You have accessJournal of UrologyKidney Cancer: Localized I1 Apr 2010821 SMALL RENAL MASS NEEDLE CORE BIOPSY: OUTCOMES OF NON-DIAGNOSTIC PERCUTANEOUS BIOPSY AND ROLE OF REPEAT BIOPSY Michael Leveridge, Daniel Shiff, Hannah Chung, Laura Legere, Kimberly Fernandes, Andrew Evans, John Kachura, Antonio Finelli, and Michael Jewett Michael LeveridgeMichael Leveridge More articles by this author , Daniel ShiffDaniel Shiff More articles by this author , Hannah ChungHannah Chung More articles by this author , Laura LegereLaura Legere More articles by this author , Kimberly FernandesKimberly Fernandes More articles by this author , Andrew EvansAndrew Evans More articles by this author , John KachuraJohn Kachura More articles by this author , Antonio FinelliAntonio Finelli More articles by this author , and Michael JewettMichael Jewett More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2010.02.1522AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Percutaneous needle core biopsy is becoming established in the management of small renal masses ≤4 cm (SRMs). Numerous recent series have reported success rates of ≥80% with excellent predictive accuracy. Indeterminate or non-diagnostic results continue to be a problem. We present the results of a large biopsy series with outcomes of the non-diagnostic biopsies. METHODS A prospectively maintained database of patients undergoing renal mass biopsy was analyzed to determine the pathology and outcomes of SRM biopsies. Reports of “indeterminate” results included insufficient material, normal kidney or non-renal tissue. Repeat biopsy has recently been recommended and the correlation with the first biopsy as well as outcome were analyzed. RESULTS Three hundred sixteen (316) biopsies were performed (SRM mean diameter 2.5 cm) between January 2000 and October 2009. Biopsy was diagnostic in 266 cases (84.2%) and non-diagnostic in 50 cases (15.8%). Among diagnostic biopsies, 203 (76.3%) were malignant, 95.1% of which were renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Histologic subtyping and grading of RCC was possible in 87.6% and 62.7% of cases, respectively. Seven (7/50 or 14%) of the non-diagnostic biopsies were taken at the time of radiofrequency ablation. Four patients underwent surgical resection of the mass, and 23 were managed by active surveillance. Repeat biopsy was performed in 11 of the 50 non-diagnostic cases, and a diagnosis was possible in 10 (91%). Eight lesions were malignant, and 2 were oncocytic neoplasms. Larger tumor size and a solid nature were found to predict a successful biopsy. Minor complications were experienced in 10.3% of cases, with no major bleeding noted, and no seeding of the biopsy tract. CONCLUSIONS Percutaneous biopsy can be performed safely and accurately in the investigation of renal masses 4cm or less in size. In those cases in which the biopsy is indeterminate, repeat biopsy can be performed with similar accuracy, thus providing a diagnosis in the majority of patients. Toronto, Canada© 2010 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 183Issue 4SApril 2010Page: e321 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2010 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Michael Leveridge More articles by this author Daniel Shiff More articles by this author Hannah Chung More articles by this author Laura Legere More articles by this author Kimberly Fernandes More articles by this author Andrew Evans More articles by this author John Kachura More articles by this author Antonio Finelli More articles by this author Michael Jewett More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Read full abstract