Rapid Antigen Test Research Articles

Assessment of a SARS-CoV-2 population-wide rapid antigen testing in Italy: a modeling and economic analysis study.

This study aimed to compare the cost-effectiveness of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) mass testing, carried out in November 2020 in the Italian Bolzano/Südtirol province, to scenarios without mass testing in terms of hospitalizations averted and quality-adjusted life-year (QALYs) saved. We applied branching processes to estimate the effective reproduction number (Rt) and model scenarios with and without mass testing, assuming Rt = 0.9 and Rt = 0.95. We applied a bottom-up approach to estimate the costs of mass testing, with a mixture of bottom-up and top-down methodologies to estimate hospitalizations averted and incremental costs in case of non-intervention. Lastly, we estimated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), denoted by screening and related social costs, and hospitalization costs averted per outcome derived, hospitalizations averted and QALYs saved. The ICERs per QALY were €24249 under Rt = 0.9 and €4604 under Rt = 0.95, considering the official and estimated data on disease spread. The cost-effectiveness acceptability curves show that for the Rt = 0.9 scenario, at the maximum threshold willingness to pay the value of €40000, mass testing has an 80% probability of being cost-effective compared to no mass testing. Under the worst scenario (Rt = 0.95), at the willingness to pay threshold, mass testing has an almost 100% probability of being cost-effective. We provide evidence on the cost-effectiveness and potential impact of mass COVID-19 testing on a local healthcare system and community. Although the intervention is shown to be cost-effective, we believe the initiative should be carried out when there is initial rapid local disease transmission with a high Rt, as shown in our model.

RECCURENT CHRONIC DIARRHEA ON LOKAL FEMALE 4-MONTH-OLD CAT

Diarrhea in kittens is one of the most common ailments little veterinarians deal with. Clinical signs can vary in severity from mild self-limited diarrhea to potentially fatal acute hemorrhagic diarrhea syndrome. The purpose of writing this article is as additional information about handling cases of diarrhea in cats that can cause death. This report is about a 4-month-old domestic cat named Bam, with a body weight of 0,6 kg, which was presented to Udayana University veterinary teaching hospital because of representing complaints of not wanting to eat, profuse diarrhea, watery eyes, and flu. FPV antigen rapid test was performed and showed negative results. Hematological examination showed that the cat had leukocytosis, monocytosis, and neutrophilia. Causes of diarrhea apart from viral, bacterial and parasitic infections can be protozoa infections such as Giardia spp, Tritrichomonas foetus, Cryptosporidium spp. Treatment was carried out with Ringer's lactar fluid therapy, antibiotics amoxicillin, and cefotaxime, kaolin and pectin for anti-diarrhea, expectorant bromhexine HCL, and B-complex vitamins. At the time of hospitalization, the cat's health continued to improve and seemed active and his appetite increased. The cat was sent home on the 5th day, but four days later the cat came back to the hospital in a weak condition, did not want to eat and died with progressive weakness and depression. The need for complete, accurate and supportive investigations as well as intensive inpatient treatment until the animal is completely healthy and supportive therapy is very important to ensure the success of complete therapy. Rescue cats with sick conditions should be examined immediately so that they can be treated immediately and reduce the risk of death.

Clinical features and outcomes of COVID-19 patients previously vaccinated with COVID vaccine

Background: With countries facing multiple waves of COVID-19 disease throughout the world it is the need of the hour to vaccinate individuals to protect against the deadly virus. Vaccination has shown noteworthy results with reduction in cases, however despite of vaccination many individuals have been infected with SARS-CoV-2 virus. Aims and objectives were to compare the outcomes of COVID-19 positive individuals who have previously received at least one dose of COVID-19 vaccine with unvaccinated individuals and to study the demographic and clinical features in COVID-19 patients who have previously received at least one dose of COVID-19 vaccine. Methods: This prospective, observational single-center study considered adults patients from April to May 2021 who were diagnosed with COVID 19 infection by RT-PCR technique or Rapid Antigen Test. The sample size for the study was 3076, out of which 2969 were unvaccinated and 107 were vaccinated. Necessary clinical data were collected and selected subjects were followed up until discharge or death. Statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS version 24. Results: Out of 3076 patients, 2002 (65.08%) were males and 1074 (34.92%) were females. There were 2969 individuals (96.52 %) who were unvaccinated and 107 (3.48 %) individuals who had received at least one dose any of the COVID 19 vaccines. Among the unvaccinated individuals, 895 (30.1%) succumbed to death and 2074 (69.9%) were discharged. Among the vaccinated individuals 19 (17.8%) succumbed to death and 88 (82.2%) were discharged (Odds ratio-0.5002) (CI-0.3029 to 0.8265). Conclusions: Vaccination decreases the severity and mortality of the disease. Genetic variants might have a key role and further studies regarding the variants of SARS-CoV-2 is needed.

Field evaluations of four SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen tests during SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant wave in South Africa

BackgroundRapid antigen tests detecting SARS-CoV-2 were shown to be a useful tool in managing the COVID-19 pandemic. Here, we report on the results of a prospective diagnostic accuracy study of four SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen tests in a South African setting.MethodsRapid antigen test evaluations were performed through drive-through testing centres in Durban, South Africa, from July to December 2021. Two evaluation studies were performed: nasal Panbio COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device (Abbott) was evaluated in parallel with the nasopharyngeal Espline SARS-CoV-2 Ag test (Fujirebio), followed by the evaluation of nasal RightSign COVID-19 Antigen Rapid test Cassette (Hangzhou Biotest Biotech) in parallel with the nasopharyngeal STANDARD Q COVID-19 Ag test (SD Biosensor). The Abbott RealTime SARS-CoV-2 assay was used as a reference test.ResultsEvaluation of Panbio and Espline Ag tests was performed on 494 samples (31% positivity), while the evaluation of Standard Q and RightTest Ag tests was performed on 539 samples (13.17% positivity). The overall sensitivity for all four tests ranged between 60 and 72% with excellent specificity values (> 98%). Sensitivity increased to > 80% in all tests in samples with cycle number value < 20. All four tests performed best in samples from patients presenting within the first week of symptom onset.ConclusionsAll four evaluated tests detected a majority of the cases within the first week of symptom onset with high viral load.

Patterns of testing in the extensive Danish national SARS-CoV-2 test set-up.

The Danish national SARS-CoV-2 mass test system was among the most ambitious worldwide. We describe its set-up and analyse differences in patterns of testing per demography and time period in relation to the three waves of SARS-CoV-2 transmission in Denmark. We included all reported PCR- and rapid antigen-tests performed between 27 February 2020 and 10 March 2022 among all residents aged 2 years or above. Descriptive statistics and Poisson regression models were used to analyse characteristics of individuals tested for SARS-CoV-2 using a national cohort study design. A total of 63.7 million PCR-tests and 60.0 million rapid antigen-tests were performed in the study period, testing 90.9% and 78.8% of the Danish population at least once by PCR or antigen, respectively. Female sex, younger age, Danish heritage and living in the capital area were all factors positively associated with the frequency of PCR-testing. The association between COVID-19 vaccination and PCR-testing changed from negative to positive over time. We provide details of the widely available, free-of-charge, national SARS-CoV-2 test system, which served to identify infected individuals, assist isolation of infectious individuals and contact tracing, and thereby mitigating the spread of SARS-CoV-2 in the Danish population. The test system was utilized by nearly the entire population at least once, and widely accepted across different demographic groups. However, demographic differences in the test uptake did exist and should be considered in order not to cause biases in studies related to SARS-CoV-2, e.g., studies of transmission and vaccine effectiveness.

Creating access to SARS-CoV-2 screening and testing through community-based COVID-19 case-finding, observations from cross-sectional studies in Lesotho and Zambia.

The health impact of the COVID-19 pandemic largely depends on the ability of the healthcare systems to develop effective and adaptable preparedness and mitigation strategies. A collaborative initiative (BRCCH-EDCTP COVID-19 Initiative) was set up between Lesotho and Zambia early on in the pandemic, to jointly conduct a project to investigate creating access to SARS-CoV-2 screening and testing through community-based COVID-19 case-finding. Two different community case-finding strategies were deployed. In Lesotho, an approach was implemented whereby a community (village) health worker screened community members at their home or during community gatherings for COVID-19 signs and symptoms. All community members who screened positive were then offered SARS-CoV-2 testing. In Zambia, so-called community hubs, staffed by community health care workers, were set up at different locations in the community for people to walk in and get tested for SARS-CoV-2. Hubs changed location from week-to-week and targeted transmission hotspots. All persons visiting the hubs were offered testing for SARS-CoV-2 irrespective of self-reported signs and symptoms of COVID-19 though information was collected on occurrence of these. Testing in both approaches was done using SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen tests. Setting up testing in the community setting was feasible in both countries. In Lesotho in the village health worker approach, over a period of 46 weeks, 7221 persons were screened, and 49 (11.4%) SARS-COV-2 cases identified among 428 COVID-19 screen positive participants. In the community hubs among 3150 people tested, 166 (5.3%) SARS-CoV-2 cases were identified in a period of 26 weeks. From the community hubs approach, where all seen were offered COVID-19 testing it was learned that people screening positive for COVID-19 signs and symptoms were more likely to test SARS-COV-2 positive, especially those reporting classic COVID-19 symptoms like loss of sense/smell for a short period of time (1-3 days). In conclusion, in this project we learned that implementing COVID-19 screening and testing by lay health workers in the community is possible. Characteristics of the population screened, tested, and identified to have SARS-CoV-2 are described to help guide development of future testing strategies.

Evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of two point-of-care tests for COVID-19 when used in symptomatic patients in community settings in the UK primary care COVID diagnostic accuracy platform trial (RAPTOR-C19).

Point-of-care lateral flow device antigen testing has been used extensively to identify individuals with active SARS-CoV-2 infection in the community. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of two point-of-care tests (POCTs) for SARS-CoV-2 in routine community care. Adults and children with symptoms consistent with suspected current COVID-19 infection were prospectively recruited from 19 UK general practices and two COVID-19 testing centres between October 2020 and October 2021. Participants were tested by trained healthcare workers using at least one of two index POCTs (Roche-branded SD Biosensor Standard™ Q SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test and/or BD Veritor™ System for Rapid Detection of SARS-CoV-2). The reference standard was laboratory triplex reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-PCR) using a combined nasal/oropharyngeal swab. Diagnostic accuracy parameters were estimated, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), overall, in relation to RT-PCR cycle threshold and in pre-specified subgroups. Of 663 participants included in the primary analysis, 39.2% (260/663, 95% CI 35.5% to 43.0%) had a positive RT-PCR result. The SD Biosensor POCT had sensitivity 84.0% (178/212, 78.3% to 88.6%) and specificity 98.5% (328/333, 96.5% to 99.5%), and the BD Veritor POCT had sensitivity 76.5% (127/166, 69.3% to 82.7%) and specificity 98.8% (249/252, 96.6% to 99.8%) compared with RT-PCR. Sensitivity of both devices dropped substantially at cycle thresholds ≥30 and in participants more than 7 days after onset of symptoms. Both POCTs assessed exceed the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency target product profile's minimum acceptable specificity of 95%. Confidence intervals for both tests include the minimum acceptable sensitivity of 80%. In symptomatic patients, negative results on these two POCTs do not preclude the possibility of infection. Tests should not be expected to reliably detect disease more than a week after symptom onset, when viral load may be reduced. ISRCTN142269.

The importance of prevalence and pre-test probability on the microbiological diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2: the case of Spain in 2020.

The aim of this work was to estimate the conditioned probability for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection with reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), viral antigen rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDT), and antibody detection tests depending on the prevalence in the specific healthcare settings in Spain in 2020, and on the pre-test probability (PTP) according to the clinical situation, age and unknown or close contacts of the patient. Performance parameters of tests were obtained from literature. Prevalence data and PTP were obtained from Spanish sources and a survey, respectively. The post-test probability is the positive predictive value (PPV) when test is positive. For negative result, we also calculated the probability of having the infection (false negatives). For both RT-PCR and viral Ag-RDT, the lowest PPV values were for the population screenings. This strategy proved to be useful in ruling out infection but generates a high number of false positives. At individual level, both tools provided high PPV (≥ 97%) when the PTP values are over 35%. In seroprevalence studies, though the specificity of IgG alone tests is high, under low seroprevalence, false positives cannot be avoided. Total antibodies tests are useful for diagnosis of COVID-19 in those doubtful cases with RT-PCR or Ag-RDT tests being repeatedly negative. The interpretating of results depends not only on the accuracy of the test, but also on the prevalence of the infection in different settings, and the PTP associated to the patient before performing the test.

To PCR or not? The impact of shifting policy from PCR to rapid antigen tests to diagnose COVID-19 during the omicron epidemic: a nationwide surveillance study.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) had caused huge impacts worldwide. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is the mainstay diagnostic modality. In most hospitals in Taiwan, samples for PCR are collected at emergency department (ER) or outdoor clinics to avoid virus spread inside hospitals. Home rapid antigen test (RAT) is a feasible, low-cost, and convenient tool with moderate sensitivity and high specificity, which can be performed at home to reduce hospital visits. Due to comparably low severity of omicron variant and high vaccine coverage (~80% residents fully vaccinated with AstraZeneca, Moderna, or Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 vaccines as of March 2022), the policy was shifted from containment to co-existing with COVID-19 in Taiwan. Virus spread rapidly in the community after the ease of social restrictive measurements. To acquire a confirmed diagnosis, PCR testing was requested for people with suspected COVID-19 infection. As a consequence, people with respiratory symptoms or contact history surged into hospitals for PCR testing, thus, the medical capacity was challenged. The diagnostic policy was altered from PCR to RAT, but the impact of diagnostic policy change remains unclear. We conducted this study to investigate the number of COVID-19 cases, PCR testing, hospitalizations, mortalities, and hospital visits during the epidemic and evaluate the impact of diagnostic policy change on hospital visits. The diagnostic policy change was implemented in late May 2022. We used nationwide and hospital-based data of COVID-19 cases, PCR testing, hospitalizations, mortalities, and hospital visits before and after policy change as of 31 Jul 2022. During the omicron epidemic, significant and synchronous increase of COVID-19 patients, PCR testing, hospital visits were observed. COVID-19 cases increased exponentially since April 2022 and the COVID-19 patients peaked in June (1,943, 55,571, and 61,511 average daily new cases in April, May, and June, respectively). The PCR testing peaked in May (85,788 daily tests) with high positive rate (81%). The policy of RAT as confirmatory diagnosis was implemented on 26 May 2022 and a substantial decline of PCR testing numbers occurred (85,788 and 83,113 daily tests in May and June). People hospitalized for COVID-19 peaked in June (821.8 patients per day) and decreased in July (549.5 patients). The mortality cases also peaked in June (147 cases/day). This trend was also validated by the hospital-based data with a significant decrease of emergency department visits (11,397 visits in May while 8,126 visits in June) and PCR testing (21,314 in May and 6,158 in June). The proportion of people purely for PCR testing also decreased (10-26 vs. 5-14%, before and after policy change, respectively). The impact of diagnostic policy change was a complicated issue and our study demonstrated the huge impact of diagnostic policy on health seeking behavior. The PCR testing numbers and emergency department visits had substantial decrease after diagnostic policy change, and the plateau of epidemic peak eased gradually in ~1 month later. Widespread RAT application may contribute to the decreased hospital visits and preserve medical capacity. Our study provides some evidences for policy maker's reference.

A coupled experimental and statistical approach for an assessment of SARS-CoV-2 infection risk at indoor event locations

Indoor event locations are particularly affected by the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. At large venues, only incomplete risk assessments exist, whereby no suitable measures can be derived. In this study, a physical and data-driven statistical model for a comprehensive infection risk assessment has been developed. At venues displacement ventilation concepts are often implemented. Here simplified theoretical assumptions fail for the prediction of relevant airflows for airborne transmission processes. Thus, with locally resolving trace gas measurements infection risks are computed more detailed. Coupled with epidemiological data such as incidences, vaccination rates, test sensitivities, and audience characteristics such as masks and age distribution, predictions of new infections (mean), situational R-values (mean), and individual risks on- and off-seat can be achieved for the first time. Using the Stuttgart State Opera as an example, the functioning of the model and its plausibility are tested and a sensitivity analysis is performed with regard to masks and tests. Besides a reference scenario on 2022-11-29, a maximum safety scenario with an obligation of FFP2 masks and rapid antigen tests as well as a minimum safety scenario without masks and tests are investigated. For these scenarios the new infections (mean) are 10.6, 0.25 and 13.0, respectively. The situational R-values (mean) – number of new infections caused by a single infectious person in a certain situation – are 2.75, 0.32 and 3.39, respectively. Besides these results a clustered consideration divided by age, masks and whether infections occur on-seat or off-seat are presented. In conclusion this provides an instrument that can enable policymakers and operators to take appropriate measures to control pandemics despite ongoing mass gathering events.

Analyses of the Relationship Between the Results of Virus Isolation and Rapid Antigen Detection Tests of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR Test-Positive Specimens

Analyses of the Relationship Between the Results of Virus Isolation and Rapid Antigen Detection Tests of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR Test-Positive Specimens

COVID-19 and Tuberculosis: Unveiling the Dual Threat and Shared Solutions Perspective.

The year 2020 will likely be remembered as the year dominated by COVID-19, or coronavirus disease. The emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), responsible for this pandemic, can be traced back to late 2019 in China. The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted the tuberculosis (TB) care system, reducing TB testing and reporting. This can be attributed to the disruption of TB services and restrictions on patient movement, consequently increasing TB-related deaths. This perspective review aims to highlight the intersection between COVID-19 and TB, highlighting their dual threat and identifying shared solutions to address these two infectious diseases effectively. There are several shared commonalities between COVID-19 and tuberculosis, particularly the transmission of their causative agents, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Both pathogens are transmitted via respiratory tract secretions. TB and COVID-19 are diseases that can be transmitted through droplets and airborne particles, and their primary target is typically the lungs. Regarding COVID-19 diagnostics, several methods are available for rapid and accurate detection. These include RT-PCR, which can provide results within two hours, and rapid antigen test kits that offer results in just a few minutes. The availability of point-of-care self-testing further enhances convenience. On the other hand, various approaches are employed for TB diagnostics to swiftly identify active TB. These include sputum microscopy, sputum for reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), and chest X-rays. These methods enable the rapid detection of active TB on the same day, while culture-based testing may take significantly longer, ranging from 2 to 8 weeks. The utilization of diverse diagnostic tools helps ensure the timely identification and management of COVID-19 and TB cases. The quality of life of patients affected by COVID-19 and tuberculosis (TB) can be significantly impacted due to the nature of these diseases and their associated challenges. In conclusion, it is crucial to emphasize the urgent need to address the dual threat of COVID-19 and TB. Both diseases have devastated global health, and their convergence poses an even greater challenge. Collaborative efforts, research investments, and policy reforms are essential to tackle this dual threat effectively.

COVID-19 scent dog research highlights and synthesis during the pandemic of December 2019-April 2023.

This review was undertaken to provide information concerning the advancement of research in the area of COVID-19 screening and testing during the worldwide pandemic from December 2019 through April 2023. In this review, we have examined the safety, effectiveness, and practicality of utilizing trained scent dogs in clinical and public situations for COVID-19 screening. Specifically, results of 29 trained scent dog screening peer-reviewed studies were compared with results of real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and rapid antigen (RAG) COVID-19 testing methods. The review aims to systematically evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of utilizing trained scent dogs in COVID-19 screening. At the time of submission of our earlier review paper in August 2021, we found only four peer-reviewed COVID-19 scent dog papers: three clinical research studies and one preprint perspective paper. In March and April 2023, the first author conducted new literature searches of the MEDLINE/PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library websites. Again, the keyword phrases utilized for the searches included "COVID detection dogs," "COVID scent dogs," and "COVID sniffer dogs." The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 Checklist was followed to ensure that our review adhered to evidence-based guidelines for reporting. Utilizing the results of the reviewed papers, we compiled statistics to intercompare and summarize basic information concerning the scent dogs and their training, the populations of the study participants, the types of sampling methods, the comparative tests utilized, and the effectiveness of the scent dog screening. A total of 8,043 references were identified through our literature search. After removal of duplicates, there were 7,843 references that were screened. Of these, 100 were considered for full-text eligibility, 43 were included for qualitative synthesis, and 29 were utilized for quantitative analysis. The most relevant peer-reviewed COVID-19 scent dog references were identified and categorized. Utilizing all of the scent dog results provided for this review, we found that 92.3 % of the studies reached sensitivities exceeding 80 and 32.0 % of the studies exceeding specificities of 97 %. However, 84.0 % of the studies reported specificities above 90 %. Highlights demonstrating the effectiveness of the scent dogs include: (1) samples of breath, saliva, trachea-bronchial secretions and urine as well as face masks and articles of clothing can be utilized; (2) trained COVID-19 scent dogs can detect presymptomatic and asymptomatic patients; (3) scent dogs can detect new SARS-CoV-2 variants and Long COVID-19; and (4) scent dogs can differentiate SARS-CoV-2 infections from infections with other novel respiratory viruses. The effectiveness of the trained scent dog method is comparable to or in some cases superior to the real-time RT-PCR test and the RAG test. Trained scent dogs can be effectively utilized to provide quick (seconds to minutes), nonintrusive, and accurate results in public settings and thus reduce the spread of the COVID-19 virus or other viruses. Finally, scent dog research as described in this paper can serve to increase the medical community's and public's knowledge and acceptance of medical scent dogs as major contributors to global efforts to fight diseases.

Comprehensive mapping of SARS-CoV-2 inhibition using essential or vegetable oils

IntroductionThe new SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) has spread exponentially since the first recognition of the new virus and continues to infect millions of individuals worldwide. The importance of contaminated surfaces in transmission is uncertain. Minimizing surface contact, hand hygiene after surface contact, and cleaning and disinfecting the environment are recommended to reduce the risk of acquiring SARS-CoV-2. As surfaces are prone to transmitting COVID-19 infection, highly exposed surface areas need to be cleaned frequently with a suitable disinfectant. Essential oils have been extensively used as antimicrobial extract for several microorganisms. However, no experimental studies have previously investigated these compounds against the SARS-CoV-2. ObjectivesIn this work, we conducted a comprehensive mapping of SARS-CoV-2 protein denaturation using different essential oils (EO) aiming at the future development of natural disinfectants. MethodsThe tested oils were melaleuca, cinnamon, cardamom, buriti, and linalool. Positive nasopharyngeal samples of COVID-19 patients were exposed in direct contact with EOs, at different times, and the virus elimination efficiency was verified through an immunochromatographic Rapid Antigen Test. ResultsThe best EOs were Melaleuca alternifolia and Cinnamomum cassia, which denatured SARS-CoV-2 proteins at least with 5 min of contact by interfering with the viral envelope or the spike protein. Cardamom oil probably damaged the virus capsid, and buriti oil disrupted the viral protein envelop. Linalool oil did not denature SARS-CoV-2 proteins. ConclusionsOils have a considerable potential to produce ecologically friendly disinfectants that can inactivate SARS-CoV-2 in different contact times depending on the mechanism of action and oil-active compounds.

A comparative study of second (delta) wave and third (omicron) wave of Covid -19 based on positivity rates at a sub-district hospital in Goa

The covid-19 outbreak was due to a virus which emerged in china at the end of December 2019, and was widespread in more than 200 countries worldwide. In India, the virus was introduced first by travelers returning home from various countries followed by local transmission. The SARS-CoV-2 variants B.1.1.7 (Alpha), B.1.617.2 (Delta), and B.1.1.529 (Omicron) caused rapid increase of infections worldwide. A retrospective study was carried out in a sub district hospital of south Goa during second covid wave of delta variant and third covid wave of omicron variant. Throat and nasopharngeal swabs were collected in flu OPD and sent to covid lab for RTPCR by truenat and rapid antigen tests. The positivity rates were calculated and data was used to find out various differences observed in both the waves. The peak positivity rate was 61% in mid april during delta wave and 66% in mid January during omicron wave. Signs and symptoms of fever, shortness of breadth/difficult in breathing, sore throat, cough and fatigue were seen along with minor symptoms such as malaise, headache, loss of sense of smell and taste, nausea/vomiting and diarrhea. Males were more affected than females. Rate of infection were less in immunised individuals. Adults and youth were affected more in number as compared to elderly and children. In both the waves, travellers going outside state showed low positivity.The arm of the sea variant confirmed to pose a important health burden to the society on account of allure pulmonary belongings and reduced immunization coverage all along the epidemic. Due to the communicable character of two together waves, Covid experiment far surpassed the capacity of workshops to process sample books, procrastinating newsgathering and situation. The study climaxes the burden of the pandemic on states and thus the significance of voters following COVID-19 contracts for fear that this transmission.

Influenza transmission during COVID-19 measures downscaling in Greece, August 2022: evidence for the need of continuous integrated surveillance of respiratory viruses.

After the near absence of influenza and other respiratory viruses during the first 2 years of the COVID-19 pandemic, an increased activity of mainly influenza A(H3N2) was detected at the beginning of August 2022 in Greece on three islands. Of 33 cases with respiratory symptoms testing negative for SARS-CoV-2 with rapid antigen tests, 24 were positive for influenza: 20 as A(H3N2) subtype and four as A(H1N1)pdm09 subtype. Phylogenetic analysis of selected samples from both subtypes was performed and they fell into clusters within subclades that included the 2022/23 vaccine strains. Our data suggest that influenza can be transmitted even in the presence of another highly infectious pathogen, such as SARS-CoV-2, with a similar transmission mode. We highlight the need for implementing changes in the current influenza surveillance and suggest a move from seasonal to continuous surveillance, especially in areas with a high number of tourists. Year-round surveillance would allow for a timelier start of vaccination campaigns and antiviral drugs procurement processes.

Novel, accurate pathogen sensors for fast detection of SARS-CoV-2 in the aerosol in seconds for a breathalyzer platform

Rapid and accurate detection of the pathogens, such as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) for COVID-19, is critical for mitigating the COVID-19 pandemic. Current state-of-the-art pathogen tests for COVID-19 diagnosis are done in a liquid medium and take 10–30 min for rapid antigen tests and hours to days for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests. Herein we report novel accurate pathogen sensors, a new test method, and machine-learning algorithms for a breathalyzer platform for fast detection of SARS-CoV-2 virion particles in the aerosol in 30 s. The pathogen sensors are based on a functionalized molecularly-imprinted polymer, with the template molecules being the receptor binding domain spike proteins for different variants of SARS-CoV-2. Sensors are tested in the air and exposed for 10 s to the aerosols of various types of pathogens, including wild-type, D614G, alpha, delta, and omicron variant SARS-CoV-2, BSA (Bovine serum albumin), Middle East respiratory syndrome–related coronavirus (MERS-CoV), influenza, and wastewater samples from local sewage. Our low-cost, fast-responsive pathogen sensors yield accuracy above 99% with a limit-of-detection (LOD) better than 1 copy/μL for detecting the SARS-CoV-2 virus from the aerosol. The machine-learning algorithm supporting these sensors can accurately detect the pathogens, thereby enabling a new and unique breathalyzer platform for rapid COVID-19 tests with unprecedented speeds.

Evaluation of Rapid Antigen Test Results and RT-PCR for Laboratory Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2

Evaluation of Rapid Antigen Test Results and RT-PCR for Laboratory Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2

Antigen test swabs are comparable to nasopharyngeal swabs for sequencing of SARS-CoV-2

Viral genomic surveillance has been integral in the global response to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Surveillance efforts rely on the availability of representative clinical specimens from ongoing testing activities. However, testing practices have recently shifted due to the widespread availability and use of rapid antigen tests, which could lead to gaps in future monitoring efforts. As such, genomic surveillance strategies must adapt to include laboratory workflows that are robust to sample type. To that end, we compare the results of RT-qPCR and viral genome sequencing using samples from positive BinaxNOW COVID-19 Antigen Card swabs (N = 555) to those obtained from nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs used for nucleic acid amplification testing (N = 135). We show that swabs obtained from antigen cards are comparable in performance to samples from NP swabs, providing a viable alternative and allowing for the potential expansion of viral genomic surveillance to outpatient clinic as well as other settings where rapid antigen tests are often used.

Accuracy of Expired BinaxNOW Rapid Antigen Tests.

The widespread existence of expired antigen testing kits in households and potential coronavirus outbreaks necessitates evaluating the reliability of these expired kits. Our study examined BinaxNOW COVID-19 rapid antigen tests 27 months postmanufacture and 5 months past their FDA extended expiration dates, using SARS-CoV-2 variant XBB.1.5 viral stock. We conducted testing at two concentrations, the limit of detection (LOD) and 10 times the LOD. One hundred expired and unexpired kits were tested at each concentration for a total of 400 antigen tests. At the LOD (2.32 × 102 50% tissue culture infective dose/mL [TCID50/mL]), both expired and unexpired tests displayed 100% sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI], 96.38% to 100%), with no statistical difference (95% CI, -3.92% to 3.92%). Similarly, at 10 times the LOD, unexpired tests retained 100% sensitivity (95% CI, 96.38% to 100%), while expired tests exhibited 99% sensitivity (95% CI, 94.61% to 99.99%), demonstrating a statistically insignificant 1% difference (95% CI, -2.49% to 4.49%; P = 0.56). Expired rapid antigen tests had fainter lines than the unexpired tests at each viral concentration. The expired rapid antigen tests at the LOD were only just visible. These findings carry significant implications for waste management, cost efficiency, and supply chain resilience in pandemic readiness efforts. They also provide critical insights for formulating clinical guidelines for interpreting results from expired kits. In light of expert warnings of a potential outbreak of a severity rivaling the Omicron variant, our study underscores the importance of maximizing the utility of expired antigen testing kits in managing future health emergencies. IMPORTANCE The study examining the reliability of expired antigen testing kits in the context of COVID-19 has significant real-world implications. By demonstrating that these expired kits retain their sensitivity in detecting the virus, this work provides evidence that expired kits can still be utilized, reducing waste and optimizing resources in health care systems. These findings are especially crucial in light of potential future coronavirus outbreaks and the need to be prepared. The study's outcomes have the potential to contribute to waste management efforts, cost efficiency, and supply chain resilience, ensuring that diagnostic tests remain readily available for effective public health interventions. Furthermore, it provides critical insights for formulating clinical guidelines on interpreting results from expired kits, enhancing the accuracy of testing outcomes, and supporting informed decision-making. Ultimately, this work holds great importance in maximizing the utility of expired antigen testing kits, safeguarding public health, and enhancing pandemic readiness on a global scale.