Rate Of Loosening Research Articles

Patella component diameters of 38 mm and up might be associated with higher revision rates after patella resurfacing

PurposePatellar resurfacing is considered the standard of care for total knee arthroplasty in the USA. Complications of patella resurfacing include aseptic loosening or patella fractures and can threaten the integrity of the extensor mechanism. The goal of this study was to report on patella button revision rates in posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty.Material and methodsBetween 01/2010 and 08/2016 patella buttons were implanted in 1056 patients (267 men and 550 women) as part of a posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty.ResultsOf 1056 cases, 35 cases (14 women, 15 men, 5 bilateral, 3.3%) showed early loosening at a mean 52.5 months postoperatively. Patella components of 38 mm or larger diameters showed a significantly higher loosening rate than the 29, 32, 35 mm buttons (p < 0.01). Mean BMI of patients identified with aseptic loosening was 31.7 kg/m2, mean age at time of revision surgery was 63.3 years. All of the patients with loosening of the patella button required revision surgery; in 33 cases an exchange of the button was performed, in two cases a removal of the button and patellar bone grafting was indicated. No complications occurred after revision surgery.ConclusionThe current study reports a 3.3% patella loosening rate during this mid-term follow-up. Size 38 mm and larger patella components showed a significantly higher revision rate than smaller buttons and the authors advise caution when using large diameter patella components.

A Study of Tibial Cyst Formation in Modular Stemmed Total Ankle Arthroplasty: Exploring a Possible Relationship to Smooth and Porous Coating on the Stem Segments

Vertical fixation through stemmed components has been a successful strategy in total ankle arthroplasty. Research in hip replacement surgery has demonstrated increased rates of stress shielding, aseptic loosening, thigh pain, and cystic formation around stemmed femoral implants extensively coated with porous surfaces. While some ankle prostheses have integrated porous coating technology with stemmed tibial implants, there is little to no research investigating the potential negative effects of bone bonding to the tibial stems and possible impact on tibial cyst formation. We performed a retrospective cohort study comparing the incidence of periprosthetic tibial cyst formation in smooth versus fully porous-coated stemmed tibial implants after undergoing total ankle implant arthroplasty. Radiographs were compared for postoperative rates of tibial cyst formation and bone bonding to the tibial stems. Relative risk for reoperation between the smooth and porous-coated implants was investigated. The smooth-stem group showed no incidence of tibial cyst formation nor signs of significant bone bonding to the tibial stems; however, the follow-up matched porous-coated group showed a rate of 63% of cystic formation with associated evidence of bone bonding on final radiographic follow-up (p < .01). Relative risk for reoperation was 0.74. Despite a higher incidence of tibial cyst formation in the stemmed ankle arthroplasty groups with porous coating, reoperation rates were similar. We theorize that the proximal bonding to the porous stem surface could impact the distal stems and result in the observed increase in cyst formation.

Hormone Replacement Therapy Does Not Eliminate Risk Factors for Joint Complications following Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Matched Cohort Study

Aging causes a reduction in testosterone and estrogen, which is linked to diminished bone mineral density. Hormone replacement therapy and its effect on the outcome of joint arthroplasties is unclear. The purpose of this study was to analyze the impact of testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) and estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) on the medical and joint outcomes of total hip (THA) and total knee arthroplasties (TKA). A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the PearlDiver database. Patients who received TRT or ERT perioperatively were matched to controls. Rates of 90-day medical complications and 2-year joint complications were queried. Patients who received TRT had an increased risk of revision, periprosthetic joint infection, and pooled joint complications within 2 years following a THA and increased rates of septic and aseptic revisions, and aseptic loosening after TKA compared to the control cohort. Patients receiving ERT had increased rates of aseptic loosening and pooled joint complications within 2 years following THA and increased rates of all-cause revisions and pooled joint complications after TKA. Patients who received TRT demonstrated significantly higher rates of revision rates and PJI. Patients who received perioperative ERT were significantly more likely to have increased risks of revision rates and joint infections.

Tantalum Cementless Versus Cemented Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-analysis of Level 1 Studies

Controversy exists on the ideal type of fixation in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Noncemented fixation has been theorized to improve patient outcomes and longevity of implantation without increased risk of aseptic loosening or radiolucent lines. We sought to compare (1) patient-reported outcomes, (2) survivorship, and (3) revision rates for all-cause and aseptic loosening in a noncemented tantalum total knee with its cemented counterpart. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses guidelines were searched using a combination of keywords "trabecular metal," "tantalum knee," "total knee arthroplasty," and "cementless trabecular." Patient demographics such as age, sex, and body mass index were collected. Outcomes such as Knee Society Scores (KSSs), revisions, and radiolucent lines were recorded for analysis. Four randomized controlled trials involving 507 patients with an average 5-year follow-up were eligible for meta-analysis. No differences were observed in any demographics such as age, sex, body mass index, nor preoperative KSS. Patients in the cemented cohort improved from preoperative KSS 46.4 to postoperative KSS 90.4 while the tantalum cohort improved from 46.4 to 89.3. No statistical difference was observed in postoperative KSS mean difference between groups. Six patients from the tantalum group underwent revision with one patient for aseptic loosening. Twelve patients from the cemented group underwent revision with four patients for aseptic loosening. No statistical difference was observed between rates of revision, aseptic loosening, or radiolucent line development. Patient-reported outcomes improved postoperatively in both groups. No differences were detected between the cemented and noncemented TKAs in patient-reported outcomes, revision rates, or radiolucent line development. Noncemented tantalum fixation seems equivalent to cemented TKA survivorship. Longer term follow-up of these randomized controlled trials may provide a clearer understanding whether a difference exists.

Midline Lumbar Fusion Versus Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Involving L5-S1 For Degenerative Lumbar Diseases: A Comparative Study.

A retrospective cohort study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of midline lumbar fusion (MIDLF) for lumbosacral fusion compared to posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). Patients who had undergone posterior lumbosacral fusion surgery were divided into a MIDLF group (n=37) and a PLIF group (n=42). The follow-up time was at least 12months. The operation data, recovery condition, complications, clinical outcomes, and status of implants and fusion were compared between the 2 groups. The MIDLF group experienced significantly less blood loss, lower postoperative creatine kinase levels and total drainage volume, earlier time to ambulation, and less hospital stay times after surgery compared to the PLIF group (P<0.05). The mean postoperative back pain visual analog scale scores in the MIDLF group were significantly lower than the PLIF group (P<0.05). The improvement in Oswestry Disability Index scores during 3-month follow-up displayed a significant difference between the 2 groups (P < 0.05). The fusion rate tended to be higher in the MIDLF group; however, the difference was not significant (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in respect to screw loosening and cage subsidence rate. There were 2 cases of complications both occurring in the PLIF group. MIDLF is safe and effective for lumbosacral fusion and in line with the concept of enhanced recovery after surgery.

Comparison of Cortical Bone Trajectory to Pedicle-Based Dynamic Stabilization: An Analysis of 291 Patients.

Pedicle-based dynamic stabilization (DS) has gained popularity outside of America. Although pedicle screw (PS) loosening has always been a concern, it is reportedly innocuous. Cortical bone trajectory (CBT) screw is an emerging option with less invasiveness and similar effectiveness to PS in short-segment lumbar fusion. This study aimed to verify the use of CBT for DS by comparing the outcomes between pedicle- and CBT-based DS. Consecutive patients with lumbar spondylosis or low-grade spondylolisthesis who underwent 1- or 2-level DS between L3-5 with a minimum follow-up of 24 months were reviewed. Screw loosening was determined by computed tomography and the incidences were compared. A total of 291 patients who underwent Dynesys DS (235 pedicle- and 56 CBT-based, respectively) were compared. The demographics and preoperative conditions were similar. All the clinical outcomes improved at 24-month postoperation, while the CBT-based group had less operation time and blood loss than the pedicle-based group. The rates of screw loosening were lower in the CBT-based (5.4% per screw and 12.5% per patient) than the pedicle-based group (9% per screw and 26.4% per patient). Furthermore, there were no differences in the clinical outcomes and complication profiles. The CBT-based DS for 1- or 2-level lumbar degeneration demonstrated equivalent clinical improvement as the pedicle-based DS. The adaption of CBT-based screws for DS could be a less invasive approach (shorter operation time and less blood loss), with lower chances of screw loosening than the conventional PS-based DS.

Offset Acetabular Liners: Safer Than Previously Thought.

High offset liners help to restore soft tissue tension after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, prior research has reported increased rates of aseptic loosening when using offset components. The purpose of this study was to examine the postoperative complication and revision rates of neutral vs offset acetabular liners at our institution. Two hundred eight primary THAs in 206 patients performed between 2016 and 2018 using neutral or offset liners were reviewed. All patients had a minimum 2-year clinical follow-up (mean, 3.3 years; range, 2.0-5.7 years). Postoperative complications and revision surgeries were reviewed. All offset liners were 4 mm in thickness. Twelve (10.0%) complications occurred in the neutral liner group, and 13 (14.8%) complications occurred in the offset liner group. Two cases of aseptic loosening occurred in the neutral liner group, with no cases reported in the offset liner group. Nine cases (7.5%) in the neutral group required revision surgery, whereas 3 cases in the offset group required revision surgery. Chi-square analysis found no difference between the groups in the rate of postoperative complications, χ2 (1, N=208)=1.09 (P>.05), or the rate of revision, χ2 (1, N=208)=1.56 (P>.05). We found no significant differences between the neutral and offset groups regarding the rates of postoperative complications, aseptic loosening, or revision surgery. Our findings suggest that contemporary high offset liners, up to 4 mm, are safe and effective when attempting to restore native hip mechanics after THA. [Orthopedics. 2023;46(5):e298-e302.].

The Effect of Body Mass Index on the Relative Revision Rates of Cemented and Cementless Unicompartmental Knee Replacements: An Analysis of Over 10,000 Knee Replacements from National Databases.

Unicompartmental knee replacements (UKRs) are being performed in an increasingly overweight population. There are concerns that cemented fixation will not last. Cementless fixation may offer a solution, but the relative performance in different body mass index (BMI) groups remains unknown. Ten thousand, four hundred and forty cemented and cementless UKRs were propensity matched. Patients were stratified into 4 BMI groups: underweight (<18.5 kg/m 2 ), normal weight (18.5 to <25 kg/m 2 ), overweight (25 to <30 kg/m 2 ), and obese (≥30 kg/m 2 ). The effect of BMI on the relative performance of UKR fixation groups was studied. Cox regression was used to compare revision and reoperation rates. The revision rate per 100 component-years significantly increased (p < 0.001) with BMI for the cemented UKRs. Revision rates per 100 component-years for the normal, overweight, and obese groups were 0.92 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.91 to 0.93), 1.15 (95% CI, 1.14 to 1.16), and 1.31 (95% CI, 1.30 to 1.33), respectively. This was not observed for the cementless UKR, with revision rates of 1.09 (95% CI, 1.08 to 1.11), 0.70 (95% CI, 0.68 to 0.71), and 0.96 (95% CI, 0.95 to 0.97), respectively. The 10-year implant survival rates for the matched cemented and cementless UKRs in the normal, overweight, and obese groups were 93.8% (95% CI, 89.1% to 96.5%) and 94.3% (95% CI, 90.9% to 96.5%) (hazard ratio [HR], 1.17; p = 0.63), 88.5% (95% CI, 84.2% to 91.7%) and 93.8% (95% CI, 90.2% to 96.2%) (HR, 0.61; p = 0.005), and 90.7% (95% CI, 88.2% to 92.6%) and 91.8% (95% CI, 88.9% to 94.0%) (HR, 0.74; p = 0.02), respectively. There were insufficient numbers in the underweight group for analysis (n = 13). Obese patients had less than half the rates of aseptic loosening (0.46% vs. 1.31%; p = 0.001) and pain (0.60% vs. 1.20%; p = 0.02) in the cementless group as compared with the cemented group. Higher-BMI groups had higher revision rates for the cemented UKRs but not for the cementless UKRs. Cementless fixation was associated with reduced long-term revision rates compared with cement fixation in the overweight and obese groups. In the obese group, the rates of aseptic loosening and pain were at least 50% lower in the cementless UKR group. Prognostic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Is hybrid fixation in revision TKA using LCCK prostheses reliable?

IntroductionThe optimal technique for component fixation in revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) remains controversial: full cementation (FC) versus hybrid fixation (HF), which involves press-fit stem with cement fixation in the metaphyseal and epiphyseal zones. Previous series have either demonstrated the superiority of one or the other of these techniques or their equivalence. However, few studies have compared these 2 methods for rTKA using the Legacy® Constrained Condylar Knee (LCCK) prosthesis (Zimmer, Warsaw, Indiana, USA). HypothesisOur hypothesis was that HF of LCCK components is associated with a higher rate of aseptic loosening (AL) than FC. Materials and methodsThis was a single-center, multi-surgeon, retrospective study. Primary revisions between January 2010 and December 2014 were included for all indications. The only exclusion criterion was death without revision before the 5-year follow-up. The primary objective of this study was to compare the survivorship of 2 groups of LCCK components (femoral or tibial), depending on whether their stems had been cemented (HF versus FC), taking AL, revised or not, as the endpoint. The secondary objective was to look for other predictive factors of AL. ResultsA total of 75 rTKAs (150 components) were included. The FC group (51 components) had more Anderson Orthopedic Research Institute (AORI) type 2B and type 3 bone defects (BDs) (p<0.001), more reconstructions using trabecular metal (TM) cones (19 FCs and 5 HFs; p<0.001), and bone allografts (p<0.001). At more than 5 years, none of the FC components were loose compared to 10 HF components (9.4%), with 4 of these stems revised. The only significant difference was survivorship without radiographic AL at 9 years (FC=100%; HF=78.6%; p=0.04). The only predictive factor of AL in the HF group was the filling of the diaphyseal canal (p<0.01). The detrimental effect of BD severity (p=0.78) and the protective effect of TM cones were not demonstrated (p=0.21). DiscussionOther series studying revisions using the same type of prosthesis also concluded the superiority of FC, not found for other revision prostheses. Despite this study's limitations (retrospective, multi-surgeon, limited sample size, and limited follow-up), all patient outcomes were known, and the difference in survivorship between the groups was very significant. ConclusionHF has not been proven effective for the LCCK prosthesis. Better diaphyseal filling, wider metaphyseal bone tunnels enabling better cement injections, and stem designs more appropriate for press-fit fixation could improve these results. TM cones are an interesting avenue for further research. Level of evidenceIII; retrospective comparative study.

Efficacy comparison of antibiotic bone cement–coated implants and external fixations for treating infected bone defects

PurposeThis study aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy of antibiotic bone cement–coated implants compared with external fixations for treating infected bone defects.MethodsWe retrospectively enrolled 119 patients with infected bone defects in our hospital from January 2010 to June 2021, of which 56 were treated with antibiotic bone cement–coated implants and 63 were with external fixation.ResultsThe pre-operative and post-operative haematological indexes were tested to assess the infection control; the post-operative CRP level in the internal fixation group was lower than that in the external fixation group. No statistical significance was found in the rate of infection recurrence, loosening and rupture of the fixation, and amputation between the two groups. Twelve patients in the external fixation group had pin tract infection. In the evaluation of the Paley score scale, bone healing aspect revealed no significant difference between the two groups, while in the limb function aspect, antibiotic cement–coated implant group showed a much better score than the external fixation group (P = 0.002). The anxiety evaluation scale result also showed lower score in the antibiotic cement implant group (P < 0.001).ConclusionsCompared with external fixation, antibiotic bone cement–coated implant had the same effect on controlling infection and was more effective in recovering limb function and mental health in the first-stage treatment of infected bone defects after debridement.

Notching of smooth ulnar stems reduces loosening after total elbow arthroplasty

Background This study aimed to validate the concept of notching of the ulna component of the first-generation latitude total elbow prosthesis to reduce the rate of aseptic loosening and improve implant survival. Methods A total of 18 total elbow arthroplasty cases were performed between June 2001 and May 2002 using the latitude first-generation ulnar stem. A total of 14 cases with at least 2 years of follow-up were evaluated following the exclusion of four infected cases. The senior author roughened the stem surface with notches in 10 cases (notched group) to prevent loosening. The effects of notching on implant failure were retrospectively analyzed. Results Average participant age and follow-up were 56 ± 20 years and 72 ± 44 months, respectively. The notched and unnotched implant groups were demographically equivalent. 3/4(75%) of unnotched group implants failed due to aseptic loosening. 1/10(10%) of the notched group implants failed. All unnotched group aseptic loosening cases occurred at the bone–cement interface within 2 years after total elbow arthroplasty. The single patient with aseptic loosening in the notched group had a history of multiple surgeries due to an open fracture preceding the primary total elbow arthroplasty. Discussion Notching of the ulna component of the first-generation latitude total elbow prosthesis reduced the rate of aseptic loosening and improved implant survival. Level of evidence Level IV, retrospective comparative study.

Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty with inlay glenoid component: A systematic review.

A total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) system utilizing an inlay glenoid component has been proposed as a means of reducing glenoid component loosening while still providing patients with desirable functional and clinical outcomes. The purpose of this study was to systematically review current outcomes literature on TSA using an inlay glenoid component. A literature search was conducted using PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Web of Science databases. Studies comparing pre- and postoperative functional and clinical outcomes were included. Five studies with 148 shoulders (133 patients) were included. Patient-reported outcomes improved, including the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (mean change 34.1 to 80.6), Penn Shoulder Score (mean change 43.3 to 85.5), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score (mean change 34.1 to 80.6), and visual analog scale-pain (mean change 6.9 to 1.6). Range of motion improved for forward elevation (mean change 109.6 to 156.2) and external rotation (mean change 21.5 to 50.8). Glenoid component loosening occurred in one shoulder (0.68%). Two revision surgeries (1.35%) were performed. The use of an inlay glenoid component is associated with improvements in postoperative pain, function, and satisfaction while minimizing rates of glenoid component loosening and the need for revision surgery over short-term follow-up. systematic review, level IV.

Uncemented total hip replacement with impaction bone grafting in protrusio acetabuli

Protrusio acetabuli is a central acetabular defect resulting from migration of femoral head medial to Kohler’s line. Idiopathic central displacement of femoral head within the acetabulum is quite rare. However, it may be seen in arthritic hips secondary to rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, previous trauma, osteomalacia, etc. Primary Total Hip Replacement (THR) in such cases is difficult because of the deficient medial bone, decreased peripheral bony support to the acetabular component and proximal and medial migration of the joint centre. Several techniques described previously in the surgical management of protrusio acetabuli include cemented acetabular components with cement alone or in association with morselized bone graft to reconstruct the acetabulum. However, cement has high rates of migration and loosening of cemented acetabular components in young patients leads to more revision surgeries within the first decade of implantation. The purpose of the study is to describe the technique and results of using impacted morselized bone graft with a porous coated cementless acetabular component in patients with protrusio acetabuli.A total of 20 primary THR’s (10 unilateral and 5 bilateral) in 15 patients (8 females and 7 males) with protrusio acetabuli were performed between 2018 and 2021, out of which 4 had mild,7 had moderate and 9 had a severe grade of protrusion. A total of 10 hips were affected by rheumatoid arthritis,3 by ankylosing spondylitis and 7 had unknown etiology. After the surgery, all bone grafts had united by the sixth month with no perceptible change in acetabular component position in any case. The mean preoperative Harris Hip Score was 48 which improved to 82 at the latest follow-up. 45% had excellent,33% had good, and 22% had fair results. There was no dislocation. The use of impacted morselized autograft with a cementless porous acetabular component is a good technique of restoration of hip biomechanics and sound fixation in cases of protrusio acetabuli.

Early radiographic osseointegration of a novel highly porous 3D-printed titanium collar for megaprostheses compared to a previous generation smooth HA-coated collar

PurposeExtracortical osseointegration at the collar-bone interface of megaprostheses is associated with improved implant stability, lower rates of stem fracture and loosening. The use of hydroxy-apatite (HA-) coated collars showed mixed results in previously published reports. A novel collar system has recently become available utilizing additive manufacturing technology to create a highly porous titanium collar with a calcium-phosphate coated surface. The aim of this study was to evaluate our early experience with this novel collar and compare it to the previously used HA-coated model.MethodsTwenty patients who underwent megaprostheses implantation utilizing the novel collar system were case matched to 20 patients who had previously undergone a HA-coated collar. A minimum radiological follow-up of three months was available in all included patients. Osseointegration was evaluated using postoperative plain radiographs in two planes based on a previously published semi-quantitative score.ResultsCompared to the HA-coated collar the use of the novel highly porous collar was associated with a higher proportion of cases demonstrating osseointegration at the bone-collar interface (80% vs. 65%). Application of the highly porous collar led to a significantly shortened time to reach the final ongrowth score (173 ± 89 days vs. 299 ± 165 days, p < 0.05). At one year follow-up, 90% of the novel collars had reached their final osseoingration grade compared to 50% in the HA-coated collar group (p < 0.001). Radiological osseointegration was seen in 71% for highly porous collars where the indication was revision arthroplasty, compared to 27% in reported in the literature. ConclusionThese results indicate more reliable and accelerated osseointegration at the bone-collar interface of a novel highly porous collar system compared to a previously used HA-coated collar. Further studies are warranted to confirm these findings.

Anatomic Shoulder Arthroplasty in the Setting of Concurrent or Prior Rotator Cuff Repair: A Systematic Review.

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is the gold standard in management of osteoarthritis (OA) in the setting of rotator cuff pathology. However, there are significant complications associated with the procedure. An alternative option in the setting of a deficient rotator cuff may be to perform a repair prior to or concurrently with an anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA). A systematic review was performed utilizing Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to evaluate outcomes in aTSA with concomitant or prior rotator cuff repair (RCR). Key outcomes were complication rate and subjective outcome scores. Seven studies were included in the review. One study found a higher rate of total adverse events in the prior repair group (17% vs 7%, P = .01) while others found no significant difference. There was a nonstatistically significant increase in revision rates among patients with larger tears at time of repair. Prior repair groups were associated with a higher rate of re-tear in one study (13% vs 1%, P = .014). Concomitant repair was associated with a higher rate of loosening. In patients with prior repair, there was no statistical difference in strength, range of motion (ROM), simple shoulder test (SST), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES), and visual analogue scale (VAS). In patients with concurrent repair, one study demonstrated a less drastic improvement in Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) in "moderate" repairs as opposed to "good" repairs. Anatomic TSA is an appropriate treatment for glenohumeral OA in patients with a prior successful RCR and in younger patients with concurrent repair of small or medium tears. Level III.

USO DE TERIPARATIDA NO PLANEJAMENTO CIRÚRGICO DE PACIENTE COM OSTEOPOROSE

ABSTRACT Currently, there are no guidelines for treating osteoporosis in spinal surgery. The rate of complications such as screw loosening, proximal junction kyphosis, cage subsidence, and loss of reduction in fractures is high. Objective: To evaluate the use of teriparatide and denosumab in planning spinal surgery in an osteoporotic patient with degenerative pathology, emphasizing the fusion rate, bone mineral density, and decreased complications. Method: A systematic search was performed in medical reference databases for comparative studies of teriparatide and denosumab in spinal surgery to evaluate fusion, screw loosening, bone mineral density, and decrease in the incidence of vertebral fractures. χ2 was implemented for the statistical analysis, according to PRISMA (2020). Result: Fusion rate with teriparatide was 79.28% in the first six months, 95% CI (OR 2.62) and decreased screw loosening rate 81.9% 95% CI (OR 0.6). Increase in bone mineral density 15.5% OR 1.49 (0.77 - 2.86) and decrease in vertebral fracture rate 85.4% OR 0.5. Conclusions: Teriparatide and denosumab should be considered in perioperative spinal planning due to their effectiveness, synergism, and low adverse effects; to improve bone mineral density and decrease the rate of complications. Clinical, comparative, and statistically significant studies are required to confirm this. Level of Evidence II; Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

LUMiC® endoprosthesis for pelvic reconstruction: A Canadian experience.

The LUMiC® prosthesis was introduced to reduce the mechanical complications encountered with periacetabular reconstruction after pelvic tumor resection. Few have evaluated the outcomes associated with its use. A retrospective study from five Orthopedic Oncology Canadian centers was conducted. All patients with a LUMiC® endoprosthesis were included. Their charts were reviewed for surgical and functional outcomes. A total of 16 patients were followed for 28 months (3-60). A total of 12 patients (75%) had a LUMiC® after a resection of a primary sarcoma. Mean surgical time was 555 min. Four patients (25%) had a two-stages procedure. MSTS score was 60.3 preoperatively and 54.3 postoperatively. Patients got a dual mobility bearing and the silver coated implant was used in 7 patients (43.7%). Five patients (31.3%) underwent capsular reconstruction using a fabric. Silver-coating was not found to reduce infection risk (p = 0.61) and capsuloplasty did not prevent dislocation (p = 0.6). Five patients had peroperative complications (31.3%). Eight patients (50%) had an infection including all four with two-stages surgery. Dislocation occurred in five patients (31.3%) whereas no cases of aseptic loosening were reported. A total of 10 patients (62.5%) needed a reoperation. LUMiC® endoprosthesis provides low rates of aseptic loosening on medium-term follow-up. Infection and dislocation are common complications but we were unable to show benefits of capsuloplasty and silver-coated implants.

Direct Cementation of Dual Mobility Cups Into the Bony Acetabulum in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes at a Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up

BackgroundCemented dual mobility cups (DMCs) are commonly used in combination with acetabular reinforcement devices. Indeed, according to literature, direct cementation of metal-backed acetabular components into the bony acetabulum remains controversial as this technique is potentially associated with increased rates of aseptic loosening. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of DMC cemented into the bony acetabulum in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). MethodsA total of 49 THA (48 patients, mean age 78 years [range, 51 to 91]) performed with direct cementation of a DMC into the bony acetabulum were prospectively included in our total joint registry and retrospectively reviewed. The clinical outcome was assessed using the Harris hip score (HHS). The radiographic outcome included measurement of component positioning and occurrence and progression of demarcation around the cemented DMC. Complications were reported with a particular attention to cemented fixation failure and aseptic loosening. ResultsAt a 7-year mean follow-up (range, 5 to 8), the pre-to postoperative HHS improved from 47 (range, 30 to 58) to 92 points (range, 80 to 98) (P < .01). Nonprogressive and focalized demarcations were observed in 7 THA (14%). Importantly, no progressive demarcation or DMC aseptic loosening was observed. ConclusionDirect cementation of DMC into the bony acetabulum ensured a stable fixation with no progressive demarcation or aseptic loosening at midterm follow-up. Therefore, this technique can be selectively considered in primary THA, especially in elderly or frail patients to avoid potential mechanical failure of press-fit fixation due to altered bone quality or additional morbidity related to the use of acetabular reinforcement devices.

Risk factors for early reoperation in patients after posterior lumbar interbody fusion surgery. A propensity-matched cohort analysis

BackgroundReoperation is usually associated with poor results and increased morbidity and hospital costs. However, the rates, causes, and risk factors for reoperation in patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusion surgery remain controversial. This study aimed to identify the risk factors for early reoperation after posterior lumbar interbody fusion surgery and to compare the clinical outcomes between patients who underwent reoperation and those who did not. MethodsWe investigated a multicenter medical record database of 1263 patients who underwent posterior lumbar interbody fusion surgery between 2012 and 2015. A total of 72 (5.7%) reoperations within two years after surgery were identified and were propensity-matched for age, sex, number of fusion segments, and surgeon's experience. ResultsWe analyzed a total of 114 patients (57 who underwent reoperation (R group) and 57 who did not (C group)). The mean age was 62.6 ± 13.4 years, with 78 men and 36 women. The mean number of fused segments was 1.2 ± 0.5. Surgical site infection was the most common cause of reoperation. There were significant differences in the incidence of diabetes mellitus (p = 0.024), preoperative ambulation status (p = 0.046), and ASA grade (p < 0.001) between the C and R groups. The recovery rate of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score was significantly lower in the R group compared to the C group (R: 50.5 ± 28.8%, C: 63.9 ± 33.7%, p = 0.024). There were significant differences in the bone fusion rate (R: 63.2%, C: 96.5%, p < 0.001) and incidence of screw loosening (R: 31.6%; C: 10.5%; p = 0.006). ConclusionDiabetes mellitus, preoperative ambulation status, and ASA grade were significant risk factors for early reoperation following posterior lumbar interbody fusion surgery. The patients who underwent early reoperation had worse clinical outcomes than those who did not.

Arthroscopic repair of rotator cuff injury with bioabsorbable suture anchor vs. all-suture anchor: a non-inferiority study

BackgroundCompare all-suture anchors to traditional anchors through clinical and radiological evaluation at pre-established end-points.Materials and methodsWe performed a two-arms non-inferiority study on all-suture anchor (2.3 iconix™, Stryker) device with respect to traditional anchor (5.5 healix Advance™ BR, Depuy/Mitek) device under unpaired samples with size equal to 30 patients per group, all suffering from supraspinatus tendon rupture. We administrated DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand); constant; and SST (Simple Shoulder Test) questionnaires in pre-operative, 3 ± 1 months post-intervention and 8 ± 1 months post-intervention. Questionnaires scores were the primary outcome. We also evaluated RMI at 3 and at 8 months after surgery to assess the presence of oedema or any loosening of the implant.ResultsAll-suture anchor approach has been proven to have non-inferior performances with respect to traditional anchor approach, according to questionnaires scores at the 3-month endpoint. We observed 26 patients with oedema by MRI (18 in control group, 6 in experimental group). In the 8-month endpoint we found persistent edema in 12 patients (all treated with healix), 2 had mobilitazions (healix), 10 had partial retears (8 healix, 2 iconix) and 1 implant failure (healix).ConclusionsAll suture devices have clinical and functional results comparable to traditional devices, while they tend to give fewer complications in terms of bone edema, loosening and retear rate. The effectiveness of all-suture devices should be further investigated in rotator cuff suture arthroscopic revision surgery, given the advantages they offer.