Random-effects Model Meta-analysis Research Articles

Diagnostic Performance of TOF, 4D MRA, ASL and SWAN sequences in the Post-Radiosurgery Monitoring of Brain Arteriovenous Malformation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Brain Arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are congenital anomalies of the cerebrovascular system, often discovered incidentally or through symptomatic presentations such as intracranial hemorrhage, seizure, headache, or neurological deficits. Various treatment modalities exist for AVMs, including radiosurgery, a treatment modality that is noninvasive and efficient. Accurate imaging is crucial for risk assessment, treatment planning, and monitoring of these patients before and after radiosurgery. Currently, Digital Subtraction Angiography (DSA) stands as the preferred imaging modality. Despite its efficacy, DSA is notably invasive, presenting inherent risks to the patients. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the efficacy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences for monitoring brain AVMs after radiosurgery. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase databases was done and methodological quality assessment performed with the QUADAS-2 checklist diagnostic test accuracy. We utilized the bivariate random-effects meta-analysis model (BRMA) with STATA/MP 17 software for data analysis. No significant publication bias was detected.14 studies were eligible for qualitative and quantitative analysis. MRI offers high sensitivity (85%) and specificity (99%) in detecting residual AVMs. Different MRI sequences, including 3DTOF MRA, 4D-MRA, and ASL demonstrated varying diagnostic accuracies with area under the curve (AUC) of 0.92, 0.97, and 0.96 respectively. 4D-MRA exhibited a sensitivity of 72% and specificity of 99%, ASL showed a sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 92% while 3D-TOF MRA showed 90% sensitivity and 87% specificity. Meta-regression did not fully explain the sources of heterogeneity. Only one study assessed the SWAN method, and most studies involved small participant groups with varied MR techniques and sequences. Additionally, the retrospective nature of most studies may introduce bias, warranting cautious interpretation of the results. MRI sequences show acceptable diagnostic performance in post-radiosurgery monitoring of brain AVMs, with ASL and 4D-MRA showing acceptable diagnostic accuracy. Combining different MRI sequences may further enhance diagnostic reliability. However, Further investigation is needed to assess whether MRI sequences can serve as a feasible substitute for DSA, taking into account their risk-benefit profile, with the potential to establish them as the recommended standard.

The Association between Problematic Instagram Use, Psychological Distress, and Well-Being: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Recent studies have indicated the potential detrimental psychological effects of Instagram use (IU) and problematic Instagram use (PIU). PIU and IU have been associated with depression, anxiety, and negative general well-being. This study aimed to investigate that correlation through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sevendatabases, including PubMed/MEDLINE, were explored in February of 2023. Studies that assessed the association between IU and/or PIU with depression, anxiety, other psychological distresses, and/or general well-being were deemed eligible. The Hunter-Schmidt random effects model and multilevel meta-analysis were appliedto assess the outcomes of interest. A total of 1,927 hits were identified with 37 studies included in the quantitative analysis after removal of duplicates and screening of abstracts and full texts, with the total number of participants at 14,305. The obtained correlations between PIU and depression, anxiety, and well-being with 95% confidence interval were found to be r = 0.35, [0.25, 0.44], r = 0.31, [0.22, 0.40], r = -0.17, [-0.24, -0.10], respectively. Similarly, for IU and depression r = 0.11, [0.06, 0.16], p < 0.05 for all of the aforementioned results. The association between IU and anxiety was found to be r = 0.12, [0.04, 0.21], p < 0.05. The present meta-analysis found significant conceptual heterogeneity across the studies included due to different study designs and population heterogeneity. The results show a positive association of PIU and IU with depression, anxiety, and other psychological distress(es). There is a need for robust designed longitudinal research to explore this association.

Effects of game-based digital interventions for mental disorders: A meta-analysis

With increasing research attention on game-based digital interventions for mental disorders, a number of studies have been conducted to explore the effectiveness of digital game-based interventions on mental disorders. However, findings from previous research were inconsistent. Thus, we conducted a comprehensive meta-analytic review of the effectiveness of game-based digital interventions for mental disorders. By searching the articles in databases, we identified 53 studies in which 2433 participants were involved, and 282 effect sizes were extracted. Among the 53 studies, 14 employed within-group (pre/post) designs, and the remaining 39 utilized controlled trial designs. Using a three-level random-effects meta-analytic model, a medium effect size of game-based digital interventions (g = 0.47, 95 % CI: 0.33, 0.61) was revealed in the controlled trial designs and a close-to-medium effect size (g = 0.45, 95 % CI: 0.32, 0.58) was found in the within-group (pre/post) designs, indicating close-to-medium-sized efficacy of game-based digital interventions for mental disorders. Moderator analyses showed that age in the controlled trial designs had contributed to the heterogeneity in previous studies, suggesting that interventions might be more effective for the elderly. However, given that only a limited number of studies were focused on the elderly, more studies with older participants should be conducted in the future to provide more robust evidence and explore the mechanisms of how digital gaming interventions can be more effective in improving mental disorders symptoms.

The Effect of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy on Right Ventricular Function: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Right ventricular (RV) failure is an important predicting factor regarding overall and event-free survival regardless of baseline left ventricular (LV) function in patients with severe heart failure (HF). Previous studies have indicated that cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves LV and RV reverse remodeling in patients with systolic dyssynchrony within the left ventricle. However, there is conflicting evidence regarding the role of CRT in RV function. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine the implications of CRT on RV function indices. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted using the MedLine and EMBASE databases and the Cochrane Library from their inception until 18 March 2024. Eligible were studies providing information on RV function indices, both at baseline and after CRT. Evidence was summarized using random-effects meta-analytic models. Results: In total, 30 studies were deemed eligible. CRT resulted in a significant improvement in right ventricular fractional area change (mean difference (MD) 5.11%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.83 to 7.39), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE, MD 1.63 mm, 95% CI 1.10 to 2.16), and myocardial systolic excursion velocity (MD 1.85 cm/s, 95% CI 1.24 to 2.47) as well as a significant decrease in pulmonary artery systolic pressure (MD -6.24 mmHg, 95% CI -8.32 to -4.16). A non-significant effect was observed on TAPSE to PASP ratio and right ventricular global longitudinal strain. Conclusions: Our meta-analysis demonstrates that CRT is associated with a significant improvement in echocardiographic parameters of RV function. Further investigation is necessary to elucidate how these changes, both independently and in conjunction with LV improvement, impact patients' long-term prognosis, and to identify the specific patient populations expected to derive the greatest benefit.

Efficacy and safety of proton therapy versus intensity-modulated radiation therapy in the treatment of head and neck tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

To comprehensively evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and safety when utilizing proton therapy (PT) versus intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in head and neck cancer patients. Pubmed, ScienceDirect, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science were systematically searched for studies on comparative PT and IMRT outcomes. We performed a random effect model meta-analysis to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) and odds ratio (OR) for efficacy and safety outcome variables between PT and IMRT. From 641 identified articles, 11 studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising 3087 patients (606 treated with PT and 2481 with IMRT). On toxicity analysis, PT is associated with decreased acute grade 1 nausea (OR = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.13-0.84, p = 0.02) compared to IMRT. In grade 2 toxicity, PT showed significant advantages over IMRT in mucositis (OR = 0.44, p < 0.0001), dysgeusia (OR = 0.35, p = 0.02), dysphagia (OR = 0.36, p < 0.0001), fatigue (OR = 0.29, p = 0.001), pain (OR = 0.34, p = 0.01), and weight loss (OR = 0.54, p = 0.02). Proton therapy also exhibited increased safety in grade 3 dysphagia incidence (OR = 0.44, p < 0.0001) compared to IMRT. PT demonstrated improved overall survival (OS) compared to IMRT across multiple time points: 1-year OS (HR = 0.43, p = 0.02), 2-year OS (HR = 0.44, p < 0.0001), and 5-year OS (HR = 0.78, p = 0.004). In terms of disease-free survival (DFS), PT also showed improved outcomes at 2-year DFS (HR = 0.65, p = 0.03) and 5-year DFS (HR = 0.81, p = 0.03). Proton therapy demonstrated superior overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and better local control rate (LCR) compared to IMRT. The data also showed better safety outcomes in PT patients, particularly when involving grade 2 acute toxicity events.

Global prevalence and correlates of mpox vaccine acceptance and uptake: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundVaccination has been recommended as one of the most potent ways of controlling the mpox (formerly, monkeypox) outbreak, particularly among high-risk groups. Here, we evaluated the prevalence of mpox vaccine acceptance and uptake globally.MethodsWe searched multiple databases for peer-reviewed studies published in English from May 2022 to 25th November 2023 that evaluated mpox vaccine acceptance and/or uptake. We fit a random-effects model meta-analysis to calculate the pooled mpox vaccine acceptance and uptake rates, with their 95% confidence intervals (CI) across population outcomes. We performed subgroup analyses among the six World Health Organization (WHO) regions (Africa [AFR], Region of the Americas [AMR], South-East Asia Region [SEAR], European Region [EUR], Eastern Mediterranean Region [EMR], and the Western Pacific Region [WPR]), as well as among select population subgroups.ResultsOf the 2531 studies screened, 61 studies, with a cumulative sample size of 263,857 participants from 87 countries were eligible for inclusion. The overall vaccine acceptance and uptake rates were 59.7% and 30.9% globally. Acceptance and uptake rates among the LGBTQI+ community were 73.6% vs 39.8% globally, 60.9% vs. 37.1% in AMR, 80.9% vs. 50.0% in EUR, and 75.2% vs. 33.5% in WPR. Among PLHIV, vaccine acceptance and uptake rates were 66.4% vs. 35.7% globally, 64.0% vs. 33.9% in AMR, 65.1% vs. 27.0% in EUR, and 69.5% vs. 46.6% in WPR. Among healthcare workers, vaccination intention was 51.0% globally.ConclusionsTailored interventions are needed to bolster confidence in the mpox vaccine, maximize vaccine uptake, and increase vaccine access to close the gaps between acceptance and uptake especially among key populations residing in regions with low rates of acceptance and uptake.

P-767 Preterm birth in singleton pregnancies conceived by in-vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a systematic review with umbrella meta-analysis

Abstract Study question What is the risk level and potential etiology of preterm birth (PTB) in singleton pregnancies from in-vitro fertilization (IVF) or intra-cytoplasmic injection (ICSI)? Summary answer Singleton pregnancies from IVF/ICSI have, on average, double the risk of PTB compared to natural conceptions, with a higher risk for iatrogenic than spontaneous PTB. What is known already IVF/ICSI pregnancies are associated with a higher PTB risk, with a predominant effect mediated by the effect of multiples and a poor understanding of underlying etiology, particularly in singletons. According to the European IVF Monitoring Consortium (EIM) for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE), about 16% of singleton conceived through IVF/ICSI were born preterm in 2019. Considering the global a shift towards single embryo transfers (ETs), it becomes crucial to precisely determine and convey the PTB risk specific to singleton pregnancies conceived through IVF/ICSI, collecting all available evidence on supposed PTB etiology. Study design, size, duration A comprehensive search in major online databases was conducted up to December 31, 2023. Eligible studies were systematic reviews with quantitative data. The primary aim was to quantify PTB risk in singletons conceived by IVF/ICSI compared to natural pregnancies. Secondary objectives included assessing very preterm birth (VPTB) risk and exploring PTB’s etiology, phenotype, and initiation. PTB and VPTB were defined by the World Health Organization as delivery before 37 or 32 weeks, respectively. Participants/materials, setting, methods Random-effects meta-analysis models were used for pooling effect measures. Estimates were presented as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Information available on etiology, phenotype, initiation of PTB and relevant moderators was extracted and employed for subgroup analyses. The extent of overlap in the original studies was measured using the Corrected Covered Area (CCA) assessment. The quality of the included reviews was evaluated with the AMSTAR 2 tool and quality of evidence by GRADE. Main results and the role of chance Twelve meta-analyses with a total of 16,522,917 pregnancies were included. IVF/ICSI singletons showed a significantly higher risk of PTB compared to natural conception (PTB ˂37 weeks: OR: 1.72, 95% CI: 1.57-1.89). The pooled risk estimate was higher for births below 32 weeks (VPTB &amp;lt;32 weeks: OR: 2.19, 95%CI: 1.82-2.64). Influential analysis reinforced the strength of this association. Subgroup analyses investigating supposed etiology revealed a comparable risk magnitude for spontaneous PTB (OR 1.79, 95% CI:1.56-2.04) and a greater risk for iatrogenic PTB (OR: 2.28, 95%CI: 1.72–3.02). PTB risk was consistent in the subgroup of conventional IVF (OR: 1.95, 95% CI: 1.76-2.15) and higher in the subgroup of fresh-only ETs (OR: 1.79, 95% CI: 1.55-2.07) compared to frozen-thawed ETs (OR: 1.39, 95%CI: 1.34-1.43). CCA assessment showed minimal study overlap (13%). The quality of the evidence by GRADE assessment was judged as low to very low. Limitations, reasons for caution The methodological quality of the included reviews, as rated by AMSTAR 2, was judged as low to very low. Most included studies lacked granular data on IVF/ICSI indications and on specific PTB etiology, phenotypes, or initiation. Wider implications of the findings The risk of PTB is about double in IVF/ICSI singleton pregnancies compared to naturally conceived, with paucity of available data on PTB aetiology, phenotype, or initiation. The greater risk increase involves iatrogenic PTB from fresh ET and VPTB, likely due to placental aetiology. Trial registration number PROSPERO ID: CRD42023411418

Outpatient vs inpatient management of preterm prelabor rupture of membranes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

To compare neonatal, obstetrical, and maternal outcomes associated with outpatient vs inpatient management of pregnancies with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PPROM). A search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Database and Central Register from January 1, 1990 to July 31, 2023 identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies comparing outpatient with inpatient management for pregnant persons diagnosed with PPROM before 37 weeks' gestation. No language restriction was applied. We applied a random effects model for meta-analysis. Trustworthiness was assessed using recently published guidance and Risk of bias using the RoB 2.0 tool for RCTs and ROBINS-I tool for cohort studies. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) approach was used to assess the certainty of evidence (COE). Outcomes of interest included perinatal mortality, neonatal morbidities, latency and gestational age at delivery, and maternal morbidities. RCTs and cohort studies were analyzed separately. This study was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviewsr: CRD42022295275. From 2825 records, two RCTs and 10 cohort studies involving 1876 patients were included in the review and meta-analysis. Outpatient management protocols varied but generally included brief initial hospitalization, strict eligibility criteria, and surveillance with laboratory and ultrasound investigations. Outpatient management showed lower rates of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (cohort: RR 0.63 [0.52-0.77, very low COE]), longer latency to delivery (RCT: MD 7.43 days [1.14-13.72 days, moderate COE], cohort: MD 8.78 days [2.29-15.26 days, low COE]), higher gestational age at birth (cohort: MD 7.70 days [2.02-13.38 days, low COE]), lower rates of Apgar scores <7 at 5 min of life (cohort: RR 0.66 [0.50-0.89, very low COE]), and lower rates of histological chorioamnionitis (cohort: RR 0.74 [0.62-0.89, low COE]) without increased risks of adverse neonatal, obstetrical, or maternal outcomes. Meta-analysis of data from RCTs and cohort studies with very low-to-moderate certainty of evidence indicates that further high-quality research is needed to evaluate the safety and potential benefits of outpatient management for selected PPROM cases, given the moderate-to-high risk of bias in the included studies.

Developmental defects of enamel in childhood cancer survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

The present systematic review and meta-analysis (Prospero registration number: CRD42023472016) aims to assess the prevalence of developmental defects of enamel (DDEs), qualitatively and/or quantitatively, in childhood cancer survivors (CCS) and evaluate, when possible, these data in comparison with those found in healthy children. Three electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus) were searched from January 2003 to January 2024 for studies reporting on DDEs in children with a mean age not exceeding 16 years at the time of the study who underwent antineoplastic therapy. The ROBINS-I and the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) tools were used to assess the risk of bias. Included studies with comparable outcomes underwent random effects models meta-analysis using Stata®18. CCS showed a higher prevalence of DDEs, both qualitative and quantitative, compared to healthy children. The meta- analysis showed higher odds of developing qualitative defects over quantitative defects in CCS. Conclusions regarding the association between the type of therapy administered, age of therapy initiation, and prevalence of DDEs could not be drawn due to insufficient data. A lack of a standardized method of detecting enamel defects posed a challenge in the qualitative and quantitative analysis.

What CT Findings are Predictive of Post-Traumatic Enophthalmos in Orbital Fractures?

Enophthalmos is a surgical indication for orbital fracture repair. However, guidelines to predict enophthalmos in orbital fractures are ambiguous. We systematically reviewed the existing literature on utilizing CT findings to establish objective metrics to predict enophthalmos in asymptomatic patients during initial trauma work-up. PRISMA guidelines were followed. PubMed and Embase were used to identify studies of interest. The Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool was used for risk of bias assessment. Random effects model meta-analyses of orbital volume change and fracture area values were completed. Regression analyses were performed to determine thresholds that predicted 2 mm enophthalmos. Of the initial 2236 abstracts, 36 met inclusion criteria. Thirty retrospective studies evaluated a total of 2851 patients and 6 prospective studies evaluated 211 patients. All 36 studies had predominantly low risk of bias. Predictors of enophthalmos assessed were orbital volume change (21 papers), fracture surface area (13 papers), inferior rectus muscle (IRM) displacements (7 papers), and fracture location (4 papers). Studies reporting on orbital volume change offered values ranging from 0.69 to 4.26 cm3. Fracture area predictor values ranged from 1.50 to 3.38 cm2. Meta-analyses confirmed the validity of both predictors. Pooled regression analyses demonstrated that 3.33 cm3 of orbital volume increase or fracture area of 3.12 cm2 were predictors of 2 mm enophthalmos. Both orbital volume change and fracture area measured on CT scan are good predictors of late post-traumatic enophthalmos. Pooled data indicates 3.12 cm2 of fracture area or 3.33 cm3 of orbital volume increase are predictive of enophthalmos.

Cardiac complications (arrhythmias and heart failure) in patients with ischemic stroke: A meta-analysis.

In patients with ischemic stroke (pwIS), cardiac complications have been observed in observational studies. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the arrhythmias and heart failure in pwIS. Up until September 2023, we searched for case-control, cross-sectional, or cohort studies in 4 databases. For case-control/cross-sectional studies, odds ratios (OR) were determined using a random-effects model meta-analysis, while hazard ratios (HR) were calculated for cohort studies, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled in the meta-analysis. In the meta-analysis, we incorporated 5 studies: 2 cohort studies, 2 case-control studies, and 1 cross-sectional study. In all, 81,181 controls and 25,544 pwIS were included in this investigation. The combined OR for case-control studies of arrhythmias was estimated to be 1.86 (95% CI: 0.70-4.94, P = .21), HR for cohort studies of arrhythmias to be 4.2 (95% CI: 1.49-12.01, P < .05), and for cohort studies of heart failure to be 2.9 (95% CI: 2.65-3.18, P < .05), suggesting that pwIS may be more likely to experience cardiac complications. Our results revealed that there is a comparatively higher risk of cardiac complications in pwIS; however, more research is needed to evaluate the risk of cardiac complications in pwIS.

The Impact of Chlorhexidine as an Endodontic Irrigant/Medicament on Post-Obturation Pain in Patients Following Endodontic Therapy: A Preliminary Bayesian Meta-Analysis.

To assess the overall impact of chlorhexidine, when used as an endodontic irrigant/medicament, on post-obturation pain following endodontic treatment by the application of Bayes methods of meta-analysis. This study aimed to combine recently documented evidence using rigorous and specific search criteria. The available data were analyzed using Bayesian methods, which have the advantage of accounting for uncertainties in estimates. This is in contrast to commonly used frequentist meta-analysis methods, which are not able to model uncertainties as effectively, particularly when there is heterogeneity present. A preliminary search was conducted in the Pubmed, Cochrane, and Scielo databases using appropriate keywords. The search aimed to identify human randomized clinical studies that evaluated post-operative endodontic pain and involved the use of chlorhexidine as an endodontic irrigant or medicament. The preliminary Bayesian meta-analysis produced a more accurate estimate compared to a frequentist random effect meta-analysis model, with a narrower credible interval. The frequentist model demonstrated a detrimental impact of chlorhexidine on post-obturation pain, while the Bayesian model indicated a somewhat favorable effect of chlorhexidine on post-obturation pain. Based on the scope of this investigation, it can be inferred that a Bayesian random effects meta-analysis model demonstrated a somewhat favorable impact of chlorhexidine on post-endodontic pain, which carries significant therapeutic significance.

Robust inference methods for meta-analysis involving influential outlying studies.

Meta-analysis is an essential tool to comprehensively synthesize and quantitatively evaluate results of multiple clinical studies in evidence-based medicine. In many meta-analyses, the characteristics of some studies might markedly differ from those of the others, and these outlying studies can generate biases and potentially yield misleading results. In this article, we provide effective robust statistical inference methods using generalized likelihoods based on the density power divergence. The robust inference methods are designed to adjust the influences of outliers through the use of modified estimating equations based on a robust criterion, even when multiple and serious influential outliers are present. We provide the robust estimators, statistical tests, and confidence intervals via the generalized likelihoods for the fixed-effect and random-effects models of meta-analysis. We also assess the contribution rates of individual studies to the robust overall estimators that indicate how the influences of outlying studies are adjusted. Through simulations and applications to two recently published systematic reviews, we demonstrate that the overall conclusions and interpretations of meta-analyses can be markedly changed if the robust inference methods are applied and that only the conventional inference methods might produce misleading evidence. These methods would be recommended to be used at least as a sensitivity analysis method in the practice of meta-analysis. We have also developed an R package, robustmeta, that implements the robust inference methods.

Quantitative evaluation of the efficacy and safety profiles of two types of targeted inhibitors combined with endocrine therapy in ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer.

The aim of this study was to quantitatively compare the efficacy and safety of CDK4/6 inhibitors and PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors for ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer. A parametric survival function was used to analyze the time course of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The objective response rate (ORR) and the incidence of any grade and grade 3-4 adverse events were summarized using the random-effects model of a single-arm meta-analysis. This study included 44 arms from 48 publications, with a total sample size of 7881 patients. Our study revealed that CDK4/6 inhibitors had a median OS of 40.7 months, a median PFS of 14.8 months, and an ORR of 40%, whereas PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors had a median OS of 29.8 months, a median PFS of 8.3 months, and an ORR of 20%. Additionally, this study also found that the proportion of patients with visceral metastases and specific endocrine therapy used in combination significantly impact OS and PFS. In terms of adverse events, CDK4/6 inhibitors exhibited a relatively high incidence of hematological adverse events. Our study provides solid quantitative evidence for the first-line recommendation of CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with endocrine therapy for ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer in clinical guidelines.

Prostate Cancer Incidence and Mortality Linked to Metalworking Fluid Exposure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Introduction: Prostate cancer is a significant health concern, and occupational exposures, including metalworking fluid (MWF) exposure, have been implicated as potential risk factors. This protocol outlines a systematic review and meta-analysis methodology to investigate the association between MWF exposure and prostate cancer risk among male workers. Methods: Eligible studies include cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies published until between 1990 and 2023 focusing on MWF exposure and prostate cancer risk in male workers. Two independent reviewers will screen studies, extract data using a standardized form, conduct a meta-analysis using random-effects models, and assess study quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Heterogeneity will be assessed, and sensitivity analyses will be conducted to explore sources of bias. Results: Anticipated outcomes include a comprehensive list of eligible studies, a synthesized analysis using random-effects meta-analysis models to estimate the association between MWF exposure and prostate cancer risk, and a quality assessment report of included studies. Subgroup analyses based on MWF type, exposure duration, and study design will be performed to explore heterogeneity. Conclusion: This systematic review and meta-analysis protocol aim to provide robust evidence on the association between MWF exposure and prostate cancer risk among male workers. The anticipated findings will have implications for occupational health practices and may guide future research and intervention strategies.

Quality of Sleep and Its Determinants Among People with Diabetes Mellitus in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

ABSTRACT Background Poor sleep quality is a serious concern among diabetes mellitus patients, adversely affecting glycemic management and the prognosis of diabetic patients. Therefore, the main aim of this study was to estimate the overall pooled prevalence of poor sleep quality and its associated factors among diabetic patients in Sub-Saharan Africa. Methods Several search databases were employed to retrieve the eligible studies. A standardized data extraction format was used to extract the data, and the analysis was conducted using STATA version 14. To determine heterogeneity, the I2 test was conducted, and both the funnel plot and Egger’s regression test were used to assess the publication bias. A random effects model meta-analysis was performed to estimate the overall prevalence and associated factors of poor sleep quality. Results In the current meta-analysis, a total of 11 studies with 3,766 study participants were included. The overall pooled prevalence of poor sleep quality among diabetic patients was 53.22% (95% CI: 36.26, 70.19). Poor sleep quality was significantly associated with longer duration of diabetes (OR = 2.94, 95% CI: 1.85, 4.67), poor glycemic control (OR = 2.24, 95% CI: 1.51, 3.32), depression (OR = 4.09, 95% CI: 2.07, 8.05) and comorbidity (OR = 1.94, 95% CI: 1.31, 2.88). Conclusion In this study, more than half of diabetic patients in Sub-Saharan Africa had poor sleep quality. Therefore, healthcare providers should give more attention to sleep disorders when screening diabetic patients to improve their poor sleep quality.

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients at Four or More Years

BackgroundTranscatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is accepted as an alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in patients with severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis. Prior studies have shown that TAVR has comparable or superior outcomes to SAVR in intermediate and high-risk patients. However, there is paucity of data about outcome of TAVR vs SAVR in low-surgical-risk patients evaluated at 4 or more years post-procedure. MethodsA systematic review of all published randomized controlled trials comparing TAVR and SAVR in low-risk patients was completed. A random-effects model meta-analysis was performed to study major outcomes, including all-cause mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction, and aortic valve reintervention. ResultsThree randomized trials comprising 2644 patients (1371 TAVR and 1273 SAVR) with a mean age of 74.3 ± 5.8 years were included in this analysis. There was no significant difference in all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction, or aortic valve reintervention between the TAVR and SAVR groups at long-term follow-up. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement was associated with higher rate of pacemaker implantation, whereas SAVR was associated with more atrial fibrillation. ConclusionsAt 4 or more years of follow-up, TAVR is safe and has comparable outcomes to SAVR in low-surgical-risk patients. Possibility of TAVR and its risks and benefits should be discussed with low-surgical-risk patients.

The Prevalence of Mild Cognitive Impairment in China: Evidence from a Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of 393,525 Adults.

This study aims to precisely determine the prevalence of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in China, acknowledging its significance as a preclinical stage of dementia and a potential "intervention window." The acceleration of the aging process in China underscores the urgency of this research. A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CNKI, WFD, VIP, and CBM databases from their inception until March 1, 2023. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) methodology checklist guided our quality assessment. A random-effects model meta-analysis was employed to synthesize the pooled prevalence data of MCI in China. Our analysis encompassed 139 studies, incorporating data from 393,525 individuals aged 40 years and above. The studies were predominantly rated as moderate-to-high quality. The overall prevalence of MCI was determined to be 19.6% (95% CI: 17.7-21.6%). Subgroup analyses indicated variations in prevalence: 20.8% (95% CI: 18.9-22.7%) for P-MCI compared to 16.2% (95% CI: 11.7-20.7%) for DSM criteria. Geographically, prevalence in Southern China (21.0%, 95% CI: 18.1-23.9%) exceeded that in Northern China (17.6%, 95% CI: 15.9-19.4%). Notably, prevalence in hospitals (61.7%, 95% CI: 27.8-95.7%) was significantly higher than in nursing homes (16.1%, 95% CI: 14.3-17.9%) and communities (25.3%, 95% CI: 17.4-33.2%), especially after the COVID-19 outbreak. The study confirms a 19.6% prevalence rate of MCI in China, influenced by factors such as sample sources, beginning year of survey, and regional differences. It highlights the need for targeted screening and resource allocation to subpopulations at risk, aiming to prevent the progression to dementia.

Characteristics of Nontyphoid Salmonella Isolated from Human, Environmental, Animal, and Food Samples in Burkina Faso: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Salmonella is one of the world's leading causes of zoonotic and foodborne illnesses. Recently, antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has become one of the most critical challenges to public health and food safety. Herein, we employed a meta-analysis to determine the pooled prevalence and spatiotemporal distribution of serovars and antimicrobial resistance in NTS in Burkina Faso. To find eligible articles, a comprehensive literature search of PubMed, African Journals Online, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, and the gray literature (university libraries) in Burkina was conducted for the period from 2008 to 2020. Studies meeting the inclusion criteria were selected and assessed for risk of bias. To assess the temporal and spatial relationships between serotypes and resistant strains from humans, animals, food, and the environment, a random-effects statistical model meta-analysis was carried out using the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Version 3.0 program. The NTS prevalence rates were 4.6% (95% CI: 3-7) and 20.1% (95% CI: 6.6-47.4) in humans and animals, respectively, and 16.8% (95% CI: 10.5-25.8) and 15.6% (95% CI: 8.2-27.5) in food and the environment, respectively. Most NTS serovars were S. Derby, reported both in food and animals, and S. Typhimurium, reported in humans, while S. Croft II, S. Jodpur II, and S. Kentucky were the most prevalent in the environment. NTS isolates were highly resistant to erythromycin, amoxicillin, cefixime, and cephalothin, with a pooled prevalence of multidrug resistance of 29% (95% CI: 14.5-49.5). The results of this review show a high diversity of Salmonella serotypes, as well as high antibiotic resistance in Salmonella isolates from animal, human, food, and environmental samples in Burkina, calling for a consolidated "One Health" approach to better understand the drivers of pathogen emergence, spread, and antimicrobial resistance, as well as the formulation of intervention measures needed to limit the risk associated with the disease.

Burden of Childhood Diarrhea and Its Associated Factors in Ethiopia: A Review of Observational Studies.

Objectives: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to: i) determine the pooled prevalence of acute diarrhea; and ii) synthesize and summarize current evidence on factors of acute diarrheal illnesses among under-five children in Ethiopia. Methods: A comprehensive systematic search was conducted in PubMed, SCOPUS, HINARI, Science Direct, Google Scholar, Global Index Medicus, Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), and the Cochrane Library. This systematic review and meta-analysis followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline. The methodological quality of each included article was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) quality assessment tool for cross-sectional and case-control studies. A random-effect meta-analysis model was used to estimate the pooled prevalence of diarrheal illnesses. Heterogeneity and publication bias were assessed using I2 test statistics and Egger's test, respectively. The statistical analysis was done using STATA™ software version 14. Results: Fifty-three studies covering over 27,458 under-five children who met the inclusion criteria were included. The pooled prevalence of diarrhea among under-five children in Ethiopia was found to be 20.8% (95% CI: 18.69-22.84, n = 44, I2 = 94.9%, p < 0.001). Our analysis revealed a higher prevalence of childhood diarrhea in age groups of 12-23 months 25.42% (95%CI: 21.50-29.35, I2 = 89.4%, p < 0.001). In general, the evidence suggests that diarrheal risk factors could include: i) child level determinants (child's age 0-23 months, not being vaccinated against rotavirus, lack of exclusive breastfeeding, and being an under-nourished child); ii) parental level determinants {mothers poor handwashing practices [pooled odds ratio (OR) = 3.05; 95% CI:2.08-4.54] and a history of maternal recent diarrhea (pooled OR = 3.19, 95%CI: 1.94-5.25)}; and iii) Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH) determinants [lack of toilet facility (pooled OR = 1.56, 95%CI: 1.05-2.33)], lack handwashing facility (pooled OR = 4.16, 95%CI: 2.49-6.95) and not treating drinking water (pooled OR = 2.28, 95% CI: 1.50-3.46). Conclusion: In Ethiopia, the prevalence of diarrhea among children under the age of five remains high and is still a public health problem. The contributing factors to acute diarrheal illnesses were child, parental, and WASH factors. A continued focus on improving access to WASH facilities, along with enhancing maternal hygiene behavior will accelerate reductions in diarrheal disease burden in Ethiopia.