Radiographic Fusion Research Articles

Comparison of Lumbosacral Fusion Grade in Patients after Transforaminal and Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up.

Generally, anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) was believed superior to transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) in induction of fusion. However, many studies have reported comparable results in lumbosacral fusion rate between the two approaches. This study aimed to evaluate the realistic lumbosacral arthrodesis rates following ALIF and TLIF in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis as measured by CT and radiology. Ninety-six patients who underwent single-level L5-S1 fusion through ALIF (n = 48) or TLIF (n = 48) for degenerative spondylolisthesis at the Spine Center, University of California San Francisco, between October 2014 and December 2017 were retrospectively evaluated. Fusion was independently evaluated and categorized as solid fusion, indeterminate fusion, or pseudarthroses by two radiologists using the modified Brantigan-Steffee-Fraser (mBSF) grade. Clinical data on sex, age, body mass index, Meyerding grade, smoking status, follow-up times, complications, and radiological parameters including disc height, disc angle, segmental lordosis, and overall lumbar lordosis were collected. The fusion results and clinical and radiographic data were statistically compared between the ALIF and TLIF groups by using t-test or chi-square test. The mean follow-up period was 37.5 (ranging from 24 to 51) months. Clear, solid radiographic fusions were higher in the ALIF group compared with the TLIF group at the last follow-up (75% vs 47.9%, p = 0.006). Indeterminate fusion occurred in 20.8% (10/48) of ALIF cases and in 43.8% (21/48) of TLIF cases (p = 0.028). Radiographic pseudarthrosis was not significantly different between the TLIF and ALIF groups (16.7% vs 8.3%; p = 0.677). In subgroup analysis of the patients without bone morphogenetic protein (BMP), the solid radiographic fusion rate was significantly higher in the ALIF group than that in the TLIF group (78.6% vs 45.5%; p = 0.037). There were no differences in sex, age, body mass index, Meyerding grade, smoking status, or follow-up time between the two groups (p > 0.05). The ALIF group had more improvement in disc height (7.8 mm vs 4.7 mm), disc angle (5.2° vs 1.5°), segmental lordosis (7.0° vs 2.5°), and overall lumbar lordosis (4.7° vs 0.7°) compared with the TLIF group (p < 0.05). Overall complication rates were similar between the TLIF and ALIF groups (10.4% vs 8.33%; p > 0.999). With a minimum 2-year radiographic analysis of arthrodesis at lumbosacral level by radiologists, the rate of solid radiographic fusions was higher in the ALIF group compared with the TLIF group, whereas the TLIF group had a higher rate of indeterminate fusion. Radiographic pseudarthrosis did not differ significantly between the TLIF and ALIF groups.

Instrumented Posterior Arthrodesis of the Lumbar Spine: Prospective Study Evaluating Fusion Outcomes in Patients Receiving an Interspinous Fixation Device for the Treatment of Degenerative Spine Diseases.

Prospective evaluation of radiographic fusion outcomes in patients receiving instrumented posterior arthrodesis of the lumbar spine using a minimally invasive interspinous fixation device. All patients (n = 110) from a single US physician's practice who received instrumented posterior arthrodesis of the lumbar spine with a minimally invasive interspinous fixation device in the calendar year 2020 were invited to return for a follow-up CT scan to radiographically assess fusion. Forty-three patients, representing 69 total treated levels, consented to participate and received a lumbar CT scan at a mean of 459 days post-surgery (177 to 652). The interspinous/interlaminar fusion was assessed by 3 independent radiologists using a novel grading scale. Spinous process fractures were also assessed. 92.8% of the assessed levels were considered fused. There were no intraoperative spinous process fractures. There were 4 spinous process fractures (5.8%) identified on CT imaging, all of which were asymptomatic and healed without subsequent intervention. There were no instances of device mechanical failure or device-related reoperation. Instrumented posterior arthrodesis of the lumbar spine using a minimally invasive interspinous fixation device provides clinically meaningful fusion rates with no reoperations and a low risk of spinous process fracture or other device-related complications.

Effect ofFusion andArthroplasty forCervical Degenerative Disc Disease inActive Duty Service Members Performed at an Overseas Military Treatment Facility: A 2-Year Retrospective Analysis.

Among U.S. military active duty service members, cervicalgia, cervical radiculopathy, and myelopathy are common causes of disability, effecting job performance and readiness, often leading to medical separation from the military. Among surgical therapies, anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) are options in select cases; however, elective surgeries performed while serving overseas (OCONUS) have not been studied. A retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected surgical database from an OCONUS military treatment facility over a 2-year period (2019-2021) was queried. Patient and procedural data were collected to include ACDF or CDA surgery, military rank, age, tobacco use, pre- and post-operative visual analogue scales for pain, and presence of radiographic fusion after surgery for ACDF patients or heterotopic ossification for CDA patients. Chi-square and Student t-test analyses were performed to identify variables associated with return to full duty. A total of 47 patients (25 ACDF and 22 CDA) underwent surgery with an average follow-up of 192.1 days (range 7-819 days). Forty-one (87.2%) patients were able to return to duty without restrictions; 10.6% of patients remained on partial or limited duty at latest follow-up and one patient was medically separated from the surgical cohort. There was one complication and one patient required tour curtailment from overseas duty for ongoing symptoms. Both ACDF and CDA are effective and safe surgical procedures for active duty patients with cervicalgia, cervical radiculopathy, and cervical myelopathy. They can be performed OCONUS with minimal interruption to the patient, their family, and the military unit, while helping to maintain surgical readiness for the surgeon and the military treatment facility.

Comparative Evaluation of Mineralized Bone Allografts for Spinal Fusion Surgery.

The primary objective of this review is to evaluate whether the degree of processing and the clinical utility of commercially available mineralized bone allografts for spine surgery meet the 2020 US Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) guideline definitions for minimal manipulation and homologous use, respectively. We also assessed the consistency of performance of these products by examining the comparative postoperative radiographic fusion rates following spine surgery. Based on the FDA's criteria for determining whether a structural allograft averts regulatory oversight and classification as a drug/device/biologic, mineralized bone allografts were judged to meet the Agency's definitional descriptions for minimal manipulation and homologous use when complying with the American Association of Tissue Banks' (AATB) accredited guidelines for bone allograft harvesting, processing, storing and transplanting. Thus, these products do not require FDA medical device clearance. Radiographic fusion rates achieved with mineralized bone allografts were uniformly high (>85%) across three published systematic reviews. Little variation was found in the fusion rates irrespective of anatomical location, allograft geometry, dimensions or indication, and in most cases, the rates were similar to those for autologous bone alone. Continued utilization of mineralized bone allografts should be encouraged across all spine surgery applications where supplemental grafts and/or segmental stability are required to support mechanically solid arthrodeses.

Long-term outcomes of the nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide-66 cage versus the titanium mesh cage for anterior reconstruction of thoracic and lumbar corpectomy: a retrospective study with at least 7 years of follow-up

BackgroundThe nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide-66 (n-HA/PA66) cage is a biomimetic cage with a lower elastic modulus than the titanium mesh cage (TMC). This study aimed to compare the long-term outcomes of the n-HA/PA66 cage and TMC in the anterior reconstruction of thoracic and lumbar fractures.MethodsWe retrospectively studied 113 patients with acute traumatic thoracic or lumbar burst fractures, comprising 60 patients treated with the TMC and 53 treated with the n-HA/PA66 cage for anterior reconstruction following single-level corpectomy. The radiographic data (cage subsidence, fusion status, segmental sagittal alignment) and clinical data (visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) for function) were evaluated preoperatively, postoperatively, and at final follow-up after a minimum 7-year period.ResultsThe n-HA/PA66 and TMC groups had similar final fusion rates (96.2% vs. 95.0%). The cage subsidence at final follow-up was 2.3 ± 1.6 mm with subsidence of more than 3 mm occurring in 24.5% in the n-HA/PA66 group, which was significantly lower than the respective values of 3.9 ± 2.5 mm and 58.3% in the TMC group. The n-HA/PA66 group also had better correction of the bisegmental kyphotic angle than the TMC group (7.1° ± 7.5° vs 1.9° ± 8.6°, p < 0.01), with lower loss of correction (2.9° ± 2.5° vs 5.2° ± 4.1°, p < 0.01). The mean ODI steadily decreased after surgery in both groups. At final follow-up, the ODI and VAS were similar in the TMC and n-HA/PA66 groups.ConclusionsThe n-HA/PA66 cage is associated with excellent radiographic fusion, better maintenance of the height of the fused segment, and better correction of kyphosis than the TMC during 7 years of follow-up after one-level anterior corpectomy. With the added benefit of radiolucency, the n-HA/PA66 cage may be superior to the TMC in anterior reconstruction of thoracic or lumbar fractures.

The Effect of Plate Thickness on Fusion, Complications, and Outcomes in Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery.

Background and objective Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a common surgery involving the cervical spine. The goals of ACDF include obtaining a solid fusion and minimizing complications such as dysphagia. The effect of plate thickness on fusion, dysphagia, and patient outcomes is not well established. In light of this, this study aimed to evaluate the effect of plate thickness on fusion rates, complications, and outcomes in ACDF. Methods A case-control study involving ACDF performed by a single surgeon was conducted with the aimof comparing two commercially available plating systems: the Medtronic plate (Atlantis Vision Elite, Medtronic, Memphis, TN) and Aegis plate (CastleLoc-P, Aegis, Englewood, CO).The patients treated with the Medtronic plate served as the control group (Std) as the plate is widely utilized, while those treated with the Aegis plate, which is touted as one of the thinnest plates on the market, constituted the case low-profile group (LP). Demographic variables, fusion status, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) were compared between the two systems. Results Baseline demographic data were not significantly different between groups. The LP plate group had a significantly lower rate of fusion per patient as well as per level at 12 months. PROM did not significantly differ at any time point between the groups. Dysphagia scores could be correlated with radiographic measures reported in the Prevertebral Soft Tissue Swelling - Index (PVSTS-I). Conclusion Based on our findings, the plate thickness was not associated withdysphagia rates; however, the use of a thinner platecorrelated with a lower rate of radiographic fusion at 12 months. The PVSTS-I may be useful for identifying patients with abnormal and severely abnormal dysphagia scores.

Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusions Supplemented With Cellular or Noncellular Allografts Have Similar Radiographic Fusion and Clinical Outcomes.

A retrospective, single-center study. The aim of this study was to assess radiographic fusion after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) supplemented with either demineralized bone matrix or ViviGen in a polyetheretherketone biomechanical interbody cage. Cellular and noncellular allografts are utilized as adjuncts in attempts to improve fusion after ACDF. The purpose of this study was to assess radiographic fusion and clinical outcomes after ACDF supplemented with cellular or noncellular allografts. A single surgeon's clinical practice database was interrogated for consecutive patients who underwent a primary ACDF using cellular or noncellular allograft from 2017 to 2019. These subjects were matched by age, sex, body mass index, smoking status, and levels operated. Patient demographic and preoperative and postoperative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) including Visual Analog Scale Pain, Neck Disability Index, EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS), and Eating Assessment Tool 10 were collected preoperatively and at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Radiographic evidence of fusion was determined by <2mm motion between spinous processes on flexion and extension radiographs and assessing bony bridging at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. There were 68 total patients, with 34 patients in each group, and 69 and 67 operative levels in the cellular and noncellular allograft groups, respectively. There was no difference in age, sex, body mass index, or smoking status between groups ( P >0.05). There was no difference in number of 1-level, 2-level, 3-level, or 4-level ACDFs between cellular and noncellular groups ( P >0.05). At 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively, there was no difference in the percent of operated levels with <2mm motion between spinous processes, complete bony bridging, or both <2mm motion and complete bony bridging in the cellular and noncellular groups ( P >0.05). There was no difference in the number of patients fused at all operated levels at 3, 6, or 12 months postoperatively ( P >0.05). No patient required revision ACDF for symptomatic pseudarthrosis. There was no significant difference in PROMs between the cellular and noncellular groups at 12 months postoperatively except for improved EQ-5D and PROMIS-physical in the cellular compared with noncellular group ( P =0.03). Similar radiographic fusion rates were achieved with cellular and noncellular allografts at all operated levels with similar PROMs in the cellular and noncellular groups at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Thus, ACDFs supplemented with cellular allograft demonstrate adequate radiographic fusion rates when compared with noncellular allografts with similar patient outcomes. Level III.

A Comparison of Radiographic Alignment between Bilateral and Unilateral Interbody Cages in Patients Undergoing Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Retrospective cohort study. To compare radiographic outcomes between unilateral and bilateral cage placement in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions (TLIF) and to determine if the rate of fusion at the 1-year postoperative point was different in patients who received bilateral versus unilateral cages. There is no clear evidence to dictate whether bilateral or unilateral cages promote superior radiographic or surgical outcomes in TLIF. Patients >18 years old who underwent primary one- or two-level TLIFs at our institution were identified and propensitymatched in a 3:1 fashion (unilateral:bilateral). Patient demographics, surgical characteristics, and radiographic outcomes, including vertebral endplate obliquity, segmental lordosis, subsidence, and fusion status, were compared between groups. Of the 184 patients included, 46 received bilateral cages. Bilateral cage placement was associated with greater subsidence (1.06±1.25 mm vs. 0.59±1.16 mm, p=0.028) and enhanced restoration of segmental lordosis (5.74°±14.1° vs. -1.57°±10.9°, p=0.002) at the 1-year postoperative point, while unilateral cage placement was associated with an increased correction of endplate obliquity (-2.02°±4.42° vs. 0.24°±2.81°, p<0.001). Bilateral cage placement was significantly associated with radiographic fusion on bivariate analysis (89.1% vs. 70.3%, p=0.018) and significantly predicted radiographic fusion on multivariable regression analysis (estimate, 1.35; odds ratio, 3.87; 95% confidence interval, 1.51-12.05; p=0.010). Bilateral interbody cage placement in TLIF procedures was associated with restoration of lumbar lordosis and increased fusion rates. However, endplate obliquity correction was significantly greater for patients who received a unilateral cage.

122 Prospective, Randomized, Blinded Clinical Trial Comparing PEEK and Allograft Spacers in Patients Undergoing ACDF Surgeries

INTRODUCTION: The biomechanical qualities as well as osteoconductive, osteogenic, and osteoinductive properties of various graft materials have been previously evaluated. There remain questions, however as to whether there are any clinical and/or radiographic outcome differences in the selection of interbody graft types for ACDF. METHODS: Patients undergoing one- to three-level ACDF with single anterior plate fixation were randomized (1:1 ratio) to receive either cortical allograft or PEEK interbody spacers. Radiographic and clinical outcomes were assessed at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months with an additional postoperative radiographic assessment. RESULTS: A total of 120 patients were enrolled and randomized. Comparing clinical outcomes, no differences in arm or neck pain scores were noted, however, there was a statistically significant (&lt;0.041) improvement in SF-36 PCS scores for the allograft group at all follow-up time points and a tendency towards lower disability scores. Overall, evidence of radiographic fusion was achieved in 87 (91.6%) patients: five (10.2%) and three (6.5%) patients had pseudoarthrosis (p=0.72) in the PEEK and allograft groups, respectively. At the 24-month follow-up, any cervical or segmental alignment restoration achieved with surgery was lost and no statistically significant changes were detected when all levels of surgery were included. Likewise, there were no statistically significant differences between the groups for anterior or posterior body height measurements at the 24-month follow-up. Approximately 20% of patients had anterior and posterior subsidence, all grade 0 regardless of the group assignment. CONCLUSIONS: Comparable radiographic outcomes were observed for patients undergoing one- to three-level PEEK vs. allograft-assisted ACDF surgeries.

12-Month clinical and radiographic outcomes of ViBone viable bone matrix in patients undergoing cervical and lumbar spinal fusion surgery

BackgroundTo investigate the clinical safety and efficacy of ViBone® Viable Bone Matrix (VBM), a next generation cellular bone matrix allograft that comprises all three essential bone-forming components: osteogenic, osteoinductive, and osteoconductive factors, and is optimized to enhance cell viability and bone formation.MethodsThis was a multi-center, prospective, post-market study evaluating the safety and efficacy of ViBone VBM in patients undergoing 1–3 level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion or lumbar interbody fusion surgery. Patients were evaluated at baseline, 6-month, and 12-month follow-up clinically and radiographically. Clinical assessment included Visual Analog Scale for pain (VAS-pain), the Neck Disability Index (NDI) for patients with cervical pathologies, and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) for patients with lumbar pathologies. Fusion success defined by an independent radiologist was determined radiographically by plain films.ResultsClinical outcomes evaluated with VAS-pain, NDI, and ODI scales were improved significantly at 6 and 12 months compared to baseline. All patients reached clinically significant improvements at 12 months. There were no adverse events or infections attributed to ViBone VBM. At 12 months, the fusion rate per patient was 88.1% in cervical and 97.6% in lumbar patients, while per-level fusion was 98.5% for cervical and 100% for lumbar segments.ConclusionsPatients undergoing cervical and lumbar spinal fusion implanted with ViBone VBM demonstrated favorable outcomes at 6 months and 12 months as measured by subjective clinical measures and radiographic fusion rates.Trial registration This study was registered as NCT03425682 on 1/29/2018.

Arthrodesis of the First to Second Metacarpal for Definitive Management of Failed Thumb Carpometacarpal Arthroplasty: A Case Series.

Thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) arthroplasty with resection of the trapezium and soft tissue interposition, with or without ligament reconstruction, has historically proven to be an efficacious treatment for thumb CMC arthritis. The incidence of failure following primary thumb CMC arthroplasty is low; however, the evaluation and management of a patient experiencing an unsatisfactory outcome following CMC arthroplasty is challenging. If symptoms are refractory to conservative measures, then revision surgical treatment may be indicated. Clinical decision making becomes even more complicated in cases of failure after an initial revision surgery has already been performed. In patients with a failed CMC arthroplasty revision in whom all soft tissue options have been exhausted, the senior author considers arthrodesis of the first metacarpal base to the second metacarpal base as a salvage procedure. The authors describe this surgical technique and present our experience with 4 cases in 3 patients who underwent this surgical intervention. Successful radiographic fusion was achieved in all 4 cases, with satisfactory clinical outcome in 3 out of 4 cases, supporting this surgical technique as a definitive option for patients who have failed multiple CMC arthroplasty revision surgeries.

Tibiotalar and Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis with Paragon28 SilverbackTM Plating System in Patients with Severe Ankle and Hindfoot Deformity

The treatment of end-stage ankle osteoarthritis (OA) and associated hindfoot deformities remains a major challenge for orthopedic surgeons. Numerous techniques and surgical approaches have been proposed for tibiotalar (TT) and tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) arthrodesis, from arthroscopic to open, as well as numerous devices proposed for internal fixation (retrograde intramedullary nails, cannulated screws, and plating systems). The aim of this study was to retrospectively analyze the results, with at least 18 months of follow-up, with SilverbackTM TT/TTC Plating System Paragon28 in a group of 20 patients with severe OA and hindfoot deformities (mainly secondary post-traumatic OA). The demographic characteristics and past medical history of the patients were collected and analyzed to identify the cause of the pathology. The degree of OA and deformity were quantified based on foot and ankle weight-bearing radiography and CT examination. Pre- and post-operative clinical and functional scores (ROM, VAS, AOFAS, FFI, and SF-36) and radiographic parameters (anterior distal tibial angle, tibiotalar angle, coronal tibiotalar angle, and hindfoot alignment angle) were evaluated. All of the patients showed clinical and radiographic fusion at an average of 14 weeks (range 12-48), with improvement in pain and functional scores, without major surgical complications and/or infections. Despite the limitations of our study, the results with this new plating system showed good results in terms of bone consolidation, post-operative complications, and improvement of pain and quality of life in patients with severe OA and deformities of the ankle and hindfoot.

Posterior Oblique Approach for Sacroiliac Joint Fusion.

Introduction Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pain is a common source of low back pain. Though this condition can be treated with conservative measures, there is a subset of patients who fail to respond to conservative treatment. For them, surgical treatment using minimally invasive techniques could be considered. There are currently a number of SIJ fixation methods described. However, there is no case series reported on posterior oblique approach. Therefore, in this paper, the authors report their experience with the Sacrix system via the posterior oblique approach. Method In this series, 19 patients aged 44-84 years, with a median of 58 years, underwent SIJ fusion using this technique. This is a posterior oblique approach in which two screws are inserted into the ilium through the posterior part of the iliac crest and then advanced into the sacrum through the SIJ. Results The follow-up is between 7 and 30 months, with a median of 12 months. Eighteen patients had excellent pain relief. There was no complication from the procedure, and the blood loss was minimal. All eight patients who had follow-up radiographs showed solid fusion. Conclusion Posterior oblique approach for SIJ fusion is a minimally invasive procedure that proved to be effective and safe in this series. It also resulted in solid radiographic fusion, decreased pain, and improved function.

Efficacy of an allograft cellular bone matrix as an alternative to autograft in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: radiological results & safety.

The predominant surgical procedure employed for patients with symptomatic cervical radiculopathy is anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). ACDF typically involves the use of an interbody cage augmented with iliac crest bone graft (ICBG) or local autograft to enhance fusion rate. Substantial complications can arise from autograft use, including donor site morbidity, difficulties with ambulation, and diminished quality of life. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of an allograft cellular bone matrix (ACBM) as an osteopromotive bone, in ACDF procedures. This retrospective, single-center, consecutive case series included 73 patients who underwent an ACDF procedure. The surgical procedure involved the placement of an interbody cage supplemented with anterior plate fixation and an ACBM within the interbody spacer. Patient charts were reviewed to gather demographic information, radiographic findings, as well as perioperative and post-operative complications. Radiographic fusion was assessed at 6 and 12 months by a blinded, musculoskeletal-trained radiologist and a board-certified spinal surgeon reviewer. Any discrepancies were settled by a third, senior reviewer. Complete fusion was defined as: evidence of bridging bone across the disc space on CT, angular motion <3 degrees, and translational motion <2 mm on lateral radiographs. Complications were analyzed at 6, 12, and 15+ months post-operatively to assess clinical outcomes and device performance. A total of 73 patients (50 males, 23 females) with an average age of 54.6 (range, 31-77) years underwent an ACDF procedure between C3-T1 with an ACBM. The breakdown of levels operated on was 26%, 32%, 34%, and 8% for one, two, three, and four level procedures, respectively. There were three patients who received spinal injections for pain within the first year post-operatively. There were two patients who required secondary surgery within the first 12 months where supplemental posterior hardware was needed. Notably, there were no instances of cage subsidence, cage migration, cage/graft removal, or reoperation. There were no cases of chronic dysphasia. At 6 months, 45% of patients with available imaging demonstrated complete fusion, while 97.4% of patients with available imaging demonstrated complete fusion at 12 months. At the 12-month follow-up, our study demonstrates a high fusion rate in a real-world population of up to 4 operative levels. There were no bone graft related complications or incidences of cage migration/subsidence. It is noteworthy that the study involved a significant number of multilevel cases (74% of cases). Despite this, our results align with historical fusion rates and provide support for the utilization of ACBMs as a fusion adjunct in ACDF procedures up to 4 levels.

Functional and Radiological Outcome of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Titanium Cage Fusion in the Management of Patients with Degenerative Cervical Spine Disease

Background: The causes of cervical radiculopathy include trauma, disc herniation, instability, spondylosis and, in rare cases, malignancies. Degenerative spinal disorders are often treated by anterior cervical discectomy. Objective: To assess the functional and radiological outcome of anterior cervical discectomy and titanium cage fusion in the management of patients with degenerative cervical spine disease Methodology: The current study was descriptive study carried out at the orthopedic department, Qazi Hussain Ahmad Medical College, Nowshera from August 2021 to August 2022. All the relevant laboratory and radiological investigations were carried out for the enrolled patients. Cervical radiographs were examined for fusion, cage subsidence, and kyphosis at each visit. The functional outcomes, quality of life and pain level was determined for all the patients. IBM SPSS version 23 was employed for analysis of data. Results: In the current study, totally 50 patients were enrolled. The male participants in this study were 30 (60%) while female patients were 20 (40%). The mean age of the patients was 53 (±5.32). The pre-operative mean NDI, VAS and EQ-5D-5L index was 42 (5.90), 8.11 (2.11) and 0.54 (0.01) respectively while the post-operative mean NDI, VAS and EQ-5D-5L index was 19 (2.81), 2 (1.88) and 0.75(0.01) respectively (p=˂0.05). In all the enrolled patients radiographical fusion was achieve successfully. Segmental subsidence was reported in 2 (4%) patients while kyphosis was not observed in any of our patients. Conclusion: Our study concludes that in patients with symptomatic degenerative cervical spine disease, the anterior cervical discectomy and titanium cage fusion is an effective and safe surgical procedure with excellent functional and radiological outcome. Our study observed minimal complication rate by using this procedure. Keywords: Radiological outcome; Anterior cervical discectomy; titanium cage fusion; degenerative cervical spine disease

A Comparison Between Cortical Bone Trajectory Screws And Traditional Pedicle Screws in Patients With Single-Level Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: Five-Year Results.

A retrospective observational study. This study investigated the clinical and radiological results of using cortical bone trajectory (CBT) screws versus traditional pedicle (TP) screws in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) during a five-year follow-up of patients with single-level lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. Few studies have compared five-year follow-up outcomes between CBT screws and TP screws in TLIF. We reviewed outcome data of patients with single-level lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis who underwent TLIF procedures with CBT screws (131 patients) or TP screws (80 patients) between 2011 and 2015. Patient-reported clinical outcome data included Oswestry disability index scores and visual analog scale (VAS) scores for back and leg pain at baseline, six months, and one year, two years, and five years postoperatively. The radiographic fusion rate and prevalence of secondary surgery for adjacent segment disease were also measured. During the follow-up over five years, the CBT group had significantly lower VAS scores for back pain ( P <0.0001, respectively). At two years after surgery, the CBT group had significantly higher VAS scores for leg pain ( P =0.007). At five years postoperatively, no significant differences existed in the VAS score for leg pain or in the Oswestry disability index score between the two groups. Radiographic fusion rates (CBT vs. TP: 95.5% vs. 95.9%; P =0.881) and adverse events during the five years after surgery were not significantly different. At two years postoperatively, the prevalence of secondary surgery to treat adjacent segment disease was significantly different between the two groups (CBT vs . TP: 13.7% vs. 5.0%; P =0.044). Our results suggest that, during a five-year followup, CBT screws for TLIF were an effective treatment compared to TP screws in the setting of single-level lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. However, when using CBT screws for TLIF, surgeons should consider the higher rate of secondary procedures to treat symptomatic adjacent segment disease.

Awake spinal fusion: a retrospective analysis of minimal invasive single level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion done under spinal anaesthesia in 150 cases

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background&lt;/strong&gt;: Spinal anaesthesia carries the advantage of having rapid onset, lesser blood loss, early recovery and hospital stay as compared to general anaesthesia. The present study evaluated outcomes of awake spinal fusion i.e., minimal invasive single level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) under spinal anaesthesia. Current study is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data carried to assess patient related outcome benefits for a single level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion done under spinal anaesthesia.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods&lt;/strong&gt;: Patients who fit deemed criteria not responding to 6 weeks of conservative treatment to lumbar degenerative pathologies underwent MIS-TLIF. The demographic data, visual analogue pain scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), blood loss, time from entering operation theatre to time of incision, time of bandaging to exit from operation theatre, time of stay in post anaesthesia care unit (PACU), duration of surgery, nausea/vomiting, urinary retention, requirement of analgesics, duration of stay in hospital, peri-operative complications, fusion rate and satisfaction score were compiled and assessed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results:&lt;/strong&gt; 150 patients were operated with MISTLIF under spinal anaesthesia. VAS and ODI score improved significantly at final follow up (p&amp;lt;0.05). The mean duration of surgery was 148±18.24 minutes and blood loss were 109.64±110.45 ml. The average time from entering OT to incision and bandaging to exit was respectively 27.32±8.44 and 6.43±3.28 minutes. Mean PACU time was 36.74±6.32 minutes while duration of stay averaged 1.58±0.67 days. Post operative analgesia requirement was in 10.6% patients and radiographic fusion was observed in 96.6% patients. 90.6% patients were fully satisfied with spinal anaesthesia.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions: &lt;/strong&gt;Awake spinal fusion should be considered as a novel surgical approach with newer minimal invasive surgical techniques and regional anaesthesia to improve patient satisfaction and overall surgical outcome.&lt;/p&gt;

Clinical Effect of Minimally Invasive Microendoscopic-Assisted Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Single-Level Lumbar Disc Herniation.

This retrospective study aimed to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) through the Wiltse approach (W-TLIF) vs minimally invasive microendoscopy-assisted transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (ME-TLIF) in single-segment lumbar disc herniation (LDH). A retrospective study was conducted to study the differences in specific clinical outcomes between single-segment LDH patients receiving W-TLIF and ME-TLIF. Single-segment LDH patients admitted to the Fujian Medical University Union Hospital from March 2015 to June 2018 were included. All the participants were divided into the ME-TLIF group or the W-TLIF group according to their TLIF surgery types. Demographic characteristics, the visual analog score (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scale, blood loss volume, postoperative drainage, ambulated time, initial postoperative back pain, hospitalization duration, expenses, and improvement rates of patients in the two groups were collected for analysis. Radiographic fusion was ultimately assessed via the Bridwell interbody fusion grading system. All selected patients with TLIF were followed up for 1 year. Fifty-seven patients were selected, with 26 in the ME-TLIF group and 31 in the W-TLIF group, both of whom were followed up for 1 year. The mean age of the included patients was 53.75 ± 9.313 years, and the sex ratio was indiscrimination. There was no significant difference in demographic data or operating time between the two groups prior to surgery. The blood loss volume (ME-TLIF: 228.5 vs W-TLIF: 681.3), postoperative drainage (ME-TLIF:82.1 ± 23.5 vs W-TLIF: 345.8 ± 65.2), initial postoperative back pain (ME-TLIF: VAS_3 days: 1.96 ± 0.60 VAS_7 days: 1.73 ± 0.53, W-TLIF: VAS_3 days: 2.48 ± 0.51 VAS_7 days: 1.87 ± 0.43), and hospitalization duration (ME-TLIF: 9.04 vs. W-TLIF: 11.29) were all significantly lower in the ME-TILF group (p < 0.05). However, there were no statistical differences between the two groups in VAS, ODI, and JOA at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively (p > 0.05). The fusion rates of the two groups showed no notable difference (p > 0.05), while the X-ray exposure time in the ME-TLIF group was significantly longer than in the W-TLIF group (p < 0.05). ME-TLIF surgery was an effective and satisfactory surgical technique to manage LDH. Although ME-TLIF increased the operation time and intraoperative fluoroscopic irradiation volume, it could effectively relieve low back pain from early postoperative onset and promote early postoperative recovery compared with W-TLIF.

Twelve-Month Results from a Prospective Clinical Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Cellular Bone Allograft in Subjects Undergoing Lumbar Spinal Fusion.

While autologous bone grafts remain the gold standard for spinal fusion procedures, harvesting autologous bone is associated with significant complications, including donor site infection, hematomas, increased operative time, and prolonged pain. Cellular bone allograft (CBA) presents an alternative to autologous bone harvesting, with a favorable efficacy and safety profile. The current study further investigates CBA as an adjunct to lumbar spinal fusion procedures. A prospective, multicenter, open-label clinical study was conducted in subjects undergoing lumbar spinal fusion with CBA (NCT02969616). Radiographic fusion status was assessed by an independent review of dynamic radiographs and CT scans. Clinical outcome measures included the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and visual analogue scale (VAS) for back and leg pain. Adverse-event reporting was conducted throughout 12 months of follow-up. Available subject data at 12 months were analyzed. A total of 274 subjects were enrolled into the study, with available data from 201 subjects (73.3%) who completed 12 months of postoperative radiographic and clinical evaluation at the time of analysis. Subjects had a mean age of 60.2 ± 11.5 years. A higher number of women (n = 124, 61.7%) than men (n = 77, 38.3%) were enrolled, with a collective mean BMI of 30.6 + 6.5 kg/m² (range 18.0-51.4). At month 12, successful fusion was achieved in 90.5% of subjects. A significant (<i>p</i> &amp;lt; 0.001) improvement in ODI, VAS-back, and VAS-leg clinical outcomes was also observed compared to baseline scores. One adverse event related to CBA (postoperative radiculopathy) was reported, with surgical exploration demonstrating interbody extrusion of graft material. This subject reported successful fusion at month 12. CBA represents a viable substitute for harvesting of autograft alone with a high rate of successful fusion and significant improvements in subject-reported outcomes, such as pain and disability. Positive benefit was observed in subjects reporting single and multiple risk factors for pseudoarthrosis.

Instrumentation choice and early radiographic outcome following lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF): Lateral instrumentation versus posterior pedicle screw fixation

BackgroundLateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) is a minimally invasive fusion procedure that may be performed with or without supplemental instrumentation. However, there is a paucity of evidence on the effect of supplemental instrumentation technique on perioperative morbidity and fusion rate in LLIF. MethodsA single-institutional retrospective review of patients who underwent LLIF for lumbar spondylosis was conducted. Patients were grouped according to supplemental instrumentation technique: stand-alone LLIF, LLIF with laterally placed instrumentation, or LLIF with posterior percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSF). Outcomes included fusion rates, peri-operative complication, and reoperation; estimated blood loss (EBL); surgery duration; length of stay; and length of follow-up. Results82 patients underwent LLIF at 114 levels. 35 patients (42.7%) received supplemental lateral instrumentation, 30 (36.6%) received supplemental PPSF, and 17 (20.7%) underwent stand-alone LLIF. More patients in the lateral instrumentation group had prior lumbar fusion at adjacent levels (23/35, 65.71%) versus stand-alone (3/17, 17.6%) or PPSF (2/30, 6.67%) groups (p = 0.003). 4/17 patients (23.5%) with stand-alone LLIF and 4/35 patients (11.42%) with lateral instrumentation underwent reoperation, versus 0/30 with PPSF (p = 0.030). There was no difference in fusion rates between groups (p = 0.717). Operation duration was longer in patients with PPSF (p < 0.005) and length of follow-up was longer for PPSF than lateral instrumentation (p = 0.001). Choice of instrumentation group was a statistically significant predictor of reoperation. ConclusionsWhile rates of complete radiographic fusion on imaging follow-up didn't differ, patients receiving PPSF were less likely than stand-alone or lateral instrumentation groups to require reoperation, though operative time was significantly longer. Further study of choice of supplemental instrumentation with LLIF is indicated.