Some factors affecting stemflow chemistry were examined. For events of similar size, the amount and frequency of antecedent rainfall were important for both forests. Bark type was important for the eucalypts, as was the debarking season for the smooth-barked species. Correlations for tree basal area versus concentration were established for the pines and three eucalypt species. On average, stemflow was responsible for 10% of the nutrient input for the eucalypts and 11% for the pines. For the pines, the cation composition is dominated by Na and K. Eucalypt stemflow is dominated by K. The relative inputs of inorganic nitrogen and the major cations are presented for the pines and four eucalypt species. There was a net uptake of NH4-N by the pines and a release of NO3-N. For the eucalypts, both were released by all species, except for E. melliodora which absorbed NO3-N. E. rossii dominated nitrogen release. Apart from E. melliodora, the pH of stemflow of all eucalypt species and pines was less than that of rainfall. The pH values for E. melliodora and rainfall were similar. The chemical concentration of stemflow samples taken during events was greatly influenced by the intensity and continuity of the rainfall, and different eucalypt species were influenced in different ways. The relative chemical inputs of rainfall, throughfall and stemflow of the principal cations, Ca, Mg, Na, and K, were very variable, even between events of similar total rainfall. The total cation average inputs in g ha−1 mm−1 of rainfall were: for the eucalypts, rainfall 10·7 (34%), throughfall 17·4 (55%) and stemflow 3·4 (11%); and for the pines, rainfall 10·7 (32%), throughfall 18·4 (55%) and stemflow 4·7 (14%). Thus, on average, throughfall makes the major contribution, but in individual events of similar size, rainfall input can be anything from 25 to 78% of the total for the eucalypts and 10 to 54% for the pines. There is also a substantial variation in the cation composition of all three components. It was possible to make a reasonable assessment of the probable throughfall and stemflow inputs by considering antecedent conditions, season, and certain event characteristics such as the intensity and rain angle. For the eucalypt forest, the summer debarking of the smooth-barked species affected the concentration and volume of both throughfall and stemflow. For rainfall however, assessment of likely inputs was not possible except for some marine-influenced easterly events.