Quick Score Research Articles

Urinary biomarkers for diagnosing acute kidney injury in sepsis in the emergency department.

Development of acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients with sepsis is associated with increased mortality, highlighting the importance of early detection and management. However, baseline creatinine or urine output measurements are required for AKI diagnosis, which can be challenging in emergency departments (EDs). We aimed to evaluate the association between urinary biomarkers and the AKI diagnosis or 30-day survival status in patients with sepsis in the ED. This prospective observational study enrolled patients from a single ED. We enrolled adult patients presenting to the ED with symptoms suggestive of infection and an initial quick sequential organ failure assessment score ≥2. Initial urine samples were collected, and urinary biomarkers (dickkopf-3, soluble triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-1, kidney injury molecule-1, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-2 (TIMP-2), and insulin-like growth factor binding protein-7 (IGFBP-7), and TIMP-2×IGFBP-7) were analyzed using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to evaluate biomarker performance. Of 84 patients, 63 (75.0%) were diagnosed with AKI and 16 (19.0%) died within 30 days. None of the urinary biomarkers demonstrated significant differences between the survivors and non-survivors. NGAL (p=0.014) and TIMP-2×IGFBP-7 (p=0.027) levels were different between the AKI and non-AKI groups. The multivariable logistic regression model suggested a higher area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for models, including TIMP-2×IGFBP-7 (from 0.853 to 0.889, p=0.018). None of the urinary biomarkers in the initial urine sample demonstrated an independent association with AKI diagnosis or 30-day survival status in patients with sepsis presenting to the ED. Further studies with larger population are necessary to confirm its clinical utility and explore its role.

Electronic Sepsis Screening Among Patients Admitted to Hospital Wards

Sepsis screening is recommended among hospitalized patients but is supported by limited evidence of effectiveness. To evaluate the effect of electronic sepsis screening, compared with no screening, on mortality among hospitalized ward patients. In a stepped-wedge, cluster randomized trial at 5 hospitals in Saudi Arabia, 45 wards (clusters) were randomized into 9 sequences, 5 wards each, to have sepsis screening implemented at 2-month periods. The study was conducted between October 1, 2019, and July 31, 2021, with follow-up through October 29, 2021. An electronic alert, based on the quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, was implemented in the electronic medical record in a silent mode that was activated to a revealed mode for sepsis screening. The primary outcome was 90-day in-hospital mortality. There were 11 secondary outcomes, including code blue activation, vasopressor therapy, incident kidney replacement therapy, multidrug-resistant organisms, and Clostridioides difficile. Among 60 055 patients, 29 442 were in the screening group and 30 613 in the no screening group. They had a median age of 59 years (IQR, 39-68), and 30 596 were male (51.0%). Alerts occurred in 4299 of 29 442 patients (14.6%) in the screening group and 5394 of 30 613 (17.6%) in the no screening group. Within 12 hours of the alert, patients in the screening group were more likely to have serum lactate tested (adjusted relative risk [aRR], 1.30; 95% CI, 1.16-1.45) and intravenous fluid ordered (aRR, 2.17; 95% CI, 1.92-2.46) compared with those in the no screening group. In the primary outcome analysis, electronic screening resulted in lower 90-day in-hospital mortality (aRR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.77-0.93; P < .001). Screening reduced vasopressor therapy and multidrug-resistant organisms but increased code blue activation, incident kidney replacement therapy, and C difficile. Among hospitalized ward patients, electronic sepsis screening compared with no screening resulted in significantly lower in-hospital 90-day mortality. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04078594.

Outcomes of adults hospitalized with COVID-19 at the University Teaching Hospital of Butare in Rwanda and validation of the Universal Vital Assessment (UVA) mortality risk score.

There are few data regarding clinical outcomes from COVD-19 from low-income countries (LICs) including Rwanda. Accordingly, we aimed to determine 1) outcomes of patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19 in Rwanda, and 2) the ability of the Universal Vital Assessment (UVA) score to predict mortality in patients with COVID-19 compared to sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) and quick (qSOFA) scores. We conducted a retrospective study of patients aged ≥18 years hospitalized with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 at the University Teaching Hospital of Butare (CHUB), Rwanda, April 2021-January 2022. For each participant, we calculated UVA, SOFA, and qSOFA risk scores and determined their area under the receive operating characteristic curve (AUC). We used logistic regression to determine predictors of mortality. Of the 150 patients included, 83 (55%) were female and the median (IQR) age was 61 (43-73) years. The median (IQR) length of hospital stay was 6 (3-10) days. Respiratory failure occurred in 69 (46%) including 34 (23%) who had ARDS. The case fatality rate was 44%. Factors independently associated with mortality included acute kidney injury (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 7.99, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.47-43.22, p = 0.016), severe COVID-19 (aOR 3.42, 95% CI 1.06-11.01, p = 0.039), and a UVA score >4 (aOR 7.15, 95% CI 1.56-32.79, p = 0.011). The AUCs for UVA, qSOFA, and SOFA scores were 0.86 (95% CI 0.79-0.92), 0.81 (95% CI 0.74-0.88), and 0.84 (95% CI 0.78-0.91), respectively, which were not statistically significantly different from each other. At a UVA score cut-off of 4, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for mortality were 0.58, 0.93, 0.86, and 0.74, respectively. Patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in CHUB had high mortality, which was accurately predicted by the UVA score. Calculation of the UVA score in patients with COVID-19 in LICs may assist clinicians with triage and other management decisions.

Characteristics of a revised quick sequential organ failure assessment score (RqSOFA) to predict in-hospital mortality of patients visiting the emergency department via ambulance: an observational cohort study.

The National Early Warning Score (NEWS), Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA), and modified qSOFA (MqSOFA) are scoring systems that rely on vital signs. However, NEWS is time-consuming, qSOFA has low sensitivity, and MqSOFA includes a difficult calculation. To address these issues, we developed the Revised qSOFA score (RqSOFA) that consists of percutaneous oxygen saturation, oxygen usage, Simple Shock Index, and the parameters of qSOFA. The predictability of RqSOFA was examined for in-hospital mortality among patients who were transported by ambulance. This observational cohort study included all patients transported via ambulance to an Emergency Department between 2019 and 2021. Patients who had prehospital cardiopulmonary arrest, were pregnant, were younger than 15years old, arrived from another hospital, and had missing data were excluded. The Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUROC) of RqSOFA, as well as its sensitivity and specificity at the optimal cut-off point, were determined and compared to those of qSOFA, NEWS and MqSOFA. Among 1849 included patients, 53 died in the hospital. The AUROC for RqSOFA was 0.867 and the optimal cut-off point was 2. The sensitivity and specificity were 0.849 and 0.802, respectively. The AUROC of RqSOFA was larger than qSOFA but had no significance with NEWS and MqSOFA. RqSOFA exhibited the same sensitivity and better specificity compared to NEWS. There were no differences in sensitivity and specificity between RqSOFA and MqSOFA. In conclusion, RqSOFA exhibited superior predictability for in-hospital mortality to qSOFA and NEWS, while offering similar predictability to MqSOFA despite relying only on simple measurements.

Fournier's gangrene mortality: peri-umbilical cutaneous involvement as a crucial clinical indicator

BackgroundFournier's gangrene (FG) is a severe urological emergency characterized by high mortality and requiring intensive management. Our objective was to ascertain the clinical and biological determinants of mortality in cases of FG, assessed one month following the initial surgical intervention.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective study of male patients treated surgically for urologically-originating Fournier's gangrene, diagnosed through physical examination, from January 2002 to December 2022. We analyzed clinical predictors by dividing affected skin into nine zones: scrotal, penile, perineal, hypogastric, right inguinal, left inguinal, right flank, left flank, and peri-umbilical regions.ResultsOur study included 118 patients, average age 58.97 years (± 13.84). Among them, 60.2% had diabetes, 27.1% were hypertensive, and 51.7% had a performance status of ≥ 2. At admission, 70% had a quick SOFA score of 0. The one-month postoperative mortality rate was 12.7%. In univariate analysis, all predefined cutaneous areas were significant except the scrotal region, with higher odds ratios for upper abdominal involvement. Independent predictive factors for one-month postoperative mortality were a heart rate ≥ 89 bpm (p = 0.001; OR = 6.96; 95% CI 2.16–22.40), systolic blood pressure ≤ 115 mmHg (p = 0.009; OR = 4.24; 95% CI 1.34–13.41), and peri-umbilical involvement (p < 0.001; OR = 216.67; 95% CI 33.06–1420.20). Peri-umbilical involvement had a notably stronger predictive effect on one-month postoperative mortality.ConclusionFournier's gangrene prognosis worsens with more abdominal skin involvement. Key factors for one-month postoperative mortality are heart rate ≥ 89 bpm, systolic blood pressure ≤ 115 mmHg, and peri-umbilical involvement, which is notably linked to higher mortality.

How many is enough? Measuring the number of FAST exams needed by emergency medicine trainees to reach competence

BackgroundFor patients with blunt abdominal trauma, the Focused Assessment with Sonography in Trauma (FAST) exam is the initial imaging modality employed to diagnose and risk stratify. A positive FAST exam in this patient population denotes intraperitoneal hemorrhage. In a hemodynamically unstable patient, it necessitates rapid surgical intervention. Ultrasound is highly dependent on the operator’s ability to obtain quality images for interpretation. Failure to obtain adequate images prevents accurate interpretation and reduce its diagnostic accuracy. Previous studies evaluating whether the FAST exam can be improved solely by experience had conflicting results. None of those studies used an objective method to evaluate the FAST exam’s quality. Our study aimed to objectively determine the number of FAST exams required by an emergency medicine (EM) resident to reach sufficient quality for independent scanning.Methods59 first-year EM residents from a single site were included in this study. All FAST exams that were saved in the Qpath archival system by the 59 EM residents, whether the exam was performed for educational or clinical purposes, were reviewed, and scored using a Task-Specific Checklist (TSC) score. This score is an objective way to assess the proficiency and quality of the FAST scan. The TSC was based on whether the imaging of 24 specific anatomic landmarks, split into four anatomic regions, was completed successfully or not. The AEMUS (Advanced EM Ultrasonography) faculty provided feedback to trainees wither electronically via Qpath or at the bedside. According to the quality of ultrasound imaging and competence (QUICK Score), if the average TSC score for the first 10 exams was 18 or higher, the resident was considered an expert. However, if the resident failed to achieve that score, we skipped the first exam performed by the resident and the average score for the second through eleventh exams was then calculated. If the resident did not achieve the desired result, the first and second exams were skipped and the average score for the remaining 10 exams was determined. This sequence was repeated until the resident achieved an average score of 18 or higher on their TSC score.ResultsIn total, 663 FAST scans performed by EM residents were scored. The average number of FAST exams needed for independent scanning is 11.23 (95% CI, 10.6-11.85). 66.1% of enrolled residents achieved an average score of 18 or higher in their first 10 FAST exams, and 33.8% of residents required more than 10 scans. The average scores for the right upper quadrant (RUQ), left upper quadrant (LUQ), pelvic, and subxiphoid views were 5 (95% CI, 4.88–5.1), 4.7 (95% CI, 4.59–4.8), 5.1 (95% CI, 4.96–5.24), and 3.7 (95% CI 3.6–3.8) respectively.ConclusionThis study demonstrated that when constructive feedback on each FAST exam was given, the average first-year emergency medicine resident achieves competency in performing FAST exams independently after completing 10–12 (average of 11.23) FAST exams. Further research is required to validate the findings.

Scoring model for the diagnosis of colorectal perforation and its differentiation from gastroduodenal perforation.

Distinguishing colorectal from gastroduodenal perforations is clinically important and challenging. We aimed to establish a scoring model based on objective findings (excluding computed tomography findings) for the diagnosis of colorectal perforation and its differentiation from gastroduodenal perforation. Patients diagnosed with colorectal or gastroduodenal perforations between January 2014 and December 2021 were retrospectively studied. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify independent variables, and a scoring model was developed based on these variables. Among 131 eligible patients, 64 (48.9%) were in the colorectal group and 67 (51.1%) were in the gastroduodenal group. White blood cell count, C-reactive protein, and quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score were identified as independent clinical variables associated with the diagnosis of colorectal perforation, which differentiated colorectal perforation from gastroduodenal perforation, and were used to develop a new scoring model. The scores ranged from 0 to 5, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.846. The probabilities of colorectal perforation with scores of 0, 1.5, 2, 3, 3.5, and 5 were 3.2, 20, 55.6, 81.8, 73.9, and 82.4%, respectively. The new scoring model may help in treatment selection and perioperative management of patients with gastrointestinal perforation.

Bacterial profile of wound site infections and evaluation of risk factors for sepsis among road traffic accident patients from Apex Trauma Centre, Northern India.

Background. Among the most significant yet often ignored health issues worldwide are trauma and accidental injuries. India accounts for 11% of global deaths in road accidents, the highest in the world, according to the World Bank report. There are limited data about the bacterial contamination of road traffic accident (RTA) wounds and their antibiotic susceptibility patterns. Materials and Methods. This prospective study was conducted in a tertiary care centre in northern India from January 2023 to January 2024. Wound deep swabs or aspirates were collected from RTA patients with traumatic injuries at different time intervals. Gram stain and culture were performed, and positive aerobic culture was subjected to antibiotic susceptibility testing. Organism identification was done using MALDI-TOF MS and routine biochemical tests. Blood samples were also collected to rule out bloodstream infections during follow-up if the patient became febrile or showed symptoms of systemic infection. Sepsis was defined in those patients who had two or more scores in the systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria with a positive microbiological culture. Risk factors were evaluated for sepsis on the basis of the patient's vitals, injury characteristics, procalcitonin, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, need for mechanical ventilation and complete blood count, which were obtained from the patient's admission file. Results. A total of 189 wound samples were collected, of which 99 (52.38%) samples showed the growth of microorganisms. The aerobic isolates included 69 (69.69%) Gram-negative bacilli, of which the majority were Klebsiella pneumoniae, 28 (28.28%) Gram-positive cocci, of which the majority were Staphylococcus aureus and 2 (2.02%) anaerobic isolates. Among the Gram-negative isolates, none of the isolates were resistant to colistin. All S. aureus isolates were susceptible to vancomycin, teicoplanin and levonadifloxacin. Sepsis developed in 50 (26.45 %) patients. Significant risk factors evaluated for sepsis were a raised procalcitonin level, a low GCS score, a higher injury severity score, the need for mechanical ventilation and a raised quick sequential organ failure assessment score. Conclusion. It is essential to ascertain the profile of microorganisms isolated from RTA wounds in order to reduce antibiotic resistance and deliver efficient treatment.

Differential expression of plasma cytokines in sepsis patients and their clinical implications.

Sepsis, which is characterized by acute systemic inflammation and is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality, presents a significant challenge in health care. Some scholars have found that the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) and quick SOFA scores are not ideal for predicting severe sepsis and mortality. Microbial culture takes a long time (2-3 d) and provides no information for early diagnosis and treatment. Therefore, new diagnostic methods for sepsis need to be explored. To assess cytokine levels in the plasma of sepsis patients and identify potential biomarkers for diagnosing sepsis. Ten sepsis patients admitted to the emergency department within 24 h of onset were enrolled as the observation group, whereas ten noninfected patients served as the control group. Of the 10 noninfected patients, 9 hypertension combined with cerebral infarction, 1 patients with vertiginous syndrome. Plasma Cytokines were measured using the Bio-Plex Pro™ Human Chemokine Panel 40-plex. Differentially expressed cytokines in plasma of sepsis and nonsepsis patients were analyzed using Gene Ontology (GO) functional enrichment and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analyses. Interleukin (IL)-16, granulocyte-macrophage granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), CX3CL1, CXCL9, CXCL16, CCL25, and CCL23 plasma levels were significantly increased in sepsis patients. GO analysis revealed that these cytokines were mainly associated with cellular structures such as intermediates, nuclear plaques, adhesion plaques, lateral plasma membranes, and cell matrix junctions. These genes were involved in various molecular functions, such as cytokine activity, receptor ligand activity, and signal receptor activator activity, contributing to various biological functions, such as leukocyte chemotaxis, migration, and chemotaxis. KEGG analysis indicated involvement in cytokine cytokine receptor interactions, chemokine signaling pathways, virus-protein interactions with cytokines and cytokine receptors, and the tumor necrosis factor signaling pathway. Elevated serum levels of IL-16, GM-CSF, CX3CL1, CXCL9, CXCL16, CCL25, and CCL23 in sepsis patients suggest their potential as diagnostic biomarkers for sepsis.

Risk factors for positive follow-up blood cultures in critically ill adults with Gram-negative bacteraemia.

To evaluate the utility of follow-up blood cultures (FUBCs) for Gram-negative bloodstream infection (BSI) in ICU patients and identify risk factors for repeat positive cultures. This was a single-centre, retrospective cohort study of critically ill adults with Gram-negative BSI between 1 January 2015 and 1 January 2020. Critically ill patients with one or more blood cultures positive for a Gram-negative organism were included. Descriptive and inferential statistics were performed with an alpha of 0.05. A total of 148 critically ill patients with Gram-negative BSI were included, with 42 patients (28.4%) having one or more positive FUBCs. The majority (66.2%) were admitted to a medical ICU. The most common organisms isolated were Escherichia coli (n = 56, 37.8%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 26, 17.6%). Significant patient risk factors associated with a positive FUBC on univariate regression included: MDR organisms, immunocompromised status, fever, vasopressor use at time of FUBC, lack of source control attainment, and higher quick Pitt bacteraemia score. Multivariable penalized logistic regression indicated that lack of source control containment and less time from index to FUBC remained significantly associated with repeat positive FUBC. This is the first study to investigate the use of FUBC for Gram-negative BSI in exclusively ICU patients. Risk factors for repeat positive FUBC in this population include lack of source control and less time between index and FUBC. Prospective studies are needed to fully elucidate the role of FUBCs in critically ill patients with Gram-negative BSI.

541. THE PHOENIX-HH SCORE: A TOOL TO PREDICT ADMISSION TO THE ICU AFTER HIATAL HERNIA REPAIR

Abstract Background Minimally invasive hiatal hernia (HH) repair is usually a safe procedure with low morbidity; however, a subset of patients may require intensive care unit (ICU) admission. To date, no specific and validated tool is available to predict the risk of ICU admission after HH repair. Although multiple tools to predict the risk of admission to the ICU after major surgical procedures have been reported, most of them are complex and require laboratory parameters. We propose a novel and quick intraoperative score that is useful for assessing unexpected ICU admission and tailoring patient management during HH repair. Methods A development cohort was established using a prospectively maintained database containing demographic, clinical, and surgical information of consecutive patients who underwent HH repair between September 2016 and July 2023. Clinical expertise and multiple logistic regressions were employed to select adequate demographic or surgical predictors to create an intuitive risk score (PHOENIX-HH). Further, a specific scoring system for each included variable was designated, and the total score (a scale from 0 to 9 points) was assessed for accuracy using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC). Results The development cohort was formed by 391 patients who underwent primary HH repair (73.7% women; mean age 64.4±12.5 years; mean BMI 28.9±4.9 kg/m2). The mean AUC in the development cohort was 0.845 (95%CI: 0.756-0.934), and when defining a cut-off of ≥6 points, 12 of 15 patients who required ICU admission were identified using the proposed score (sensitivity, 80% [95%CI: 51.9-95.7%]; specificity, 80.1% [95%CI: 75.7-84%]; positive likelihood ratio, 4.0 [95%CI: 2.9-5.6]; negative predictive value, 99.0% [95%CI: 97.3-99.6%]). Conclusion The strongest predictor for unexpected ICU admission and postoperative complications following HH repair was the HH size (defined as the percentage of intrathoracic stomach); hence, the incorporation of this variable and other preoperative and intraoperative factors into a scoring system led to the development of the PHOENIX-HH score. This tool may allow early identification of patients who may require admission to the ICU after the surgery. Future validation using an external cohort is highly desirable.

Impact of Abnormal Ankle Brachial Index on Sepsis Survival: One-Year Prospective Study Results.

Lower extremity peripheral artery disease (LE-PAD) has been linked to unfavorable cardiovascular outcomes. The impact of potentially undiagnosed LE-PAD, suspected by abnormal ankle-brachial index (ABI), on the survival of sepsis patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) remains uncertain. We conducted a prospective cohort study and recruited adult patients admitted to the ICU with a primary diagnosis of sepsis (defined by a quick Sepsis-Related Organ Failure Assessment score of ≥ 2) between November 23, 2017 and July 22, 2018. ABI measurements were obtained within 24 hours of admission. The study compared the 30-day and 1-year all-cause mortality rates as well as the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) between the groups with normal and abnormal ABI values. Of the 102 sepsis patients admitted to the ICU, 38 (37%) were diagnosed with LE-PAD based on their ABI measurements. The overall 30-day mortality rate was 30.0% in patients with LE-PAD and 25.8% in those with normal ABI (p = 0.56). At 1 year, the overall mortality rate was 52.6% in the patients with abnormal ABI and 40.6% in those with normal ABI (p = 0.24). Additionally, the incidence of MACEs was significantly higher in the patients with abnormal ABI compared to those with normal ABI at 1-year follow-up (21.1% vs. 3.1%, respectively; p = 0.003). The patients with abnormal ABI had a higher incidence of MACEs within one year following hospital discharge. Future studies are needed to improve cardiovascular outcomes among sepsis survivors (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03372330).

Retrospective analysis of Acinetobacter baumannii bacteraemia risk factors, complications and mortality in a tertiary university hospital in Saudi Arabia.

Introduction. There are many multidrug-resistant isolates of the nosocomial pathogen, Acinetobacter baumannii, causing severe healthcare-acquired infections in terminally ill patients with high mortality and morbidity rates. Aim. This study aims to retrospectively analyse A. baumannii bacteraemia (ABB) cases in Saudi Arabia, where the information is sparse regarding the prevalence, risk factors, clinical disease, antibiotic regimen, antibiotic susceptibility, treatment outcomes and mortality associated with this infection. Methods. A retrospective chart review was conducted between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2022 to identify all patients aged 14 years and above with ABB. Demographic and clinical data, as well as results from laboratory analyses, were collected from patients' electronic charts. Statistical analyses were performed on the data to identify factors associated with 90-day mortality. Results. Of the 122 ABB cases, 71 (63.4%) died. The factors that were found to be associated with 90-day mortality were the Charlson Comorbidity Index, Pitt bacteraemia score, quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (P<0.001 for each), hospital ward (P<0.02), short duration of antibiotic treatment (P<0.01) and higher age (P<0.05). The most common source of infection was central line-associated bloodstream infection in 52.7%. Also associated with mortality were inappropriate antimicrobial therapy (P<0.02) and empirical use of colistin (P<0.05). In many patients, ABB was caused by carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii [(CRAB), 69.6%], and 74.4% of those patients died. Conclusion. To prevent ABB-associated mortality, an appropriate regimen and duration of treatment are necessary. Hospitals should also practice proper hygiene to prevent the spread of ABB. CRAB is a growing threat in hospitals in Saudi Arabia, especially in the critical care setting, and carries a very high risk of mortality.

The role of M1 (CD11c) and M2 (CD163) interplay in the pathogenesis of oral submucous fibrosis and its malignant transformation: An immunohistochemical analysis

ObjectivesThe M1/M2 macrophage framework is crucial in organ fibrosis and its progression to malignancy. This study investigated the possible role of M1/M2 macrophage interplay in the pathogenesis of oral submucous fibrosis (OSF) and its malignant transformation by analysing immunohistochemical expression of CD11c (M1) and CD163 (M2) markers. MethodsImmunohistochemistry was performed using primary antibodies against CD11c and CD163 on ten formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue blocks for each group: (i) Stage 1 OSF, (ii) Stage 2 OSF, (iii) Stage 3 OSF, (iv) Stage 4 OSF, (v) well-differentiated squamous cell carcinoma (WDSCC) with OSF, and (vi) WDSCC without OSF. Ten cases of healthy buccal mucosa (NOM) served as controls. ResultsEpithelial quick scores of M1 (CD11c) in NOM, Stages 1–4 OSF, and WDSCC with and without OSF were 0, 1.8, 2.9, 0.4, 0, 0, and 0, while connective tissue scores were 0, 3.2, 4.3, 2.7, 0.5, 1.2, and 2.4, respectively. Epithelial scores for M2 (CD163) were 0, 0.8, 0.8, 2.1, 0.6, 0.8, and 0.2, and connective tissue scores were 0, 1.8, 2.6, 3.9, 2.2, 5, and 4.4, respectively. Stages 3 and 4 OSF, WDSCC with and without OSF exhibited higher M2/M1 ratios compared to NOM and Stages 1–2 OSF. ConclusionThe interaction between M1 (CD11c) and M2 (CD163) macrophages, leading to M2 polarisation, plays a crucial role in the pathogenesis of OSF and its potential malignant transformation.

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales sepsis following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: risk factors for 30-day all-cause mortality and the development of a nomogram based on a retrospective cohort

BackgroundEndoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has become a routine endoscopic procedure that is essential for diagnosing and managing various conditions, including gallstone extraction and the treatment of bile duct and pancreatic tumors. Despite its efficacy, post-ERCP infections – particularly those caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) – present significant risks. These risks highlight the need for accurate predictive models to enhance postprocedural care, reduce the mortality risk associated with post-ERCP CRE sepsis, and improve patient outcomes in the context of increasing antibiotic resistance.ObjectiveThis study aimed to examine the risk factors for 30-day mortality in patients with CRE sepsis following ERCP and to develop a nomogram for accurately predicting 30-day mortality risk.MethodsData from 195 patients who experienced post-ERCP CRE sepsis between January 2010 and December 2022 were analyzed. Variable selection was optimized via the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression model. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was then employed to develop a predictive model, which was evaluated in terms of discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility. Internal validation was achieved through bootstrapping.ResultsThe nomogram included the following predictors: age > 80 years (hazard ratio [HR] 2.61), intensive care unit (ICU) admission within 90 days prior to ERCP (HR 2.64), hypoproteinemia (HR 4.55), quick Pitt bacteremia score ≥ 2 (HR 2.61), post-ERCP pancreatitis (HR 2.52), inappropriate empirical therapy (HR 3.48), delayed definitive therapy (HR 2.64), and short treatment duration (< 10 days) (HR 5.03). The model demonstrated strong discrimination and calibration.ConclusionsThis study identified significant risk factors associated with 30-day mortality in patients with post-ERCP CRE sepsis and developed a nomogram to accurately predict this risk. This tool enables healthcare practitioners to provide personalized risk assessments and promptly administer appropriate therapies against CRE, thereby reducing mortality rates.

Relationship of C-reactive Protein/Serum Albumin Ratio and qPitt Bacteremia Score With An All-Cause In-Hospital Mortality in Patients With Bloodstream Infections.

Bloodstream infections remain a major cause of morbidity and mortality despite notable advances in their diagnosis and treatment. C-reactive protein/serum albumin ratio and the quick Pitt bacteremia score are two useful tools for clinicians to assess severity and predict mortality risk in patients with sepsis attributable to bloodstream infections. This study examined the relationship between C-reactive protein/serum albumin ratio and Q Pitt bacteremia score with all-cause in-hospital mortality in patients with bloodstream infections. Hospitalized adult patients with bacteremic bloodstream infections between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2021, were retrospectively reviewed. Patients' demographics and clinical and laboratory data were retrieved from patient electronic records. C-reactive protein/albumin ratio was calculated using CRP (mg/L) and serum albumin (g/L) values obtained within 24 hours of blood culture collection and quick Pitt bacteremia score was calculated for each patient with each of the five variables of the score determined within 24 hours of blood culture collection and each patient was assigned a numerical score of 0-5 accordingly. The relationship between C-reactive protein/albumin ratio and quick Pitt bacteremia score with all-cause in-hospital mortality was determined. A total of 187 hospitalized adult patients with non-repeat bacteremic bloodstream infections were identified.Escherichia coliwas the most common Gram-negative blood isolate whileStaphylococcus aureuswas the predominant Gram-positive isolate. One hundred and five (56.1%) patients were male with a cohort mean age of 56.9 ± 2.7 years. All-cause in-hospital mortality was 27.3%. The mean CRP/albumin ratio (8.6 ±1.7) and mean quick Pitt bacteremia score (2.8 ±0.4) were significantly higher in patients with bloodstream infections who died during their hospitalization compared to those who survived. The all-cause in-hospital mortality was 8%, 12%, 22%, 46%, 93%, and 100% for patients with quick Pitt scores of 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively. In hospitalized patients with bacteremic bloodstream infections, an incremental increase in quick Pitt bacteremia score and mean C-reactive protein/albumin ratio of >8 was associated with higher mortality.

Association between glutathione S-transferases M1 expression and treatment outcome in germ cell tumor patients.

Cisplatin-based chemotherapy is the mainstay in the treatment of germ cell tumors (GCTs). Glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) are polymorphic enzymes that catalyze the glutathione conjugation of alkylating agents, platinum compounds, and free radicals formed by chemotherapy and are thus implicated in developing treatment resistance. This study aimed to assess the expression level of GST mu 1 (GSTM1) and its association with treatment outcomes in patients with GCT. This translational study included tumor specimens from 207 patients with newly diagnosed GCTs, as well as cisplatin-sensitive GCT cell line xenografts and their resistant variants for all histological variants of GCTs. GSTM1 expression was detected by reverse transcription-quantitative PCR and immunohistochemistry using monoclonal antibodies, scored by the multiplicative quickscore (QS) method. GSTM1 expression was correlated with patient/tumor characteristics and treatment outcomes. The highest GSTM1 expression was observed in seminoma, followed by choriocarcinoma, embryonal carcinoma, and yolk sac tumor, while the lowest was observed in teratoma (p<0.0001). There was no association between GSTM1 expression in tumor tissue and patient/tumor characteristics. The low GSTM1 expression was associated with significantly better relapse-free survival compared with high GSTM1 (HR=0.50, 95% CI 0.23-1.09, p=0.03) but not overall survival (HR=0.61, 95% CI 0.24-1.54, p=0.22). Multivariate analysis showed that the prognostic value of GSTM1 was independent of the International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group (IGCCCG) score. These data revealed the prognostic value of GSTM1 in GCTs, with a high GSTM1 expression associated with worse outcomes, suggesting that GSTM1 could be responsible, in part, for treatment resistance in GCTs.

Bloodstream infection: Derivation and validation of a reliable and multidimensional prognostic score based on a machine learning model (BLISCO)

A bloodstream infection (BSI) prognostic score applicable at the time of blood culturecollection is missing. In total, 4,327 patients with BSIs were included, divided into a derivation (80%) and a validation dataset (20%). Forty-two variables among host-related, demographic, epidemiological, clinical, andlaboratory extracted from the electronic health records were analyzed. Logistic regression was chosen for predictive scoring. The 14-day mortality model included age, body temperature, blood urea nitrogen, respiratory insufficiency, plateletcount, high-sensitive C-reactive protein, and consciousness status: a score of ≥6 was correlated to a 14-day mortality rate of 15% with a sensitivity of 0.742, a specificity of 0.727, and an area under the curve of0.783. The 30-day mortality model further included cardiovascular diseases: a score of ≥6 predicting 30-day mortality rate of 15% with a sensitivity of 0.691, a specificity of 0.699, and an area under the curve of0.697. A quick mortality score could represent a valid support for prognosis assessment and resources prioritizing for patients with BSIs not admitted inthe intensive care unit.

The Usefulness of Strain Echocardiography as Diagnostic and Prognostic Index of Cardiac Dysfunction in Septic Patients in Correlation with Cardiac Biomarkers.

Compared to standard echocardiography, speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) looks more accurate for the detection of subclinical dysfunction of the myocardium. The aim of our work was to assess the value of STE in the diagnosis of subclinical ventricular dysfunction and as a prognostic index in sepsis patients. An observational prospective study involving critically ill patients aged ≥ 18 years diagnosed with sepsis or septic shock. All patients were subjected to full history-taking, clinical assessment, and scoring system, including Acute Physiology and Chronic Health (APACHE) II score and quick sequential organ failure assessment score. Investigations were done for all patients, including laboratory (complete blood count, C-reactive protein, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide [NT-proBNP], and troponin-I and serum lactate level), ECG, and echocardiographic examination (conventional and speckle tracking) for measurement of global left ventricular strain. This study involved 50 patients, nine patients with sepsis and 41 patients with septic shock. Regarding cardiac biomarkers, the mean value of troponin-I was 0.18 ± 0.05 ng/L and for NT-proBNP was 1228.2 ± 832.9 pmol/L. All patients in the study had elevated lactate levels. There was a significant correlation between global longitudinal strain (GLS) and troponin I, NT-proBNP, and lactate levels after 3 days of admission. GLS, lactate, NT-proBNP, troponin levels, and APACHE II Score were significant predictors of mortality with a sensitivity of 76.5%, 88.2%, 88.2%, 76.5%, and 88.2%, respectively. GLS measured by speckle tracking echocardiography looks to be a sensitive diagnostic tool for early detection of subclinical left ventricular dysfunction in patients with sepsis in addition to be a sensitive predictor of in-hospital mortality.

Predictive scores for critically ill obstetric patients in a resource‐limited setting: A retrospective validation of the Obstetric Early Warning Score.

Background. In South Africa (SA), an unacceptably high institutional maternal mortality rate persists due to failure to recognise critically ill patients. Early warning systems could assist in identifying these patients sooner. Objectives. We evaluated the Obstetric Early Warning Score (OEWS) as a predictor of maternal outcomes in an intensive care unit (ICU) and compared its prognostic validity with the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II and the quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (qSOFA). Methods. Data were extracted on pregnant and post-partum ICU-admitted patients at a tertiary and regional centre in SA between October 2015 and April 2020. Clinical characteristics and outcomes were used to compare the three scoring systems. Results. Among 251 eligible patients, the mortality rate was 8.5%. The OEWS score failed to differentiate between survivors and non-survivors (odds ratio 1.13, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.972 - 1.311, p=0.113). APACHE II outperformed the OEWS (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) 0.69, 95% CI 0.540 - 0.846 v. 0.55, 95% CI 0.430 - 0.674). The OEWS (AUROC 0.55, 95% CI 0.430 - 0.674) and qSOFA (AUROC 0.60, 95% CI 0.500 - 0.703) showed no differences. Further analysis revealed that positive scoring for diastolic blood pressure and high systolic blood pressure weakened OEWS performance. Removing these variables improved OEWS prediction (AUROC 0.68). Conclusion. In a SA obstetric population, OEWS did not predict mortality in ICU-admitted patients and offered no advantages over APACHE II or qSOFA scores. Further research should identify critical outcome predictors for low-resource populations.