Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis Score Research Articles

Initiation response, maximized therapeutic efficacy, and post-treatment effects of biological targeted therapies in myasthenia gravis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

BackgroundAs targeted drug development in myasthenia gravis (MG) continues to advance, it is important to compare the efficacy of these drugs for better clinical decision-making. However, due to the varied regimens and dosages used in clinical trials for different drugs, a standardized comparison between them is necessary.MethodsThis study enrolled participants in phase II and III trials of innovative targeted drugs for MG. The primary outcome was the change in Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis score (MG-QMG) from baseline. The efficacy of all drugs at four time points was separately analyzed at four time points: initiation 1 week, initiation 4 weeks, maximized response, and post last dose 4 weeks. A network meta-analysis was conducted to compare the results of the different drugs.ResultsA total of 9 drugs, including Efgartigimod, Rozanolixizumab, Batoclimab, Eculizumab, Belimumab, Zilucoplan, Ravulizumab, Nipocalimab, Rituximab, derived from 12 studies were analyzed. At the initiation 1-week time point, three drugs exhibited significant improvement compared to the placebo effect: Efgartigimod, Zilucoplan, Rozanolixizumab. At the initiation 4-week time point, four drugs showed significant improvement compared to the placebo effect: Efgartigimod, Rozanolixizumab, Batoclimab, Zilucoplan. At the maximized response time point, six drugs achieved significant improvement compared to the placebo effect: Efgartigimod, Rozanolixizumab, Batoclimab, Eculizumab, Zilucoplan, Ravulizumab. At the post last dose 4-week point, all drugs statistically showed no significant difference from the placebo.ConclusionAlthough the MG subtypes were not consistent across trials, within the regimen design of each trial, neonatal Fc receptor inhibitors—represented by Efgartigimod, Rozanolixizumab, and Batoclimab—exhibited the most effective response rates when compared to complement and B-cell inhibitor drugs.

Efgartigimod treatment for generalized myasthenia gravis: a single-center case series of 16 patients.

Efgartigimod was approved in Japan in January 2022 for the treatment of generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG), regardless of antibody status. This case series describes a real-world experience in Japan of efgartigimod treatment for gMG patients with diverse backgrounds. We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 16 Japanese patients (11 females and five males, mean age 40.4 years) with gMG who received efgartigimod at the Kumamoto University Hospital between August 2022 and September 2023. The outcomes were Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) responders (≥ 3 point reduction), IgG levels, and change in prednisolone dose, in the first cycle of efgartigimod. Fifteen patients completed one cycle of efgartigimod. Of the 14 patients for whom QMG scores were obtained, 10 patients were QMG responders. Four of the five patients with Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America class V were QMG responders. Improvement in QMG after efgartigimod treatment was observed in one patient with myasthenic crisis and in one refractory patient who had unsuccessful eculizumab treatment. The mean reductions from baseline in IgG levels at weeks 1, 2, 3, and follow-up were 38.3, 56.1, 63.1, and 43.9%, respectively. A decrease in prednisolone dose was observed in seven patients. The most common adverse events were headache (three patients) and diarrhea (two patients). One patient discontinued efgartigimod treatment due to a treatment-related adverse event of rash. Improvements in the outcomes of patients with gMG, including patients with severe gMG, myasthenic crisis, and refractory to anti-complementary therapy, were observed after the first cycle of efgartigimod treatment. Our real-world experience in Japan suggests the future possibilities for the treatment with efgartigimod for gMG with diverse backgrounds.

Time to response with ravulizumab, a long-acting terminal complement inhibitor, in adults with anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive generalized myasthenia gravis.

The efficacy and safety of ravulizumab, a terminal complement C5 inhibitor, in adults with anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive (AChR Ab+) generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) were demonstrated in the CHAMPION MG study (NCT03920293). This analysis aimed to characterize the latency to onset of a clinically meaningful therapeutic effect for ravulizumab. Post hoc analysis of data collected for up to 60 weeks from CHAMPION MG was performed to assess the timing of response to ravulizumab. Response was analyzed based on reductions of ≥2 and ≥3 points (minimal clinically important differences [MCIDs]) in Myasthenia Gravis-Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) and Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) total scores, respectively, and on more rigorous reductions of ≥3 and ≥5 points, respectively. Time to first response was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier product-limit method. The median (95% confidence interval) time to first response was 2.1 (2.1-2.6) and 4.1 (2.3-10.0) weeks for reductions of ≥2 and ≥3 points in MG-ADL total score, respectively (n = 139), and 4.1 (2.1-10.0) and 18.3 (11.0-33.4) weeks for reductions of ≥3 and ≥5 points in QMG total score, respectively (n = 134). Cumulative response rates at Week 60 (data cut-off) were 88% and 82% for ≥2- and ≥3-point MG-ADL score reductions, respectively, and 86% and 59% for ≥3- and ≥5-point QMG score reductions, respectively. The median times to MCID with ravulizumab treatment in patients with AChR Ab+ gMG were ~2 weeks and ~4 weeks based on MCID MG-ADL and QMG total score reductions, respectively.

Relationship between fatigue and quantitative electromyography findings in patients with myasthenia gravis

BackgroundFatigue is a common complaint among patients with myasthenia gravis (MG). In this study, we investigated the alterations in muscle morphology in patients with MG experiencing fatigue using quantitative electromyography (QEMG), and explored the relationship between electrophysiological findings and the severity of both fatigue and disease. MethodsWe performed QEMG of the biceps brachii muscle using the peak ratio method and multi-motor unit potential (MUP) analysis across three groups: 18 MG patients with fatigue, 34 MG patients without fatigue, and 33 healthy subjects. Stimulated single-fiber EMG was performed on the frontalis muscle. The severity of perceived fatigue and disease was subsequently assessed using the quantitative myasthenia gravis (QMG) score, the MG-activities of daily living (MG-ADL) profile, self-reported fatigue questionnaires, and handgrip strength measurements. ResultsThe QEMG study revealed a reduced mean MUP duration and size index (SI), in addition to an increased peak ratio in patients with MG (p < 0.05), which tended to be more pronounced in those experiencing fatigue. Compared to healthy subjects, MG patients with fatigue displayed a myopathic pattern characterised by a high peak ratio, short duration, and small-amplitude MUPs, without any increase in the number of phases or small time intervals. The mean peak ratio was positively correlated with the QMG, MG-ADL, and Fatigue Impact Scale total and physical subscores (p < 0.05). Further, MG patients with fatigue exhibited reduced maximum grip strength, which was positively correlated with the mean MUP duration, amplitude, SI, and thickness, and negatively correlated with the mean peak ratio (p < 0.05). No significant differences were observed in the jitter or block measurements (p > 0.05). ConclusionsThe present study investigated electrophysiological findings that were not considered or theorised in prior studies on patients with MG experiencing fatigue. The results of this study suggest that myopathic changes may be a critical pathophysiological component underlying the fatigue associated with MG.

Circulating CD45RA−Foxp3++ Treg cells serve as a biomarker for predicting minimal clinical manifestations status of myasthenia gravis

AimsRegulatory T cells (Tregs) are key mediators of the induction of immune tolerance; however, the mechanisms by which they regulate myasthenia gravis (MG) are not fully understood. This study aimed to explore the characteristics of Tregs and their subpopulations in the peripheral blood of patients with minimal clinical manifestations (MM) of MG and identify biomarkers that predict MM-MG for treatment guidance. Materials and methodsThe clinical data of patients with general MG who visited our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Age- and sex-matched volunteers were selected as healthy controls (HC). Flow cytometry was used to determine the proportion, function, and subpopulations of total Tregs. A correlation analysis was conducted for subpopulation proportions and MG disease severity. Key findingsA total of 27 cases of MM-MG, 40 cases of naїve-MG, and 33 cases of HC were included in this study. The number of total Tregs and the suppressive function of total Tregs were elevated in patients with MM-MG compared to those of patients with naїve-MG. Further analysis revealed that the frequency of CD45RA−Foxp3++ Tregs (a-Tregs) negatively correlated with quantitative myasthenia gravis (QMG) scores for patients with naїve-MG. In addition, the number of a-Tregs was significantly greater in patients with MM-MG than in patients with naїve-MG, and CD45RA−Foxp3+ Tregs expressed higher and lower levels of CTLA-4 and CXCR3, respectively. SignificanceCD45RA−Foxp3++ Tregs were significantly more abundant and highly expressed surface inhibitory molecules in patients with MM-MG. This profile may serve as a predictive biomarker for MM-MG.

Efficacy and safety of low-dose rituximab in the treatment of myasthenia gravis: a systemic review and meta-analysis.

Rituximab (RTX) is a monoclonal antibody that has been increasingly used in the treatment of myasthenia gravis (MG). In most studies, the therapeutic protocol of RTX has been similar to that adopted for B cell lymphoma, with an increasing number of studies aimed at exploring the efficacy of low-dose RTX in MG. However, the beneficial effects of low-dose RTX in MG remain a subject of critical debate. This study was conducted following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis) guidelines. Two reviewers (Xishuai Yang and Bingxia Li) independently conducted searches across multiple databases, including PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI). A meta-analysis, utilizing representative forest plots, was performed to assess "Improved clinical status" and changes in the Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) score before and after treatment. A total of 17 studies involving 292 patients were included in the meta-analysis. A noticeable improvement in clinical status was observed in 91% of patients at the final follow-up after therapy (95% CI: 84-96%, P < 0.001). The QMG score showed a significant reduction following the treatment, with a standardized mean difference (SMD) of -1.69 (95% CI: -2.21 to -1.16, Z = 6.29, P < 0.001). In the acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive myasthenia gravis (AChR-MG) group, 90% of patients achieved improved clinical status (95% CI: 80-97%, P < 0.001) and the QMG score significantly decreased after low-dose RTX treatment, with an SMD of -1.51 (95% CI: -0.80 to -2.21, Z = 4.50, P < 0.001). In the muscle-specific kinase antibody-positive myasthenia gravis (MuSK-MG) group, 97% of patients achieved improved clinical status (95% CI: 89-100%, P < 0.001). The QMG score also significantly decreased following low-dose RTX treatment, with an SMD of -2.31 (95% CI: -2.99 to -1.62, Z = 6.60, P < 0.001). Adverse effects were reported in 29 out of 207 patients (14%, including infusion reactions in 22 patients (10.1%), infections in three patients (1.45%), cytopenia in two patients (0.96%), eosinophilia in one patient (0.48%), and hemiplegia in one patient (0.48%). Additionally, one patient (0.48%) succumbed to complications from invasive thymoma. Our meta-analysis shows that low-dose RTX is both effective and safe for treating MG. PROSPERO, identifier: CRD42024509951.

Characterization of Clinical Phenotypes in Congenital Myasthenic Syndrome Associated with the c.1327delG Frameshift Mutation in CHRNE Encoding the Acetylcholine Receptor Epsilon Subunit.

Congenital myasthenic syndromes (CMS) are a group of rare but often treatable inherited disorders of neuromuscular transmission characterized by fatigable skeletal muscle weakness. In this paper we present the largest phenotypic analysis to date of a cohort of patients carrying the pathogenic variant c.1327delG in the CHRNE gene, leading to CHRNE-CMS. This study aims to identify the phenotypic variability in CMS associated with c.1327delG mutation in the CHRNE gene. Disease specific symptoms were assessed using specific standardized tests for autoimmune myasthenia (Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis score) as well as patient-reported scales for symptom severity. Evaluated clinical manifestations included ocular symptoms (ophthalmoparesis and ptosis), bulbar weakness, axial muscle weakness, proximal and distal muscle weakness, and respiratory function. Patients were allocated into three groups according to clinical impression of disease severity: mild, moderate, and severe. We studied 91 Bulgarian Roma patients, carrying the same causative homozygous CHRNE c.1327delG mutation. Bulbar weakness was present in patients throughout all levels of severity of CHRNE-CMS in this study. However, difficulties in eating and swallowing are more prominent characteristics in the moderate and severe clinical phenotypes. Diplopia and ptosis resulting from fatigue of the extraocular muscles were permanent features regardless of disease severity or age. Levels of axial, proximal and distal muscle weakness were variable between disease groups. The statistical analysis showed significant differences between the patients in the three groups, emphasizing a possible variation in symptom manifestation in the evaluated patient population despite the disease originating from the same genetic mutation. Impairment of respiratory function was more prominent in severely affected patients, which might result from loss of compensatory muscle function in those individuals. Results from our study indicate significant phenotypic heterogeneity leading to mild, moderate, or severe clinical manifestation in CHRNE-CMS, despite the genotypic homogeneity.

Efgartigimod as a fast-acting add-on therapy in manifest and impending myasthenic crisis: A single-center case series

Efgartigimod was the first-in-class neonatal Fc receptor antagonist approved for the treatment of acetylcholine receptor antibody positive (AChR+), Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) Class II-IV generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) patients. As a novel therapy, the clinical experiences are still lacking, especially for the use of efgartigimod in manifest and impending myasthenic crisis (IMC). We reported three AChR+, gMG patients, two with myasthenic crisis (MC) and one with IMC, treated with efgartigimod. MGFA class, MG-Activity of Daily Living score (MG-ADL), Quantitative MG score (QMG), and Muscle Research Council sum score (MRC), concentration of anti-AChR antibody, IgG, globulin, and albumin, subsets of T and B lymphocyte were evaluated or measured before, during and after efgartigimod treatment. All patients showed fast and robust response to efgartigimod with marked improvement in MGFA, MG-ADL, QMG, and MRC scores. Patient 1 did not respond effectively to IVIg but was successfully rescued by add-on efgartigimod. She extubated at 7 days after the first infusion and got rid of NIV after 14-days treatment. Patient 2 and patient 3 directly used efgartigimod when symptoms were not ameliorated by adjusting of oral drugs. Patient 2 wean from BiPAP at seven days after the first infusion. Patient 3 in IMC status, overcame the severe dysphagia at three days after the first infusion. Clinical symptoms continued to improve 1–2 weeks after discharge. Concentration of anti-AChR antibody, IgG and globulin were remarkably reduced by efgartigimod treatment. Our study supported that efgartigimod could act as a fast-acting rescue therapy for patients with MC or IMC. Larger studies from multicenter are required to provide further evidence.

A real-life experience with eculizumab and efgartigimod in generalized myasthenia gravis patients

IntroductionEculizumab, a complement active antibody, and efgartigimod, an Fc fragment that blocks neonatal Fc receptor, are both approved to treat generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) patients. The objective of this study is to describe the clinical response to both treatments in a real-life setting.MethodsWe collected baseline and follow-up clinical data using the Myasthenia Gravis-Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL), and Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG). We included 63 patients, 32 treated with eculizumab and 31 with efgartigimod. Of the efgartigimod-treated patients, 22 were anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive (AChR-Ab +) and 9 were AChR-Ab- (3 MuSK-Ab + and 6 seronegative).ResultsBoth treatments showed similar efficacy relative to the MG-ADL scale reduction (p = 0.237). Efgartigimod had a similar effect on both AChR-Ab + and AChR-Ab- (p = 0.280). Eculizumab was superior to efgartigimod relative to the QMG score reduction for the entire dataset (p = 0.003) and was more likely to achieve a clinical response at the QMG compared to efgartigimod (OR 1.373; p = 0.016). Steroid-sparing effect was higher for eculizumab than efgartigimod ( – 16.7 vs – 5.2 mg of the baseline daily dose at follow-up; p = 0.001). Mean speed of prednisone reduction was – 13.1 mg of the daily dose for each month of follow-up for eculizumab-treated patients and – 3.2 for efgartigimod (p = 0.001). We found three serious events, all not related to treatment in the investigator’s opinion. One eculizumab-treated patient experienced a severe pneumonia and died despite treatment.ConclusionsOur study provides evidence that eculizumab and efgartigimod can be used in clinical practice to reduce disability in gMG patients. Eculizumab-treated patients had a higher QMG response and steroid sparing effect. Efgartigimod may offer a more flexible schedule due to its cyclical use, no need for vaccination, and efficacy in AChR-Ab- patients.

Psychometric properties of MG-ADL items and MG-ADL score: An assessment of distributional characteristics, validity and factor structure in two large datasets

BackgroundThe Myasthenia Gravis–Activities of Daily Living scale (MG-ADL) is an 8-item outcome measure to assess symptoms and functional limitations in myasthenia gravis (MG) patients. The MG-ADL score is an equally weighted level sum score that is used as primary outcome measures in clinical trials, in clinical practice, and as an end-point in health economic evaluation. This data analysis aims to obtain detailed knowledge of measurement properties of MG-ADL items and the MG-ADL score. MethodsCross-sectional data from a real-world prospective study (MRW) were combined with longitudinal data from the ADAPT trial. Outcome measures included were MG-ADL, Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis score (QMG), MG 15-item Quality of Life (MG-QOL15r) and EQ-5D-5L. Patients were categorized by their Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) clinical classification. The following measurement properties were assessed: distributional characteristics, inter-item correlation, convergent, known groups and construct validity and internal factor structure. ResultsCorrelations of items within MG-ADL dimensions were moderate, while MG-ADL correlations between comparable MG-QOL15r and QMG items were mixed. Known groups validity for the MG-ADL score was demonstrated for MGFA class. Mean MG-ADL item level scores by MGFA class demonstrated construct validity. PCA, including all four outcome measures, resulted in a nine factor solution. DiscussionPsychometric properties of individual MG-ADL items were moderate to good. This study showed that the MG-ADL adequately captures the multidimensional heterogeneous nature of MG. This is, however, accompanied by mixed psychometric performance of the MG-ADL score, which may complicate health economic modelling.Registration: MyRealWorld-MG was registered on November 25, 2019, with registration numberNCT04176211. The ADAPT randomized clinical trial is registered atClinicalTrials.gov(NCT03669588).

The impact of patients' pre-treatment expectations on immunosuppressive treatment outcomes in myasthenia gravis: A pilot correlational study.

The impact of treatment expectations on active treatment outcomes has not been specifically investigated in neuromuscular disorders. We thus explored in myasthenia gravis (MG) the contribution of patients' pre-treatment expectations combined with an immunosuppressant drug on treatment outcomes. This pilot correlational study involved 17 patients with generalized MG, scheduled to start immunosuppressant azathioprine. At baseline, a healthcare professional administered: (i) the Stanford Expectations of Treatment Scale; (ii) a structured checklist paper form asking patients which side-effects they expected to develop after starting azathioprine, coupled with a standardized framing of statements. Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) score and daily dose of concomitant drugs were assessed by neurologists as clinical outcomes. Clinical outcomes and side-effects were re-assessed at 3 and 6 months, and clinical outcomes were monitored at 18 months. Clinically significant improvement in the QMG scores was achieved at 3 or 6 months. The level of state anxiety appeared to act as moderator of pre-treatment negative expectations (strong, positive, indicative correlation, rs = .733, p = .001). The latter were, in turn, associated with the fulfillment of side-effects that patients expected to develop with the new treatment (moderate, positive, indicative correlation, rs = .699, p = .002). No significant correlation emerged between positive and negative expectations. Our findings show a very quick clinical response and also suggest that patients' expectations and anxiety contributed to treatment outcomes, highlighting the importance of promoting safety messages and education strategies around newly introduced treatments. Future goals include evaluating a larger cohort that includes a matched control group.

Efgartigimod in refractory autoimmune myasthenia gravis.

Efgartigimod, a neonatal Fc-receptor inhibitor, has recently been approved as treatment for myasthenia gravis (MG). In this retrospective cohort study, we aimed to systematically assess short- and long-term effectiveness of efgartigimod in patients with refractory MG. Sixteen patients with refractory autoimmune acetylcholine receptor MG were treated with efgartigimod. Data were collected from January 2021 to March 2023 on Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL), Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis score (QMG), Myasthenia Gravis Composite score (MGC) and the 15-item revised version of the Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life questionnaire (MG-QoL15r). A favorable outcome was seen in 56% of patients at the last measurement. Out of 16 patients, 50% were an MG-ADL responder after the first treatment cycle. After 4 weeks, a clinically meaningful improvement compared to baseline was seen on the MG-ADL, QMG, and MGC. There was a statistically significant improvement on the MGQoL15r from baseline to week 4. The improvement was maintained until the last measurement for the MGC and the MGQoL15r. At the last visit, all patients had discontinued 4-weekly dosages, shifting to administration frequencies of 1, 2, or 3 weeks. Drug doses could be decreased for prednisolone (n = 7), azathioprine (n = 2), and intravenous immunoglobulin (n = 9). Frequency of plasma exchange was decreased in nine patients. In patients with refractory MG, efgartigimod was effective for at least half of all patients. Patients required more frequent dosing compared to the ADAPT phase 3 trial. In 80% of the patients concurrent medication could be reduced or discontinued.

Reliability and validity of cough peak flow measurements in myasthenia gravis

Decreased cough strength in myasthenia gravis (MG) leads to aspiration and increases the risk of MG crisis. The aim of this study was to clarify the reliability and validity of cough peak flow (CPF) measurements in MG. A total of 26 patients with MG who underwent CPF measurements using the peak flow meter by themselves were included. MG symptoms were evaluated by pulmonary function tests and clinical MG assessment scales before and after immune-treatments. The relationship between CPF and pulmonary function tests and MG comprehensive were assessed. The cut-off value of CPF for aspiration risk was determined and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated. The intraclass correlation coefficient was more than 0.95 for pre-and post-treatment. Positive correlations were found between CPF and almost all spirometric values as well as between the differences of pre-and post-treatment in CPF and quantitative myasthenia gravis score. The CPF for identifying the aspiration risk was used to calculate the CPF cut-off value of 205 L/min with a sensitivity of 0.77, specificity of 0.90, and AUC of 0.85. The CPF, a convenient measure by patients themselves, has a high reliability in patients with MG, and is a useful biomarker reflecting MG symptoms.

A multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 2 clinical study of telitacicept in adult patients with generalized myasthenia gravis.

This study aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of telitacicept in patients with generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) who tested positive for acetylcholine receptor antibodies or muscle-specific kinase antibodies and were receiving standard-of-care therapy. Patients meeting the eligibility criteria were randomly assigned to receive telitacicept subcutaneously once a week for 24 weeks in addition to standard-of-care treatment. The primary efficacy endpoint was the mean change in the quantitative myasthenia gravis (QMG) score from baseline to week 24. Secondary efficacy endpoints included mean change in QMG score from baseline to week 12 and gMG clinical absolute score from baseline to week 24. Additionally, safety, tolerability and pharmacodynamics were assessed. Twenty-nine of the 41 patients screened were randomly selected and enrolled. The mean (± standard deviation [SD]) reduction in QMG score from baseline to week 24 was 7.7 (± 5.34) and 9.6 (± 4.29) in the 160 mg and 240 mg groups, respectively. At week 12, mean reductions in QMG scores for these two groups were 5.8 (± 5.85) and 9.5 (± 5.03), respectively, indicating rapid clinical improvement. Safety analysis revealed no adverse events leading to discontinuation or mortalities. All patients showed consistent reductions in serum immunoglobulin (Ig) A, IgG and IgM levels throughout the study. Telitacicept demonstrated safety, good tolerability and reduced clinical severity throughout the study period. Further validation of the clinical efficacy of telitacicept in gMG will be conducted in an upcoming phase 3 clinical trial.

Taste disorders and alopecia in myasthenia gravis

BackgroundNon-motor symptoms in myasthenia gravis (MG) are rarely confirmed. Although there are some small cohort studies, a large-systemic survey has not yet been performed.MethodsWe investigated the incidence and clinical characteristics of patients with MG who had taste disorders and alopecia using data of 1710 patients with MG enrolled in the Japan MG Registry 2021.ResultsAmong them, 104 (6.1%) out of 1692 patients and 138 (8.2%) out of 1688 patients had histories of taste disorders and alopecia, respectively. Among the patients with MG, taste disorders were significantly more common in women, those with severe symptoms, refractory MG, or thymoma-associated MG, and were less common in those with ocular MG. The taste disorders often occurred after the onset of MG and often responded to MG treatments. Alopecia was more common in MG patients with a history of bulbar palsy and thymoma, and it often occurred before the onset of MG and sometimes responded to MG treatments. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed taste disturbance was associated with worst quantitative MG score and thymoma-associated MG; and alopecia was associated with thymoma-associated MG.ConclusionClinicians should be aware of the non-motor symptoms in MG, especially in patients with severe myasthenic symptoms and thymoma-associated MG.

Intravenous methylprednisolone therapy for ocular myasthenia gravis: A retrospective study

AbstractBackgroundAlthough intravenous methylprednisolone pulse (IVMP) therapy has been recommended for ocular myasthenia gravis (OMG), the evidence is limited.AimWe aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of IVMP for OMG.MethodsThe patients with OMG were chosen retrospectively from May 2010 to December 2022. The therapeutic effects between IVMP‐treated and non‐IVMP‐treated groups were determined by ∆ocular quantitative MG (QMG) score and the ∆ocular MG activities of daily living profile (MG‐ADL) score, which is the disparities of the scores between before and after 1 month of drug administration; and Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America post‐intervention status at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months.ResultsThere were 26 patients with OMG included, with the mean age of 67.2 ± 13.1 years. 13 of the 26 people with OMG received IVMP and subsequent low‐dose immunotherapies. The ∆ocular QMG and ∆ocular MG‐ADL scores were significantly higher in the IVMP group of 3 (1.5, 4) and 3 (2, 4.5) than in the non‐IVMP group of 1.5 (0, 3) and 1 (0, 2), p = 0.038 and p = 0.0027, respectively. The rates of minimal manifestation or better status in post‐intervention status at 1 and 12 months were also considerably higher in the IVMP group of 77% and 92% compared with the non‐IVMP group of 0% and 23%, p = 0.0001 and 0.001. There were no serious side effects discovered.ConclusionIVMP induction therapy can quickly and safely improve symptoms of OMG, and subsequent low‐dose immunotherapy can keep symptoms at bay for 12 months.

Constructing and Validating a Nomogram Model for Short-Term Prognosis of Patients with AChR-Ab+ GMG.

This study aimed to establish and validate a nomogram prognostic model for predicting short-term efficacy of acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive (AChR-Ab+) generalized myasthenia gravis (GMG). A retrospective observational study was conducted at the First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, enrolling patients diagnosed with AChR-Ab+ GMG from May 2020 to September 2022. The primary outcome was the change in the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) post-intervention status after 6months of standard treatment. Predictive factors were identified through univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses, with significant factors incorporated into the nomogram. The bootstrap test was used for internal validation of the nomogram model. Model performance was assessed using calibration curves, receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis, and decision curve analysis (DCA). A total of 90 patients were enrolled, of whom 30 achieved unchanged or worse status after 6months of standard therapy. Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that quantitative myasthenia gravis score, gender, body mass index, course of disease, hemoglobin levels, and white blood cell counts were six potential predictors. These factors were used for multivariate logistic regression analysis, and a nomogram was constructed. The calibration curve showed that the predicted value was in good agreement with the actual value (p = 0.707), and the area under the curve value (0.792, 95% CI 0.686-0.899) indicated good discrimination ability. DCA suggests that this model has potential clinical application value. The constructed nomogram, based on key patient indicators, shows promise as a clinically useful tool for predicting the short-term efficacy of treatment of AChR-Ab+ GMG. Validation in larger, multicenter cohorts is needed to further substantiate its applicability.

Clinicopathological predictors of postoperative long-term myasthenic status in resected thymoma with myasthenia gravis.

Surgical patients with thymoma and myasthenia gravis (MG) must have their MG status and oncological outcomes critically monitored. We aimed to identify clinicopathological predictors of the postoperative MG status. We conducted a retrospective review of 40 consecutive surgical patients with MG-related thymomas between 2002 and 2020. The quantitative myasthenia gravis score (QMGS) and Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America post-intervention status (MGFA-PIS) were used to evaluate postoperative MG status. All patients underwent extended total thymectomy. The most common WHO type was type B2 (32%), while 65% of patients had type B1-B3 and 35% had type A-AB thymomas. Eleven patients (28%) achieved controlled MG status in MGFA-PIS 6months after surgery. This controlled status was observed more frequently in type A-AB than in B1-B3 (57% vs. 12%, p = 0.007). In a multivariate analysis, WHO type (A-AB or B1-B3) was an independent predictor of worsening episodes of MG based on the QMGS (Type B1-B3, hazard ratio: 3.23, 95% confidence interval: 1.12-9.25). At the last follow-up, 23 patients (58%) achieved controlled MG status. The 5-year overall survival rate of all patients was 93.7%. The WHO type of thymoma is an informative predictor of postoperative MG status in patients with MG-related thymoma.

Efficacy of ravulizumab in patients with generalized myasthenia gravis by time from diagnosis: A post hoc subgroup analysis of the CHAMPION MG study.

The CHAMPION MG study demonstrated that ravulizumab significantly improved Myasthenia Gravis-Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) and Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) total scores versus placebo in adults with acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive generalized myasthenia gravis (AChR+ gMG). This post hoc analysis aimed to assess these outcomes by time from MG diagnosis. Changes from baseline to week 26 in MG-ADL and QMG total scores were analyzed by time from MG diagnosis to study entry (≤2 vs. >2 years). Within each subgroup, least-squares (LS) mean changes for ravulizumab and placebo were compared using mixed models for repeated measures. In ravulizumab-treated patients, differences in LS mean (standard error of the mean) changes from baseline to week 26 were not statistically significant in the ≤2-years subgroup versus the >2-years subgroup for MG-ADL (-4.3 [0.70] vs. -2.9 [0.37]; p = .0511) or QMG (-4.3 [0.94] vs. -2.5 [0.50]; p = .0822) scores. No clear trends were observed in the placebo group. LS mean changes from baseline were significantly greater for ravulizumab versus placebo in both the ≤2 and >2 years from diagnosis subgroups for MG-ADL and QMG scores (all p < .05). The difference in treatment effect between the ≤2-years and >2-years subgroups was not statistically significant. No clinically meaningful between-subgroup differences in treatment-emergent adverse events were observed in ravulizumab-treated patients. Ravulizumab treatment improved clinical outcomes for patients with AChR+ gMG regardless of time from diagnosis. A numerical trend was observed favoring greater treatment effect with earlier versus later treatment after diagnosis. Further studies are required for confirmation.

The Efficacy and Safety of Different Targeted Drugs for the Treatment of Generalized Myasthenia Gravis: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-analysis.

The treatment of generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) has been transformed by the development and approval of new targeted therapies. This analysis aimed to rank and compare the new therapies for gMG using efficacy and safety data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and ClinicalTrials.gov (up to November 2022) for RCTs of targeted drugs for gMG. We used a Bayesian random-effects network meta-analysis (NMA) model and a Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) model for statistical analysis. The primary outcome was the change in quantitative myasthenia gravis score (QMGS) from baseline, while the secondary outcome was the risk ratio (RR) of adverse events (AEs) during treatment. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was used to rank these targeted drugs, with higher SUCRA values indicating better efficacy or lower likelihood of AEs. In total, 13 studies (872 subjects) were included in this analysis evaluating 10 targeted drugs (batoclimab, belimumab, CFZ533, eculizumab, efgartigimod, nipocalimab, rituximab, ravulizumab, rozanolixizumab, and zilucoplan). With regards to the primary outcome, batoclimab [standardized mean difference (SMD), - 1.61; 95% credible interval (CrI), - 2.78, - 0.43] significantly reduced QMGS in patients with gMG when compared with placebo and was ranked as the most efficacious drug. Ranked second and third were eculizumab (SMD, - 0.67; 95% CrI, 1.43, 0.01) and zilucoplan (SMD, - 0.54; 95% CrI, - 1.56, 0.46), respectively. Nipoclimab (SMD, - 0.02; 95% CrI, - 1.04, 1.00) had the worst efficacy and ranked last among all targeted drugs. In our study, except for batoclimab, there was no statistically significant difference in the reduction of patient QMGS for the remaining targeted agents compared with placebo. With regards to the secondary outcomes, only batoclimab (RR, 0.19; 95% CrI, 0, 0.97) led to a significant reduction in the incidence of AEs when compared with the placebo. Belimumab (RR, 0.85; 95% CrI, 0.57, 1.19), CFZ533 (RR, 0.95; 95% CrI, 0.72, 1.25), eculizumab (RR, 0.99; 95% CrI, 0.85, 1.21), and efgartigimod (RR, 0.93; 95% CrI, 0.76, 1.15) also led to a lower incidence of AEs, although these effects were not significantly different from the placebo. Batoclimab had the best efficacy and safety for the treatment of gMG and was ranked first out of the 10 targeted drugs included in this study. Eculizumab was ranked second, and nipocalimab had the worst efficacy. With the exception of batoclimab,the incidence of AEs for the remaining drugs was not statistically significantly different from placebo. We note, however, that wide CrIs reflect the uncertainty in this analysis owing to the small number of available studies and low numbers of study participants; moreover, batoclimab had the widest CrI of all drugs in this analysis. More well-designed studies with long-term follow-up are needed to further evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of these drugs in the future.