Radiofrequency Ablation Of Colorectal Liver Metastases Research Articles

Combining Radiofrequency Ablation with Hepatic Resection for Liver-Only Colorectal Metastases: A Propensity-Score Based Analysis of Long-Term Outcomes.

Combining liver resection (LR) with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is nowadays an accepted option for treating colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs), but the number of lesions ablated is regularly described as a recurrence risk factor. In this study, we report our experience and determine the impact of RFA on long-term outcomes. This is a retrospective study including patients undergoing LR with or without RFA for CRLM. All variables influencing disease-free survival (DFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were examined through a Cox regression analysis before and after propensity-score matching (PSM). Among the 128 patients included, 71 (55.5%) underwent LR alone and 57 (44.5%) underwent LR+RFA. With univariate analysis, LR+RFA showed a significantly worse DFS than LR alone (p = 0.028), which was not confirmed after PSM (p = 0.064). Thermal ablation did not influence DSS before or after matching (p = 0.282 and p = 0.189). When analyzing the subgroups of patients according to number of RFAs performed, no difference in long-term outcomes was observed (after PSM: p = 0.192 for DFS and p = 0.624 for DSS). Analysis of site of recurrence revealed that neither performing an RFA (p = 0.893) nor the number of lesions ablated (p = 0.093, p = 0.550, and p = 0.087 for 1, 2, and ≥ 2 RFAs) were associated with an increased risk of liver-only relapse. In the setting of a parenchymal sparing strategy, combining RFA with LR is safe in terms of oncological outcomes. Tumor burden, rather than RFA performed, independently influences risk of recurrence and patient survival.

A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis of Periprocedural Variables Affecting Local Tumor Progression after Radiofrequency Ablation of Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases.

Background Local tumor progression (LTP) is associated with poorer survival in patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for colorectal liver metastasis (CLM). An algorithmic strategy to predict LTP may help in selection of patients who would benefit most from RFA for CLM. Purpose To estimate local tumor progression-free survival (LTPFS) following RFA of CLM and develop an algorithmic strategy based on clinical variables. Materials and Methods In this retrospective study, between March 2000 and December 2014, patients who underwent percutaneous RFA for CLM were randomly split into development (60%) and internal validation (40%) data sets. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate LTPFS and overall survival (OS) rates. Independent factors affecting LTPFS in the development data set were investigated by using multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analysis. Risk scores were assigned to the risk factors and applied to the validation data set. Results A total of 365 patients (mean age, 60 years ± 11 [standard deviation]; 259 men) with 512 CLMs were evaluated. LTPFS and OS rates were 85% and 92% at 1 year, 73% and 41% at 5 years, 72% and 30% at 10 years, and 72% and 28% at 15 years, respectively. Independent risk factors for LTP included tumor size of 2 cm or greater (hazard ratio [HR], 3.8; 95% CI: 2.3, 6.2; P < .001), subcapsular tumor location (HR, 1.9; 95% CI: 1.1, 3.1; P = .02), and minimal ablative margin of 5 mm or less (HR, 11.7; 95% CI: 4.7, 29.2; P < .001). A prediction model that used the risk factors had areas under the curve of 0.89, 0.92, and 0.90 at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively, and it showed significantly better areas under the curve when compared with the model using the minimal ablative margin of 5 mm or less alone. Conclusion Radiofrequency ablation provided long-term control of colorectal liver metastases. Although minimal ablative margin of 5 mm or less was the most dominant factor, the multifactorial approach including tumor size and subcapsular location better predicted local tumor progression-free survival. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Soulen and Sofocleous in this issue.

Prognostic factors of radiofrequency ablation therapy for liver metastases from colorectal cancer

AbstractWe evaluated the prognostic factors in patients with colorectal liver metastases undergoing radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Between 2008 and 2013, 52 patients (males 34, mean age: 63 years) with colorectal liver metastases treated with either percutaneous RFA (n = 33) or intraoperative RFA plus resection (n = 19) were enrolled. Cumulative incidence of new recurrence was estimated using the Kaplan‐Meier method. The prognostic relevance of clinical variables and recurrence or survival were evaluated using the log‐rank test and multivariate Cox's regression analysis, respectively. Primary technical success was achieved in 45 (87%) of the cases. There were no procedure‐related deaths. Multinodularity (&gt;3) (P = 0.001) predicted higher incidence of developing new recurrence after RFA. Overall 1‐, 2‐, and 3‐year survival from RFA was 87%, 61%, and 46%, respectively. Factors associated with overall mortality were age younger than 60 years (P = 0.036), extrahepatic metastasis (P = 0.003), and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level ≥10 ng/mL before RFA (P = 0.011). Multivariate Cox's regression analysis showed that young age (&lt;60 years) and high CEA level (≥10 ng/mL) were independent factors associated with overall survival. RFA for colorectal liver metastases is an effective treatment option. Young age and high CEA level predicted poorer outcomes after RFA.

The value of KRAS gene status in predicting local tumor progression of colorectal liver metastases following radiofrequency ablation

Purpose: We investigated the relationships between KRAS gene status and local tumor progression (LTP) of colorectal liver metastases (CLMs) after treatment with percutaneous ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA).Materials and methods: Clinical and imaging data from 76 patients (154 lesions) with CLM who underwent percutaneous ultrasound-guided RFA and had KRAS gene test results between January 2012 and June 2016 were analyzed. The average lesion size was 2.3 ± 1.0 cm (range 0.9–5.7 cm); 38 cases (82 lesions) had wild-type KRAS, and 38 cases (72 lesions) had KRAS mutations.Results: The technique effectiveness was 98.1% (151/154), and the LTP rate was 18.2% (28/154) after RFA, which was performed between January 2012 and November 2017. The mean and median follow-up were 32.7 ± 2.5 and 32.0 ± 2.6 months (range 1–70 months), respectively. Cumulative LTP rates at 6 months and 1, 2 and 3 years post-RFA for all patients were 7.4, 14.5, 17.8 and 19.2%, respectively. The LTP rate for patients with mutant KRAS (27.8% [20/72]) was significantly higher than that in patients with wild-type KRAS (9.8% [8/82]; p = .004). The cumulative LTP rates at 6 months and 1, 2 and 3 years post-RFA were 4.0, 11.1, 11.1 and 11.1%, respectively, for patients with wild-type KRAS and 11.2, 18.4, 25.2 and 36.2%, respectively, for patient with mutant KRAS (p = .011). Univariate (p = .011) and multivariate analyses (p = .005) showed that KRAS genotype in liver metastases was predictive of LTP. Multivariate analysis also showed that ablation margin size (p< .001) and modified clinical risk score (CRS; p = .033) were independent prognostic factors for LTP.Conclusions: KRAS gene status of liver metastatic lesions was associated with LTP rates after RFA of CLM. Ablation margin size and modified CRS were also independent prognostic factors for LTP.

Does the Site of the Primary Affect Outcomes When Ablating Colorectal Liver Metastases with Radiofrequency Ablation?

To determine whether primary tumor side was a predictor of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) outcome in colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). The institutional review board approved this retrospective study. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients. From January 2007 to December 2013, 102 patients underwent RFA of metachronous CRLM were enrolled in this study with propensity score matching method. Recurrence rate (RR) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed between two patients cohorts with primary left-side colorectal cancer (LSCRC) or primary right-side colon cancer (RSCC). The total RR was 59.8% in all patients. Patients in LSCRC cohort had lower RR and non-local recurrence (NLR) rate than those in RSCC patients' cohort (49.0 vs 70.6%, p = 0.026 and 21.6 vs 41.2%, p = 0.033). Five-year OS was 14 and 30% for RSCC and LSCRC, respectively. There was a significant difference between two cohorts in median OS (29.4 vs 40.3months for RSCC and LSCRC, respectively, p = 0.042). Univariate analysis showed that primary tumor side, the number of liver metastases, tumor size, carcinoembryonic antigen level, differentiation, TNM stage, active chemotherapy and RFA boundary were significant in predicting OS. When these variables were subsequently entered in a multivariate model, RSCC (p < 0.001; hazard ratio [HR], 6.2) and tumor size (> 3cm) (p = 0.006; HR, 3.9) were significant. LSCRC and tumor size (≤ 3cm) are independent predictors of RFA in CRLM and yield the better oncologic outcomes.

Immediate and Long-term Results of Radiofrequency Ablation for Colorectal Liver Metastases.

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs) is a method developed in the last 15 years. It provides an acceptable control of the malignant process with lower risks compared to surgical resection. The aim of the study was to assess immediate and long-term results, including recurrence, survival, morbidity/mortality rates after RFA. Sixty-two cases with CRLMs were treated by RFA during open surgery (89 lesions). Patients were followed-up for a minimum of 36 months, with assessment of recurrences and survival rates at 1, 2 and 3 years, using computed tomography (CT) scan, contrast-enhanced ultrasound and tumor markers (carcinoembryonoc antigen, carbohydrate antigen-19.9). Local relapses, recurrences in other areas and survival rates at 1, 2 and 3 years suggest acceptable values comparative with liver resections in the first 2-3 years and demonstrated long-term limitations, despite the use of adjuvant chemotherapy. Major postoperative negative prognostic factors are tumor multicentricity and tumor's dimensions over 5 cm. RFA of CRLMs is a safe procedure with low rates of local relapses and recurrences, as well as acceptable survival rates, in the first 24-36 months post-procedure. It is recommended for patients with no indications for liver resection or having major resection risks.

Outcomes after resection and/or radiofrequency ablation for recurrence after treatment of colorectal liver metastases

Repeat liver resection for colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs) is possible in a limited number of patients, with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) as an alternative for unresectable CRLMs. The aim of this study was to analyse survival rates with these interventions. This was a database analysis of patients who underwent first and repeat interventions for synchronous and metachronous CRLMs between 2000 and 2013. Descriptive and survival statistics were calculated. Among 431 patients who underwent resection or RFA for CRLMs, 305 patients developed recurrences for which 160 repeat interventions (resection and/or RFA or ablative radiotherapy) were performed. In total, after 707 first or repeat interventions, 516 recurrences (73·0 per cent) developed, of which 276 were retreated curatively. At the time of first intervention, independent risk factors for death were lymph node-positive primary tumour (hazard ratio (HR) 1·40; P = 0·030), more than one CRLM (HR 1·53; P = 0·007), carcinoembryonic antigen level exceeding 200 ng/ml (HR 1·89; P = 0·020) and size of largest CRLM greater than 5 cm (HR 1·54; P = 0·014). The 5-year overall survival rates for liver resection and percutaneous RFA as first intervention were 51·9 and 53 per cent, with a median overall survival of 65·0 (95 per cent c.i. 47·3 to 82·6) and 62·1 (52·2 to 72·1) months, respectively. RFA had good oncological outcomes in patients with unresectable CRLMs. Radiofrequency ablation is progressively more applied with each additional intervention.

Current status and updates of radiofrequency ablation for colorectal liver metastasis

Colorectal cancer is a kind of common malignant tumor, the incidence of which appears to increase with the developments of social economy and change of life style. Liver metastasis occurred in about 50% of patients with colorectal cancer, as an important cause of death. In recent years, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has been used clinically to damage the hepatic metastatic carcinoma. With the characteristics of accuracy, micro-invasive trauma and repeatability, RFA has been extensively used as an effective local treatment. This paper discusses the indications of RFA for colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM), current status of RFA in unresectable and resectable CRLM, application of RFA in combine therapy for CRLM. Key words: Colorectal neoplasms; Liver metastases; Radiofrequency ablation

Radiofrequency ablation of unresectable colorectal liver metastases: trends in management and outcome during a decade at a single center.

BackgroundRadiofrequency ablation (RFA) is widely used for treatment of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM).PurposeTo evaluate the effect of increased experience in RFA of CRLM on morbidity and survival, and the trends in patient management and outcomes during the last decade.Material and MethodsHospital records of the initial 52 consecutive patients who underwent RFA (56 procedures/70 lesions) were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were divided into two groups according to time period of treatment, period I (2001–2006: n = 26) and period II (2007–2011: n = 26).ResultsConcomitant liver resection was performed in 15 patients in each period. Operative morbidity decreased from 47% to 19% (P = 0.047). Most complications were found in patients who underwent a concomitant liver resection and not related to the ablation per se. Local recurrence rate decreased from 19.4% to 12.9% (P = 0.526). At least one risk factor for recurrence was found in patients with local recurrence (n = 11): subcapsular localization (n = 4), tumor size >3 cm and subcapsular localization (n = 2), and perivascular localization (portal veins/hepatic veins) (n = 5). Median overall survival was 32 months in period I and 49 months in period II, whereas estimated 5-year survival was 19% and 36%, respectively (P = 0.09). Adjuvant chemotherapy was given to four patients (15.4%) in period I and 13 patients (50%) in period II (P = 0.017).ConclusionRFA alone or in combination with liver resection is a potentially curative treatment to selected patients with CRLM. Over time, the morbidity and survival have improved in RFA of CRLM. Although a possible effect of a learning curve should be taken into consideration in the appraisal of this improvement, it is more likely to be attributable to optimization of indication, development in surgical techniques, and increased use of perioperative chemotherapy.

Surgical resection for local recurrence after radiofrequency ablation for colorectal liver metastasis is more extensive than primary resection

Objective. As a minimally invasive modality, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has been increasingly applied not only for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma, but also for that of colorectal liver metastasis (CLM). However, RFA for CLM has been shown to be associated with a high local recurrence rate, and no optimal treatment for RFA failure has been established yet. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and outcome of surgical resection for local recurrence after RFA. Material and methods. A retrospective study of 17 patients, who underwent surgery for local recurrence after RFA for resectable CLM, was carried out. The surgical procedures involved in the actual surgery were compared with those envisioned for the primary resection if RFA had not been selected. Results. Surgical resection for RFA recurrence was more invasive than the envisioned surgical procedure in 10 cases (58%). In addition, the proportions of cases that required technically demanding procedures among the patients receiving surgery for RFA recurrence were higher than those in envisioned operations; major hepatectomy, eight cases [47%] versus two cases [12%] (p < 0.0205); excision and/or reconstruction of the major hepatic veins, three cases [18%] versus zero case [0%] (p = 0.035); excision of diaphragm: three cases [18%] versus zero case [0%] (p = 0.035). The 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were 92%, 45% and 45%, respectively. Conclusions. Surgical resection for RFA recurrence for CLM required more invasive and technically demanding procedures. Thus, RFA for CLM should be limited to unresectable cases, and patients with resectable CLM should be thoroughly advised not to undergo RFA, but rather surgical resection.

2:50 PM Abstract No. 91 - Factors affecting oncologic outcome after radiofrequency ablation of colorectal liver metastasis

Purpose To assess factors affecting oncologic outcomes of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in the management of colorectal liver metastases. Materials and Methods One-hundred-forty-nine patients (86 men and 63 women, median age: 61 years) underwent a total of 198 RF ablation sessions for the treatment of 218 lesions from January 2003 to March 2012. Technique effectiveness per lesion was evaluated at the 4-6-week post ablation CT and local tumor progression (LTP) at the ablation site was assessed reviewing subsequent scans. The endpoints of the study were: LTP-free survival and overall survival (OS) from the time of the ablation. Clinical factors such as: tumor size, prior hepatic resection, node positivity of the primary, time interval from primary resection to liver metastasis, number of tumors, presence of extrahepatic disease, pre and post ablation systemic and intraarterial chemotherapy were analyzed for their effect on outcomes. LTP-free survival and OS were calculated using Kaplan-Meier methodology. Factors affecting oncologic outcome were assessed in univariate and multivariate analysis. Results Median tumor size was 1.9 cm (range 0.5 to 5.7 cm). Complete ablation was demonstrated in 209 cases (technique effectiveness rate: 96%). Median overall survival was 35.43 months. One-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates were: 91%, 47% and 33%, respectively. On univariate analysis, as well as multivariate analysis tumor size over 3 cm (HR: 2.58, 95% CI: 1.47, 4.53; p=0.001) and not receiving systemic chemotherapy following RFA (HR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.4, 0.98; p=0.04) were independent predictors for shorter OS. Median LTP-free survival was 25 months. Size (p=0.01), prior systemic (p=0.02) and prior intraarterial chemotherapy (p=0.03) were independent factors for LTP-free survival in the univariate model, however only size retained its significance in the multivariate model (p=0.01). Conclusion Size of ablated tumor and post-ablation chemotherapy are associated with better oncologic outcomes after RFA of colorectal liver metastases.

Incidence and Treatment of Local Site Recurrences Following RFA of Colorectal Liver Metastases

Patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) who are ineligible for curative surgery are potential candidates for radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Although RFA has emerged as a well accepted and documented treatment modality, there are still some reservations because of initially high rates of local site recurrences (LSR). The aim of the present study was to evaluate LSR levels following RFA treatment, with a specific focus on re-treatment and survival. All patients ineligible for curative resection of CRLM and undergoing RFA alone or in combination with resection were prospectively included from July 2000 to December 2010 and retrospectively analyzed. Patients with untreatable extrahepatic disease were excluded. FDG PET-CT was conducted at 3-6 month intervals after RFA. Patients with LSR were evaluated for re-treatment. A total of 132 patients were treated with RFA, which was combined with resection in 64 patients. A total of 290 lesions were ablated, with a mean number of 2.19 per patient and a mean size of 2.2 cm. Median survival was 41 months, with a 3- and 5-year survival of, respectively, 60 and 30.8 %. Following initial RFA, 39 patients developed an LSR in 40 ablated lesions, and local recurrence was strongly related to lesion size. Re-treatment could be performed in 26/39 patients, of whom eight remained disease-free. Radiofrequency ablation can be applied to CRLM of less than 3 cm with curative intent. In the absence of extensive intrahepatic or extrahepatic disease, renewed treatment of local recurrences should be considered and is often successful.

Complementary Use of Resection and Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment of Colorectal Liver Metastases: An Analysis of 395 Patients

Liver resection and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) are two surgical options in the treatment of patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM). The aim of this study was to analyze patient characteristics and outcomes after resection and RFA for CLM from a single center. Between 2000 and 2010, 395 patients with CLM undergoing RFA (n = 295), liver resection (n = 94) or both (n = 6) were identified from a prospective IRB-approved database. Demographic, clinical and survival data were analyzed using univariate and multivariate analyses. RFA patients had more comorbidities, number of liver tumors and a higher incidence of extrahepatic disease compared to the Resection patients. The 5-year overall actual survival was 17 % in the RFA, 58 % in the Resection group (p = 0.001). On multivariate analysis, multiple liver tumors, dominant lesion >3 cm, and CEA >10 ng/ml were independent predictors of overall survival. Patients were followed for a median of 20 ± 1 months. Liver and extrahepatic recurrences were seen in 69 %, and 29 % of the patients in the RFA, and 40 %, and 19 % of the patients in the Resection group, respectively. In this large surgical series, we described the characteristics and oncologic outcomes of patients undergoing resection or RFA for CLM. By having both options available, we were able to surgically treat a large number of patients presenting with different degrees of liver tumor burden and co-morbidities, and also manage liver recurrences in follow-up.

Treatment of colorectal liver metastasis: Comparison of radiofrequency ablation and hepatic resection.

637 Background: Hepatic resection is the mainstay of management for colorectal liver metastases. But, the treatment for colorectal liver metastases requires a multidisciplinary therapeutic strategy. The aim of this study was to compare recurrence and survival rates for patients treated with hepatic resection or radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for colorectal liver metastases. Methods: Between July 2002 and September 2010, 52 patients underwent hepatic resection and 58 underwent RFA for synchronous or metachronous colorectal liver metastases. A retrospective analysis was performed. Patients with extrahepatic metastases were excluded. Results: The two groups had similar mean age, comorbid medical conditions, primary disease stage, and number of tumors. Preoperative median serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level was significantly higher in the resection group (13.8 ng/mL vs. 3.1 ng/mL; p = 0.001). Median diameter of main tumors was significantly greater in resection group (4.1 cm vs. 2.0 cm; p = 0.002). Recurrence rate after treatment was 46.2% (24/52) in the resection group and 70.7% (41/58) in the RFA group. Marginal recurrence after resection or RFA was observed in 7.6% (4/52) and 46.6% (27/58), respectively (p = 0.003). Median recurrence free survival (28.0 vs. 12.0 months; p = 0.007) and median overall survival (43.0 vs. 26.0 months; p = 0.023) were significantly longer in the resection group. Conclusions: Hepatic resection is the treatment of choice for colorectal liver metastases. RFA for colorectal liver metastases was associated with higher marginal recurrence rate and shorter recurrence free and overall survival.

Comparison of Radiofrequency Ablation and Resection for Hepatic Metastasis from Colorectal Cancer

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has been mostly used as a therapeutic alternative to hepatic resection for treating liver metastasis of colorectal cancer. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether there were differences in outcome between RFA and surgical resection in the treatment of colorectal cancer with liver metastases. We performed a retrospective analysis of 53 patients who underwent only hepatic resection or only RFA for colorectal liver metastases. Twenty-five patients who underwent hepatic resection were compared with 28 patients who underwent RFA for synchronous or metachronous liver metastases. The median CEA level at the time of diagnosis of liver metastases was significantly higher in the resection group (14.2 ng/mL vs. 2.8 ng/mL, p=0.002). The median size of main liver metastases was significantly larger in the resection group (4.0 cm vs. 2.05 cm, p=0.002). There was no difference in the percentage of patients experiencing major complication (one patient in each group). The marginal recurrence rate was significantly higher in the RFA group (p=0.004). Disease-free and overall survival were longer in the resection group (p=0.008 and 0.017, respectively). In multivariate analysis, only the type of treatment was a factor associated with disease-free and overall survival (p=0.004 and 0.007, respectively). Because of the high marginal recurrence rate, RFA shows an inferior outcome in comparison with surgical resection. Therefore, RFA should be considered for only selected patients with unresectable (by any means) disease or with high operative risk.

Radiofrequency ablation or percutaneous ethanol injection for the treatment of liver tumors

The liver is a common location of both primary and secondary malignancies. For unresectable liver cancer, many local ablative therapies have been developed. These include e.g., percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI), percutaneous acetic acid injection, radiofrequency ablation (RFA), cryoablation, microwave ablation, laser-induced thermotherapy, and high-intensity focused ultrasound. RFA has recently gained interest and is the most widely applied thermoablative technique. RFA allows more effective tumor control in fewer treatment sessions compared with PEI, but with a higher rate of complications. However, there are certain circumstances where PEI therapy represents a better strategy to control liver tumors than RFA, especially in situations where RFA is difficult, for example when large vessels surround the tumor. In the context of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), both RFA and PEI are feasible and of benefit in non-operable patients. RFA seems superior to PEI in HCC > 2 cm, and the combination of interventions may be of benefit in selected patients. Liver resection is superior to RFA for patients with HCC meeting the Milan criteria, but RFA can be employed in tumors ≤ 3 cm and where there is an increased expected operative mortality. In addition, some lines of evidence indicate that RFA and PEI can be employed as a bridge to liver transplantation. The use of RFA in colorectal liver metastases is currently limited to unresectable disease and for patients unfit for surgery. The aim of this article is to summarize the current status of RFA in the management of liver tumors and compare it to the cheap and readily available technique of PEI.

Clinical Applications of Radio-Frequency Ablation in Liver Metastasis of Colorectal Cancer

PurposeThe aim of this study is to evaluate long-term survival and prognostic factors for radio-frequency ablation (RFA) in colorectal liver metastases.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 35 colorectal liver metastases patients who underwent RFA between 2004 and 2008. We analyzed survival after RFA and prognostic factors for survival.ResultsOf the 35 patients, 23 patients were male and 12 were female. Their mean age was 62.40 ± 12.52 years. Mean overall survival was 38.8 ± 4.6 months, and mean progression free survival was 19.9 ± 3.4 months. Three- and 5-year overall survival rates were 42.7 ± 0.1% and 26.0 ± 0.1%, respectively. Three- and 5-year progression-free survival rates were 19.6 ± 0.1% and 4.9 ± 0.04%, respectively. Overall survival and progression-free survival were significantly improved in male and in patients with carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) ≤ 100 ng/mL, carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 ≤ 100 ng/mL, absence of extrahepatic disease, and a unilobar hepatic lesion. In addition, progression-free survival was improved in patients with a solitary hepatic lesion. On the multivariate analysis, significant survival factors were the absence of extrahepatic disease and the presence of a unilobar hepatic lesion.ConclusionRFA for colorectal liver metastases is an effective treatment option in male patients and in patients with CEA or CA19-9 ≤ 100, absence of extrahepatic disease, a solitary hepatic lesion, and a unilobar hepatic lesion.

Early PET/CT after radiofrequency ablation in colorectal cancer liver metastases: is it useful?

Background Morphologic imaging after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of liver metastases is hampered by an inflammatory response in the ablation margin, making the identification of local tumor progression (LTP) difficult. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of early 18F-FDG PET/CT scanning to monitor the effectiveness of RFA in colorectal liver metastases. Methods Twelve patients with 20 metastases were treated with RFA for colorectal liver metastases. They underwent PET/CT within 2 weeks before RFA and within 24 hours after RFA (so termed “early PET/CT”). PET/CT was repeated at 1, 3, and 6 months, and then every 6 months after ablation. The standard of reference was based on available clinical and radiological follow-up data. Results Early PET/CT revealed total photopenia in 16 RFA-treated metastases, which were found to be without residual tumor on the final PET/CT scan. Three RFA-treated metastases with focal uptake were identified as local tumor progression, which necessitated further treatment. One RFA-treated metastasis with rim-shaped uptake was regarded as inflammation. The results of the early PET/CT scanning were consistent with the findings of the final follow-up. Conclusions PET/CT performed within 24 hours after RFA can effectively detect whether residual tumor exists for colorectal cancer liver metastases. The results can guide further treatment, and may improve the efficacy of RFA.

Radiofrequency ablation of colorectal liver metastases downstaged by chemotherapy

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) continues to evolve, improving the potentials of this technique. It is now a widely used procedure in the treatment of patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases, increasing the number of potentially curable patients. To evaluate the long-term survival of patients treated by RFA for colorectal liver metastases after downstaging by systemic chemotherapy. In a retrospective review of our prospective colorectal liver metastasis RFA database, 36 patients (20 males, 16 females; median age 67 years) were identified during an 8-year period (1999-2007). All patients were initially unsuitable for local treatment, and referred to systemic chemotherapy by our multidisciplinary team. Multinodularity and/or location of tumor was the main cause of patients being unsuitable for local treatment. Chemotherapy mainly consisted of 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin combined with oxaliplatin or irinotecan. After downstaging with chemotherapy, patients were treated by RFA. Patients with extrahepatic disease were excluded from RFA treatment. Pre- and posttreatment evaluation was performed with multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) scans. The median time from diagnosis of hepatic metastases to first RFA was 10 months. A total of 158 tumors were treated with RFA during the study period. Median follow-up period was 27 months. The estimated median survival time after diagnosis of hepatic metastasis was 39 months, with a 5-year survival rate of 34%. In selected patients with colorectal liver metastases downstaged by chemotherapy, RFA is an important modality that may contribute to improved survival. Furthermore, all patients responding to systemic chemotherapy should be re-evaluated by a multidisciplinary team.

Hepatic resection of initially unresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer after hepatic arterial infusion of oxaliplatin and systemic 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin

e15015 Background: About 80% of patients (pts) presenting colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) are initially unresectable. A subgroup will become eligible for surgery after chemotherapy administration. Efficacy of hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) of oxaliplatin with systemic 5-Fluorouracil and leucovorin (LV5FU2) in with unresectable CRLM was previously demonstrated. This study was performed to evaluate the resection rate of pts with initially unresectable CRLM after oxaliplatin HAI and systemic LV5FU2. Methods: Patients treated in our hospital with oxaliplatin HAI and systemic LV5FU2 for unresectable CRLM from May 1999 to May 2007 were analyzed. Inclusion criteria were : unresectable CRLM, no extensive extrahepatic disease, HAI performed in our hospital, minimal follow up of 24 months. Eighty-seven pts were selected from a prospective database Results: Hepatic arterial infusion was delivered after previous systemic chemotherapy failure in 69 pts (80%). Main criterion for unresectability was massive liver involvement (80%). CRLM were synchronous and bilateral in respectively 85% and 90% of pts. The median number of oxaliplatin HAI cycles was 8 (0- 25). Thirty-one pts experienced technical problems with the arterial catheter, which was responsible for HAI withdrawal in seven. A total of 23 pts (26.4%) were operated, leading to resection and/or radiofrequency ablation of CRLM in 21 pts. No post-operative mortality was observed and the morbidity rate was 30%. The 3-year overall survival for patients operated was 72.5% versus 12% for non operated pts (p&lt;0.0001). After a median follow-up of 75 months [24–118], intra-hepatic recurrence occurred in 10 pts. Conclusions: Hepatic artery infusion of oxaliplatin and systemic LV5FU2 increase the resectability rate in pts with advance CRLM even after previous systemic chemotherapy failure. Future studies combining oxaliplatin HAI and recent IV chemotherapy are needing to achieve an increase disease-free survival. No significant financial relationships to disclose.