Chest Compression Rate Research Articles

72 Hospital level of service, rural-urban hospital location, and neonatal resuscitation interventions at birth: A population-based study in Alberta, Canada from 2000-2020

Abstract Background Advanced neonatal resuscitation interventions (ANRIs: endotracheal intubation, chest compressions, and epinephrine) are rarely needed for infants born at ≥34 weeks gestational age (GA). However, healthcare providers (HCPs) in community hospitals can encounter the need for ANRIs, while having less experience and resources than HCPs in centers with neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). Understanding practice differences between hospitals of different levels of service (LofS) and rural/urban location can inform quality improvement to reduce health disparities. Objectives To examine how hospital level of service and rural/urban location relate to ANRI rates in Alberta, Canada, a universal public health system with standardized Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) training. Design/Methods All live births ≥34 weeks GA in Alberta from 2000-2020 inclusive were examined using retrospective, population-level administrative data from the Alberta Perinatal Health Program (APHP). Hospitals (n=97) were contacted to determine annual LofS during the study period, with levels (0,1A/B/C,2,3) based on provincial obstetrical triage for availability of delivery support, cesarean-sections, obstetricians, paediatricians/neonatologists, and NICUs. Hospitals were further subcategorized by population and proximity to metropolitan centers.(Table 1) Rates of individual interventions or any ANRI were compared. Results There were 971,403 live births during the study period with a mean GA of 38.9 weeks; 1.6% were missing ANRI data, 955,835 births were included. Most occurred in hospitals with level 2 (57.4%) or level 3 (21.8%) NICUs; few occurred at sites with no delivery support (Level 0, 0.1%). ANRI rates were intubation (0.8%), chest compression (0.2%), and epinephrine (0.02%), any ANRI (0.96%, ~1/1000 live births). However, chest compression rates progressively decrease, and intubation rates progressively increase as LofS increases.(Table 1, Figure 1) When considering rural/urban location, there were outliers in chest compression rates in remote 0 (25.4/1000 live births) and metro-influenced 1A (30.2/1000 live births), intubation in remote 1C (33.3/1000 live births) and metro 0 (193.5/1000 live births) and epinephrine in metro 0 (64.5/1000 live births). Conclusion In this population-based cohort study of ≥34 weeks births, there were higher chest compressions rates and lower intubations rates at hospitals without NICUs despite standardized training. Reasons for this difference require further investigation; potential solutions such as targeted outreach education and introduction of laryngeal mask airways could be explored.

The effect of hand and body position on chest compression quality and rescuer fatigue in prone cardiopulmonary resuscitation

AimThis study aimed to compare the quality of compressions in supine cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and prone CPR by performing chest compressions on a manikin. Evaluating the effect of prone CPR using different hand and body position on the quality of manual chest compressions and fatigue of participants. MethodsAfter completing 2 min of chest compression in the supine position (Supine Group), 25 participants randomly performed three sets of 2-minutes chest compressions on a prone position manikin. Stand + hands overlapped Group: participants stood beside the patient bed with their hands overlapped and placed on the posterior segment of the thoracic spine between the scapulae, Straddle + hands separated Group: participants straddled the patient bed with their hands placed above the scapulae on both sides at the mid-chest level, and Straddle + hands overlapped Group: participants straddled the patient bed with their hands overlapping on the posterior segment of the thoracic spine between the scapulae. Subsequently, the quality of chest compressions and participants fatigue were assessed. ResultsChest compression depth ratio and mean chest compression depth (MCCD) were worse in the three prone CPR groups (Stand + hands overlapped Group: 0.0(0.0,15.6) %, 39.8 ± 1.3 mm; Straddle + hands separated Group: 1.4(0.0,11.7) %, 42.4 ± 1.2 mm; Straddle + hands overlapped Group: 0.0(0.0,9.2) %, 40.9 ± 1.2 mm) than in the Supine group (87.1(68.1,94.0) %; p < 0.001, 52.4 ± 0.4 mm; p < 0.001). In the three prone CPR groups, Straddle + hands separated Group had the greatest MCCD, lowest changes in heart rate (p = 0.018) and lowest changes in RPE scores (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between the four groups in terms of mean chest compression rate, accurate chest compression rate ratio, or correct recoil ratio. ConclusionThis simulation-based study showed that the quality of chest compressions was worse in the prone position than in the supine position. When prone chest compressions were performed using different hand and body position, prone CPR performed by a participant straddling a hospital bed with hands placed above the scapula on either side at the mid-chest level provided higher-quality chest compressions and lower rescuer fatigue.

Real-Time Chest Compression Depth, Rate, Posture, and Person Detections Using Binocular Vision for CPR Training

Real-Time Chest Compression Depth, Rate, Posture, and Person Detections Using Binocular Vision for CPR Training

Assessment of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality among Healthcare Providers: A Randomized Experimental Study of the Italian Resuscitation Council.

Background. The quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is pivotal in improving the outcome of cardiac arrest. Nevertheless, there is evidence that even professional rescuers may deliver ineffective chest compressions (CCs). We sought to evaluate the impact of a CPR feedback device on the quality of CC performed by a supposedly highly trained and skilled population of attendees to the national annual congress of the Italian Resuscitation Council. Methods. A total of 202 congress attendees were enrolled to perform 2 min CC without feedback, followed by a 5 min rest and another 2 min interval of CC with feedback. Moreover, participants were randomly assigned to two study groups: "feedback later", in which the first 2 min CCs were delivered without the feedback, and "feedback first", in which the first 2 min CCs were aided by feedback. CPR quality has been analyzed in terms of the percentage of CC with adequate depth (CC, %), complete chest release (CR, %), and the CC rate (CC/min). Results. Approximately 60% of correct CCs were performed without feedback, which significantly increased to 79% with the use of feedback. In the "feedback later" group, the percentage of correctly performed CC and CR significantly increased during the second 2 min interval of CC with feedback (median value 51% vs. 86%, p < 0.0001 and 71% vs. 84%, p = 0.025, respectively). In the "feedback first" group, the percentage of correct CC remained stable during the two CC intervals (71% vs. 80%, p = 0.06), while CR was better without the help of the feedback (70% vs. 93%, p < 0.0001). CC/min was in the recommended range (100-120/min) in all the CC events. Conclusions. In this population of expected highly skilled CPR providers, the overall quality was inconsistent and, in many cases, did not reach guidelines recommendations. The use of a feedback device significantly improved the quality of CC. When the feedback device was used in the first CC attempt, it had a learning effect that was reflected in maintaining quality during the second CC series.

The Effect of Step Stool Use on Chest Compression Quality During CPR in Young Children: Findings From the Videography in Pediatric Emergency Research (VIPER) Collaborative.

This study aimed to determine the effect of stepstool use on chest compression (CC) quality during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in young children. We conducted a prospective observational study of children <8 years of age who received CC for >2 minutes in the emergency department. Data were collected through CC monitor device and video review. Data were analyzed in "CC segments" (periods of CC by individual providers). CC segments were coded "yes" or "no" for stepstool use based on video review. Univariate analyses of CC rate and depth between stepstool use and hand positions were performed through nonparametric testing, stratified by age category. Forty-two patients received 566 minutes of CC. Overall, American Heart Association (AHA)-compliant (rate and depth) CPR was achieved in 10% of CC segments for children <1 year and only 6% in children >1 year. A stepstool was used in 73% of CC segments in children <1 year and 88% in children >1 year. In children >1 year, stepstool use was associated with deeper CCs (P < 0.001) and a more compliant CC rate (P < 0.01). In children >1 year, 7% of those with a stepstool in use achieved AHA compliance, compared to those without a stepstool, where none achieved AHA compliance. In children >1 year, stepstool use resulted in greater CC depth and more AHA-compliant CC rate. No CC segments in children >1 year achieved AHA compliance without a stepstool. These data support uniform stepstool use during pediatric CPR in children >1 year of age.

Manual versus automatic chest compression devices for cardiopulmonary resuscitation under zero gravity (The MACCC - 0G STUDY)

IntroductionCardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in microgravity requires specific methods to counteract weightlessness. Automatic chest compression devices (ACCDs) could improve CPR in microgravity. We aimed to compare ACCDs versus manual CPR in microgravity simulated through parabolic flights. MethodsThis prospective, open, controlled study compared 3 ACCDs (LUCAS 3©, AUTOPULSE©, EASYPULSE©) to manual CPR during the 66th CNES (Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales) parabolic flights campaign onboard the Novespace Air Zero-G A310 aircraft. Chest compression depths and rates were monitored by a Laerdal© Resusci-Ann-QCPR manikin. ResultsThe LUCAS 3© device had a median compression depth of 53.0 [53.0–54.0] mm, significantly higher than the EASYPULSE©, AUTOPULSE©, and Manual CPR (Handstand method), measured at 29.0 [26.0–32.0] mm, 29.0 [27.5–30.7] mm and 34.5 [29.6–43.3] mm, respectively (p value < 0.001). Compression rates were 101 [101–101], 100 [100–100] and 80 [80–80] compressions per minute (cpm) for the LUCAS 3©, EASYPULSE©, and AUTOPULSE©, respectively. Manual CPR provided a significantly higher compression rate with 115 [109–123] cpm (p value < 0.001). ConclusionOnly LUCAS 3© provided effective CPR according to international guidelines. ACCDs should implement microgravity CPR algorithms.

Improving Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality and Resuscitation Training by Using Real-Time Audiovisual-Assisted Devices.

Context Cardiac arrest occurring outside of a medical facility is a significant cause of death and disability worldwide. In developing nations, it accounts for a notable portion of total mortality, with only a small percentage of those affected surviving beyond the initial emergency department intervention. Despite the critical importance of high-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in these situations, there has been limited research on the effectiveness of audiovisual feedback devices in improving CPR performance among laypersons or non-medical caregivers. These caregivers, often untrained in advanced medical procedures, play a crucial role in the immediate response to cardiac arrest before professional help arrives. This study aims to address this gap by evaluating the impact of such devices on CPR quality delivered by non-medical individuals. Aim This study aimed to determine whether the use of audiovisual devices would improve cardiopulmonary resuscitation performance among non-medical care providers. Materials and methods Using amultiple-choice questionnaire, an audiovisual aid-based prospective observational study (non-interventional observation study) was conducted at a medical college hospital in Kochi from June 2022 to February 2024. A minimum sample size of 66 was derived from pilot studies, with 95% confidence and 90% power. A total of 146 participants met the inclusion criteria (non-medical personnelof 18-50 years of age). After the exclusion ofpregnant women and non-interested participants, the study participants were analyzed for the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a mannequin with the help of audiovisual devices.Statistical analysis was conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20 (IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, released in 2011). Categorical variables were expressed as frequency and percentage. McNemar's Chi-square test wasapplied to compare the CPR compression rates with and without the visual feedback device, and the kappa statistic was used to assesshow consistently participants performed within the same compression rate category (less than 100, 100-120, or more than 120 compressions per minute) with and without the feedback device. Results The improvement inCPR quality, which was visualized as a green color in the CPR feedback device, was significant, with 109 participants (74.7%) showing good outcomes. The chest compression rate also significantly improved from 95 to 117 with the use of feedback devices (p -0.011, Kappa - 0.167) among non-medical care providers. While the kappa value suggests that some variability exists in compression rates when switching between with and without feedback, the overall improvement is still noteworthy. Conclusion The majority of participants (74.7%) were able to consistently maintaingreen light in the visual feedback watch, which means their chest compression rate was within optimal range (100-120/min) when using the audiovisual feedback device. This indicated that use of audiovisual devicessignificantly improved compression rates among non-medical care providers andeffectively helped them perform high-quality CPR.

Awareness of first aid among adults in Al-Ahsa City, Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study.

First-aid knowledge among the general public is critical for saving lives in medical emergencies before expert care arrives. However, studies show persistent gaps in layperson first-aid capacity worldwide. This study assessed first-aid knowledge and awareness among adults in Al-Ahsa City, Saudi Arabia, to identify strengths and weaknesses to guide tailored interventions. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 716 adults recruited through convenience sampling. A structured questionnaire collected sociodemographics and assessed knowledge across 12 first-aid scenarios involving bleeding control, burns, seizures, choking, and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Just 59.2% correctly identified direct pressure to stop bleeding, and 61.2% knew proper burn first aid. Only 52% recognized the pediatric CPR compression-to-ventilation ratio (15:2), and 36.2% identified the chest compression rate of 100/min. For choking, 73.9% endorsed abdominal thrusts for children, but only 60.9% knew backslaps for infants. Females scored higher on bleeding (94.5% vs 92.8% correct) and abdominal thrusts (83.6% vs 66.1%), while males were more knowledgeable on burns (70.4% vs 53.8%) and infant choking (81.1% vs 44.7%). Younger and more educated respondents had higher scores. Major gaps exist in implementing proper first-aid techniques, especially differentiation by age. Deficits in direct bleeding control, high-quality CPR, and tailored pediatric care represent high-risk knowledge weaknesses in this population. Targeted education programs focused on skill-building in these areas, particularly for higher-risk demographics like the elderly and less educated, are critically needed to strengthen public preparedness and save lives. Findings provide key insights to inform evidence-based interventions.

Effectiveness of innovative chest compression on the emergency department stretcher by an alternative method: a randomized controlled crossover trial

Comparison of the three methods standing-on-a-stool (SS), one knee kneeling on a stretcher (KS), and kneeling at the same height as the patient’s bed on the kneeling stool (KK) to evaluate the yielded of highest CPR quality and rescuer comfortability. A prospective randomized cross-over study which compares the three different rescuer positions for their effectiveness of chest compression. Conducted at a tertiary care between 19 and 22 Aug 2022. Emergency personnel aged 18 years or older, who completed the AHA-approved BLS course. The chest compression data was obtained by the ALIVE AED manikin® and AED reporting system. The information on the CPR quality and post-test questionnaires assessing the participants’ preference, satisfaction and modified Borg’s scale score was collected. The three methods shown no statistically significant difference in adequate chest compression depth (percentage). KK was not superior than SS at chest compression rate (P = 0.05). The adequate full chest recoil achieved with KK and KS were significantly higher than that of SS. However, there were no statistical difference between the three methods in the modified Borg’s scale score. Based on the satisfying score, the rescuers preferred KK to either SS (p 0.007) or KS (p 0.012). The three methods shown no statistically significant difference in adequate chest compression depth (percentage). Still, both KK and KS provided more adequate chest recoil, so we would recommend using these two methods in the ED.Clinical trial registry: This study was retrospective registration in thaiclinicaltrials.org (TCTR20230119002, 19/1/2023).

The association of recent simulation training and clinical experience of team leaders with cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality during in-hospital cardiac arrest

ObjectiveWe aimed to investigate the association of recent team leader simulation training (<6 months) and years of clinical experience (≥4 years) with chest compression quality during in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA). MethodsThis cohort study of IHCA in four Danish hospitals included cases with data on chest compression quality and team leader characteristics. We assessed the impact of recent simulation training and experienced team leaders on longest chest compression pause duration (primary outcome), chest compression fraction (CCF), and chest compression rates within guideline recommendations using mixed effects models. ResultsOf 157 included resuscitation attempts, 45% had a team leader who recently participated in simulation training and 66% had an experienced team leader. The median team leader experience was 7 years [Q1; Q3: 4; 11]. The median duration of the longest chest compression pause was 16 s [10; 30]. Having a team leader with recent simulation training was associated with significantly shorter longest pause durations (difference: −7.11 s (95%-CI: −12.0; −2.2), p = 0.004), a higher CCF (difference: 3% (95%-CI: 2.0; 4.0%), p < 0.001) and with less guideline compliant chest compression rates (odds ratio: 0.4 (95%-CI: 0.19; 0.84), p = 0.02). Having an experienced team leader was not associated with longest pause duration (difference: −1.57 s (95%-CI: −5.34; 2.21), p = 0.42), CCF (difference: 0.7% (95%-CI: −0.3; 1.7), p = 0.17) or chest compression rates within guideline recommendations (odds ratio: 1.55 (95%-CI: 0.91; 2.66), p = 0.11). ConclusionRecent simulation training of team leaders, but not years of team leader experience, was associated with shorter chest compression pauses during IHCA.

A computer-based examination of the quality of resuscitation measures based on device data

Sudden cardiac arrest represents a critical medical emergency where the quality of resuscitation measures is crucial for favorable outcomes[1,2]. The quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) can be assessed through the analysis of data recorded by the defibrillator during CPR. The data is routinely recorded at the base of the emergency medical vehicles at the University Hospital of Graz.&#x0D; To assess CPR quality, algorithms were implemented to identify chest compressions based on the chest impedance and ventilations using the capnography signals. With these algorithms, parameters for CPR quality can be determined. A dataset with 522 cases was used, of which 97 cases were automatically discarded as they contained no or no relevant impedance signals.&#x0D; The mean chest compression rate of the cases is 116.3 ± 9.1 compressions per minute, which is within the target range of 90 – 120. However, in 31% of cases, the rate was found to be too high. The proportion of minutes without an adequate mean chest compression rate was 29.2 ([6.2; 60.4]) %.&#x0D; The mean ventilation frequency of all cases with capnography signal (150 cases) was 13.5 ± 3.6 ventilations per minute and, therefore, within the target range of a maximum of 15 ventilations. However, in 34% of cases, the ventilation frequency was too high.&#x0D; This work shows that a systematic and automated evaluation of defibrillator recordings is suitable for assessing the quality of resuscitation measures. The determined parameters produced plausible results and are consistent with the results of preliminary studies at the Medical University of Graz, which were carried out manually on significantly smaller datasets.

Comparison of the effects of using feedback devices for training or simulated cardiopulmonary arrest

BackgroundHigh-quality chest compression is essential for successful cardiac arrest resuscitation. High-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) can effectively improve the survival rate of patients with cardiopulmonary arrest. However, bystanders untrained in cardiopulmonary resuscitation may provide inadequate chest compressions. Previous studies have shown that the use of feedback devices in training alone or in simulated cardiopulmonary arrest alone can improve cardiopulmonary resuscitation. This study aims to determine whether using an audiovisual feedback (AVF) device during CPR training or a simulated cardiopulmonary arrest (CA) scenario would be more effective in improving the quality of chest compressions (CC).MethodsWe use a prospective, randomized, 2 × 2 factorial design trial. A total of 160 participants from Wuhan University and senior clinical medicine undergraduates who had not participated in any CPR training before and had no actual CPR experience are recruited. Each participant is randomized to 1 of 4 permutations, including AVF device vs. no AVF device during CPR training and AVF device vs. no AVF device during simulated CA. Main outcomes and measures are the depth, the percentage of CCs with correct depth (5–6 cm), the rate of CCs, and the percentage of CCs with the correct rate (100–120 cpm).ResultsThe use of the AVF device during simulated CA resulted in improved CC quality. In CA without AVF device, the average compression depth and the percentage of adequate depth with AVF device are 5.1 cm, 5.0 cm and 55.5%, 56.3%, respectively, which are higher than those without AVF device (4.5 cm, 4.7 cm and 32.8%, 33.6%). (p = 0.011, p = 0.000, both < 0.05).Compared with CA without AVF device, the average compression rate and the percentage of adequate rate with AVF device are 112.3 cpm, 111.2 cpm and 79.4%, 83.1%, respectively. The average compression rate and the percentage of adequate rate without using the AVF device are 112.4 cpm, 110.3 cpm and 71.5%, 68.5%, respectively. (p = 0.567 > 0.05, p = 0.017 < 0.05)Although the average compression rate in group D is slightly lower than that in group C, the percentage of suitable frequency with the feedback device is still higher than that without AVF device.ConclusionUsing a feedback device during simulated cardiopulmonary arrest is more effective in improving cardiopulmonary resuscitation than during training.

Metrics of impulsiveness of manual chest compressions for out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation

AimPropose new metrics of impulsiveness of manual chest compressions (CCs) that account for shape and duration, separate the characteristics of the compressive part of the CC cycle from those of the recoil part, and are uncorrelated to CC depth and rate. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest monitor-defibrillator recordings having CPR data. Specifically, episodes of adult patients with ≥ 1000 compressions free of leaning were examined. CCs were obtained from the depth signal of the valid episodes, and we calculated the novel metrics: compression area index (CAI), recoil area index (RAI), compression impulsiveness index (CII) and recoil impulsiveness index (RII). Generalized linear mixed-effects models and Jonckheere-Terpstra trend analyses were employed to measure differences between populations and trends, and the absolute value of Pearson's correlation coefficient |r| was used to report dependence between variables. Statistics are reported as median and interquartile range. ResultsWe analyzed 982,340 CCs corresponding to 453 episodes, for which we calculated their CAI, RAI and duty cycle (DC). We analyzed the metrics for various populations: age, sex, any ROSC achieved and disposition, and found that CAI was significantly different according to patient disposition and RAI relative to age and sex (p<0.05). None of the metrics was correlated strongly to depth or rate (|r| values of 0.22 or smaller), and all of them varied for CC series corresponding to the same rescuer over the course of resuscitation (ptrend<0.05). However, we observed that the metrics are not balanced, in that for any value of DC, CAI and RAI span almost their entire ranges. ConclusionThe proposed metrics correctly and completely describe manual CC waveforms, improve upon the DC, since they depend on the signal waveform, and provide additional information to current indicators of quality CPR, depth and rate. Furthermore, they allow to differentiate the compressive and recoil parts of the CC cycle, reflecting influence of the rescuer (via CAI or CII) and of the biomechanics of the patient's chest (via RAI or RII). Thus, they have the potential to contribute to better understanding CPR dynamics and, eventually, to enhanced quality of CPR practice as additional indicators of proper manual CC technique.

Impact of a COVID-19 code blue protocol on resuscitation care and CPR quality during in-hospital cardiac arrest

ObjectiveWe sought to evaluate the impact of a COVID-19 Code Blue policy on in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) processes of care, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) quality metrics, and survival to hospital discharge. MethodsWe completed a health record review of consecutive IHCA for which resuscitation was attempted. We report Utstein outcomes and CPR quality metrics 33 months before (July,2017-March,2020) and after (April,2020-December,2022) the implementation of a COVID-19 Code Blue policy requiring all team members to don personal protective equipment including gown, gloves, mask, and eye protection for all IHCA. ResultsThere were 800 IHCA with the following characteristics (Before n = 396; After n = 404): mean age 66, 62.9% male, 81.3% witnessed, 31.3% in the emergency department, 25.6% cardiac cause, and initial shockable rhythm in 16.7%. Among all 404 patients screened for COVID-19, 25 of 288 available test results before IHCA occurred were positive. Comparing the before and after periods: there were relevant time delays (min:sec) in start of chest compressions (0:17vs.0:37;p = 0.005), team arrival (0:43vs.1:21;p = 0.002), 1st rhythm analysis (1:15vs.3:16;p < 0.0001), 1st epinephrine (3:44vs.4:34;p = 0.02), and airway insertion (8:38vs. 10:18;p = 0.02). Resuscitation duration was similar (18:28vs.19:35;p = 0.34). Exception of peri-shock pause which appeared longer (0:06vs.0:14;p = 0.07), chest compression fraction, rate and depth were identical and good. Factors independently associated with survival were age (adjOR 0.98;p < 0.001), male sex (adjOR 1.51;p = 0.048), witnessed (adjOR 2.35;p = 0.02), shockable rhythm (adjOR 3.31;p < 0.0001), hospital location (p = 0.0002), and COVID-19 period (adjOR 0.68;p = 0.052). ConclusionsThe COVID-19 Code Blue policy was associated with delayed processes of care but similarly good CPR quality. The COVID-19 period appeared associated with decreased survival.

Kalıpyargı Tehditinin Kardiopulmoner Resüsitasyon Performansı Üzerine Etkisi: Bir Randomize Kontrollü Manken Çalışması

Objective: Stereotype threat (ST) can lead to decreased performance when individuals face the possibility of confirming negative stereotypes associated with their group. During the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, non-Intensive Care Unit physicians (non-ICUp) were assigned to work in ICUs. However, social media emphasized the inadequacy of knowledge and skills among these physicians. Given the negative judgments, the study aimed to evaluate the cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) performances of these physicians and investigate the effect of ST. Methods: A total of 63 non-ICUp and 53 Intensive Care Unit physicians (ICUp) physicians working in COVID-19 ICUs were randomly assigned to control and experimental groups. In the experimental group, ST was manipulated by presenting the study’s aim as measuring the difference in CPR performances between ICUp and non-ICUp physicians. The control group received no information. Participants were videotaped while performing a standard CPR scenario and evaluated by independent instructors and mannequin scores. Results: Overall CPR scores were higher among ICUp. Non-ICUp performed better in the ST condition regarding effective chest compression (p=.02) and correct compression rates per minute (p=.02) compared to the control condition. However, ICUp had lower scores for correctly placing chest compressions in the ST condition (p=.03). Conclusion: The higher CPR performance among ICUp was expected. However, the hypothesis suggesting lower performance for non-ICUp under ST conditions was not supported. Inconsistent results regarding the ST effect could be influenced by moderating factors such as task difficulty, knowledge about the existing stereotype, and motivation to perform well. The interaction between the physicians’ specialty and situational factors highlights the importance of creating realistic training environments that simulate high-pressure situations, ultimately contributing to the development of competent and confident healthcare professionals. Future research should further explore the impact of ST-based training on interactions and performance among different healthcare professionals. Keywords: Stereotype threat, intensive care unit, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, CovId-19

Early intranasal medication administration in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: Two randomized simulation trials.

Intranasal medications have been proposed as adjuncts to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) care. We sought to quantify the effects of intranasal medication administration (INMA) in OHCA workflows. We conducted separate randomized OHCA simulation trials with lay rescuers (LRs) and first responders (FRs). Participants were randomized to groups performing hands-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR)/automated external defibrillator with or without INMA during the second analysis phase. Time to compression following the second shock (CPR2) was the primary outcome and compression quality (chest compression rate (CCR) and fraction (CCF)) was the secondary outcome. We fit linear regression models adjusted for CPR training in the LR group and service years in the FR group. Among LRs, INMA was associated with a significant increase in CPR2 (mean diff. 44.1s, 95% CI: 14.9, 73.3), which persisted after adjustment (p=0.005). We observed a significant decrease in CCR (INMA 95.1 compressions per min (cpm) vs control 104.2cpm, mean diff. -9.1cpm, 95% CI -16.6, -1.6) and CCF (INMA 62.4%vs control 69.8%, mean diff. -7.5%, 95% CI -12.0, -2.9). Among FRs, we found no significant CPR2 delays (mean diff. -2.1s, 95% CI -15.9, 11.7), which persisted after adjustment (p=0.704), or difference in quality (CCR INMA 115.5cpm vs control 120.8cpm, mean diff. -5.3cpm, 95% CI -12.6, 2.0; CCF INMA 79.6%vs control 81.2% mean diff. -1.6%, 95% CI -7.4, 4.3%). INMA in LR resuscitation was associated with diminished resuscitation performance. INMA by FR did not impede key times or quality.

Early Cardiac Arrest Hemodynamics, End-Tidal C o2 , and Outcome in Pediatric Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Secondary Analysis of the ICU-RESUScitation Project Dataset (2016-2021).

Cannulation for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation during active extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) is a method to rescue patients refractory to standard resuscitation. We hypothesized that early arrest hemodynamics and end-tidal C o2 (ET co2 ) are associated with survival to hospital discharge with favorable neurologic outcome in pediatric ECPR patients. Preplanned, secondary analysis of pediatric Utstein, hemodynamic, and ventilatory data in ECPR patients collected during the 2016-2021 Improving Outcomes from Pediatric Cardiac Arrest study; the ICU-RESUScitation Project (ICU-RESUS; NCT02837497). Eighteen ICUs participated in ICU-RESUS. There were 97 ECPR patients with hemodynamic waveforms during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. None. Overall, 71 of 97 patients (73%) were younger than 1 year old, 82 of 97 (85%) had congenital heart disease, and 62 of 97 (64%) were postoperative cardiac surgical patients. Forty of 97 patients (41%) survived with favorable neurologic outcome. We failed to find differences in diastolic or systolic blood pressure, proportion achieving age-based target diastolic or systolic blood pressure, or chest compression rate during the initial 10 minutes of CPR between patients who survived with favorable neurologic outcome and those who did not. Thirty-five patients had ET co2 data; of 17 survivors with favorable neurologic outcome, four of 17 (24%) had an average ET co2 less than 10 mm Hg and two (12%) had a maximum ET co2 less than 10 mm Hg during the initial 10 minutes of resuscitation. We did not identify an association between early hemodynamics achieved by high-quality CPR and survival to hospital discharge with favorable neurologic outcome after pediatric ECPR. Candidates for ECPR with ET co2 less than 10 mm Hg may survive with favorable neurologic outcome.

Comparison between a low-cost model (CPR Pillow) and a mannequin in training hands only cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR): A randomised trial

IntroductionCPR is an important lifesaving skill that can improve outcomes of patients in cardiac arrest. Mass training of hands-only CPR is one of the ways to spread information and teach this skill. Need for expensive CPR mannequins are a limiting factor in conducting such mass training programmes. This study assessed the effectiveness of a low-cost CPR pillow model in training hands-only CPR. MethodologyTwo hundred and six undergraduate students underwent a two-hour CPR training session. They were randomly divided into two groups – mannequin group and CPR pillow group and practiced hands-only CPR on a standard mannequin and a low-cost CPR pillow model, respectively. Knowledge, attitude, and skill acquisition were objectively assessed and compared between the two groups. ResultsThere was no statistical difference in hand positioning, chest compression rate and fraction, depth and overall CPR score between the two groups trained via mannequin and CPR Pillow (P > 0.05). The CPR pillow group had better percentage of chest recoil as compared to the mannequin group (86% vs 73%; P < 0.001). ConclusionThe use of low-cost homemade CPR devices such as our CPR pillow model is an acceptable alternative to mannequin for training hands-only CPR to lay rescuers.

Impact of Personal Protective Equipment on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Rescuer Safety

Background. High-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is a key element in the rescue of cardiac arrest patients but is difficult to achieve in circumstances involving aerosol transmission, such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods. This prospective randomized crossover trial included 30 experienced health care providers to evaluate the impact of personal protective equipment (PPE) on CPR quality and rescuer safety. Participants were asked to perform continuous CPR for 5 minutes on a manikin with three types of PPE: level D-PPE, level C-PPE, and PAPR. The primary outcome was effective chest compression per minute. Secondary outcomes were the fit factor by PortaCount, vital signs and fatigue scores before and after CPR, and perceptions related to wearing PPE. Repeated-measures ANOVA was used, and a two-tailed test value of 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results. The rates of effective chest compressions for 5 minutes with level D-PPE, level C-PPE, and PAPRs were 82.0 ± 0.2%, 78.4 ± 0.2%, and 78.0 ± 0.2%, respectively ( p = 0.584 ). The fit-factor test values of level C-PPE and PAPRs were 182.9 ± 39.9 vs. 198.9 ± 9.2 ( p &lt; 0.001 ). The differences in vital signs before and after CPR were not significantly different among the groups. In addition, the fatigue and total perception scores of wearing PPE were significantly higher for level C-PPE than PAPRs: 3.8 ± 1.6 vs. 3.0 ± 1.6 ( p &lt; 0.001 ) and 27.9 ± 5.4 vs. 26.0 ± 5.3 ( p &lt; 0.001 ), respectively. Conclusion. PAPRs are recommended when performing CPR in situations where aerosol transmission is suspected. When PAPRs are in short supply, individual fit-tested N95 masks are an alternative. This trial is registered with NCT04802109.

Chest compression quality comparing 1-min vs 2-min rotation of rescuers wearing N95 masks

BackgroundDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) performed by rescuers wearing well-sealed respirators such as N95 masks, was associated with significant reduction in the chest compression rate and depth. This was attributed to fatigue during the standard 2-min rescuer rotations. We hypothesized that in such situations, rotating rescuers every one minute, instead of the standard two minutes would improve CPR quality. AimTo compare the quality of chest compressions when rescuers wearing N95 masks are rotated every one minute, instead of the standard practice of two-minute rotations. MethodsA randomized, controlled, crossover trial was conducted, with the approval of the institutional Ethics Committee. Medical students who volunteered as rescuers were trained to perform high-quality chest compressions on a manikin, and then randomly allocated into pairs. Each pair was randomized to one of two trial groups viz. one-minute rotations crossed-over to two-minute rotations; and vice versa. Thus, each pair performed CPR with one-minute rotations, as well as two-minute rotations Each CPR session included chest compressions for a duration of 12 min. The outcome parameters included CPR quality, compression depth, compression rate, and chest compression fraction. Rescuer fatigue was measured before and after each study session using the modified Borg scale. ResultsFifty-six participants completed the study. The overall CPR quality was statistically similar in the study arms (median 88% vs. 81%, p = 0.09). However, the minute-to-minute inter-arm comparison revealed significantly lower CPR quality in the 2-min rotation arm, at the end of minutes 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 (respective p-values 0.03, 0.001, 0.008, 0.02, 0.002). A similar trend was observed in compression depth also. Rescuer fatigue score was significantly less with 1-min rotations compared to 2-min rotations (p < 0.001). Rescuer vital signs and cardiorespiratory parameters were not different with the two types of rotations. ConclusionDuring CPR performed by rescuers wearing N95 masks, the quality of CPR appears to be superior with rescuers rotating at 1-min instead of 2-min intervals. More frequent rotation was also associated with less rescuer fatigue.