Radiostereometric Analysis Research Articles

RSA-tested TKA Implants on Average Have Lower Mean 10-year Revision Rates Than Non-RSA-tested Designs

The number of revisions after TKA is expected to rise because of aging populations in many countries and because patients are undergoing TKA at younger ages. Aseptic loosening is a major reason for late revision, which can be predicted by radiostereometric analysis (RSA) of small groups of patients at 2 years of follow-up. RSA is therefore an ideal tool to assess new TKA designs before they are introduced to the market, although not every TKA design has been studied with RSA. If RSA-tested TKA designs have lower 10-year revision rates in national registries than non-RSA-tested TKA designs, RSA testing of all new designs could be advocated. In this study, we asked: Is there a difference in the all-cause revision rate between non-RSA-tested and RSA-tested TKA designs registered in national knee arthroplasty registries at 5 and 10 years of follow-up? Knee arthroplasty registries were identified through the European Federation of National Associations of Orthopaedics and Traumatology webpage and through a manual internet search. Inclusion criteria were a minimum follow-up duration of 10 years and available revision or survival data per TKA design. Twenty-six registries were identified; seven were included comprising 339 TKA designs, of which 236 designs were classified as RSA-tested and 103 as non-RSA-tested. Six registries were excluded because no report was published. One registry was excluded because no fixation method was mentioned (79 TKA designs). Another registry was excluded because there was no 10-year data available (22 non-RSA-tested designs; 10 RSA-tested designs). Eleven registries were excluded because they did not provide revision rates per design and had not reached 10 years follow-up. The revision rates with their standard errors were extracted per design. We used the data from a recent meta-analysis to identify whether a TKA design was previously tested with RSA. This meta-analysis found 53 RSA studies comprising 70 different TKA designs. The prosthesis model, fixation method and insert type were extracted from these RSA-studies. The design characteristics of the TKA reported in the knee arthroplasty registries were also extracted, and if possible, matched to the TKA designs reported in the RSA-studies. At 5 years of follow-up, 191 TKA designs were identified as non-RSA-tested and 92 were identified as RSA-tested. At 10 years of follow-up, 154 TKA designs and 74 TKA designs were classified as non-RSA-tested and RSA-tested, respectively. A random-effects model using the Metafor Package in R statistics was used to estimate the pooled revision rate at 5 and 10 years of follow-up for both groups. The difference in revision rates between groups at 5 and 10 years of follow-up was estimated by including RSA as a factor in the random-effects model. Mean all-cause revision rates at 5 years for non-RSA-tested and RSA-tested implants were 3.6% (95% CI 3.4 to 3.8) and 2.9% (95% CI 2.7 to 3.0), with a mean difference of 0.6% favoring RSA-tested implants (95% CI 0.4 to 0.8; p < 0.001). Mean all-cause revision rates at 10 years for non-RSA-tested and RSA-tested implants were 5.5% (95% CI 5.2 to 5.9) and 4.4% (95% CI 4.1 to 4.7), with a mean difference of 0.9% favoring RSA-tested implants (95% CI 0.4 to 1.3; p < 0.001). Although there are exceptions, across registries, TKA designs that have been tested in an RSA setting have a slightly lower (about 1%) mean all-cause revision rate at 5-year and 10-year follow-up than those tested in a non-RSA setting. Acknowledging the inherent limitations of this observational study, a risk difference of 1% could potentially translate into an approximate 20% decrease in revision burden up to 10 years, which may have a profound impact on patient morbidity and health-related costs. Level III, therapeutic study.

Bone Mineral Density and Cortical-Bone Thickness of the Distal Radius Predict Femoral Stem Subsidence in Postmenopausal Women

BackgroundThe distal radius is an optional site for evaluation of bone quality in postmenopausal women before cementless total hip arthroplasty. We hypothesized that dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and pulse-echo ultrasonometry of the distal radius may help discriminate subjects at high risk of femoral stem subsidence. MethodsA prospective cohort of postmenopausal women with primary hip osteoarthritis underwent total hip arthroplasty with implantation of a parallel-sided femoral stem. Postoperative stem migration was measured using radiostereometric analysis. Preoperatively, subjects had multisite DXA measurement of bone mineral density (BMD) and pulse-echo ultrasonometry of the cortical-bone thickness. The diagnostic abilities of these methods to discriminate <2 mm and ≥2 mm femoral stem subsidence were tested. ResultsThe accuracy of the distal radius BMD and cortical-bone thickness of the distal radius were moderate (area under the curve, 0.737 and 0.726, respectively) in discriminating between <2 mm and ≥2 mm stem subsidence. Women with low cortical-bone thickness of the radius were more likely (odds ratio = 6.7; P = .002) to develop stem subsidence ≥2 mm. These subjects had lower total hip BMD (P = .007) and reduced thickness of the medial cortex of the proximal femur (P = .048) with lower middle (P < .001) and distal (P = .004) stem-to-canal fill ratios. ConclusionFemoral stem stability and resistance to subsidence are sensitive to adequate bone stock and unaltered anatomy. DXA and pulse-echo ultrasonometry of the distal radius may help discriminate postmenopausal women at high risk of stem subsidence.

Radiostereometric Analysis Of Biceps Tenodesis: A Comparison Of Techniques

Objectives: Arthroscopic biceps tenodesis (BT) is a common surgical procedure for treatment of anterior shoulder pain due to long head of the biceps pathology. BT can be accomplished via several different techniques. There continues to be a paucity of literature comparing the different techniques and fixation devices. The purpose of this study was to compare 4 different techniques for accomplishing a BT utilizing radiostereometric analysis. Methods: This study was a prospectively enrolled non-randomized trial of patients undergoing BT. All patients were treated at a single institution by 1 of 4 surgeons. Four different techniques were analyzed, 1) open BT with screw fixation, 2) open BT with single anchor fixation, 3) arthroscopic BT with screw fixation, and 4) arthroscopic BT with two suture anchor fixation. After the BT was completed a tantalum bead was sewn to the long head of the biceps tendon. This bead acted as a marker of the position of the biceps tendon. X-rays were taken during surgery while the patient remained sedated to establish time zero bead position. Follow up x-rays were completed at the patients 1st post-operative visit and 12 week post-operative visit. Position of the bead was measured at each time point in mm from the proximal most point of the humerus to its position distally. Results: A total of 60 patients were included in the analysis, with 15 patients in each of the 4 groups. Final bead position differed significantly for the open and arthroscopic techniques (107.35±20.39mm, 65.64±23.69mm, p&lt;0.001), but did not differ significantly between the two open techniques and the two arthroscopic technique (p&gt;0.05). The open technique resulted in 7.69±5.98mm of distal migration while the arthroscopic technique resulted in a similar amount of distal migration, 8.93±2.71mm. Conclusion: Short-term radiographic outcomes following open and arthroscopic biceps tenodesis revealed that each technique results in stable fixation of the tendon with minimal migration. Although a statistically significant migration occurred, this is likely clinically insignificant. This initial migration observed could be due to increased tensioning of the tendon when the patient is awake versus sedated.

CORR Insights®: Are There Differences in Micromotion on Radiostereometric Analysis Between Bicruciate- and Cruciate-retaining Designs in TKA? A Randomized Controlled Trial.

CORR Insights®: Are There Differences in Micromotion on Radiostereometric Analysis Between Bicruciate- and Cruciate-retaining Designs in TKA? A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Accuracy of EBRA-cup measurements after reconstruction of severe acetabular defects at revision THR.

Radiostereometric analysis (RSA) is the most accurate method of measuring component migration using radiographs but is restricted to use in prospective studies. Ein-Bild-Roentgen-analyze (EBRA)-Cup can be used retrospectively, but its accuracy to measure component migration following revision is unknown. This study aimed to determine the accuracy of EBRA-Cup measurements of uncemented acetabular component migration after revision total hip replacement (THR). The secondary aim was to compare the number of cases identified using EBRA-Cup and RSA as having proximally migrated above and below 1 mm at 2 years postoperatively. EBRA-Cup measurements were performed on plain antero-posterior pelvic radiographs taken at the same time as RSA radiographs in a prospective cohort of 53 hips undergoing acetabular revision. At 2 years, the mean difference between the RSA and EBRA-Cup measurements for 17 components used to treat pelvic discontinuity was 0.90 mm, significantly greater than the mean difference of 0.28 mm for 36 components without discontinuity (P = .0001). The mean difference between the RSA and EBRA-Cup measurements at 2 years for hips that were reconstructed with an acetabular component alone, 0.28 mm, was significantly lower than hips that were reconstructed with an acetabular component in combination with an augment and/or cage, 0.74 mm (P = .0005). In conclusion, EBRA-Cup can accurately measure migration of uncemented acetabular components used at revision THR. The presence of pelvic discontinuity, and addition of augments and cages, significantly influenced the accuracy of EBRA-Cup measurements. EBRA-Cup and RSA had good agreement on classification of components that migrated proximally above or below 1 mm at 2 years, with 100% sensitivity, and 87% specificity.

Validation of an automated shape-matching algorithm for biplane radiographic spine osteokinematics and radiostereometric analysis error quantification.

Biplane radiography and associated shape-matching provides non-invasive, dynamic, 3D osteo- and arthrokinematic analysis. Due to the complexity of data acquisition, each system should be validated for the anatomy of interest. The purpose of this study was to assess our system’s acquisition methods and validate a custom, automated 2D/3D shape-matching algorithm relative to radiostereometric analysis (RSA) for the cervical and lumbar spine. Additionally, two sources of RSA error were examined via a Monte Carlo simulation: 1) static bead centroid identification and 2) dynamic bead tracking error. Tantalum beads were implanted into a cadaver for RSA and cervical and lumbar spine flexion and lateral bending were passively simulated. A bead centroid identification reliability analysis was performed and a vertebral validation block was used to determine bead tracking accuracy. Our system’s overall root mean square error (RMSE) for the cervical spine ranged between 0.21–0.49mm and 0.42–1.80° and the lumbar spine ranged between 0.35–1.17mm and 0.49–1.06°. The RMSE associated with RSA ranged between 0.14–0.69mm and 0.96–2.33° for bead centroid identification and 0.25–1.19mm and 1.69–4.06° for dynamic bead tracking. The results of this study demonstrate our system’s ability to accurately quantify segmental spine motion. Additionally, RSA errors should be considered when interpreting biplane validation results.

Low-dose CT-based implant motion analysis is a precise tool for early migration measurements of hip cups: a clinical study of 24 patients

Background and purpose — Early implant migration is known to be a predictive factor of clinical loosening in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Radiostereometric analysis (RSA) is the gold standard used to measure early migration in patients. However, RSA requires costly, specialized imaging equipment and the image process is complex. We determined the precision of an alternative, commercially available, CT method in 3 ongoing clinical THA studies, comprising 3 different cups.Materials and methods — 24 CT double examinations of 24 hip cups were selected consecutively from 3 ongoing prospective studies: 2 primary THA (1 cemented and 1 uncemented) and 1 THA (cemented) revision study. Precision of the CT-based implant motion analysis (CTMA) system was calculated separately for each study, using both the surface anatomy of the pelvis and metal beads placed in the pelvis.Results — For the CTMA analysis using the surface anatomy of the pelvis, the precision ranged between 0.07 and 0.31 mm in translation and 0.20° and 0.39° for rotation, respectively. For the CTMA analysis using beads the precision ranged between 0.08 and 0.20 mm in translation and between 0.20° and 0.43° for rotations. The radiation dose ranged between 0.2 and 2.3 mSv.Interpretation — CTMA achieved a clinically relevant and consistent precision between the 3 different hip cups studied. The use of different hip cup types, different CT scanners, or registration method (beads or surface anatomy) had no discernible effect on precision. Therefore, CTMA without the use of bone markers could potentially be an alternative to RSA to measure early migration.

Radiostereometric Analysis of Stability and Inducible Micromotion After Locked Lateral Plating of Distal Femur Fractures.

To evaluate interfragmentary motion over 1 year after distal femoral fracture fixation using radiostereometric analysis (RSA). The secondary aim was to assess whether RSA data are consistent with diagnoses of nonunion. Prospective cohort study. Level I urban trauma center. Sixteen patients between 22 and 89 years of age with distal femoral fracture (OTA/AO type 33). All fractures were treated with a lateral locking plate, and tantalum markers were inserted into the main proximal and distal fracture fragments. RSA was performed at 2, 6, 12, 18, and 52 weeks postoperatively. Both unloaded and loaded RSA measurements were performed. Unloaded fracture migration over time and inducible micromotion at the fracture site in the coronal plane were determined at each follow-up interval. RSA precision in the coronal plane of interfragmentary motion over time and inducible micromotion were 1.2 and 0.9 mm in the coronal plane, respectively. Two cases required revision surgery for nonunion 1 year postoperatively. For cases of union, unloaded fracture migration stopped being detectable between 12 and 18 weeks, and inducible micromotion was no longer detectable by the 12-week visit. For cases of nonunion, both unloaded migration and inducible micromotion were detected throughout the study period. RSA may be used to reliably assess distal femoral fracture healing. RSA revealed differences in cases of union and nonunion by 3 months and more consistently than traditional x-rays. Diagnostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Are Short-Stem Femoral Components a Viable Option in Total Hip Arthroplasty?: Commentary on an article by Janus D. Christiansen, MD, PhD, et al.: "An Ultra-Short Femoral Neck-Preserving Hip Prosthesis. A 2-Year Follow-up Study with Radiostereometric Analysis and Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry in a Stepwise Introduction".

Are Short-Stem Femoral Components a Viable Option in Total Hip Arthroplasty?: Commentary on an article by Janus D. Christiansen, MD, PhD, et al.: "An Ultra-Short Femoral Neck-Preserving Hip Prosthesis. A 2-Year Follow-up Study with Radiostereometric Analysis and Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry in a Stepwise Introduction".

Early stabilization of the uncemented Symax hip stem in a 2-year RSA study

Background and purpose — The uncemented Symax hip stem has shown early proximal ingrowth as result of the BONIT-hydroxyapatite (HA) coating and the distal DOTIZE surface treatment. We evaluated 2-year postoperative radiostereometric analysis (RSA) migration of the Symax hip stem in THA patients. We also investigated the correlation between migration at 4 weeks and clinical outcomes after 2 years.Patients and methods — Patients in a 2-year clinical follow-up single-centre RSA randomized controlled trial were randomized to 2 different cup designs. All 45 patients received a Symax hip stem. RSA migration patterns of the Symax hip stem is presented here as a single cohort. RSA examinations were performed postoperatively, but before weight-bearing, and subsequently after 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. Clinical outcomes and radiographic evaluations were assessed 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively.Results — During the first 4 weeks, the Symax hip stem subsided, rotated into retroversion, and translated posteriorly, after which the migration ceased and the prosthesis stabilized. All clinical outcomes improved from preoperatively to 2 years. There was no clinically or statistically significant correlation between subsidence and retroversion at 4 weeks and clinical outcomes after 2 years.Interpretation — RSA evaluation of the uncemented Symax hip stem confirms that the design principles and coating properties lead to early stabilization of the stem, as early as 4 weeks postoperatively. There was no correlation between subsidence and retroversion at 4 weeks and clinical outcomes after 2 years. Based on the predictive potential of the RSA technique, we anticipate excellent long-term survival of this hip stem.

The Use of Porous Titanium Coating and the Largest Possible Head Do Not Affect Early Cup Fixation: A 2-Year Report from a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background:Cups are more frequently revised than stems after uncemented total hip arthroplasty, which warrants the development of cup surfaces that provide long-lasting, stable fixation. Large heads have become popular with the aim of reducing dislocation rates, but they generate greater frictional torque that may compromise cup fixation. We aimed to investigate (1) if a novel porous titanium surface provides superior cup fixation when compared with a porous plasma spray (PPS) surface and (2) if the use of the largest possible head compromises cup fixation when compared with a 32-mm head.Methods:Ninety-six patients were randomized to receive either a cup with a porous titanium coating (PTC) or a cup with PPS. A second randomization was performed to either the largest possible (36 to 44-mm) or a 32-mm head in metal-on-vitamin-E-infused polyethylene bearings. Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis (RSA) examinations were obtained postoperatively at 3, 12, and 24 months. The primary outcome was proximal cup migration when comparing the 2 cup surfaces and also when comparing the largest possible head with the 32-mm head. The patients were followed for 2 years.Results:The median (and interquartile range) proximal cup migration was 0.15 mm (0.02 to 0.32 mm) for the PTC cup and 0.21 mm (0.11 to 0.34 mm) for the PPS cup. The largest possible head had a proximal cup migration of 0.15 mm (0.09 to 0.31 mm), and the 32-mm head had a proximal cup migration of 0.20 mm (0.04 to 0.35 mm). There were no significant differences between the cup surface (p = 0.378) or the head size (p = 0.693) groups.Conclusions:Early cup fixation was not superior with the novel PTC cup; the use of the largest possible head (36 to 44 mm) did not compromise early cup fixation.Level of Evidence:Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The Watershed Line of the Distal Radius: Cadaveric and Imaging Study of Anatomical Landmarks.

Background Placement of volar plates remains a challenge as the watershed line may not be an easy-identifiable distinct line intraoperatively. Objectives The main objective of this article is to define how anatomical landmarks identifiable upon the volar surgical approach to the distal radius relate to the watershed line. Methods We identified anatomical landmarks macroscopically upon standard volar approach to the distal radius in 10 cadaveric forearms and marked these with radiostereometric analysis (RSA) beads in cadaveric wrists. The RSA beads were then referenced against the volar osseous structures using quantification of three-dimensional computed tomography and advanced imaging software. Results The mean measurements were the radial and ulnar prominences 11.1 mm and 2.1 mm proximal to the joint line of the distal radius, respectively. The interfossa sulcus was 0.3 mm proximal and 3 mm dorsal to the ulnar prominence. The watershed line was between 3.5 (minimal) and 7.6 (maximal) mm distal to the distal line of insertion of the pronator quadratus. Conclusion The watershed line is situated distal to the pronator quadratus, but with a wide variability making it an impractical landmark for plate position. The osseous ulnar prominence is a good anatomical reference for safe plate positioning, as it is located on the watershed line and easily palpated at surgery. One should keep in mind the sulcus-the point on the watershed line where the flexor pollicis longus runs-can be situated just proximal to the ulnar prominence. Clinical Relevance To provide anatomical landmarks that are easy to identify upon surgical approach without the direct need for intraoperative imaging.

Are There Differences in Micromotion on Radiostereometric Analysis Between Bicruciate and Cruciate-retaining Designs in TKA? A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Bicruciate-retaining TKA has been proposed to improve clinical outcomes by maintaining intrinsic ACL function. However, because the unique design of the bicruciate-retaining tibial component precludes a tibial stem, fixation may be compromised. A radiostereometric analysis permits an evaluation of early migration of tibial components in this setting, but to our knowledge, no such analysis has been performed. We performed a randomized controlled trial using a radiostereometric analysis and asked, at 2 years: (1) Is there a difference in tibial implant migration between the bicruciate-retaining and cruciate-retaining TKA designs? In a secondary analysis, we asked: (2) Is there a difference in patient-reported outcomes (Oxford Knee Score [OKS] and Forgotten Joint Score [FJS] between the bicruciate-retaining and cruciate-retaining TKA designs? (3) What is the frequency of reoperations and revisions for the bicruciate-retaining and cruciate-retaining TKA designs? This parallel-group trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01966848) randomized 50 patients with an intact ACL who were eligible to undergo TKA to receive either a bicruciate-retaining or cruciate-retaining TKA. Patients were blinded to treatment allocation. The primary outcome was the maximum total point motion (MTPM) of the tibial component measured with model-based radiostereometric analysis (RSA) at 2 years postoperatively. The MTPM is a translation vector defined as the point in the RSA model that has the greatest combined translation in x-, y- and z-directions. A 1-year postoperative mean MTPM value of 1.6 mm has been suggested as a threshold for unacceptable increased risk of aseptic loosening after both 5 and 10 years. The repeatability of the MTPM was found to be 0.26 mm in our study. Patient-reported outcome measures were assessed preoperatively and at 2 years postoperatively with the OKS (scale of 0-48, worst-best) and FJS (scale of 0-100, worst-best). Baseline characteristics did not differ between groups. At 2 years postoperatively, RSA images were available for 22 patients who underwent bicruciate-retaining and 23 patients who underwent cruciate-retaining TKA, while patient-reported outcome measures were available for 24 patients in each group. The study was powered to detect a 0.2-mm difference in MTPM between groups (SD = 0.2, significance level = 5%, power = 80%). With the numbers available, we found no difference in MTPM between the bicruciate-retaining and cruciate-retaining groups. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) MTPM was 0.52 mm (0.35 to 1.02) and 0.42 mm (0.34 to 0.70) in the bicruciate-retaining and cruciate-retaining groups, respectively (p = 0.63). There was no difference in the magnitude of improvement in the OKS from preoperatively to 2 years postoperative between the groups (median delta [IQR] for bicruciate-retaining 18 [14 to 23] versus cruciate-retaining 18 [15 to 21], difference of medians 0; p = 0.96). Likewise, there was no difference in the magnitude of improvement in the FJS score from preoperatively to 2 years postoperative between the groups (mean ± SD for bicruciate-retaining 46 ± 32 versus cruciate-retaining 48 ± 16, mean difference, 2; p = 0.80). Three patients in the bicruciate-retaining group underwent arthroscopically assisted manipulation at 3 to 4 months postoperatively, and one patient in the bicruciate-retaining group sustained a tibial island fracture during primary surgery and underwent a revision procedure after 6 months. There were no reoperations or revisions in the cruciate-retaining group. With the numbers available, we found no differences between the bicruciate-retaining and the cruciate-retaining implants in terms of stable fixation on RSA or patient-reported outcome measure scores at 2 years, and must therefore recommend against the routine clinical use of the bicruciate-retaining device. The complications we observed with the bicruciate-retaining device suggest it has an associated learning curve and the associated risks of novelty with no demonstrable benefit to the patient; it is also likely to be more expensive in most centers. Continued research on this implant should only be performed in the context of controlled trials. Level II, therapeutic study.

How best to regulate new implants in the market—is radiostereometric analysis enough?

The demands of the modern patient, both in terms of what a hip replacement will allow them to do as well as for how long it will last, mean that pre-market testing and close surveillance should be robust to avoid the problems of previous implants. Implants that fail in the short-term are relatively easy to detect. Implants that fail in the medium to long-term, but sooner or in more damaging modes than their peers, are much more difficult to identify. What would be the optimal strategy to evaluate a new implant prior to release if time and resource was unlimited? Would the new implant only be released to all surgeons after careful introduction in a small cohort with detailed assessment and extended follow-up? How long is sufficient follow-up?

Migration and Wear of a Dual Mobility Acetabular Construct at 3 Years Measured by Radiostereometric Analysis

BackgroundThe anatomic dual mobility (ADM) acetabular component was introduced because of previously described low dislocation rates for this type of construct. The shape of the anatomic cup and the motion of polyethylene liner may have implications for acetabular cup fixation and polyethylene liner wear; therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess the migration patterns and wear rates of the ADM component using radiostereometric analysis. MethodsUncemented ADM acetabular components were implanted in 27 patients. Radiostereometric analysis exams were taken at 6 follow-up visits over 3 years. Proximal translation and sagittal rotation of the cup and polyethylene total wear and wear rates were calculated. Oxford 12 Hip scores and satisfaction were recorded. ResultsMean proximal translation was below the 0.2 mm threshold at 2 years associated with acceptable long-term survivorship (0.16 mm [standard deviation {SD} 0.31] at 3 years). Mean sagittal rotation was 0.29 degrees (SD 1.03) and was greater in female subjects (P < .001). Following bedding-in, the annual wear rate was 0.02 mm/y, below the 0.1 mm/y threshold. There was no association between cup migration and polyethylene wear. Patient satisfaction at 3 years was 96%. Mean Oxford 12 Hip scores improved from 21 (SD 7) preoperatively to 43 (SD 7) 3 years postoperatively. ConclusionsThe ADM cup demonstrated stable migration at 3 years indicating low risk for aseptic loosening. Bedding-in in the first year was followed by low annual wear rates. These finding suggest no increased risk of the dual mobility and anatomic design on fixation or wear.

Similar patient positioning: A key factor in follow-up studies when using model-based radiostereometric analysis of the hip

IntroductionDespite protocols, patients are not positioned exactly alike at radiostereometric (RSA) follow-up examinations, and it is unknown how much variation is tolerable. We report precision for optimal and extreme position differences from a phantom hip-study, and clinical precision of hip-RSA. MethodsA femoral stem with 3 bead-towers was fixed in a saw bone with bone-markers (phantom), and series of RSA examinations within optimal (5 × 5 cm and 5°) and extreme (20 × 30 cm and 30°) phantom positions were obtained. Double-examination RSA of 12 patients with the same femoral stem type were analyzed. Both model-based (CAD) and marker-based (MM) analysis was used. Precision was reported as standard deviation of differences. ResultsPrecision for translations in the optimal and extreme phantom position were below 0.06 mm and 0.02 mm for MM analysis, and below 0.05 mm and 0.18 mm for CAD analysis, respectively. Precision for rotations in the optimal and extreme phantom rotation were below 0.18° and 0.26° for MM analysis, and below 0.34° and 0.52° for CAD analysis, respectively. Clinical precision was 0.29 mm and 0.44° for MM analysis, and 0.40 mm and 1.59° for CAD analysis. ConclusionExtreme differences in patient position during RSA examination negatively affects precision, and CAD model-analysis was more sensitive than MM analysis. Longitudinal translation and rotation about the long stem-axis are the effect parameters which are most affected by position and rotation changes, and also the best indicators of implant loosening. Implications for practiceBased on our research, we recommend that similar patient positioning between follow-up RSA examinations is debated and prioritized.

Accuracy and precision of a CT method for assessing migration in shoulder arthroplasty: an experimental study.

Radiostereometric analysis (RSA) is the gold standard to measure early implant migration which is a predictive factor for implant survival. To validate an alternative computed tomography (CT) technique to measure implant migration in shoulder arthroplasty. A cadaver proximal humerus and a scapula, which had tantalum beads incorporated within them, were prepared to accept a short-stemmed humeral component and a two-pegged glenoid component of a commercial total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) system. A five degree of freedom micrometer and goniometer equipped rig was used to translate and rotate the implant components relative to the respective bone to predetermined positions. Double CT examinations were performed for each position and CT motion analysis software (CTMA) was used to assess these movements. The accuracy and precision of the software was estimated using the rig's micrometers and goniometers as the gold standard. The technique's effective dose was also assessed. The accuracy was in the range of 0.07-0.23 mm in translation and 0.22-0.71° in rotation. The precision was in the range of 0.08-0.15 mm in translation and 0.23-0.54° in rotation. The mean effective dose for the CT scans was calculated to be 0.27 mSv. In this experimental setting, accuracy, precision, and effective dose of the CTMA technique were found to be comparable to that of RSA. Therefore, we believe clinical studies are warranted to determine if CTMA is a suitable alternative to traditional RSA for migration measurements in TSA.

Long-term in vivo wear of different bearing types used for the Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Replacement.

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to determine the polyethylene wear rate of Phase 3 Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Replacement bearings and to investigate the effects of resin type and manufacturing process.MethodsA total of 63 patients with at least ten years’ follow-up with three bearing types (1900 resin machined, 1050 resin machined, and 1050 resin moulded) were recruited. Patients underwent full weight-bearing model-based radiostereometric analysis to determine the bearing thickness. The linear wear rate was estimated from the change in thickness divided by the duration of implantation.ResultsThe wear rate for 1900 resin machined (n = 19), 1050 machined (n = 21), and 1050 moulded bearings (n = 23) were 60 µm/year (sd 42), 76 µm/year (sd 32), and 57 µm/year (sd 30), respectively. There was no significant difference between 1900 machined and 1050 machined (p = 0.20), but 1050 moulded had significantly less wear than the 1050 machined (p = 0.05). Increasing femoral (p < 0.001) and tibial (p < 0.001) component size were associated with increasing wear.ConclusionWear rate is similar with 1050 and 1900 resin, but lower with moulded bearings than machined bearings. The currently used Phase 3 bearings wear rate is low (1050 moulded, 57 µm/year), but higher than the previously reported Phase 2 bearings (1900 moulded, 20 µm/year). This is unlikely to be due to the change in polyethylene but may relate to the minimally invasive approach used with the Phase 3. This approach, as well as improving function and thus increasing activity levels, may increase the risk of surgical errors, such as impingement or bearing overhang, which can increase wear. Surgeons should aim to use 4 mm thick bearings rather than 3 mm thick bearings in young patients, unless they are small and need conservative bone resections.Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2019;8:535–543.

In vivo wear measurement in a modern total knee arthroplasty with model-based radiostereometric analysis.

A retrospective study was conducted to measure short-term in vivo linear and volumetric wear of polyethylene (PE) inserts in 101 total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients using model-based radiostereometric analysis (MBRSA). Nonweightbearing supine RSA exams were performed postoperatively and at six, 12, and 24 months. Weightbearing standing RSA exams were performed on select patients at 12 and 24 months. Wear was measured both linearly (joint space) and volumetrically (digital model overlap) at each available follow-up. Precision of both methods was assessed by comparing double RSA exams. Patient age, sex, body mass index, and Oxford Knee Scores were analyzed for any association with PE wear. Linear wear occurred at 0.015 mm/year (supine) and 0.220 mm/year (standing). Volumetric wear occurred at 10.3 mm3/year (supine) and 39.3 mm3/year (standing). Wear occurred primarily on the medial side of the joint. Weightbearing imaging greatly improved the reliability of measurement. Clinical precision of volumetric wear was 34 mm3. No significant associations were found between patient demographics or function scores and measured wear. In vivo volumetric wear of TKAs can be assessed at short-term follow-up using MBRSA. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:1348-1355.

Long-term migration characteristics of the Corail hydroxyapatite-coated femoral stem: a 14-year radiostereometric analysis follow-up study.

The magnitude and pattern of acceptable long-term migration of cementless femoral stems are not well understood. The Corail hydroxyapatite-coated cementless stem is a clinically successful and commonly used femoral stem with a long-term migration pattern not previously described in the literature. The aim of this study was to assess the long-term migration of the Corail hydroxyapatite-coated cementless stem using radiostereometric analysis (RSA) at 14-year follow-up, thereby establishing a benchmark acceptable long-term migration pattern for hydroxyapatite-coated cementless prostheses. A prospective cohort of 29 patients (30 hips) undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty for primary hip osteoarthritis were enrolled into a study to characterise the migration of the Corail cementless stem. A total of 13 patients (4 males, 9 females) with mean age 82 (range 68-92) underwent repeat RSA radiographs at minimum 10years post-operation (mean 13.9years, range 13.3-14.4). Subsidence of the stem was measured and compared to prior measurements taken at 6months and 1, 2, and 6years. None of the 13 patients have been revised. The migration at 6months, 1year, 2years, and 6years has been previously recorded. At mean 14-year follow-up, the cohort mean subsidence of the cementless stem was 0.70mm (range - 0.06 to 3.61mm). For each stem followed up at 6months and 14years, the mean subsidence over this period was 0.05mm (range - 0.14 to 0.57mm). There is no significant difference in mean subsidence at 6months and 14years (p = 0.43). The long-term pattern of the subsidence of the Corail femoral stem has not previously been described. Subsidence occurs within the first 6months, after which there is persistent stabilisation of the implant to 14years. This study provides a description of a long-term acceptable migration pattern to which new hydroxyapatite-coated cementless prostheses may be compared. II.