Heart Failure Hospitalization Rates Research Articles

Pharmacological and Non-Pharmacological Advancements in Heart Failure Treatment.

Heart failure (HF) is a complex, life-threatening condition characterized by high mortality, morbidity, and poor quality of life. Despite studies of epidemiology, pathogenesis, and therapies, the rate of HF hospitalization is still increasing due to the growing and aging population and an increase in obesity in relatively younger individuals. It remains a predominant issue in the public health and the global economic burden. Current research has focused on how HF affects the entire range of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), especially the three HF subgroups. This review provides a latest overview of pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies of these three subgroups (HF with preserved ejection fraction, HF with reduced ejection fraction, and HF with mildly reduced ejection fraction). We summarize conventional therapies, investigate novel strategies, and explore the new technologies such as aortic thoracic stimulation and interatrial shunting devices.

Geographical variation in patient characteristics and outcomes in heart failure with mildly reduced and preserved ejection fraction.

Compared to heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction, HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), and HF with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) are increasing in prevalence, yet little is known about the geographic variation in patient characteristics, treatments and outcomes among these two HF phenotypes. The aim of this study was to investigate geographic differences in HFpEF and HFmrEF. We conducted an individual patient analysis of five clinical trials enrolling patients with HFpEF or HFmrEF from North America (NA), Latin America (LA), Western Europe (WE), Central/Eastern Europe and Russia (CEER), and Asia-Pacific (AP). We compared regions using descriptive statistics and multivariable regression models. Among the 19 959 patients included, 4066 (23.1%) had HFmrEF and 15 353 (76.9%) HFpEF. Regardless of HF phenotype, patients from WE were oldest, and those in CEER youngest. LA had the largest portion of females and NA most black patients. Obesity and diabetes were most prevalent in NA and hypertension and coronary heart disease most common in CEER. Self-reported health status varied strikingly and was the worst in NA and best in AP. Among patients with HFmrEF, rates of the primary composite endpoint (cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization) were: NA 12.56 per 100 patient-years (/100py), AP 11.67/100py, CEER 10.12/100py, LA 8.90/100py, and WE 8.43/100py, driven by differences in the rate of HF hospitalization. The corresponding values in HFpEF were 11.47/100py, 7.80/100py, 5.47/100py, 5.92/100py, and 7.80/100py, respectively. There is substantial geographic variation in patient characteristics, treatment and outcomes among patients with HFpEF and HFmrEF. These findings have implications for interpretation and generalizability of trial results, design and conduct of future trials, and optimization of care for these patients.

Physician-directed patient self-management in heart failure using left atrial pressure: Interim insights from the VECTOR-HF I and IIa studies.

Haemodynamic monitoring using implantable pressure sensors reduces the risk of heart failure (HF) hospitalizations. Patient self-management (PSM) of haemodynamics in HF has the potential to personalize treatment, increase adherence, and reduce the risk of worsening HF, while lowering clinicians' burden. The VECTOR-HF I and IIa studies are prospective, single-arm, open-label clinical trials assessing safety, usability and performance of left atrial pressure (LAP)-guided HF management using PSM in New York Heart Association class II and III HF patients. Physician-prescribed LAP thresholds trigger patient self-adjustment of diuretics. Primary endpoints include the ability to perform LAP measurements and transmit data to the healthcare provider (HCP) interface and the patient guidance application, and safety outcomes. This is an interim analysis of 13 patients using the PSM approach. Over 12 months, no procedure- or device-related major adverse cardiovascular or neurological events were observed, and there were no failures to obtain measurements from the sensor and transmit the data to the HCP interface and the patient guidance application. Patient adherence was 91.4%. Using PSM, annualized HF hospitalization rate significantly decreased compared to a similar period prior to PSM utilization (0 admissions vs. 0.69 admissions over 11.84 months, p = 0.004). At 6 months, 6-min walk test distance and the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire overall summary score demonstrated significant improvement. Interim findings suggest that PSM using a LAP monitoring system is feasible and safe. PSM is associated with high patient adherence, potentially improving HF patients' functional status, quality of life, and limiting HF hospitalizations.

Association between triglyceride-glucose index and the risk of heart failure hospitalization in older diabetic patients received right ventricular pacing: a retrospective cohort study.

The prognostic value of triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index is not yet known for older diabetic patients received right ventricular pacing (RVP). We aimed to investigate the association between TyG index and the risk of heart failure hospitalization (HFH) in older diabetic patients received RVP. This study was conducted between January 2017 and January 2018 at Fuwai Hospital, Beijing, China, and included older (age ≥ 65years) diabetic patients that received RVP for the first time. TyG index were obtained before implantation. The primary endpoint was HFH. A total of 231 patients were divided into three groups according to the tertiles of TyG index: < 8.5 (T1, N = 77), 8.5-9.1 (T2, N = 77), and > 9.1 (T3, N = 77). T3 group had higher rate of HFH (Log-rank = 11.7, P = 0.003). Multivariate analyses showed that, TyG index served as an independent predictor for HFH, both as numerical variable (HR = 1.94, 95% CI 1.21-3.11, P = 0.006), and as categorical variable (HR = 2.31, 95% CI 1.09-4.89, P = 0.03). RCS demonstrated that the risk of HFH was relatively low until TyG index exceeded 8.8, beyond which the risk began to increase rapidly (P-non-linear = 0.006). Preimplantation TyG index emerges as a robust, independent predictor for HFH in older diabetic patients received RVP, and TyG index > 8.8 might be the optimal cut-off value.

Impact of the clinical frailty scale on long-term outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation

BackgroundThe semiquantitative Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) is reportedly a useful marker for predicting short- and mid-term mortality after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). We assessed the long-term prognostic impact of CFS in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI. MethodsWe prospectively assessed patients undergoing TAVI in Kokura Memorial Hospital using a 9-level CFS and enrolled 1594 patients after excluding patients with CFS 8-9. The patients were divided into the low (CFS level, 1–3; N = 842), intermediate (4; N = 469), and high (5-7; N = 283) groups according to their CFS levels. ResultsIn the low, intermediate, and high groups, 3-year all-cause mortality rates were 17.4%, 29.4%, and 41.7% (P <0.001) and composite rates of cardiovascular mortality and heart failure hospitalization were 12.1%, 19.1%, and 23.9% (P <0.001), respectively. Multivariable analysis showed that higher frailty was independently associated with all-cause mortality (intermediate group: adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.63, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.24–2.15, P <0.001; high group: adjusted HR, 2.18, 95% CI, 1.59–2.99, P <0.001) and composite of cardiovascular mortality and heart failure hospitalization (intermediate group: adjusted HR, 1.47, 95% CI, 1.04–2.08, P = 0.030; high group: adjusted HR, 1.66, 95% CI, 1.09–2.51, P = 0.018) and this result was consistent, irrespective of stratification based on age, sex, body mass index, left ventricular ejection fraction, Society of Thoracic Surgeons score, and New York Heart Association functional class without significant interaction. ConclusionsThe simple CFS tool predicts the long-term adverse outcomes post-TAVI.

Reduced heart failure hospitalizations and improved quality of life in cardiac amyloidosis patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation

Abstract Background Cardiac amyloidosis (CA) has been associated with an increased risk of atrial arrhythmias and development and worsening of heart failure due to infiltration of the amyloid protein in the atrial wall. Few data exist regarding prognosis, symptoms, and quality of life after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in this category of patients. Objective The study evaluates the outcome of hospitalization for heart failure and quality of life in cardiac amyloidosis patients with atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation. Methods This is a study including 102 consecutive patients from two different centers with an established diagnosis of amyloidosis ATTR that underwent their first AF catheter ablation for persistent AF. They underwent pulmonary vein (PV) isolation + isolation of left atrial posterior wall and superior vena cava. Additionally, extrapulmonary triggers were identified and ablated. Post procedure, patients were followed up routinely with ECG during office visits, 7-day Holter monitor and event recorders during the first year followed by biannual checkups during the remaining part of the follow-up period. Quality of life (QoL) was measured using The Minnesota Living Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) before Catheter ablation and after 18 months follow up; QoL was compared with T-test. Results 102 patients (mean age 72 ± 6) were included in the study. After 18 months follow up, 72 patients (70.6%) remained arrhythmia-free without antiarrhythmic drugs (Group 1), whereas 30 patients (29.4%) experienced recurrence (Group 2). In Group 1, 9 patients were hospitalized for heart failure, in contrast to 18 patients in Group 2, indicating a higher rate of heart failure hospitalizations associated with arrhythmia recurrence (p=0.02). The Quality of life in group 1 was 62 ±12 points before ablation and 63±16 points at 18 months follow up (p=0.17) while in group 2 was 68±16 points before ablation and 86±12 points at 18 months follow up (p&amp;lt;0.001). Conclusion Catheter ablation for AF in patients with cardiac amyloidosis is associated with reduced hospitalizations for heart failure, along with improvement in QoL.

Association between leukocyte telomere length and heart failure hospitalization based on the presence of the atrial fibrillation

Abstract Leukocyte telomere length (LTL) is a well-established biomarker linked to cardiovascular disease, with shorter LTL associated with increased severity of heart failure (HF) outcomes. It is also well known that atrial fibrillation (AF) and HF are closely related and often coexist. This study explores the relationship between LTL and hospitalization due to HF, considering both AF and non-AF patients within the UK Biobank cohort. Retrospective analysis of the UK Biobank dataset (n=451,552, mean age 57.0±8.1 years, 45.8% male) excluded individuals with pre-existing HF (n=12,162) and extreme/no LTL data (n=36,829). LTL was quantified using multiplex quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Among 445,895 participants without AF at enrollment, 2,851 were hospitalized for HF (mean age 63.1±5.8, 63.3% male), while 313 with AF (mean age 64.3±5.3, 68.4% male) experienced HF hospitalization. Shorter LTL correlated significantly with HF hospitalization in both non-AF (826.8±117.7 vs 797.9±115.5, P &amp;lt; 0.001) and AF groups (804.8±116.1 vs 789.2±115.9, P &amp;lt; 0.001). Categorized into quartiles, shorter LTL consistently associated with higher HF hospitalization rates in both non-AF (P for trend &amp;lt; 0.001) and AF groups (P for trend = 0.022). Adjusting for age, sex, and cardiovascular risk factors, longer LTL correlated with reduced HF risk (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.77-0.98; P = 0.017), independent of AF presence (P for interaction=0.629). This study establishes an association between shorter LTL and increased HF hospitalization rates, regardless of AF presence. These findings underscore the significance of LTL as a potential prognostic biomarker for HF, emphasizing its relevance in both AF and non-AF populations

Strauss criteria for left bundle branch block in cardiac resynchronization therapy: improved response with lower ventricular arrhythmic burden

Abstract Objectives The study sought to evaluate the impact of the stricter Strauss criteria for left bundle branch block (St-LBBB) on cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) response, hospitalizations, ventricular arrhythmia (VA) events and mortality. Background Although left bundle branch block (LBBB) is a strong predictor of response to CRT, a significant number of patients remain non-responders. Methods This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data on heart failure (HF) patients with LBBB admitted for CRT implantation. Patients were divided in two groups according to the fulfillment or not of St-LBBB criteria. Results 82 patients with ischemic (ICM) and non-ischemic (NICM) HF [46 (56%) with St-LBBB and 36 (44%) with non-St-LBBB] were included. CRT response was more likely to occur in patients with St-LBBB (p&amp;lt;0.01), with the group of NICM exhibiting the greatest benefit (p&amp;lt;0.01). St-LBBB CRT responders displayed significantly lower rates of HF hospitalization (p&amp;lt;0.0001) compared to non-St-LBBB group. This was mostly evident in patients with NICM (p&amp;lt;0.0001) according to Kaplan-Meier time curves. CRT responders displayed significantly fewer VA events (p&amp;lt;0.001) and lower mortality rates (p&amp;lt;0.0001) than non-responders. Kaplan-Meier estimates demonstrated a significantly lower incidence of VAs in NICM patients with St-LBBB (p:0.049) in comparison to ICM patients with St-LBBB (p:0.25). Lower mortality rates were observed in CRT responders than non-responders (p&amp;lt;0.0001) with the group of NICM with St-LBBB criteria exhibiting the greatest benefit (p:0.0238). Conclusions Patients with NICM and St-LBBB present the greatest benefit with respect to CRT response, HF hospitalizations, VA events, and mortality. St-LBBB criteria may improve patient selection for CRT.

Transcatheter or Surgical Replacement for Failed Bioprosthetic Aortic Valves

The use of valve-in-valve (ViV) transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has been rapidly expanding as an alternative treatment to redo surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) for failed bioprosthetic valves despite limited long-term data. To assess mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing intervention for failed bioprosthetic SAVR. This was a retrospective population-based cohort analysis conducted between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2020, with a median (IQR) follow-up time of 2.3 (1.1-4.0) years. A total of 1771 patients with a history of bioprosthetic SAVR who underwent ViV-TAVR or redo SAVR in California, New York, and New Jersey were included. Data were obtained from the California Department of Health Care Access and Information, the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System, and the New Jersey Discharge Data Collection System. Exclusion criteria included undergoing TAVR or redo SAVR within 5 years from initial SAVR, as well as infective endocarditis, concomitant surgical procedures, and out-of-state residency. Propensity matching yielded 375 patient pairs. Data were analyzed from January to December 2023. ViV-TAVR vs redo SAVR. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were stroke, heart failure hospitalization, reoperation, major bleeding, acute kidney failure, new pacemaker insertion, and infective endocarditis. From 2015 through 2020, the proportion of patients undergoing ViV-TAVR vs redo SAVR increased from 159 of 451 (35.3%) to 498 or 797 (62.5%). Of 1771 participants, 653 (36.9%) were female, and the mean (SD) age was 74.4 (11.3) years. Periprocedural mortality and stroke rates were similar between propensity-matched groups. The ViV-TAVR group had lower periprocedural rates of major bleeding (2.4% vs 5.1%; P = .05), acute kidney failure (1.3% vs 7.2%; P < .001), and new pacemaker implantations (3.5% vs 10.9%; P < .001). The 5-year all-cause mortality rate was 23.4% (95% CI, 15.7-34.1) in the ViV-TAVR group and 13.3% (95% CI, 9.2-18.9) in the redo SAVR group. In a landmark analysis, no difference in mortality was observed up to 2 years (hazard ratio, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.59-1.78), but after 2 years, ViV-TAVR was associated with higher mortality (hazard ratio, 2.97; 95% CI, 1.18-7.47) as well as with a higher incidence of heart failure hospitalization (hazard ratio, 3.81; 95% CI, 1.57-9.22). There were no differences in 5-year incidence of stroke, reoperation, major bleeding, or infective endocarditis. Compared with redo SAVR, ViV-TAVR was associated with a lower incidence of periprocedural complications and a similar incidence of all-cause mortality through 2 years' follow-up. However, ViV-TAVR was associated with higher rates of late mortality and heart failure hospitalization. These findings may be influenced by residual confounding and require adjudication in a randomized clinical trial.

Left bundle branch pacing and cardiac remodeling in HF patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: epigenetic pathways and clinical outcomes.

Left bundle branch (LBB) pacing could achieve cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients who cannot be resynchronized via the placement of the left ventricle (LV) lead into the coronary sinus. LBB pacing could improve cardiovascular outcomes in heart failure (HF) patients with LBB block who are affected by type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). LBB pacing could increase the number of CRT responders and lead to the best clinical outcomes in HF patients with T2DM, inducing cardiac remodeling and improving left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) via microRNA (miR) modulation. In a multicenter observational study, we enrolled 334 HF patients with LBB block and an indication to receive LBB pacing for CRT. In these patients, we evaluated the CRT responder rate, clinical outcomes, and miR expression at 1 year of follow-up. At 1 year of follow-up, we had 223 responders (66.8%), 132 hospitalizations for HF (39.5%), 24 cardiac deaths (7.2%), and 37 all-cause deaths (11.1%), with a higher rate of HF hospitalizations (77 (69.4%) vs 55 (24.7%), p < 0.05), and cardiac deaths (13 (11.7% vs 11 (4.9%), p < 0.05) in non-responders vs responders. At the end of follow-up, we found the lowest expression of miR-26, miR-29, miR-30, miR-92, and miR-145 in LBB-pacing non-responders vs responders (p < 0.05), and a direct correlation between miR-30 (0.340, [0.833-1.915]; p 0.001), the 6-minute-walking test (6MWT; 0.168, [0.008-0.060]; p 0.011), angiotensin-receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNI; 0.157, [0.183-4.877]; p 0.035), sodium-glucose-transporter-2 inhibitors (0.245, [2.242-7.283]; p 0.001), and LVEF improvements. C reactive protein (CRP) inversely correlated with LVEF improvement (-0.220, [-(0.066-0.263)]; p 0.001). ARNI (1.373, CI 95% [1.007-1.872], p 0.045), miR-30 (2.713, CI 95% [1.543-4.769], p 0.001), and 6MWT (1.288, CI 95% [1.084-1.998], p 0.001) were predictors of LBB pacing responders at 1 year of follow-up. LBB-pacing responders evidenced miR modulation, which was linked to significant improvement of the cardiac pump. Specifically, miR-30 was linked to cardiac pump improvement and predicted responders at 1 year of follow-up in patients with T2DM.

Outcomes of mitral TEER in non-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundSecondary mitral regurgitation (MR) worsens in 10–15 % of heart failure (HF) patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) with Mitra-Clip (Abbot Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, USA) therapy is associated with improved survival and decreased rates of hospitalization for HF in selected patients with secondary MR. Data on TEER outcomes in CRT-non-responders are limited. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate outcomes of mitral TEER with Mitra-Clip in CRT-non-responders. MethodsCochrane, Scopus, MEDLINE, and EMBASE were searched for studies discussing outcomes of Mitra-Clip in CRT non-responders. Two reviewers were independently involved in screening studies and extracting relevant data. Individual study incidence rate estimates underwent logit transformation to calculate the weighted summary proportion under the random effect model. ResultsA total of eight reports met the inclusion criteria (439 patients). Mitra-Clip improved MR grade to ≤2+ in 83.8 % and 86.8 % of CRT non-responders at six months and one year, respectively. Symptomatic improvement (New York Heart Association class ≤II) was also found in 71 % and 78.1 % of CRT non-responders at six months and one year, respectively. The pooled overall incidence estimates of mortality at 30 days, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years were 3.6 %, 9.2 %, 17.8 %, and 25.9 %, respectively. ConclusionTEER with Mitra-Clip in patients with significant secondary MR who do not respond to CRT was associated with MR improvement, alleviation of symptoms, and mortality rates similar to those in the COAPT trial.

Implications of trial eligibility in patients with heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction.

Clinical trials in heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction (HFmrEF/HFpEF) commonly have detailed eligibility criteria. This may contribute to challenges with efficient enrolment and questions regarding the generalizability of trial findings. Patients with HFmrEF/HFpEF from a large US healthcare system were identified through a computable phenotype applied in linked imaging and electronic health record databases. We evaluated shared eligibility criteria from five recent/ongoing HFmrEF/HFpEF trials (PARAGON-HF, EMPEROR-Preserved, DELIVER, FINE-ARTS, and SPIRRIT-HFpEF) and compared clinical and echocardiographic features as well as outcomes between trial-eligible and trial-ineligible patients. Among 5552 patients with HFpEF/HFmrEF, 792 (14%) were eligible for trial consideration, having met all criteria assessed. Causes of ineligibility included lack of recent loop diuretics (37%), significant pulmonary disease (24%), reduced estimated glomerular filtration rate (17%), recent stroke/transient ischaemic attack (13%), or low natriuretic peptides (12%); 53% of ineligible patients had >1 reason for exclusion. Compared with eligible patients, ineligible patients were younger (age 71 vs. 75years, P<0.001) with higher rates of coronary artery disease (66% vs. 59%, P<0.001) and peripheral vascular disease (40% vs. 33%, P<0.001), but less mitral regurgitation, lower E/e' ratio, and smaller left atrial sizes. Both eligible and ineligible patients demonstrated high rates of structural heart disease consistent with HFpEF [elevated left atrial size or left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy/increased LV mass], although this was slightly higher among eligible patients (95% vs. 92%, P=0.001). The two cohorts demonstrated similar LV global longitudinal strain along with a similar prevalence of atrial fibrillation/flutter, hypertension, and obesity. Ineligible patients had similar all-cause mortality (33% vs. 33% at 3years) to those eligible but lower rates of heart failure hospitalization (20% vs. 28% at 3years, P<0.001). Among patients with HFmrEF/HFpEF from a large health system, approximately one in seven were eligible for major trials based on key criteria applied through a clinical computable phenotype. These findings highlight the large proportion of patients with HFmrEF/HFpEF ineligible for contemporary trials for whom the generalizability of trial findings may be questioned and further investigation would be beneficial.

HEART FAILURE AND ITS PHENOTYPES IN THE REAL WORLD: DATA FROM THE CARDIOVASCULAR OBSERVATORY OF FRIULI–VENEZIA GIULIA

Abstract Introduction Heart Failure (HF) is a disease with high mortality and morbidity burden. Guidelines classify HF according the ejection fraction (EF) in three phenotypes. HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is the most prevalent in the real world for increasing in life expectancy and the presence of many comorbidities. Aim Knowing and analysing the epidemiology and clinic features of HF to create the most appropriate diagnostic–therapeutic pathways. The Cardiovascular Observatory of Friuli–Venezia Giulia (CVOFVG), which allows this analysis, is a powerful tool for clinical governance. Results In Friuli Venezia Giulia, at 1st January 2023, 21.212 alive patients had a HF diagnosis (1.78% prevalence). Considering the different phenotypes, in the real world, from 2018 to 2023, the most prevalent patients had EF &amp;gt; 40% (in 2022: HFpEF 55%, HFmrEF 9% and HFimpEF 20%). In our registry patients with HFpEF are older (mean age 80±10 yrs vs 79±11 yrs in HFmrEF vs 76±11 yrs in HFrEF), mostly women (52% vs 38% in HFmrEF, vs 27% in HFrEF), with many cardiovascular (CV) diseases, such as atrial fibrillation (57% vs 53% in HFmrEF vs 49% in HFrEF) and non CV as obesity and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. As expected, ischemic heart disease is prevalent in HFrEF in 59% vs 38% in HFpEF. In the CVOFVG, in 2022 the hospitalization rate was 1260/100000 inhabitants (262 for HF hospitalization, 188 for CV causes, 808 for non CV disease). HFrEF has a higher incidence of HF hospitalization (54.3 on 166.2/100.000 totals). Furthermore, HFpEF because of its high prevalence, has a higher rate of CV and HF hospitalization than HFrEF (77.8 vs 54.3/100.000 inhabitants for year, 929 hospitalization vs 646). The mortality in one year is higher in HFrEF and HFmrEF vs HFpEF and above all HFimpEF. Drug prescription was different from clinical trial: in 2022, 72.2% of HFrEF patients received renin angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi), 89.2% beta blockers (BB), 62.6% mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) and 44% SGLT2–inibitors (SGLT2–I). Same prescription for RASi, BB, MRA was in HFimpEF and HFmrEF, less for HFpEF. Conclusions The patients’ complexity, their increasing number, the new drugs for HFpEF lead to create multidisciplinary pathways, above all for HFpEF patients who are frequently visited by General Physicians, Internal Physicians and Geriatrics, to select the most complex case where a therapeutic intervention can be efficacy.

Sex Differences in the Associations of Traditional Risk Factors and Incident Heart Failure Hospitalization: A Prospective Cohort Study of 102 278 Chinese General Adults.

Evidence regarding sex differences in the associations of traditional risk factors with incident heart failure (HF) hospitalization among Chinese general adults is insufficient. This study aimed to evaluate the potential sex differences in the associations of traditional risk factors with HF among Chinese general adults. Data were from a subcohort of the China PEACE (Patient-Centered Evaluative Assessment of Cardiac Events) Million Persons Project. The traditional risk factors were collected at baseline, and the study outcome was HF-related hospitalization identified from the Inpatients Registry. A total of 102 278 participants (mean age, 54.3 years; 39.5% men) without prevalent HF were recruited. A total of 1588 cases of HF-related hospitalization were captured after a median follow-up of 3.52 years. The incidence rates were significantly higher in men (2.1%) than in women (1.2%). However, the observed lower risk of HF in women was significantly attenuated or even vanished when several traditional risk factors were poorly controlled (P for sex-by-risk factors <0.05). The selected 11 risk factors collectively explained 62.5% (95% CI, 55.1-68.8) of population attributable fraction for HF in women, which is much higher than in men (population attributable fraction, 39.6% [95% CI, 28.5-48.9]). Although women had a lower incidence rate of hospitalization for HF than men in this study, the risk for HF increased more remarkably in women than in men when several traditional risk factors were poorly controlled. This study suggests that intensive preventative strategies are immediately needed in China.

Real-World Clinical Burden of Newly Diagnosed Heart failure in Thai Patients.

There are limited data on the burden of newly diagnosed patients with heart failure (HF) in Thailand. Thus, this study aimed to fully understand the hospitalization, rehospitalization, mortality rates, demographics and characteristics, and quality of care in these patients. A retrospective review of all eligible adult patients' medical records from 2018 and 2019 was conducted at five hospitals.The patients were newly diagnosed with HF, as indicated by the International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 code "I50." Descriptive statistics was used to investigate patients' hospital burden and clinical outcome data. There were 1134 patients newly diagnosed with HF, classified as HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), and HF with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) (44.0, 40.0, and 16.0%, respectively). The male-to-female ratios in HFmrEF and HFpEF were similar. In contrast, the proportion of men with HFrEF was greater. The mean age of all patients was 66.0years. The hospitalization rate was 1.3. Rehospitalization rates for HF-related issues were 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, and 0.5 at 30days, 60days, 180days, and 1year, respectively. The percentage of deaths from all causes among these patients was 9.8%, while the percentage of deaths from cardiovascular-related causes was 8.5%. Only a small proportion of patients received a target dose of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT). The study revealed that the characteristics, hospitalization rate for HF, and in-hospital mortality rate among newly diagnosed patients with HF were higher compared to similar studies conducted in Thailand and other countries. Moreover, a high quality of care is needed to improve the morbidity and mortality associated with HF in Thailand.

Urocortin 2 Gene Transfer in Mice Improves Diastolic Function in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

Patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) comprise about 50% of patients with heart failure in the US (&gt;3 million people). There are currently no treatments for HFpEF that prolong life, and few that reduce HF hospitalization rates. The Schlager BPH (Blood Pressure-High) mouse is a genetic model of hypertension, a major contributing factor in left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction and HFpEF. This study test the hypothesis that intravenous (i.v.) delivery of a long-term expression vector encoding murine urocortin 2 (AAV8.m Ucn2) can improve LV diastolic function in mice with impaired LV diastolic function. Twelve male and 12 female BPH mice (21.3±0.5 g; 3.1±0.1 months-old) with an ejection fraction (EF) of 60±2% (echocardiography) were studied. Prior to Ucn2 gene transfer their unsedated systolic/diastolic blood pressures (tail cuff) were (183/146±2/7 mmHg, n=24), conforming the presence of severe hypertension. The BPH mice were separated into two groups (6M &amp; 6F in each group). One group (BPH + Ucn2) received AAV8.m Ucn2 (2x1013 gc/kg, i.v) and the other group (BPH) received saline, i.v. Seven weeks after randomization, LV EF showed a group difference (BPH: 54±2%, n=12; BPH+Ucn2: 74±2%, n=12; p&lt;.0001) that was same as with systolic/diastolic blood pressure (BPH: 183/154±4/4 mmHg, n=12; BPH +Ucn2: 142/117±4/4 mmHg; p&lt;0.0001). In addition, physiological studies conducted in vivo showed accelerated cardiac relaxation in the Ucn2-treated mice (see Tau in Table), indicating superior LV relaxation after Ucn2 gene transfer. Conclusion: Ucn2 gene transfer improves LV diastolic and systolic function in mice with HFpEF, indicating that such a strategy may be applicable in clinical settings. [Formula: see text] Merit grant from the Department of Veterans Affairs (I01 BX003774). This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2024 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.

Representativeness of the PIONEER-HF and PARAGLIDE-HF in patients hospitalized with acute heart failure.

The PIONEER-HF and PARAGLIDE-HF trials aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of the in-hospital initiation of sacubitril/valsartan in patients hospitalized for AHF. However, whether the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the trials apply to patients encountered in real-world routine care is unclear. This study aimed to investigate the applicability of the PIONEER-HF and PARAGLIDE-HF trials to real-world AHF patients. We identified 28293 AHF hospitalized patients between August 2008 to August 2017 from the Chang Gung Research Database and classified them into four groups based on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and trial criteria. Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare the risk of HF hospitalization and cardiovascular (CV) death. We defined PIONEER-HF eligible (n=3683) and non-eligible (n=3502) patients with an LVEF ≤40%, and PARAGLIDE-HF eligible (n=5191) and non-eligible (n=5832) patients with an LVEF >40%. Over a mean follow-up of 3.5years, the PIONEER-HF non-eligible and eligible groups exhibited similar rates of HF hospitalization and CV death (41.1% vs. 41.8%, adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.88-1.04). No significant difference was found in the composite outcome between PARAGLIDE-HF non-eligible and eligible groups (36.7% vs. 38.6%; aHR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.90-1.04). Using trial criteria, only 31.3% of AHF patients were eligible for sacubitril-valsartan. Yet, non-eligible patients demonstrated similar outcomes to eligible patients, indicating a need for further evaluation of sacubitril-valsartan benefits in non-eligible AHF patients.

Cause-Specific Health Care Costs Following Hospitalization for Heart Failure and Cost Offset With SGLT2i Therapy

BackgroundLittle is known regarding differences in cause-specific costs between heart failure (HF) with ejection fraction (EF) ≤40% vs >40%, and potential cost implications of sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) therapy. ObjectivesThis study sought to compare cause-specific health care costs following hospitalization for HF with EF ≤40% vs >40% and estimate the cost offset with implementation of SGLT2i therapy. MethodsThis study examined Medicare beneficiaries hospitalized for HF in the Get With The Guidelines–Heart Failure registry from 2016 to 2020. Mean per-patient total (excluding drug costs) and cause-specific costs from discharge through 1-year follow-up were calculated and compared between EF ≤40% vs >40%. Next, risk reductions on total all-cause and HF hospitalizations were estimated in a trial-level meta-analysis of 5 pivotal trials of SGLT2is in HF. Finally, these relative treatment effects were applied to Medicare beneficiaries eligible for SGLT2i therapy to estimate the projected cost offset with implementation of SGLT2i, excluding drug costs. ResultsAmong 146,003 patients, 50,598 (34.7%) had EF ≤40% and 95,405 (65.3%) had EF >40%. Mean total cost through 1 year was $40,557. Total costs were similar between EF groups overall but were higher for EF ≤40% among patients surviving the 1-year follow-up period. Patients with EF >40% had higher costs caused by non-HF and noncardiovascular hospitalizations, and skilled nursing facilities (all P < 0.001). Trial-level meta-analysis of the 5 SGLT2i clinical trials estimated 11% (rate ratio: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.84-0.93; P < 0.001) and 29% (rate ratio: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.66-0.76; P < 0.001) relative reductions in rates of total all-cause and HF hospitalizations, respectively, regardless of EF. Reductions in all-cause and HF hospitalizations were projected to reduce annual costs of readmission by $2,451 to $2,668 per patient with EF ≤40% and $1,439 to $2,410 per patient with EF >40%. ConclusionsIn this large cohort of older U.S. adults hospitalized for HF, cause-specific costs of care differed among patients with EF ≤40% vs >40%. SGLT2i significantly reduced the rate of HF and all-cause hospitalizations irrespective of EF in clinical trials, and implementation of SGLT2i therapy in clinical practice is projected to reduce costs by $1,439 to $2,668 per patient over the 1 year post-discharge, excluding drug costs.

Dapagliflozin ameliorates myocardial infarction injury through AMPKα-dependent regulation of oxidative stress and apoptosis

Dapagliflozin (DAPA) has been demonstrated to reduce cardiovascular mortality and heart failure hospitalization rates in diabetic patients. However, the mechanism underlying its cardio-protective effect in non-diabetic patients remains unclear. Our study aimed to explore the cardio-protective impact of DAPA on myocardial infarction in non-diabetic mice. We induced myocardial infarction in C57BL/6 mice by ligating the descending branch of the left coronary artery. After surgery, the animals were randomly treated with either saline or DAPA. We employed echocardiography, Western blot analysis, and tissue staining to assess post-infarction myocardial injury. Additionally, we investigated the mechanism of action through cell experiments. Compared to the myocardial infarction group, DAPA treatment significantly attenuated ventricular remodeling and improved cardiac function. By mitigating myocardial oxidative stress and apoptosis, DAPA may activate the AMPKα signaling pathway, thereby exerting a protective effect. These findings suggest that DAPA could serve as a novel therapeutic approach for patients with cardiac infarction.

N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide post-discharge monitoring in the management of patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction-a randomized trial: The NICE study.

There is a lack of specific studies assessing the impact of natriuretic peptide monitoring in the post-discharge management of patients with heart failure (HF) and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), throughout the vulnerable phase following acute HF hospitalization. The NICE study aims to assess the clinical benefit of incorporating N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) into the post-discharge management of HFpEF patients. Individuals admitted with HFpEF (left ventricular ejection fraction >50%) were included in a multicentre randomized controlled study employing an open-label design with event blinding (NCT02807168). Upon discharge, 157 patients were randomly allocated to either NT-proBNP monitoring (n = 79) or no access to NT-proBNP (control group, n = 78) during pre-scheduled visits at 2, 4 and 12 weeks. Clinical endpoints were evaluated at 6 months. The primary endpoint of HF rehospitalizations occurred in 12.1% patients, without significant differences observed between the NT-proBNP monitoring group (12.8%) and the control group (11.4%) (hazard ratio [HR] 1.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.47-2.81, p = 0.760). Regarding secondary endpoints, the NT-proBNP monitoring group demonstrated a significantly lower risk of death (1.3% vs. 10.1%; HR 0.12, 95% CI 0.02-0.98; p = 0.048), whereas non-HF hospitalizations (12.8% vs. 19.0%, p = 0.171) and any adverse clinical event (26.9% vs. 36.7%, p = 0.17) did not reach statistical significance [Correction added on 29 April 2024, after first online publication: In the preceding sentence, "95% CI 0.02 - 0.09" has been corrected to "95% CI 0.02 - 0.98; p = 0.048" in this version.]. Awareness of NT-proBNP levels were associated with higher doses of diuretics and renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers) in the NT-proBNP monitoring group. Post-discharge monitoring of NT-proBNP in HFpEF patients did not exhibit an association with reduced rates of HF hospitalization in this study. Nonetheless, it appears to enhance global clinical management by optimizing medical therapies and contributing to improved overall survival.