Frequent periods of low rainfall accompanying climate change are expected to affect many aspects of agricultural production and greenhouse gas emissions. In this work, we conducted field experiments on soil CO2 efflux and soil microbial activity using two precipitation treatments and two crop management technologies. While the control treatment was exposed to natural precipitation, the reduced water availability was induced during the early stages of crop growth using rain-exclusion shelters within the water deficit treatment. We aimed to test the difference in the response to water deficit between two management technologies: conventional tillage (CT - ploughed without cover crops) and adaptation technology (AT - no-till with species rich cover crops). After a month of simulated water deficit, the soil CO2 efflux under a regime of adaptation technology was essentially the same as that under the conventional technology, and the decrease in soil CO2 efflux ranged between 22 % and 55 %. The water deficit had a technology-specific effect on microbes. While no effect on the microbial carbon under CT was observed, the water deficit decreased Cmic under AT. In contrast, the opposite pattern was observed for DHA. When a normal soil water regime was restored, CO2 efflux recovered rapidly while recovery of microbial biomass and dehydrogenase activity was more variable. Generally, the soil microbial biomass and activity recovered better under AT. The results show that while the reduction in Rs during water deficit and its recovery after the restoration of the ambient precipitation regime were not affected by the technology, the response of microbial biomass and activity to water deficit depended on the technology with better recovery under AT.
Read full abstract