R0 Margin Research Articles

Impact of guideline adherence and expert center referral on the early management and outcomes of uterine sarcoma patients: A retrospective analysis from the French NETSARC network

ObjectiveUterine sarcomas are rare tumors with a poor prognosis. Their diagnosis is often incidental, following surgery. Our goal was to examine the early management strategies for uterine sarcomas, and to assess the impact of guideline adherence and expert center referral on both the management approaches and the clinical outcomes in patients with uterine sarcomas. MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed medical records from patients with uterine sarcoma referred to the Institut Curie and registered in the database of the French NETSARC network. ResultsIn total, 100 patients, with a median age of 54 years, were included in the analyses. On MRI scans (n = 36), all patients had at least two signs suggestive of malignancy, and 77.8 % had four or more signs. No preoperative biopsy was performed in 65.6 % of cases. Only 14.1 % of patients underwent initial surgery at an expert center. Surgery performed outside the network was significantly associated with morcellation (32.9 % vs. 0 %; p = 0.036), fewer negative margins (R0 margins 52.4 % vs. 100 %; p = 0.006), and poor adherence to surgical guidelines (28.3 vs. 72.7 %; p = 0.013). Multivariate analysis showed that non-adherence to surgical recommendations was not significantly associated with relapse-free survival (HR = 0.54; 95 % CI [0.21–1.38]), but was an independent predictor of poor overall survival (HR = 0.12; 95 % CI [0.03–0.52]; p = 0.005). ConclusionDespite a high frequency of suspicious clinical and radiological signs, a large proportion of women undergoing sarcoma surgery are treated outside of expert networks. We provide guidelines, integrating the clinical context and radiological signs to encourage early referral to reference centers for sarcoma.

Oncologic Safety of Close Margins in Patients With Low- to Intermediate-Grade Major Salivary Gland Carcinoma

Postoperative radiation therapy for close surgical margins in low- to intermediate-grade salivary carcinomas lacks multi-institutional supportive evidence. To evaluate the oncologic outcomes for low- and intermediate-grade salivary carcinomas with close and positive margins. The American Head and Neck Society Salivary Gland Section conducted a retrospective cohort study from 2010 to 2019 at 41 centers. Margins were classified as R0 (negative), R1 (microscopically positive), or R2 (macroscopically positive). R0 margins were subclassified into clear (>1 mm) or close (≤1 mm). Data analysis was performed from June to October 2023. Main outcomes were risk factors for local recurrence. A total of 865 patients (median [IQR] age at surgery, 56 [43-66] years; 553 female individuals [64%] and 312 male individuals [36%]) were included. Of these, 801 (93%) had parotid carcinoma and 64 (7%) had submandibular gland carcinoma, and 748 (86%) had low-grade tumors and 117 (14%) had intermediate-grade tumors, with the following surgical margins: R0 in 673 (78%), R1 in 168 (19%), and R2 in 24 (3%). Close margins were found in 395 of 499 patients with R0 margins (79%), for whom margin distances were measured. A total of 305 patients (35%) underwent postoperative radiation therapy. Of all 865 patients, 35 (4%) had local recurrence with a median (IQR) follow-up of 35.3 (13.9-59.1) months. In patients with close margins as the sole risk factor for recurrence, the local recurrence rates were similar between those who underwent postoperative radiation therapy (0 of 46) or observation (4 of 165 [2%]). Patients with clear margins (n = 104) had no recurrences. The local recurrence rate in patients with R1 or R2 margins was better in those irradiated (2 of 128 [2%]) compared to observed (13 of 64 [20%]) (hazard ratio [HR], 0.05; 95% CI, 0.01-0.24). Multivariable analysis for local recurrence found the following independent factors: age at diagnosis (HR for a 10-year increase in age, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.06-1.67), R1 vs R0 (HR, 5.21; 95% CI, 2.58-10.54), lymphovascular invasion (HR, 4.47; 95% CI, 1.43-13.99), and postoperative radiation therapy (HR, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.04-0.29). The 3-year local recurrence-free survivals for the study population were 96% vs 97% in the close margin group. In this cohort study of patients with low- and intermediate-grade major salivary gland carcinoma, postoperative radiation therapy for positive margins was associated with decreased risk of local recurrence. In isolation from other risk factors for local recurrence, select patients with close surgical margins (≤1 mm) may safely be considered for observation.

Anatomical liver resection using the ultrasound-guided compression technique in minimal access surgery.

Segmental or subsegmental anatomical resection (AR) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in minimal access liver surgery (MALS) has been technically proposed. The Glissonean approach or dye injection technique are generally adopted. The tumor-feeding portal pedicle compression technique (C-AR) is an established approach in open surgery, but its feasibility in the MALS environment has never been described. Eligible patients were prospectively enrolled to undergo laparoscopic or robotic ultrasound-guided C-AR based on HCC location and preoperative identification of a single tumor-feeding portal pedicle. Initial C-AR experience was gained with laparoscopic cases in the beginning of 2020. Following our progressive experience in laparoscopic C-AR, patients requiring AR for HCC were consecutively selected for robotic C-AR. A total of 10 patients underwent minimal access C-AR. All patients had Child-Pugh A HCC. The surgical procedures included 6 laparoscopic and 4 robotic C-AR. Median tumor size was 3.1cm (range 2-7cm). All procedures had R0 margin. Postoperative complications were nil. C-AR technique is a feasible and promising technique for patients eligible for laparoscopic and robotic AR for HCC. Further data are necessary to validate its applicability to more complex minimal access AR.

A Systematic Review and Illustrative Case Presentation of Low-Grade Myofibroblastic Sarcoma (LGMS) of the Extremities.

Low-grade myofibroblastic sarcoma (LGMS) is a rare tumor entity which occurs in the subcutaneous and deep soft tissues; it is less common in the bone with a predilection for the extremities and the head and neck region. As confirming the diagnosis is difficult and treatment strategies are not standardized, we aimed to identify patient and tumor characteristics, and to summarize treatment strategies and their clinical outcomes to guide surgeons. Included were full articles reporting patients with histology of LGMS in the extremities, excluding tumors of the trunk. All patients underwent surgery but with different extend, from marginal to wide resection. Included studies should inform about local recurrence, metastasis, or evidence of disease, depending on the surgical treatment. We conducted a structured search using MEDLINE (via PubMed), Web of Science, EMBASE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) to identify studies on low-grade myofibroblastic sarcoma of the extremities. Study designs like randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, prospective trials, retrospective studies, and case reports were included. Prospective studies and comparative studies were not available at all. Therefore, meta-analysis was not possible and statistical analysis was purely descriptive. Of the 789 studies identified from our initial search, 17 studies including 59 cases reported LGMS of the extremities with the surgical treatment and clinical outcome and were therefore analyzed. In addition, we present the rare case and surgical management of a 28-year-old male patient with residual LGMS of the thumb after an initial incomplete resection. The current literature suggests that a wide excision with R0 margins should be considered the standard treatment for LGMS. In cases where surgery leads to significant functional impairment, individual options like free tissue transfer from a donor site have to be considered. Therefore, we also present an illustrative case. For all selected case series and case reports, a high risk of confounding, selection bias, information bias, and reporting bias must be anticipated. Nevertheless, this systematic review provides a comprehensive overview on surgical treatment and clinical outcomes in LGMS surgery of the extremities.

Association of Textbook Outcome and Hospital Volume with Long-Term Survival Following Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: What Matters More?

BackgroundBoth textbook outcome (TO) and hospital volume have been identified as quality metrics following cancer surgery. We sought to examine whether TO or hospital volume is more important relative to long-term survival following surgical resection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). MethodsPatients who underwent surgery for HCC between 2004 and 2018 were identified using the National Cancer Database. TO was defined as R0 margin resection, no extended length of stay, no 30-day readmissions, and no 90-day mortality. The impact of TO and hospital case volume on long-term survival was determined using multivariable Cox regression. ResultsAmong 24,895 patients who underwent HCC resection, 9.0% (n = 2,252), 79.5% (n = 19,787), and 11.5% (n = 2,856) of patients were operated on at low-, medium-, and high-volume hospitals, respectively. Treatment at high-volume hospitals and achievement of a post-operative TO were independently associated with improved 5-year overall survival (OS). Pairwise comparison demonstrated that patients treated at high-volume hospitals who did not achieve a TO still had a better 5-year OS versus individuals treated at low-volume hospitals who did achieve a TO (5-year OS, no TO vs. TO: low-volume hospitals, 26.5% vs. 48.6%; high volume hospitals: 62.6% vs. 74.9%, respectively; p < 0.001). Overall, resection of HCC at a high-volume hospital was independently associated with a 54% reduction in mortality. ConclusionLong-term survival following HCC resection was largely associated with hospital case volume rather than TO. The effect of TO on long-term outcomes was largely mediated by hospital case volume highlighting the importance of centralization of care for patients with HCC.

Type of neoadjuvant treatment strategy is associated with differential pathologic responses in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

BackgroundTumor fibrosis after neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) correlates with treatment response. Herein we assessed how different NAT strategies influence pathologic responses and survival. MethodsPatients with surgically resected PDAC who received NAT (1991–2020) were included. Descriptive statistics compared outcomes amongst fibrosis groups (none, minor <50 ​%, partial 51%–94 ​%, major ≥95 ​%) and NAT (chemotherapy alone, chemoradiation, or chemotherapy ​+ ​chemoradiation (total neoadjuvant therapy, TNT)). ResultsPatients with major fibrosis most often received TNT (65.8 ​%, p ​< ​0.001). Major fibrosis was associated with the greatest rate of downstaging (77.8 ​%, p ​< ​0.001), highest R0 margin rate (100 ​%, p ​< ​0.01), and lowest mean positive lymph node ratio (0.80, p ​< ​0.01). Amongst complete responders, 11/14 (78.6 ​%) received TNT. Median overall (66.3 months, p ​= ​0.003) and disease-free (54.7months, p ​= ​0.05) survival were highest with major fibrosis. ConclusionsMajor fibrosis and complete pathologic responses after NAT are most frequent with a TNT strategy and are associated with improved outcomes.

Outcomes among oropharyngeal and oral cavity cancer patients treated with postoperative volumetric modulated arctherapy.

Presently, there are few published reports on postoperative radiation therapy for oropharyngeal and oral cavity cancers treated with IMRT/VMAT technique. This study aimed to assess the oncological outcomes of this population treated with postoperative VMAT in our institution, with a focus on loco-regional patterns of failure. Between 2011 and 2019, 167 patients were included (40% of oropharyngeal cancers, and 60% of oral cavity cancers). The median age was 60 years. There was 64.2% of stage IV cancers. All patients had both T and N surgery. 34% had a R1 margin, 42% had perineural invasion. 72% had a positive neck dissection and 42% extranodal extension (ENE). All patients were treated with VMAT with simultaneous integrated boost with three dose levels: 66Gy in case of R1 margin and/or ENE, 59.4-60Gy on the tumor bed, and 54Gy on the prophylactic areas. Concomittant cisplatin was administrated concomitantly when feasible in case of R1 and/or ENE. The 1- and 2-year loco-regional control rates were 88.6% and 85.6% respectively. Higher tumor stage (T3/T4), the presence of PNI, and time from surgery >45 days were significant predictive factors of worse loco-regional control in multivariate analysis (p=0.02, p=0.04, and p=0.02). There were 17 local recurrences: 11 (64%) were considered as infield, 4 (24%) as marginal, and 2 (12%) as outfield. There were 9 regional recurrences only, 8 (89%) were considered as infield, and 1 (11%) as outfield. The 1- and 2-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 78.9% and 71.8% respectively. The 1- and 2-year overall survival (OS) rates were 88.6% and 80% respectively. Higher tumor stage (T3/T4) and the presence of ENE were the two prognostic factors significantly associated with worse DFS and OS in multivariate analysis. Our outcomes for postoperative VMAT for oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers are encouraging, with high rates of loco-regional control. However, the management of ENE still seems challenging.

Novel Postoperative Hypofractionated Accelerated Radiation Dose-Painting Approach for Soft Tissue Sarcoma

Background: Hypofractionated radiotherapy (RT) offers benefits in the treatment of soft tissue sarcomas (STS), including exploitation of the lower α/β, patient convenience, and cost. This study evaluates the acute toxicity of a hypofractionated accelerated RT dose-painting (HARD) approach for postoperative treatment of STS. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective review of 53 consecutive patients with STS who underwent resection followed by postoperative RT. Standard postoperative RT dosing for R0/R1/gross disease with sequential boost (50Gy + 14/16/20Gy in 32-35 fractions) were replaced with dose-painting, which adapts dose based on risk of disease burden, to 50.4 and 63/64.4/70 Gy in 28 fractions, respectively. The first 10 patients were re-planned with a sequential boost RT approach and dosimetric indices were compared. Time-to-event outcomes, including local control (LC), regional control (RC), distant control (DC), and overall survival (OS), were estimated with Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis. Results: Median follow up was 25.2 months. Most patients had high grade (59%) STS of the extremity (63%) who underwent resection with either R1 (40%) or close (36%) margins. Four patients experienced grade 3 acute dermatitis which resolved by the 3-month follow up visit. The 2-year LC, RC, DC, and OS were 100%, 92%, 68%, and 86%, respectively. Compared to the sequential boost plan, HARD had a significantly lower field size (total V50Gy) (p=0.002), bone V50 (p=0.031), and maximum skin dose (p=0.008). Overall treatment time was decreased by 4-7 fractions, which translated to a decrease in estimated average treatment cost of $3,056 (range: $2,51-$4,335, p<0.001). Conclusions: In addition to benefits in cost, convenience, and improved biological effect in STS, hypofractionated accelerated RT dose-painting (HARD) regimen offers a safe treatment approach with dosimetric advantages compared to conventional sequential boost, which may translate to improved long-term toxicity.

Different Oncologic Outcomes According to Margin Status (High-Grade Dysplasia vs. Carcinoma) in Patients Who Underwent Hilar Resection for Mid-Bile Duct Cancer

Margin positivity after hilar resection (HR) for bile duct cancer is commonly observed due to its longitudinal spread along the subepithelial plane; nevertheless, we cannot draw conclusions regarding the prognostic effects of margins with high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or carcinoma. We aimed to investigate the oncologic effect according to the margin status after HR, particularly between the R1 HGD and the R1 carcinoma. From 2008 to 2017, 149 patients diagnosed with mid-bile duct cancer in Samsung Medical Center, South Korea, were divided according to margin status after HR and retrospectively analyzed. Recurrence patterns were also analyzed between the groups. There were 126 patients with R0 margins, nine with R1 HGD, and 14 with R1 carcinoma. The mean age of the patients was 68.3 (±8.1); most patients were male. The mean age was higher in R1 carcinoma patients than in R1 HGD and R0 patients (p = 0.014). The R1 HGD and R1 carcinoma groups had more patients with a higher T-stage than R0 (p = 0.079). In univariate analysis, the prognostic factors affecting overall survival were age, T- and N-stage, CA19-9, and margin status. The survival rate of R0 was comparable to that of R1 HGD, but the survival rate of R0 was significantly better compared to R1 carcinoma (R0 vs. R1 HGD, p = 0.215, R0 vs. R1 carcinoma, p = 0.042, respectively). The recurrence pattern between the margin groups did not differ significantly (p = 0.604). Extended surgery should be considered for R1 carcinoma; however, in R1 HGD, extended operation may not be necessary, as it may achieve oncologic outcomes similar to R0 margins with HR.

Defining and predicting textbook outcomes for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: analysis of factors improving achievement of desired postoperative outcomes.

Definition of textbook outcome (TO), defined as a single indicator combining the most advantageous short-term outcomes, is still lacking for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC). The primary endpoint of the present study is to analyze the rate of achievement of a disease-specific TO for PHC within a high volume tertiary referral centre. Secondary endpoints are to identify predictive factors of TO-achievement and to analyze the impact of achieving TO on long-term results. Between 2010 and 2022, a total of 237 patients undergoing combined liver and biliary resection for PHC at tertiary referral centre were included. Disease-specific TO were defined as: no 90-day mortality, no postoperative complications, no readmission, no intraoperative transfusions and resection margins. A logistic regression model was developed to identify predictors associated with TO-achievement. Kaplan-Meier curves were designed to determine TO's impact on survival. TO was achieved in 60 (25.3%) patients. At multivariate logistic regression, preoperative biliary drainage [odds ratio (OR) 2.90 (1.13-3.40), P =0.026], high prognostic nutritional index [OR 7.11 (6.71-9.43), P =0.007[ and minimally invasive approach [OR 3.57 (2.31-3.62), P =0.013] were identified as independent predictors of TO. High ASA score [OR 0.38 (0.17-0.82), P =0.013] decreased the odds of TO. A significant improvement in both overall survival and disease-free survival was associated to TO fulfilment. Since the achievement of TO correlates with better disease-free and overall survival, every effort should be made to ameliorate modifiable aspects prior to surery: management within referral centres with dedicated experience in biliary tract cancer and preoperative optimization protocol may positively contribute to improve postoperative outcomes, increasing the chance to obtain TO. Moreover, the implementation of advanced minimally invasive programs plays as well.

Clinical Characteristics, Patterns of Care, and Treatment Outcomes of Radiation-Associated Sarcomas

In this study, we describe the clinical presentation, patterns of care, and treatment outcomes for radiation-associated sarcomas (RAS) patients seen at our institution. Patients with RAS treated at The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center between January 1, 2015 and January 20, 2021 were included. Demographic and clinical variables, as well as outcomes, were abstracted from chart review. Differences in outcomes were assessed based on log-rank test. A total of 38 patients with a diagnosis of RAS were identified (17 males, 21 females). The median age at radiotherapy for index malignancy was 55.3 years (range 0.2-77.5). The median latency following index radiotherapy until the RAS diagnosis was 9.1 years (range 3.7-46.3). The median age at RAS diagnosis was 68.4 years (range 27.9-85.4). The most common index malignancy associated with a subsequent RAS was breast carcinoma (n = 9 [23.7%]). The most common RAS histology was angiosarcoma (n = 10 [26.3%]). Median RAS tumor size was 5.25 cm (range 0.4-30.5). RAS grade was most commonly grade 3 (n = 25 [65.8%]). RAS locations included abdominopelvic (n = 15 [39.5%]); head & neck (n = 10 [26.3%]); and thorax (n = 10 [26.3%]). Genomic profiling identified mutations in TP53 (n = 12 [31.6%]); MYC (n = 6 [15.8%]); and CDK2A/4 (n = 5 [13.2%]). Median tumor mutation burden (TMB) was 2.6 mutations/megabase (range 0.5-6.3). Among the 33 patients with non-metastatic RAS at presentation, 78.8% (n = 26) underwent oncologic resection. Margins were R0 in 69.2% (n = 18), R1 in 19.2% (n = 5), and R2 in 11.5% (n = 3). 54.5% (n = 18) received systemic therapy and 24.2% (n = 8) received radiotherapy as part of curative-intent treatment (median dose 50.4 Gy [range 45-57.5]). For the entire cohort, median PFS was 9.0 months and median OS was 11.1 months. Among patients who presented with non-metastatic RAS, the median LRFS was 9.5 months (range 2.0-34.7); median PFS was 9.0 months (range 2.0-34.7); and median OS was 10.6 months (range 0.6-31.6). Amongst patients with metastatic RAS at presentation, median PFS was 7.4 months (range 1.4-15.8) and median OS was 13.1 months (range 6.0-14.9). Patients who presented with non-metastatic vs metastatic RAS had a significantly longer PFS (p = 0.025) and OS (p = 0.033). Amongst non-metastatic RAS, an R0 resection was associated with significantly improved mean OS (75.3 months [95% CI 54.9-95.8]) in comparison to R1 (15.2 months [95% CI 5.3-25.1]) and R2 margins (19.7 months [95% CI 10.7-28.7]), p = 0.016. Among patients managed with curative intent, there was no significant association between receipt of either systemic therapy or radiotherapy and duration of LC, PFS, or OS. Outcomes for RAS are strikingly poor. Patients with non-metastatic RAS had a significantly longer PFS and OS compared to patients who presented with metastatic RAS. As part of a curative-intent treatment, R0 surgical margins, but not receipt of systemic therapy or radiotherapy, were associated with improved OS in our cohort.

Assessment of the level III of Inoue by preoperative endoscopic ultrasound and elastography: a novel approach to predict a periarterial divestment technique in borderline resectable (BR) or locally advanced (LA) pancreatic adenocarcinoma—How I do it

BackgroundPeriarterial divestment is a surgical technique to approach borderline resectable (BR) or locally advanced (LA) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) with arterial involvement. There are no reports in the literature regarding the role of endoscopic ultrasound and elastography (EUS-EG) in exploring the integrity of Inoue’s level III and its correlation with the periarterial divestment technique feasibility. Our research is aimed at exploring the role of EUS-EG in this scenario.MethodsWe describe our approach to Inoue’s level II by EUS-EG in patients with BR and LA pancreatic cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.ResultsBetween June 2019 and December 2020, four patients out of 25 were eligible to perform a preoperative EUS-EG. In all cases, Inoue’s level III integrity was corroborated by EUS-EG and confirmed posteriorly in the surgical scenario where a periarterial divestment technique was feasible. Vein resections were necessary in all cases, with no need for arterial resection. An R0 (> 1 mm) margin was achieved in all patients, and the histopathological assessment showed the presence of neurovascular tissue at the peripheral arterial margin.ConclusionPreoperatively, EUS-EG is a novel approach to explore the integrity of Inoue’s level III and could be helpful to preclude a periarterial divestment technique in borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma with arterial involvement.

Variations in the definition and perceived importance of positive resection margins in patients with colorectal cancer – an EYSAC international survey

IntroductionMicroscopically positive resection margins (R1) are associated with poorer outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer. However, different definitions of R1 margins exist. It is unclear to what extent the definitions used in everyday clinical practice differ within and between nations. This study sought to investigate variations in the definition of R1 margins in colorectal cancer and the importance of margin status in clinical decision-making. Materials and methodsA 14-point survey was developed by members of The European Society of Surgical Oncology (ESSO) Youngs Surgeons and Alumni Club (EYSAC) Research Academy targeting all members of the multidisciplinary team (MDT) treating patients with colorectal cancer. The survey was distributed on social media, in ESSO's monthly newsletter and via national societies. ResultsIn total, 137 responses were received. Most respondents were from Europe (89.7%), with the majority from Denmark (56.9%). Less than 2/3 of respondents defined R1 margins as the presence of viable cancer cells ≤1 mm of the margin. Only 60% reported that subdivisions of R1 margins (primary tumour vs tumour deposit vs metastatic lymph node) are routinely available. More than 20% of respondents reported that pathology reports are not routinely reviewed at MDT meetings. Less than half of respondents considered margin status in decision-making for type and duration of adjuvant chemotherapy in Stage III colon cancer. ConclusionThe definitions and perceived clinical importance of microscopically positive margins in patients with colorectal cancer appear to vary. Adoption of an international dataset for pathology reporting may help to standardise current practices.

Redo Pelvic Surgery and Combined Metastectomy for Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer with Known Oligometastatic Disease: A Multicentre Review.

Historically, surgical resection for patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) had been reserved for those without metastatic disease. 'Selective' patients with limited oligometastatic disease (OMD) (involving the liver and/or lung) are now increasingly being considered for resection, with favourable five-year survival rates. A retrospective analysis of consecutive patients undergoing multi-visceral pelvic resection of LRRC with their oligometastatic disease between 1 January 2015 and 31 August 2021 across four centres worldwide was performed. The data collected included disease characteristics, neoadjuvant therapy details, perioperative and oncological outcomes. Fourteen participants with a mean age of 59 years were included. There was a female preponderance (n = 9). Nine patients had liver metastases, four had lung metastases and one had both lung and liver disease. The mean number of metastatic tumours was 1.5 +/- 0.85. R0 margins were obtained in 71.4% (n = 10) and 100% (n = 14) of pelvic exenteration and oligometastatic disease surgeries, respectively. Mean lymph node yield was 11.6 +/- 6.9 nodes, with positive nodes being found in 28.6% (n = 4) of cases. A single major morbidity was reported, with no perioperative deaths. At follow-up, the median disease-free survival and overall survival were 12.3 months (IQR 4.5-17.5 months) and 25.9 months (IQR 6.2-39.7 months), respectively. Performing radical multi-visceral surgery for LRRC and distant oligometastatic disease appears to be feasible in appropriately selected patients that underwent good perioperative counselling.

Arterial Resection for Pancreatic Cancer: Feasibility and Current Standing in a High-Volume Center.

Arterial resection (AR) during pancreatectomy for curative R0 resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains a controversial procedure with high morbidity. To investigate the feasibility and oncological outcomes of pancreatectomy combined with AR at a high-volume center for pancreatic surgery. We retrospectively analyzed our experience in PDAC patients, who underwent pancreatic resection with AR and/or venous resection (VR) between 2007 and 2021. In total 259 PDAC patients with borderline resectable (n = 138) or locally advanced (n = 121) PDAC underwent vascular resection during tumor resection. From these, 23 patients had AR (n = 4 due to intraoperative injury, n = 19 due to suspected arterial infiltration). However, 12 out of 23 patients (52.2%) underwent simultaneous VR including 1 case with intraoperative arterial injury. In comparison, 11 patients (47.8%) underwent AR only including 3 intraoperative arterial injury patients. Although the operation time and bleeding rate of patients with AR were respectively longer and higher than in VR, no significant difference was detected in postoperative complications between VR and AR (P = 0.11). The final histopathological findings of PDAC patients were similar, including M stage, regional lymph node metastases, and R0 margin resection. The mortality of the entire cohort was 6.2% (16/259), with a tendency to increase mortality in the AR cohort, yet without statistical significance (VR: 5% vs AR: 21.1%; P = 0.05). Although 19 (82.6%) patients had PDAC in the final histopathology, only 6 were confirmed to have infiltrated arteria. The microscopic distribution of PDAC in these infiltrated arterial walls on hematoxylin-eosin staining was classified into 3 patterns. Strikingly, the perivascular nerves frequently exhibited perineural invasion. AR can be performed in high-volume centers for pancreatic surgery with an acceptable morbidity, which is comparable to that of VR. However, the likelihood of arterial infiltration seems to be rather overestimated, and as such, AR might be avoidable or replaced by less invasive techniques such as divestment during PDAC surgery.

569 Resection of Massive Pelvic Chondrosarcoma Using Custom Made 3D Printed Jig: A Case Report

Abstract Background The pelvis is a complex structure associated with major neurovascular structures and so pelvic surgery can be challenging. In the field of skeletal tumours, the surgeon's main aim is to achieve adequate margins, which modern 3D printed technology can assist with. Method A 43-year-old man was found to have a 20(CC) x 13(AO) x 9.3(TR) cm chondrasarcoma at the inner aspect of the right iliac bone. The patient was consented for right sided type 1 hemipelvectomy and tumour resection using customised 3D Printed Jig. A 64-slice spiral CT pelvis was transferred to an image processing software (Materialise Mimics 21.0 and Materialise 3 Matic 13.0) to generate a 3D model. The Jig was printed by the FDM machine in ABS material and sterilised. Incision was made through standard ilioinguinal approach and tumour was visualised. Soft tissue was dissected over the posterior aspect of the Ilium for the placement of the jig and then fixed with k wire, following which osteotomy was done. Results Postoperatively the patient had no complications. At final follow up of 4 years, the patient was independently ambulant. Post op x-ray showed no signs of tumour recurrence at the operated site. Conclusions This case highlights the importance of preoperative planning and the use of modern technology in surgical resection. Customised 3D printed jigs help surgeons achieve good resections with R0 margins.

Three-dimensional visualization and evaluation of hilar cholangiocarcinoma resectability and proposal of a new classification

BackgroundAs digital medicine has exerted profound influences upon diagnosis and treatment of hepatobiliary diseases, our study aims to investigate the accuracy of three-dimensional visualization and evaluation (3DVE) system in assessing the resectability of hilar cholangiocarcinoma (hCCA), and explores its potential clinical value.Materials and methodsThe discovery cohort, containing 111 patients from April 2013 to December 2019, was retrospectively included to determine resectability according to revised criteria for unresectability of hCCA. 3D visualization models were reconstructed to evaluate resectability parameters including biliary infiltration, vascular involvement, hepatic atrophy and metastasis. Evaluation accuracy were compared between contrast-enhanced CT and 3DVE. Logistic analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors of R0 resection. A new comprehensive 3DVE classification of hCCA based on factors influencing resectability was proposed to investigate its role in predicting R0 resection and prognosis. The main outcomes were also analyzed in cohort validation, including 34 patients from January 2020 to August 2022.Results3DVE showed an accuracy rate of 91% (95%CI 83.6–95.4%) in preoperatively evaluating hCCA resectability, significantly higher than 81% (95%CI 72.8–87.7%) of that of CT (p = 0.03). By multivariable analysis, hepatic artery involvement in 3DVE was identified an independent risk factor for R1 or R2 resection (OR = 3.5, 95%CI 1.4,8.8, P < 0.01). New 3DVE hCCA classification was valuable in predicting patients’ R0 resection rate (p < 0.001) and prognosis (p < 0.0001). The main outcomes were internally validated.Conclusions3DVE exhibited a better efficacy in evaluating hCCA resectability, compared with contrast-enhanced CT. Preoperative 3DVE demonstrated hepatic artery involvement was an independent risk factor for the absence of R0 margin. 3DVE classification of hCCA was valuable in clinical practice.

Radial and longitudinal margins in surgery of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: When R1 definition is associated with different prognosis

BackgroundInfiltrated margins of resection (R1) and lymph node invasion are dominant negative predictors of survival in patients with a resectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Less clear is whether survival predictors stratify differently between R0 (tumor-free margins) and R1 patients and whether the prognosis of the latter patients is influenced by the pattern of neoplastic infiltration (ie, radial versus longitudinal infiltration). We retrospectively evaluated a series of reported resected perihilar cholangiocarcinoma to obtain insights on the predictive power of these histologic features. MethodsThe study includes 264 patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma treated between 2004 and 2019 in our center and followed up for >18 months. There were 176 patients with R0 (66.6%) and 88 patients with R1 (33.3%), 31 with radial infiltration only, 30 with longitudinal infiltration only, and 27 with both infiltration patterns. In all patients, the criteria for resection was the absence of metastatic involvement (ie, distant organ metastases, liver metastases, and lymph node metastases beyond the hepatoduodenal ligament). Histopathologic specimens of the resected tumors were centrally reviewed by a pathologist unaware of the clinical outcomes. ResultsThree- and 5-year long-term survival were significantly better in R0 (respectively) compared to R1 patients (55% and 42% vs 42% and 18%, respectively, P < .05). In R1 patients with radial infiltration only and those with radial + longitudinal infiltration, both disease-free and overall survival were worse than those with longitudinal infiltration only (median disease-free survival of 18 and 23 months, respectively, P < .05, median overall survival of 33 and 39 months, respectively, P < .05). At multivariable analysis, nodal status, side of hepatectomy, grading, and presence of radial margin infiltration were associated with long-term outcome. ConclusionRadial infiltration of resection margins enhances the negative prognostic value of R1 margins in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma patients and should specifically be accounted for in the prediction of the outcome of adjuvant therapy.

R1 pancreatic cancer patients benefit from chemoradiation when initiation of adjuvant therapy is delayed

BackgroundAdjuvant chemotherapy (AC) following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for pancreas cancer (PDAC) has been demonstrated to improve survival. However, the optimal adjuvant treatment (AT) regimen for R1-margin patients remains unclear. This retrospective study investigates the impact of AC vs. adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (ACRT) on survival (OS). Material and methodsThe NCDB was queried for patients with PDAC who underwent PD between 2010 and 2018. Patients were divided into, (A) AC<60 days, (B) ACRT<60 days, (C) AC≥60 days, and (D) ACRT≥60 days. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses and Cox multivariable regression analyses were performed. ResultsAmong 13 740 patients, median OS was 23.7 months. For R1 patients, median OS for timely AC and ACRT, and delayed AC and ACRT was 19.91, 19.19, 15.24, 18.96 months, respectively. While time of AC initiation was an insignificant factor for R0 patients (p = 0.263, CI 0.957–1.173), a survival benefit was found for R1 patients who received AC<60 vs. ≥60 days (p = 0.041, CI 1.002–1.42). Among R1 patients, administration of delayed ACRT achieves the same survival benefit of timely AC initiation (p = 0.074, CI 0.703–1.077). ConclusionThe study suggests value in ACRT for patients with R1 margins when delay of AT≥60 days cannot be avoided. Hence, ACRT may mitigate the negative impact of delayed AT initiation for R1-patients.

Securing R0 margin through extended surgical approach

Securing R0 margin through extended surgical approach