Left-sided Breast Cancer Radiotherapy Research Articles

Evaluation of Cardiac Substructures Exposure of DIBH-3DCRT, FB-HT, and FB-3DCRT in Hypofractionated Radiotherapy for Left-Sided Breast Cancer after Breast-Conserving Surgery: An In Silico Planning Study

Left-sided breast cancer radiotherapy can lead to late cardiovascular complications, including ischemic events. To mitigate these risks, cardiac-sparing techniques such as deep-inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) have been developed. However, recent studies have shown that mean heart dose is not a sufficient dosimetric parameter for assessing cardiac exposure. In this study, we aimed to compare the radiation exposure to cardiac substructures for ten patients who underwent hypofractionated radiotherapy using DIBH three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT), free-breathing (FB)-3DCRT, and FB helical tomotherapy (HT). Dosimetric parameters of cardiac substructures were analyzed, and the results were statistically compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. This study found a significant reduction in the dose to the heart, left anterior descending coronary artery, and ventricles with DIBH-3DCRT and FB-HT compared to FB-3DCRT. While DIBH-3DCRT was very effective in sparing the heart, in some cases, it provided little or no cardiac sparing. FB-HT can be an interesting treatment modality to reduce the dose to major coronary vessels and ventricles and may be of interest for patients with cardiovascular risks who do not benefit from or cannot perform DIBH. These findings highlight the importance of cardiac-sparing techniques for precise delivery of radiation therapy.

Comparison of 3D-conformal and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for left-sided breast cancer

Background: We compared 3D-conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) planning for left-sided post-mastectomy patients. Aim: To compare the dose coverage of the planning target volume (PTV) and dose delivered to organs at risk (OAR) of 3D-CRT and IMRT plans. Setting: Department of Oncology, central South Africa. Methods: Twenty-six archived CT scans of patients with left-sided breast cancer were included. The 3D-CRT and IMRT plans were designed for each patient and compared using the Monaco © planning system (version 5.11.02). Statistical analysis was performed for PTV coverage (V 95% , V 98% , V 105% ) and radiation doses to the heart, ipsilateral lung, combined lungs, contralateral breast, and oesophagus. Results: The V 98% and V 105% target volume dose coverage for the 3D-CRT plans were 67.07% and 0.21%, respectively, compared to 92.32% and 1.10% of the IMRT plans. However, the IMRT plans’ mean volume of PTV, receiving 95% of the prescribed dose (PD), was 7.68% compared to the 3D-CRT’s 32.93%. The IMRT plans resulted in a V 22 Gy < 10% for the heart, with a value of 4.15%. The V 18.87 Gy < 45% values for the ipsilateral and combined lungs were 28.09% and 13.70%, respectively. The 3D-CRT plans showed a lower dose to the oesophagus (5.07 Gy) and contralateral breast (V 5 Gy < 15% = 3.51%). Conclusion: It was shown that 3D-CRT and IMRT treatment planning can effectively achieve clinical goals for post-mastectomy left-sided breast cancer radiotherapy. Contribution: The findings underscore the continuing relevance of 3D-CRT planning in oncology for optimal PTV dose coverage and low OAR dose.

The effect of breath-hold technique on conformal and intensity modulated radiotherapy techniques at right breast cancer radiotherapy including internal mammarian field

Background/Aim: Significantly lower heart doses can be achieved by breath-hold technique at left-sided breast cancer radiotherapy (RT). We see high doses at organs at risk such as lung, heart, and contralateral breast during right-sided breast cancer RT planning especially in the presence of RT indication for mammaria interna (MI) lymph nodes. This study compared RT-planning methods that are conformal with intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) with breath holding and free breathing for right-sided breast cancer RT including full axillary and MI lymph node fields. Methods: Computed tomography (CT) simulations were performed using free-breath (FB) and breath-hold (BH) methods in 10 patients with right-sided breast cancer. A total of 40 RT treatment plans were calculated. Right-sided breast, level 1-2-3 axillary regions, and MI regions served for the target-planning volume. Left-sided breast, heart, as well as right-sided and left lungs were contoured as critical organs according to the atlas of the "Radiation Therapy Oncology Group." We used a Varian Eclipse v.13 for treatment planning. Conformal “FieldinField” RT (FinFRT) and dynamic IMRT (dIMRT) planning were performed separately for each patient over breath-hold and free-breath images. For PTV, 50 Gy was prescribed in 25 fractions and optimized such that the planned target volume (PTV) remained between 95% and 110% of the dose. The mean and maximum doses of the heart, V5 and V20 of the lungs, as well as V95 doses for MI were recorded. Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS version 22, and a paired t-test was used for comparison. Results: Four treatment plans (FB FinFRT, BH FinFRT, FB dIMRT, BH dIMRT) were made separately for 10 patients. For comparison, common FB FinFRT plans were accepted as the baseline plan. As expected, there were no significant differences in PTV coverage. The mean dose received by 95% of the MI volume was between 42.27 Gy and 42.4 Gy. For the maximum heart dose, the breath hold technique had no significant effect on plans. The lowest average maximum heart dose was seen in the BH FinFRT group. Mean heart doses are between 1.28 Gy – 4.85 Gy. There was no significance between BH FinFRT and FB FinFRT plan (P=0.504), and there was a significant difference for heart mean dose versus dIMRT plans (P=0.001). The mean V20 of the lungs ranged from 11.9 to 17.8. There was a significant decrease in V20 with BH or FB dIMRT plans (P=0.001). There was no difference between BH FinFRT (P=0.138). On the contrary, lung V5 values were significantly higher in dIMRT plans, and the lowest mean V5 value was seen in BH FinFRT plan. Conclusion: With the BH method, lower doses (but not significantly lower doses) were obtained in critical organ doses. There was a significant decrease with FinFRT plans in terms of heart mean and maximum dose and lung V5 percentages. The dIMRT plans were significant only in lung V20 percentages. When planning RT, we recommend evaluating all treatment techniques individually for right-sided breast cancer patients to obtain lower doses in critical organs.

PO-2334 Cardiac conduction nodes exposure in hypofractionated left-sided breast cancer radiotherapy

PO-2334 Cardiac conduction nodes exposure in hypofractionated left-sided breast cancer radiotherapy

PO-2338 Does gastric volume impact lung’s exposure in loco-regional left-sided breast cancer radiotherapy?

PO-2338 Does gastric volume impact lung’s exposure in loco-regional left-sided breast cancer radiotherapy?

BRAVEHeart: a randomised trial comparing the accuracy of Breathe Well and RPM for deep inspiration breath hold breast cancer radiotherapy

BackgroundDeep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) reduces radiotherapy cardiac dose for left-sided breast cancer patients. The primary aim of the BRAVEHeart (Breast Radiotherapy Audio Visual Enhancement for sparing the Heart) trial is to assess the accuracy and usability of a novel device, Breathe Well, for DIBH guidance for left-sided breast cancer patients. Breathe Well will be compared to an adapted widely available monitoring system, the Real-time Position Management system (RPM).MethodsBRAVEHeart is a single institution prospective randomised trial of two DIBH devices. BRAVEHeart will assess the DIBH accuracy for Breathe Well and RPM during left-sided breast cancer radiotherapy. After informed consent has been obtained, 40 patients will be randomised into two equal groups, the experimental arm (Breathe Well) and the control arm (RPM with in-house modification of an added patient screen). The primary hypothesis of BRAVEHeart is that the accuracy of Breathe Well in maintaining the position of the chest during DIBH is superior to the RPM system. Accuracy will be measured by comparing chest wall motion extracted from images acquired of the treatment field during breast radiotherapy for patients treated using the Breathe Well system and those using the RPM system.DiscussionThe Breathe Well device uses a depth camera to monitor the chest surface while the RPM system monitors a block on the patient’s abdomen. The hypothesis of this trial is that the chest surface is a better surrogate for the internal chest wall motion used as a measure of treatment accuracy. The Breathe Well device aims to deliver an easy-to-use implementation of surface monitoring. The findings from the study will help inform the technology choice for other centres performing DIBH.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.govNCT02881203. Registered on 26 August 2016.

Dosimetric Comparison of Different Fractionated 3D Radiotherapy Regimens for Breast Conservation

Background and Objectives This study compared conventional dose fractionation and hypofractionation in breast cancer radiotherapy to optimize treatment planning using different physical indices Subjects and Methods In this retrospective study, the treatment plans of 30 patients eligible for radiotherapy for left-sided breast cancer were investigated. Patients were treated with a conventional dose- interval regimen and three hypofractionated regimens. Dosimetry indexes such as the homogeneity index, conformity index, and mean dose to the left breast, lung, and heart were extracted from the dose-volume histogram and compared with each other to study the four different treatment regimens. Results According to the data obtained, the mean dose to the left breast (PTV), heart and ipsilateral lung was significantly reduced in hypofractionation methods compared to conventional regimen. The homogeneity and the conformity index values showed no significant difference in any of the treatment regimens. The dose received showed no difference in lung volume. For heart, the volume of 38 and 43% of the prescribed dose were significantly higher in the conventional method than in the three hypofractionation regimens. Conclusion Hypofraction treatment regimens with fewer treatment fraction and a dose per fraction greater than 2Gy compared to conventional dose fractionation led to a dose reduction for the heart and the same side of the lung.

Robustness of VMAT to setup errors in postmastectomy radiotherapy of left-sided breast cancer: Impact of bolus thickness.

Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with varied bolus thicknesses has been employed in postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) of breast cancer to improve superficial target coverage. However, impact of bolus thickness on plan robustness remains unclear. The study enrolled ten patients with left-sided breast cancer who received radiotherapy using VMAT with 5 mm and 10 mm bolus (VMAT-5B and VMAT-10B). Inter-fractional setup errors were simulated by introducing a 3 mm shift to isocenter of the original plans in the anterior-posterior, left-right, and inferior-superior directions. The plans (perturbed plans) were recalculated without changing other parameters. Dose volume histograms (DVH) were collected for plan evaluation. Absolute dose differences in DVH endpoints for the clinical target volume (CTV), heart, and left lung between the perturbed plans and the original ones were used for robustness analysis. VMAT-10B showed better target coverage, while VMAT-5B was superior in organs-at-risk (OARs) sparing. As expected, small setup errors of 3 mm could induce dose fluctuations in CTV and OARs. The differences in CTV were small in VMAT-5B, with a maximum difference of -1.05 Gy for the posterior shifts. For VMAT-10B, isocenter shifts in the posterior and right directions significantly decreased CTV coverage. The differences were -1.69 Gy, -1.48 Gy and -1.99 Gy, -1.69 Gy for ΔD95% and ΔD98%, respectively. Regarding the OARs, only isocenter shifts in the posterior, right, and inferior directions increased dose to the left lung and the heart. Differences in VMAT-10B were milder than those in VMAT-5B. Specifically, mean heart dose were increased by 0.42 Gy (range 0.10 ~ 0.95 Gy) and 0.20 Gy (range -0.11 ~ 0.72 Gy), and mean dose for the left lung were increased by 1.02 Gy (range 0.79 ~ 1.18 Gy) and 0.68 Gy (range 0.47 ~ 0.84 Gy) in VMAT-5B and VMAT-10B, respectively. High-dose volumes in the organs were increased by approximate 0 ~ 2 and 1 ~ 3 percentage points, respectively. Nevertheless, most of the dosimetric parameters in the perturbed plans were still clinically acceptable. VMAT-5B appears to be more robust to 3 mm setup errors than VMAT-10B. VMAT-5B also resulted in better OARs sparing with acceptable target coverage and dose homogeneity. Therefore 5 mm bolus is recommended for PMRT of left-sided breast cancer using VMAT.

Optimal radiotherapy modality sparing for cardiac valves in left-sided breast cancer.

The cardiotoxicity caused by radiotherapy is a critical problem in the treatment of patients with breast cancer. The appropriate radiotherapy modality sparing for cardiac valves in left-sided breast cancer has not been well defined. The aim of this study was thus to compare the dosimetric differences in heart and cardiac valves of 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT), fixed-field intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) to find the optimal radiotherapy modality sparing for cardiac valves in patients with left breast cancer. From January 5, 2021, to March 15, 2021, 21 patients with left-sided breast cancer postmastectomy were included in this study, and 3 different plans for adjuvant radiation were created using 3D-CRT, IMRT, and VMAT for each patient. All patients received 50 Gy in 25 fractions. The mean dose (Dmean) of the heart; percentage volume of the heart receiving ≥5 Gy (V5), ≥30 Gy (V30), and ≥40 Gy (V40); and the Dmean and the near-maximum dose (D0.03cc) of cardiac valves were extracted from dose-volume histograms (DVHs) and compared. The correlations in dosimetric factors between cardiac valves and the whole heart were analyzed. IMRT significantly decreased the values of V5, V30, V40, and Dmean in the whole heart compared to 3D-CRT and VMAT (P<0.001). Among the 3 different plans, IMRT had the lowest radiation dose to the Dmean and the D0.03cc of the aortic valve (1.27 Gy/1.75 Gy), pulmonary valve (3.44 Gy/6.89 Gy), tricuspid valve (1.02 Gy/1.14 Gy), and mitral valve (0.93 Gy/1.00 Gy). Pearson correlation analysis found that local parameters (Dmean and D0.03cc) within valves were strongly correlated to the global parameters (V5, V30, V40, and Dmean) of the heart. This study revealed that IMRT showed the lowest cardiac valves dose compared with 3D-CRT and VMAT in left-sided breast cancer radiotherapy. IMRT might be the optimal modality sparing for cardiac valves in this group of patients. Further studies need to be carried out in order to validate the protective role of IMRT on the cardiac valves.

The Efficacy of Multi-Leaf Collimator in the Reduction of Cardiac and Coronary Artery Dose in Left-Sided Breast Cancer Radiotherapy.

Multi-leaf collimator (MLC) is one of the efficient and cost-effective methods for protecting sensitive tissues around the target. This study aimed to evaluate the protective effect of MLC on the protection of sensitive organs in patients with left breast cancer. This study was performed on computed tomography (CT) scans of 45 patients with left breast cancer. Two treatment plans were completed for each patient. Only the heart and left lung were considered organs at risk in the first treatment plan, and in the second treatment plan, the left anterior descending artery (LAD) was also considered the organ at risk. It was covered as much as possible by the MLC. Dosimetric results of tumor and organ at risk (OARs) were extracted from the dose-volume histogram and compared. The results showed that more LAD coverage by MLC leads to a significant reduction in the mean dose of OARs (P-value <0.05). The mean dose for heart, LAD, and left lung decreased by 11%, 7.4%, and 4.9%, respectively. The values of V5 (volume received the dose of 5 Gy) and V20 for the lung, V10, V25, and V30 for LAD, and V5, V20, V25, and V30 for the heart also decreased significantly (P-value <0.05). In general, better protection of LAD, heart, and lungs can be achieved by maximal shielding organs at risk by MLC in radiation therapy for patients with left breast cancer.

Comparison of normal tissue doses in deep inspiration breath-hold and free breathing methods for radiotherapy of left-sided breast cancer using 4D-XCAT digital phantom.

To evaluate normal lung and heart tissue doses for treatment of left-sided breast cancer in deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) and free breathing (FB) as a function of breast size and diaphragm displacement using 4D-XCAT digital phantom in a simulation study. 4D-XCAT digital phantom was used to create 36 left-sided breast cancer digital phantom datasets with different breast height (BH) of 40, 50, and 60 mm, breast length (BL) of 16, 17, and 18 mm, and diaphragm excursion of 20, 25, 30, and 35 mm. For each dataset, DIBH and FB treatment plans were prepared using planning computerized radiotherapy-three dimensional (PCRT-3D) treatment planning system (TPS) with superposition computational algorithm. Dose differences in DIBH and FB plans were assessed in terms of mean lung dose (MLD), the lung volume receiving ≤20 Gy (V20), normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) of the lung, mean heart dose (MHD), and the heart volume receiving ≤30 (V30). DIBH reduced mean dose and V20 and NTCP of the lung in all cases, by up to 4.37 Gy, 7.62%, and 18.95%. Mean dose and V30 of the heart were also significantly reduced by 5.02 Gy and 8.23%. The use of DIBH for left-sided breast cancer radiotherapy offers excellent possibilities for sparing critical normal tissue without compromising radiation dose to the target.

Surface guided 3DCRT in deep-inspiration breath-hold for left sided breast cancer radiotherapy: implementation and first clinical experience in Iran.

The aim of the study is to evaluate the overall accuracy of the surface-guided radiotherapy (SGRT) workflow through a comprehensive commissioning and quality assurance procedures and assess the potential benefits of deep-inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) radiotherapy as a cardiac and lung dose reduction approach for left-sided breast cancer irradiation. Accuracy and reproducibility of the optical surface scanner used for DIBH treatment were evaluated using different phantoms. Patient positioning accuracy and reproducibility of DIBH treatment were evaluated. Twenty patients were studied for treatment plan quality in target dose coverage and healthy organ sparing for the two different treatment techniques. Reproducibility tests for the surface scanner showed good stability within 1 mm in all directions. The maximum position variation between applied shifts on the couch and the scanner measured offsets is 1 mm in all directions. The clinical study of 200 fractions showed good agreement between the surface scanner and portal imaging with the isocenter position deviation of less than 3 mm in each lateral, longitudinal, and vertical direction. The standard deviation of the DIBH level showed a value of < 2 mm during all evaluated DIBHs. Compared to the free breathing (FB) technique, DIBH showed significant reduction of 48% for heart mean dose, 43% for heart V25, and 20% for ipsilateral lung V20. Surface-guided radiotherapy can be regarded as an accurate tool for patient positioning and monitoring in breast radiotherapy. DIBH treatment are considered to be effective techniques in heart and ipsilateral lung dose reductions for left breast radiotherapy.

Development of Deep Learning Chest X-Ray Model for Cardiac Dose Prediction in Left-Sided Breast Cancer Radiotherapy

<h3>Purpose/Objective(s)</h3> Deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) is widely used to reduce the cardiac dose in left-sided breast cancer radiotherapy. This study aimed to develop a deep learning chest X-ray model for cardiac dose prediction to select patients with a potentially high risk of cardiac irradiation and need for DIBH radiotherapy. <h3>Materials/Methods</h3> We used 103 pairs of anteroposterior and lateral chest X-ray data of left-sided breast cancer patients (training cohort: n = 59, validation cohort: n=19, test cohort: n = 25). All patients underwent breast-conserving surgery followed by DIBH radiotherapy: the treatment plan consisted of two opposing tangential radiation fields. The prescription dose of the planning target volume was 42.56 Gy in 16 fractions. A convolutional neural network-based regression model was developed to predict the mean heart dose (∆MHD) reduction between free-breathing (MHD_FB) and DIBH. The model performance is evaluated as a binary classifier by setting the cutoff value of ∆MHD >1 Gy. <h3>Results</h3> The patient characteristics were as follows: the median (IQR) age was 52 (47–61) years, MHD_FB was 1.75 (1.14–2.47) Gy, and ∆MHD was 1.00 (0.52–1.64) Gy. The classification performance of the developed model showed a sensitivity of 85.7%, specificity of 90.9%, a positive predictive value of 92.3%, a negative predictive value of 83.3%, and a diagnostic accuracy of 88.0%. The AUC value of the ROC curve was 0.864. <h3>Conclusion</h3> The proposed model could predict ∆MHD in breast radiotherapy, suggesting the potential of a classifier in which patients are more desirable for DIBH.

Assessing Acute Cardiac Inflammation after Left-Sided Breast Cancer Radiotherapy with Hybrid PET/MRI (RICT-BREAST)

<h3>Purpose/Objective(s)</h3> The goal of this study is to investigate the utility of hybrid ¹⁸FDG PET/MRI and serial blood work to detect early inflammatory response and cardiac functionality changes at one-month and one-year post radiation therapy (RT) in patients with left-sided breast cancer. <h3>Materials/Methods</h3> Fifteen left-sided breast cancer patients are currently enrolled in the RICT-BREAST study (NCT03748030). Serial imaging with hybrid ¹⁸FDG PET/MRI and blood work was obtained at baseline (before RT), at one-month post RT, and at one-year post RT. The hybrid ¹⁸FDG PET/MR imaging protocol consisted of a sixty-minute list-mode ¹⁸FDG PET scan with prior glucose suppression. Myocardial inflammation was quantified by calculating the change of mean ¹⁸FDG standard uptake (meanSUV_bw) at 40-60 minutes post injection and was grouped based on the supplied artery (left anterior descending (LAD), left circumflex (LC) or right coronary artery (RCA)). MRI assessments, including left ventricle (LV) functional and extracellular volume matrices (ECV), were extracted from T1 (pre and during-constant infusion of gadolinium) and cine images, respectively, and acquired simultaneously during PET acquisition. Cardiac disease and inflammation biomarker measurements of high-sensitivity troponin T (hs-TnT), C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) were compared at each timepoint. <h3>Results</h3> Eleven patients received deep-inspiration breath-hold RT (DIBH-RT), while four patients received free-breathing RT (FB-RT), where 4D-CT simulation was performed to define cardiac motion encompassment. To date, all patients have received hybrid ¹⁸FDG PET/MRI cardiac imaging and bloodwork at baseline and at one month after RT. Two patients have received their one-year follow-up ¹⁸FDG PET/MRI scan and bloodwork. At 1-month follow-up, a significant increase (10%) of ¹⁸FDG/PET myocardial uptake (meanSUV_bw) was detected at LAD territories (p = 0.04). A significant increase in mean ECV, measured with T1-mapping, was observed in slices of the apex (6%) and base (5%) were also detected (p < 0.02). A significant reduction of mean LV stroke volume (-7%) was also identified (p < 0.02). Insignificant changes of all blood work measurements at 1-month follow-up were reported. There was no detectable difference in any cardiac measure between patients who received DIBH-RT and FB-RT. For the two patients who had their one-year follow-ups, an increase in hs-CRP and ESR levels were detected compared to baseline, whereas global reduction of FDG uptake was seen. One patient had an increase of hs-TnT (up to 19ng/L) with left ventricle remodeling reported in echocardiography and a global increase of ECV. <h3>Conclusion</h3> ¹⁸FDG/PET myocardial uptake and functional MR, including SV and ECV were sensitive to changes at 1-month after breast cancer RT with findings suggesting an acute inflammatory response in the heart. One-year median follow-up imaging and bloodwork has been acquired for 2 of 15 patients thus far.

The clinical outcome of postoperative radiotherapy using hybrid planning technique in left breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery.

The purpose of this study is to observe the preliminary clinical outcome and acute toxicity of hybrid intensity modulated radiotherapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy planning technique with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB). From November 2015 to December 2018, 149 female patients with left-side breast cancer who underwent adjuvant radiotherapy with hybrid IMRT and VMAT planning technique with SIB were reviewed retrospectively. The primary endpoint was acute toxicities and the secondary endpoints were local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-freesurvival (DMFS), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). The median age was 52 years old and median follow-up was 43.4months. Eighty-six percent of patients had acute grade 0 to grade1 dermatitis and 14% had grade 2 dermatitis. No acute radiation pneumonitis, esophagitis, or cardiovascular events were recorded during follow-up. The 3-year LRFS, DMFS, DFS, and OS rates were 95.1%, 95.1%, 90.3%, and 97.9%, respectively. The subgroup analysis revealed that patients with lymphovascular invasion had more local recurrence rate and worse DFS rate. Patients with advanced N stage had the trend of worse DMFS. In conclusion, the hybrid IMRT and VMAT technique is feasible, safe and has less acute radiation related toxicities in SIB postoperative radiotherapy for left-sided breast cancer.

Dosimetric evaluation of cardiac and left anterior descending artery dose in patients with left-sided breast cancer treated by different techniques of hypofractionated adjuvant radiotherapy after breast conservative surgery

The aims: to dosimetrically evaluate the dose to the heart and left anterior descending artery in left-sided early breast cases using different techniques.&#x0D; Materials and methods: Prospective observational/analytical study done in cases of left-sided BCS referred for adjuvant RT in 54 patients. Patients who underwent left-sided BCS (breast conservative surgery), patients aged between 18- and 75 years performance status ECOG 0-2, histological confirmed DCIS, Invasive Breast Cancer-Stage 1, 2, 3, patients without any evidence of metastatic disease Irrespective of hormonal receptor and HER-2 neu status are included in the study.&#x0D; Results: All the 3 parameters for LAD showed the highest doses with 3DCRT and lowest with VMAT. Thus our study favoured VMAT (p&lt;0.01) as the planning technique to achieve the least doses of LAD. However, for the heart, there was no statistically significant difference between 3DCRT and IMRT (p=0.349) for the average mean dose (Gy). On the other hand, there was a statistically significant difference between 3DCRT Vs VMAT and IMRT Vs VMAT (95 % CI, p&lt;0.01), again favouring VMAT as the choice of planning technique. The average heart max dose(Gy) and average heart V20(%) showed statistically significant benefits with VMAT (p&lt;0.01). There was a statistically significant benefit (p&lt;0.000) with VMAT for both LV parameters. At the same time, there was a statistically significant benefit in terms of ipsilateral lung dose with VMAT(p&lt;0.000), the dose to the right lung, right breast and favoured 3DCRT (p&lt;0.01). PTV95 % (Gy) by 3DCRT, IMRT, and VMAT in our study is 41.01, 41.96, and 41.76, respectively. Though the difference between the 3 techniques seems meagre, there was a statistically significant difference (p&lt;0.012) favouring IMRT.&#x0D; Conclusion: We conclude that using the VMAT technique in radiotherapy for left-sided breast cancer can significantly reduce radiation doses to the heart and LAD, potentially reducing cardiac risk. For all patients, the cardiac doses are considerably decreased for all dose levels without compromising the dose coverage to PTV, which is an advantage over IMRT and 3DCRT

Accuracy and potential improvements of surface-guided breast cancer radiotherapy in deep inspiration breath-hold with daily image-guidance

Objective. Radiotherapy of left-sided breast cancer in deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) reduces the heart dose. Surface guided radiotherapy (SGRT) can guide the DIBH, but the accuracy is subject to variations in the chest wall position relative to the patient surface. Approach. In this study, ten left-sided breast cancer patients received DIBH radiotherapy with tangential fields in 15–18 fractions. After initial SGRT setup in free breathing an orthogonal MV/kV image pair was acquired during SGRT-guided breath-hold. The couch was corrected to align the chest wall during another breath-hold, and a new SGRT reference surface was acquired for the gating. The chest wall position error during treatment was determined from continuous cine MV images in the imager direction perpendicular to the cranio-caudal direction. A treatment error budget was made with individual contributions from the online registration of the setup MV image, the difference in breath-hold level between setup imaging and SGRT reference surface acquisition, the SGRT level during treatment, and intra-fraction shifts of the chest wall relative to the SGRT reference surface. In addition to the original setup protocol (Scenario A), SGRT was also simulated with better integration of image-guidance by capturing either the new reference surface (Scenario B) or the SGRT positional signal (Scenario C) simultaneously with the setup MV image, and accounting for the image-guided couch correction by shifting the SGRT reference surface digitally. Main results. In general, the external SGRT signal correlated well with the internal chest wall position error (correlation coefficient >0.7 for 75% of field deliveries), but external-to-internal target position offsets above 2 mm occasionally occurred (13% of fractions). The PTV margin required to account for the treatment error was 3.5 mm (Scenario A), 3.4 mm (B), and 3.1 mm (C). Significance. Further integration of SGRT with image-guidance may improve treatment accuracy and workflow although the current study did not show large accuracy improvements of scenario B and C compared to scenario A.

Development of deep learning chest X-ray model for cardiac dose prediction in left-sided breast cancer radiotherapy

Deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) is widely used to reduce the cardiac dose in left-sided breast cancer radiotherapy. This study aimed to develop a deep learning chest X-ray model for cardiac dose prediction to select patients with a potentially high risk of cardiac irradiation and need for DIBH radiotherapy. We used 103 pairs of anteroposterior and lateral chest X-ray data of left-sided breast cancer patients (training cohort: n = 59, validation cohort: n = 19, test cohort: n = 25). All patients underwent breast-conserving surgery followed by DIBH radiotherapy: the treatment plan consisted of three-dimensional, two opposing tangential radiation fields. The prescription dose of the planning target volume was 42.56 Gy in 16 fractions. A convolutional neural network-based regression model was developed to predict the mean heart dose (∆MHD) reduction between free-breathing (MHDFB) and DIBH. The model performance is evaluated as a binary classifier by setting the cutoff value of ∆MHD > 1 Gy. The patient characteristics were as follows: the median (IQR) age was 52 (47–61) years, MHDFB was 1.75 (1.14–2.47) Gy, and ∆MHD was 1.00 (0.52–1.64) Gy. The classification performance of the developed model showed a sensitivity of 85.7%, specificity of 90.9%, a positive predictive value of 92.3%, a negative predictive value of 83.3%, and a diagnostic accuracy of 88.0%. The AUC value of the ROC curve was 0.864. The proposed model could predict ∆MHD in breast radiotherapy, suggesting the potential of a classifier in which patients are more desirable for DIBH.

Deep inspiratory breath-hold radiotherapy for left-sided breast cancer: Initial experience with Active Breathing Coordinator™ in a regional hospital.

Deep inspiratory breath-hold (DIBH) has become standard in radiotherapy for left-sided breast cancer to reduce the heart dose. This study evaluated breath-hold stability and reproducibility using Elekta's Active Breathing Coordinator™ (ABC) and its effectiveness and feasibility in left-sided breast cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy. Eligible patients were planned with free breathing (FB) and DIBH protocols. DIBH treatment was considered if the mean heart dose (MHD) was ≥2 Gy on the FB plan. Those who proceeded with DIBH treatment were enrolled for the pilot study. Electronic portal images of DIBH treatment beams were taken using the movie-exposure mode for breath-hold stability and reproducibility analysis. DIBH effectiveness in heart dose reduction and impact on simulation and treatment durations were compared with FB protocol. Out of 56 eligible patients, 15 proceeded with DIBH treatment. The mean difference of patient setup within a single breath-hold was 0.4 mm; between different breath-holds of the same beam 1.1 mm and between different days 2.6 mm. DIBH reduced the MHD by 47% and the mean left anterior descending artery (LAD) dose by 35%. DIBH took longer time than FB in simulation and treatment. At least 14% of the eligible patients did not tolerate DIBH during simulation. ABC leads to stable and reproducible breath-holds and results in significant heart dose reductions. It may not be tolerated by all patients and has resource implications.

Dosimetric Planning Comparison for Left-Sided Breast Cancer Radiotherapy: The Clinical Feasibility of Four-Dimensional-Computed Tomography-Based Treatment Planning Optimization.

Background: Adjuvant whole-breast radiotherapy (RT) is a significant part of the standard of care treatment after breast cancer (BC) conserving surgery. Modern techniques including intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) have constituted to better target coverage and critical organs sparing. However, BC survivors are at risk of developing radiation-induced cardiac toxicity. Hence, deep-inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) techniques have been implemented at many centers to further reduce cardiac exposure but require compliance. 4D-CT robust optimization can account for heart intrafractional motion per breathing phase. The optimization has been explored in cardiac sparing of breast IMRT compared to DIBH in a small sample size but has not been evaluated in substructures sparing, nor in VMAT. To provide patients who are not compliant to breath-hold with an optimal treatment approach, various heart sparing techniques need to be evaluated for statistical significance and clinical feasibility.Aim: This retrospective study aimed to provide an extensive dosimetric heart sparing comparison of free-breathing, 4D-CT-based treatment planning, including robust optimization with DIBH-based treatment planning. Combinations of forward and inverse IMRT and VMAT are also considered.Methods: Fifteen early stage left-sided BC standard treatment plans were selected. Breast, lung, left anterior descending artery (LAD), left ventricle (LV), and the whole heart were contoured on each 4D-CT phase and DIBH CT dataset. Each treatment plan was optimized using forward/inverse IMRT and VMAT on the following CT datasets: DIBH, average 4D-CT, and the complete 4D-CT dataset needed for robust optimization. Dose-volume histograms were used to compare V5GyHeart, mean heart dose, mean and max LAD dose, mean LV dose, and V50%Lung.Results: All RT techniques assessed including 4D robust optimization were clinically feasible. Statistically significant differences in mean heart, LAD and LV dose, max LAD dose, and V5GyHeart (p < 0.01) but no difference in V50%Lung (p = 0.29) were found between different techniques. IMRT DIBH achieved the optimal cardiac and substructure sparing among treatment plans. 4D robust IMRT had significantly greater mean heart and LV dose than DIBH IMRT (p ≤ 0.01), except LAD dose. Among free-breathing methods, no difference in all cardiac and substructure dose parameters was observed (p > 0.2) in comparing forward and inverse IMRT with average 4D-CT, inverse average 4D-CT, and 4D robust with IMRT, and between average 4D-CT VMAT and 4D robust VMAT. Only V5GyHeart and mean LV dose were significantly greater in 4D robust VMAT (p < 0.01) compared to DIBH VMAT. Mean heart and LV doses were significantly reduced (p < 0.01) in DIBH IMRT compared to DIBH VMAT. Moreover, mean heart and LV dose, V5GyHeart were significantly reduced in inverse IMRT average 4D-CT compared to average 4D-CT VMAT (p < 0.02) and in 4D robust IMRT compared to 4D robust VMAT (p < 0.04).Conclusion: This study demonstrated the clinical feasibility of 4D robust optimization in limiting the cardiac and substructures dose during free-breathing RT with both IMRT/VMAT for patients who are not compliant with breath-hold RT. However, this study also presents that 4D robust optimization can reduce LAD dose but not fully outperform DIBH or conventional 4D-CT-based planning with IMRT/VMAT in heart sparing in treating early staged left-sided BC patients.