Event Abstract Back to Event Promoting chondroinduction with naturally derived hydrogel pastes Emily Beck1, Marilyn Barragan2, Madeleine H. Tadros3, Stevin H. Gehrke1, 4, Sarah L. Kieweg1, 5, Cory J. Berkland1, 4, 6 and Michael S. Detamore1, 4 1 University of Kansas, Bioengineering Program, United States 2 University of Kansas, Department of Molecular Biosciences, United States 3 Rice University, Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, United States 4 University of Kansas, Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, United States 5 University of Kansas, Department of Mechanical Engineering, United States 6 University of Kansas, Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, United States Introduction: ECM-based materials are gaining wide attention in the tissue engineering field due to their ability to support cellular attachment, growth, and differentiation[1]. Although ECM materials have been incorporated into hydrogels and show great promise, hydrogels also have one major drawback because their precursors are liquid solutions that are prone to leaking after surgical placement[2]. Therefore, in this work, we mixed porcine devitalized cartilage (DVC) particles into methacrylated, solubilized, devitalized, porcine cartilage (MeSDVC) to achieve a hydrogel precursor that was not only paste-like to overcome the drawbacks of traditional hydrogels, but additionally to achieve a hydrogel that would induce chondrogensis and could be further crosslinked and analyzed. Methods: Porcine cartilage that was devitalized and cryoground into a fine powder was mixed with devitalized cartilage that was solubilized and then methacrylated, and the precursors were analyzed rheologically for yield stress. Formulations tested rheologically were 5% DVC, 10% DVC, 10% MeSDVC, 10% MeSDVC 10% DVC, and 10% MeSDVC 10% DVC + TGF-β3. The formulations containing MeSDVC were then mixed with rat bone marrow stem cells and UV crosslinked to further characterize them as solids. The gels were cultured in vitro for 6 weeks, where chondrogenic gene expression, the compressive modulus, swelling, and histology were also analyzed. Results and Discussion: All formulations tested exhibited a yield stress, where the yield stress of 10% MeSDVC and 10% DVC were 725 ± 55 and 57.9 ± 0.3, respectively. When 10% MeSDVC and 10% DVC were mixed, the yield stress increased by a factor of 2.6 compared to 10% MeSDVC alone (p<0.05). Because the yield stress is not additive, it suggests that there is some physiological or chemical interaction between MeSDVC and DVC that is creating the synergistic yield stress effect. After crosslinking, the only gels that were noted to not have contraction throughout culture were the gels containing DVC particles. At the 2 week and 3 week time points, Sox-9 and aggrecan expression were significantly higher in the DVC groups (p<0.05) and by 6 weeks, the relative collagen II expressions of the 10% MeSDVC 10% DVC and the 10% MeSDVC 10% DVC + TGF-β3 groups were 78 and 40 fold higher than 10% MeSDVC alone, respectively (p<0.05). The compressive moduli of all but one group ranged between 70 and 160 kPa, although the 20% MeSDVC acellular group had a modulus of 680 ± 130 kPa, which is much closer to that of native cartilage. Finally, aggrecan immunohistological staining showed increased staining around the cells at 6 weeks in the growth factor supplemented and the 10% MeSDVC group. Conclusion: Given that the mixtures of MeSDVC and DVC combined yielded hydrogel precursors that exhibited a yield stress and crosslinked to form hydrogels that did not contract over time, stimulated chondroinductive gene expression, as well as had a compressive moduli on the same order of magnitude as native cartilage, these MeSDVC and DVC mixtures may be promising materials for translational cartilage tissue engineering applications. NIH S10 RR024664; NSF Graduate Research Fellowship (E.B.); NSF Major Research Instrumentation Grant (0320648); Kansas Bioscience Authority Rising Star Award (M.D.); NIH R01 DE022472 (C.B.)