Quantitative Risk Assessment For Skin Sensitization Research Articles

Predicting points of departure and potency categories for fragrance ingredients by integrating OECD in vitro models

Continuous potency assessment is crucial for conducting quantitative risk assessment (QRA) of sensitizers. Quantitative regression models, based on in vitro methods, have been developed to calculate points of departure for use in skin sensitization QRA. These models calculate a point of departure as a predicted value for Local Lymph Node Assay (LLNA) EC3 or potency value (PV), integrating data from the kinetic Direct Peptide Reactivity Assay (kDPRA), KeratinoSens (KS) assay, and human Cell Line Activation Test (h-CLAT). The goal of this study was to determine how in vitro predicted EC3s and PVs compare to published reference data. In vitro data were combined in point of departure regression models to predict EC3s and PVs. These points of departure were then grouped into sensitization potency categories, such as extreme, strong, moderate, weak, very weak, or non-sensitizer, as previously described. Trends in potency distribution and high concordance between predicted EC3 and PV categories and published potency categories were observed. Furthermore, the median absolute fold-misprediction ranged between 1.8 and 2.5 for models predicting EC3 and between 1.7 and 3.4 for those predicting PVs. These regression models are a promising animal alternative for determining sensitization quantitative potency for fragrance ingredients, thereby facilitating QRA.

Updating exposure assessment for skin sensitization quantitative risk assessment for fragrance materials

In 2008, a proposal for assessing the risk of induction of skin sensitization to fragrance materials Quantitative Risk Assessment 1 (QRA1) was published. This was implemented for setting maximum limits for fragrance materials in consumer products. However, there was no formal validation or empirical verification after implementation. Additionally, concerns remained that QRA1 did not incorporate aggregate exposure from multiple product use and included assumptions, e.g. safety assessment factors (SAFs), that had not been critically reviewed. Accordingly, a review was undertaken, including detailed re-evaluation of each SAF together with development of an approach for estimating aggregate exposure of the skin to a potential fragrance allergen. This revision of QRA1, termed QRA2, provides an improved method for establishing safe levels for sensitizing fragrance materials in multiple products to limit the risk of induction of contact allergy. The use of alternative non-animal methods is not within the scope of this paper. Ultimately, only longitudinal clinical studies can verify the utility of QRA2 as a tool for the prevention of contact allergy to fragrance materials.

Skin sensitization quantitative risk assessment for occupational exposure of hairdressers to hair dye ingredients

Occupational exposure of hairdressers to hair dyes has been associated with the development of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) involving the hands. p-Phenylenediamine (PPD) and toluene-2,5-diamine (PTD) have been implicated as important occupational contact allergens. To conduct a quantitative risk assessment for the induction of contact sensitization to hair dyes in hairdressers, available data from hand rinsing studies following typical occupational exposure conditions to PPD, PTD and resorcinol were assessed. By accounting for wet work, uneven exposure and inter-individual variability for professionals, daily hand exposure concentrations were derived. Secondly, daily hand exposure was compared with the sensitization induction potency of the individual hair dye defined as the No Expected Sensitization Induction Levels (NESIL). For PPD and PTD hairdresser hand exposure levels were 2.7 and 5.9 fold below the individual NESIL. In contrast, hand exposure to resorcinol was 50 fold below the NESIL. Correspondingly, the risk assessment for PPD and PTD indicates that contact sensitization may occur, when skin protection and skin care are not rigorously applied. We conclude that awareness of health risks associated with occupational exposure to hair dyes, and of the importance of adequate protective measures, should be emphasized more fully during hairdresser education and training.

Application of in vitro skin penetration measurements to confirm and refine the quantitative skin sensitization risk assessment of methylisothiazolinone

Use of quantitative risk assessment (QRA) for assessing the skin sensitization potential of chemicals present in consumer products requires an understanding of hazard and product exposure. In the absence of data, consumer exposure is based on relevant habits and practices and assumes 100% skin uptake of the applied dose. To confirm and refine the exposure, a novel design for in vitro skin exposure measurements was conducted with the preservative, methylisothiazolinone (MI), in beauty care (BC) and household care (HHC) products using realistic consumer exposure conditions. A difference between measured exposure levels (MELs) for MI in leave-on versus rinse-off BC products, and lower MELs for MI in HHC rinse-off compared to BC products was demonstrated. For repeated product applications, the measured exposure was lower than estimations based on summation of applied amounts. Compared to rinse-off products, leave-on applications resulted in higher MELs, correlating with the higher incidences of allergic contact dermatitis associated with those product types. Lower MELs for MI in rinse-off products indicate a lower likelihood to induce skin sensitization, also after multiple daily applications. These in vitro skin exposure measurements indicate conservatism of default exposure estimates applied in skin sensitization QRA and might be helpful in future risk assessments.

Probabilistic derivation of the interspecies assessment factor for skin sensitization

An interspecies sensitization assessment factor (SAF) is used in the quantitative risk assessment (QRA) for skin sensitization when a murine-based NESIL (No Expected Sensitization Induction Level) is taken as point of departure. Several studies showed that, on average, the murine sensitization threshold is in good correspondence with that determined in humans. However, on an individual level, the murine and human sensitization thresholds may differ considerably. In this study, the interspecies SAF was quantified by using a probabilistic approach, to be able to take these cases into account. As expected, the geometric means of the probability distributions of murine and human sensitization threshold ratios were close to one, but taking the 95 th percentile of these distributions resulted in an interspecies SAF of 15. By using this value, one is sure that with 95% probability, the sensitization threshold determined in mice does not underestimate the human threshold. It can be concluded that a murine-based NESIL requires the use of an interspecies SAF (of 15) in the QRA for skin sensitization, to correct for the differences between mice and humans. This empirically derived interspecies SAF contributes to refinement of the risk assessment methodology.

Quantitative risk assessment for skin sensitization: Success or failure?

Skin sensitization is unique in the world of toxicology. There is a combination of reliable, validated predictive test methods for identification of skin sensitizing chemicals, a clearly documented and transparent approach to risk assessment, and effective feedback from dermatology clinics around the world delivering evidence of the success or failure of the hazard identification/risk assessment/management process. Recent epidemics of contact allergy, particularly to preservatives, have raised questions of whether the safety/risk assessment process is working in an optimal manner (or indeed is working at all!). This review has as its focus skin sensitization quantitative risk assessment (QRA). The core toxicological principles of QRA are reviewed, and evidence of use and misuse examined. What becomes clear is that skin sensitization QRA will only function adequately if two essential criteria are met. The first is that QRA is applied rigourously, and the second is that potential exposure to the sensitizing substance is assessed adequately. This conclusion will come as no surprise to any toxicologist who appreciates the basic premise that “risk = hazard x exposure”. Accordingly, use of skin sensitization QRA is encouraged, not least because the essential feedback from dermatology clinics can be used as a tool to refine QRA in situations where this risk assessment tool has not been properly used.

Skin sensitization quantitative risk assessment: A review of underlying assumptions

Toxicological risk assessment informs exposure limits, so the potential for adverse effects to human health are minimised or avoided. For skin sensitisers, the situation is complicated by asymptomatic induction of contact allergy, a necessary prerequisite for expression of the disease allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). For fragrance skin sensitisers, the development of quantitative risk assessment (QRA) arose from the need to improve the extent to which contact allergy occurred. However, the perceived impact has been less than anticipated. Accordingly, the science and assumptions upon which QRA was founded have been scrutinised and proposals for refinement have been made. In addition, areas of uncertainty have been made explicit, e.g. inter-individual variability and the impact of concomitant disease, clarifying where numerical safety assessment factors are based on expert judgement. Also, the relatively small contribution of factors eg. age, gender, ethnic origin, vehicle matrix and skin permeability are highlighted by reference to the (now controversial) human experiments carried out in the second half of the last century. Adoption and widespread implementation of the current recommendations for QRA, taken in concert with improved assessment of aggregate exposure from multiple sources, should ensure that the frequency of contact allergy will decrease over the coming years.

Preservatives and Skin Sensitization Quantitative Risk Assessment

Preservatives are an unfortunately common cause of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). Often, this is in association with exposure to cosmetics or medicaments. Recently, a quantitative risk assessment (QRA) approach to the quantitation of safe exposure levels for sensitizers has been promulgated as a more effective tool for the identification of acceptable levels of potential sensitizers in consumer products. To assess this QRA approach, which facilitates the prediction of acceptable exposure levels to skin sensitizers in consumer products, levels that are normally below the threshold for the induction of skin sensitization. Retrospective QRA analysis on four preservatives in five consumer product types. The analysis shows that functional levels of preservatives may be somewhat above an ideal exposure level for some product types, an outcome that is consistent with the clinical picture. QRA represents a new tool that in the future should be used in combination with the assessment of microbiologic protection needs of specific product types to limit the problem of preservative ACD.