Next article FreeThe Futility of Marginal UtilityE. H. DowneyE. H. Downey Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Journal of Political Economy Volume 18, Number 4Apr., 1910 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/251690 Views: 360Total views on this site Citations: 14Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1910 The University of Chicago PressPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:David C. Dawson Searching for laws of economics: causality, conservation, and ideology, American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology 320, no.33 (Mar 2021): C428–C447.https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.00324.2020Kiattichai Kalasin, Alvaro Cuervo‐Cazurra, Ravi Ramamurti State ownership and international expansion: The S‐curve relationship, Global Strategy Journal 10, no.22 (Apr 2019): 386–418.https://doi.org/10.1002/gsj.1339Arie Sherman, Tal Shavit The Thrill of Creative Effort at Work: An Empirical Study on Work, Creative Effort and Well-Being, Journal of Happiness Studies 19, no.77 (Jul 2017): 2049–2069.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-017-9910-xCraufurd D. Goodwin Economics and Psychology: Why the Great Divide?, History of Political Economy 48, no.suppl_1suppl_1 (Dec 2016): 71–169.https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-3619250Udo Konradt, Michaéla C. Schippers, Yvonne Garbers, Corinna Steenfatt Effects of guided reflexivity and team feedback on team performance improvement: The role of team regulatory processes and cognitive emergent states, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 24, no.55 (Jan 2015): 777–795.https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2015.1005608Marek Hudík Homo Economicus and Homo Stramineus, Prague Economic Papers 24, no.22 (Jan 2015): 154–172.https://doi.org/10.18267/j.pep.506R. Mazzoleni, R. R. Nelson An interpretive history of challenges to neoclassical microeconomics and how they have fared, Industrial and Corporate Change 22, no.66 (Aug 2013): 1409–1451.https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtt031Thomas I. Palley The Relative Permanent Income Theory of Consumption: A Synthetic Keynes–Duesenberry–Friedman Model, Review of Political Economy 22, no.11 (Jan 2010): 41–56.https://doi.org/10.1080/09538250903391954Roberta Muramatsu The death and resurrection of 'economics with psychology': remarks from a methodological standpoint, Revista de Economia Política 29, no.11 (Mar 2009): 62–81.https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-31572009000100004Roger S. Mason A Pathfinding Study of Consumption, Journal of Macromarketing 20, no.22 (Jul 2016): 174–177.https://doi.org/10.1177/0276146700202007Roger Mason The Social Significance of Consumption: James Duesenberry’s Contribution to Consumer Theory, Journal of Economic Issues 34, no.33 (Jan 2016): 553–572.https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2000.11506294Malcolm Rutherford Understanding Institutional Economics: 1918–1929, Journal of the History of Economic Thought 22, no.33 (Jun 2009): 277–308.https://doi.org/10.1080/10427710050122521Robert Cherry Biology, Sociology And Economics-An Historical Analysis *, Review of Social Economy 38, no.22 (Jul 2006): 141–154.https://doi.org/10.1080/00346768000000002Robert Cherry Racial Thought and the Early Economics Profession, Review of Social Economy 34, no.22 (Dec 2006): 147–162.https://doi.org/10.1080/00346767600000003