Lateral Bending Range Of Motion Research Articles

The Use of an Interspinous Implant in Conjunction With a Graded Facetectomy Procedure

The range of motion (ROM) of lumbar cadaver spines was measured during flexion, extension, axial rotation, and lateral bending following graded facetectomies and implantation of an X STOP interspinous spacer implant. The study was performed undertaken to understand better the influence of the interspinous spacer implant on the kinematics of the lumbar spine following graded facetectomies. Lateral lumbar spinal stenosis is often treated with a unilateral or bilateral facetectomy procedure. Previous biomechanical research has shown that a facetectomy may increase the ROM during flexion and axial rotation. Seven cadaver spines (L2-L5) were tested in flexion, extension, axial rotation, and lateral bending, and the individual ROM of each motion segment was measured. Specimens were tested intact and following 3 graded facetectomies (i.e., unilateral medial facetectomy [UMF], unilateral total facetectomy [UTF], and bilateral total facetectomy [BTF]), with and without the X STOP. A BTF caused a significant increase in ROM during flexion and axial rotation but not extension and lateral bending. The UMF and UTF did not affect the ROM during any of the 4 motions. The interspinous implant: (1) significantly decreased the flexion ROM for the intact, UMF, UTF, and BTF treatments; (2) significantly decreased the extension ROM for the intact, UMF, and BTF treatments but not the UTF (P < 0.13); (3) had no significant effect on the axial rotation ROM; and (4) significantly increased the lateral bending ROM for the UMF, UTF, and BTF treatments. The results suggest that the implant may be used in conjunction with a UMF or UTF. However, the X STOP should not be used in conjunction with BTF.

Finite element analysis of moment-rotation relationships for human cervical spine

A comprehensive, geometrically accurate, nonlinear C0–C7 FE model of head and cervical spine based on the actual geometry of a human cadaver specimen was developed. The motions of each cervical vertebral level under pure moment loading of 1.0 Nm applied incrementally on the skull to simulate the movements of the head and cervical spine under flexion, tension, axial rotation and lateral bending with the inferior surface of the C7 vertebral body fully constrained were analysed. The predicted range of motion (ROM) for each motion segment were computed and compared with published experimental data. The model predicted the nonlinear moment-rotation relationship of human cervical spine. Under the same loading magnitude, the model predicted the largest rotation in extension, followed by flexion and axial rotation, and least ROM in lateral bending. The upper cervical spines are more flexible than the lower cervical levels. The motions of the two uppermost motion segments account for half (or even higher) of the whole cervical spine motion under rotational loadings. The differences in the ROMs among the lower cervical spines (C3–C7) were relatively small. The FE predicted segmental motions effectively reflect the behavior of human cervical spine and were in agreement with the experimental data. The C0–C7 FE model offers potentials for biomedical and injury studies.

Biomechanical stability of five stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion constructs

Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) cages are expected to reduce segmental mobility. Current ALIF cages have different designs, suggesting differences in initial stability. The objective of this study was to compare the effect of different stand-alone ALIF cage constructs and cage-related features on initial segmental stability. Human multisegmental specimens were tested intact and with an instrumented L3/4 disc level. Five different ALIF cages (I/F, BAK, TIS, SynCage, and ScrewCage) were tested non-destructively in axial rotation, flexion/extension and lateral bending. A cage 'pull-out' concluded testing. Changes in neutral zone (NZ) and range of motion (ROM) were analyzed. Cage-related measurements normalized to vertebral dimensions were used to predict NZ and ROM. No cage construct managed to reduce NZ. The BAK and TIS cages had the largest NZ increase in flexion/extension and lateral bending, respectively. Cages did reduce ROM in all loading directions. The TIS cage was the least effective in reducing the ROM in lateral bending. Cages with sharp teeth had higher 'pull-out' forces. Antero-posterior and mediolateral cage dimensions, cage height and wedge angle were found to influence initial stability. The performance of stand-alone ALIF cage constructs generally increased the NZ in any loading direction, suggesting potential directions of initial segmental instability that may lead to permanent deformity. Differences between cages in flexion/extension and lateral bending NZ are attributed to the severity of geometrical cage-endplate surface mismatch. Stand-alone cage constructs reduced ROM effectively, but the residual ROM present indicates the presence of micromotion at the cage-endplate interface.

Intervertebral disc distraction with a laparoscopic anterior spinal fusion system.

The BAK spinal fusion system has been applied to laparoscopic anterior lumbar interbody fusion. The system, consisting of a pair of cylindrical implants with threads, placed symmetrically about the sagittal plane, functions by tensioning the annulus fibrosis. Cylindrical plugs of increasing size are inserted prior to the implant placement. As the procedure may affect spinal posture and disc height, we measured changes due to incremental plug insertion using human cadaveric spine specimens (L5-S1, n = 4). Multi-directional flexibility of the construct was also measured as a function of plug size. The disc height change was found to increase initially and then to level off at 13-mm diameter plugs. In the sagittal plane, the intervertebral posture first shifted towards kyphotic then came back to the initial lordotic posture with plugs of bigger size. However, changes in disc height and spine posture were not statistically significant. Comparing the neutral zone (NZ) flexibility after inserting the plugs to the intact values, neither the flexion/extension nor the axial rotation NZ showed any significant change. In lateral bending, the NZ decreased after the insertion of 13-mm plugs (p < 0.05). Insertion of plugs of increasing size from 9 mm to 12 mm decreased the range of motion (ROM) in all directions (p < 0.05). Insertion of 13-mm and 14-mm plugs decreased the flexion/extension and lateral bending ROM, but not the axial rotation ROM, probably indicating some injury to the annulus fibers.

Fracture pattern and instability of thoracolumbar injuries.

Spinal fractures are common in the thoracolumbar region. Assessment of fracture instability is often made from fracture pattern seen on plain radiographs or CT scans. The purpose of this in vitro study was to correlate three-dimensional flexibility to each fracture type, i.e., endplate, wedge, and burst. Ten fresh cadaveric human spine specimens (T11-L1) were incrementally impacted in a high-speed trauma apparatus until a fracture occurred. All fractures were produced by the same mechanism (axial compression/flexion load). The occurrence of a fracture was monitored by lateral radiographs of the specimen, whose canal was lined with 1.6-mm steel balls. After each impact, the specimen was studied for its flexibility in flexion, extension, left and right lateral bindings, and left and right axial rotations. The flexibility was determined in response to the application of maximum pure moments of 7.5 Nm. Each moment was applied individually and in three load cycles. Parameters of neutral zone (NZ) and range of motion (ROM) were computed. Average flexion-extension ROM (and NZ) for intact, endplate, wedge, and burst fracture were respectively, 12.7 degrees (1.3 degrees), 13.9 degrees (1.7 degrees), 19.2 degrees (3.2 degrees), 22.0 degrees (6.0 degrees). The average lateral bending ROM (NZ) were 12.6 degrees (1.2 degrees), 13.6 degrees (1.9 degrees), 19.1 degrees (3.7 degrees), 27.2 degrees (9.8 degrees). The average axial rotation ROM (NZ) were 4.7 degrees (0.4 degree), 6.1 degrees (0.7 degrees), 7.1 degrees (1.0 degree), 12.9 degrees (3.1 degrees).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Discussion of "aspects of cerebral circulatory physiology of relevance to cerebrovascular disease".

<h3>Background</h3> The influence of interbody cage positioning on clinical outcomes following lumbar interbody fusion is not well understood, though it has been hypothesized to play a significant role in stability of the treated level. The purpose of this study was to evaluate any correlations between cage placement in TLIF procedures and post-operative kinematics. <h3>Methods</h3> Thirteen patients who had previously undergone a TLIF procedure were evaluated using the Vertebral Motion Analysis (VMA) system, an automated fluoroscopic method of tracking kinematics in vivo. Upright and recumbent bending platforms were used to guide patients through a set range of motion (ROM) standing up and lying down, respectively, in both flexion-extension (FE) and lateral bending (LB). Intervertebral ROM was measured via fluoroscopic images captured sequentially throughout the movement. DICOM images acquired by the VMA system were used to calculate cage positioning. Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of TLIF cage position were also assessed. <h3>Results</h3> Statistically significant correlations were noted between sagittal cage position and lying LB (r = -0.583, p = 0.047), and coronal cage positioning with both standing (r = 0.672, p = 0.012) and lying LB (r = 0.632, p = 0.027). Additionally, the correlation between sagittal cage position and standing FE was trending towards significance (r = -0.542, p = 0.055). <h3>Conclusions</h3> The intuitive correlation between coronal cage position and both standing and lying lateral bending ROM is supported by the data from this study, suggesting placement closer to midline is optimal for stability. Additionally, the VMA system appears to be a sensitive and repeatable means to obtain information on postoperative kinematic outcomes. Further work to establish the relationship between cage placement, these kinematic outcomes and, potentially, functional pain outcomes seems to be warranted based on the results obtained here.