Question Entailment Research Articles

Identifying the Question Similarity of Regulatory Documents in the Pharmaceutical Industry by Using the Recognizing Question Entailment System: Evaluation Study.

The regulatory affairs (RA) division in a pharmaceutical establishment is the point of contact between regulatory authorities and pharmaceutical companies. They are delegated the crucial and strenuous task of extracting and summarizing relevant information in the most meticulous manner from various search systems. An artificial intelligence (AI)-based intelligent search system that can significantly bring down the manual efforts in the existing processes of the RA department while maintaining and improving the quality of final outcomes is desirable. We proposed a "frequently asked questions" component and its utility in an AI-based intelligent search system in this paper. The scenario is further complicated by the lack of publicly available relevant data sets in the RA domain to train the machine learning models that can facilitate cognitive search systems for regulatory authorities. In this study, we aimed to use AI-based intelligent computational models to automatically recognize semantically similar question pairs in the RA domain and evaluate the Recognizing Question Entailment-based system. We used transfer learning techniques and experimented with transformer-based models pretrained on corpora collected from different resources, such as Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT), Clinical BERT, BioBERT, and BlueBERT. We used a manually labeled data set that contained 150 question pairs in the pharmaceutical regulatory domain to evaluate the performance of our model. The Clinical BERT model performed better than other domain-specific BERT-based models in identifying question similarity from the RA domain. The BERT model had the best ability to learn domain-specific knowledge with transfer learning, which reached the best performance when fine-tuned with sufficient clinical domain question pairs. The top-performing model achieved an accuracy of 90.66% on the test set. This study demonstrates the possibility of using pretrained language models to recognize question similarity in the pharmaceutical regulatory domain. Transformer-based models that are pretrained on clinical notes perform better than models pretrained on biomedical text in recognizing the question's semantic similarity in this domain. We also discuss the challenges of using data augmentation techniques to address the lack of relevant data in this domain. The results of our experiment indicated that increasing the number of training samples using back translation and entity replacement did not enhance the model's performance. This lack of improvement may be attributed to the intricate and specialized nature of texts in the regulatory domain. Our work provides the foundation for further studies that apply state-of-the-art linguistic models to regulatory documents in the pharmaceutical industry.

Epidemic Question Answering: question generation and entailment for Answer Nugget discovery.

The rapidly growing body of communications during the COVID-19 pandemic posed a challenge to information seekers, who struggled to find answers to their specific and changing information needs. We designed a Question Answering (QA) system capable of answering ad-hoc questions about the COVID-19 disease, its causal virus SARS-CoV-2, and the recommended response to the pandemic. The QA system incorporates, in addition to relevance models, automatic generation of questions from relevant sentences. We relied on entailment between questions for (1) pinpointing answers and (2) selecting novel answers early in the list of its results. The QA system produced state-of-the-art results when processing questions asked by experts (eg, researchers, scientists, or clinicians) and competitive results when processing questions asked by consumers of health information. Although state-of-the-art models for question generation and question entailment were used, more than half of the answers were missed, due to the limitations of the relevance models employed. Although question entailment enabled by automatic question generation is the cornerstone of our QA system's architecture, question entailment did not prove to always be reliable or sufficient in ranking the answers. Question entailment should be enhanced with additional inferential capabilities. The QA system presented in this article produced state-of-the-art results processing expert questions and competitive results processing consumer questions. Improvements should be considered by using better relevance models and enhanced inference methods. Moreover, experts and consumers have different answer expectations, which should be accounted for in future QA development.

Question Entailment on Developing Indonesian Covid-19 Question Answering System

Despite the severe impact of COVID-19 on humans has already decreased, people still need to be aware of the recent disease information. A continually updated Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) system could help the public get valid and relevant information. To maintain a FAQ system manually needs much effort, hence an approach to develop the system automatically is needed. Question Answering System (QAS) is a system that can accept input in question sentences and produces an answer quickly, concisely, and relevantly, and could be used to provide COVID-19 information to the public. One method on developing a QAS is Recognizing Question Entailment (RQE). RQE is a form of relationship based on a cause-and-effect relationship between two pieces of text called text (T) and hypothesis (H). We present a study on developing Covid-19 QAS in Bahasa Indonesia using RQE. The datasets are collected from reputable sources and consist of 725 pairs of questions and answers. The experimental results show that the best performance results were obtained using the Logistic Regression model in training set 1, which contains 54.2% of positive question pairs and 45.8% of negative question pairs with an f-measure value of 83.65%. These results indicate that the RQE method can identify the entailment between new questions and questions in the dataset well.

Biomedical Question Answering: A Survey of Approaches and Challenges

Automatic Question Answering (QA) has been successfully applied in various domains such as search engines and chatbots. Biomedical QA (BQA), as an emerging QA task, enables innovative applications to effectively perceive, access, and understand complex biomedical knowledge. There have been tremendous developments of BQA in the past two decades, which we classify into five distinctive approaches: classic, information retrieval, machine reading comprehension, knowledge base, and question entailment approaches. In this survey, we introduce available datasets and representative methods of each BQA approach in detail. Despite the developments, BQA systems are still immature and rarely used in real-life settings. We identify and characterize several key challenges in BQA that might lead to this issue, and we discuss some potential future directions to explore.

A question-entailment approach to question answering

BackgroundOne of the challenges in large-scale information retrieval (IR) is developing fine-grained and domain-specific methods to answer natural language questions. Despite the availability of numerous sources and datasets for answer retrieval, Question Answering (QA) remains a challenging problem due to the difficulty of the question understanding and answer extraction tasks. One of the promising tracks investigated in QA is mapping new questions to formerly answered questions that are “similar”.ResultsWe propose a novel QA approach based on Recognizing Question Entailment (RQE) and we describe the QA system and resources that we built and evaluated on real medical questions. First, we compare logistic regression and deep learning methods for RQE using different kinds of datasets including textual inference, question similarity, and entailment in both the open and clinical domains. Second, we combine IR models with the best RQE method to select entailed questions and rank the retrieved answers. To study the end-to-end QA approach, we built the MedQuAD collection of 47,457 question-answer pairs from trusted medical sources which we introduce and share in the scope of this paper. Following the evaluation process used in TREC 2017 LiveQA, we find that our approach exceeds the best results of the medical task with a 29.8% increase over the best official score.ConclusionsThe evaluation results support the relevance of question entailment for QA and highlight the effectiveness of combining IR and RQE for future QA efforts. Our findings also show that relying on a restricted set of reliable answer sources can bring a substantial improvement in medical QA.