Since its early stage one century ago, Quaternary geochronology has witnessed major progress with the development of a vast array of relative, correlation and numerical dating methods. Fluvial geomorphologists have simultaneously striven to quantitatively assess processes on very different timescales (101-106 years). Dating fluvial/alluvial landforms and/or associated material/archives rapidly turned out to be one of the main challenges accordingly. Here, a bipartite reflection is proposed on how Quaternary dating methods have allowed the production of fluvial chronologies over the last century, including at the present time. Firstly, a progressive methodological shift has been witnessed. Whilst age controls were mostly attained via relative and correlation dating until the late xxth century, numerical dating methods have increasingly taken over the prevailing role since the last two or three decades. Two explanatory causes are then proposed. The bipartite evolution of relative dating methods over the last decades is explored: whilst some methods were further developed in the fluvial context (e.g., amino-acid racemization), some others were vehemently questioned (e.g., lichenometry). The late flourishing of radiometric dating methods during the second half of the xxth century is also considered. Secondly, the current status of Quaternary geochronology is doubly questioned: (i) Is the die cast for “disused” relative dating methods? and (ii) Can radiometric dating methods solve all chronological issues related to fluvial environments? Surface exposure dating of alluvial surfaces via cosmogenic nuclides is then thoroughly discussed in this respect, focusing on some methodological issues. A rehabilitation of some methods fallen into disuse, such as weathering indicators, is then proposed to support numerical age outputs. Finally, geochronological approaches based on multiple dating tools, either by crosschecking the outputs of different methods or coupling numerical dating methods, are fostered.
Read full abstract