The discovery of the hepatitis G virus (HGV) has given hepatologists a new lease on life. Just when they were becoming frustrated with the slow rate of progress in unravelling the pathobiological consequences of hepatitis B and C virus infections, along comes another candidate virus. HGV, a single-stranded ribonucleic acid (RNA) virus that belongs to the Flaviviridae family, has a global distribution. The virus is present in 1–2% of blood donors in the USA, a frequency higher than that of either HCV or hepatitis B virus (HBV) (Alter). Even more striking is the seroprevalence of 15.2% reported in West African residents (J Med Virol 1996; 50: 97). HGV exists in a chronic carrier state. The virus is transmitted parenterally and is often present in patients who have received multiple transfusions or who are on haemodialysis (N Engl J Med 1996; 334: 1485), and in intravenous drug users. There is preliminary evidence for perinatal transmission (Lancet 1996; 347: 615). HGV RNA sequences have been identified in serum from patients with non-A-E acute and chronic hepatitis and cirrhosis. Impressive data comes from Brescia, Italy, where 35% of patients with acute hepatitis and 39% of those with chronic hepatitis were positive for HGV RNA (Fiordalisi). Among blood donors the virus is more common in those with raised serum amino transferase concentrations (3.9%) than in those with normal concentrations (0.8%) (J Med Virol 1996; 50: 97). These findings imply that HGV is a human pathogen, but is it? Other information is more consistent with HGV being an innocent passenger. The great majority of individuals who become HGV-RNA positive after blood transfusion have normal serum amino transperase concentrations and neither they, nor those found positive for HGV RNA in other circumstances, develop liver disease during prolonged follow-up (Alter). Moreover, when serum enzyme concentrations are raised they seldom accord with levels of viraemia. HGV and HCV are often, and HGV and HBV less often, found together in serum. In those coinfected with HGV and HCV, amino transterases run parallel to HCV rather than HGV, and the presence of the latter seems to have no effect on outcome. HGV usually accounts for only a minority of cases of acute non-A-E hepatitis, and there is no evidence yet of progression over time to chronic hepatitis, cirrhosis, or hepatocellular carcinoma, as occurs with HBV and HCV. Although severe (even fulminant) cases of community-acquired acute hepatitis G have been reported, some of the patients had histories suggestive of earlier exposure to HGV and HGV RNA has persisted for a long time after clinical and biochemical recovery, so one possibility is that they were chronic carriers of the virus and the acute liver injury had another cause. HGV positivity rates in patients with chronic non-A-E hepatitis are not usually higher than in patients with non-viral hepatitis. Inclusion of HGV among the hepatitis viruses may have been premature. Furthermore, it is obvious that at least one virus that causes clinically significant liver disease is still out there waiting to be identified. Several other important observations appeared during 1996. Ursodeoxycholic acid, long known to improve the symptoms and disturbed biochemistry in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis, was finally shown to improve long-term survival as well. Ecstasy (3,4 methyl-enedioxymethamphetamine) unsurprisingly proved to be hepatotoxic. Eight patients with severe acute liver failure were reported: all but one required liver transplantation and six died.
Read full abstract