Quality-switched Lasers Research Articles

Treatment of Iron-Induced Cutaneous Hyperpigmentation With Energy-Based Devices.

Iatrogenic cutaneous siderosis is a well-recognized dermatologic complication after parenteral iron infusion. The condition manifests as discrete, hyperpigmented patches near the site of injection. Most cases do not resolve spontaneously, leading to significant aesthetic and psychological distress to patients. A recent case of iatrogenic cutaneous siderosis at our institution prompted a systematic review of the efficacy of energy-based devices previously reported in the treatment of this condition. PubMed and Cochrane databases were searched for all peer-reviewed articles published using the following search terms: "iron OR heme OR hemosiderosis OR siderosis" and "hyperpigmentation OR staining OR tattoo." Articles reporting on energy-based devices in the treatment of iron-induced hyperpigmentation were included. A total of seven articles and 54 total patients were included in this review. All patients, including the patient treated at our institution, were female, with an average age of 44 years. Hyperpigmentation was most commonly associated with intravenous iron infusion (48/54, 89%), on the arm or forearm (44/54, 81%), and used for the treatment of underlying iron deficiency anemia (54/54, 100%). The application of six different nanosecond or picosecond quality-switched laser systems was reported in the treatment of cutaneous siderosis, with wavelengths ranging from 532 to 1064 nm. Spot sizes varied between 2 and 7 mm, with energy fluences spanning 0.5-40 J/cm2 depending on both the device and spot size. Outcomes were measured after an average of 5.4 laser treatments and 10.4 months, with over half of all reported patients experiencing complete clearance (27/50, 54%). Our patient received treatment inthree test areas withpicosecond alexandrite 785 nm, nanosecond Nd:YAG 532 nm, and picosecond Nd:YAG 532 nm devices. The nanosecond Nd:YAG 532 nm treated area demonstrated the greatest improvement,and the entire arm was subsequently treated with this device. Despite the often intractable nature of iatrogenic cutaneous siderosis, laser surgery is a reasonable and safe treatment modality for patients seeking cosmetic improvement of this dyschromia. Dermatologists should be aware of this entity and the efficacy of the energy-based devices currently in our armamentarium. A combination approach may need to be utilized with different wavelengths and pulsed widths to target iron pigment in both dermal and subcutaneous layers.

Efficacy of 785-nm Picosecond Titanium Sapphire Laser for Treatment of Brown Nevus of Ota Lesions in FST II-V: A Retrospective Analysis.

Nevus of Ota (NOTA) is a dermal melanocytosis acquired in early childhood or pregnancy. Given their color variability, NOTA often require a combination of wavelengths for successful treatment. Quality-switched lasers have consistently shown efficacy in targeting dermal pigment, while picosecond lasers (PSLs) are an emerging technology for pigmentary disorders. To further elucidate its efficacy, the authors conducted a retrospective review of 17 patients with NOTA treated with a 785-nm PSL for brown NOTA lesions between 2021 and 2023. The primary end point analyzed clinical improvement based on before and after photography reviewed by 3 board-certified dermatologists using a five-point visual analog scale. Seventeen patients of Fitzpatrick skin types (FSTs) II to V, ranging from ages 14 to 38 years, were included in this study. Patients were treated for an average of 3.2 sessions in 2 to 3-month intervals. Visual analog scale scores demonstrated a mean clearance of 51% to 75%. No pigmentary alterations were noted. Because NOTA is common in higher FSTs, the authors believe that the 785-nm PSL is an excellent treatment option for brown NOTA in these skin types. This study highlights the need for further investigation to determine optimal treatment parameters for the color-based laser treatment approach for NOTA.

Lasers for the treatment of eyebrow microblading and cosmetic tattoo pigment: a review of the literature.

We aim to discuss the use of laser for the treatment of eyebrow microblading and cosmetic tattoo complications through a review of the literature. Our research question is whether quality-switched or picosecond laser is superior for the removal of eyebrow tattoos. This structured review was conducted using a PubMed search using the search terms "laser tattoo removal" AND "cosmetic tattoo" AND "eyebrow" with the article type filtered to "case reports," "clinical trial," and "randomized controlled trial" ranging from dates 1994-2023. All case reports or series evaluating the effect of laser on eyebrow cosmetic tattooing pigment were included. We summarize the results of 11 studies evaluating the use of laser for cosmetic tattoo removal, with 129 patients treated specifically for eyebrow pigment. Most studies (8/11) report Fitzpatrick skin type or race. Seven studies utilize quality-switched (QS) neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG), alexandrite or ruby, three used picosecond (PS) Nd:YAG or alexandrite, and three used carbon dioxide (CO2) laser. We report laser energy, spot size, and pulse duration, as well as treatment outcomes and adverse events. Historically, methods of pigment removal included dermabrasion, cryosurgery, electrosurgery, radiofrequency, infrared light, intense pulsed light, and surgical excision; however, these methods often led to poor cosmetic outcomes including scarring and further dyspigmentation. QS laser treatments provided superior cosmetic outcomes and thus were considered the gold standard treatment option for pigment removal. However, the advent of PS lasers has challenged this given their increased selectivity, lower fluence requirements, and reduction in surrounding thermal damage. Our review demonstrates that PS Nd:YAG is quicker and more effective that QS Nd:YAG in the treatment of eyebrow tattoos. Additionally, the paradoxical darkening seen with QS lasers is less common with PS lasers. We also demonstrate that CO2 laser may be a helpful adjunct to QS or PS laser. This review focuses on Fitzpatrick skin type and race, providing a unique perspective on the use of laser treatment in skin of color, which often poses an additional treatment challenge.

Effect of quality-switched laser exposure in patients with history of edible gold consumption.

Injectable gold is known to deposit in the dermis for life, and such patients are at risk of developing chrysiasis post-laser exposure. It is unknown if patients with history of edible gold consumption would develop a similar reaction after quality-switched laser exposure. Our aim is to assess if patients with history of edible gold consumption develop chrysiasis after quality-switched laser exposure. This is a proof of concept pilot study conducted between September 2017 and September 2018 at two dermatology clinics in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Adult patients who have history of edible gold consumption were recruited to receive a spot test with different quality-switched lasers in a hidden, non-sun-exposed skin site. The test area was photographed before, immediately after, and 10min after laser exposure. The test area was examined by two independent investigators for the development of chrysiasis. A total of 10 patients (five male and five female) were enrolled. The mean age was 31.7years. Forty percent of subjects consumed edible gold more than once, and the duration of last intake ranged from 3weeks to 3months. Chocolate was the main source of edible gold. All participants had no chrysiasis reaction post-quality-switched laser exposure. Contrary to our hypothesis, all participants with history of short-term edible gold consumption did not develop chrysiasis after quality-switched laser exposure. Further controlled studies including more patients with longer duration and higher frequency of edible gold consumption are needed.

Quality-switched laser (Q-switched): review of their variations and main clinical applicabilities

Quality-switched laser (Q-switched): review of their variations and main clinical applicabilities

Lasers for nevi: a review.

A nevus is described as a benign, often pigmented, skin growth that can be congenital or acquired. Different types of nevi are located at different depths within the skin. Traditional treatments for nevi include topical treatments, dermabrasion, and excision, which are generally ineffective, invasive, and often result in scars and dyspigmentation. Lately, laser therapy has been used as an alternative. Based on the theory of selective photothermolysis, melanin can be specifically targeted, minimizing adverse effects and increasing effectiveness of laser treatments. Several types of lasers and lights have been studied for this purpose without a concise agreement as to which is the best. In general, quality-switched lasers are preferred for the treatment of pigmented lesions. However, there is controversy about this therapy because certain nevi may have malignant potential. This article serves as a comprehensive review of available laser treatments for nevi and discusses the appropriate measures that should be taken before and after laser therapy. Based on the reviewed literature, laser treatment has generally been proven to be a safe and effective therapy for nevi with minimal side effects.

Quality-switched laser tattoo removal.

Quality-switched (Q-switched) laser is the most effective method to remove tattoos with minimal adverse outcomes. This article reviews the types of tattoos commonly treated with Q-switched lasers, mechanisms behind the procedure, technologies used, patient considerations and contraindications, addressing patient expectations, treatment procedures, possible adverse reactions, and future techniques and technology.

New Tattoo Approaches in Dermatology

Tattoos have fascinated mankind for centuries. Although these body marks were once considered to be permanent, technical and scientific progress in recent years has made it possible to remove tattoos by various treatment modalities. Contemporary technology involves the use of nonablative quality-switched lasers, which are considered to be the gold-standard treatment option for the removal of unwanted tattoo ink. Current research in the field of tattoo removal is focused on faster lasers and more effective targeting of tattoo pigment particles including picosecond laser devices, multi-pass treatments, dermal scatter reduction, application of imiquimod, and the use of microencapsulated tattoo ink.

Treatment of Cosmetic Tattoos Using Carbon Dioxide Ablative Fractional Resurfacing in an Animal Model: A Novel Method Confirmed Histopathologically

Treating cosmetic tattoos using quality-switched lasers is difficult. We used carbon dioxide ablative fractional resurfacing (CO2 AFR) to remove cosmetic tattoos and examined the pathophysiologic mechanisms involved in this technique in an animal model. Twelve rats were tattooed on their backs with white and flesh-colored pigments. Half of each tattoo was treated with CO2 AFR (5 sessions at 1-month intervals), and the other half was the untreated control. An independent observer reviewed photographic documentation of clinical response. Serial skin samples obtained at baseline and at various times after laser treatment were evaluated using histologic and immunohistochemical methods. Four rats had excellent responses to laser treatment and eight had good responses. White and flesh-colored tattoos had similar clearance rates and tissue reactions. Histologic analysis showed immediate ablation of tattoo pigments in the microscopic ablation zones. Tattoo pigments in the microscopic coagulation zones migrated to the epidermis and became part of the microscopic exudative necrotic debris appearing on day 2 that was exfoliated after 5days. Increased fibronectin expression around the microscopic treatment zones during the extrusion of tattoo pigments indicated that wound healing facilitates this action. CO2 AFR successfully removes cosmetic tattoos.

Superficial Frostbite Masquerading as Ecchymosis from Improper Cryotherapy Use After Q-Switched Laser Tattoo Treatment

With the development of quality-switched (QS) laser tattoo removal treatment, along with the increasing popularity of tattooing, the number of requests for tattoo removal has increased significantly. Tattoo removal using QS lasers is well established in the medical literature as safe and effective. Cryotherapy using ice packs is widely accepted as a common means by which to diminish postprocedural discomfort and edema from a large variety of medical procedures, including QS laser tattoo removal. In the following case report and discussion, the authors describe what they believe are the first cases of superficial frostbite from improper use of ice packs after laser tattoo removal treatment using QS lasers.

Comparative study of treatment efficacy and the incidence of post‐inflammatory hyperpigmentation with different degrees of irradiation using two different quality‐switched lasers for removing solar lentigines on Asian skin

Quality-switched (QS) lasers are well-known effective treatment for removing solar lentigines. However, the high incidence of post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH) raises concern in darker skin types. This is the first study comparing efficacies and incidences of PIH in Asian skin with different degrees of irradiation between two QS lasers. In total, 355 solar lentigines in 193 cases, skin types III-V, were randomly divided into four groups. All cases received single laser treatment. Clinical results were evaluated after 4 weeks. Groups 1 and 3 were treated 'aggressively' with endpoints of very obvious immediate whitening (IW) of the lesion. Groups 2 and 4 were treated 'mildly' with endpoints of slight IW of the lesion. Groups 1 and 2 were irradiated with the QS ruby, and groups 3 and 4 with the QS frequency doubled Nd:YAG laser. There were no statistically significant differences in degrees of clearance among the four groups. However, PIH incidences were very different: 33.33%, 7.47%, 23.18% and 8.47% in groups 1, 2, 3 and 4 respectively. The difference between aggressively and mildly irradiated groups (1 and 3 vs. 2 and 4) was statistically significant (P < 0.001). However, there was no statistical difference between the two aggressively or the two mildly irradiated groups. There were no significant differences between skin types. Aggressive irradiation using QS lasers resulted in a high PIH incidence, while having no advantage in efficacy. For darker skin types, mild irradiation reduces the PIH risk with no disadvantage in efficacy.

Laser Tattoo Removal: A Review

Tattoos have played an important role in human culture for thousands of years, and they remain popular today. The development of quality-switched (QS) lasers has revolutionized the removal of unwanted tattoos. To thoroughly review the literature on laser tattoo removal pertaining to its history, its theoretical basis, the various devices used, potential adverse effects, and future developments. An extensive literature review of publications related to tattoo removal was conducted. Reports exist demonstrating the efficacy of laser removal of different tattoo types, including professional, amateur, traumatic, cosmetic, and medical. The literature supports the use of different QS lasers for removal of tattoos. Some colors have a more-complete response using particular wavelengths. QS lasers can effectively and safely remove different types of unwanted tattoos.

Tattoo removal by non‐professionals – medical and forensic considerations

Tattoos are common phenomena in the western world and the demand for their removal has become widespread in the recent years. The introduction of quality-switched lasers has provided an effective removal method that is increasingly being exploited by tattoo studios themselves. Dermatologists, however, are frequently confronted with complications and side effects of tattoo removals that were performed by non-professionals. The objective of this study is to assess potential risks and pitfalls of laser tattoo removal when performed by medical laymen. The methods followed are systematic and evidence-based review of the literature. Four major problem areas were identified: rare but potentially severe allergic or toxic effects of decomposition products of the tattoo pigments; bodily harm caused by out-of-specification usage of the laser devices; malignant disease that is obscured within the area of a tattoo and requires meticulous dermatological diagnosis; and insufficient pre-operative consultation of patients about the risks, side effects and realistic expectations on the therapeutic outcome. We came to a conclusion that tattoo laser removal by medical laymen is unacceptable from the point of view of patient safety and the laws need to ban this practice swiftly.