To evaluate the changes in cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) characteristics and investigate the predictors of reverse left ventricular remodeling (r-LVR) in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. Eighty-six STEMI patients (median 56 years) were retrospectively studied. The patients were divided into r-LVR and without r-LVR groups. CMR analysis included LV volume, infarct characteristics, and global and regional myocardial function. The strain and displacement were assessed by CMR-feature tracking. The predictors of r-LVR were analyzed by the logistic regression method. There were 37 patients in the r-LVR group and 49 patients in the without r-LVR group. At initial CMR, there was no difference in LV volume and global cardiac function between the two groups. However, the infarct zone radial and longitudinal displacements were higher in the r-LVR group (p< 0.05, respectively). At the second CMR, the r-LVR group showed higher LVEF, lower LV volume, and total enhanced mass (all p< 0.05). The infarct zone radial and circumferential strains and radial displacement were higher in the r-LVR group (all p< 0.05). The r-LVR group had better recovery of myocardial injury and function. Of note, microvascular obstruction (MVO) mass (odds ratio: 0.779 (0.613-0.989), p= 0.041) and infarct zone peak longitudinal displacement (PLD) (odds ratio: 1.448 (1.044-2.008), p= 0.026) were independent predictors of r-LVR. At initial CMR, there were no differences in global cardiac function between the two groups, but infarct zone displacements were higher in the r-LVR group. The r-LVR group had better recovery of cardiac function. In addition, MVO mass and infarct zone PLD were independent predictors of r-LVR. Our study assessed changes in cardiac structure, function, and tissue characteristics after STEMI by CMR, investigated the best predictors of r-LVR in STEMI patients, and laid the foundation for the development of new parameter-guided treatment strategies for STEMI patients. • At initial CMR, the reverse left ventricular remodeling (r-LVR) group had less myocardial damage and higher infarct zone displacement, but there were no differences in global function between the two groups. • Both groups showed recovery of myocardial injury and cardiac function over time, but the r-LVR group had less enhanced mass and better cardiac function compared to the without r-LVR group at the second CMR. • Microvascular obstruction mass and infarct zone peak longitudinal displacement by cardiac magnetic resonance feature-tracking were significant predictors of r-LVR in STEMI patients.