Drugs For Rare Diseases Research Articles

Expediting treatments in the 21st century: orphan drugs and accelerated approvals

BackgroundIn response to activated patient communities’ catalyzation, two significant efforts by the FDA to expedite treatments have now been in place for multiple decades. In 1983, the United States Congress passed the Orphan Drug Act to provide financial incentives for development of drugs for rare diseases. In 1992, partly in response to the HIV epidemic, the FDA implemented Accelerated Approval (AA) to expedite access to promising new therapies to treat serious conditions with unmet medical need based on surrogate marker efficacy while additional clinical data is confirmed.The uses of these regulatory approaches over time are assessed in this study.MethodsThe following U.S. FDA CDER published lists were used in this analysis: 1. all orphan designations and approvals; 2. all AA and their details updated through December 31, 2022; new molecular entities (NMEs).ResultsOrphan drug designations and approvals have increased several-fold over the past four decades. The largest increase recently has been in therapies targeting oncological diseases (comprised of both oncology and malignant hematology).Although orphan drug approvals based on NMEs are the minority of orphan drug designations, the count of approved orphan drug NMEs has increased in recent years.The characteristics of orphan drug approvals show notable differences by disease area with rare diseases and medical genetics (49%) having a relatively large fraction of orphan drug approvals with NMEs compared to the oncological diseases (32%).Similar to the use of orphan drug designation, oncological disease therapies have been the largest utilizers of AA. Many therapies targeting these diseases address unmet medical need and can leverage surrogate markers that have previously been used in similar trials.The timings of conversion of AA (confirmed or withdrawn) were assessed and found to be consistent across decades and to have some dependency upon the broad disease area (when assessed by three large groups: HIV conversions were fastest; followed by oncology; followed by all others). By the end of 2022, 98% of the first 105 (approved in 2010 or earlier) AA had been converted to confirmed or withdrawn.ConclusionsAlthough the typical timings for AA to be confirmed or withdrawn has not changed significantly over the decades, the disease areas utilizing orphan drug designation and AA have changed significantly over time. Both programs have had increases in their use for therapies targeting oncological diseases.The re-use of surrogate markers for oncological diseases has been an advantage in a way that may not be scientifically feasible in many other disease areas that have greater differentiation across disease etiology. For non-oncological diseases, applicability of AA is, in part, dependent upon greater focus on characterization and acceptance of novel surrogate markers.

Quantitative Systems Pharmacology Models: Potential Tools for Advancing Drug Development for Rare Diseases.

Rare diseases, affecting millions globally, present significant drug development challenges. This is due to the limited patient populations and the unique pathophysiology of these diseases, which can make traditional clinical trial designs unfeasible. Quantitative Systems Pharmacology (QSP) models offer a promising approach to expedite drug development, particularly in rare diseases. QSP models provide a mechanistic representation of the disease and drug response in virtual patients that can complement routinely applied empirical modeling and simulation approaches. QSP models can generate digital twins of actual patients and mechanistically simulate the disease progression of rare diseases, accounting for phenotypic heterogeneity. QSP models can also support drug development in various drug modalities, such as gene therapy. Impactful QSP models case studies are presented here to illustrate their value in supporting various aspects of drug development in rare indications. As these QSP model applications continue to mature, there is a growing possibility that they could be more widely integrated into routine drug development steps. This integration could provide a robust framework for addressing some of the inherent challenges in rare disease drug development.

Building a National Policy for Rare Disease in Brazil.

Rare diseases (RD) are individually rare, although encompass a significant proportion of the population, affecting not only the individuals but also their families. In Brazil RD is defined by the Ministry of Health as a disorder that affects up to 65 individuals in 100,000, or 1.3 individuals in every 2,000. In this review the environment that led to the publication of a National Policy for Comprehensive Care for People of Rare Disease in 2014, a national plan with the aim to decrease morbidity and mortality of RD, improving the care of people with RD in the public health system are described. The process that finally led to such policy took over a decade, moving forward not only due to technical needs, but having patient organizations as essential actors and advocates. Specialized centers in RD were licensed and, since its publication, 33 centers have been accredited; such process, however, has been slow and concentrated in specific regions and larger cities of the country. Despite the incorporation of genetic tests in 2014 and exome sequencing later in 2020, many genetic tests are not offered by specialized centers, with unequal availability across the country. Public health system in Brazil uses ICD-10 for disease coding, preventing appropriate epidemiologic knowledge of RD in Brazil. Incorporation of new technologies as orphan drugs has been in place and regulation for expedite licensing for new RD drugs were issued, although high cost and availability to RD population has been a challenge.

Roadmap for Linking Registry Data with Health Services Data to Support Evidence-Informed Decision-Making.

ApproachAs part of a learning period to optimize the use of RWE for decision-making for drugs for rare diseases, the [organization name removed to allow for blind review] conducted an environmental scan to map real-world data in patient registries. Over 400 patient registries were identified, signaling the potential wealth of untapped information to support decision-making by linking registry data with health services data. To better understand the challenges faced by registry holders hoping to link registry data with health services data sources available in Canada, a series of interviews were conducted with several Canadian rare disease registries. In addition, a literature review was completed, and Canadian experts in epidemiology, privacy, record linkage, registry science, and health services research were consulted to inform the development of a roadmap to meet various stakeholder needs. ResultsThe resulting roadmap consists of 8 specific steps covering topics related to registry purpose, informed consent, ethical approval, participant privacy, governance, data linkability, participant identifiability and jurisdictional requirements. ConclusionThe roadmap is currently undergoing pilot testing by a pan-Canadian rare disease registry. A final [organization name] report and an accompanying roadmap in a checklist format to facilitate implementation will be finalized, disseminated across key stakeholders, and made publicly available. ImplicationsWhile developed for registries, the roadmap applies to the linkage of clinical trial or cohort study data, or other systematically gathered patient-level data to health services data.

Reversal Gene Expression Assessment for Drug Repurposing, a Case Study of Glioblastoma.

Glioblastoma (GBM) is a rare brain cancer with an exceptionally high mortality rate, which illustrates the pressing demand for more effective therapeutic options. Despite considerable research efforts on GBM, its underlying biological mechanisms remain unclear. Furthermore, none of the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved drugs used for GBM deliver satisfactory survival improvement. This study presents a novel computational pipeline by utilizing gene expression data analysis for GBM for drug repurposing to address the challenges in rare disease drug development, particularly focusing on GBM. The GBM Gene Expression Profile (GGEP) was constructed with multi-omics data to identify drugs with reversal gene expression to GGEP from the Integrated Network-Based Cellular Signatures (iLINCS) database. We prioritized the candidates via hierarchical clustering of their expression signatures and quantification of their reversal strength by calculating two self-defined indices based on the GGEP genes' log2 foldchange (LFCs) that the drug candidates could induce. Among eight prioritized candidates, in-vitro experiments validated Clofarabine and Ciclopirox as highly efficacious in selectively targeting GBM cancer cells. The success of this study illustrated a promising avenue for accelerating drug development by uncovering underlying gene expression effect between drugs and diseases, which can be extended to other rare diseases and non-rare diseases.

Commentary: Which Principles Should Apply for a National Strategy on Rare Diseases?

Lexchin and Sirrs (2024) proposed five relevant principles to guide the use of federal funding for expensive drugs for rare diseases, including funding of outcomes-based risk-sharing agreements (OBRSAs) and proactive commitment and participation in the generation of high-quality evidence in a transparent way. This rejoinder, however, questions whether the federal funding should be used only to buy new drugs or whether it could be used to develop new drugs as well. It also examines what OBRSAs would require in terms of institutional capacities to allow the collection of real-world evidence.

Pediatric Rare Diseases Development in the Pharmaceutical Industry: An International Consortium for Innovation and Quality in Pharmaceutical Development, Clinical Pharmacology Leadership Group-Pediatrics Working Group, Rare Diseases Subteam Whitepaper Examining the Current Landscape and Recommendations for the Future.

Many new opportunities surround rare pediatric disease drug development, thanks to key advances in regulatory thinking and in the scientific community. As rare disease drug development brings challenges to the developers in terms of limited understanding of natural history, heterogeneity in drug response, as well as difficulty recruiting patients in pivotal trials, there has never been a greater need for quantitative integration. To understand how International Consortium for Innovation and Quality in Pharmaceutical Development (IQ) member companies approach pediatric rare disease drug development, the rare pediatric subteam of the Clinical Pharmacology Leadership Group (CPLG) sponsored Pediatrics Working Group conducted a baseline survey to assess the four main pillars of this quantitative innovation, namely, biomarkers and surrogate end points, statistical methodologies, model-informed drug development, as well as public-private partnerships. The survey was administered by IQ and yielded 13 evaluable responders from represented companies. This article presents the key findings from this baseline identifying survey, highlighting the key blind spots, and providing insightful expert opinions to address those gaps. In summary, we call an urgent attention to the community on the opportunities to enhance integration and within-industry learnings from this analysis on aspects related to platform studies, end-to-end quantitative integration, and sharing of trial-level placebo data for better understanding of disease progression and more efficient trial designs. We collectively hope that these findings will stimulate discussion and debate around cross-industry sharing and collaboration to better delineate principles and further enhance the efficiency of rare pediatric disease drug development.

Unlocking the full potential of rare disease drug development: exploring the not-for-profit sector's contributions to drug development and access.

This commentary provides a comprehensive overview of the challenges and opportunities in the field of drug development for rare diseases and especially of gene therapy products for ultra-rare diseases. It discusses the limited market size, reimbursement and scientific complexities that deter pharmaceutical investment in this field. Highlighting the pivotal role of charitable organizations like Fondazione Telethon, it showcases their efforts in funding research and ensuring access to innovative therapies. This commentary also addresses the challenges in therapy distribution, particularly regarding sustainability and global access. It outlines Fondazione Telethon's operational model to try to address these challenges. Finally, it appeals to governments and regulatory bodies to implement policies and incentives aimed at further fostering innovation and accessibility in rare disease drug development and access.

Federal Funding for Expensive Drugs for Rare Diseases: How Do We Pick and Choose?

The number of expensive drugs for rare diseases (EDRDs) approved by Health Canada and their contribution to healthcare costs have been rapidly increasing. The federal government has announced a three-year funding commitment of $1.4 billion for EDRDs, but principles need to be developed for how that funding will be allocated, especially in cases where insufficient data are available to guide decision making. Here, we review the role of evidence quality in making choices and draw on the experience from other countries to put forward five principles about how the money should be spent.

Utilization and affordability of health insurance coverage for rare disease drugs in a first-tier city in Northeast China from 2018 to 2021: a study based on the health insurance claims database

ObjectiveThe accessibility issue of orphan drugs in China is prominent. Based on real-world data from a tier-one city in Northeast China, this study aims to analyze the current usage and affordability of orphan drugs for rare diseases.MethodsThe data was sourced from the health insurance claims data of a certain city from 2018 to 2021, including a total of 16 orphan drugs. The utilization of orphan drugs is assessed using four indicators: frequency of medical insurance claims, medication cost, defined daily doses (DDDs), and defined daily drug cost (DDDc). Affordability is measured using the concept of catastrophic health expenditure (CHE).ResultsBetween January 2018 and December 2021, there were a total of 2,851 medical insurance claims in the city, with a total medication costs of $3.08 million. Overall, during the study, there was a year-on-year increase in the utilization frequency of individual rare disease drugs in the city, with DDDs rising from 140.22 in 2018 to 3983.63 in 2021. Additionally, the annual medication costs of individual drugs showed a consistent upward trend, increasing from $10,953.53 in 2018 to $120,491.36 in 2021. However, the DDDc of individual drugs decreased from $398.12 in 2018 to $96.65 in 2021.The number of sales and the amount of sales for orphan drugs in community pharmacies have significantly increased. Prior to medical insurance coverage, out of the 16 orphan drugs, 9 drugs had annual treatment costs exceeding CHE for urban residents, and 15 drugs had annual treatment costs exceeding CHE for rural residents. After medical insurance coverage, there were no drugs with out-of-pocket costs exceeding CHE for urban residents, while 8 drugs had out-of-pocket costs exceeding CHE for rural residents. Furthermore, both before and after medical insurance coverage, the four treatment drugs for idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension were more affordable compared to the four treatment drugs for multiple sclerosis.ConclusionThe usage frequency of orphan drugs in a certain city increased gradually, but the disease burden remained heavy. More policy support should be provided to the priority rare disease populations, and the rare disease medical security and diagnosis and treatment systems should be improved.

Development of orphan drugs for rare diseases.

Most rare diseases (orphan diseases) still lack approved treatment options despite major advances in research providing the necessary tools to understand their molecular basis and legislation providing regulatory and economic incentives to expedite the development of specific therapies. Addressing this translational gap is a multifaceted challenge, a key aspect of which is the selection of an optimal therapeutic modality to translate advances in rare disease knowledge to potential medicines known as orphan drugs. There are several strategies for developing orphan drugs for rare genetic disorders, including protein replacement therapies, small-molecule therapies (e.g., substrate reduction, chemical chaperone, cofactor, expression modification, and read-through therapies), monoclonal antibodies, antisense oligonucleotides, small interfering RNA or exon skipping therapies, gene replacement and direct genome-editing therapies, mRNA therapy, cell therapy, and drug repurposing. Each strategy has its own strengths and limitations in orphan drug development. Furthermore, numerous hurdles are present in clinical trials of rare genetic diseases because of difficulty with patient recruitment, unknown molecular physiology, the natural history of the disease, ethical concerns regarding pediatric patients, and regulatory challenges. To address these barriers, the rare genetic diseases community, including academic institutions, industry, patient advocacy groups, foundations, payers, and government regulatory and research organizations, must become engaged in discussions about these issues.

New Horizons of Model Informed Drug Development in Rare Diseases Drug Development.

Model-informed approaches provide a quantitative framework to integrate all available nonclinical and clinical data, thus furnishing a totality of evidence approach to drug development and regulatory evaluation. Maximizing the use of all available data and information about the drug enables a more robust characterization of the risk-benefit profile and reduces uncertainty in both technical and regulatory success. This offers the potential to transform rare diseases drug development, where conducting large well-controlled clinical trials is impractical and/or unethical due to a small patient population, a significant portion of which could be children. Additionally, the totality of evidence generated by model-informed approaches can provide confirmatory evidence for regulatory approval without the need for additional clinical data. In the article, applications of novel quantitative approaches such as quantitative systems pharmacology, disease progression modeling, artificial intelligence, machine learning, modeling of real-world data using model-based meta-analysis and strategies such as external control and patient-reported outcomes as well as clinical trial simulations to optimize trials and sample collection are discussed. Specific case studies of these modeling approaches in rare diseases are provided to showcase applications in drug development and regulatory review. Finally, perspectives are shared on the future state of these modeling approaches in rare diseases drug development along with challenges and opportunities for incorporating such tools in the rational development of drug products.

International Drug Repurposing Patent Landscaping, Part 1: Rare Diseases 2010–2023

In this first installment of a series of papers on landscaping of drug repurposing patents, we present an analysis in the context of rare diseases. Using the RepoScope drug repurposing database, developed as part of the REPO4EU Horizon Europe project, we identified 190 documents that were published through the international PCT (Patent Cooperation Treaty) patent system from 2010 to 2023. These documents claimed utility in a total of 98 rare diseases. We provide detailed tabulated summaries for two representative disease classes: lysosomal storage diseases and muscular dystrophies. High variability in active pharmaceutical ingredients indicated high levels of innovation. Seventy-five percent of rare disease drug repurposing patents were filed by small/medium pharmaceutical companies or universities, often university spin-offs. Big pharmaceutical companies show limited interest in this area, as reflected by their low representation. Approximately one-third of all patent disclosures came from the United States and the European Union (EU). The EU demonstrated a stronger position in patenting for rare diseases than general pharmaceutical patenting. Patentees from China, Korea, and Japan, who are notable in the general pharmaceutical field, showed limited interest in rare disease drug repurposing patents, in contrast to their publication record in this area.

Evidence Quality and Health Technology Assessment Outcomes in Reappraisals of Drugs for Rare Diseases in Germany

ObjectivesEvidence on reappraisals of health technologies in Germany is limited, and for rare disease treatments (RDTs), the Federal Joint Committee follows different processes (limited or regular), depending on whether an annual revenue threshold has been exceeded. Our objective is to better understand (re)appraisal processes and their outcomes for RDTs in Germany. MethodsWe analyzed appraisal documents of 55 RDT indications for which an initial appraisal and a reappraisal were conducted between 2011 and 2023. We extracted information for the type of evidence, the risk of bias, the availability of additional evidence, and the change in the maturity of survival data as proxies for evidence quality. Specifically, we reviewed the reasons for conducting reappraisals, examined how evidence quality and the clinical benefit rating (CBR) differed between initial appraisals and reappraisals, and explored the association between evidence quality and (1) the CBR and (2) the change in the CBR after reappraisal. ResultsMost reappraisals were conducted because the annual revenue threshold was exceeded or the initial appraisal resolution was time limited. Almost all initial appraisals used the limited process, whereas the majority of reappraisals used the regular process. The CBR increased in only 9 and decreased in 21 of 55 reappraisals. There was some evidence that reappraisals with an accepted randomized controlled trial were significantly more likely to achieve a higher CBR. ConclusionsFindings confirmed that reasons and processes for conducting reappraisals of RDTs in Germany differ. Further, high CBRs in reappraisals were not common and evidence quality in initial appraisals and reappraisals was limited.

Realistic Problems and Development Suggestions of China's Medication Assurance System for Rare Diseases

This study analyses the current situation and existing problems of China's rare disease medication Assurance practice in terms of policy system, main body's actions and protection effectiveness: from the perspective of policy design and the three main bodies' practical actions, the current situation of China's rare disease medication assurance is sorted out; based on this, the real problems of the current protection system in terms of the formulation of front-end policies and the actual benefits for end patients are clarified. Based on this, we will optimise the level of drug protection for rare diseases in China, and put forward specific recommendations: systematic construction of the top-level design for rare diseases, value assessment and payment agreement for innovative drugs in medical insurance, innovation and development of the medical emphasis system and talent cultivation, and improvement of the incentive system for market exclusivity and research and development of drugs for rare diseases.

HPR22 Does Expedited Regulatory Approval Status Increase Rare Disease Drug Non-Coverage?

HPR22 Does Expedited Regulatory Approval Status Increase Rare Disease Drug Non-Coverage?

Paediatric Drug Development in China: Current Status and Future Prospects.

For more than two decades, regulatory agencies throughout the world released guidelines, rules and laws to stimulate and assist in paediatric drug development. In 2014, the National Health and Family Planning Commission (now known as the National Health Commission, NHC) and five other departments in China jointly issued 'Several Opinions on Safeguarding Medication for Children', after which several policies and regulations were issued to implement the priority review and approval of paediatric medicinal products and support the development of new drugs, including new dosage forms and strengths, for children. A total of 172 special medicinal products for children were approved from 2018 to 2022. Since 2016, the NHC, together with relevant administrative departments, has formulated and issued four paediatric drug lists containing 129 medicinal products to encourage research and development. At present, approximately 25 of these drugs (at exactly the same dosage forms and strengths as on the lists) have been approved for marketing, including antitumour drugs and immunomodulators, nervous system drugs, drugs for mental disorders and drugs for rare diseases. In this review, we analysed the regulations issued for promoting paediatric drug development in China, including the priority review and approval system, technical guidelines, data protection and financial support policies and general profiles of paediatric drug approval, clinical trials and the addition of information for children in the labels of marketed medicinal products. Finally, we discussed the challenges and possible strategies in the research and development of paediatric drugs in China.

Challenges and Proposed Reforms for NHI Coverage of Rare Diseases and Orphan Drugs in Taiwan

Challenges and Proposed Reforms for NHI Coverage of Rare Diseases and Orphan Drugs in Taiwan

Issues, Challenges and Opportunities for Economic Evaluations of Orphan Drugs in Rare Diseases: An Umbrella Review.

There are significant challenges when obtaining clinical and economic evidence for health technology assessments of rare diseases. Many of them have been highlighted in previous systematic reviews but they have not been summarised in a comprehensive manner. For all stakeholders working with rare diseases, it is important to be aware and understand these issues. The objective of this review is to identify the main challenges for the economic evaluation of orphan drugs in rare diseases. An umbrella review of systematic reviews of economic studies concerned with orphan and ultra-orphan drugs was conducted. Studies that were not systematic reviews, or on advanced therapeutic medicinal products, personalised medicines or other interventions that were not considered orphan drugs were excluded. The database searches included publications from 2010 to 2023, and were conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane library using filters for systematic reviews, and economic evaluations and models. These filters were combined with search terms for rare diseases and orphan drugs. A hand search supplemented the literature searches. The findings were reported by a compliant Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) flow diagram. Two hundred and eighty-two records were identified from the literature searches, of which 64 were duplicates, whereas five reviews were identified from the hand search. A total of 36 reviews were included after screening against inclusion/exclusion criteria, 35 from literature searches and one from hand searching. Of those studies 1, 27 and 8 were low, moderate and high quality, respectively. The reviews highlight the scarcity of evidence for health economic parameters, for example, clinical effectiveness, costs, quality of life and the natural history of disease. Health economic evaluations such as cost-effectiveness and budget-impact analyses were scarce, and generally low-to-moderate quality. The causes were limited health economic parameters, together with publications bias, especially for cost-effectiveness analyses. The results highlighted issues around a considerable paucity of evidence for economic evaluations and few cost-effectiveness analyses, supporting the notion that a paucity of evidence makes economic evaluations of rare diseases more challenging compared with more prevalent diseases. Furthermore, we provide recommendations for more sustainable approaches in economic evaluations of rare diseases.

Detection of vesivirus in minks (Neovison vison), Italy 2021.

Vesiviruses are important animal pathogens with a broad host range, and they have also been involved in accidental contamination of cells used for the production of drugs for rare and life-threatening human diseases. A vesivirus (family Caliciviridae) was detected in minks (Neovison vison) with respiratory and neurological signs, during syndromic surveillance for SARS-CoV-2 conducted in Italy. The complete genome (8,397 nucleotides in length) of the vesivirus strain ITA/2021/mink/TE (OR130287) was obtained by combining NGS approach with 5' and 3' RACE protocols. The virus was seemingly more related (95.9-97.2% nt identity in the partial RNA-dependent RNA polymerase) to American vesivirus isolates 9/1980/US, 12/1980/US, and 20/1980/US dating back to the early 1980s than to recent mink strains. These results highlight the importance of gathering information on the virome of animals.