Rapid Arterial Occlusion Evaluation Scale Research Articles

Design and Interrater Reliability of the Pediatric Version of the Race Scale: PedRACE.

Acute ischemic stroke is a leading cause of pediatric death and disability. A clinical scale adapted for children can ensure early detection of candidates for urgent acute ischemic stroke treatment. The Rapid Arterial Occlusion Evaluation (RACE) scale for adults, which scores 5 items (facial palsy 0-2; arm motor function 0-2; leg motor function 0-2; head/gaze deviation 0-1; and aphasia or agnosia 0-2), has good sensitivity and specificity in detecting large vessel occlusion. We adapted the previously validated RACE scale for use in children as the Pediatric RACE scale. This adapted scale was tested by prehospital/emergency room staff attending to patients covered by the Catalan Pediatric Stroke Code and child neurologists for its correlation with the Pediatric National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale and for interrater reliability. The study included 50 children, 18 with confirmed strokes (7 acute ischemic strokes and 11 hemorrhagic strokes). Prehospital/emergency staff and child neurologists agreed fully regarding 82% of patients and 100% regarding head/gaze deviation and agnosia. The Pediatric RACE scale correlated strongly with the Pediatric National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale in evaluations by child neurologists (Spearman ρ, 0.852; P<0.001) and prehospital/emergency staff (Spearman ρ, 0.781; P<0.001). The median Pediatric RACE score was significantly higher in patients with large vessel occlusion (6.5; interquartile range, 6-7) than with other etiologies. Pediatric RACE, showing good interrater reliability and correlation with the Pediatric National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, is a simple scale to detect candidates for pediatric acute stroke treatment, designed for both prehospital and in-hospital use by non-neurologist medical staff.

Portable cerebral blood flow monitor to detect large vessel occlusion in patients with suspected stroke

BackgroundEarly detection of large vessel occlusion (LVO) facilitates triage to an appropriate stroke center to reduce treatment times and improve outcomes. Prehospital stroke scales are not sufficiently sensitive, so we...

Sex Differences in Prehospital Identification of Large Vessel Occlusion in Patients With Suspected Stroke.

Differences in clinical presentation of acute ischemic stroke between men and women may affect prehospital identification of anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (aLVO). We assessed sex differences in diagnostic performance of 8 prehospital scales to detect aLVO. We analyzed pooled individual patient data from 2 prospective cohort studies (LPSS [Leiden Prehospital Stroke Study] and PRESTO [Prehospital Triage of Patients With Suspected Stroke Study]) conducted in the Netherlands between 2018 and 2019, including consecutive patients ≥18 years suspected of acute stroke who presented within 6 hours after symptom onset. Ambulance paramedics assessed clinical items from 8 prehospital aLVO detection scales: Los Angeles Motor Scale, Rapid Arterial Occlusion Evaluation, Cincinnati Stroke Triage Assessment Tool, Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale, Prehospital Acute Stroke Severity, gaze-face-arm-speech-time, Conveniently Grasped Field Assessment Stroke Triage, and Face-Arm-Speech-Time Plus Severe Arm or Leg Motor Deficit. We assessed the diagnostic performance of these scales for identifying aLVO at prespecified cut points for men and women. Of 2358 patients with suspected stroke (median age, 73 years; 47% women), 231 (10%) had aLVO (100/1114 [9%] women and 131/1244 [11%] men). The area under the curve of the scales ranged from 0.70 (95% CI, 0.65-0.75) to 0.77 (95% CI, 0.73-0.82) in women versus 0.69 (95% CI, 0.64-0.73) to 0.75 (95% CI, 0.71-0.79) in men. Positive predictive values ranged from 0.23 (95% CI, 0.20-0.27) to 0.29 (95% CI, 0.26-0.31) in women versus 0.29 (95% CI, 0.24-0.33) to 0.37 (95% CI, 0.32-0.43) in men. Negative predictive values were similar (0.95 [95% CI, 0.94-0.96] to 0.98 [95% CI, 0.97-0.98] in women versus 0.94 [95% CI, 0.93-0.95] to 0.96 [95% CI, 0.94-0.97] in men). Sensitivity of the scales was slightly higher in women than in men (0.53 [95% CI, 0.43-0.63] to 0.76 [95% CI, 0.68-0.84] versus 0.49 [95% CI, 0.40-0.57] to 0.63 [95% CI, 0.55-0.73]), whereas specificity was lower (0.79 [95% CI, 0.76-0.81] to 0.87 [95% CI, 0.84-0.89] versus 0.82 [95% CI, 0.79-0.84] to 0.90 [95% CI, 0.88-0.91]). Rapid arterial occlusion evaluation showed the highest positive predictive values in both sexes (0.29 in women and 0.37 in men), reflecting the different event rates. aLVO scales show similar diagnostic performance in both sexes. The rapid arterial occlusion evaluation scale may help optimize prehospital transport decision-making in men as well as in women with suspected stroke.

Real-time video analysis allows the identification of large vessel occlusion in patients with suspected stroke: feasibility trial of a "telestroke" pathway in Northwestern Switzerland.

Loss of time is a major obstacle to efficient stroke treatment. Our telestroke path intends to optimize prehospital triage using a video link connecting ambulance personnel and a stroke physician. The objectives were as follows: (1) To identify patients suffering a stroke and (2) in particular large vessel occlusion (LVO) strokes as candidates for endovascular treatment. We have chosen the Rapid Arterial Occlusion Evaluation (RACE) scale for this purpose. This analysis aimed to verify the feasibility of prehospital stroke identification by video assessment. In this prospective telestroke cohort study, we included 97 subjects, in which the RACE score (items: facial palsy, arm and leg motor function, head and gaze deviation, and aphasia or agnosia) was applied, and the assessment videotaped by a trained member of the Emergency Medical Services (EMS) in the field using a mobile device. Each recorded patient video was independently assessed by three experienced stroke physicians from a certified stroke center and compared to the neuroimaging gold standard. Within this feasibility study, the stroke code was not altered by the outcome of the RACE assessment, and all patients underwent the standard procedures within the emergency unit. We analyzed 97 patients (median age 78 years, 53% women), of whom 51 (52.6%) suffered an acute stroke, 12 (23.5%) of which were due to an LVO and 46 patients had symptoms mimicking a stroke. The sensitivity of stroke identification was 77.8%, and specificity was 53.6%. In regard to the identification of an LVO, sensitivity was 69.4% and specificity was 84.3%. The inter-rater agreement in the RACE-score assessment was ICC = 0.82 (intraclass-correlation coefficient). These results confirm our hypothesis that the local telestroke concept is feasible. It allows correct (i) stroke and (ii) LVO identification in the majority of the cases and thus has the potential to assist in efficient prehospital triage.

Effect of Bypassing the Closest Stroke Center in Patients with Intracerebral Hemorrhage

Prehospital transfer protocols are based on rapid access to reperfusion therapies for patients with ischemic stroke. The effect of different protocols among patients receiving a final diagnosis of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is unknown. To determine the effect of direct transport to an endovascular treatment (EVT)-capable stroke center vs transport to the nearest local stroke center. This was a prespecified secondary analysis of RACECAT, a multicenter, population-based, cluster-randomized clinical trial conducted from March 2017 to June 2020 in Catalonia, Spain. Patients were evaluated by a blinded end point assessment. All consecutive patients suspected of experiencing a large vessel occlusion stroke (Rapid Arterial Occlusion Evaluation Scale [RACE] score in the field >4 on a scale of 0 to 9, with lower to higher stroke severity) with final diagnosis of ICH were included. A total of 1401 patients were enrolled in RACECAT with suspicion of large vessel occlusion stroke. The current analysis was conducted in October 2022. Direct transport to an EVT-capable stroke center (n = 137) or to the closest local stroke center (n = 165). The primary outcome was tested using cumulative ordinal logistic regression to estimate the common odds ratio (OR) and 95% CI of the shift analysis of disability at 90 days as assessed by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score (range, 0 [no symptoms] to 6 [death]) in the intention-to-treat population. Secondary outcomes, included 90-day mortality, death or severe functional dependency, early neurological deterioration, early mortality, ICH volume and enlargement, rate of neurosurgical treatment, rate of clinical complications during initial transport, and rate of adverse events until day 5. Of 1401 patients enrolled, 1099 were excluded from this analysis (32 rejected informed consent, 920 had ischemic stroke, 29 had transient ischemic attack, 12 had subarachnoid hemorrhage, and 106 had stroke mimic). Thus, 302 patients were included (204 [67.5%] men; mean [SD] age 71.7 [12.8] years; and median [IQR] RACE score, 7 [6-8]). For the primary outcome, direct transfer to an EVT-capable stroke center (mean [SD] mRS score, 4.93 [1.38]) resulted in worse functional outcome at 90 days compared with transfer to the nearest local stroke center (mean [SD] mRS score, 4.66 [1.39]; adjusted common OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.41-0.96). Direct transfer to an EVT-capable stroke center also suggested potentially higher 90-day mortality compared with transfer to the nearest local stroke center (67 of 137 [48.9%] vs 62 of 165 [37.6%]; adjusted hazard ratio, 1.40; 95% CI, 0.99-1.99). The rates of medical complications during the initial transfer (30 of 137 [22.6%] vs 9 of 165 patients [5.6%]; adjusted OR, 5.29; 95% CI, 2.38-11.73) and in-hospital pneumonia (49 of 137 patients [35.8%] vs 29 of 165 patients [17.6%]; OR, 2.61; 95% CI, 1.53-4.44) were higher in the EVT-capable stroke center group. In this secondary analysis of the RACECAT randomized clinical trial, bypassing the closest stroke center resulted in reduced chances of functional independence at 90 days for patients who received a final diagnosis of ICH. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02795962.

Prehospital Stroke Triage: A Modeling Study on the Impact of Triage Tools in Different Regions

Background and purpose Direct transportation to a thrombectomy-capable intervention center is beneficial for patients with ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion (LVO), but can delay intravenous thrombolytics (IVT). The aim of this modeling study was to estimate the effect of prehospital triage strategies on treatment delays and overtriage in different regions. Methods We used data from two prospective cohort studies in the Netherlands: the Leiden Prehospital Stroke Study and the PRESTO study. We included stroke code patients within 6 h from symptom onset. We modeled outcomes of Rapid Arterial oCclusion Evaluation (RACE) scale triage and triage with a personalized decision tool, using drip-and-ship as reference. Main outcomes were overtriage (stroke code patients incorrectly triaged to an intervention center), reduced delay to endovascular thrombectomy (EVT), and delay to IVT. Results We included 1798 stroke code patients from four ambulance regions. Per region, overtriage ranged from 1-13% (RACE triage) and 3-15% (personalized tool). Reduction of delay to EVT varied by region between 24 ± 5 min (n = 6) to 78 ± 3 (n = 2), while IVT delay increased with 5 (n = 5) to 15 min (n = 21) for non-LVO patients. The personalized tool reduced delay to EVT for more patients (25 ± 4 min [n = 8] to 49 ± 13 [n = 5]), while delaying IVT with 3-14 min (8-24 patients). In region C, most EVT patients were treated faster (reduction of delay to EVT 31 ± 6 min (n = 35), with RACE triage and the personalized tool. Conclusions In this modeling study, we showed that prehospital triage reduced time to EVT without disproportionate IVT delay, compared to a drip-and-ship strategy. The effect of triage strategies and the associated overtriage varied between regions. Implementation of prehospital triage should therefore be considered on a regional level.

The Rapid Arterial oCclusion Evaluation (RACE) scale accuracy for diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke in emergency department – A multicenter study

ObjectiveIt seems that the available data on performance of the Rapid Arterial oCclusion Evaluation (RACE) as a prehospital stroke scale for differentiating all AIS cases, not only large vessel occlusion (LVO), from the stroke mimics is lacking. As a result, we intend to evaluate the accuracy of the RACE criteria in diagnosing of AIS in patients transferred to the emergency department (ED).MethodThe present study was a diagnostic accuracy cross-sectional study during 2021 in Iran. The study population consist of all suspected acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients who transferred to the ED by emergency medical services (EMS). A 3-part checklist consisting of the basic and demographic information of the patients, items related to the RACE scale, and the final diagnosis of the patients based on interpretation of patients’ brain MRI was used for data collection. All data were entered in Stata 14 software. We used the ROC analysis to evaluate the diagnostic power of the test.ResultIn this study, data from 805 patients with the mean age of 66.9 ± 13.9 years were studied of whom 57.5% were males. Of all the patients suspected of stroke who transferred to the ED, 562 (69.8%) had a definite final diagnosis of AIS. The sensitivity and specificity of the RACE scale for the recommended cut-off point (score ≥ 5) were 50.18% and 92.18%, respectively. According to the Youden J index, the best cut-off point for this tool for differentiating AIS cases was a score > 2, at which sensitivity and specificity were 74.73% and 87.65%, respectively.ConclusionIt seems that, the RACE scale is an accurate diagnostic tool to detect and screen AIS patients in ED, Of course, not at the previously suggested cut-off point (score ≥ 5), but at the score > 2.

Evaluation of the Rapid Arterial oCclusion Evaluation (RACE) scale in Upstate South Carolina, USA

ObjectivesSeveral stroke assessments have been designed for Emergency Medical Services to identify stroke patients with large vessel occlusion in the prehospital setting. The Rapid Arterial oCclusion Evaluation scale was developed in Spain, yet only few United States-based studies have confirmed findings from Spain. This study was designed to determine if the Rapid Arterial oCclusion Evaluation scale is a valid prehospital stroke assessment for identifying large vessel occlusion patients in South Carolina, USA. Materials and methodsThe performance of the Rapid Arterial oCclusion Evaluation scale was determined by calculating the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy at each score. The discriminative power of the Rapid Arterial oCclusion Evaluation score was evaluated using receiver operator characteristics. Comparison of the Rapid Arterial oCclusion Evaluation Scale to the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale was assessed using the Spearman's coefficient. ResultsThe Rapid Arterial oCclusion Evaluation scale had an acceptable discriminative power (c = 0.71). A score of ≥5 had a sensitivity of 0.71, specificity of 0.65, positive predictive value of 0.24, negative predictive value of 0.93, and accuracy of 0.66. There was a significant correlation between the Rapid Arterial Cclusion Evaluation score and the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (rho = 0.60). ConclusionThe Rapid Arterial oCclusion Evaluation scale performed comparably to the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale in South Carolina; however, performed lower than Spain. Future studies should investigate patient demographics and emergency medical services training to determine if these variables contribute to the results found in this study.

Predictors of the functional outcome after thrombolysis in an Egyptian patients\u2019 sample

BackgroundAbout 6.2 million individuals worldwide and approximately 200 Egyptians/100,000 citizens have cerebrovascular stroke annually, and only less than 1% of stroke patients received intravenous (IV) thrombolysis in 2014. Outcome of the ischemic stroke after IV thrombolysis varies, and there is lack of data about the predicting factors that contributes to the outcome of ischemic strokes after IV thrombolysis in Egypt.ObjectiveThe aim of this work is to study the predictors of the functional outcome of ischemic cerebrovascular stroke after IV thrombolysis in Egyptian patients.Patients and methodsThis is a prospective study that includes acute ischemic stroke patients who received IV thrombolysis at the Alexandria University Hospital during the year from February 2017 to February 2018, and they were evaluated initially by Rapid Arterial Occlusion Evaluation (RACE) scale and followed-up serially for 6 months after thrombolysis using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and modified ranking score (mRS).ResultsForty-five patients are included; 56% had favorable functional outcome (mRS 0–2) after 6 months, 68% had ≥ 4 points improvement in NIHSS after 6 months, and 13% had hemorrhagic conversion with 18% mortality rate. High initial RACE scale and long hospital stay are associated with poor functional outcome 6 months after thrombolysis.ConclusionStroke severity demonstrated by high initial RACE and the duration of hospital stay are the two most significant predictors with an impact on the functional outcome of ischemic cerebrovascular stroke after thrombolysis.

EMS Provider Preference Comparison Between the Pre-hospital ELVO Detection During Initial Care Transport (PREDICT) Scale and the Rapid Arterial Occlusion Evaluation (RACE) Scale

EMS Provider Preference Comparison Between the Pre-hospital ELVO Detection During Initial Care Transport (PREDICT) Scale and the Rapid Arterial Occlusion Evaluation (RACE) Scale

Prospective, Multi-centered, PRe-hospital Validation Study Of The Rapid Arterial Occlusion Evaluation (RACE) Scale For Detecting Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke In The United States Compared To The Original Study

Cruz, Aurora S MD; Viacava, Enzo F; Ugiliweneza, Beatrice; Dengzhi, Wang; White, Andrew; Khattar, Nicolas K; Adams, Shawn W MD; Gallimore, Bryan; Ding, Dale MD; Wolfe, Stacey Q MD; Heck, Donald; James, Robert F MD Author Information

REMOTE Ischemic Perconditioning Among Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients in Catalonia: REMOTE-CAT PROJECT.

Rationale: Remote ischemic perconditioning during cerebral ischemia (RIPerC) refers to the application of brief episodes of transient limb ischemia commonly to a limb, it represents a new safe, simple and low-cost paradigm in neuroprotection.Aim and/or Hypothesis: To evaluate the effects of RIPerC on acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients, applied in the ambulance, to improve functional outcomes compared with standard of care.Sample Size Estimates: A sample size of 286 patients in each arm achieves 80% power to detect treatment differences of 14% in the outcome, using a two-sided binomial test at significance level of 0.05, assuming that 40% of the control patients will experience good outcome and an initial misdiagnosis rate of 29%.Methods and Design: We aim to conduct a multicentre study of pre-hospital RIPerC application in AIS patients. A total of 572 adult patients diagnosed of suspected clinical stroke within 8 h of symptom onset and clinical deficit >0 according to prehospital rapid arterial occlusion evaluation (RACE) scale score will be randomized, in blocks of size 4, to RIPerC or sham. Patients will be stratified by RACE score scale. RIPerC will be started in the ambulance before hospital admission and continued in the hospital if necessary. It will consist of five cycles of electronic tourniquet inflation and deflation (5 min each). The cuff pressure for RIPerC will be 200 mmHg during inflation. Sham will only simulate vibration of the device.Study Outcome(s): The primary outcome will be the difference in the proportion of patients with good outcomes as defined by a mRS score of 2 or less at 90 days. Secondary outcomes to be monitored will include early neurological improvement rate, treatment related serious adverse event rates, size of the infarct volume, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, metabolomic and lipidomic response to RIPerC and Neuropsychological evaluation at 90 days.Discussion: Neuroprotective therapies could not only increase the benefits of available reperfusion therapies among AIS patients but also provide an option for patients who are not candidates for these treatments. REMOTE-CAT will investigate the clinical benefit of RIC as a new neuroprotective strategy in AIS.Clinical Trial Registration: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT03375762.

Leaving No Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke Behind: Reorganizing Stroke Systems of Care to Improve Timely Access to Endovascular Therapy.

Leaving No Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke Behind: Reorganizing Stroke Systems of Care to Improve Timely Access to Endovascular Therapy.

Rapid Arterial Occlusion Evaluation Scale Agreement between Emergency Medical Services Technicians and Neurologists

BackgroundRapid arterial occlusion evaluation (RACE) scale is a valid prehospital tool used to predict large vessel occlusion of major cerebral arteries in patients with suspected acute stroke. RACE scale administered by Emergency medicine services (EMS) technicians in the prehospital setting correlates well with NIH Stroke Scale score after patient arrival at a hospital. Despite this, the RACE scale is often characterized as too difficult for EMS technicians to accurately utilize. There are no data examining RACE scale accuracy in the prehospital setting comparing EMS technicians with neurologists. We sought to examine agreement between RACE scores calculated by EMS technicians and stroke neurologists in the prehospital setting during telestroke consultation. MethodsData for this observational cohort study were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed. EMS technicians in person and stroke specialized neurologists via televideo connection independently assessed suspected stroke patients and calculated RACE scores in the prehospital setting. We used a linearly weighted Cohen's kappa (kw) to estimate the extent of agreement for RACE score between EMS technicians and stroke neurologists. ResultsThirty-one patients with stroke symptoms were independently examined and assessed with the RACE scale by EMS technicians and stroke neurologists in the prehospital setting. Exact agreement on the RACE score was found in 24 of 31 (77%) patients. We found very good agreement between EMS technicians and stroke neurologists, kw = .818 (95% CI, .677-.960), P< .001. ConclusionsEMS technicians provide reliable RACE assessments in patients with suspected stroke, with agreement similar to stroke specialized neurologists in the prehospital setting.

Vision, Aphasia, Neglect Assessment for Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke

Background and PurposeVision, Aphasia, Neglect (VAN) is a large vessel occlusion (LVO) screening tool that was initially tested in a small study where emergency department (ED) nurses were trained to perform VAN assessment on stroke code patients. We aimed to validate the VAN assessment in a larger inpatient dataset. MethodsWe utilized a large dataset and used National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) performed by physicians to extrapolate VAN. VAN was compared to NIHSS greater than or equal to 6 and established prehospital LVO screening tools including Rapid Arterial Occlusion Evaluation scale (RACE), Field Assessment Stroke Triage for Emergency Destination (FAST-ED), and Cincinnati Pre-hospital Stroke Scale (CPSS). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), accuracy, and area under receiver operating characteristics curve was calculated to estimate the predictive value of LVO. ResultsVAN was comparable in sensitivity (79% versus 80%) and NPV (88% versus 87%) to NIHSS greater than or equal to 6. It was superior in specificity (69% versus 57%), PPV (53% versus 46%) and accuracy to NIHSS greater than or equal to 6 (72% versus 64%) with significant receiver operating curve (.74 versus .69, P = .02).VAN also had comparable area under the curve when compared to RACE, FAST-ED, and CPSS however slightly lower accuracy (69%-73%) compared to RACE (76%), FAST-ED (77%), and CPSS (75%). VAN had the highest NPV among all screening assessments (88%). ConclusionsVAN is a simple screening tool that can identify LVOs with adequate accuracy in hospital setting. Future studies need to be conducted in prehospital setting to validate its utility to detect LVOs in the field.

Transfer to the Local Stroke Center versus Direct Transfer to Endovascular Center of Acute Stroke Patients with Suspected Large Vessel Occlusion in the Catalan Territory (RACECAT): Study protocol of a cluster randomized within a cohort trial.

Optimal pre-hospital delivery pathways for acute stroke patients suspected to harbor a large vessel occlusion have not been assessed in randomized trials. To establish whether stroke subjects with rapid arterial occlusion evaluation scale based suspicion of large vessel occlusion evaluated by emergency medical services in the field have higher rates of favorable outcome when transferred directly to an endovascular center (endovascular treatment stroke center), as compared to the standard transfer to the closest local stroke center (local-SC). Multicenter, superiority, cluster randomized within a cohort trial with blinded endpoint assessment. Eligible patients must be 18 or older, have acute stroke symptoms and not have an immediate life threatening condition requiring emergent medical intervention. They must be suspected to have intracranial large vessel occlusion based on a pre-hospital rapid arterial occlusion evaluation scale of ≥5, be located in geographical areas where the default health authority assigned referral stroke center is a non-thrombectomy capable hospital, and estimated arrival at a thrombectomy capable stroke hospital in less than 7 h from time last seen well. Cluster randomization is performed according to a pre-established temporal sequence (temporal cluster design) with three strata: day/night, distance to the endovascular treatment stroke center, and week/week-end day. The primary endpoint is the modified Rankin Scale score at 90 days. The primary safety outcome is mortality at 90 days. The primary endpoint based on the modified intention-to-treat population is the distribution of modified Rankin Scale scores at 90 days analyzed under a sequential triangular design. The maximum sample size is 1754 patients, with two planned interim analyses when 701 (40%) and 1227 patients have completed follow-up. Hypothesized common odds ratio is 1.35.

Performance of the RACE Score for the Prehospital Identification of Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke in a Suburban/Rural EMS Service

Introduction: Emergency Medical Services (EMS) providers may identify and preferentially transport patients experiencing large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke to appropriate treatment centers. The Rapid Arterial oCclusion Evaluation (RACE) scale was created for prehospital LVO detection, yet few studies have evaluated its function in real-world EMS settings. Our objective was to assess the prehospital performance of the RACE scale for detecting LVO stroke following implementation at a large suburban/rural agency in the United States. Methods: In this retrospective analysis, all 9-1-1 patients with an EMS provider primary or secondary impression of stroke treated by the agency between June 1, 2016 and November 1, 2017 were eligible for inclusion. Patient data were abstracted using a standardized form completed by receiving hospitals. Performance for LVO detection at each RACE cutoff value was evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the discrimination of the RACE scale overall. A secondary analysis of RACE for patients experiencing strokes best treated at comprehensive stroke centers (LVO and intracerebral hemorrhage [ICH]) was conducted. Results: There were 440 patients with a documented RACE score and hospital outcome data included in the analysis. About half (51%, n = 220) were female and the median age was 70 years (IQR: 59–81). Last known well time was under 4.5 hours for 76% of patients (n = 261). Over half (61%, n = 269) had a hospital discharge diagnosis of stroke and 64/440 (15%) were classified as LVO. The ROC curve demonstrated adequate discrimination with a c-statistic of 0.72. Performance for identifying LVO in the prehospital setting was greatest for RACE scores ≥5 with a sensitivity of 66% and specificity of 72%, PPV of 29%, and NPV of 93%. A RACE score ≥5 for both LVO and ICH demonstrated sensitivity: 63%, specificity: 77%, PPV: 47% and NPV: 86%. Conclusion: The RACE scale demonstrated acceptable discrimination, yet the sensitivity and positive predictive value were lower in this cohort of EMS professionals in the United States than in the original validation study conducted in Spain. Further work is needed to determine the optimal prehospital screening tool for identification of LVO.

The Accuracy of Large Vessel Occlusion Recognition Scales in Telestroke Setting

Introduction: A significant proportion of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients who are evaluated through telestroke consultation are transferred to thrombectomy-capable stroke centers (TSCs) for concern of large vessel occlusion (LVO). Patient triage selection is commonly based on the clinical suspicion of LVO, which lacks specificity and could result in unnecessary transfers. In this study, we aimed to assess the accuracy of the most commonly used LVO recognition scales in telestroke setting. Methods: AIS patients transferred to TSCs for suspicion of an LVO were included in this retrospective study. Patients were evaluated by a stroke neurologist through a telestroke consult before transfer. The National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score documented by the stroke neurologist was retrieved from medical records and used to calculate five other LVO recognition scales (Rapid Arterial Occlusion Evaluation Scale [RACE], Field Assessment Stroke Triage for Emergency Destination [FAST-ED], Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Severity Scale [CPSSS], 3-item stroke scale [3I-SS], and Prehospital Acute Stroke Severity Scale [PASS]). We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive and negative predictive values, false positive rate (FPR), and false negative rate (FNR) of each score using published cutoffs and then examined all possible cutoff values for each of these scales in addition to the NIHSS. Results: A total of 439 patients were included in the final analysis. A total of 48.5% of patients had an LVO confirmed on computed tomography angiogram. RACE score had the highest accuracy (78%). Overall, the five derived LVO recognition scores have at least 10% FNR. When examining all possible cutoff values, the NIHSS (cutoff of 6) had a 3% FNR but 73% FPR (false transfer). Conclusion: The use of the NIHSS and other LVO recognition scores over telestroke may result in unnecessary transfers. Better diagnostic tools that could maximize sensitivity with acceptable specificity are urgently needed.

Značaj RACE (Rapid Arterial Occlusion Evaluation) skale u akutnom ishemijskom moždanom udaru

Introduction: Endovascular mechanical thrombectomy performed within the first 6 hours after the start of symptoms, with or without thrombolytic therapy, significantly reduces disability in patients with acute ischemic stroke and large vessel occlusion (LVO). The effectiveness of therapeutic modalities decreases over time recording the period from the start of symptoms to the therapeutic application. Identification of patients with ischemic stroke and LVO at the prehospital level is crucial for expedited transport to comprehensive endovascular centers. Objectives: To indicate the advantages and benefits of RACE scale in detecting patients with stroke and LVO in the prehospital settings. Methodology: A systematic review of the professional literature was performed in the index databases and leading scientific journals. The findings were systematized based on results and commented in the discussion. Results: The neurological "gold standard" for stroke severity rating is the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). Due to its complexity and time consuming there is a modified version created for the prehospital assessment called the Rapid Arterial Occlusion Evaluation (RACE) scale. For Emergency Medical Services the RACE scale represents a simple and practical screening test for LVO prediction, assessing 5 variables from the NIHSS scale, including motor and cortical functions. Conclusion: With higher sensitivity and slightly less specificity, the RACE scale could be an almost ideal prehospital test for LVO prediction. In our environment the RACE scale should become an integral part of the prehospital algorithms and connection between emergency physicians and vascular neulogists.

Predictors of Endovascular Treatment Among Stroke Codes Activated Within 6 Hours From Symptom Onset.

Background and Purpose- Prehospital stroke code activations help reducing workflow times during in-hospital triage. We aim to identify predictors of endovascular treatment (EVT) among stroke codes (SC) activated within 6 hours from symptom onset. Methods- CICAT (Codi Ictus Catalunya) is a prospective official mandatory registry of all SC in Catalunya. We studied all CICAT entries from 6 comprehensive stroke centers for 18 months. We recorded demographic, clinical, and imaging variables on admission. We explored the relationship between these variables and EVT Results- From 3944 SC, 2778 (70.4%) were admitted within 6 hours from symptom onset. Mean age was 72±15.3 years, median Rapid Arterial Occlusion Evaluation scale score 4 (interquartile range [IQR], 2-6), median onset-to-door time 89 minutes (IQR, 54-158), median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score 9 (IQR, 4-18), median Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score 10 (IQR, 8-10). Final diagnosis was ischemic stroke in 1762 patients (63.4%), hemorrhagic stroke in 359 (13.0%), transient ischemic attack in 164 (5.9%), and stroke-mimic in 493 (17.7%). A large vessel occlusion was confirmed in 720 (25.6%) patients. Of all SC, 16% (n=444) received EVT, with a median door-to-groin time of 77 minutes (IQR, 55-102). Baseline variables associated with EVT were premorbid modified Rankin Scale score <2 ( P<0.001), prehospital Rapid Arterial Occlusion Evaluation scale score >4 ( P=0.003), and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale on admission >8 ( P<0.001). National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale on admission was the only independent predictor of EVT. Although the rate of Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score 10 progressively decreased over time (0-3 hours, 73.2% versus 3-6 hours, 57.1%; P<0.01), the rate of Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score 6 remained >90% along time (0-3 hours, 95.1% versus 3-6 hours, 94.0%; P=0.25) and did not decrease over time. The chances to receive EVT and the presence of large vessel occlusion decreased over time. However, the rate of EVT was not different between patients admitted 0 to 3 hours (26.1%) and those admitted 3 to 6 hours (22.9%; P=0.2). Conclusions- Among SC within 6 hours from symptom onset, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale on admission was the only factor independently associated with EVT. Only 5% of these patients show an Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score <6 and this rate does not significantly increase over time. These data may be useful to generate direct transfer to angio-suite protocols based mainly on clinical severity.