Radical Resection Of Cancer Research Articles

A clinical study of inferior mesenteric artery typing in laparoscopic radical resections with left colonic artery preservation of rectal cancer

ObjectivesAn investigation of the effects of different types of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) on laparoscopic left colic artery (LCA) radical resection of rectal cancer was conducted.MethodsClinical data were collected from 92 patients who underwent laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer with preservation of the LCA at Nantong University’s Second Affiliated Hospital. All patients underwent full-abdominal dual-energy CT enhancement examination before surgery and 3D post-processing reconstruction of the IMA. Two radiologists with >3 years of experience in abdominal radiology jointly conducted the examination. A total of three types of IMA were identified among the patients: IMA type I (the LCA arising independently from the IMA), type II (LCA and sigmoid colon artery [SA] branching from a common trunk from IMA), and type III (LCA, SA, and superior rectal artery [SRA] branching from the IMA at the same point). The baseline data, pathological results, and intra-operative and post-operative indicators of the groups were analyzed.ResultsThe proportions of type I, type II, and type III IMA were 58.70% (54/92), 18.48% (17/92), and 22.82% (21/92), respectively. IMA typing was consistent with the preoperative CT evaluation results. The intra-operative blood loss of type III IMA patients [median (interquartile spacing), M (P25, P75): 52.00 (39.50, 68.50) ml] was higher than that of type I and II IMA patients [35.00 (24.00, 42.00) and 32.00 (25.50, 39.50) ml, respectively] (P<0.05). The incidence of anastomotic fistula in type III IMA patients (4 cases, 19.05%) was higher than that in non-type III IMA patients (1 case, 1.41%) (X2=6.679, P=0.010). The incidence of postoperative complications among the three types of IMA was not significantly different (P>0.05).ConclusionsAmong rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic LCA preservation, type III IMA patients had more intraoperative bleeding and a higher incidence of postoperative anastomotic fistula. However, this did not increase the risk of overall postoperative complications.

Multidisciplinary treatment strategy for early colon cancer

Background: Treatment for early colon cancer has progressed rapidly with endoscopic resection and minimally invasive surgery. Selection of patients without risk of lymph node metastasis is necessary before deciding on endoscopic resection for early colon cancer treatment. We aimed to review the optimal multidisciplinary treatment strategies for early colon cancer, including endoscopy and surgery.Current Concepts: Pathological risk factors include histologic grade of cancer cell differentiation, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, tumor budding, and deep submucosal invasion. These risk factors for predicting lymph node metastasis are crucial for determining the treatment strategy of endoscopic excision and radical resection for early colon cancer. Prediction of the depth of invasion in early colon cancer using endoscopic optical assessments is vital to determine the appropriate treatment method for endoscopic or surgical resection. Furthermore, optical assessment of pit and vascular patterns is useful for estimating the depth of submucosal invasion using magnifying chromoendoscopy and narrow-band imaging endoscopy. Performing an endoscopic and pathologic evaluation of the risk factors for lymph node metastasis is imperative when selecting endoscopic or surgical resection. Endoscopic treatments include cold snare polypectomy, endoscopic mucosal resection, and endoscopic submucosal dissection. In addition, appropriate surgical treatment should be recommended for patients with early colon cancer with a high risk of lymph node metastasis.Discussion and Conclusion: A multidisciplinary approach should be recommended to establish an optimized treatment strategy, minimize the risk of complications, and obtain excellent oncologic outcomes via patienttailored treatment in patients with early colon cancer.

Routine pathologic evaluation of circular stapler anastomotic rings is not useful after resection for colorectal cancer: retrospective study and systematic review with meta-analysis.

BackgroundCircular staplers are commonly used for reconstruction after radical resection for colorectal cancer. Pathological analysis of the anastomotic rings is common practice, although the benefits are unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of routine histopathological analysis of anastomotic rings in an original series and in a systematic review of the literature.MethodThe retrospective study was performed at two university-associated academic hospitals in Winnipeg, Canada, including patients investigated for colorectal cancers (within 30 cm of the anal verge) who underwent resection between 2007 and 2020. The systematic review involved Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases, selecting for adult human studies involving analysis of anastomotic rings in elective colorectal cancer resections. The main outcome measure was the proportion of patients with cancer in the anastomotic ring specimens. The frequency of benign pathology findings and changes to patient management were also examined.ResultsOut of 673 eligible patients, 487 were included in the retrospective analysis. No patients had cancer within the anastomotic ring specimens. Twenty-five patients (5.1 per cent) had benign pathological findings within the anastomotic ring specimens, and patient management was never affected. In the systematic review, 27 articles were included in the final analysis out of 5848 records reviewed. The rate of cancer within anastomotic ring specimens was 0.34 per cent, and the rate of change in patient management was 0.19 per cent.ConclusionThe likelihood of finding cancer within anastomotic rings is rare and their histopathological examination seldom changes patient management.

Short-term efficacy, safety and survival of laparoscopic radical resection for colorectal cancer patients with bowel obstruction.

To investigate the short-term efficacy of laparoscopic radical resection for colorectal cancer with bowel obstruction and the effects of the surgery on inflammatory factors for improving the clinical treatment of the condition. The data of colorectal cancer patients presenting bowel obstruction (n=167) treated at our hospital from January 2019 to December 2020 were assessed. The patients were divided into a laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer group (LRRCC, n=90) and open surgery group (OP, n=77). Before treatment and on the 1st, 3rd, 5th, 7th and 15th day after treatment, their serum levels of pain factors, neuropeptide Y, prostaglandin E2 and nerve growth factor were measured by a serum biochemistry analyzer, their levels of inflammatory factors including C-reactive protein, interleukin 6 (IL-6), IL-8 and tumor necrosis factor-α by ELISA, and their amount of CD3+, CD4+ and CD8+ T cell subsets were measure by flow cytometry. Anorectal motility was assessed before and 4 and 8 weeks after treatment. Survival rates were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. On the 1st, 3rd, 5th, 7th and 15th day after treatment, compared with the OP group, the LRRCC group had lower levels of serum pain factors, inflammatory factors and CD8+T lymphocytes, while their numbers of CD3+ and CD4+ T lymphocytes subsets were significantly increased. Further, the LRRCC group had fewer complications and significantly higher survival rates, demonstrating better efficacy than the OP group. Laparoscopic radical resection was effective and achieved superior outcomes than open surgery in treating colorectal cancer patients with bowel obstruction.

Combined Prophylactic Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy and Intraoperative Radiotherapy for Localized Gastroesophageal Junction and Gastric Cancer: A Comparative Nonrandomized Study.

The peritoneum frequently is the only recurrence site after radical resection of gastric cancer. Data suggest that hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) and intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) reduce peritoneal recurrence and possibly improve survival for patients with resected gastric and serosal involvement. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of combining prophylactic HIPEC and IORT after radical resection of localized gastric cancer. In this retrospective study, the medical records of adult patients with histologically proven gastric/gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma who underwent radical resection with curative intent were evaluated for recurrence and survival according to whether they received prophylactic HIPEC and IORT. The eligibility criteria were met by 58 patients, 33 of whom underwent prophylactic HIPEC and IORT after radical surgery. Overall, 91% the HIPEC/IORT group and 72% of the surgery-only group had ≤pT3 disease. The median follow-up period was 26.6 months for the HIPEC/IORT group and 50.6 months for the surgery group. Locoregional recurrence occurred for six patients (18.1%) in the HIPEC/IORT group and five patients (20%) in the surgery-only group, with peritoneal metastasis (PM) occurring in respectively three (9%) and six (24%) patients. The median recurrence-free survival (RFS) duration was 23.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.5-39.9 months) for the HIPEC/IORT group versus 24.8 months (95% CI 0.0-51.1 months) for the surgery-only group (p = 0.88), and the corresponding 5-year overall survival (OS) estimates were 69% and 58%. Prophylactic HIPEC and IORT after radical surgery for localized gastric or gastroesophageal cancer did not improve RFS or OS for an unselected group of patients at risk for peritoneal recurrence.

Tumor thrombus formation in the right common iliac vein after radical proctectomy in a patient with rectal cancer: a case report

BackgroundIntravascular tumor thrombi are mainly found in patients with liver cancer or renal carcinoma but rarely occur in those with rectal cancer.Case presentationThis is a case report of a 58-year-old woman with a swollen right lower extremity 14 months after radical resection for rectal cancer. Although ultrasonography indicated the presence of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) located in the right common iliac vein, interventional angiography showed that a circular mass, considered a tumor thrombus, was located in the right common iliac vein. The tumor thrombus was cured by interventional therapy, and the pathological report confirmed that the metastatic tumor thrombus originated from the rectal cancer. The patient underwent concurrent chemoradiotherapy and systemic therapy. However, right lung, retroperitoneum, and 2nd sacral vertebral metastases were discovered during follow-up.ConclusionThe correct diagnosis of a tumor thrombus and its differentiation from DVT can prevent incorrect treatment and prolong the survival of patients with rectal cancer.

Safety analysis of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery for colorectal cancer.

SummaryThis study investigated the safety, feasibility, and clinical outcomes of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) by collecting clinical from patients who underwent complete laparoscopic radical resection for colorectal cancer versus those who underwent conventional laparoscopic radical resection for colorectal cancer. Patients with colorectal cancer were selected as the study sample and grouped according to the different surgical methods. A total of 182 patients were eligible for enrollment in the study, including 92 patients who underwent NOSES (NOSES group) and 90 patients who underwent conventional laparoscopic radical colorectal cancer surgery. In the NOSES group, a total of 14 cases were observed to have a postoperative abdominal infection, and the remaining 78 cases did not have an abdominal infection, which we refer to as the infected and uninfected groups in this paper for further analysis. There was no difference in surgical outcome between NOSES surgery and conventional laparoscopic surgery. Diabetes mellitus, prolonged drain retention, and prolonged operative time were risk factors for the development of abdominal infection in NOSES. In contrast, intraoperative use of specimen retrieval bags, use of transanal endoscopic operations, and intraoperative flushing of the abdominal cavity with dilute iodophenol were protective factors for the development of postoperative abdominal infections. NOSES for colorectal cancer is worth promoting because of its small trauma and quick postoperative recovery.

A case study of combined neoadjuvant chemotherapy and neoadjuvant immunotherapy in resectable locally advanced esophageal cancer

BackgroundThe prognosis of patients under existing neoadjuvant chemotherapy or neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy requires improvement. Whereas programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors have shown promising response in advanced esophageal cancer, they have not been used in the perioperative treatment of resectable locally advanced esophageal cancer. Whether immunotherapy can be incorporated into neoadjuvant therapy has became a challenging question for researchers.Case presentationWe present a case of a 65-year-old male who had a history of progressive dysphagia for approximately 1 month. He underwent pertinent studies including computed tomography (CT)，gastroscopy，and pathological biopsy resulting in a diagnosis of medium-low differentiated squamous carcinoma of the thoracic segment of the esophagus (cT2N2M0 stage III). After 4 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy, gastroscopy showed the lesion in the esophagus was no longer present. Subsequently, the patient received thoracoscopic radical resection of esophageal cancer and achieved a pathological complete response (pCR) in postoperative pathological evaluation. During the whole treatment, no adverse effect was recorded and to date no evidence of recurrence has been recorded.ConclusionOur report suggest that neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy not only improve the R0 resection and pCR rate in patients with resectable locally advanced esophageal cancer, but also the adverse effects are within the control range. However, the selection of therapeutic strategy, predictors of response to treatment, and interval time between neoadjuvant treatment and surgery still await more reliable evidence-based studies with large prospective samples.

Can an incomplete ERAS protocol reduce postoperative complications compared with conventional care in laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer? A multicenter observational cohort and propensity score-matched analysis.

BackgroundThe patients undergoing laparoscopic radical colorectomy in many Chinese hospitals do not achieve high compliance with the ERAS (enhanced recovery programs after surgery) protocol.MethodsThe clinical data from 1,258 patients were collected and divided into the non-ERAS and incomplete ERAS groups.ResultsA total of 1,169 patients were screened for inclusion. After propensity score-matched analysis (PSM), 464 pairs of well-matched patients were generated for comparative study. Incomplete ERAS reduced the incidence of postoperative complications (p = 0.002), both mild (6.7% vs. 10.8%, p = 0.008) and severe (3.2% vs. 6.0%, p = 0.008). Statistically, incomplete ERAS reduced indirect surgical complications (27,5.8% vs. 59, 12.7) but not local complications (19,4.1% vs. 19, 4.1%). The subgroup analysis of postoperative complications revealed that all patients benefited from the incomplete ERAS protocol regardless of sex (male, p = 0.037, 11.9% vs. 17.9%; female, p = 0.010, 5.9% vs. 14.8%) or whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy was administered (neoadjuvant chemotherapy, p = 0.015, 7.4% vs. 24.5%; no neoadjuvant chemotherapy, p = 0.018, 10.2% vs. 15.8%). Younger patients (<60 year, p = 0.002, 7.6% vs. 17.5%) with a low BMI (<22.84, 9.4% vs. 21.1%, p < 0.001), smaller tumor size (<4.0 cm, 8.1% vs. 18.1%, p = 0.004), no fundamental diseases (8.8% vs. 17.0%, p = 0.007), a low ASA score (1/2, 9.7% vs. 16.3%, p = 0.004), proximal colon tumors (ascending/transverse colon, 12.2% vs. 24.3%, p = 0.027), poor (6.1% vs. 23.7%, p = 0.012)/moderate (10.3% vs. 15.3%, p = 0.034) tumor differentiation and no preoperative neoadjuvant radiotherapy (10.3% vs. 16.9%, p = 0.004) received more benefit from the incomplete ERAS protocol.ConclusionThe incomplete ERAS protocol decreased the incidence of postoperative complications, especially among younger patients (<60 year) with a low BMI (<22.84), smaller tumor size (<4.0 cm), no fundamental diseases, low ASA score (1/2), proximal colon tumors (ascending/transverse colon), poor/moderate differentiation and no preoperative neoadjuvant radiotherapy. ERAS should be recommended to as many patients as possible, although some will not exhibit high compliance. In the future, the core elements of ERAS need to be identified to improve the protocol.

Chinese expert consensus on prevention and treatment of complications related to digestive tract reconstruction after laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer (2022 edition)

According to the different tumor locations and stages of gastric cancer, distal radical gastrectomy, radical total gastrectomy and proximal radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer are respectively selected in clinical practice. Regardless of the type of radical gastrectomy, digestive tract reconstruction is of great importance to gastrectomy, and it is also susceptible to related surgical complication. The occurrence of surgical complications directly affects the efficacy and postoperative quality of life, and even leads to death, resulting in serious consequences of giving up all previous efforts! Therefore, in the era of laparoscopic surgery, how to safely perform digestive tract reconstruction to reduce the occurrence of related complications, and how to properly and effectively deal with complications will be helpful to improve the overall level of gastric cancer treatment in China. This consensus is mainly aimed at the complications that occur during the process of digestive tract reconstruction and in the recent postoperative period. From the aspects of causes, preventive measures and treatment measures, after extensive review of data and combination with clinical practice, the opinions of domestic authoritative experts have been repeatedly collected and discussed. Finally, an expert consensus was formed, which provided an effective reference for Chinese surgeons to improve the prevention and treatment of complications of gastrointestinal reconstruction after radical resection of gastric cancer.

Clinical Observation on Nursing Intervention in Operating Room for Radical Resection of Colorectal Cancer

Clinical Observation on Nursing Intervention in Operating Room for Radical Resection of Colorectal Cancer

Effect of High-quality Nursing Intervention in Operation Room on Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Radical Resection

Effect of High-quality Nursing Intervention in Operation Room on Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Radical Resection

Analysis of the Effect of Fast Recovery Surgery Concept on Perioperative Nursing Care of Patients with Radical Resection of Cervical Cancer and Its Influence on Psychological Status.

Objective To explore the applied effect of fast-track surgery concept in the perioperative nursing of patients undergoing radical cervical cancer surgery and its influence on mental state. Methods The clinical data of 110 patients undergoing radical cervical cancer surgery in our hospital from May 2015 to May 2017 were retrospectively analyzed, and they were randomly divided into a research group (n = 55) and a reference group (n = 55). The reference group received routine clinical nursing, and the research group received fast-track surgical nursing. Then, we compared their nursing effect and influence on the mental state of patients in the two groups. Results The Karnofsky performance status (KPS) scores of patients in the two groups after intervention were significantly lower than those before the intervention (P < 0.001), and after intervention, patients in the research group had significantly lower KPS scores as compared to patients in the reference group (P < 0.001). There was a significant decrease in the self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) scores and self-rating depression scale (SDS) scores of patients in the two groups after intervention in comparison with before intervention (P < 0.001), and patients in the research group after intervention had significantly lower SAS and SDS scores compared to the reference group (P < 0.001). Patients in the research group spent short time on expelling gas, eating, and getting out of bed as compared to the reference group (P < 0.001); after intervention, compared to patients in the reference group, patients in the research group had significantly higher scores in cognitive function, emotional function, social function, and physical function (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in IgA, IgM, and IgG levels before intervention (P > 0.05). After intervention, the IgA, IgM, and IgG levels of patients in the two groups were all lower than before intervention, and patients in the research group had significantly higher IgA, IgM, and IgG levels as compared to the reference group (P < 0.001); the complication rate of patients in the research group was significantly lower than that in the reference group (P < 0.05). Conclusion The fast-track surgery concept effectively helps improve the negative emotion of patients, shorten recovery time, improve quality of life, and reduce the impact on immune function in the radical cervical cancer surgery, and it is worthy of promotion and application, with a high safety.

Efficacy of Laparoscopic Radical Resection Combined with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Its Impact on Long-Term Prognosis of Patients with Colorectal Cancer.

Objective The aim of the study is to examine the efficacy of laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and its impact on the overall prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer (CC). Methods A total of 80 CC patients hospitalized and treated at our hospital between November 2019 and June 2021 were selected at random as research subjects and divided equally into two groups: the surgical group (n = 40) and the combination group (n = 40). Patients in the surgical group were treated with laparoscopic radical resection, while patients in the combination group received laparoscopic radical resection combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The two groups were compared in terms of surgery-related indicators, tumor markers (serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), glycoprotein 199 (CA199), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP9)), postoperative complications, and 1–3 years postoperative survival rate and recurrence rate. Results The surgical duration of the combination group was significantly shorter than the surgical group (P < 0.05). No significant differences were found in intraoperative blood loss, time to get out of bed, exhaust time, or hospital stay between the two groups (P < 0.05). In the combination group, serum tumor markers (carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 199 (CA199), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP9)) were markedly lower than those in the surgical group (P < 0.05). The combination group exhibited fewer postoperative complications than those in the operation group (P < 0.05). In the combination group, the 1–3 years postoperative survival rate was higher, while the 1–3 years postoperative recurrence rate was considerably lower than that in the surgical group (P < 0.05). Conclusion CC patients benefit well from laparoscopic radical resection coupled with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The approach is efficient in lowering blood tumor markers in patients and lowering the risk of surgery-related complications. It has the potential to enhance patients' long-term prognoses, allowing them to live longer and lower their chance of recurrence.

Effects of serratus anterior plane block and thoracic paravertebral nerve block on analgesia, immune function and serum tumor markers in patients after thoracoscopic radical resection of lung cancer.

ABSTRACTWe aimed to assess the effects of serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) and thoracic paravertebral nerve block (TPVB) on analgesia, immune function and serum tumor markers in patients after thoracoscopic radical resection of lung cancer. A total of 132 patients enrolled from February 2019 to November 2020 were prospectively selected and randomly divided into 3 groups (n=44). Control group received general anesthesia. After induction of general anesthesia, TPVB or SAPB group was given TPVB or SAPB. Their clinical data, operation conditions, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score, immune function, serum tumor markers and adverse reactions were compared. TPVB and SAPB groups had lower dosage of sufentanil during operation, later time of first pressing patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCA) pump after operation and smaller number of pressing PCA pump within 48 h after operation than those of control group (P<0.05). VAS scores at rest and coughing decreased 6 and 12 h after operation in TPVB and SAPB groups compared with that in control group (P<0.05). Cluster of differentiation 3 (CD3)+, CD4+ and CD4+/CD8+ ratio were higher, while CD8+ was lower 24 and 48 h after operation in TPVB and SAPB groups than those of control group (P<0.05). TPVB and SAPB groups had lower serum tumor marker levels 24 h after operation than those of control group (P<0.05). The three groups had similar incidence rates of adverse reactions (P>0.05). SAPB and TPVB can markedly improve postoperative analgesic effect, enhance immune function and decrease serum tumor marker levels in patients receiving thoracoscopic radical resection of lung cancer, without increasing adverse reactions. However, TPVB may puncture the pleura.

Prognostic Value of Mesorectal Lymph Node Micrometastases in ypN0 Rectal Cancer After Chemoradiation.

More than 25% of patients with node-negative colorectal cancer experience a recurrent disease even after curative surgery. This suggests the existence and oncologic influence of micrometastasis in regional lymph nodes or in distant organs. The objective of this study was to identify mesorectal lymph node micrometastases using an immunohistochemical analysis and to determine its prognostic value in node-negative rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation. A total of 91 patients who received preoperative chemoradiation and radical resection for rectal cancer were included. Based on conventional hematoxylin and eosin staining, all patients had a node-negative disease. Mesorectal lymph nodes from resected specimens were re-evaluated to detect micrometastases by immunohistochemistry using anticytokeratin antibody AE1/AE3. The clinicopathologic data were collected from a prospectively maintained database of colorectal cancer patients and analyzed retrospectively. Micrometastases of mesorectal lymph nodes were detected in nine patients (9.9%). The three-year overall survival was similar regardless of micrometastasis (88.9% in the positive group versus 90.7% in the negative group, P=0.681); however, the three-year disease-free survival was significantly poorer in the patients with micrometastases (40.0% versus 84.2%, P=0.001). In the multivariate analysis, the advanced pT category (ypT3/T4 versus ypT0: hazard ratio [HR] 10.477, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.102-99.594, P=0.041) and micrometastases in mesorectal lymph nodes (HR 5.655, 95% CI 1.837-17.409, P=0.003) were independent prognostic factors for disease-free survival. In node-negative rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiation, immunohistochemically detected micrometastases of mesorectal lymph nodes were significantly correlated with poor disease-free survival.

Surgical outcomes and sexual function after laparoscopic colon cancer surgery with transvaginal versus conventional specimen extraction: A retrospective propensity score matched cohort study

BackgroundNatural orifice specimen extraction has been shown to reduce postoperative pain and wound complications, and provide better cosmetic outcome. However, whether transvaginal specimen extraction affects sexual function remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to investigate the short-term outcomes, sexual function, cosmetic outcomes and prognosis after colon cancer surgery with transvaginal specimen extraction. MethodThis study was a propensity score-matched comparative retrospective study, based on prospectively collected data in a single center. This study included 70 pairs of propensity score-matched female patients who underwent laparoscopic curative resection for stage I-III colon cancer with transvaginal specimen extraction and conventional specimen extraction between November 2015 and November 2020. Covariates used in the propensity score included age, tumor diameter, tumor differentiation, T stage and American Joint Committee on Cancer stage. Outcome measures included postoperative complication, postoperative sexual function, cosmetic result, disease-free survival and overall survival. ResultsPatients in transvaginal group were administered with less additional analgesics (P = 0.008), and had fewer wound complications (P = 0.028). None of patient in the two groups underwent anastomotic leakage, incisional disruption or vaginal fistula. The baseline pre-operative Female Sexual Function Index scores in two groups were the same, and no difference was found in postoperative score between the two groups (P = 0.790). The cosmetic score was significantly better in transvaginal group than that of conventional laparoscopy group (P = 0.000). During the follow-up period, there were no differences in OS or DFS between the two groups (P = 0.658, P = 0.663). ConclusionsCompared with laparoscopic colon cancer radical resection with specimen extraction, transvaginal specimen extraction is oncologically safe, brings better short-term outcomes, improved cosmetic results and has limited adverse effect on female's sexual function. This procedure can be further carried out in more appropriate patients.

Expression and Clinical Significance of Serum Krüppel-Like Factor 7 (KLF7) in NSCLC Patients.

Nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a serious threat to the life and health of patients with high incidence rate and mortality. The present research was to assess the relationship between the serum Krüppel-like factor 7 (KLF7) level and the recurrence and metastasis of NSCLC patients. 150 patients with NSCLC treated by thoracoscopic radical resection of lung cancer in our hospital from January 2016 to February 2017 were selected. As the control group, 148 healthy people who went to the hospital for physical examination in the same period were screened. The expression levels of serum KLF7 in the observation group and the control group were compared and analyzed. According to the level of KLF7 expression, the patients in the observation group were divided into KLF7 high expression group (≥258.6 ng/L, n =75) and KLF7 low expression group (<258.6 ng/L, n =75). The 3-year recurrence and metastasis rate of patients in each group was compared and analyzed. It was found the concentration of serum KLF7 in peripheral blood of NSCLC (2.25 ± 0.65) ng/ml was significantly higher than that in healthy population (1.42 ± 0.38) ng/ml (P < 0.05). The expression level of serum KLF7 was not related to gender, age, smoking history, and tumor diameter of NSCLC patients (P > 0.05), but related to the degree of differentiation and TNM stage of NSCLC patients (P < 0.05). Univariate analysis showed that the degree of differentiation, TNM stage, and KLF7 were significantly correlated with 3-year recurrence and metastasis of NSCLC patients (P < 0.05). Cox regression analysis showed that low degree of differentiation, TNM stage IIIa, and KLF7 were independent risk factors for recurrence and metastasis in NSCLC patients in 3 years (P < 0.05). Taken together, the expression level of serum KLF7 in patients with NSCLC is significantly increased, which is an independent risk factor for recurrence and metastasis in 3 years, and is worthy of clinical application.

Long-term oncologic outcomes of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery versus conventional laparoscopic-assisted resection in the treatment of rectal cancer: a propensity-score matching study

BackgroundNatural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) has been increasingly applied in radical surgery of abdominal and pelvic organs, but it is still in the exploratory stage. There is insufficient evidence to prove its efficacy.MethodsFrom January 2013 to June 2017, a total of 351 patients diagnosed with rectal cancer were eventually included in this study. Patients who underwent NOSES were assigned to the NOSES group, while patients undergoing conventional laparoscopic assisted resection were assigned as to the LAP group. Propensity score matching was used to align clinicopathological features between the two groups.ResultsFrom the perioperative data and postoperative follow-up results of both groups, patients in the NOSES group had less intraoperative bleeding (47.0 ± 60.4 ml vs 87.1 ± 101.2 ml, P = 0.011), shorter postoperative gastrointestinal recovery (50.7 ± 27.3 h vs 58.6 ± 28.5 h, P = 0.040), less postoperative analgesic use (36.8% vs 52.8%, P = 0.019), lower postoperative pain scores (P < 0.001), lower rate of postoperative complications (5.7% vs 15.5%, P = 0.020), more satisfaction with body image (P = 0.001) and cosmesis (P < 0.001) postoperatively. The NOSES group had a higher quality of life. Moreover, there was no significant difference in overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) between the two groups.ConclusionNOSES could be a safe and reliable technique for radical resection of rectal cancer, with better short-term outcomes than conventional laparoscopy, while long-term survival is not significantly different from that of conventional laparoscopic surgery.

Efficacy of stereotactic body radiation therapy for locoregional recurrent pancreatic cancer after radical resection.

ObjectiveThis study aimed to analyze the efficacy and toxicity of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for locoregional recurrent pancreatic cancer after radical resection.MethodsPatients with locoregional recurrent pancreatic cancer after surgery treated with SBRT in our institution were retrospectively investigated from January 2010 to January 2020. Absolute neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) recorded at pretreatment were analyzed. Endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and cumulative incidences of local failure (LF) and metastatic failure (MF).ResultsA total of 22 patients received SBRT with a median prescribed dose of 40 Gy (range of 30-50 Gy)/4 to 7 fractions. The median OS of all patients was 13.6 months (95% CI, 9.6-17.5 months). 0-1 performance status (HR 12.10, 95% CI 2.04-71.81, P=0.006) and ≤2.1 pre-SBRT NLR (HR 4.05, 95% CI 1.21-13.59, P=0.023) were significant predictors of higher OS on multivariable analysis. The median progression-free survival (PFS) of the cohort was 7.5 months (95% CI, 6.5-8.5 months). The median time to LF and MF were 15.6 months and 6.4 months, respectively. The rate of MF as a first event was higher than that of first event LF. Pain relief was observed in all patients (100%) 6 weeks after SBRT. In terms of acute toxicity, grade 1 including fatigue (6, 27.3%), anorexia (6, 27.3%), nausea (4, 18.2%) and leukopenia (4, 18.2%) was often observed. No acute toxicity of grade 4 or 5 was observed. In terms of late toxicity, no treatment-related toxicity was found during follow-up.ConclusionThis study showed that SBRT can significantly reduce pain, effectively control local tumor progression, and have acceptable toxicity for patients with locoregional recurrence after radical resection of primary pancreatic cancer. Good performance status and lower pre-SBRT NLR were associated with improved overall survival.