Racial Stratification Research Articles

Consistent Divisions or Methodological Decisions? Assessing the U.S. Racial Hierarchy Across Outcomes.

Scholars have offered a range of perspectives on the twenty-first century racial landscape with little consensus about either the current state of the U.S. racial hierarchy or its future trajectory. We offer a more comprehensive assessment, using data from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health (Add Health) to study racial stratification across a number of socioeconomic outcomes. We pay particular attention to the robustness of results across different categorization schemes that account for self-identification and interviewer classification, as well as racial fluidity. Although we observe that White and Asian Americans generally have the best socioeconomic outcomes, on average, while Black Americans and American Indians have the worst, we also find meaningful differences in patterns of stratification both across outcomes and depending on how race is operationalized. These differences in stratification are reflected in the estimated number of strata as well as the rank order of racial categories. Our results suggest that ongoing debates about the nature of the U.S. racial hierarchy can be partly explained by methodological decisions about which outcomes to study and how best to measure race.Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12552-021-09351-2.

The Life Course Origins of the Race Disparity in Cognitive Functioning in Brazil

Background: Cognitive health is a major concern for understanding population health in Brazil. Race inequalities have been found for several health outcomes but less is known about older adult cognitive health. Health inequalities have been tied to several life course factors, but less is known about how the racial stratification in Brazil may contribute to race disparities in cognitive health. Method: Data come from the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Aging. We used nested regression models to examine the life course origins of the race differences in cognitive functioning. Results: Whites had better cognitive functioning than non-Whites. Education reduced these differences by about half. Health behaviors and cardiometabolic conditions had little to no impact. Discussion: Race differences in cognitive functioning in Brazil are in large part attributable to educational opportunities. These finding point to the importance of cognitive development in childhood to understand racial disparities in later life cognitive health.

Racial Stratification and School Segregation in the Suburbs: Evidence from Los Angeles County

Abstract Suburbanization helped fuel neighborhood and school segregation during the twentieth century, but many American suburbs have dramatically diversified since. How do White suburbanites respond? With residential mobility declining and educational choice increasing, White suburban families may emulate their core-city counterparts, leveraging school enrollment to buffer their children from disadvantaged minorities living nearby. Yet recent research suggests proximate nontraditional school options (e.g., magnet, charter, private) are a key ingredient facilitating this minority avoidance strategy, and they are scarce in the suburbs. I propose that strong racial preferences spur White suburban families living amongst Black and Latino children to enact them even in unfavorable circumstances: by sending children long distances to nonassigned schools. Logistic regressions employing Los Angeles Family and Neighborhood Survey data on over 2,000 children linked to administrative data confirm this expectation. Spatial stratification research should supplement its longstanding focus on city-to-suburb residential flows and core-city educational flows out of traditional public schools with sharper scrutiny of suburban school sorting as a potential third path of segregation. This selection process may reveal racial preferences to be even stronger—and educational opportunity structures more malleable—than often assumed.

Trends in the Incidence of Early-Onset Colorectal Adenocarcinoma Among Black and White US Residents Aged 40 to 49 Years, 2000-2017

Early-onset colorectal cancer incidence rates are rising faster in White individuals than Black individuals. However, prior National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) racial stratification analyses used smaller SEER 13 databases, combined patients under age 50 years, did not stratify by sex, and did not focus on adenocarcinoma histologic subtypes (screening target). To perform a race- and sex-stratified adenocarcinoma incidence rate analysis in individuals aged 40 to 49 years using larger SEER 18 databases with expanded race data to better understand the colorectal cancer burden in those at or approaching screening age. This cross-sectional study used 2000 to 2017 SEER 18 annual age-adjusted colorectal cancer incidence rates stratified by anatomic subsite (colon or rectum), adenocarcinoma histology, race (non-Hispanic Black or non-Hispanic White), and sex for individuals aged 40 to 49 years, and yearly annual percent change (APC) incidence rates were calculated. Annual rate ratios (ARRs) between subgroups were determined. Statistical analysis was performed from January to March 2021. Early-onset colorectal cancer incidence rates, APCs, and ARRs. In this study, a total of 46 728 colorectal cancer cases were identified in 45 429 patients aged 40 to 49 years from 2000 to 2017. Among the 45 429 patients included in this study, 6480 (14.2%) were Black and 27 426 (60.4%) were White; the mean (SD) age was 45.5 (2.8) years. Among White individuals aged 40 to 49 years, colorectal adenocarcinoma incidence rates increased from 19.6 per 100 000 person-years in 2000 to 25.2 per 100 000 person-years in 2017 (APC, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.3 to 1.9). Among Black individuals aged 40 to 49 years, colorectal adenocarcinoma incidence rates were not significantly changed (26.4 per 100 000 person-years in 2000 and 25.8 per 100 000 person-years in 2017 [APC, -0.03; 95% CI, -0.5 to 0.5]). There were no significant differences in ARRs of absolute colorectal incidence rates between White and Black individuals from 2014 to 2017. Rectal-only absolute adenocarcinoma incidence rates in Black and White individuals remained similar from 2000 to 2008 but significantly diverged in 2009. As of 2017, rectal absolute incidence rates were 39% higher among White individuals than among Black individuals with increasing APC (APC, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.6 to 2.8) whereas rectal adenocarcinoma incidence rates among Black individuals were decreasing, although the APC was not statistically significant (APC, -1.4; 95% CI, -2.6 to 0.1). Absolute colonic adenocarcinoma incidence rates remained higher in Black individuals. The study subgroups with the largest divergence in APCs were rectal adenocarcinoma in White vs Black women (APC of 2.2 [95% CI, 1.6 to 2.8] vs APC of -1.7 [95% CI, -3.6 to 0.3], respectively). This study found that colorectal adenocarcinoma incidence rates in people aged 40 to 49 years were increasing among White individuals but stabilized among Black individuals with absolute incidence rates becoming equivalent. Absolute rectal adenocarcinoma incidence rates were 39% lower in Black individuals with a widening disparity in rectal cancer between White and Black women. Possible contributors include introduction of a screening threshold of age 45 years in Black individuals in 2008. Although the average-risk screening age has now shifted to age 45 years in all racial groups, these data can help motivate real-world implementation of guidelines to maximize screening rates that have historically been suboptimal in younger individuals.

Toward an understanding of structural racism: Implications for criminal justice.

Racial inequality is a foundational feature of the criminal justice system in the United States. Here we offer a psychological account for how Americans have come to tolerate a system that is so at odds with their professed egalitarian values. We argue that beliefs about the nature of racism—as being solely due to prejudiced individuals rather than structural factors that disadvantage marginalized racial groups—work to uphold racial stratification in the criminal justice system. Although acknowledging structural racism facilitates the perception of and willingness to reduce racial inequality in criminal justice outcomes, many Americans appear willfully ignorant of structural racism in society. We reflect on the role of psychological science in shaping popular understandings of racism and discuss how to contribute more meaningfully to its reduction.

Impact of diverticular disease on prostate cancer risk among hypertensive men.

Prostate cancer (PCa) is a heterogenous disease with multiple etiological factors playing a role in its development. Recently, chronic and systemic inflammatory conditions such as inflammatory bowel disease were identified as key risk factors influencing its development. The study aimed to evaluate the relationship between diverticular disease (DD) (local and acute inflammation) and PCa. Hypertensive patients with DD and hypertensive controls were identified between 1995 and 2010 from the Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database. Cohorts were queried for PCa incidence through 2015. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used for determining independent predictors of PCa diagnosis. A total of 51,353 patients with DD and 111,541 controls were identified. In all, 6.26% of DD developed PCa, and 3.71% of controls developed PCa (p < 0.01). DD was a significant risk factor for PCa (OR: 1.27 CI: 1.19-1.34, p < 0.01). On subgroup analysis, the patients diagnosed with DD <50 years old had an OR of 3.39 for PCa (CI: 2.52-4.56, p < 0.01), age 50-59 had an OR of 2.12 (CI: 1.86-2.15, p < 0.01), and age 60-69 had an OR of 1.20 (CI: 1.10-1.31, p < 0.01). Finally, age and race stratification showed that white patients <50 had an OR of 2.56 (CI: 1.75-3.76, p < 0.01), while black patients <50 had an OR of 3.98 (CI: 2.61-6.07, p < 0.01). The trend in differing odds between these populations was the same for age groups 50-59 and 60-69. Our analysis shows that DD is associated with diagnosis of PCa in hypertensive men. Importantly, the earlier the diagnosis of DD, the higher the odds for development of PCa, particularly in black men.

Race and Ideology in a Pandemic: White Privilege and Patterns of Risk Perception during COVID-19

Drawing on a unique survey dataset of Californians collected during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic, this article examines how race and ideology shape perceptions of risk. Specifically, we position the pandemic as an “unsettled time” (Swidler 1986) and examine how different racialized groups made sense of the economic and health risks posed during this unprecedented period. We find that even when accounting for economic precarity and potential exposure to COVID-19, as well as for various other measures of social status, racialized minorities felt significantly more threatened by COVID-19 than did whites. Religion and political ideology mediated this relationship to some degree, but the racialized differences were substantial. Indeed, we find that even the most liberal whites reported being significantly less concerned about some COVID-19 risks than the most politically conservative of our Latinx and Black respondents. By linking the literature on race and racial stratification with research on risk and culture, we argue that whiteness facilitates a cognitive insulating effect vis-à-vis COVID-19 risks. We discuss the theoretical implications of our findings and conclude by highlighting the enduring importance of racialization, including various manifestations of white privilege, when assessing the social and cultural realities of crises on the ground.

The Future of Progressive Politics in a Post-Fordist World

The Future of Progressive Politics in a Post-Fordist World

Disrupting the Big Lie: Higher Education and Whitelash in a Post/Colorblind Era

James Baldwin (1998) described whiteness as “the big lie” of American society where the belief in the inherent superiority of white people allowed for, emboldened, and facilitated violence against People of Color. In the post-Civil Rights era, scholars reframed whiteness as an invisible, hegemonic social norm, and a great deal of education scholarship continues to be rooted in this metaphor of invisibility. However, Leonardo (2020) theorized that in a post-45 era of “whitelash” (Embrick et al., 2020), “post-colorblindness” is more accurate to describe contemporary racial stratification whereby whiteness is both (a) more visible and (b) increasingly appealing to perceived injuries of “reverse racism.” From this perspective, we offer three theoretical concepts to guide the future of whiteness in education scholarship. Specifically, we argue that scholars critically studying whiteness in education must explicitly: (1) address the historicity of whiteness, (2) analyze the public embrace of whiteness, and (3) emphasize the material consequences of whiteness on the lives of People of Color. By doing this, we argue that critical scholars of race in higher education will more clearly understand the changing nature of whiteness while avoiding the analytical trap of invisibility that is decreasingly relevant.

An Intersectional Approach to DIF: Do Initial Findings Hold across Tests?

ABSTRACT Differential Item Function (DIF) analysis is commonly employed to examine potential bias produced by a test item. Since its introduction DIF analyses have focused on potential bias related to broad categories of oppression, including gender, racial stratification, economic class, and ableness. More recently, efforts to examine the effects of oppression on valued life-outcomes have employed an intersectional approach to more fully represent a person’s identity and capture the multiple, and often compound, impacts of oppression. The study presented here replicated an intersectional approach to DIF analyses to examine whether findings from a previous study that focused on a single grade-level achievement test generalized to other subject areas and grade levels. Findings indicate that the use of an intersectional approach is more sensitive to detecting potential item bias and that this increased sensitivity holds across the subject areas and grade levels examined.

Family Structure, Risks, and Racial Stratification in Poverty

Abstract Family structure remains a dominant explanation for understanding racial inequality in poverty. Yet, empirical studies show family structure does not fully account for this association. We present racial stratification as an alternative perspective emphasizing the social construction of race and how race contributes to the unequal distribution of resources. To illustrate the link between racial stratification and poverty, we rely on risk research and conceptualize risk in terms of prevalences (the percentage of people with risks) and penalties (the probability of poverty associated with risks). We assess whether family structure and risks intersect by racialized groups, and if so, whether the penalties for risks among Black and Latinx mothers, relative to white mothers, converge (i.e., smaller gap in penalties) or diverge (i.e., larger gap in penalties). Using panel data, our results revealed Black mothers had higher risk prevalence than both Latinx and white mothers. Moreover, a dramatic divergence in the penalties for risks emerged between racialized groups whereby Black and Latinx mothers experience greater disadvantage from risks than white mothers, regardless of family structure. We conclude family structure is not only an oversimplified explanation but also contributes to obscuring structural and systemic sources of racial inequality in poverty.

Racial Family Configurations and Inequalities in Private School Enrollment Among Adopted Children.

This study uses data from the American Community Survey to examine the relationship between race, family configurations, and inequalities in private school enrollment among adoptees. We find that private school enrollment is higher in transracial than in same-race families. This disparity is driven by the outcomes of adoptees in transracial families with zero rather than one same-race parent. Among adoptees themselves, there are diverging patterns of racial stratification in same-race and transracial families. White adoptees in same-race families are more likely to be enrolled in private school than Black, Asian, or Hispanic adoptees in such families. However, among adoptees in transracial families, the highest odds of private school enrollment are found among Asians. Finally, we argue that our findings have important implications for understanding how kinship cues, compensation, and social disadvantage shape parental investment in adopted children.

Basketball, Books, and Brotherhood: Dewitt Clinton High School as Scholastic Model of Postwar Racial Progression and African American Leadership

In 1950, the City College of New York (CCNY) became the first racially-integrated team to win the national championship of college basketball. Three of the players on that team attended DeWitt Clinton High School in the Bronx, New York. At the time Clinton high school was one of the most academically-rigorous public schools in the city and the United States. During this postwar period Clinton annually sent nearly a third of its graduates to college, this at a time when the national average of high school completion stood at twenty percent. The unofficial school motto etched in yearbooks and the student paper was “college or bust.” Needless to say, DeWitt Clinton strongly encouraged its student body to attend college and for those who did not, they were pushed to excel beyond the limits of their chosen professions. This intellectually competitive academic environment was integrated and more than twenty-percent black. Like their contemporaries, black students were encouraged to pursue opportunities that seemed unthinkable in an era of racial stratification. As a result, Clinton produced a number of black students armed with the skills to navigate the terrain of prejudice and circumvent a number of social barriers. DeWitt Clinton high school was a model for interracial brotherhood while also fostering black leadership. Like Jackie Robinson, whom integrated Major League Baseball in 1947 with the Brooklyn Dodgers, the three black athletes who competed on the CCNY team were prepared for the transition of competing on a racially integrated college team, can be partially attributed to their secondary schooling at DeWitt Clinton. This article examines the racial climate of DeWitt Clinton during the postwar years when the three young men were in attendance and how it fostered a culture of Basketball, Books, and Brotherhood.

Racial Stratification Among Latinos in the Mortgage Market

Studies of the mortgage industry’s impact on racial stratification have long focused on racial disparities found between white and black homeowners. Ample research demonstrates that unequal access and treatment between white and black home seekers has created major differences in the type of loan products they are offered in the marketplace. While numerous studies also document disadvantaged Latino homebuyers, studies have yet to examine racial variation within the Latino population. This paper draws on annual data from the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA) from 2010 to 2017 to assess variation in racial disparities among Latinos in loan outcomes and compares them to Non-Latino whites, blacks, Asians, and Others. I show that loan rejections and high cost originations are highest among black Latinos and lowest among white and Asian Latinos. Other Latinos perform somewhere in the middle. These trends are particularly true when examining mortgage denials. When comparing Latino racial groups to Non-Latinos, the observed lending patterns provide evidence of a tri-racial hierarchy in the mortgage market.

Surviving Capitalism: Affordability as a Racial “Wage” in Contemporary Housing Markets

AbstractIn a time of growing inequality, analysts and commentators increasingly highlight the unaffordability of everyday living under capitalism as a convenient language for diagnosing today’s problems and devising policy solutions. This article reconsiders the notion of an “affordability crisis” by drawing on Du Bois’ conceptualization of the racial “wage” to theorize the uneven development of markets: a racial stratification process that renders capitalism affordable and livable for some non-elites, often whites, but not others. One of racism’s economic consequences is that it systematically produces affordability crises for market participants on the wrong side of the color line. Drawing on the literature of published studies on white suburbanization combined with historical evidence on the Community Reinvestment movement, this article illustrates the contrasting affordability politics in the homeowner and renter markets, which are divergent both in racial composition and in terms of their affordability to people without wealth. Ultimately, this article explains how and why marginalized groups undertake efforts to politically reconfigure the way markets work from the ground up, albeit through necessarily strained and improvisational means: as in community groups’ appropriation of tax shelters to finance affordable rental housing production, marking a precursor to policies subsequently adopted by mainstream officials and legislators.

What Makes Systemic RacismSystemic?

In this article, I clarify some components and expand a few underdeveloped ideas of theracialized social systemapproach to racial stratification. I divide the paper into three parts. In the first section, I explore the limitations of the figure of “the racist.” In the second part, I examine the problem of change. In the third part, which is the core of the paper, I discuss what makes “systemic racism” systemic. My main contention in this article is that the “systemic” in “systemic racism” means that we all participate in the reproduction of the racialized order. Furthermore, this reproduction depends fundamentally on behavior and actions that are normative, habituated, and often unconscious. Hence, systemic racism is the product of the behavior and practices of regular White folks rather than the “racists.” In the conclusion, I discuss the implications of my claims for further theory‐building, research, and the struggle for racial justice.

The Unequal Opportunity to Be Healthy: How Whole Foods Market's Wellness Program and Similar Models Create an Issue of Disparate Impact

With the enactment of the Affordable Care Act, employers were encouraged to develop wellness programs to promote the health of employees and combat rising healthcare costs. This Article uses the wellness program of Whole Foods Market as a case study in how these programs have a disparate impact on racial minority populations and thus serve to perpetuate racial stratification and inequality by offering better terms and/or conditions of employment to employees who exhibit desired health statuses.A claim of disparate impact under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act is established if a party demonstrates that the business practice in question, while neutral on its face, has a disparate impact on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin and the employer fails to demonstrate that the business practice is related to the job in question or is consistent with business necessity. Title VII does not prohibit employment practices that have a disparate impact on a protected class if the challenged policy differentiates on the basis of a conduct-based attribute thought to be within the control of the employee, i.e., a mutable characteristic.According to organizations such as the World Health Organization, the American Medical Association, and the American Psychological Association, socioeconomic status is a consistent and reliable predictor of a vast array of outcomes in a person’s life, including physical health. Given long-standing socioeconomic inequality in the United States, racial minority populations are statistically more likely to exhibit negative health statuses. This unfortunate reality has been highlighted by the disproportional impact the COVID-19 pandemic has had on racial minority populations. This Article addresses how Title VII fails to fulfill its mandate of employment equality by specifically addressing the lenient review of an employer’s business-necessity defense and how the consideration of health statuses as wholly mutable characteristics is inconsistent with reality given an analysis of behavioral and social determinants of health.This Article then calls for a reevaluation of the lenient review of employer’s business-necessity defense and a reframing of the mutability of health statuses to ensure Title VII fulfills its congressional mandate of equal employment opportunities for all.

Predicting Mobility: Who Is Forced to Move?

We use the 2013 American Housing Survey to examine which households are more likely to experience a forced move compared to a voluntary move. We examine how household vulnerability varies by racial and socioeconomic stratification, as well as other household demographics among homeowners and renters. We analyze household-level predictors of experiencing an inclusively defined forced move, including moves caused by disasters, private and government displacement, and eviction (for renters) or foreclosure (for homeowners). Comparing an inclusive definition of displacement to voluntary mobility, we find that lower levels of education, income, and the presence of a disabled household member increase the likelihood of displacement for homeowners. Among renters, the presence of children, older households, and being native-born increase the odds of displacement, but a female-headed household reduces them. When examining type-specific displacement, we find variation in who is most susceptible to experience a forced move.

THE PUZZLE OF RACIAL INEQUALITY IN CUBA, 1980s–2010s

AbstractContrasting perspectives on racism and racial inequality collide in contemporary Cuba. On the one hand, government officials argue that Cuba is a racially egalitarian country; though vestiges of historical racism subsist, systematic discrimination does not. On the other hand, social movement actors and organizations denounce that racism and discrimination are systemic and affect large sectors of the Afro-Cuban population. To draw these visions into scholarly dialogue, our analytic strategy consists in the comparative examination of both narratives as well as the empirical bases that sustain them. Using data from the 1981, 2002, and 2012 Cuban Censuses for the first time, as well as various non-census evidentiary sources, both quantitative and qualitative, we examine how racial inequality has evolved in Cuba during the last decades. Our analyses of census data suggest that racial stratification has a limited impact on areas such as education, health care, occupation, and positions of leadership. We find, nonetheless, that an expanding and strikingly racialized private sector is fueling dramatic income inequality by skin color beyond the reach of official census data. Our analysis sheds light on how different data can convey profoundly different pictures of racial inequality in a given context. Moreover, we highlight that significant contradictions can coexist in the lived experiences of racism and racial inequality within a single country context.

The Entrenchment of Racial Stratification Through the Colour-Blind Employment Standards Enforcement Regime in Ontario

The Entrenchment of Racial Stratification Through the Colour-Blind Employment Standards Enforcement Regime in Ontario