws, risk factors associated with inaccurate pedicle screw positioning in patients with thoracolumbar fractures are reported rarely. CT scan as a routine postoperative control is advocated by various authors, however its necessity remains unclear.MethodsTwo hundred forty-five patients were included in this retrospective study. Percutaneous dorsal instrumentation was most commonly performed (n = 201). Classification of Zdichavsky et al. and Rao et al. were used to classify screw misplacement and anterior perforation was further evaluated according to the extent of perforation (< 2 mm; > 2 mm). Multivariate analysis was performed to identify risk factors for misplacement of screws.ResultsOne thousand sixty-eight pedicle screws were inserted in 245 patients. Misplacement was found in 51 screws (4.8%) in 42 patients (17.1%) according to the classification of Zdichavsky et al. and in 75 screws (7.0%) in 64 patients (26.1%) according to the classification of Rao et al.. An anterior perforation of the vertebral cortex was found in 56 screws (5.2%). Multivariate analysis showed fracture location in the upper thoracic (p = 0.048) and lumbar spine (p = 0.013) to be the only independent predictors for screw misplacement. In addition a significant correlation between pedicle diameter and the occurrence of screw malposition was found (p = 0.003). No consequences were drawn from postoperative routine CT in asymptomatic patients.ConclusionAn overall low rate of screw misplacement was found with fracture location in the upper thoracic and lumbar spine being the only factors independently associated with the risk of screw misplacement. No consequences were drawn from postoperative routine CT in asymptomatic patients. Therefore its use has to be discussed critically.

Dynamic cervical flexion/extension atlantodental interval and functional outcome of the Harms technique for posterior C1/2 fixation: A retrospective analysis of 16 atlantoaxial subluxation cases in a tertiary medical center

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to assess the relationship between the atlantodental interval (ADI) on dynamic flexion/extension cervical radiographs and functional outcomes of posterior spinal fixation by the Harms technique for atlantoaxial subluxation (AAS). Dynamic flexion/extension on cervical radiographs is a standard assessment for evaluation of C1/2 instability in AAS patients. Most studies focused on postoperative ADI and functional outcome, including pain and fusion rate; only few studies compared dynamic ADI change pre- to post-operatively. Material and methodsRetrospectively, we reviewed the medical records of 16 patients who underwent posterior spinal fixation in our center from 2018 to 2019. We used dynamic cervical flexion/extension radiographs to assess the pre- to postoperative change at 12 months in ADI of flexion (ADIf), ADI of extension (ADIe), ADI between flexion/extension (ADIΔ), C1/2 fusion rate and functional outcomes measured by the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association scale (mJOA scale). Postoperative CT at 3∼12 months assessed screw positioning on the Gertzbein and Robbins classification. ResultsIn the 16 patients included in this study, ADIf, ADIe and ADIΔ were significantly reduced, from respectively 8.0mm, 5.0mm and 3.0mm preoperatively to 4.6mm, 3.8mm and 0.8mm at 12 months’ follow-up. The fusion rate was 81% and the mJOA score recovery rate was 34.9±14.7%. Although the screw malposition rate was higher than in other studies in C1(10%) and C2(20%), there were no new neurologic deficits or worsening of symptoms at follow-up. ConclusionsThe ADIΔ showed significant reduction, showing that the Harms technique of posterior spinal fixation can effective in maintaining the stability of the atlantoaxial joint and improving functional outcome.

Usefulness of Preoperative Planning by Three-Dimensional Planning Software for Pedicle Screw Placement in Thoracolumbar Surgeries: Misplacement Rate and Associated Risk Factors.

Introduction A number of imaging technologies have been developed to reduce the risk of pedicle screw (PS) misplacement. For example, preoperative three-dimensional (3D) planning can reportedly enhance implant placement accuracy in some orthopedic surgeries. However, no study has investigated the effect of preoperative 3D planning on PS placement without intraoperative 3D navigation. Thus, in this study, we aim to examine the accuracy of PS placement and identify the risk factors for PS misplacement in thoracolumbar surgeries performed using preoperative 3D planning software with intraoperative fluoroscopic guidance in a retrospective study. Methods In total, 25 consecutive patients (197 PSs) underwent thoracic or lumbar spinal fusion surgeries using preoperative 3D planning with intraoperative fluoroscopic guidance. PS misplacement was graded based on the degree of perforation (Grade 0, no perforation; Grade 1, <2 mm; Grade 2, 2-4 mm; Grade 3, >4 mm) observed in postoperative computed tomography (CT). Deviations between planned and actual PSs were evaluated by matching preoperative and postoperative CT volume images for each vertebra. Results The overall PS misplacement rate was 6.6% (Grade 1: 4.0%, Grade 2: 1.5%, Grade 3: 1.0%). The median linear deviations of PS entry points between planned and actual locations were determined to be 3.3 mm and 3.3 mm for the horizontal and vertical axes, respectively. The median angular deviations of the PS axis were 6.2° and 4.5° for the transverse and sagittal planes, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that horizontal deviation of the PS entry point was the sole factor associated with Grade ≥1 PS misplacement (odds ratio=2.47, p<0.001). Conclusions Preoperative 3D planning software without intraoperative 3D navigation was able to achieve a relatively low PS misplacement ratio among the reported ratio of conventional techniques without navigation. Surgeons should carefully ensure that the entry point is consistent with preoperative planning, especially in the mediolateral direction to avoid misplacement in this method.

Feasibility of the Ultrasound-Guided Insertion of the Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) by the Vascular Surgeon at the Bedside in the Trauma Intensive Care Unit

This study analyzed the outcomes of the ultrasound-guided insertion of the peripherally inserted central venous catheter (PICC) by experienced vascular surgeons at the bedside of the trauma intensive care unit (ICU) and compared the outcomes with those of fluoroscopy-guided PICC performed by radiologists in the interventional suite. Between May 1, 2016, and April 30, 2021, 97 patients who were hospitalized in the trauma ICU and underwent PICC insertion were enrolled in the study. Forty-two out of the 97 patients underwent PICC insertion by interventional radiologists in the interventional radiology suite under fluoroscopy guidance, while the remaining 55 cases underwent ultrasound-guided PICC insertion by the vascular surgeon at the trauma ICU bedside. The technical failure (P=0.504) and malposition (P=0.127) rates were not significantly different between the 2 groups. However, it took significantly less time for the vascular surgeon to complete the PICC insertion procedure (P < 0.001). Significantly more patients of the ultrasound-guided group required inotropes (P=0.012) and mechanical ventilation (P=0.003) at the time of the procedure. In addition, the ultrasound-guided group appeared to be in critical condition in terms of kidney function according to laboratory data (P=0.014). Meanwhile, the ultrasound-guided group maintained the central line catheter for a shorter time (P < 0.001). In trauma patients, ultrasound-guided PICC insertion at the bedside by experienced vascular surgeons at the trauma ICU was feasible compared to fluoroscopy-guided insertion performed by interventional radiologists.

Rate of Tibial Tunnel Malposition Is Not Changed by Drilling Entirely Within the Stump of Preserved Remnants During ACL Reconstruction: A Prospective Comparative 3D-CT Study.

Background:Remnant preservation during anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) is controversial, and it is unclear whether the stump aids or obscures tibial tunnel positioning.Purpose/Hypothesis:The aim of this study was to determine whether the rate of tibial tunnel malposition is influenced by remnant preservation. The hypothesis was that using a remnant-preserving technique to drill entirely within the tibial stump would result in a significant reduction in tibial tunnel malposition as determined by postoperative 3-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT).Study Design:Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.Methods:Patients undergoing ACLR between October 2018 and December 2019 underwent surgery with a remnant-preserving technique (RP group) if they had a large stump present (>50% of the native ACL length) or if there was no remnant or if it was <50% of the native length of the ACL, they underwent remnant ablation (RA group) and use of standard landmarks for tunnel positioning. The postoperative tunnel location was reported as a percentage of the overall anteroposterior (AP) and mediolateral (ML) dimensions of the tibia on axial 3D-CT. The tunnel was classified as anatomically placed if the center lay between 30% and 55% of the AP length and between 40% and 51% of the ML length.Results:Overall, 52 patients were included in the study (26 in each group). The mean tunnel positions were 36.8% ± 5.5% AP and 46.7% ± 2.9% ML in the RP group and 35.6% ± 4.8% AP and 47.3% ± 2.3% ML in the RA group. There were no significant differences in the mean AP (P = .134) and ML (P = .098) tunnel positions between the groups. Inter- and intraobserver reliability varied between fair to excellent and good to excellent, respectively. There was no significant difference in the rate of malposition between groups (RP group, 7.7%; RA group, 11.5%; P ≥ .999).Conclusion:Drilling entirely within the ACL tibial stump using a remnant-preserving reconstruction technique did not significantly change the rate of tunnel malposition when compared with stump ablation and utilization of standard landmarks.

Utility of image-guided external ventriculostomy: analysis of contemporary practice in the United Kingdom and Ireland.

Freehand external ventricular drain (EVD) insertion is associated with a high rate of catheter misplacement. Image-guided EVD placement with neuronavigation or ultrasound has been proposed as a safer, more accurate alternative with potential to facilitate proper placement and reduce catheter malfunction risk. This study aimed to determine the impact of image-guided EVD placement on catheter tip position and drain functionality. This study is a secondary analysis of a data set from a prospective, multicenter study. Data were collated for EVD placements undertaken in the United Kingdom and Ireland from November 2014 to April 2015. In total, 21 large tertiary care academic medical centers were included. Over the study period, 632 EVDs were inserted and 65.9% had tips lying free-floating in the CSF. Only 19.6% of insertions took place under image guidance. The use of image guidance did not significantly improve the position of the catheter tip on postoperative imaging, even when stratified by ventricular size. There was also no association between navigation use and drain blockage. Image-guided EVD placement was not associated with an increased likelihood of achieving optimal catheter position or with a lower rate of catheter blockage. Educational efforts should aim to enhance surgeons' ability to apply the technique correctly in cases of disturbed cerebral anatomy or small ventricles to reduce procedural risks and facilitate effective catheter positioning.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in degenerated surgical aortic valves.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) within failed bioprosthetic surgical aortic valves (valve-in-valve TAVI) has become an established procedure, currently approved for patients deemed at high risk for repeat aortic valve intervention. Although less invasive than surgical reoperation, challenges of valve-in-valve treatment include higher rates of malposition, prosthesis-patient mismatch and coronary obstruction. Thus, optimal patient selection and preprocedural planning is of the utmost importance to minimise the risk of these complications. In this review article we provide a fully illustrated overview of the most significant periprocedural operative considerations for valve-in-valve TAVI.

Incidence and Risk Factors for a Malpositioned Intrauterine Device Detected on Three-Dimensional Ultrasound Within Eight Weeks of Placement.

To estimate the incidence of intrauterine device (IUD) malpositioning detected on three-dimensional (3D) transvaginal ultrasound within 8 weeks of placement and identify risk factors for malpositioning. Retrospective study of women who had an IUD placed at a large obstetrics and gynecology practice from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2020. All patients underwent two-dimensional ultrasound at the time of insertion and routine three-dimensional ultrasound within 8 weeks. Baseline characteristics and potential risk factors were compared between women with correctly positioned and malpositioned IUDs. Odds ratios were calculated by logistic regression to identify risk factors independently associated with malpositioning. A total of 763 IUD placements were included, and 127 malpositioned IUDs were identified representing an overall rate of malpositioning of 16.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 14.0-19.3) with 8.8% (95% CI 6.8-10.8) requiring removal. Patients with malpositioned IUD had higher rates of morbid obesity (13.4% versus 3.8%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.46, 95% CI 1.10-5.50), prior uterine window or rupture (9.0% versus 2.2%, aOR 2.78, 95% CI 1.06-7.30), copper IUD placement (64.2% versus 47.4%, aOR 1.99, 95% CI 1.31-3.03), and symptoms such as bleeding or pain at follow-up (35.8% versus 20.1%, aOR 2.58, 95% CI 1.67-3.98). Parity, breastfeeding, difficult insertion, and uterine size and positioning were not significant. The incidence of malpositioned IUD within 8 weeks of placement on 3D ultrasound is 16.6%, with 8.8% requiring removal. Significant risk factors for malpositioning include morbid obesity, prior uterine window or rupture, and copper IUD placement. These findings support the importance of routine follow-up 3D ultrasound after seemingly successful IUD placement.

Comparison of Outcomes between Percutaneous and Surgical Placement of Peritoneal Dialysis Catheters in Uremic Patients: A Meta-Analysis

Background: The optimal technique for inserting peritoneal dialysis catheters in uremic patients remains debated. This meta-analysis aimed to summarize the current evidence evaluating the efficacy and safety of percutaneous insertion methods compared to surgical methods. Method: A literature search was performed in the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases. The primary outcome was defined as catheter survival. The secondary outcomes were mechanical and infectious complications related to catheter insertion. Results: Twenty studies were finally identified, including 2 randomized controlled trials. The pooled results of catheter survival, overall mechanical complications, and infectious complications were not significant (odds ratio [OR] = 1.10, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.76–1.57, p = 0.62; OR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.48–1.11, p = 0.14; and OR = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.37–1.09, p = 0.14, respectively). Comparison stratified by the blind percutaneous method versus open surgery indicated a lower overall number of mechanical complications (OR = 0.54, 95% CI = 0.31–0.93, I² = 72%) and malposition rate (OR = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.34–0.90, I² = 0%). The leakage rate was higher in the blind percutaneous group than in the open surgery group (OR = 2.55, 95% CI = 1.72–3.79, I² = 0%); the guided percutaneous method achieved a similar leakage risk to the surgical methods. Conclusions: The blind percutaneous method performed better with fewer overall mechanical complications and less malposition than open surgery. The leakage risk was higher in the blind percutaneous group, while the guided percutaneous placement group showed similar outcomes to the surgical method groups. Percutaneous methods also had a lower infection risk, which needs further evidence to be confirmed.

Does 3D-Assisted Operative Treatment of Pelvic Ring Injuries Improve Patient Outcome?-A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Background: There has been an exponential growth in the use of advanced technologies for three-dimensional (3D) virtual pre- and intra-operative planning of pelvic ring injury surgery but potential benefits remain unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate differences in intra- and post-operative results between 3D and conventional (2D) surgery. Methods: A systematic review was performed including published studies between 1 January 2010 and 22 May 2020 on all available 3D techniques in pelvic ring injury surgery. Studies were assessed for their methodological quality according to the Modified McMaster Critical Review form. Differences in operation time, blood loss, fluoroscopy time, screw malposition rate, fracture reduction and functional outcome between 3D-assisted and conventional (2D) pelvic injury treatment were evaluated and a best-evidence synthesis was performed. Results: Eighteen studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria, evaluating a total of 988 patients. Overall quality was moderate. Regarding intra-operative results of 3D-assisted versus conventional surgery: The weighted mean operation time per screw was 43 min versus 52 min; for overall operation time 126 min versus 141 min; blood loss 275 ± 197 mL versus 549 ± 404 mL; fluoroscopy time 74 s versus 125 s and fluoroscopy frequency 29 ± 4 versus 63 ± 3. In terms of post-operative outcomes of 3D-assisted versus conventional surgery: weighted mean screw malposition rate was 8% versus 18%; quality of fracture reduction measured by the total excellent/good rate by Matta was 86% versus 82% and Majeed excellent/good rate 88% versus 83%. Conclusion: The 3D-assisted surgery technologies seem to have a positive effect on operation time, blood loss, fluoroscopy dose, time and frequency as well as accuracy of screw placement. No improvement in clinical outcome in terms of fracture reduction and functional outcome has been established so far. Due to a wide range of methodological quality and heterogeneity between the included studies, results should be interpreted with caution.

Simulation on synthetic bone: A tool for teaching thoracolumbar pedicle screw placement

IntroductionSimulation workshops for surgical training of residents are becoming popular. The gold standard for teaching thoracolumbar pedicle screw placement are cadaver labs; however, the availability of human bodies is limited. The primary objective of this study was to determine if training on a synthetic bone model improves the apprenticeship of accurate pedicle screw placement. The secondary objective was to check the influence of residents’ previous experience in spine surgery. HypothesisThe main hypothesis was that theoretical learning with practical application on synthetic bone was superior to theoretical learning alone. MethodsTwenty-three orthopedic residents were taught about free-hand pedicle screw placement using a theoretical presentation. Six residents had previous experience with screwing techniques. After randomization in two groups, 11 residents (group 1) participated in a workshop on synthetic bone, whereas 12 residents received only theoretical instruction (group 2). Each resident was asked to place two thoracic screws (T7-T11) and two lumbar screws (L1-L5) on a cadaver. Screw placement accuracy was analyzed using the Gertzbein classification on computed tomography (grades 0 and 1=accurate positioning; grades 2 and 3=malposition>2mm). ResultsRates of accurate screw positioning were 64.0% and 62.5% for thoracic levels, and 72.7% and 66.6% for lumbar levels in group 1 and 2, respectively. There was no significant difference in malposition rates on cadavers between the groups (p=0.1809). A resident who was first trained by simulation had a chance of decreasing the Gertzbein score with an odds-ratio of 1.7714 [0.7710–4.1515]. The odds ratio was 4.5188 [0.0456–0.8451] when comparing residents with previous experience in spinal surgery to novice residents. DiscussionTheoretical teaching associated with a simulation model is relevant for learning a surgical technique. A single simulation workshop on synthetic bone seems insufficient to improve pedicle screw placement accuracy compared to theoretical teaching alone. Progressive experience and the repetition of technical gestures during hands-on supervised learning in spine surgery with a senior surgeon had an influence on the accuracy of pedicle screw placement. Level of evidenceII.