Protein Model Quality Research Articles

Designing and evaluating the MULTICOM protein local and global model quality prediction methods in the CASP10 experiment.

BackgroundProtein model quality assessment is an essential component of generating and using protein structural models. During the Tenth Critical Assessment of Techniques for Protein Structure Prediction (CASP10), we developed and tested four automated methods (MULTICOM-REFINE, MULTICOM-CLUSTER, MULTICOM-NOVEL, and MULTICOM-CONSTRUCT) that predicted both local and global quality of protein structural models.ResultsMULTICOM-REFINE was a clustering approach that used the average pairwise structural similarity between models to measure the global quality and the average Euclidean distance between a model and several top ranked models to measure the local quality. MULTICOM-CLUSTER and MULTICOM-NOVEL were two new support vector machine-based methods of predicting both the local and global quality of a single protein model. MULTICOM-CONSTRUCT was a new weighted pairwise model comparison (clustering) method that used the weighted average similarity between models in a pool to measure the global model quality. Our experiments showed that the pairwise model assessment methods worked better when a large portion of models in the pool were of good quality, whereas single-model quality assessment methods performed better on some hard targets when only a small portion of models in the pool were of reasonable quality.ConclusionsSince digging out a few good models from a large pool of low-quality models is a major challenge in protein structure prediction, single model quality assessment methods appear to be poised to make important contributions to protein structure modeling. The other interesting finding was that single-model quality assessment scores could be used to weight the models by the consensus pairwise model comparison method to improve its accuracy.

Protein Model Quality Assessment Prediction by using a Residue Specific Statistical Potential

A residue specific approach is introduced for enhancing the accuracy of knowledge-based statistical potentials for quality assessment of protein models. The proposed method relies on an assumption that common substructure motifs among different protein folds can still share similar patterns of interactions with neighboring residues. Instead of using the classic approach, in which a set of non-homologous whole-chain structures are used to derive a potential, we created a potential that was composed of independent sub-potentials; each of them was specific to a certain residue in the target sequence. To achieve that, the target sequence was split into short linear segments, then every segment was threaded through PDB to find proteins that share sequence similarity with this segment. Then, after removal the hits that were homologous to the target sequence, the remaining proteins were used to derive a statistical sub-potential for the residue that was in the center of a certain segment that had been threaded through PDB. This procedure was performed for every residue in the target protein. We applied this methodology to create a residue-specific variant of the DFIRE statistical potential. For CASP9 single-domain targets, the average Pearson's correlation coefficient per target between the pseudo-energy predicted by the residue-specific DIFIRE potential and the GDT_TS score was 0.656. The classic DFIRE potential achieved the correlation coefficient of 0.561. We believe that, for the current size (which is still growing) of the PDB database, this methodology can be successfully applied to increase the accuracy of other state-of-the-art statistical potentials.

Predicting Protein Model Quality from Sequence Alignments by Support Vector Machines.

Assessing the quality of a protein structure model is essential for protein structure prediction. Here, we developed a Support Vector Machine (SVM) method to predict the quality score (GDT-TS score) of a protein structure model from the features extracted from the sequence alignment used to generate the model. We developed a Support Vector Machine (SVM) model quality assessment method, taking either a query-single-template pairwise alignment or a query-multitemplate alignment as input. For the pairwise alignment scheme, the input features fed into the SVM predictor include the normalized e-value of the given alignment, the percentage of identical residue pairs in the alignment, the percentage of residues of the query aligned with those of the template, and the sum of the BLOSUM scores of all aligned residues divided by the length of the aligned positions. Similarly, for the multiple-alignment scheme, the input features include the percentage of the residues of the target sequence aligned with those in one or more templates, the percentage of aligned residues of the target sequence that are the same as that of any one template, the average BLOSUM score of aligned residues and the average Gonnet160 score of aligned residues. A SVM regression predictor was trained on the training data to predict the GDT-TS scores of the models from the input features. The Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and the Absolute Mean Error (ABS) between predicted and real GDT-TS scores were calculated to evaluate the performance. A five-fold cross validation was applied to select the best parameter values based on the average RMSE and ABS on the five folds. The RMSE and ABS of the optimized SVM predictor on the testing data were close to 0.1. The good performance of the SVM and sequence alignment based predictor indicates that integrating sequence alignment features with a SVM is effective for protein model quality assessment.

A study and benchmark of DNcon: a method for protein residue-residue contact prediction using deep networks

BackgroundIn recent years, the use and importance of predicted protein residue-residue contacts has grown considerably with demonstrated applications such as drug design, protein tertiary structure prediction and model quality assessment. Nevertheless, reported accuracies in the range of 25-35% stubbornly remain the norm for sequence based, long range contact predictions on hard targets. This is in spite of a prolonged effort on behalf of the community to improve the performance of residue-residue contact prediction. A thorough study of the quality of current residue-residue contact predictions and the evaluation metrics used as well as an analysis of current methods is needed to stimulate further advancement in contact prediction and its application. Such a study will better explain the quality and nature of residue-residue contact predictions generated by current methods and as a result lead to better use of this contact information.ResultsWe evaluated several sequence based residue-residue contact predictors that participated in the tenth Critical Assessment of protein Structure Prediction (CASP) experiment. The evaluation was performed using standard assessment techniques such as those used by the official CASP assessors as well as two novel evaluation metrics (i.e., cluster accuracy and cluster count). An in-depth analysis revealed that while most residue-residue contact predictions generated are not accurate at the residue level, there is quite a strong contact signal present when allowing for less than residue level precision. Our residue-residue contact predictor, DNcon, performed particularly well achieving an accuracy of 66% for the top L/10 long range contacts when evaluated in a neighbourhood of size 2. The coverage of residue-residue contact areas was also greater with DNcon when compared to other methods. We also provide an analysis of DNcon with respect to its underlying architecture and features used for classification.ConclusionsOur novel evaluation metrics demonstrate that current residue-residue contact predictions do contain a strong contact signal and are of better quality than standard evaluation metrics indicate. Our method, DNcon, is a robust, state-of-the-art residue-residue sequence based contact predictor and excelled under a number of evaluation schemes. It is available as a web service at http://iris.rnet.missouri.edu/dncon/.

NEW MDS AND CLUSTERING BASED ALGORITHMS FOR PROTEIN MODEL QUALITY ASSESSMENT AND SELECTION

In protein tertiary structure prediction, assessing the quality of predicted models is an essential task. Over the past years, many methods have been proposed for the protein model quality assessment (QA) and selection problem. Despite significant advances, the discerning power of current methods is still unsatisfactory. In this paper, we propose two new algorithms, CC-Select and MDS-QA, based on multidimensional scaling and k-means clustering. For the model selection problem, CC-Select combines consensus with clustering techniques to select the best models from a given pool. Given a set of predicted models, CC-Select first calculates a consensus score for each structure based on its average pairwise structural similarity to other models. Then, similar structures are grouped into clusters using multidimensional scaling and clustering algorithms. In each cluster, the one with the highest consensus score is selected as a candidate model. For the QA problem, MDS-QA combines single-model scoring functions with consensus to determine more accurate assessment score for every model in a given pool. Using extensive benchmark sets of a large collection of predicted models, we compare the two algorithms with existing state-of-the-art quality assessment methods and show significant improvement.

The ModFOLD4 server for the quality assessment of 3D protein models

Once you have generated a 3D model of a protein, how do you know whether it bears any resemblance to the actual structure? To determine the usefulness of 3D models of proteins, they must be assessed in terms of their quality by methods that predict their similarity to the native structure. The ModFOLD4 server is the latest version of our leading independent server for the estimation of both the global and local (per-residue) quality of 3D protein models. The server produces both machine readable and graphical output, providing users with intuitive visual reports on the quality of predicted protein tertiary structures. The ModFOLD4 server is freely available to all at: http://www.reading.ac.uk/bioinf/ModFOLD/.

MQAPmulti2 and MQAPsingle2:Toward the Estimation of Model Quality When Not Only Many Models are Available

We propose two new methods for the estimation of the quality of protein models. MQAPmulti2 performs well when scoring hundreds of alternative models, but also it can be applied when only a few models (∼20) are available. We optimized MQAPmulti (developed earlier by Pawlowski and Bujnicki) to perform better when less than hundreds models are available.The MQAPmulti2 prediction is based on three components: 1) TrueMQAP_component - scoring is based on statistical and agreement potentials; 2) CLUST_component, which clusters models on the base of GDT_TS and SQ_score (our modification of Q-score that works by estimating the structural relatedness between two protein structures based on comparison of intramolecular distances); 3) CORR_component, a correlation based method that combines predictions of the TrueMQAP_componet with pair-wise models comparisons measured by GDT_TS and SQ_score. Finally, all of these components are used to predict the global quality of a model. To do so, on the base of the number of input models, the program chooses one of 3 regression models that describe the relationship between initial parameters and the global quality. These three regression models were created for following numbers of input models: 20, 150, 300 or more.MQAPsingle2, that is a variant of the MQAPmulti2 program, that operates as a quasi-single model MQAP. This method applies MQAPmulti2 algorithm, however a model to be scored is not compared to the input models, but to models generated by GeneSilico fold prediction metaserver.MQAPmulti2 was trained and tested for CASP7th, 8th and 9th models dataset by using 10-fold cross validation procedure. The value of Pearson's correlation coefficient between MQAPmulti2 global score and the GDT_TS is 0.712, 0.819 and 0.917 for cases of 20, 150 and 300 or more available input models, respectively.

Quality assessment of protein model-structures based on structural and functional similarities

BackgroundExperimental determination of protein 3D structures is expensive, time consuming and sometimes impossible. A gap between number of protein structures deposited in the World Wide Protein Data Bank and the number of sequenced proteins constantly broadens. Computational modeling is deemed to be one of the ways to deal with the problem. Although protein 3D structure prediction is a difficult task, many tools are available. These tools can model it from a sequence or partial structural information, e.g. contact maps. Consequently, biologists have the ability to generate automatically a putative 3D structure model of any protein. However, the main issue becomes evaluation of the model quality, which is one of the most important challenges of structural biology.ResultsGOBA - Gene Ontology-Based Assessment is a novel Protein Model Quality Assessment Program. It estimates the compatibility between a model-structure and its expected function. GOBA is based on the assumption that a high quality model is expected to be structurally similar to proteins functionally similar to the prediction target. Whereas DALI is used to measure structure similarity, protein functional similarity is quantified using standardized and hierarchical description of proteins provided by Gene Ontology combined with Wang's algorithm for calculating semantic similarity. Two approaches are proposed to express the quality of protein model-structures. One is a single model quality assessment method, the other is its modification, which provides a relative measure of model quality. Exhaustive evaluation is performed on data sets of model-structures submitted to the CASP8 and CASP9 contests.ConclusionsThe validation shows that the method is able to discriminate between good and bad model-structures. The best of tested GOBA scores achieved 0.74 and 0.8 as a mean Pearson correlation to the observed quality of models in our CASP8 and CASP9-based validation sets. GOBA also obtained the best result for two targets of CASP8, and one of CASP9, compared to the contest participants. Consequently, GOBA offers a novel single model quality assessment program that addresses the practical needs of biologists. In conjunction with other Model Quality Assessment Programs (MQAPs), it would prove useful for the evaluation of single protein models.

Improved model quality assessment using ProQ2

BackgroundEmploying methods to assess the quality of modeled protein structures is now standard practice in bioinformatics. In a broad sense, the techniques can be divided into methods relying on consensus prediction on the one hand, and single-model methods on the other. Consensus methods frequently perform very well when there is a clear consensus, but this is not always the case. In particular, they frequently fail in selecting the best possible model in the hard cases (lacking consensus) or in the easy cases where models are very similar. In contrast, single-model methods do not suffer from these drawbacks and could potentially be applied on any protein of interest to assess quality or as a scoring function for sampling-based refinement.ResultsHere, we present a new single-model method, ProQ2, based on ideas from its predecessor, ProQ. ProQ2 is a model quality assessment algorithm that uses support vector machines to predict local as well as global quality of protein models. Improved performance is obtained by combining previously used features with updated structural and predicted features. The most important contribution can be attributed to the use of profile weighting of the residue specific features and the use features averaged over the whole model even though the prediction is still local.ConclusionsProQ2 is significantly better than its predecessors at detecting high quality models, improving the sum of Z-scores for the selected first-ranked models by 20% and 32% compared to the second-best single-model method in CASP8 and CASP9, respectively. The absolute quality assessment of the models at both local and global level is also improved. The Pearson’s correlation between the correct and local predicted score is improved from 0.59 to 0.70 on CASP8 and from 0.62 to 0.68 on CASP9; for global score to the correct GDT_TS from 0.75 to 0.80 and from 0.77 to 0.80 again compared to the second-best single methods in CASP8 and CASP9, respectively. ProQ2 is available at http://proq2.wallnerlab.org.

The MULTICOM toolbox for protein structure prediction

BackgroundAs genome sequencing is becoming routine in biomedical research, the total number of protein sequences is increasing exponentially, recently reaching over 108 million. However, only a tiny portion of these proteins (i.e. ~75,000 or < 0.07%) have solved tertiary structures determined by experimental techniques. The gap between protein sequence and structure continues to enlarge rapidly as the throughput of genome sequencing techniques is much higher than that of protein structure determination techniques. Computational software tools for predicting protein structure and structural features from protein sequences are crucial to make use of this vast repository of protein resources.ResultsTo meet the need, we have developed a comprehensive MULTICOM toolbox consisting of a set of protein structure and structural feature prediction tools. These tools include secondary structure prediction, solvent accessibility prediction, disorder region prediction, domain boundary prediction, contact map prediction, disulfide bond prediction, beta-sheet topology prediction, fold recognition, multiple template combination and alignment, template-based tertiary structure modeling, protein model quality assessment, and mutation stability prediction.ConclusionsThese tools have been rigorously tested by many users in the last several years and/or during the last three rounds of the Critical Assessment of Techniques for Protein Structure Prediction (CASP7-9) from 2006 to 2010, achieving state-of-the-art or near performance. In order to facilitate bioinformatics research and technological development in the field, we have made the MULTICOM toolbox freely available as web services and/or software packages for academic use and scientific research. It is available at http://sysbio.rnet.missouri.edu/multicom_toolbox/.

United3D: A Protein Model Quality Assessment Program That Uses Two Consensus Based Methods

In protein structure prediction, such as template-based modeling and free modeling (ab initio modeling), the step that assesses the quality of protein models is very important. We have developed a model quality assessment (QA) program United3D that uses an optimized clustering method and a simple Cα atom contact-based potential. United3D automatically estimates the quality scores (Qscore) of predicted protein models that are highly correlated with the actual quality (GDT_TS). The performance of United3D was tested in the ninth Critical Assessment of protein Structure Prediction (CASP9) experiment. In CASP9, United3D showed the lowest average loss of GDT_TS (5.3) among the QA methods participated in CASP9. This result indicates that the performance of United3D to identify the high quality models from the models predicted by CASP9 servers on 116 targets was best among the QA methods that were tested in CASP9. United3D also produced high average Pearson correlation coefficients (0.93) and acceptable Kendall rank correlation coefficients (0.68) between the Qscore and GDT_TS. This performance was competitive with the other top ranked QA methods that were tested in CASP9. These results indicate that United3D is a useful tool for selecting high quality models from many candidate model structures provided by various modeling methods. United3D will improve the accuracy of protein structure prediction.

An iterative self‐refining and self‐evaluating approach for protein model quality estimation

Evaluating or predicting the quality of protein models (i.e., predicted protein tertiary structures) without knowing their native structures is important for selecting and appropriately using protein models. We describe an iterative approach that improves the performances of protein Model Quality Assurance Programs (MQAPs). Given the initial quality scores of a list of models assigned by a MQAP, the method iteratively refines the scores until the ranking of the models does not change. We applied the method to the model quality assessment data generated by 30 MQAPs during the Eighth Critical Assessment of Techniques for Protein Structure Prediction. To various degrees, our method increased the average correlation between predicted and real quality scores of 25 out of 30 MQAPs and reduced the average loss (i.e., the difference between the top ranked model and the best model) for 28 MQAPs. Particularly, for MQAPs with low average correlations (<0.4), the correlation can be increased by several times. Similar experiments conducted on the CASP9 MQAPs also demonstrated the effectiveness of the method. Our method is a hybrid method that combines the original method of a MQAP and the pair-wise comparison clustering method. It can achieve a high accuracy similar to a full pair-wise clustering method, but with much less computation time when evaluating hundreds of models. Furthermore, without knowing native structures, the iterative refining method can evaluate the performance of a MQAP by analyzing its model quality predictions.

PSICOV: precise structural contact prediction using sparse inverse covariance estimation on large multiple sequence alignments

The accurate prediction of residue-residue contacts, critical for maintaining the native fold of a protein, remains an open problem in the field of structural bioinformatics. Interest in this long-standing problem has increased recently with algorithmic improvements and the rapid growth in the sizes of sequence families. Progress could have major impacts in both structure and function prediction to name but two benefits. Sequence-based contact predictions are usually made by identifying correlated mutations within multiple sequence alignments (MSAs), most commonly through the information-theoretic approach of calculating mutual information between pairs of sites in proteins. These predictions are often inaccurate because the true covariation signal in the MSA is often masked by biases from many ancillary indirect-coupling or phylogenetic effects. Here we present a novel method, PSICOV, which introduces the use of sparse inverse covariance estimation to the problem of protein contact prediction. Our method builds on work which had previously demonstrated corrections for phylogenetic and entropic correlation noise and allows accurate discrimination of direct from indirectly coupled mutation correlations in the MSA. PSICOV displays a mean precision substantially better than the best performing normalized mutual information approach and Bayesian networks. For 118 out of 150 targets, the L/5 (i.e. top-L/5 predictions for a protein of length L) precision for long-range contacts (sequence separation >23) was ≥ 0.5, which represents an improvement sufficient to be of significant benefit in protein structure prediction or model quality assessment. The PSICOV source code can be downloaded from http://bioinf.cs.ucl.ac.uk/downloads/PSICOV.

Neural Network Pairwise Interaction Fields for Protein Model Quality Assessment and Ab Initio Protein Folding

In order to use a predicted protein structure one needs to know how good it is, as the utility of a model depends on its quality. To this aim, many Model Quality Assessment Programs (MQAP) have been developed over the last decade, with MQAP also being assessed at the CASP competition. We present a new knowledge-based MQAP which evaluates single protein structure models. We use a tree representation of the Cα trace to train a novel Neural Network Pairwise Interaction Field (NN-PIF) to predict the global quality of a model. NN-PIF allows fast evaluation of multiple structure models for a single sequence. In our tests on a large set of structures, our networks outperform most other methods based on different and more complex protein structure representations in global model quality prediction. Moreover, given NN-PIF can evaluate protein conformations very fast, we train a separate version of the model to gauge its ability to fold protein structures ab initio. We show that the resulting system, which relies only on basic information about the sequence and the Cα trace of a conformation, generally improves the quality of the structures it is presented with and may yield promising predictions in the absence of structural templates, although more research is required to harness the full potential of the model.

A machine learning-based method for protein global model quality assessment

Model quality assessment is an important task in protein structure prediction, which has been recently identified as one of the bottlenecks limiting the quality and usefulness of protein structure prediction methods. A new prediction category that evaluates the quality of protein models has been implemented since CASP7. In this study, a machine learning-based method for protein global model quality assessment (GMQA) is presented and the web server can be assessed at http://www.iipl.fudan.edu.cn/gmqa/index.html. The GMQA method takes a protein model as input and outputs the predicted MaxSub score that indicates the absolute quality of the protein model. The proposed method extracts the structural features from the 3D coordinates and assigns an absolute quality score to a model by support vector regression. Three types of features are extracted, including secondary structure, relative solvent accessibility, and contact. The closed test is performed on the CASP7 data set using cross validation. An open testing is performed on the LKF data set. In both tests, good correlations between the predicted and true scores are observed. Furthermore, our method is able to discriminate the native or near-native structures from a set of decoys. We also demonstrate that the GMQA method outperforms two existing methods, i.e. ProQ and Victor/FRST. Our results show that GMQA is a useful tool for model quality assessment and ranking.

Fast Geometric Consensus Approach for Protein Model Quality Assessment

Model quality assessment (MQA) is an integral part of protein structure prediction methods that typically generate multiple candidate models. The challenge lies in ranking and selecting the best models using a variety of physical, knowledge-based, and geometric consensus (GC)-based scoring functions. In particular, 3D-Jury and related GC methods assume that well-predicted (sub-)structures are more likely to occur frequently in a population of candidate models, compared to incorrectly folded fragments. While this approach is very successful in the context of diversified sets of models, identifying similar substructures is computationally expensive since all pairs of models need to be superimposed using MaxSub or related heuristics for structure-to-structure alignment. Here, we consider a fast alternative, in which structural similarity is assessed using 1D profiles, e.g., consisting of relative solvent accessibilities and secondary structures of equivalent amino acid residues in the respective models. We show that the new approach, dubbed 1D-Jury, allows to implicitly compare and rank N models in O(N) time, as opposed to quadratic complexity of 3D-Jury and related clustering-based methods. In addition, 1D-Jury avoids computationally expensive 3D superposition of pairs of models. At the same time, structural similarity scores based on 1D profiles are shown to correlate strongly with those obtained using MaxSub. In terms of the ability to select the best models as top candidates 1D-Jury performs on par with other GC methods. Other potential applications of the new approach, including fast clustering of large numbers of intermediate structures generated by folding simulations, are discussed as well.

A multilayer evaluation approach for protein structure prediction and model quality assessment

Protein tertiary structures are essential for studying functions of proteins at molecular level. An indispensable approach for protein structure solution is computational prediction. Most protein structure prediction methods generate candidate models first and select the best candidates by model quality assessment (QA). In many cases, good models can be produced, but the QA tools fail to select the best ones from the candidate model pool. Because of incomplete understanding of protein folding, each QA method only reflects partial facets of a structure model and thus has limited discerning power with no one consistently outperforming others. In this article, we developed a set of new QA methods, including two QA methods for evaluating target/template alignments, a molecular dynamics (MD)-based QA method, and three consensus QA methods with selected references to reveal new facets of protein structures complementary to the existing methods. Moreover, the underlying relationship among different QA methods were analyzed and then integrated into a multilayer evaluation approach to guide the model generation and model selection in prediction. All methods are integrated and implemented into an innovative and improved prediction system hereafter referred to as MUFOLD. In CASP8 and CASP9, MUFOLD has demonstrated the proof of the principles in terms of both QA discerning power and structure prediction accuracy.

Toward the estimation of the absolute quality of individual protein structure models

Motivation: Quality assessment of protein structures is an important part of experimental structure validation and plays a crucial role in protein structure prediction, where the predicted models may contain substantial errors. Most current scoring functions are primarily designed to rank alternative models of the same sequence supporting model selection, whereas the prediction of the absolute quality of an individual protein model has received little attention in the field. However, reliable absolute quality estimates are crucial to assess the suitability of a model for specific biomedical applications.Results: In this work, we present a new absolute measure for the quality of protein models, which provides an estimate of the ‘degree of nativeness’ of the structural features observed in a model and describes the likelihood that a given model is of comparable quality to experimental structures. Model quality estimates based on the QMEAN scoring function were normalized with respect to the number of interactions. The resulting scoring function is independent of the size of the protein and may therefore be used to assess both monomers and entire oligomeric assemblies. Model quality scores for individual models are then expressed as ‘Z-scores’ in comparison to scores obtained for high-resolution crystal structures. We demonstrate the ability of the newly introduced QMEAN Z-score to detect experimentally solved protein structures containing significant errors, as well as to evaluate theoretical protein models.In a comprehensive QMEAN Z-score analysis of all experimental structures in the PDB, membrane proteins accumulate on one side of the score spectrum and thermostable proteins on the other. Proteins from the thermophilic organism Thermatoga maritima received significantly higher QMEAN Z-scores in a pairwise comparison with their homologous mesophilic counterparts, underlining the significance of the QMEAN Z-score as an estimate of protein stability.Availability: The Z-score calculation has been integrated in the QMEAN server available at: http://swissmodel.expasy.org/qmean.Contact: torsten.schwede@unibas.chSupplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

QMEAN server for protein model quality estimation

Model quality estimation is an essential component of protein structure prediction, since ultimately the accuracy of a model determines its usefulness for specific applications. Usually, in the course of protein structure prediction a set of alternative models is produced, from which subsequently the most accurate model has to be selected. The QMEAN server provides access to two scoring functions successfully tested at the eighth round of the community-wide blind test experiment CASP. The user can choose between the composite scoring function QMEAN, which derives a quality estimate on the basis of the geometrical analysis of single models, and the clustering-based scoring function QMEANclust which calculates a global and local quality estimate based on a weighted all-against-all comparison of the models from the ensemble provided by the user. The web server performs a ranking of the input models and highlights potentially problematic regions for each model. The QMEAN server is available at http://swissmodel.expasy.org/qmean.

Protein structure prediction and model quality assessment

Protein structures have proven to be a crucial piece of information for biomedical research. Of the millions of currently sequenced proteins only a small fraction is experimentally solved for structure and the only feasible way to bridge the gap between sequence and structure data is computational modeling. Half a century has passed since it was shown that the amino acid sequence of a protein determines its shape, but a method to translate the sequence code reliably into the 3D structure still remains to be developed. This review summarizes modern protein structure prediction techniques with the emphasis on comparative modeling, and describes the recent advances in methods for theoretical model quality assessment.