An attempt has been made to correlate clinical, histologic, and roentgenographic observations of endodontically treated teeth in order to focus attention on the inadequacies of the roentgenogram as the sole criterion of treatment success. Definitions and interpretations of success vary among clinicians, and most often the roentgenogram is used as the sole criterion of success. Clinical observations, such as the persistence of pain, swelling, and the development of a fistula, are seldom included as additional criteria. Roentgenographic interpretations of radiolucencies present many fallibilities. These are usually produced by differences in vertical and horizontal angulation of the roentgen beam. Systemic and local constitutional disorders often simulate periapical radiolucencies that are not of endodontic origin. Periodontal disease often causes roentgenographic lesions that are mistaken for evidence of endodontic treatment failure. These lesions develop either before or after endodontic treatment. Differences in the length of observation time used for the evaluation of success can produce variations in the rates of success or failure. Using the roentgenogram as the only criterion of success in cases in which no radiolucency developed in teeth without a region of rarefaction, we observed a success rate of 92.7 per cent in 1,200 cases within a period of 6 months. After a period of 2 years the success rate was 88.7 per cent in 500 cases. This difference was statistically significant. In cases of teeth with radiolucencies in which a decrease in the size of the area was viewed as an indication of success, there was no difference between a 6 month (75 per cent) and a 2 year (77 per cent) follow-up. When complete bone regeneration, as visualized on the roentgenogram, was used as the standard of success, our success rate was 39.2 per cent in 365 teeth after an observation period of 2 to 10 years. Failures as manifested by roentgenographic evidence usually will occur within 2 years, whereas the clinical symptoms of pain, swelling, and development of a fistula will occur during treatment or within the first few months after treatment. The teeth of patients with persistent pain during or immediately after treatment are often resected or extracted. This group is seldom included in the analysis of endodontic failures. Histologic sections of teeth, with and without areas of rarefaction, that were extracted because of pain occasionally revealed the presence of undisclosed accessory or lateral canals. However, pain was also present in a similar number of cases in which there were no accessory canals. Furthermore, necrotic tissue was observed in many of these canals with no clinical symptoms of pain. In endodontically treated teeth with periapical radiolucencies, there is a definite correlation with histologic findings, whereas no such correlation exists in teeth without periapical radiolucencies. This lack of correlation is especially true in the case of teeth with necrotic pulps. Histologic evidence of chronic inflammation in the periapical tissues of teeth with normal roentgenographic findings has been observed invariably in both animal and human teeth with necrotic pulps. Cysts and granulomas developed in the periapical region following pulp extirpation in a number of cases that did not exhibit radiolucent areas before or after treatment. Most of the histologic sections of periapical tissues of teeth with areas of rarefaction revealed granulomas and cysts in equal distribution. Scar tissue in the periapical region was found in only two of 100 specimens examined after treatment. The small incidence of cases with scar tissue in the periapical area does not justify the conclusion that healing occurs with scar tissue formation merely because an area appears smaller on a follow-up roentgenogram. We have observed that large areas of radiolucency can also contain fibrous tissue following endodontic therapy in a similar percentage of cases. Large, small, arrested, or reduced areas of rarefaction all contain the same inflammatory cells. Most radiolucencies, whatever their size may be, are either granulomas or cysts. We have proposed a hypothesis to show how a cystic lesion can heal following a nonsurgical or conservative endodontic procedure, and we have offered new and more realistic criteria of successful endodontic therapy, based on clinical, histologic, and roentgenographic evaluation.
Read full abstract