INTRODUCTION: Colonoscopy is the only colorectal cancer screening modality that permits direct visualization of the entire colon and removal of polyps. Low-quality bowel preparation has been associated with lower adenoma detection rates, increased procedure time, and increased hospital cost. An inadequate preparation limits the diagnostic accuracy and overall efficacy of colonoscopy. Factors that contribute to inadequate bowel preparations include age, male sex, inpatient status, low socioeconomic status, low English proficiency, obesity, diabetes, and cirrhosis. We investigated the complex relationship between socioeconomic factors and medical comorbidities on the quality of inpatient colonoscopy preparation. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of inpatient colonoscopies between October 2017 and April 2019. All patients received a single-dose preparation of polyethylene glycol. We collected data including demographics, medical history, indication, and bowel preparation. A Boston Bowel Preparation Score of 6 or above or an Aronchick score of “good” or “excellent” was used to define an adequate preparation. RESULTS: A total of 230 patients were included in the final analysis (Table 1). An inadequate bowel preparation was reported in 16.1% of our inpatient colonoscopies. Within the inadequate preparation group, a greater percentage of patients were male (17.3% vs. 12.3%), had low English proficiency (18.3% vs.15.3%), were not diabetic (17.7% vs.12.3%), and did not have prior bowel surgery (16.4% vs. 0.0%). Within the age, race/ethnicity, and insurance subgroups, patients who were age 80+ (21.4%), Asian-American (25%), unreported race/ethnicity (29.4%), uninsured (25%), and prisoners (22.8%) had a greater percentage of inadequate preparation (Table 2). A logistic regression was performed to assess the effects of age, sex, race/ethnicity, insurance, English fluency, diabetes, restricted mobility, and prior surgery on bowel preparation. The logistic regression model was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: No significant socioeconomic or medical predictors of bowel preparation were found in this inpatient population which is in contrast to prior literature. While less than 20% of our patient population had inadequate bowel preparation, this is still significant in the broader context of quality, safety, and healthcare costs. Identifying strategies to increase the quality of bowel preparation still remains at the forefront of our field.