Ras Family Small GTPases Research Articles

Abstract IA-07: RAS mutation tropism: insight into tumor initation

Abstract How we get cancer, a process termed tumor initiation, remains an enigma, which has crucial clinical implications for early detection, prevention, and interception. Backtracking to catch the moment a specific mutagenic event in a single gene from an individual cell occurred decades before manifesting as cancer is challenging. However, the RAS family of small GTPases thate are commonly mutated in cancer provide some insight. Despite over 50 possible oncogenic RAS mutations, each cancer type exhibits a predilection or ‘tropism’ towards a distinct and often unique subset of these mutations. For example, most pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas are driven by a G12D/V mutation in KRAS. As RAS mutations are often initiating, this tropism ostensibly reflects the fundamental biology underlying tumor initiation, which becomes embedded in the genome of the resulting tumors. Fortunately, the process of RAS mutation tropism can be studied in mice exposed to the environmental carcinogen urethane. Such carcinogenesis both captures the moment of tumor initiation (the point of carcinogen exposure) and displays RAS mutation tropism (lung lesions are induced by a specific RAS mutation). By using ultra-sensitive sequencing to detect mutations immediately after urethane exposure in different mouse genetic backgrounds, we find that the mutagenic bias of this carcinogen influences the type of RAS mutations generated. However, biological selection for an optimal or ‘sweet spot’ of oncogenic signaling ultimately appears to dictate which mutations go on to initiate tumorigenesis. Analysis of sequence datasets from human lung cancer suggests a similar dominant role for biological selection in the RAS mutation tropism of this cancer. In summary, RAS mutation tropism appears to be a combination of mutational bias, and even more so, biological selection, providing critical insights into the origins of cancers like pancreatic. Citation Format: Christopher M Counter. RAS mutation tropism: insight into tumor initation [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Advances in Pancreatic Cancer Research; 2024 Sep 15-18; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(17 Suppl_2):Abstract nr IA-07.

Differential Lipid Binding Specificities of RAP1A and RAP1B are Encoded by the Amino Acid Sequence of the Membrane Anchors.

RAP1 proteins belong to the RAS family of small GTPases that operate as molecular switches by cycling between GDP-bound inactive and GTP-bound active states. The C-terminal anchors of RAP1 proteins are known to direct membrane localization, but how these anchors organize RAP1 on the plasma membrane (PM) has not been investigated. Using high-resolution imaging, we show that RAP1A and RAP1B form spatially segregated nanoclusters on the inner leaflet of the PM, with further lateral segregation between GDP-bound and GTP-bound proteins. The C-terminal polybasic anchors of RAP1A and RAP1B differ in their amino acid sequences and exhibit different lipid binding specificities, which can be modified by single-point mutations in the respective polybasic domains (PBD). Molecular dynamics simulations reveal that single PBD mutations substantially reduce the interactions of the membrane anchors with the PM lipid phosphatidylserine. In summary, we show that aggregate lipid binding specificity encoded within the C-terminal anchor determines PM association and nanoclustering of RAP1A and RAP1B. Taken together with previous observations on RAC1 and KRAS, the study reveals that the PBD sequences of small GTPase membrane anchors can encode distinct lipid binding specificities that govern PM interactions.

Leep2A and Leep2B function as a RasGAP complex to regulate macropinosome formation.

Macropinocytosis mediates the non-selective bulk uptake of extracellular fluid, enabling cells to survey the environment and obtain nutrients. A conserved set of signaling proteins orchestrates the actin dynamics that lead to membrane ruffling and macropinosome formation across various eukaryotic organisms. At the center of this signaling network are Ras GTPases, whose activation potently stimulates macropinocytosis. However, how Ras signaling is initiated and spatiotemporally regulated during macropinocytosis is not well understood. By using the model system Dictyostelium and a proteomics-based approach to identify regulators of macropinocytosis, we uncovered Leep2, consisting of Leep2A and Leep2B, as a RasGAP complex. The Leep2 complex specifically localizes to emerging macropinocytic cups and nascent macropinosomes, where it modulates macropinosome formation by regulating the activities of three Ras family small GTPases. Deletion or overexpression of the complex, as well as disruption or sustained activation of the target Ras GTPases, impairs macropinocytic activity. Our data reveal the critical role of fine-tuning Ras activity in directing macropinosome formation.

Oncogenic Control of Metabolism.

A cell committed to proliferation must reshape its metabolism to enable robust yet balanced production of building blocks for the assembly of proteins, lipids, nucleic acids, and other macromolecules, from which two functional daughter cells can be produced. The metabolic remodeling associated with proliferation is orchestrated by a number of pro-proliferative signaling nodes, which include phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase (PI3K), the RAS family of small GTPases, and transcription factor c-myc In metazoan cells, these signals are activated in a paracrine manner via growth factor-mediated activation of receptor (or receptor-associated) tyrosine kinases. Such stimuli are limited in duration and therefore allow the metabolism of target cells to return to the resting state once the proliferation demands have been satisfied. Cancer cells acquire activating genetic alterations within common pro-proliferative signaling nodes. These alterations lock cellular nutrient uptake and utilization into a perpetual progrowth state, leading to the aberrant accumulation and spread of cancer cells.

Interactions between Ras and Rap signaling pathways during neurodevelopment in health and disease.

The Ras family of small GTPases coordinates tissue development by modulating cell proliferation, cell-cell adhesion, and cellular morphology. Perturbations of any of these key steps alter nervous system development and are associated with neurological disorders. While the underlying causes are not known, genetic mutations in Ras and Rap GTPase signaling pathways have been identified in numerous neurodevelopmental disorders, including autism spectrum, neurofibromatosis, intellectual disability, epilepsy, and schizophrenia. Despite diverse clinical presentations, intersections between these two signaling pathways may provide a better understanding of how deviations in neurodevelopment give rise to neurological disorders. In this review, we focus on presynaptic and postsynaptic functions of Ras and Rap GTPases. We highlight various roles of these small GTPases during synapse formation and plasticity. Based on genomic analyses, we discuss how disease-related mutations in Ras and Rap signaling proteins may underlie human disorders. Finally, we discuss how recent observations have identified molecular interactions between these pathways and how these findings may provide insights into the mechanisms that underlie neurodevelopmental disorders.

A pan-cancer analysis implicates human NKIRAS1 as a tumor-suppressor gene.

The NF-κB family of transcription factors and the Ras family of small GTPases are important mediators of proproliferative signaling that drives tumorigenesis and carcinogenesis. The κB-Ras proteins were previously shown to inhibit both NF-κB and Ras activation through independent mechanisms, implicating them as tumor suppressors with potentially broad relevance to human cancers. In this study, we have used two mouse models to establish the relevance of the κB-Ras proteins for tumorigenesis. Additionally, we have utilized a pan-cancer bioinformatics analysis to explore the role of the κB-Ras proteins in human cancers. Surprisingly, we find that the genes encoding κB-Ras 1 (NKIRAS1) and κB-Ras 2 (NKIRAS2) are rarely down-regulated in tumor samples with oncogenic Ras mutations. Reduced expression of human NKIRAS1 alone is associated with worse prognosis in at least four cancer types and linked to a network of genes implicated in tumorigenesis. Our findings provide direct evidence that loss of NKIRAS1 in human tumors that do not carry oncogenic RAS mutations is associated with worse clinical outcomes.

Conformational ensemble-dependent lipid recognition and segregation by prenylated intrinsically disordered regions in small GTPases

We studied diverse prenylated intrinsically disordered regions (PIDRs) of Ras and Rho family small GTPases using long timescale atomistic molecular dynamics simulations in an asymmetric model membrane of phosphatidylcholine (PC) and phosphatidylserine (PS) lipids. Here we show that conformational plasticity is a key determinant of lipid sorting by polybasic PIDRs and provide evidence for lipid sorting based on both headgroup and acyl chain structures. We further show that conformational ensemble-based lipid recognition is generalizable to all polybasic PIDRs, and that the sequence outside the polybasic domain (PBD) modulates the conformational plasticity, bilayer adsorption, and interactions of PIDRs with membrane lipids. Specifically, we find that palmitoylation, the ratio of basic to acidic residues, and the hydrophobic content of the sequence outside the PBD significantly impact the diversity of conformational substates and hence the extent of conformation-dependent lipid interactions. We thus propose that the PBD is required but not sufficient for the full realization of lipid sorting by prenylated PBD-containing membrane anchors, and that the membrane anchor is not only responsible for high affinity membrane binding but also directs the protein to the right target membrane where it participates in lipid sorting.

Biochemical and biophysical characterization of the RAS family small GTPase protein DiRAS3

DiRAS3, also called ARHI, is a RAS (sub)family small GTPase protein that shares 50–60% sequence identity with H-, K-, and N-RAS, with substitutions in key conserved G-box motifs and a unique 34 amino acid extension at its N-terminus. Unlike the RAS proto-oncogenes, DiRAS3 exhibits tumor suppressor properties. DiRAS3 function has been studied through genetics and cell biology, but there has been a lack of understanding of the biochemical and biophysical properties of the protein, likely due to its instability and poor solubility. To overcome this solubility issue, we engineered a DiRAS3 variant (C75S/C80S), which significantly improved soluble protein expression in E. coli. Recombinant DiRAS3 was purified by Ni-NTA and size exclusion chromatography (SEC). Concentration dependence of the SEC chromatogram indicated that DiRAS3 exists in monomer-dimer equilibrium. We then produced truncations of the N-terminal (ΔN) and both (ΔNC) extensions to the GTPase domain. Unlike full-length DiRAS3, the SEC profiles showed that ΔNC is monomeric while ΔN was monomeric with aggregation, suggesting that the N and/or C-terminal tail(s) contribute to dimerization and aggregation. The 1H–15N HSQC NMR spectrum of ΔNC construct displayed well-dispersed peaks similar to spectra of other GTPase domains, which enabled us to demonstrate that DiRAS3 has a GTPase domain that can bind GDP and GTP. Taken together, we conclude that, despite the substitutions in the G-box motifs, DiRAS3 can switch between nucleotide-bound states and that the N- and C-terminal extensions interact transiently with the GTPase domain in intra- and inter-molecular fashions, mediating weak multimerization of this unique small GTPase.

Genomic Landscapes and Hallmarks of Mutant RAS in Human Cancers.

The complex genomic landscape of RAS-mutant tumors is reflective of selection processes in a cancer lineage-specific and context-dependent manner, highlighting differential therapeutic vulnerabilities that can be clinically translated.

Rap2a Is Negatively Regulated by NF-κB and Contributes to Growth via Wnt Pathway in Shrimp

Rap2a, a member of Ras family small GTPases, plays a key role in growth and development. So far, no Rap2a homolog has been discovered in crustaceans. Herein, a Rap2a homolog from shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei, named LvRap2a, was cloned and identified. LvRap2a showed a high level of sequence conservation to other Rap2a homologs from different species. LvRap2a was found to be abundantly expressed in hemocytes, muscle, hepatopancreas and intestine tissues. Importantly, Rap2a knockdown effectively suppressed the length and weight of shrimp in a growth experiment. Mechanistically, we found that Rap2a could induce the expression of several Wnts, which are the positive regulators in cellular growth, differentiation, and tissue homeostasis. Moreover, LvRap2a expression was observed to be negatively regulated by LvDorsal (NF-κB), a transcription factor of innate immune signaling pathway. These results indicated that LvRap2a contributed to shrimp growth probably by activating the Wnt signaling pathway, and that LvRap2a could be the crosstalk between innate immunity and growth, as well as that LvRap2a could serve as a potential target for shrimp growth promotion.

SFPQ promotes RAS-mutant cancer cell growth by modulating 5'-UTR mediated translational control of CK1α.

Oncogenic mutations in the RAS family of small GTPases are commonly found in human cancers and they promote tumorigenesis by altering gene expression networks. We previously demonstrated that Casein Kinase 1α (CK1α), a member of the CK1 family of serine/threonine kinases, is post-transcriptionally upregulated by oncogenic RAS signaling. Here, we report that the CK1α mRNA contains an exceptionally long 5′-untranslated region (UTR) harbouring several translational control elements, implicating its involvement in translational regulation. We demonstrate that the CK1α 5′-UTR functions as an IRES element in HCT-116 colon cancer cells to promote cap-independent translation. Using tobramycin-affinity RNA-pulldown assays coupled with identification via mass spectrometry, we identified several CK1α 5′-UTR-binding proteins, including SFPQ. We show that RNA interference targeting SFPQ reduced CK1α protein abundance and partially blocked RAS-mutant colon cancer cell growth. Importantly, transcript and protein levels of SFPQ and other CK1α 5′-UTR-associated RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) are found to be elevated in early stages of RAS-mutant cancers, including colorectal and lung adenocarcinoma. Taken together, our study uncovers a previously unappreciated role of RBPs in promoting RAS-mutant cancer cell growth and their potential to serve as promising biomarkers as well as tractable therapeutic targets in cancers driven by oncogenic RAS.

Structure of the glucosyltransferase domain of TcdA in complex with RhoA provides insights into substrate recognition

Clostridioides difficile is one of the most common causes of antibiotic-associated diarrhea in developed countries. As key virulence factors of C. difficile, toxin A (TcdA) and toxin B (TcdB) act by glucosylating and inactivating Rho and Ras family small GTPases in host cells, which leads to actin cytoskeleton disruption, cell rounding, and ultimately cell death. Here we present the co-crystal structure of the glucosyltransferase domain (GTD) of TcdA in complex with its substrate human RhoA at 2.60-angstrom resolution. This structure reveals that TcdA GTD grips RhoA mainly through its switch I and switch II regions, which is complemented by interactions involving RhoA’s pre-switch I region. Comprehensive structural comparisons between the TcdA GTD–RhoA complex and the structures of TcdB GTD in complex with Cdc42 and R-Ras reveal both the conserved and divergent features of these two toxins in terms of substrate recognition. Taken together, these findings establish the structural basis for TcdA recognition of small GTPases and advance our understanding of the substrates selectivity of large clostridial toxins.

Structural insights into Ras regulation by SIN1

Over the years it has been established that SIN1, a key component of mTORC2, could interact with Ras family small GTPases through its Ras-binding domain (RBD). The physical association of Ras and SIN1/mTORC2 could potentially affect both mTORC2 and Ras-ERK pathways. To decipher the precise molecular mechanism of this interaction, we determined the high-resolution structures of HRas/KRas-SIN1 RBD complexes, showing the detailed interaction interface. Mutation of critical interface residues abolished Ras-SIN1 interaction and in SIN1 knockout cells we demonstrated that Ras-SIN1 association promotes SGK1 activity but inhibits insulin-induced ERK activation. With structural comparison and competition fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) assays we showed that HRas-SIN1 RBD association is much weaker than HRas-Raf1 RBD but is slightly stronger than HRas-PI3K RBD interaction, providing a possible explanation for the different outcome of insulin or EGF stimulation. We also found that SIN1 isoform lacking the PH domain binds stronger to Ras than other longer isoforms and the PH domain appears to have an inhibitory effect on Ras-SIN1 binding. In addition, we uncovered a Ras dimerization interface that could be critical for Ras oligomerization. Our results advance our understanding of Ras-SIN1 association and crosstalk between growth factor-stimulated pathways.

Not all RAS mutations are equal: A detailed review of the functional diversity of RAS hot spot mutations.

The RAS family of small GTPases are among the most frequently mutated oncogenes in human cancer. Approximately 20% of cancers harbor a RAS mutation, and >150 different missense mutations have been detected. Many of these mutations have mutant-specific biochemical defects that alter nucleotide binding and hydrolysis, effector interactions and cell signaling, prompting renewed efforts in the development of anti-RAS therapies, including the mutation-specific strategies. Previously viewed as undruggable, the recent FDA approval of a KRASG12C-selective inhibitor has offered real promise to the development of allele-specific RAS therapies. A broader understanding of the mutational consequences on RAS function must be developed to exploit additional allele-specific vulnerabilities. Approximately 94% of RAS mutations occur at one of three mutational "hot spots" at Gly12, Gly13 and Gln61. Further, the single-nucleotide substitutions represent >99% of these mutations. Within this scope, we discuss the mutational frequencies of RAS isoforms in cancer, mutant-specific effector interactions and biochemical properties. By limiting our analysis to this mutational subset, we simplify the analysis while only excluding a small percentage of total mutations. Combined, these data suggest that the presence or absence of select RAS mutations in human cancers can be linked to their biochemical properties. Continuing to examine the biochemical differences in each RAS-mutant protein will continue to provide additional breakthroughs in allele-specific therapeutic strategies.

Ras Family of Small GTPases in CRC: New Perspectives for Overcoming Drug Resistance.

Simple SummaryRas-GTPases play a key role in the control of fundamental cellular processes such as proliferation, survival, adhesion, and differentiation. These functions make them particularly relevant in the development and progression of numerous types of cancer. Activating mutations in some of these proteins are particularly relevant in colorectal cancer and largely determine its response to available therapies. In this review, we will discuss the role of Ras-GTPases in colorectal cancer, the strategies available to inhibit them and their implication in overcoming resistance to the therapies currently used in clinical practice.Colorectal cancer remains among the cancers with the highest incidence, prevalence, and mortality worldwide. Although the development of targeted therapies against the EGFR and VEGFR membrane receptors has considerably improved survival in these patients, the appearance of resistance means that their success is still limited. Overactivation of several members of the Ras-GTPase family is one of the main actors in both tumour progression and the lack of response to cytotoxic and targeted therapies. This fact has led many resources to be devoted over the last decades to the development of targeted therapies against these proteins. However, they have not been as successful as expected in their move to the clinic so far. In this review, we will analyse the role of these Ras-GTPases in the emergence and development of colorectal cancer and their relationship with resistance to targeted therapies, as well as the status and new advances in the design of targeted therapies against these proteins and their possible clinical implications.

RLIP76: A Structural and Functional Triumvirate.

Simple SummaryThe RLIP76 protein is present at high levels in multiple cancers, compared with levels in normal cells. In cancer cells it is thought to be important for removal of chemotherapeutics, while in normal cells it has been implicated in endocytosis, stress response and mitochondrial fission. Although RLIP76 is a potential target for ovary, breast, lung, colon, prostate and kidney cancers, only the middle third of the protein has been structurally characterized. Understanding the full structure of RLIP76 will help us to better understand the signalling pathways in which it is involved and by extension its role in cancer.RLIP76/RalBP1 is an ATP-dependent transporter of glutathione conjugates, which is overexpressed in various human cancers, but its diverse functions in normal cells, which include endocytosis, stress response and mitochondrial dynamics, are still not fully understood. The protein can be divided into three distinct regions, each with its own structural properties. At the centre of the protein are two well-defined domains, a GTPase activating protein domain targeting Rho family small G proteins and a small coiled-coil that binds to the Ras family small GTPases RalA and RalB. In engaging with Rho and Ral proteins, RLIP76 bridges these two distinct G protein families. The N-terminal region is predicted to be disordered and is rich in basic amino acids, which may mediate membrane association, consistent with its role in transport. RLIP76 is an ATP-dependent transporter with ATP-binding sites within the N-terminus and the Ral binding domain. Furthermore, RLIP76 is subject to extensive phosphorylation, particularly in the N-terminal region. In contrast, the C-terminal region is thought to form an extensive coiled-coil that could mediate dimerization. Here, we review the structural features of RLIP76, including experimental data and computational predictions, and discuss the implications of its various post-translational modifications.

40 Years of RAS-A Historic Overview.

It has been over forty years since the isolation of the first human oncogene (HRAS), a crucial milestone in cancer research made possible through the combined efforts of a few selected research groups at the beginning of the 1980s. Those initial discoveries led to a quantitative leap in our understanding of cancer biology and set up the onset of the field of molecular oncology. The following four decades of RAS research have produced a huge pool of new knowledge about the RAS family of small GTPases, including how they regulate signaling pathways controlling many cellular physiological processes, or how oncogenic mutations trigger pathological conditions, including developmental syndromes or many cancer types. However, despite the extensive body of available basic knowledge, specific effective treatments for RAS-driven cancers are still lacking. Hopefully, recent advances involving the discovery of novel pockets on the RAS surface as well as highly specific small-molecule inhibitors able to block its interaction with effectors and/or activators may lead to the development of new, effective treatments for cancer. This review intends to provide a quick, summarized historical overview of the main milestones in RAS research spanning from the initial discovery of the viral RAS oncogenes in rodent tumors to the latest attempts at targeting RAS oncogenes in various human cancers.

Abstract 1095: Comprehensive pan-cancer analyses of RAS genomic diversity

Abstract The RAS family of small GTPases represents the most commonly activated oncogenes and mutations in KRAS, NRAS and HRAS are found in approximately one third of all human cancers. To better understand the prevalence of somatic RAS mutations and the compendium of genes that have RAS-dependent co-mutation frequencies in an unbiased pan-cancer manner, we analyzed targeted next-generation sequence data from the AACR Project GENIE Registry (GENIE version 6.1-public). Our analyses utilized 644,757 mutations from 64,217 tumors in 97 cancer types. A Bayesian hierarchical model was implemented to estimate cancer-specific prevalence of RAS and non-RAS somatic mutations. To evaluate RAS co-mutations, we compared the observed co-mutation frequencies of RAS and non-RAS somatic mutations to posterior predictive distributions of their expected co-mutation frequencies under independence. The prevalence of RAS codon 12, 13 and 61 mutations varied among cancer types, ranging from 77.7% in pancreatic cancer-PAC, 44.8% in colorectal cancer-CRC, 31.2% in non-small cell lung cancer-NSCLC, 1.1% in breast cancer, and 0.5% in mesotheliomas. A cancer type-specific distribution was observed, such that KRAS was frequently mutated in >25% of the tumors, NRAS was frequently mutated in melanoma, hematologic malignancies and thyroid cancer, while HRAS was overall less frequently mutated. KRAS codon 12 mutations predominated in pancreatic cancers (69.8%), GI cancers (30.9-48.5%), NSCLC (26.3%), endometrial cancer (14.7%) and germ cell tumors (11.6%). KRAS G12C mutations were predominantly seen in NSCLC (12.4%, 95% CI: 11.8-13.1%) with lower frequencies in GI cancers (3.2% in CRC). RAS mutations co-occurred with mutations in STK11, ATM, KEAP1, RBM10 and EPHA5 in NSCLC, TERT in melanoma and PIK3CA in CRC. Patterns of mutual exclusivity emerged between RAS mutations and BRAF in melanoma, thyroid and NSCLC, EGFR and RB1 in NSCLC, GNA11 and GNAQ in melanoma, FGFR3 in bladder cancer, MEN1 in PAC, RNF43 in CRC, BAP1 in melanoma and BAP1 and TERT2 in hepatobiliary carcinoma. A cancer type-specific co-occurrence pattern was noted for RAS and TP53 genomic alterations, with a significant enrichment in TP53 mutations in RAS-mutant PAC but a significant under-representation of TP53 mutations in RAS-mutant endometrial cancer, NSCLC, ovarian cancer and CRC. Analysis of codon specific RAS variants revealed additional co-mutation patterns, including an enrichment in NTRK3 mutations in KRAS G12C-mutant NSCLC and mutual exclusivity between KRAS G12C mutations and EGFR and BRAF in NSCLC. The tissue-distinct differential enrichment in RAS mutations and co-mutation patterns may be reflective of selection of oncogenic RAS signaling under the tumor type-specific modifying effect of other driver mutations. The RAS genetic architecture points to tissue-specific therapeutic vulnerabilities that may be translated to targeted treatment strategies. Citation Format: Robert Scharpf, Gregory Riely, Mark Awad, Michele Lenoue-Newton, Biagio Ricciuti, Julia Rudolph, Leon Raskin, Andrew Park, Jocelyn Lee, Christine Lovly, Valsamo Anagnostou. Comprehensive pan-cancer analyses of RAS genomic diversity [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 1095.

Coordinated Ras and Rac Activity Shapes Macropinocytic Cups and Enables Phagocytosis of Geometrically Diverse Bacteria

SummaryEngulfment of extracellular material by phagocytosis or macropinocytosis depends on the ability of cells to generate specialized cup-shaped protrusions. To effectively capture and internalize their targets, these cups are organized into a ring or ruffle of actin-driven protrusion encircling a non-protrusive interior domain. These functional domains depend on the combined activities of multiple Ras and Rho family small GTPases, but how their activities are integrated and differentially regulated over space and time is unknown. Here, we show that the amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum coordinates Ras and Rac activity using the multidomain protein RGBARG (RCC1, RhoGEF, BAR, and RasGAP-containing protein). We find RGBARG uses a tripartite mechanism of Ras, Rac, and phospholipid interactions to localize at the protruding edge and interface with the interior of both macropinocytic and phagocytic cups. There, we propose RGBARG shapes the protrusion by expanding Rac activation at the rim while suppressing expansion of the active Ras interior domain. Consequently, cells lacking RGBARG form enlarged, flat interior domains unable to generate large macropinosomes. During phagocytosis, we find that disruption of RGBARG causes a geometry-specific defect in engulfing rod-shaped bacteria and ellipsoidal beads. This demonstrates the importance of coordinating small GTPase activities during engulfment of more complex shapes and thus the full physiological range of microbes, and how this is achieved in a model professional phagocyte.

Analysis of RAS protein interactions in living cells reveals a mechanism for pan-RAS depletion by membrane-targeted RAS binders

HRAS, NRAS, and KRAS4A/KRAS4B comprise the RAS family of small GTPases that regulate signaling pathways controlling cell proliferation, differentiation, and survival. RAS pathway abnormalities cause developmental disorders and cancers. We found that KRAS4B colocalizes on the cell membrane with other RAS isoforms and a subset of prenylated small GTPase family members using a live-cell quantitative split luciferase complementation assay. RAS protein coclustering is mainly mediated by membrane association-facilitated interactions (MAFIs). Using the RAS-RBD (CRAF RAS binding domain) interaction as a model system, we showed that MAFI alone is not sufficient to induce RBD-mediated RAS inhibition. Surprisingly, we discovered that high-affinity membrane-targeted RAS binding proteins inhibit RAS activity and deplete RAS proteins through an autophagosome-lysosome-mediated degradation pathway. Our results provide a mechanism for regulating RAS activity and protein levels, a more detailed understanding of which should lead to therapeutic strategies for inhibiting and depleting oncogenic RAS proteins.