Reviewed by: Categorically Famous: Literary Celebrity and Sexual Liberation in 1960s America by Guy Davidson Jeff Solomon Guy Davidson. Categorically Famous: Literary Celebrity and Sexual Liberation in 1960s America. Stanford UP, 2019. 227 pp. How can there be queer celebrities when sexual queerness itself is censored? Guy Davidson incisively explores this paradox through the literary careers of three mid-century US writers—James Baldwin, Susan Sontag, and Gore Vidal—whose queerness was undeniably present and presently deniable in the public eye and ear, even as it contributed to their celebrity. All three constantly invoked homosexuality, either directly in their work or indirectly in their literary personae, though they actively denied or passively refused to confirm their own sexual practice. They certainly had no desire to be queer icons or activists—or, if they did, they kept that interest private. Baldwin was highly invested in his value as an icon of the Civil Rights movement and knew that his homosexuality lessened his public value to the movement. Nonetheless, he offers a preeminent example of gay fame or, as Davidson describes it, proto-gay fame, as gayness in the post-Stonewall, identitarian sense was still coagulating. Sontag was not proto-lesbian as Baldwin was proto-gay, but her association with camp and other aspects of gay male culture indicates how "gay male culture, as the most widely publicized version of queerness, may enable other kinds of queer cross-identification" (5). At the same time, she rigorously maintained her straight bona fides. While Vidal's fiction and life were preoccupied with homosexual acts, Vidal himself, a queer theorist avant la lettre, took great relish in insisting that homosexuality was an act unto itself, independent from any orientation, much less the marker of a distinct population. Nonetheless, Vidal, like Sontag and Baldwin, was unable to control either his celebrity or its association with homosexuality. Davidson explains how the specifics of public life in the 1960s led to a strange parallel between the status of celebrity and homosexuality, as both were entangled with sexual liberation. The changes in the parameters of acceptable inquiry into the private lives of public figures were coeval with the same forces that shaped gay men and women into a newly politicized minority. If the personal is the political, then so was the sex life of James Baldwin, whether he wrote about it or not. And he did not: There are only three mentions of homosexuality in all his nonfiction, all considered by Davidson, though sexual queerness suffuses Baldwin's novels. Davidson carefully explains how these three writers—who, for most or all of their lives, did not assert a gay or lesbian identity—nonetheless served the nascence of gay and lesbian liberation. And as homosexuality was "fundamental to the [End Page 590] cultural shifts and the political effects collected under the differently weighted but overlapping rubrics of the 'sexual revolution' and the 'counterculture'" (13), so the queerness of these writers reverberated through 1960s US culture, and not just in queer communities. For the counterculture, "unorthodox lifeways constitute forms of political resistance" (187), and homosexuality was the least orthodox form at large in the public eye. One of the most valuable aspects of Categorically Famous is Davidson's analysis of how Sontag's celebrity relates to her simultaneous identification with and distancing from gay male culture. How did "Notes on 'Camp'"—an analysis, tribute, and repudiation that anticipated the counterculture through its fusion of politics and unorthodox sexual styles—place Sontag so firmly within the proscenium of the public intellectuals? Sontag's repudiation of her own queerness is not surprising, but her indirect assertion of it is. Davidson illustrates how, despite the claims of "Against Interpretation," "responses to [Sontag's] persona indicate that erotics and hermeneutics are not easily separated" (86). Her overt eschewal of the personal is contradicted by the "flirtation with the autobiographical—and the sexual—that flickers through and tempers [her] otherwise austerely deindividualized style" (73). Davidson reconciles Sontag's studied performance of a celebrity intellectual with her frequently reproduced glamour shots, which use Hollywood Golden Age techniques to halo her supposed austerity, and shows how her critical devotion to form rather than content often served as "a...