Combining pharmacologic agents with mechanical ripening achieves the shortest labor, yet there is no clear evidence on route of drug administration in patients with obesity. Our objective was to evaluate the difference in time to delivery of buccal compared to vaginal misoprostol in combination with a Foley catheter (FC) for labor induction (IOL) in the obese population. This was a planned secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial comparing identical dosages (25μg) of buccal and vaginal misoprostol in combination with a FC. Labor management was standardized among participants. Women undergoing IOL at ≥37 weeks with a singleton gestation and cervical dilation ≤2cm were included. Body mass index (BMI, kg/m2) was stratified. Our primary outcome was time to delivery. Kruskal-Wallis, Pearson chi-square and Cox survival analyses with intent-to-treat principles were performed. 215 participants were included with the following weight stratifications: 55 (25.6%) BMI < 30; 110 (51.2%) BMI 30-39.9; 50 (23.3%) BMI ≥40. Demographic characteristics were similar between the three groups. Vaginal drug administration achieved a faster median time to delivery than the buccal route among patients with a BMI range of 30-39.9, (vaginal miso–FC: 21.3hrs vs. buccal miso–FC: 23.6hrs, p=0.04). There was no difference in the cesarean delivery rate between the various groups. Furthermore, patients with a BMI range of 30-39.9 receiving vaginal misoprostol delivered 1.2 times faster than women who received buccal misoprostol after censoring for Cesarean delivery and adjusting for parity, (Hazard Ratio [HR] 1.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-1.7). There were no significant differences in maternal and neonatal outcomes. We found that vaginal misoprostol was superior to buccal misoprostol when combined with a FC among individuals with a BMI range of 30-39.9. Therefore, vaginal misoprostol should be the preferred route of drug administration for term IOL in this population.View Large Image Figure ViewerDownload Hi-res image Download (PPT)
Read full abstract