Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background Oral anticoagulation (OAC) is essential for patients (pts) at high risk for thromboembolism. However,uninterrupted anticoagulation and bridging with enoxaparin increases the risk of pocket hematoma (PH) andinfection (I). Aim To evaluate the impact of OAC in the rate of PH and outcomes in pts undergoing lead extraction (LE) usingthe Pisa Technique (PT). Methods A single centre prospective study of consecutive procedures (Pr) of LE using the PT between February2013 and October 2019. Demographic, clinical, device and procedure related variables, morbidity and mortality(M) data were compared between pts without OAC (O0) and pts with AC (O1). Results 320 electrodes (E) were removed in a total 171 Pr in 159 pts (mean age - 67.7 years, mean LVEF - 48%,male - 72%). The LE were from the following implanted systems: pacemaker – 110 pts, cardiac resynchronizationtherapy – 29 pts, cardioverter-defibrillator – 20 pts. The radiological success rate was 91.2% and the clinicalsuccess rate was 98.3%. There were 14 cases of PH. During a mean follow-up (FU) of 33 months, 11 pts had toundergo a new Pr, 5 of them due to pocket I. 8 pts (5.0%) died during hospital stay, and 19 pts during the firstyear post-Pr. There were no deaths during the Pr. O1 included 56 pts (35.4%), of which 51.9% were under vitaminK antagonists (AVK) and 48.1% under direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC). 11 pts were receiving OAC due toprosthetic mechanical valve, and the remainder due to atrial fibrillation (AF). Pts in O1 were significantly older(p=0.026), presented a lower LVEF (p=0.001), a higher prevalence of valvular heart disease - VHD -(p=0.002),overt heart failure (p=0.006), AF (p<0.001) and previous cardiac surgery - CS - (p<0.001). OAC was associatedwith a higher rate of PH (OR 2,44, IC 95% 1.02-5,84, p=0.046) and pts with PH presented a significantlyprolonged hospital stay (22.7 vs 9.8 days, p=0.031). These pts also presented a higher hospitalization rate duringthe first year post-Pr (OR 2,48, IC95% 1.27-4.88, p=0.009). There was no difference in all-cause hospital M(p=0.522), all-cause M during first year of follow-up (p=0.551) or need for reintervention (p=0.375). Among pts inO1, pts under AVK presented a significantly higher rate of PH (OR 18,67, IC95% 2,23-156,17, p=0.007). Conclusion Pts receiving OAC, particularly pts under AVK, presented a higher rate of PH after LE. PerioperativeOAC management is crucial to reduce the morbidity rate in this population.
Read full abstract