Quiescent-interval Single-shot MR Angiography Research Articles

Non-contrast-enhanced MR-angiography (MRA) of lower extremity peripheral arterial disease at 3 tesla: Examination time and diagnostic performance of 2D quiescent-interval single-shot MRA vs. 3D fast spin-Echo MRA

PurposeNon-contrast enhanced MRA is a promising diagnostic alternative to contrast-enhanced (CE-) MRA or CT in patients with lower extremity peripheral arterial disease (PAD) but potentially associated with prolonged examination times and inferior diagnostic performance. We aimed to compare examination times and diagnostic performance of non-contrast enhanced quiescent-interval slice-selective (QISS)-MRA and fast-spin-echo (FSE)-MRA at 3.0 T. Materials and methodsForty-five patients with PAD were recruited for this IRB approved prospective study. Subjects underwent lower extremity MRA with 1) QISS-MRA, 2) FSE-MRA, and 3) CE-MRA (continuous table movement MRA and time-resolved MRA of the calf), which served as the standard of reference. Scan times for each examination step and total examination times for each of the three techniques was determined. Image quality and degree of stenosis were rated by two readers on a 5-point Likert scale. Sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy for relevant (>50%) stenosis were calculated. ResultsMedian total examination time was 27:02 min for QISS-MRA (IQR, 25:13–31:01 min), 28:37 min for FSE-MRA (IQR, 25:51–33:12 min), and 31:22 min for CE-MRA (IQR, 26:41–33:23 min). Acquisition time for QISS-MRA was significantly longer compared to FSE-MRA and CE-MRA (p ≤ 0.0001), while time for localizers, scouts and planning of the MRA sequence was significantly shorter for QISS-MRA compared to FSE-MRA and CE-MRA (p ≤ 0.0001). QISS-MRA had significantly better image quality compared to FSE-MRA with less segments classified as non-diagnostic (Reader 1: 3% vs. 35%; Reader 2: 3% vs. 50%, p ≤ 0.0001). Overall, QISS-MRA showed significantly better diagnostic performance than FSE-MRA (sensitivity, 85% vs. 54%; specificity, 90% vs. 47%, diagnostic accuracy, 89% vs. 48%; p ≤ 0.0001). ConclusionTotal examination time of QISS-MRA and FSE-MRA was comparable with a conventional CE-MRA protocol. QISS-MRA showed significantly higher diagnostic performance than FSE-MRA.

Non-contrast MRI protocol for TAVI guidance: quiescent-interval single-shot angiography in comparison with contrast-enhanced CT

ObjectivesTo prospectively compare unenhanced quiescent-interval single-shot MR angiography (QISS-MRA) with contrast-enhanced computed tomography angiography (CTA) for contrast-free guidance in transcatheter aortic valve intervention (TAVI).MethodsTwenty-six patients (mean age 83 ± 5 years, 15 female [58%]) referred for TAVI evaluation underwent QISS-MRA for aortoiliofemoral access guidance and non-contrast three-dimensional (3D) “whole heart” MRI for prosthesis sizing on a 1.5-T system. Contrast-enhanced CTA was performed as imaging gold standard for TAVI planning. Image quality was assessed by a 4-point Likert scale; continuous MRA and CTA measurements were compared with regression and Bland-Altman analyses.ResultsQISS-MRA and CTA-based measurements of aortoiliofemoral vessel diameters correlated moderately to very strong (r = 0.572 to 0.851, all p ≤ 0.002) with good to excellent inter-observer reliability (intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.862 to 0.999, all p < 0.0001) regarding QISS assessment. Mean diameters of the infrarenal aorta and iliofemoral vessels differed significantly (bias 0.37 to 0.98 mm, p = 0.041 to < 0.0001) between the two modalities. However, inter-method decision for transfemoral access route was comparable (κ = 0.866, p < 0.0001). Aortic root parameters assessed by 3D whole heart MRI strongly correlated (r = 0.679 to 0.887, all p ≤ 0.0001) to CTA measurements.ConclusionQISS-MRA provides contrast-free access route evaluation in TAVI patients with moderate to strong correlations compared with CTA and substantial inter-observer agreement. Despite some significant differences in minimal vessel diameters, inter-method agreement for transfemoral accessibility is strong. Combination with 3D whole heart MRI facilitates unenhanced TAVI guidance.Key Points• QISS-MRA and CTA inter-method agreement for transfemoral approach is strong.• QISS-MRA is a very good alternative to CTA and MRA especially in patients with Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiativestages 4 and 5.• Combination of QISS-MRA and 3D “whole heart” MRI facilitates fully unenhanced TAVI guidance.

Quiescent-Interval Single-Shot Magnetic Resonance Angiography.

Lower extremity peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a chronic, debilitating disease with a significant global burden. A number of diagnostic imaging techniques exist, including computed tomography angiography (CTA) and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CEMRA), to aid in PAD diagnosis and subsequent treatment planning. Due to concerns of renal toxicity or nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF) for iodinated and gadolinium-based contrasts, respectively, a number of non-enhanced MRA (NEMRA) protocols are being increasingly used in PAD diagnosis. These techniques, including time of flight and phase contrast MRA, have previously demonstrated poor image quality, long acquisition times, and/or susceptibility to artifacts when compared to existing contrast-enhanced techniques. In recent years, Quiescent-Interval Single-Shot (QISS) MRA has been developed to overcome these limitations in NEMRA methods, with promising results. Here, we review the various screening and diagnostic tests currently used for PAD. The various NEMRA protocols are discussed, followed by a comprehensive review of the literature on QISS MRA to date. A particular emphasis is placed on QISS MRA feasibility studies and studies comparing the diagnostic accuracy and image quality of QISS MRA versus other diagnostic imaging techniques in PAD.

The diagnostic value of non-contrast enhanced quiescent interval single shot (QISS) magnetic resonance angiography at 3T for lower extremity peripheral arterial disease, in comparison to CT angiography

BackgroundThe high incidence of renal insufficiency in patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease raises the concern for nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF) with respect to contrast enhanced MRA. The risk of NSF is eliminated with non-contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography. The purpose of the current study is to compare image quality and diagnostic performance of non-contrast enhanced Quiescent Interval Single Shot (QISS) magnetic resonance angiography at 3 T versus CT angiography for evaluation of lower extremity Peripheral Arterial Disease (PAD).Methods32 consecutive patients (23 male, 9 female, age range 40–81 years, average age 61.97 years) with clinically suspected lower extremity PAD underwent QISS MRA and CTA. 19 of 32 patients underwent Digital Subtraction Angiography (DSA). Image quality of MRA was compared with CTA by two radiologists with 10 and 8 years’ experience according to a 4-point scale. The Kappa test was used to determine the intermodality agreement between MRA and CTA in stenosis assessment, and interobserver agreement with each method. Sensitivity and specificity of CTA and MRA in detecting hemodynamically significant stenosis (≥50 %) were compared, with DSA serving as reference standard when available.ResultsImage quality of QISS MRA was rated 3.70 ± 0.49 by reader 1, and 3.72 ± 0.47 by reader 2, significantly lower than that of CTA (3.80 ± 0.44 and 3.82 ± 0.42, P < 0.001 for both readers). Intermodality agreement between MRA and CTA was excellent for assessment of stenosis (Kappa = 0.923 ± 0.013 for reader 1, 0.930 ± 0.012 for reader 2). Interobserver agreement was 0.936 ± 0.012 for CTA and 0.935 ± 0.011 for MRA. For readers 1 and 2 respectively, the sensitivity of QISS was 94.25 and 93.26 % (versus 90.11 and 89.13 % for CTA, P > 0.05), and specificity of QISS was 96.70 and 97.75 % (versus 96.55 and 96.51 % for CTA, P > 0.05). For heavily calcified segments, sensitivity of QISS (95.83 and 95.83 %) was significantly higher than that of CTA (74.19 and 76.67 %, P < 0.05).ConclusionQISS is a reliable alternative to CTA for evaluation of lower extremity PAD, and may be suitable as a first-line screening examination in patients with contraindications to intravenous contrast administration.

Evaluating Peripheral Arterial Disease With Unenhanced Quiescent-Interval Single-Shot MR Angiography at 3 T

The objective of our study was to assess the diagnostic performance of quiescent-interval single-shot (QISS) MR angiography (MRA) at 3 T for the evaluation of chronic lower limb ischemia. For this prospective study, 25 patients referred for lower extremity angiography for suspected or known chronic peripheral arterial disease were imaged on a 3-T system using QISS MRA. Contrast-enhanced MRA of the lower extremities was acquired at 3 T for each patient at the time of the initial visit and served as the noninvasive reference standard. Two blinded reviewers separately graded the degree of arterial stenosis. The sensitivity and specificity of QISS MRA for the determination of significant (≥ 50%) stenosis were calculated against contrast-enhanced MRA. Subsequent selective digital subtraction angiography (DSA) was performed and reviewed in nine patients. QISS MRA exhibited diagnostic performance nearly equivalent to that of contrast-enhanced MRA and also showed strong correlation with findings on DSA. Segment-based analysis revealed that, for the two reviewers, QISS MRA had sensitivities of 95.9% (142 of 148 segments) and 93.5% (145 of 155 segments) and specificities of 98.5% (595 of 604 segments) and 97.0% (578 of 596 segments) on comparison with contrast-enhanced MRA. QISS MRA maintains high diagnostic performance at 3 T despite the challenges inherent to image acquisition at higher field strengths.

ECG-gated quiescent-interval single-shot MR angiography of the lower extremities: Initial experience at 3 T

To evaluate the feasibility of unenhanced electrocardiography (ECG)-gated quiescent-interval single-shot magnetic resonance angiography (QISS-MRA) of the lower extremities at 3 T. Twenty-five patients with known or suspected peripheral arterial disease underwent ECG-gated QISS-MRA and contrast-enhanced MRA (CE-MRA) at 3 T. Two independent readers performed a per-segment evaluation of the MRA datasets. Image quality was rated on a four-point scale (1 = excellent to 4 = non-diagnostic; presented as medians with interquartile range). Diagnostic performance of QISS-MRA was evaluated using CE-MRA as the reference standard. QISS-MRA and CE-MRA of all patients were considered for analysis, resulting in 807 evaluated vessel segments for each MRA technique. Readers 1 and 2 rated image quality of QISS-MRA as diagnostic in 97.3% and 97% of the vessel segments, respectively. CE-MRA was rated diagnostic in all vessel segments. Image quality of the proximal vessel segments, including the infrarenal aorta, iliac arteries, and common femoral artery, was significantly lower on QISS-MRA compared to CE-MRA [image quality score across readers: 2 (1,3) versus 1 (1,1) p < 0.001]. In the more distal vessel segments, image quality of QISS-MRA was excellent and showed no significant difference compared to CE-MRA [image quality score across readers: 1 (1,1) versus 1 (1,1) p = 0.036]. Diagnostic performance of QISS-MRA was as follows (across readers): sensitivity: 87.5% (95% CI: 80.2-92.4%); specificity: 96.1% (95% CI: 93.6-97.6%); diagnostic accuracy: 94.9% (95% CI: 92.6-96.5%). QISS-MRA of the lower extremities is feasible at 3 T and provides high image quality, especially in the distal vessel segments.

Nonenhanced ECG-gated quiescent-interval single shot MRA: Image quality and stenosis assessment at 3 tesla compared with contrast-enhanced MRA and digital subtraction angiography

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a nonenhanced electrocardiograph-gated quiescent-interval single shot MR-angiography (QISS-MRA) at 3 Tesla with contrast-enhanced MRA (CE-MRA) and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) serving as reference standard. Following institutional review board approval, 16 consecutive patients with peripheral arterial disease underwent a combined peripheral MRA protocol consisting of a large field-of-view QISS-MRA, continuous table movement MRA, and an additional time-resolved MRA of the calves. DSA correlation was available in eight patients. Image quality and degree of stenosis was assessed. Sensitivity and specificity of QISS-MRA was evaluated with CE-MRA and DSA serving as the standards of reference and compared using the Fisher exact test. With the exception of the calf station, image quality with QISS-MRA was rated statistically significantly less than that of CE-MRA (P < 0.05, P = 0.17, and P = 0.6, respectively). A greater percentage of segments were not accessible with QISS-MRA (19.5-20.1%) in comparison to CE-MRA (10.9%). Relative to DSA, sensitivity for QISS-MRA was high (100% versus 91.2% for CE-MRA, P = 0.24) in the evaluated segments; however, specificity (76.5%) was substantially less than that of CE-MRA (94.6%, P = 0.003). Overall image quality and specificity of QISS-MRA at 3T are diminished relative to CE-MRA. However, when image quality is adequate, QISS-MRA has high sensitivity and, thus, has potential use in patients with contraindications to gadolinium.

Prospective self‐gated nonenhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the peripheral arteries

Most nonenhanced MRA techniques for evaluating peripheral artery disease (PAD) require cardiac synchronization through physiological gating. Electrocardiographic gating is the most popular method for cardiac synchronization; however, it is subject to interference from switching magnetic field gradients and radiofrequency pulses. A method is described for self-gated nonenhanced MRA that does not require the use of electrocardiographic gating. Imaging was prospectively triggered by detecting the acceleration of blood flow during systole with a reference-less phase contrast navigator. The technique was implemented for nonsubtractive nonenhanced MRA using quiescent-interval single-shot MRA. The lower extremity peripheral arteries of eight healthy subjects were imaged using electrocardiographic-, pulse-, and self-gated quiescent-interval single-shot. Self-gated quiescent-interval single-shot triggered with 99% accuracy. There were no significant differences in relative contrast, contrast-to-noise ratio, or image quality between self-gated and electrocardiographic-gated quiescent-interval single-shot MRA (P > 0.05). Image quality with pulse gating was inferior.

Nonenhanced ECG-gated quiescent-interval single-shot MRA (QISS-MRA) of the lower extremities: Comparison with contrast-enhanced MRA

To evaluate electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated quiescent-interval single-shot magnetic resonance angiography (QISS-MRA) for nonenhanced assessment of peripheral artery occlusive disease (PAOD) using contrast-enhanced MRA (CE-MRA) as the reference standard. Twenty-seven patients (mean age 66.6±10.8 years) with PAOD were included in the study. QISS-MRA and CE-MRA of the lower extremity were performed using a 1.5 T MR scanner. In each patient, subjective image quality and the degree of stenosis were evaluated on a four-point scale for 15 predefined arterial segments. Twenty-five of the 27 patients were considered for analysis. Subjective image quality of QISS-MRA was significantly lower for the distal aorta, pelvic arteries, and femoral arteries as compared to CE-MRA (p<0.01), while no significant difference was found for other vascular segments. The degree of stenosis was overestimated with QISS-MRA in 23 of 365 (6.3%) segments and underestimated in two of 365 (0.5%) segments. As compared to CE-MRA, QISS-MRA had a high sensitivity (98.6%), specificity (96%) as well as positive and negative predictive value (88.7 and 99.6%, respectively) for the detection of significant stenosis (≥50%). ECG-gated QISS-MRA is a promising imaging technique for reliable assessment of PAOD without the use of contrast material.

Evaluation of Peripheral Arterial Disease with Nonenhanced Quiescent-Interval Single-Shot MR Angiography.

Quiescent-interval single-shot nonenhanced MR angiography offers an alternative to currently used imaging tests for symptomatic chronic lower limb ischemia, for which the administration of iodinated or gadolinium-based contrast agents is contraindicated.

Ankle-brachial index (ABI) and quiescent-interval single shot (QISS) MRA in peripheral arterial disease (PAD): comparison of diagnostic accuracy and need for additional imaging procedures

Background PAD is a major cause of morbidity and accurate diagnosis is essential for optimal patient management. ABI measurement is the initial diagnostic test of choice however, accuracy is sometimes limited, e.g. in diabetic patients and with vessel calcification. Additional imaging with CTA, MRA, or DSA is often required prior to revascularization. QISS MRA is a rapid, operator-independent non-contrast MRA technique which has been reported to evaluate PAD with accuracy comparable to that of CE-MRA (1). We compared ABI and QISS MRA with respect to the following: (a) what is the accuracy for hemodynamically significant stenoses; (b) was the detected abnormality located in the symptomatic limb; (c) after imaging with QISS MRA is there an expectation for additional imaging evaluation prior to intervention?

Quiescent-interval single-shot unenhanced magnetic resonance angiography of peripheral vascular disease: Technical considerations and clinical feasibility

We performed technical optimization followed by a pilot clinical study of quiescent-interval single-shot MR angiography for peripheral vascular disease. Quiescent-interval single-shot MR angiography acquires data using a modified electrocardiographic (ECG)-triggered, fat suppressed, two-dimensional, balanced steady-state, free precession pulse sequence incorporating slice-selective saturation and a quiescent interval for maximal enhancement of inflowing blood. Following optimization at 1.5 T, a pilot study was performed in patients with peripheral vascular disease, using contrast-enhanced MR angiography as the reference standard. The optimized sequence used a quiescent interval of 228 ms, alpha/2 catalyzation of the steady-state magnetization, and center-to-out partial Fourier acquisition with parallel acceleration factor of 2. Spatial resolution was 2-3mm along the slice direction and 0.7-1mm in-plane before interpolation. Excluding stented arterial segments, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of quiescent-interval single-shot MR angiography for arterial narrowing greater than 50% or occlusion were 92.2%, 94.9%, 83.9%, and 97.7%, respectively. Quiescent-interval single-shot MR angiography provided robust depiction of normal peripheral arterial anatomy and peripheral vascular disease in less than 10 min, without the need to tailor the technique for individual patients. Moreover, the technique provides consistent image quality in the pelvic region despite the presence of respiratory and bowel motion.