Radiographic Osteoarthritis Research Articles

Neuropathic Pain Associated With First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Osteoarthritis: Frequency and Associated Factors.

To determine whether neuropathic pain is a feature of first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint osteoarthritis (OA). A total of 98 participants (mean ± SD age 57.4 ± 10.3 years) with symptomatic radiographic first MTP joint OA completed the PainDETECT questionnaire (PD-Q), which has 9 questions regarding the intensity and quality of pain. The likelihood of neuropathic pain was determined using established PD-Q cutoff points. Participants with unlikely neuropathic pain were then compared to those with possible/likely neuropathic pain in relation to age, sex, general health (Short Form 12 [SF-12] health survey), psychological well-being (Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale), pain characteristics (self-efficacy, duration, and severity), foot health (Foot Health Status Questionnaire [FHSQ]), first MTP dorsiflexion range of motion, and radiographic severity. Effect sizes (Cohen's d coefficient) were also calculated. A total of 30 (31%) participants had possible/likely neuropathic pain (19 possible [19.4%], 11 likely [11.2%]). The most common neuropathic symptoms were sensitivity to pressure (56%), sudden pain attacks/electric shocks (36%) and burning (24%). Compared to those with unlikely neuropathic pain, those with possible/likely neuropathic pain were significantly older (d=0.59, P=0.010), had worse SF-12 physical scores (d=1.10, P < 0.001), pain self-efficacy scores (d=0.98, P < 0.001), FHSQ pain scores (d=0.98, P < 0.001), and FHSQ function scores (d=0.82, P < 0.001), and had higher pain severity at rest (d=1.01, P < 0.001). A significant proportion of individuals with first MTP joint OA report symptoms suggestive of neuropathic pain, which may partly explain the suboptimal responses to commonly used treatments for this condition. Screening for neuropathic pain may be useful in the selection of targeted interventions and may improve clinical outcomes.

Radiographic Incidence of Knee Osteoarthritis After Isolated ACL Reconstruction Versus Combined ACL and ALL Reconstruction: A Prospective Matched Study From the SANTI Study Group

Background: Combined anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) and anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALLR) have demonstrated reduced risk of graft rerupture as compared with isolated ACLR. However, concerns remain that the risk of osteoarthritis (OA) may be increased by the addition of ALLR. Purpose/Hypothesis: The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of OA with isolated ACLR in comparison with ACLR + ALLR at medium-term follow-up. We hypothesized that there would be no differences between the groups. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Patients who underwent ACLR + ALLR with hamstring tendon autograft between January 2011 and March 2012 were propensity matched to patients who underwent isolated ACLR with bone–patellar tendon–bone (BPTB) or hamstring tendon autograft in the same period. Medium-term radiographic evaluation was performed using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) radiographic OA grading scale, modified Kellgren-Lawrence grade, and the surface fit method to assess percentage of joint space narrowing. Clinical outcomes were assessed with the following measures: IKDC, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Lysholm, Tegner, and ACL Return to Sport after Injury. Results: A total of 80 patients (42 ACLR + ALLR and 38 isolated ACLR) were analyzed with a mean follow-up of 104 months. There was no significant difference between groups for joint space narrowing in the medial or lateral tibiofemoral or lateral patellofemoral (PF) compartment. However, 36.8% in the isolated ACLR group versus 11.9% in the ACLR + ALLR group had narrowing of the medial PF compartment (P = .0118). A lateral meniscal tear increased the risk of lateral tibiofemoral narrowing by nearly 5 times (odds ratio, 4.9; 95% CI, 1.547-19.367; P = .0123). The risk of medial PF narrowing was >4-fold with an isolated ACLR (odds ratio, 4.8; 95% CI, 1.44-19.05; P = .0179). Between the isolated ACLR group and the ACLR + ALLR group, the secondary meniscectomy rate was 13.2% versus 11.9% (not significantly different). There was no difference between groups in KOOS, Tegner, or IKDC scores. There was also no difference between groups for grades of osteoarthritic change for any classification system. Patients who received a BPTB graft had medial PF joint narrowing in 66.7% of cases as compared with 11.9% in those who received ACLR + ALLR (P = 0.118). Conclusion: ACLR + ALLR did not increase the risk of OA in the lateral tibiofemoral compartment when compared with an isolated ACLR at medium-term follow-up. Isolated ACLR using BPTB was associated with a significantly increased risk of medial PF joint space narrowing. Registration: NCT05123456 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

Hip geometric parameters are associated with radiographic and clinical hip osteoarthritis: findings from a cross-sectional study in uk biobank

Hip geometric parameters are associated with radiographic and clinical hip osteoarthritis: findings from a cross-sectional study in uk biobank

Radiographic OA, bone marrow lesions, higher body mass index and medial meniscal root tears are significantly associated with medial meniscus extrusion with OA or medial meniscal tears: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Medial meniscus extrusion (MME) refers to the protrusion of the medial meniscus beyond the tibial edge by more than 3mm, leading to a deficiency of the hoop strain. MME commonly occurs in conjunction with osteoarthritis (OA) or medial meniscal tears (MMT). However, factors associated with concomitant MME in patients with OA or MMT have not been systematically reviewed. This study aims to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify factors associated with concomitant MME in OA or MMT. The systematic review of the literature was performed according to PRISMA. A literature search was conducted in 4 databases. All original human studies that reported the available evidence on factors associated with concomitant MME in patients with OA or MMT were included. Pooled binary variables were analyzed by odds ratios (OR) and 95% CIs, and pooled continuous variables were evaluated by mean difference (MD) and 95% CIs. Ten studies on OA (5993 patients) and eight studies on MMT (872 patients) met the inclusion criteria. The overall pooled incidence of MME was 43% (95% CI, 37-50%) for OA, 61% (95% CI 43-77%) for MMT, and 85% (95% CI 72-94%) for medial meniscal root tears (MMRT). For the population with OA, Factors significantly associated with MME included radiographic OA [OR 4.24; 95% CI 3.07-5.84; P < 0.0001], bone marrow lesions [OR, 3.35; 95% CI 1.61-6.99; P = 0.0013], cartilage damage [OR, 3.25; 95% CI 1.60-6.61; P = 0.0011], and higher body mass index (BMI) [MD, 1.81; 95% CI 1.15-2.48; P < 0.0001]. Factors strongly associated with increased risk of MME for MMT included medial meniscal root [OR, 8.39; 95% CI 2.84-24.82; P < 0.0001] and radial tears [OR, 2.64; 95% CI 1.18-5.92; P < 0.0001]. Radiographic OA, bone marrow lesions, cartilage damage, and higher BMI were significantly associated with concomitant MME with OA. Furthermore, medial meniscal root and radial tears were significantly associated with an increased risk of MME in patients with MMT. IV.

Assessment of joint line obliquity and its related frontal deformity using long-standing radiographs

PurposeTo investigate how radiographic techniques and osteoarthritis grade influence measurements of knee joint line obliquity (KJLO) and KJLO-related frontal deformity, and to propose preferable KJLO measurement methods. MethodsForty patients with symptomatic medial knee osteoarthritis indicated for high tibial osteotomy were assessed. Measurements were compared between single-leg and double-leg standing radiographs for KJLO measurement methods including joint line orientation angle by femoral condyles (JLOAF), joint line orientation angle by middle knee joint space (JLOAM), joint line orientation angle by tibial plateau (JLOAT), Mikulicz joint line angle (MJLA) and medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), as well as KJLO-related frontal deformity parameters including joint line convergence angle (JLCA), knee ankle joint angle (KAJA) and hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA). Influences of bipedal distance in double-leg standing and osteoarthritis grade on the above measurements were analysed. Measurement reliability was evaluated by intraclass correlation coefficient. ResultsFrom single-leg to double-leg standing radiographs MPTA and KAJA did not change significantly, whereas the other measurements showed significant changes: JLOAF, JLOAM and JLOAT decreased 0.88°, 1.24° and 1.77°, MJLA and JLCA decreased 0.63° and 0.85°, and HKA increased 1.11° (p < 0.05). Bipedal distance in double-leg standing radiographs moderately correlated with JLOAF, JLOAM and JLOAT (rp = −0.555, −0.574 and −0.549). Osteoarthritis grade moderately correlated with JLCA in single-leg and double-leg standing radiographs (rs = 0.518 and 0.471). All measurements had at least good reliability. ConclusionIn long-standing radiographs, measurements of JLOAF, JLOAM, JLOAT, MJLA, JLCA and HKA are all influenced by single-leg/double-leg standing; JLOAF, JLOAM and JLOAT are also affected by bipedal distance in double-leg standing; and JLCA is affected by osteoarthritis grade. Knee joint obliquity as assessed by MPTA measurement is independent of single-leg/double-leg standing, bipedal distance or osteoarthritis grade, and has excellent measurement reliability. We therefore propose MPTA as the preferable KJLO measurement method for clinical practice and future research. Level of evidenceIII, cross-sectional study.

Association of Dipeptidylpeptidase 4 (CD26) With Chondrocyte Senescence and Radiographic Progression in Knee Osteoarthritis.

To evaluate the association of dipeptidylpeptidase 4 (DPP-4; also known as CD26) with cellular senescence of human cartilage and progression of knee osteoarthritis (OA). Articular cartilage sections and chondrocytes were acquired from 35 individuals undergoing total knee replacement for OA to evaluate the following: 1) the association between OA severity and established senescence markers (senescence-associated β-galactosidase activity and p16), which was quantified using immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry (n=19 samples); 2) the coexpression of DPP-4 with established senescence markers, which was assessed using flow cytometry; and 3) expression levels of anabolic and catabolic genes, senescence-related genes, and senescence-associated secretory phenotypes in DPP-4+ and DPP-4- cells, which were isolated using fluorescence-activated cell sorting or magnetic-activated cell sorting (n=16 samples). The concentration of soluble DPP-4 was measured in samples of synovial fluid and samples of plasma from the Prediction of Osteoarthritis Progression cohort and then evaluated for association with the severity of radiographic knee OA at baseline (n=65 samples) and the progression of structural radiographic OA (n=57 samples) over a 3-year period. DPP-4 expression was associated with higher senescence-associated β-galactosidase activity, p16 expression, senescence-related gene and catabolic gene (ADAMTS5, MMP13, IL6, and IL8) expression, higher senescence-associated secretory phenotype secretion, and lower anabolic gene (COL2A1 and ACAN) expression in primary chondrocytes. Synovial fluid DPP-4 concentration was associated with radiographic OA progression (odds ratio 105.32; P=0.015), proteases (synovial fluid matrix metalloproteinase 1 and matrix metalloproteinase 3), aggrecan degradation (synovial fluid sulfated glycosaminoglycan), indicators of activated macrophages (synovial fluid CD14 and CD163), and inflammation (synovial fluid interleukin-6). Our study identifies DPP-4 as a key surface marker in senescent chondrocytes and a predictor of radiographic OA progression.

Investigation of the association of weight loss with radiographic hip osteoarthritis in older community-dwelling female adults.

Most guidelines recommending weight loss for hip osteoarthritis are based on research on knee osteoarthritis. Prior studies found no association between weight loss and hip osteoarthritis, but no previous studies have targeted older adults. Therefore, we aimed to determine whether there is any clear benefit of weight loss for radiographic hip osteoarthritis in older adults because weight loss is associated with health risks in older adults. We used data from white female participants aged ≥65 years from the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures. Our exposure of interest was weight change from baseline to follow-up at 8 years. Our outcomes were the development of radiographic hip osteoarthritis (RHOA) and the progression of RHOA over 8 years. Generalized estimating equations (clustering of 2 hips per participant) were used to investigate the association between exposure and outcomes adjusted for major covariates. There was a total of 11,018 hips from 5509 participants. There was no associated benefit of weight loss for either of our outcomes. The odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) for the development and progression of RHOA were 0.99 (0.92-1.07) and 0.97 (0.86-1.09) for each 5% weight loss, respectively. The results were consistent in sensitivity analyses where participants were limited to those who reported trying to lose weight and who also had a body mass index in the overweight or obese range. Our findings suggest no associated benefit of weight loss in older female adults in the structure of the hip joint as assessed by radiography.

Gait Asymmetry Variation in Kinematics, Kinetics, and Muscle Force along with the Severity Levels of Knee Osteoarthritis.

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients exhibit greater gait asymmetry than healthy controls. However, gait asymmetry in kinematics, kinetics and muscle forces across patients with different severity levels of knee OA is still unknown. The study aimed to investigate the changes of gait asymmetry in lower limb kinematics, kinetics, and muscle force across patients with different severity levels of knee OA. This is a cross-sectional study. From January 2020 to January 2021, 118 patients with symptomatic and radiographic medial knee OA were categorized into three groups using the Kellgren and Lawrence scale (mild: grade 1 and 2, n=37; moderate: grade 3, n=31; severe: grade 4, n=50). During self-paced walking, marker trajectories and ground reaction forces data were recorded. Musculoskeletal simulations were used to determine gait kinematics, kinetics, and muscle force. One-way analysis of variance with Tukey's post-hoc test was used to evaluate group difference. Paired-sample t-test was used to compared the between-limb difference. In the Severe group, significantly greater asymmetry index in knee flexion/extension range of motion (45%) was observed with a greater value on the contralateral side (p < 0.01), compared to the Mild (15%) and Moderate (15%) groups. Significantly higher peak hip contact force (JCF) on the contralateral side was found in the Mild (more affected side: 3.80 ± 0.67 BW, contralateral side: 4.01 ± 0.58 BW), Moderate (more affected side: 3.67 ± 0.56 BW, contralateral side: 4.07 ± 0.81 BW), and Severe groups (more affected side: 3.66 ± 0.79 BW, contralateral side: 3.94 ± 0.64 BW) (p < 0.05). Significantly greater gluteus medius muscle force on the contralateral side was found in Mild (more affected side: 0.48 ± 0.09 BW, contralateral side: 0.52 ± 0.12 BW), Moderate (more affected side: 0.45 ± 0.10 BW, contralateral side: 0.51 ± 0.15 BW), and Severe groups (more affected side: 0.42 ± 0.15 BW, contralateral side: 0.47 ± 0.12 BW) (p < 0.05). The contralateral side showing significantly higher peak knee adduction moment and medial knee JCF was only observed in the Mild group (p < 0.05). Gait asymmetry in kinematics and muscle forces increased from mild to severe knee OA. Asymmetrical gait pattern tends to transfer loads from the more affected side to the contralateral side. Peak hip JCF and gluteus medius muscle force can be used to detect this asymmetrical gait pattern in patients with knee OA, regardless of severity levels.

Patients in high- and low-revision hospitals have similar outcomes after primary knee arthroplasty: 1-year postoperative results from the Danish prospective multicenter cohort study, SPARK

PurposeIt is well-known that revision rates after primary knee arthroplasty vary widely. However, it is uncertain whether hospital revision rates are reliable indicators of general surgical quality as defined by patients. The SPARK study compared primary knee arthroplasty surgery at three high-volume hospitals whose revision rates differed for unknown reasons.MethodsThis prospective observational study included primary knee arthroplasty patients (total, medial/lateral unicompartmental and patellofemoral) in two low-revision hospitals (Aarhus University Hospital and Aalborg University Hospital Farsø) and one high-revision hospital (Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev-Gentofte). Patients were followed from preoperatively (2016–17) to 1-year postoperatively with patient-reported outcome measures including Oxford Knee Score (OKS), EQ-5D-5L and Copenhagen Knee ROM (range of motion) Scale. The surgical outcomes were compared across hospitals for patients with comparable grades of radiographic knee osteoarthritis and preoperative OKS. Statistical comparisons (parametric and non-parametric) included all three hospitals.Results97% of the 1452 patients who provided baseline data (89% of those included and 56% of those operated) responded postoperatively (90% at 1 year). Hospitals’ utilization of unicompartmental knee arthroplasties differed (Aarhus 49%, Aalborg 14%, and Copenhagen 22%, p < 0.001). 28 patients had revision surgery during the first year (hospital independent, p = 0.1) and were subsequently excluded. 1-year OKS (39 ± 7) was independent of hospital (p = 0.1), even when adjusted for age, sex, Body Mass Index, baseline OKS and osteoarthritis grading. 15% of patients improved less than Minimal Important Change (8 OKS) (Aarhus 19%, Aalborg 13% and Copenhagen 14%, p = 0.051 unadjusted). Patients with comparable preoperative OKS or osteoarthritis grading had similar 1-year results across hospitals (OKS and willingness to repeat surgery, p ≥ 0.087) except for the 64 patients with Kellgren–Lawrence grade-4 (Aarhus 4–6 OKS points lower). 86% of patients were satisfied, and 92% were “willing to repeat surgery”, independent of hospital (p ≥ 0.1). Hospital revision rates differences diminished during the study period.ConclusionsPatients in hospitals with a history of differing revision rates had comparable patient-reported outcomes 1 year after primary knee arthroplasty, supporting that surgical quality should not be evaluated by revision rates alone. Future studies should explore if revision rate variations may depend as much on revision thresholds and indications as on outcomes of primary surgery.Level of evidenceLevel II (Prospective cohort study).

A Genome-Wide Association Study Meta-Analysis of Alpha Angle Suggests Cam-Type Morphology May Be a Specific Feature of Hip Osteoarthritis in Older Adults.

To examine the genetic architecture of cam morphology using alpha angle (AA) as a proxy measure and conduct an AA genome-wide association study (GWAS) followed by Mendelian randomization (MR) to evaluate its causal relationship with hip osteoarthritis (OA). Observational analyses examined associations between AA measurements derived from hip dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans from the UK Biobank study and radiographic hip OA outcomes and subsequent total hip replacement. Following these analyses, an AA GWAS meta-analysis was performed (N=44,214) using AA measurements previously derived in the Rotterdam Study. Linkage disequilibrium score regression assessed the genetic correlation between AA and hip OA. Genetic associations considered significant (P < 5 × 10-8 ) were used as AA genetic instrument for 2-sample MR analysis. DXA-derived AA showed expected associations between AA and radiographic hip OA (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.63 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.58, 1.67]) and between AA and total hip replacement (adjusted hazard ratio 1.45 [95% CI 1.33, 1.59]) in the UK Biobank study cohort. The heritability of AA was 10%, and AA had a moderate genetic correlation with hip OA (rg =0.26 [95% CI 0.10, 0.43]). Eight independent genetic signals were associated with AA. Two-sample MR provided weak evidence of causal effects of AA on hip OA risk (inverse variance weighted OR 1.84 [95% CI 1.14, 2.96], P=0.01). In contrast, genetic predisposition for hip OA had stronger evidence of a causal effect on increased AA (inverse variance weighted β=0.09 [95% CI 0.04, 0.13], P=4.58 × 10-5 ). Expected observational associations between AA and related clinical outcomes provided face validity for the DXA-derived AA measurements. Evidence of bidirectional associations between AA and hip OA, particularly for risk of hip OA on AA, suggests that hip shape modeling secondary to a genetic predisposition to hip OA contributes to the well-established relationship between hip OA and cam morphology in older adults.

Association between obesity and osteoarthritis in the South Korean older population: A nationwide population-based study.

There are few studies on the association between obesity and radiologically-confirmed osteoarthritis (OA) in the South Korean older population. We investigated the association between obesity and radiologically-confirmed OA in a nationally-representative sample of the South Korean older population. The study population comprised 5811 participants (2530 men and 3281 women) aged ≥60 years selected from the 2010 to 2012 Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Radiographic OA was defined as Kellgren-Lawrence grade ≥ 2 on either the knee or hip area in radiographic images. The odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for OA were determined using multiple logistic regression analyses after adjusting for confounding factors. Overall, 7.9% and 29.6% of older men and women had OA, respectively. A U-shaped curve with the nadir in the appropriate body weight (body mass index 18.5-23 kg/m2) revealed that 9.0%, 6.8%, 8.1%, and 9.1% of older men and 24.5%, 21.6%, 27.1%, and 38.4% of older women who were underweight, normal weight, overweight, and obese, respectively, had OA. Compared with normal-weight people, the odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) for OA in obese subjects were 1.73 (1.13-2.64) and 2.76 (2.13-3.56) for older men and women, respectively, after adjusting for age, comorbidities, lifestyle behaviors, and socioeconomic status. Obesity was significantly associated with an increased risk of OA in the South Korean older population. This finding suggests that efforts to maintain appropriate body weight and reduce excessive body weight should be considered to reduce the risk of OA in older adults.

Reliability and Validity of Single Axial Slice vs. Multiple Slice Quantitative Measurement of the Volume of Effusion-Synovitis on 3T Knee MRI in Knees with Osteoarthritis.

Effusion-synovitis (ES) is recognized as a component of osteoarthritis, creating a need for rapid methods to assess ES on MRI. We describe the development and reliability of an efficient single-slice semi-automated quantitative approach to measure ES. We used two samples from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI): 50 randomly selected OAI participants with radiographic osteoarthritis (i.e., Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade 2 or 3) and a subset from the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health Osteoarthritis Biomarker study. An experienced musculoskeletal radiologist trained four non-expert readers to use custom semi-automated software to measure ES on a single axial slice and then read scans blinded to prior assessments. The estimated intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for intra-reader reliability of the single-slice ES method in the KL 2-3 sample was 0.96 (95% CI: 0.93, 0.97), and for inter-reader reliability, the ICC was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.87, 0.95). The intra-reader mean absolute difference (MAD) was 35 mm3 (95% CI: 28, 44), and the inter-reader MAD was 61 mm3 (95% CI: 48, 76). Our single-slice quantitative knee ES measurement offers a reliable, valid, and efficient surrogate for multi-slice quantitative and semi-quantitative assessment.

MRI-based T1rho and T2 cartilage compositional imaging in osteoarthritis: what have we learned and what is needed to apply it clinically and in a trial setting?

Cartilage MRI-based T1rho and T2 compositional measurements have been developed to characterize cartilage matrix quality and diagnose cartilage damage before irreversible defects are found, allowing intervention at an early, potentially reversible disease stage. Over the last 2 decades, this technology was investigated in numerous studies and was validated using specimen studies and arthroscopy; and longitudinal studies documented its ability to predict progression of degenerative disease and radiographic osteoarthritis (OA). While T1rho and T2 measurements have shown promise in early disease stages, several hurdles have been encountered to apply this technology clinically. These include (i) challenges with cartilage segmentation, (ii) long image acquisition times, (iii) a lack of standardization of imaging, and (iv) an absence of reference databases and definitions of abnormal cut-off values. Progress has been made by developing deep-learning based automatic cartilage segmentation and faster imaging methods, enabling the feasibility of T1rho and T2 imaging for clinical and scientific trial applications. Also, the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Alliance mechanism was used to establish standardized profiles for compositional T1rho and T2 imaging, and multi-center feasibility testing is work in progress. The last hurdles are the development of reference databases and establishing a definition of normal versus abnormal cartilage T1rho and T2 values. Finally, effective treatments for prevention and slowing progression of OA are required in order to establish T1rho and T2 as imaging biomarkers for initiating and monitoring therapies, analogous to the role of dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) bone mineral density measurements in the management of osteoporosis. KEY POINTS: • T1rho and T2 cartilage measurements have been validated in characterizing cartilage degenerative change using histology and arthroscopy as a reference. • They have also been shown to predict progression of cartilage degeneration and incidence of radiographic OA. • Advances have been made to facilitate clinical and trial application of T1rho and T2 by improved standardization of imaging and by establishing deep learning-based automatic cartilage segmentation. • Effective treatments with disease-modifying OA specific drugs may establish T1rho and T2 cartilage compositional measurements as biomarkers to initiate and monitor treatment.

Acetabular dysplasia and the risk of developing hip osteoarthritis at 2,5,8, and 10 years follow-up in a prospective nationwide cohort study (CHECK).

ObjectiveTo assess the relationship between acetabular dysplasia (AD) and the risk of incident and end-stage radiographic hip osteoarthritis (RHOA) over 2,5,8 and 10 years. DesignIndividuals (n = 1002) aged between 45 and 65 from the prospective Cohort Hip and Cohort Knee (CHECK) were studied. Anteroposterior pelvic radiographs were obtained at baseline and 2,5,8, and 10-years follow-up. False profile radiographs were obtained at baseline. AD was defined as a lateral center edge angle, an anterior center edge angle, or both <25° at baseline. The risk of developing RHOA was determined at each follow-up moment. Incident RHOA was defined by Kellgren & Lawrence (KL) grade ≥2 or total hip replacement (THR), end-stage RHOA by a KL grade ≥3 or THR. Associations were expressed in odds ratios (OR) using logistic regression with generalized estimating equations. ResultsAD was associated with the development of incident RHOA at 2 years follow-up (OR 2.46, 95% CI 1.00–6.04), 5 years follow-up (OR 2.28, 95% CI 1.20–4.31), and 8 years follow-up (OR 1.86, 95%CI 1.22–2.83). AD was only associated with end-stage RHOA at 5 years follow-up (OR 3.75, 95% CI 1.02–13.77). No statistically significant associations were observed between AD and RHOA at 10-years follow-up. ConclusionBaseline AD in individuals between 45 and 65 years is associated with an increased risk of developing RHOA within 2- and 5 years. However, this association seems to weaken after 8 years and disappears after 10 years.

Factors correlated with pain after total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Systematically review and synthesize preoperative and intraoperative factors associated with pain after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in patients with osteoarthritis. Based on a peer-reviewed protocol, we searched Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and PEDro for prospective observational studies (January 2000 to February 2023) investigating factors associated with pain after TKA. The primary outcome was pain twelve months after TKA. Pain at three and six months were secondary outcomes. Multivariate random-effects meta-analyses were used to estimate mean correlation (95% CIs) between factors and pain. Sensitivity analysis was performed for each risk of bias domain and certainty of evidence was assessed. Of 13,640 studies, 29 reports of 10,360 patients and 61 factors were analysed. The mean correlation between preoperative factors and more severe pain at twelve months was estimated to be 0.36 (95% CI, 0.24, 0.47; P < .000; moderate-certainty evidence) for more catastrophizing, 0.15 (95% CI; 0.08, 0.23; P < .001; moderate-certainty evidence) for more symptomatic joints, 0.13 (95% CI, 0.06, 0.19; P < .001; very low-certainty evidence) for more preoperative pain. Mean correlation between more severe radiographic osteoarthritis and less pain was -0.15 (95% CI; -0.23, -0.08; P < .001; low-certainty evidence). In sensitivity analysis, the estimated correlation coefficient for pain catastrophizing factor increased to 0.38 (95% CI 0.04, 0.64). At six and three months, more severe preoperative pain was associated with more pain. Better preoperative mental health was associated with less pain at six months. More pain catastrophizing, more symptomatic joints and more pain preoperatively were correlated with more pain, while more severe osteoarthritis was correlated with less pain one year after TKA. More preoperative pain was correlated with more pain, and better mental health with less pain at six and three months. These findings should be further tested in predictive models to gain knowledge which may improve TKA outcomes.

The role of cam morphology in the progression of radiographic hip osteoarthritis.

To the editor As faithful readers, there is no doubt that we have learned a lot after reading the paper.1 By using the methods mentioned in the article, we can infer that cam morphology was linked with age, higher weight, male gender, and early signs of radiographic damage. These findings are likely to suggest that cam morphology plays a significant role in early osteoarthritis (OA) and may be a precursor or contribute to hip OA in later life. As the author mentions in the article, there were tons of data proving the association between cam morphology and osteoarthritis.1-4 In fact, the results prove that your inference is correct, and we have two points in mind hoping they would be beneficial to your paper. The first point we would like to focus on is the assessment of OA. According to the paper, the assessment of hip OA was used by Prof. Graeme Jones and Dr. Helen Cooley.1 They followed the Osteoarthritis Research Society International grading system and assessed the radiographs. Radiographs were graded on a 4-point scale (range 0 to 3, where 0 represents no disease and 3 represents severe disease). We thought that the judgment on a 4-point scale of OA was vague. The evaluation of a 4-point scale can only be defined by the doctor as artificial. To be argued, the result of the 4-point scale may not be the same due to different patient OA diagnoses. Therefore, we thought that you could try another method that is more automatic and objective in diagnosing patients with OA, such as the Kellgren and Lawrence scale (K-L scale), erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and C-reactive protein.5 These assessments are more objective and are used in many countries. Compared to the 4-point scale in the paper, K-L scale is more specific than the 4-point scale. Therefore, it could be a better choice for you to assess the participants. The second point that we would like to focus on is the method to measure and evaluate participants' hip pain feeling. In the article, the author uses the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) index pain score as the measurement of hip pain.1 To a great degree, the feeling of pain is subjective, which largely depends on the participants themselves. For different participants, the same pain level may cause different pain feelings. Therefore, it is tough and complicated to evaluate participants' pain feelings accurately and rigorously.6 Under this premise, we have learned a lot and consider that the pain evaluating method is great and relatively accurate, compared to many other methods. After all, WOMAC is specific to OA. Data from the participants at 3 and 5 years from baseline is also a great decision. During this period, participants' pain feelings are more obvious. If choosing 0–3 years, that pain feeling and impact may not be obvious enough to evaluate. Meanwhile, if choosing more than 5 years, participants may get used to the painful feelings, which could affect the final evaluation of participants' hip pain feelings, and this is probably because the pain evaluation method is self-reported. However, after reading and searching through lots of information, we have an interesting thought about pain feeling evaluation. WOMAC is good and suitable for OA, without a doubt. But why not try using other pain evaluation systems? If using other pain scales, the result might be different. There are various pain evaluation systems, such as the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability (FLACC) scale, etc.7, 8 Every system uses different degrees of grading, marks, choosing forms, and so on. In a different system, even the same sign could have a different meaning. As stated above, all of these could give rise to different results when participants do pain feeling evaluation self-reportedly in the different evaluation systems. All authors (KSSM, PEK, SBY, and KHC) provided their ideas and critical contribution. KSSM, PEK, SBY, and KHC contributed to the editing of the manuscript. KSSM and PEK contributed equally as first authors. KSSM, PEK, SBY, and KHC contributed equally as corresponding authors. None declared. The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for profit sectors. The authors declare no conflict of interest. Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research. Not required. Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

Dorsal Subluxation of the First Metacarpal During Thumb Flexion is an Indicator of Carpometacarpal Osteoarthritis Progression.

Dorsal Subluxation of the First Metacarpal During Thumb Flexion is an Indicator of Carpometacarpal Osteoarthritis Progression.

Do imaging findings modify the effect of non-surgical treatment in patients with knee and hip osteoarthritis? A systematic literature review

ObjectivesTo review the available evidence on diagnostic imaging findings in knee and hip osteoarthritis (OA) as treatment effect modifiers in non-surgical OA interventions.MethodsMEDLINE, Embase and The Cochrane Central Register of...

Clinically Relevant Subgroups Among Athletes Who Have Ruptured Their Anterior Cruciate Ligaments: A Delaware-Oslo Cohort Study.

To identify subgroups of individuals with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries based on patient characteristics, self-reported outcomes, and functional performance at baseline, and to associate subgroups with long-term outcomes after ACL rupture. A total of 293 participants (45.7% male, mean ± SD age 26.2 ± 9.4 years, days from injury 58 ± 35) were enrolled after effusion, pain, and range of motion impairments were resolved and quadriceps strength was at least 70% of the uninvolved limb. Mixture modeling was used to uncover latent subgroups without a prior group classification using probabilistic assignment. Variables include demographics, functional testing, and self-reported outcome measures. Radiographic evidence of osteoarthritis (OA; i.e., Kellgren/Lawrence grade of ≥1) in the involved knee at 5 years after injury was the primary outcome of interest. Chi-square tests assessed differences in the presence of radiographic OA in the involved knee between subgroups at 5 years after ACL rupture. Secondary outcomes of interest included radiographic OA in the uninvolved knee, return to preinjury sport by 2 years, operative status, and clinical OA (classified using Luyten et al criteria) at 5 years. Four distinct subgroups exist after ACL rupture (younger good self-report, younger poor self-report, older poor self-report, older good self-report) with 30%, 31%, 47%, and 53%, respectively, having involved knee OA. The percentage of radiographic OA was not significantly different between the groups (P=0.059). The prevalence of OA in all subgroups is highly concerning. These results suggest there are unique subgroupings of individuals that may guide treatment after ACL rupture and reconstruction by providing support for developing a patient-centered approach.

Cross-Sectional Associations Of Ultrasound Features At The Knee With Sex, Race, Ethnicity, And Radiographic OA: The Johnston County Health Study

Cross-Sectional Associations Of Ultrasound Features At The Knee With Sex, Race, Ethnicity, And Radiographic OA: The Johnston County Health Study