You have accessJournal of UrologyGeneral & Epidemiological Trends & Socioeconomics: Quality of Life1 Apr 2012652 PREVALENCE AND CORRELATES OF URINARY INCONTINENCE AMONG OLDER, COMMUNITY-DWELLING CALIFORNIANS Aqsa Khan, Claudia Sevilla, Emily Dubina, Catherine Bresee, Karyn Eilber, and Jennifer Anger Aqsa KhanAqsa Khan Los Angeles, CA More articles by this author , Claudia SevillaClaudia Sevilla Los Angeles, CA More articles by this author , Emily DubinaEmily Dubina Los Angeles, CA More articles by this author , Catherine BreseeCatherine Bresee Los Angeles, CA More articles by this author , Karyn EilberKaryn Eilber Los Angeles, CA More articles by this author , and Jennifer AngerJennifer Anger Los Angeles, CA More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2012.02.732AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Understanding the prevalence and correlates of urinary incontinence (UI) becomes increasingly important as the aging population in the United States grows. UI among community-dwelling adults is associated with an increased risk of nursing home admissions and may be an important predictor of health in older, non-institutionalized adults. In this study we sought to determine the prevalence and correlates of UI among older, community-dwelling Californians by analyzing data from the California Health Interview Survey (CHIS). METHODS CHIS is a biennial, population-based random digit dialing telephone survey which began in 2001. The CHIS 2003 adult survey included one question for Californians aged 65 and older about UI: “In the past 30 days, have you been incontinent, that is unable to hold or control your urine more than once?” Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted for correlates of UI with respect to demographics, general health, comorbidities, and health behaviors. RESULTS 8,668 individuals aged 65 and older responded. Overall prevalence was 25.4% and 14.5% among females and males respectively. UI was significantly associated with poorer overall health, increased falls, decreased mobility, and other comorbities (see Table). Prevalence increased with age and female gender. After adjusting for other health factors there was no significant association found with level of education, household income, smoking status, or alcohol consumption. Correlate Unadjusted OR (p) 95% CI Adjusted OR (p) 95% CI Self-Described as Poor Health 6.38(<0.001) (4.71,8.37) 3.52(<0.001) (2.53,4.90) Fallen in Past 12 months 2.71(<0.001) (2.23,3.30) 1.75(<0.001) (1.42,2.17) Requires Assistance for Daily Activities 3.91(<0.001) (3.01,5.09) 1.97(<0.001) (1.48,2.63) Overweight/Obese 1.26(0.002) (1.09,1.46) 1.37(<0.001) (1.17,1.60) Heart Disease 1.63(<0.001) (1.39,1.91) 1.39(0.007) (1.07,1.54) Prostate Cancer 1.99(<0.001) (1.39,2.85) 1.53(0.031) (1.04,2.26) Current Hormone Replacement Therapy 1.46(0.001) (1.17,1.81) 1.79(<0.001) (1.43,2.23) CONCLUSIONS UI prevalence among men and women in California parallels that of other population−based studies. CHIS demonstrated that poor health, falls, and decreased mobility are strongly correlated with UI. CHIS data did not find a correlation between UI and smoking after adjusting for other health factors, a debated association in prior studies. © 2012 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 187Issue 4SApril 2012Page: e265-e266 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2012 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Aqsa Khan Los Angeles, CA More articles by this author Claudia Sevilla Los Angeles, CA More articles by this author Emily Dubina Los Angeles, CA More articles by this author Catherine Bresee Los Angeles, CA More articles by this author Karyn Eilber Los Angeles, CA More articles by this author Jennifer Anger Los Angeles, CA More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...