Anal Sphincter Preservation Rate Research Articles

Importance of comprehensive management of anastomotic site after ultra-low anal sphincter-preservation surgery

Intersphincteric resection (ISR) surgery increases the rate of anal sphincter preservation in patients with ultra-low rectal cancers. However, the anastomotic site of ISR surgery is at risk for structural healing complications such as anastomotic leakage, anastomotic dehiscence, secondary anastomotic stenosis, chronic presacral sinus, rectovaginal fistula, and rectourethral fistula, which can lead to a persistent defunctioning ostomy or a secondary permanent colostomy. This article systematically describes the preoperative high-risk factors and characteristics of anastomotic site structural healing complications after ISR surgery, as well as the management of the anastomotic site during various stages including hospitalization, from discharge to one month after surgery, from one month after surgery to before stoma reversal, and after stoma reversal. This is to provide a clearer understanding of the risks associated with the anastomotic site at different stages of the healing process and to timely detect and actively manage related complications, thereby reducing the rate of permanent colostomy and truly achieving the dual goals of "survival benefit" and "quality of life improvement" in ISR surgery.

Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation for Rectal Cancer Achieves Satisfactory Tumour Regression and Local Recurrence – Result of a Dedicated Multi-disciplinary Approach from a South Asian Centre

BackgroundPre-operative long-course chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for rectal cancer has resulted in improvement in rates of restorative rectal resection and local recurrence by inducing tumour downstaging and downsizing. Total mesorectal excision (TME) is a standardised surgical technique of low anterior resection aimed at the prevention of local tumour recurrence. The purpose of this study was to evaluate tumour response following CRT in a standardised group of patients with rectal cancer.MethodsOne hundred and thirty-one patients (79 male; 52 female, median age 57; interquartile range 47–62 years) of 153 with rectal cancer who underwent pre-operative long-course CRT were treated by standardised open low anterior resection at a median of 10 weeks post-CRT. Sixteen of 131 (12%) were 70 years or older. Median follow-up at the time of analysis was 15 months (interquartile range 6–45 months). Pathology reports were analysed based on AJCC-UICC classification using the TNM system. Data recorded were overall/subgrades of tumour regression; good, moderate or poor, lymph node harvest, local recurrence, disease-free and overall survival using standard statistical methods.Results78% showed tumour regression post-CRT; 43% displayed good tumour regression/response while 22% had poor tumour regression/response. All patients had a pre-operative T-stage of either T3 or T4. Post-operation, good responders had a median T stage of T2 vs. T3 in poor responders (P = 0.0002). Overall, the median lymph node harvest was < 12. There was no difference in the number of nodes harvested in good vs. poor responders (Good/moderate-6 nodes vs. Poor- 8; P = 0.31). Good responders tended to have a lesser number of malignant nodes vs. poor responders (P = 0.31). Overall, local recurrence was 6.8% and the anal sphincter preservation rate was 89%. Predicted 5-year disease-free and overall survival were similar between good and poor responders.ConclusionLong-course CRT resulted in satisfactory tumour regression and enabled consideration for safe, sphincter-saving resection in rectal cancer. A dedicated multi-disciplinary team approach achieved a global benchmark for local recurrence in a resource-limited setting.

Responses of Patients with T3-4N0- 2 M0 Rectal Cancer to Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy: Review of Current Literature

Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of chemoradiotherapy and radiotherapy followed by surgery in patients with locally advanced unresectable rectal cancer.Material and method: We reviewed records for 65 patients with locally advanced unresectable rectal cancer treated by preoperative chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy followed by surgery between 2013 and 2016. Of these, 23 patients were treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy (40 - 45 Gy) plus concomitant chemotherapy (5Fluorouracil + Calcium Folinate). For comparison, 42 similar patients, treated by preoperative radiotherapy (45 - 50Gy) plus surgery served as control. The primary end-point of the study was overall survival and local control rate.Results: No treatment plan was delayed because of toxicities in both groups. The radical resectability rate was 69.9 % in the chemoradiotherapy group and 33.3 % in the radiotherapy plus surgery group (P = 0. 024). The anal sphincter preservation rates were 26. 6 % and 3. 7 %, respectively (P= 0. 028). The anal sphincter preservation rates of the lower rectal cancer were 27. 3 % and 0. 0 %, respectively (P = 0. 014). Response rates of chemoradiotherapy and radiotherapy plus surgery groups were 82.6 % and 61.9 % (P = 0. 053). The tumor downstage rates were 16 (69.6%) and 24 (57.1%) in these groups (P = 0. 206). The 3-years overall survival rates were 66. 7 % and 55. 6 % (P = 0. 485), and the tumor-free survival rates were 40. 3 % and 33. 1 % (P = 0. 663) . The 3-years local recurrent rates were 26. 9 % and 48. 1 % (P = 0. 174) . No obvious late effects were found in either group. Conclusion: The results of this study suggested at least that acute side effects of preoperative chemoradiotherapy can be tolerated and a higher surgical resection rate can be achieved. However, the chemoradiotherapy did not improve the survival rate while it increased local recurrence due to the high rate of anal sphincter preservation. It is safe and effective to use 5-Fluorouracil + Calcium Folinate and 5 – DFUR as a radiosensitizer during the whole course of radiotherapy.

Tolerability and safety of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy with S-1 after limited surgery for T1 or T2 lower rectal cancer.

Chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) after local excision for pT1 with high-risk features or pT2 rectal cancer is recommended as an optional treatment to achieve both curability and maintenance of quality of life. The aim of this study was to evaluate the short-term safety of combining limited surgery with adjuvant CRT for T1 or T2 lower rectal cancer. This was a multicenter, single-arm, prospective phase II trial. Patients diagnosed with lower rectal or anal canal cancer (clinical T1 or T2 with a maximum diameter of 30mm and N0 and M0) underwent local excision or endoscopic resection. Patients received CRT with S-1 (tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil) after confirmation of well- or moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma, and negative margins, and/or depth of submucosal invasion ≥ 1000µm or muscularis propria, and/or positive lymphovascular invasion, and/or tumor budding grade of 2/3. The primary endpoint was relapse-free survival. Secondary endpoints included overall and local relapse-free survival, safety, anal sphincter preservation rate, and anal function. Pathological diagnosis was T1 in 36 patients and T2 in 16 patients. Serious complications after surgery were not reported. The CRT completion rate per protocol was 86.5% (45/52). Thirty-two patients developed 54 events of CRT-related adverse events, including only one patient with a grade 3 event (stomatitis). The most common CRT-related adverse event was diarrhea (n = 14). No patients showed deterioration of anal function at 3years postoperatively. CRT with S-1 after limited surgery for T1 or T2 lower rectal cancer resulted in a low incidence of toxicities and maintenance of anal function.

Transanal versus nontransanal surgery for the treatment of primary rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a 10-year experience in a high-volume center.

BackgroundRectal gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is a rare digestive disease that has a distinct malignant tendency compared to that of gastric-derived GIST. At present, there is still no standard, and the surgical approach to rectal GIST is controversial.MethodsThe clinicopathological data and prognosis of rectal GIST patients admitted to the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from 1998.01.01 to 2018.12.31 were collected retrospectively. All cases were divided into either the transanal (TA) group or the nontransanal (NTA) group.ResultsA total of 537 GIST cases were treated in 10 years, including 82 rectal GIST cases (64 cases underwent surgical resection, including 29 cases in the TA group and 35 cases in the NTA group). Preoperative neoadjuvant therapy (P=0.003), postoperative adjuvant therapy (P=0.017), operative time (P=0.013), blood loss (P=0.038), anus-preserver (P=0.048), 30-day complication rate (P=0.000), time to flatus (P=0.036), hospital stays (P=0.011), distance from the anus (P=0.047), tumor size (P=0.002), mitotic count (P=0.035) and National Institutes of Health (NIH) criteria (P=0.000) were significantly different between these two groups (all P<0.05). The median follow-up time was 41 (range, 1–122) months. Twelve patients had recurrence and metastasis, and 4 patients died. The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were 74.4% and 91.2%, respectively, in the whole group. There were no statistically significant differences between the TA group and the NTA group at 5-year DFS (81.3% vs. 79.0%, P=0.243) and OS (88.7% vs. 93.3%, P=0.308).ConclusionsIn the treatment of rectal GIST, TA resection has a minimally invasive effect, less postoperative complications, high anal sphincter preservation rate, and R0 resection rate and a better prognosis. How to improve the proportion of neoadjuvant therapy and choose the appropriate cases for TA surgery is still a challenge.

Application of endoscopic tattooing with carbon nanoparticlet in the treatment for advanced colorectal cancer

Application of endoscopic tattooing with carbon nanoparticlet in the treatment for advanced colorectal cancer

Postoperative short-term complications of laparoscope-assisted transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy and their management: a single center report

To summarize and analyze the postoperative short-term complications of laparoscope-assisted transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) for rectal cancer patients after neoadjuvant therapy. A prospectively established database on taTME patients at Peking University Cancer Hospital was screened with the following conditions: data retrieval from June 2016 to August 2018, pathologically confirmed adenocarcinoma, receiving preoperative neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy. The transabdominal procedure and the transanal procedure were performed simultaneously in the taTME operation. Occurrence of complications during perioperative period (within postoperative 3 months) in these patients, especially anastomosis-related complications and their management were analyzed. The relevant complications were recorded according to the Clavien-Dindo (CD) grading criteria. The severity of anastomotic leakage and anastomotic stenosis was evaluated according to criteria developed by the International Rectal Cancer Research Group. A total of 29 patients were enrolled in this study. In the 29 patients, 25 (86.2%) were male and 4 (13.8%) were female, the median age was 60 (range, 30 to 72) years, the median body mass index was 25.8 (range, 19.8 to 36.4) kg/m2, the median distance from the tumor to anal verge was 4 (range, 2 to 8) cm. All the patients completed laparoscope-assisted taTME operations successfully without conversion to laparotomy, intra-operative severe complication or death. The median operation time was 300 (range, 198 to 405) minutes, and the median intra-operative blood loss was 100 (range, 50 to 200) ml. All the TME specimens were complete according to the Nagtegaal standard. All the patients underwent prophylactic ileostomy. Hartmann procedure was performed in one case due to poor blood supply in the proximal bowel without the possibility of anastomosis. Anal sphincter preservation rate was 96.6% (28/29). The median postoperative exhaust time was 2 (range, 1 to 10) days, and the median postoperative hospital stay was 9 (range, 7 to 24) days. Fifteen patients (51.7%) had postoperative complications, among which serious complication (CD grade IIIb and above) accounted for 6.9% (2/29). No perioperative death was observed. Five patients (17.2%) presented anastomosis-related complications, including 2 cases of grade C anastomotic leakage due to anastomotic rupture, who underwent abdominal perineal resection 1 month after operation; 2 cases of grade B anastomotic leakage, who improved after conservative treatment; 1 case of grade A anastomotic stenosis, who improved with anal expansion 1 month after operation. The incidence of postoperative infection was 24.1% (7/29), including 6 cases of pelvic infection and 1 case of trocar site infection, all of which were CD grade II. One case had incomplete intestinal obstruction (CD grade II); 1 case had gastroplegia; 1 case had abdominal trocar hernia. All the patients were followed up for a median of 12.0 (range, 3.9 to 29.9) months. Seven cases did not undergo ileal stoma closure. The anal sphincter preservation rate was 75.9% (22/29). Pelvic infection and anastomosis-related complications are common after laparoscope-assisted taTME surgery for rectal cancer patients following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, which require active management and appropriate treatment.

Effects of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy on the rates of sphincter preserving surgery in lower rectal cancer and analysis of their prognostic factors

Objectives: To identify independent factors of sphincter preserving surgery, and to evaluated whether preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) improves the sphincter preservation rate for lower rectal cancers. Methods: A total of 541 consecutive patients who underwent curative surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer (cT3-4Nx or cTxN+ ) within 6 cm of the anal verge with or without neoadjuvant CRT in Department of Colorectal Surgery, Union Hospital, Fujian Medical University between September 2000 and September 2013 were reviewed. Of these, 333 patients underwent surgery alone (Non-CRT group) and 208 patients also received preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT group). Clinical data were retrospectively reviewed to determine the factors influencing sphincter preservation, and to evaluate sphincter preservation rate according to tumor height over 1-cm intervals. The categorical variables were compared using χ2 test and Fisher exact test. Continuous variables were compared using t test. Logistic regression was used to identify factors influencing sphincter preservation. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed, and Youden's index was calculated to evaluate the predictive abilities of factors. Results: Multivariate analysis indicated that the independent factors influencing sphincter preservation were tumor height (OR=5.867, 95% CI: 4.155 to 8.285, P=0.000), pathological T stage (OR=0.688, 95% CI: 0.462 to 1.025, P=0.066), CRT (OR=2.088, 95% CI: 0.971 to 4.492, P=0.060) and histopathological type (OR=0.288, 95% CI: 0.136 to 0.611, P=0.001). The results of ROC analysis showed that the cut-off points for factors affecting sphincter preservation were as follows: (1) tumor height prior to CRT higher than 4.5 cm, (2) not mucinous or signet ring adenocarcinoma, (3) pathological T stage higher than T3, (4) had received preoperative CRT. In an analysis according to tumor height, the sphincter preservation rate was higher in CRT group only when tumor was located in 3.0 to 3.9 cm and 4.0 to 4.9 cm from the annal verge (3.0 to 3.9 cm, 59.4% vs. 2.8%, χ2=26.138, P=0.000; 4.0 to 4.9 cm, 76.9% vs. 37.9%, χ2=10.563, P=0.001). Conclusions: There is a large increased rate of sphincter preservation when patients meet the following conditions: (1) tumor height prior to CRT higher than 4.5 cm, (2) not mucinous or signet ring adenocarcinoma, (3)pathological T stage higher than T3, (4) had received preoperative CRT. Only when tumors are between 3 and 5 cm from the anal verge, CRT could increase the rate of anal sphincter preservation.

Surgical treatment for locally advanced lower third rectal cancer after neoadjuvent chemoradiation with capecitabine: prospective phase II trial

IntroductionTreatment of rectal cancer requires a multidisciplinary approach with standardized surgical, pathological and radiotherapeutic procedures. Sphincter preserving surgery for cancer of the lower rectum needs a long-course of neoadjuvant treatments to reduce tumor volume, to induce down-staging that increases circumferential resection margin, and to facilitate surgery.AimTo evaluate the rate of anal sphincter preservation in low lying, resectable, locally advanced rectal cancer and the resectability rate in unresectable cases after neoadjuvent chemoradiation by oral Capecitabine.Patients and methodsThis trial included 43 patients with low lying (4–7 cm from anal verge) locally advanced rectal cancer, of which 33 were resectable. All patients received preoperative concurrent chemoradiation (45 Gy/25 fractions over 5 weeks with oral capecitabine 825 mg/m2 twice daily on radiotherapy days), followed after 4–6 weeks by total mesorectal excision technique.ResultsPreoperative chemoradiation resulted in a complete pathologic response in 4 patients (9.3%; 95% CI 3–23.1) and an overall downstaging in 32 patients (74.4%; 95% CI 58.5–85). Sphincter sparing surgical procedures were done in 20 out of 43 patients (46.5%; 95% CI 31.5–62.2). The majority (75%) were of clinical T3 disease. Toxicity was moderate and required no treatment interruption. Grade II anemia occurred in 4 patients (9.3%, 95% CI 3–23.1), leucopenia in 2 patients (4.7%, 95% CI 0.8–17) and radiation dermatitis in 4 patients (9.3%, 95% CI 3–23.1) respectively.ConclusionIn patients with low lying, locally advanced rectal cancer, preoperative chemoradiation using oral capecitabine 825 mg/m2, twice a day on radiotherapy days, was tolerable and effective in downstaging and resulted in 46.5% anal sphincter preservation rate.

Analysis of Anal Sphincter Preservation Rate According to Tumor Level and Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Rectal Cancer Patients

The anal sphincter preservation rate (ASPR) according to tumor level and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherpy (CRT) has not been fully evaluated. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation between the tumor level, neoadjuvant CRT, and the ASPR in rectal cancer patients. We studied 544 patients (tumor level, 0–6 cm) who underwent curative resection for rectal cancer between 1991 and 2005. Patients were divided six into groups according to tumor level over 1-cm intervals, and the ASPR was evaluated in patients with and without neoadjuvant CRT according to tumor level. Sphincter preservation surgery was performed in 191 patients, and 86 patents underwent neoadjuvant CRT. The overall ASPR was 43.0% (37/86) in patients with neoadjuvant CRT and 33.6% (154/458) in patients without neoadjuvant CRT (P = 0.094). In an analysis according to tumor level, the ASPR was 0.0 vs 0.0% in ≤1 cm, 0.0 vs 2.1% in 1 ≤ 2 cm (P = 0.589), 11.8 vs 16.8% in 2 ≤ 3 cm (P = 0.599), 55.6 vs 20.2% in 3 ≤ 4 cm (P = 0.001), 57.7 vs 45.9% in 4 ≤ 5 cm (P = 0.227), and 66.7 vs 69.5% in 5 ≤ 6 cm (P = 0.827). Neoadjuvant CRT did not increase the ASPR in tumor level within ≤6 cm. However, for the tumor level (3 ≤ 4 cm), neoadjuvant CRT significantly increased the ASPR.

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy as neoadjuvant therapy for 35 patients with locally advanced lower rectal carcinoma

To explore the effect of combined preoperative chemotherapy with radiotherapy on locally advanced lower rectal carcinoma. Thirty- five patients with locally advanced lower rectal carcinoma were received a new regimen of combined preoperative chemotherapy with radiotherapy. Routine fr action of radiation was given with total dose of 46 Gy,2 Gy per fraction,five ti mes a week. Patients received oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) (infusion) on day 1, plus leu novorin 200 mg/m(2) and 5- FU 500 mg/m(2)(intravenous bolus) from day 1 to day 3 eve ry 3 weeks for total two cycles before irradiation. Operation was performed 4 to 6 weeks later after neoadjuvant therapy. After neoadjuvant therapy,all patients underwent surgical resection with complete pathologic response in 7 patients,average tumor size decrease of in 34.4%, tumor stage decrease in 65.7% o f patients and nodal- negative change rate of 55.6%. Radical resection was per formed in 34 patients,in whom 18 patients received abdominoperineal resection(AP R) and 16 patients received sphincter- preserving surgery with 45.7% of anal preservation rate. One patient received palliative resection. No local recurrence occurred in all patients who received radical resection,but two cases had liver metastasis. Combined preoperative chemotherapy with radiotherapy is a better neoadjuvant therapy for lower advanced rectal cancer,which can decrease tumor stage,improve resectability and anal sphincter preservation rate,therefore ,this new neoadjuvant therapy with tolerable toxicity will has a promising application in the clinical setting.