Quantitative Nucleic Acid Sequence-based Amplification Research Articles

Characterization of the quantitative HCV NASBA assay

A quantitative nucleic acid sequence-based amplification assay (NASBA-QT) for detection of hepatitis C virus RNA (HCV-RNA) was evaluated and compared with the HCV branched-DNA (bDNA) assay (Chiron Corporation) and the HCV MONITOR assay (Roche Diagnostic Systems). For this evaluation five panels were designed: (1) serial dilutions of genotype 1b in-vitro HCV-RNA; (2) standards of in-vitro HCV-RNA genotypes 1a, 1b, 2, 3, 4, and 5; (3) a proficiency panel consisting of 12 HCV-RNA positive plasma samples of different genotypes and HCV-RNA concentrations and a genotype 1a and 1b 3-fold dilution series; (4) a panel of 67 HCV-RNA positive plasma samples obtained from patients with HCV infection and (5) an HCV-RNA positive control sample, diluted 50-fold in 25 different HCV-RNA negative plasma samples. The quantitative detection limit was found to be 10 3 copies per 100 μl and the qualitative detection limit 10 2.3 per 100 μl. The amplification efficiency was independent of the plasma matrix, but dependent on the HCV genotype. The HCV NASBA-QT assay was more than 10 times as sensitive as the bDNA assay while the quantitative results of both assays were highly concordant. The HCV NASBA-QT assay was comparable in sensitivity with the HCV MONITOR assay, but the HCV MONITOR assay yielded consistently lower values. It is concluded that the HCV NASBA-QT assay is a reliable assay for quantitative HCV-RNA detection in various settings.

Safety and efficacy of lamivudine-zidovudine combination therapy in zidovudine-experienced patients. A randomized controlled comparison with zidovudine monotherapy. Lamivudine European HIV Working Group

To compare the safety and efficacy of 2 doses of lamivudine given in combination with zidovudine with continued zidovudine monotherapy. Double-blind, randomized, multicenter, comparative trial of 223 patients treated for 24 weeks. Patients from 32 hospitals in Europe were enrolled throughout a 1-year period. Adult human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-positive, zidovudine-experienced ( > or = 24 weeks prior zidovudine) patients with CD4+ cell counts between 0.10 and 0.40 x 10(9)/L (100-400 cells/microL). Patients received either 200 mg of zidovudine every 8 hours, 150 mg of lamivudine every 12 hours plus zidovudine, or 300 mg of lamivudine every 12 hours plus zidovudine for 24 weeks. All patients were then allowed to receive zidovudine and open-label lamivudine combination therapy. Twelve patients withdrew because of adverse events during the 24-week treatment period. Efficacy was measured by evaluating immunological and viral load changes, and safety was assessed by evaluating clinical manifestations and laboratory indexes of toxic effects. Patients receiving low- or high-dose combination therapy had greater treatment effects compared with patients receiving continued zidovudine monotherapy during the first 24 weeks as documented by changes in CD4+ cell counts (+0.04 vs +0.03 vs -0.02 x 10(9)/L, respectively; P < .001); log10 HIV-1 RNA as measured by the Roche assay (-0.96 vs -0.77 vs +0.07 copies/mL, respectively; P < .001) or log10 HIV-1 RNA measured by the quantitative nucleic acid sequence-based amplification assay (-0.59 vs -1.06 vs -0.02 copies/mL, respectively; P < .011); and immune-complex dissociated (ICD) p24 antigen (-74% vs -68% vs +27%, respectively; P < .001). There were no statistically significant differences in viral measurements, in CD4+ cell counts, or in safety profile between the groups receiving 2 doses of lamivudine in combination with zidovudine. The effects on CD4+ cell counts and ICD p24 antigen were sustained throughout 48 weeks for patients continuing combination therapy. Patients switching to combination therapy at week 24 showed improvement. In zidovudine-experienced HIV-1-infected patients, combination treatment with lamivudine and zidovudine is well tolerated and provides greater and more sustained increases in CD4+ cell counts and decreases in viral load than continued zidovudine monotherapy.