Ramsay Sedation Score Research Articles

Influence of Dexmedetomidine on Diaphragm Function and Postoperative Outcomes in ICU Patients with Mechanical Ventilation.

Objective To probe into the influence of dexmedetomidine (DEX) on diaphragm function and postoperative outcomes of mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). Methods 84 patients with mechanical ventilation (MV) in the ICU of our hospital were selected as the research participants, including 38 patients in the control group (CG) sedated with midazolam (MZ) and 46 patients in the research group (RG) with DEX sedation. Ramsay sedation score, visual analogue scale (VAS), and restlessness score (RS) were used to evaluate their state before sedation (T0), as well as 2 h (T1), 6 h (T2), and 24 h (T3) after sedation, and the alterations of mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) were recorded. Serum cortisol (Cor), adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), superoxide dismutase (SOD), malondialdehyde (MDA), interleukin- (IL-) 1β, IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) were measured before and 24 h after sedation. The end-inspiratory diaphragm thickness (DTei) and end-expiratory diaphragm thickness (DTee) were measured within 2 h after the initiation of MV and 5 min after the spontaneous breathing test (SBT), and the diaphragm thickening fraction (DTF) was calculated. Finally, the ventilator weaning, MV time, and the incidence of adverse reactions (ADs) of the two groups were counted. Results T0 and T3 witnessed no distinct difference in Ramsay, VAS, and RS scores between the two arms (P > 0.05), but at T1 and T2, RG had better sedation state and lower VAS and RS scores than CG (P < 0.05), with more stable vital signs (P < 0.05). After sedation, the contents of oxidative stress and inflammatory factors in RG were lower, while DTee, DTei, and DTF were higher, versus CG (P < 0.05). Moreover, RG presented higher success rate of first ventilator weaning, less MV time, and lower incidence of ADs than CG (P < 0.05). Conclusions DEX is effective in mechanically ventilated patients in the ICU, which can protect patients against diaphragm function damage, improve the success rate of ventilator weaning, and benefit the postoperative outcome, with excellent and rapid sedation effect and less stress damage to patients.

Effect of intraperitoneal instillation of dexmedetomidine or fentanyl as adjuvants to bupivacaine on fast tracking discharge criteria in patients undergoing ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomised double-blind control trial

BackgroundPostoperative analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy significantly affects the ambulation and discharge of the patient. This study compares fentanyl and dexmedetomidine as adjuvants to bupivacaine in intraperitoneal instillation after LC, in terms of their impact on ambulation, analgesic efficacy and recovery profile. Ninety patients were randomised into three groups with thirty patients in each group; group BF was administered 20 ml of 2 μg/kg fentanyl + 0.25% bupivacaine, group BD received 20 ml of 1μg/kg dexmedetomidine + 0.25% bupivacaine and group B received 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine only. After 8 h, Post-Anaesthesia Discharge Scoring System (PADS) scored for determining home readiness. Analgesic profile was assessed using Verbal Rating Scale and rescue analgesia requirement seen. Sedation was scored using Ramsay sedation scoring.ResultsGroup B had significantly higher VRS and rescue analgesia requirements whilst groups BF and BD had a similar analgesic profile. Ramsay sedation scores were significantly higher in group BD when compared to groups BF and B. However, the PADS score remained comparable in all three groups (P = 0.113). The trial was retrospectively registered with the clinical trial registry of India CTRI/2019/07/020466.ConclusionIntraperitoneal instillation of bupivacaine in combination with dexmedetomidine or fentanyl significantly reduces postoperative pain scores in comparison to bupivacaine alone, in patients undergoing ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy. However, fentanyl may be preferred over dexmedetomidine, because it causes less sedation and achieves a better PADS score.

Acomparative Study between Epidural Analgesia of Levobupivacaine with Fentanyl versus Dexmedetomidine for knee replacement surgeries

Abstract Background The use of epidural analgesia for the management of postoperative pain has evolved as a critical component of multimodal approach to achieve the goal of adequate analgesia with improved outcome. Epidural analgesia offers superior postoperative pain relief compared with systemic opioids. In addition to improved patient outcome. Objective To compare the effect of dexmedetomidine and fentanyl as an adjuvant to epidural levobupivacaine in knee replacement surgeries regarding duration of action and the analgesic potency of both drugs. Patients and Methods This prospective double blinded randomized clinical trial study was conducted in Maadi Military and Ain Shams University Hospitals after approval of the anesthesia department and the local ethics and research committee over 6 months and after obtaining a written informed consent. Sixty patients underwent knee replacement surgeries were included in the study their ages range between 21 and 60 years old and classified as ASA I and II. The patients were randomly divided using computer generated randomization into two groups 30 patients in each (n = 30). Results As regards sedation score intraoperative and postoperative, in the present study, we found that Ramsay sedation score was significantly higher in group ‘BD’ when compared to group ‘BF’ intraoperative and postoperative. This finding may be attributed to the sedative properties of dexmedetomidine that is far superior to fentanyl acting by dose-dependent decrease in activity of noradrenergic neurons in the brain stem via post-synaptic receptor-mediated inhibition. This increases gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) neurone activity, which mediates central sedative effects. Conclusion Epidural levobupivacaine with dexmedetomidine provided better sedation, adequate surgical anesthesia with prolonged postoperative analgesia for lower limb surgeries. Both adjuvants reduced the epidural dose of levobupivacaine and potentiated its efficacy.

Effects of Transcutaneous Electrical Acupoint Stimulation on Stress Response during Intubation and Extubation in Patients Undergoing Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial.

Objective The study aimed to evaluate the effect of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS) on the stress response during intubation and extubation in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Methods 122 patients undergoing VATS lobectomy were randomly divided into two groups: the TEAS group (n = 62) and the control group (n = 60). Patients in the TEAS group underwent electroacupuncture stimulation of bilateral Neiguan (PC6), Hegu (L14), Lieque (LU7), and Chize (LU5) acupoints from 30 min before anesthesia to the end of surgery. The patients in the control group did not undergo stimulation. The primary endpoints were the hemodynamic parameters and plasma concentrations of epinephrine, norepinephrine, and cortisol. The secondary endpoints were the consumption of remifentanil and propofol, Ramsay sedation score and arousal time, extubation quality score, and postoperative complications. Results The hemodynamic variables and plasma concentrations of epinephrine, norepinephrine, and cortisol during intubation and extubation were lower in the TEAS group at T1, T3, and T4 compared with the control group. TEAS led to a reduction in the consumption of remifentanil (P < 0.01), as well as a reduction in the incidence of postoperative complications. The extubation quality score was lower (P < 0.01) while the Ramsay sedation score was higher (P < 0.01) in the TEAS group than in the control group. However, the arousal time and consumption of propofol were not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusion TEAS can maintain hemodynamic stability, reduce the stress response during intubation and extubation, improve the quality of anesthesia recovery, and decrease the incidence of postoperative complications in patients undergoing VATS.

Effect of B-ultrasound-guided nerve block on nerve block on analgesia and sedation in patients with acute cholecystitis undergoing puncture and drainage

To investigate the effect of B-ultrasound-guided nerve block on analgesia and sedation in patients with acute cholecystitis undergoing puncture and drainage. Methods 96 patients with acute cholecystitis who underwent puncture and drainage from May 2018 to November 2020 were randomly divided into control group and observation group by random number table method, with 48 cases in each group. The patients in the control group were anesthetized by local infiltration. The patients in the observation group were anesthetized by B-ultrasound-guided nerve block. Heart rate, blood pressure, analgesia score, sedation score, and oxidative stress level were compared between the two groups. Results At the time of puncture (T2), heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) in the two groups were significantly lower than those before operation (T1) (P&lt;0.05); at the end of operation (T3), HR and MAP in the control group were significantly higher than those at T1 (P&lt;0.05); at T2, HR and MAP in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P&lt;0.05); at T3, HR and MAP in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P&lt;0.05). AtT2 and T3, Ramsay sedation score in both groups was significantly lower than that at T1 (P&lt;0.05), while Ramsay score in the observation group was significantly higher than that in control group (P&lt;0.05); atT2 and T3, visual analog scale (VAS) pain score in both groups was significantly higher than that at T1 (P&lt;0.05), while VAS score in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P&lt;0.05). After operation, the levels of serum malondialdehyde (MDA) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) in the two groups were significantly higher than those before operation (P&lt;0.05), and the levels of serum total antioxidant capacity (T-AOC) were significantly lower than those before operation (P&lt;0.05); after operation, the levels of serum SOD and T-AOC in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P&lt;0.05), and the levels of MDA in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P&gt;0.05). Conclusion B-ultrasound-guided nerve block anesthesia can maintain the stable hemodynamic index of patients with acute cholecystitis undergoing puncture and drainage therapy, improve the analgesic and sedative effect and reduce the oxidative stress response of the body.

Dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to bupivacaine in ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgeries

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was the assessment of the analgesic and hemodynamic implications of dexmedetomidine used as an additive to bupivacaine in ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane (SAP) block for patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgeries (VATS ) under general anesthesia.ResultsThe hemodynamic stability was maintained perioperatively with no significant difference of MBP and HR recordings between the two study groups (P > 0.05). The time to 1st postoperative analgesic demand was significantly longer in group BD than in group B (P < 0.05). The postoperative total nalbuphine and rescue ketorolac requirements were significantly lower in group BD than in group B (P < 0.05). The VAS scores were significantly lower in group BD at 8th and 12th h postoperatively than in group B, with no significant difference at 0–6 h and 18–24 h postoperatively (P > 0.05). Ramsay sedation scores were significantly higher in the group BD than in group B in the initial 1st h after surgery (P < 0.05) with no significant difference at the subsequent postoperative recordings (P > 0.05).ConclusionUsing dexmedetomidine (0.5 μg/kg) as an additive to bupivacaine for SAP block prolongs the duration of postoperative analgesia and reduces the postoperative analgesic requirements in the 1st 24 h after VATS without any significant side effects.

Comparison of Dexmedetomidine, midazolam and propofol for sedation of post operative patients on mechanical ventilation- An open label randomised control trial

Mechanical ventilation is a life-sustaining therapy for the treatment of patients with acute respiratory failure. One of the key factors for good clinical practice in the ICU is to provide adequate sedation. An ideal sedative should provide a rapid onset, a rapid recovery. On this background the present study is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine, propofol and midazolam for sedating property, hemodynamic effects and analgesic. It is an open label, single blinded randomized control trial. Census sampling is planned for recruitment which will have maximum power and type I error &amp;#60;0.05.This study is carried out in 39 adult patients with Glasgow coma scale score of 9-15, Patients were divided randomly into three groups of 13 each. Group M patients received IV inj. Midazolam loading dose 0.15mg/kg followed by maintenance dose of 0.02-0.1mg/kg/hour. Group P patients received intravenous inj. Propofol loading dose of 1.5mg/kg followed by continuous infusion of 1-6 mg/kg/hr. Group D patients received intravenous inj. Dexmedetomidine loading dose of 1μg/kg followed by maintenance dose of 0.2-0.5 μg/kg/hr of continuous infusion by infusion pump. Desired depth of sedation was assessed by Ramsay Sedation Score. The difference in mean age and ASA status among the three groups are not statistically significant. There is no statistical significance of sex &amp; GCS status of the patients of these three groups. In our study, difference of mean HR at different time interval was not statistically significant. But the fall in Heart Rate is more in Group D and Group M than in Group P. The mean heart rate is less in Group D compared to Group M and Group P after 45 minutes of infusion. We found that difference of mean SBP &amp; DBP at different time interval was not statistically significant. In overall Dexmedetomidine Group showed stable RSS score throughout the time interval (between RSS 2 to 3). One patient in Dexmedetomidine group developed bradycardia. Mean opioid at 24th hour was significantly higher in group M than other group and difference was statistically significant and post sedation delirium was not statistically significant. In this study we found that difference of mean hemodynamic parameters at different time interval in three drugs was not statistically significant. The Heart Rate remain lower in Dexmedetomidine Group compared to Midazolam and Propofol Group after 45 minutes of infusion.

EFFECT OF USING FENTANYL AS AN ADDITIVE WITH THE LOCAL ANAESTHESTIC MIXTURE IN PERIBULBAR BLOCK FOR CATARACT SURGERIESA PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED CONTROL STUDY

INTRODUCTION: Cataract surgery is one of the most commonly performed surgery in the elderly patients. Regional anesthesia is safe, reliable, provide adequate akinesia and analgesia of the eye, a good postoperative pain relief and a shorter hospital stay. The various regional anesthetic techniques used in ophthalmic surgeries are peribulbar block, retrobulbar block, sub tenon's block, subconjunctival block and topical corneo-conjunctival anesthesia. Due to its safer approach, the peribulbar block is most commonly. Addition of an opioid like fentanyl to the anesthetic preparation will provide a faster onset of lid and globe akinesia, faster onset of sensory blockade, increase the duration of analgesia and reduce the need for rescue analgesia postoperatively. AIM OF THE STUDY: To evaluate the effect of addition of fentanyl to the local anesthetic mixture in peribulbar block in cataract surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was done in the Department of Anesthesiology in collaboration with the Department of Ophthalmology in Kanyakumari Government Medical College from January 2019 to December 2019. Patient posted for cataract surgery were allocated into two groups by randomization (30 each). Group S – 4ml of 2% lignocaine with adrenaline premixed with hyaluronidase + 1ml of 0.5% Bupivacaine + 0.5ml normal saline. Group F – 4ml of 2% lignocaine with adrenaline premixed with hyaluronidase + 1ml of 0.5% Bupivacaine + 25 mcg Fentanyl (0.5 ml). The Parameters related to the study such as Onset of lid akinesia, Onset of globe akinesia, Onset of sensory blockade, Duration of analgesia by VAS score, Level of sedation by Ramsay sedation score, vital parameters – SpO , pulse rate, respiratory rate, blood pressure and any 2 Complications were recorded. RESULTS: We found that the demographic parameters were comparable and statistically insignicant. The preoperative hemodynamic parameters like the systolic and diastolic blood pressure, pulse rate, SpO2, respiratory rate were statistically insignicant and comparable. The mean onset of lid akinesia was 5.8 ± 1.76 mins and 3.13 ± 1.25 mins in Group S and Group F respectively. The mean onset of globe akinesia was found to be 7.46 ± 2.22 mins and 4.2 ± 1.60 mins in Group S and Group F respectively. The mean onset of sensory blockade was 6.8 ± 1.24 mins and 4.93 ± 1.63 mins in Group S and Groups F respectively. Thus the onset of globe and lid akinesia and the onset of sensory blockade was faster in Group F compared to Group S. The mean VAS scores were statistically signicant (P&lt;0.001) between both the groups at 1 hour, 1.5 hour, 2 hour, 4 hour, 6 hour postoperatively and it was found that Group F has a lower VAS score when compared with Group S. The VAS score at 8 hour and 10 hours postoperatively were statistically insignicant (p&gt;0.05) in both the groups. The mean duration of analgesia was 4.56 ± 1.65 hours in Group S and 7.63 ± 2.55 hours in Group F and was found to be statistically signicant(P&lt;0.001). CONCLUSION: Based on this study, we can conclude that there is a faster onset in the lid akinesia, globe akinesia, in the onset of sensory blockade and a substantial increase in the duration of analgesia when fentanyl is used as an additive along with the local anesthetic mixture in peribulbar block for cataract surgery

The Effect of Oxycodone on Post-operative Pain and Inflammatory Cytokine Release in Elderly Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Gastrectomy.

Background: To evaluate the effect of oxycodone on post-operative pain and inflammation in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic gastrectomy.Methods: Sixty patients who were of both sexes, American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA-PS) Class I or II, over 65 years of age and undergoing an elective laparoscopic radical gastrectomy were randomly divided into two groups: an oxycodone group (Group O) including 20 males and 10 females and a sufentanil group (Group S) including 21 males and 9 females. The post-operative analgesia regimen was as follows: 40 mg of parecoxib sodium and 0.1 mg/kg of oxycodone was intravenously injected into Group O before the abdomen closure, while 40 mg of parecoxib sodium and 0.1 μg/kg of sufentanil was injected intravenously into Group S. Both groups were infiltrated with 20 ml of 1% ropivacaine at the end of the operation. The level of serum IL-6 and IL-10 were assayed immediately at the following timepoints: at the conclusion of surgery (T1), 1 h (T2), 6 h (T3), and 24 h (T4) after the completion of the surgery. The numerical rating scale (NRS), the Ramsay sedation score, analgesic-related adverse events, post-operative pulmonary inflammation events and the post-operative stay were recorded.Results: Compared with Group S, the serum IL-6 concentrations of Group O decreased at T3 and T4, while the serum IL-10 concentrations increased (P < 0.05). In Group O, the serum IL-6 concentrations at T3 and T4 were lower than those at T1 (P < 0.05). The incidence of post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and pulmonary inflammation in Group O was lower than that in Group S (P < 0.05). At each time point, the NRS of visceral pain in Group O was lower than that in Group S. At 6 and 24 h after extubation, the NRS of incision pain in Group O was lower than that in Group S (P < 0.05).Conclusion: Oxycodone can regulate the level of inflammatory cytokines and reduce post-operative inflammatory response.

Investigation of the effects of propofol/ketamine versus propofol/fentanyl on nausea- vomiting administered for sedation in children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging: a prospective randomized double-blinded study

Background/aim In this study, we aimed to compare the effects of propofol-ketamine and propofol-fentanyl sedations on post-procedure nausea-vomiting in children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).Materials and methodsThis study included 100 pediatric patients (2–10 years old) who had propofol-ketamine and propofol-fentanyl for sedation to undergo MRI. The patients were divided into two groups, and sedation was performed through propofol-ketamine (Group K; n = 50) or propofol-fentanyl (Group F; n = 50). For sedation induction, intravenous (IV) bolus of 1.2 mg/kg propofol and 1 mg/kg ketamine were administered in Group K, IV bolus of 1.2 mg/kg propofol, and 1 µg/kg fentanyl in Group F. All patients received 0.5 mg/kg IV bolus propofol in additional doses when the Ramsay Sedation Score (RSS) was below 4 for maintenance. Perioperative heart rate, systolic arterial pressure, peripheral oxygen saturation, respiratory rate, and nausea-vomiting scores were recorded for each patient.Results There was no difference between the groups in terms of nausea incidences at the 1st hour. However, the rate of vomiting was significantly higher in Group K.ConclusionIn our study, we showed that the vomiting rate was higher in the 1st hour in Group K compared to Group F.

A Randomised Controlled Trial to Assess the Analgesic Efficacy of Reduced Dose 0.2% Ropivacaine-Dexmedetomidine Combination Compared to Standard 0.375% Ropivacaine in USG Guided TAP Block for Paediatric Hernia Repair.

Paediatric pain management has remained understated practice over a period of time. Recently ultrasound-guided (USG) guided techniques are gaining popularity for perioperative analgesia, especially in the paediatric population. So, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of reduced dose ropivacaine-dexmedetomidine combination compared to standard 0.375% ropivacaine in USG guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block. Sixty children of either sex, aged 2-10 years, posted for elective open herniotomy under general anaesthesia were randomly divided into two groups of 30 patients each. Group RD received 0.2% ropivacaine with dexmedetomidine 1 mg kg 1 while group R received 0.375% ropivacaine at 0.5mL kg 1. Meantime to first rescue and total analgesics, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale (CHEOPS) and Ramsay sedation score, haemodynamic parameters and adverse effects were noted. Time to first rescue analgesia in group RD and group R were 16.32 6 3.11 hours and 10.82 6 2.16 hours, respectively (P < .0001). Mean CHEOPS score were 4.48 6 1.1 and 6.3 6 1.74 (P < .024) in group RD and R. Post-op Ramsay sedation score was significantly greater in group RD. Heart rate and blood pressure remained similar in either of the group. No episode of respiratory depression, bradycardia or hypotension was noted perioperatively. Combination of 1 mg kg 1 dexmedetomidine with reduced concentration of ropivacaine (0.2%) produced significantly longer duration of post-operative analgesia and lowered post-operative CHEOPS pain score in comparison with 0.375% ropivacaine alone in USG guided TAP block for paediatric hernia repair.

COMPARISON OF EFFECT OF 0.25% BUPIVACAINE ALONE AND 0.25% BUPIVACAINE WITH DEXMEDETOMIDINE IN BRACHIAL PLEXUS BLOCK THROUGH SUPRACLAVICULAR APPROACH

BACKGROUND AND AIM:Brachial plexus block is a safe, effective, low-cost anesthesia with good postoperative analgesia. Adjuvants to local anesthetics may enhance the quality and duration of analgesia. The aim of the study was to study the efcacy of a combination of 0.25% bupivacaine alone versus 0.25% bupivacaine and dexmedetomidine in brachial plexus block by supraclavicular approach. METHODS: This is a prospective double-blind study conducted on sixty patients of ASA1 and ASA2 posted for upper limb surgeries, randomized in a double-blind fashion into two groups. Group A (N-30) received 34ml of 0.25% bupivacaine with 0.5ml of distilled water and group B (N-30) received 0.5ml dexmedetomidine (50 μg) with 34ml of 0.25% bupivacaine as supraclavicular brachial plexus block with help of a nerve stimulator. Onset and recovery time of sensory and motor block, duration of analgesia, sedation scores, quality of block, and side effects compared in both groups. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were well matched in both groups. The intraoperative hemodynamic recording was done at 15 min time intervals from the administration of the drugs. There was a reduction in heart rate, systolic blood pressure, and diastolic blood pressure 30 mins onwards in both groups. There was no signicant difference in the onset of sensory and motor blocks. Duration of sensory block was 299.57 ± 35.94 mins in Group A and 782.2 ± 82.76 mins in Group B, duration of motor block was 272.17 ± 37.31 mins versus 755.63 +/- 86.6 mins respectively, total duration of analgesia was 321 ± 35.46 mins versus 815.80 +/- 88.1 mins respectively. Ramsay sedation score was similar at arrival in both groups but in post-op, the score of 3 was noted in 0% (0/ 30) in Gr A and 93.3% (28/ 30) in Gr B . Quality of analgesia was also better in Group B. There were no signicant adverse events noted in both groups. CONCLUSION: This double-blind Randomized Controlled study showing the combination of dexmedetomidine 50 μg with 34ml of 0.25% bupivacaine is better than 0.5ml of distilled water with 34ml of 0.25% bupivacaine in the duration of sensory and motor block, with better sedation and quality of analgesia with the good safety prole in brachial plexus block by supraclavicular approach.

Effectiveness of standard direct laryngoscopy with a Macintosh blade, the McGrath videolaryngoscope, and the Airtraq optical laryngoscopes for assessment of vocal cord mobility following thyroid surgery

BackgroundAccurate and timely evaluation of vocal cord function following thyroid surgery relieves the stress of both surgeon and anesthesiologist along with optimizing ongoing management. Conventional direct laryngoscopy is the commonly used tool for vocal cord assessment during extubation in thyroid surgeries. Videolaryngoscopes, are not well researched as an equipment to prognosticate extubation in thyroid surgery. Appropriate visualization and assessment of vocal cords during extubation with videolaryngoscopes can be useful for record keeping and documentation. This study was therefore conducted to compare the conventional direct laryngoscopy with prototypes of channeled and non-channeled videolaryngoscopes – Airtraq and McGrath respectively for extubation in thyroid surgery. ObjectiveThe aim of the study was to compare laryngoscopic view, vocal cord mobility during extubation after thyroid surgeries and to assess patient comfort during laryngoscopy. MethodsFollowing approval from the Institutional Ethics board and informed consent from the patients, a prospective randomised study was conducted in 66 patients. Patients posted for elective thyroid surgery were recruited and followed a routine anaesthesia protocol for intubation. Towards the end of surgery dexmedetomidine infusion was started and patients appropriately reversed. Depending on the group, allotted patients underwent laryngoscopy either with standard direct laryngoscope with the Macintosh blade, McGrath MAC blade 3, or Airtraq size 3 optical laryngoscope. During laryngoscopy Cormack-Lehane grading, vocal cord mobility and patient reactivity were assessed and patients were extubated. ResultsGlottic visualization as assessed by the Cormack-Lehane grades were comparable among the three groups. Change in the Cormack-Lehane grading when compared with the one at the time of intubation was better with Airtraq than the other two groups with a p value of 0.023. The patient reactivity score was statistically significant between the groups (p = 0.006), and Airtraq scored better. The Ramsay sedation scores at different time intervals was not significant between the groups. Vocal cord mobility grading and complications were not different between the three groups. ConclusionVideolaryngoscopes provide a better glottic view during extubation with better patient reactivity scores. Airtraq outperformed standard laryngoscope and McGrath having better Cormack-Lehane grades and a better patient reactivity score.

A comparative study of dexmedetomidine and propofol infusion during monitored anesthesia care (MAC) in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): a randomized controlled trial

BackgroundEndoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP) is an invasive procedure and hence is distressing for awake patients, requiring adequate level of sedation and analgesia. Recent advancements have encouraged use of monitored anesthesia care (MAC), that allows the patient to tolerate unpleasant procedures while maintaining cardio-respiratory function. The main aim is to compare the effect of dexmedetomidine and propofol on the hemodynamics during ERCP, quality of sedation, recovery profile, and any side effects. A total of 100 patients were randomized by a computer-generated random number table into two groups of 30 patients each. The group P received continuous propofol infusion at a rate of 25-75 mcg/kg/min to achieve a Ramsay sedation scale (RSS) of 3-4 before starting the procedure. Group D received dexmedetomidine at loading dose of 1 μg/kg i.v. over 10 min followed by 0.5 μg/kg/h infusion until RSS reached 3-4.ResultsThe present study shows significant decrease in heart rate in group D (65.27 ± 4. 3 vs.77.27 ± 9.3) with more stable blood pressure values throughout than group P. There were episodes of transient desaturation in few patients in group P while no patient showed any signs of respiratory depression or desaturation in group D. The time to achieve Ramsay sedation score (RSS) 3-4 is significantly more in group D (11.4 ± 1.37 vs. 7.93 ± 1.32) with increased tendency to use rescue drug but shows better and early recovery.ConclusionDexmedetomidine is a better substitute to propofol for patients undergoing ERCP; however, use of adjunct may be necessary to decrease the need for rescue drug.

Effectiveness of analgesia with hydromorphone hydrochloride for postoperative pain following surgical repair of structural congenital malformations in children: a randomized controlled trial

BackgroundEffective postoperative analgesia is needed to prevent the negative effects of postoperative pain on patient outcomes. To compare the effectiveness of hydromorphone hydrochloride and sufentanil, combined with flurbiprofen axetil, for postoperative analgesia in pediatric patients.MethodsThis prospective randomized controlled trial included 222 pediatric patients scheduled for repair of a structural congenital malformation under general anesthesia. Patients were randomized into 3 groups: hydromorphone hydrochloride 0.1 mg/kg (H1), hydromorphone hydrochloride 0.2 mg/kg; (H2) or sufentanil 1.5 µg/kg (S). Analgesics were diluted in 0.9% saline to 100 ml and infused continuously at a basic flow rate of 2 mL per h. The primary outcome measure was the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability (FLACC) pain score. Secondary outcomes included heart rate (HR), respiration rate (RR), SpO2, Ramsay sedation scores, scores on the Paediatric Anaesthesia Emergence Delirium (PAED) scale, adverse reactions, parent satisfaction with analgesia.ResultsThe FLACC score was significantly lower in H1 and H2 groups compared to S. The Ramsay sedation score was significantly higher in H1 and H2 groups compared to S. Recovery time was shorter in H1 group compared to patients H2 group or S group. There were no significant differences in the PAED scale, HR, RR, SpO2, adverse reactions, satisfaction of parents with analgesia, or length and cost of hospital stay.ConclusionsHydromorphone hydrochloride is a more effective analgesic than sufentanil for postoperative pain in pediatric patients following surgical repair of a structural congenital malformation, however, hydromorphone hydrochloride and sufentanil had similar safety profiles in this patient population.Trial registrationChinese Clinical Trial Register ChiCTR-INR-17013935). Clinical trial registry URL: Date of registration: December 14, 2017.

Study of Adductor Canal Block Using Ropivacaine Alone and in Combination with Additive (Fentanyl) For Post-Operative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Knee Arthroscopic Surgeries

Background: Knee arthroscopy is a common orthopedic procedure done worldwide. Despite its minimally invasive nature compared to the traditional knee surgery, post-arthroscopic pain may be severe, and the patients generally require a significant amount of opioid-based analgesics after such procedures. Aim: The objective of present study was to compare the block of femoral nerve at adductor canal using ropivacaine with additives like Fentanyl with regard to longevity and density of the block in comparison to plain ropivacaine. Methods: Patients of either sex in the age group of 18-75 years, having body mass index (BMI) of 20-35 kg/m2 and belonging to ASA (I &amp; II), who were scheduled to undergo elective knee arthroscopic surgeries were observed in this study. On the evening before surgery, the visual analogue scale (VAS) Scoring was explained to all patients. All the included patients were categorized into two groups viz. GROUP A: Received 20ml of 0.2% Ropivacaine + 2ml of Normal Saline (Total 22ml), GROUP B: Receiving 20ml of 0.2% Ropivacaine + Fentanyl 1mcg/kg diluted in 2ml of Normal Saline (Total 22ml). Results: Sedation score was assessed by using Ramsay Sedation Score (RSS). There was no significant difference in demographic profile of the patients among various groups. Difference in the duration of analgesia was statistically significant among the two groups with longest duration in Group B (7.6+1.20 hours) and was least in Group A (4.3+1.70 hours) (p value &lt;0.01). Total consumption of analgesia (Injection Tramadol 1mg/kg, IV) over a period of 24 hours in Group A was 200+28.76mg and in it Group B it was 108.9+30.64mg. Total quantity of rescue analgesia consumed was more in Group A as compared to Group B among the two study groups (P value &lt;0.001).Incidences of side effects in the subjects were insignificant and only few side effects were noted like, 3.4% of patients in Group A had nausea. 3.2% patients in Group B had vomiting. Bradycardia was noted in 3.4% ...

Comparison of efficacy of gabapentin and memantine premedication in laparoscopic cholecystectomies for postoperative pain relief - A randomised placebo controlled trial.

Background and Aims:The multiplicity of the mechanisms of the pain in laparoscopic cholecystectomy inclines us to the usage of multimodal analgesia. Gabapentin is known for its analgesic efficacy when given as premedication in many surgeries. N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonists are used for both acute and chronic pain, but the use of memantine in the perioperative period is less studied. The aim of this randomised controlled study was to subjectively and objectively compare postoperative pain relief using gabapentin, memantine and placebo as premedication.Methods:Sixty-six patients posted for laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomised into three groups. During the preoperative assessment, the baseline threshold and tolerance values of pain were measured using an algesiometer. Patients were pre-medicated with oral gabapentin 600 mg or memantine 20 mg or placebo an hour before surgery. Following extubation, pain scores were reassessed (both subjectively and objectively) along with Ramsay sedation scores at different time intervals for 4 h postoperatively.Results:Gabapentin group had lower Numerical Rating Scale scores at 15 min and 1 h postoperatively when compared to the other two groups. Memantine group had a longer time for the first request for rescue analgesia (50.53 min) compared to gabapentin and placebo. The objective assessment of pain with analgesiometer showed no statistical significance between the three groups for both threshold and tolerance values. Ramsay sedation scores were higher in the gabapentin group compared to the other two.Conclusion:Gabapentin provides better postoperative pain relief compared to memantine when given as single dose premedication for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

The preventive effect of dexmedetomidine combined with nalbuphine on fentany-linduced hyperalgesia after nanocarbon laparoscopic hysterectomy

This study aimed to explore the preventive effect of dexmedetomidine combined with nalbuphine on fentany-linduced hyperalgesia after nanocarbon laparoscopic hysterectomy. A total of 172 patients diagnosed with cervical cancer and undergoing nanocarbon laparoscopic hysterectomy at Second Hospital of Lanzhou University from February 2017 to October 2019 were selected and divided into a control group (Group C), patients treated with dexmedetomidine (DEX) combined with nalbuphine as the combined group (Group M), the dexmedetomidine group (Group D), and the nalbuphine group (Group N). The imaging and detection rate of sentinel lymph nodes traced by carbon nanoparticles (CNP) was observed and counted, the sedation score and visual analog score (VAS), mechanical pain threshold 24 h before and after the operation, mean arterial pressure (MBP) at each time, heart rate (HR), and adverse reactions were all recorded. The results showed that the total detection rate, sensitivity, and accuracy of CNP tracer sentinel lymph nodes were 97.67%, 90.47%, 95.34%, and 97.67%, respectively. The sentinel and black-stained lymph nodes removed after surgery did not fade. The time of recovery, the HR after intubation, pneumoperitoneum, and extubation in group D were significantly different from the other three groups (P &lt; 0.05). The pain threshold, MBP P &lt; after intubation, and VAS scores at T0–T3 were significantly different from those in other groups (P &lt; 0.05); the Ramsay sedation score was higher in group D than T0–T2 (P &lt; 0.05); the time of first analgesia, the amount of sufentanil, and the number of analgesic pump compressions in group C were significantly different from those in other groups (P &lt; 0.05). The incidence rate of bradycardia in group D was 48.83%, and that of postoperative chills in group C was 30.23%, which was significantly different from other groups (P &lt; 0.05). Therefore, DEX combined with nalbuphine based on nano-carbon laparoscopic hysterectomy could reduce remifentanil-induced hyperalgesia and postoperative side effects, which provided a reference for the prevention of hyperalgesia.

Comparison of Preoperative Nebulization with 4% Lignocaine and Ketamine in Reduction of Incidence of Postoperative Sore Throat.

Background:Postoperative sore throat (POST) is a common occurrence following general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation although clinicians often regard it as a minor complication. The incidence of POST is estimated to be 21%–65% in different studies. The administration of the drug through aerosol route gained popularity among anesthesiologists with good acceptance from the patients. Hence, we conducted the study with the aim to compare the efficacy of preoperative nebulization with 4% lignocaine and ketamine, in the prevention of POST.Materials and Methods:The study is a prospective, randomized double-blinded study comparing the effects of comparison between preoperative nebulization with ketamine and 4% lignocaine in preventing POST. Hemodynamic parameters, Ramsay sedation score, and visual analog scale (VAS) at 0, 6, and 24 h were observed in both groups.Results:Ketamine nebulization provides better prophylaxis against the occurrence of moderate-to-severe POST as compared to lignocaine. At 0 h, none of the patients had ST in both the groups; at 6 and 24 h, the ST was significantly higher in lignocaine group (28.9% and 8.9%) as compared to ketamine group (8.9% and 0%), with P = 0.04. Mild, moderate, and severe VAS was observed in 51%, 33%, and 16% of Group 1, respectively, while in Group 2, it was observed in 16%, 36%, and 49% of study population, respectively, and this difference was statistically significant.Conclusion:Patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation were benefitted from ketamine nebulization as prophylaxis against moderate-to-severe POST.

Combined Spinal Epidural Anaesthesia Technique with Ketamine Infusion for Emergency Laparotomy of a Known COVID-19 Case at High Altitude of 12000 Feet Above Mean Sea Level

SARS-CoV-2 is a highly infectious virus known to cause severe acute respiratory syndrome in humans known as COVID-19. It is well established that the mode of transmission is through aerosol generation. Since the invasive procedures like endotracheal intubation place the anaesthesiologist and the operating room staff highly exposed to the risk of infection it is prudent to follow regional anaesthesia technique wherever possible. The present case is of a 34-year-old COVID 19 positive male patient who underwent emergency laparotomy in a service hospital of armed forces at 12000 feet above sea level under combined spinal and epidural anaesthesia supplemented with sedation using intravenous infusion of Ketamine. After the attachment of standard ASA monitor and taking in account of baseline readings patient was administered an 18-gauge epidural secured in the T12-L1 level with the catheter was fix at 12 cm on the skin. Sub arachnoid block was administered to the patient using 2.75 ml of 0.5 % Bupivacaine (heavy) and 25 mcg of Fentanyl in L2-L3 space using a 26-gauge spinal needle in sitting position. Once the height of the block was ascertained at T6 level by loss of temperature sensation the surgery commenced. Patient was administered with 3.0 mg of Morphine in epidural space for perioperative analgesia. For allaying intraoperative discomfort patient was sedation infusion of Ketamine of 0.6mg/kg/hr to keep the Ramsay sedation score between 3-4. The intraoperative period was uneventful, and the patient did not require any supplemental analgesia during the surgery. Post operatively the patient was pain free and comfortable with no features of hypopnea, post-operative nausea vomiting and shivering and was shifted to the post-operative care unit in the covid facility of the hospital.