'A MAN wanting to set down a picture of the society of England will find his models at the games' (Masefield, v)-so wrote the former Poet Laureate, John Masefield. His comment underlines the importance of sport in the patterns of traditional English upper-class life-style.' And of all sports, none is perhaps more the object of mawkish sentiment, nationalistic fervour, class warfare and general controversy, than foxhunting. A popular idyllic scene on Beautiful Britain calendars, it is not in fact an ancient sport. Hunting with hounds was a favourite pastime from Saxon times onward, but though it was known at least as early as Edward I's reign (1239-1307), foxes were not hunted regularly till the latter part of the seventeenth century. Before that time they were thought of as vermin and killed by farmers. During the Middle Ages and later hunting was an aristocratic diversion, though usually with a practical end-product: wolves, for example, were dangerous animals which had to be killed, and hare, boar, and deer provided food. Today the correlation of pastime and class remains largely unchanged, because hunting was, and still is, an expensive sport. In the nineteenth century, when money was worth much more, it cost the Master of a Hunt between ?2,000 and ?4,000 a year to maintain his own packs of hounds and underwrite the organisation. Only wealthy landowners could afford to do this, and by the end of Queen Victoria's reign (1901) most hunts were under subscription; few private packs were left. Subscriptions vary from ?15 to as much as ?75. There is also the cost of a saddle, a good horse and its upkeep, and of course the correct outfit. In his Memoirs of a Fox-Hunting Man the poet Siegfried Sassoon (b. 1896) describes his feelings of social discomfort on appearing improperly dressed at his first hunt:
Read full abstract