Quality Of Care For Adults Research Articles

Feasibility of Using Electronic Medical Record Data for Tracking Quality Indicators in Adults with Congenital Heart Disease.

In order to determine the feasibility of tracking quality of care in adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD), we aimed to estimate the availability of relevant data in electronic medical records (EMR) used in North American ACHD centers. Previously proposed quality indicators (QIs) were reviewed to consider what types of data would be required for each. ACHD program directors were surveyed about the nature of electronic data in existing EMRs. From the survey, the availability of data types needed for the denominator and numerator of each QI were estimated, and an overall estimate of data availability was calculated for each QI. These estimates were adjusted by the sensitivity of identifying the patients through administrative codes. Analysis was repeated for scenarios in which various data type estimates were hypothetically dropped by half to determine the overall impact of each data type. A total of 64 ACHD program directors responded to the survey. Of 55 QIs, average estimated data availability was 67%. QIs for tetralogy of Fallot had the highest estimated data availability (mean 88%), whereas those for atrial septal defect were lowest (mean 23%), reflecting both the need for interpretation of imaging studies and the lower reliability of billing codes for identification of ACHD patients. QIs with highest estimates were based largely on administrative data, which had the biggest impact on overall estimates. QIs needing interpretation of imaging findings had the lowest estimates, as well as certain overuse measures. For a wide range of ACHD programs, data for proposed QIs based on administrative data are most likely to be obtainable through EMR. Data related to imaging interpretation or overuse measures are least likely. Our findings can inform future efforts to establish registry efforts or data reporting tools to track these indicators.

Impact of socio-economic position on health and quality of care in adults with Type 2 diabetes in France: the Entred 2007 study.

To describe the association between socio-economic position, health status and quality of diabetes care in people with Type 2 diabetes in France, where people may receive full healthcare coverage for chronic disease. Data from a national cross-sectional survey performed in people pharmacologically treated for diabetes were used. They combined data from medical claims, hospital discharge, questionnaires for patients (n = 3894 with Type 2 diabetes) and their physicians (n = 2485). Socio-economic position was assessed using educational level (low, intermediate, high) and ability to make ends meet (financial difficulties vs. financially comfortable). People with diabetes reporting financial difficulties were more likely to be smokers (adjusted odds ratio 1.4; 95% CI 1.1-1.6) and obese (adjusted odds ratio 1.3; 95% CI 1.2-1.6) and to have poorer glycaemic control (HbA1c > 64 mmol/mol (8%); adjusted odds ratio 1.4; 95% CI 1.1-1.8), than those who were financially comfortable. They were more likely to have their diabetes diagnosed because of complications (adjusted odds ratio 1.6; 95% CI 1.3-2.0). They were also more likely to have coronary and podiatric complications (adjusted odds ratios 1.3; 95% CI 1.1-1.6 and 1.7; 95% CI 1.4-2.2, respectively). They benefited more often from full coverage (adjusted odds ratio 1.3; 95% CI 1.1-1.6), visited general practitioners more often (ratio of estimated marginal means 1.2; 95% CI 1.1-1.2) but specialists less often (adjusted odds ratio 0.7; 95% CI 0.6-0.8 for a visit to private ophthalmologist). They also felt less well informed about their condition. Despite frequent access to full healthcare coverage, socio-economic position has an impact on the diagnosis of diabetes, health status and quality of diabetes care in France.

Baseline assessment of adult and adolescent primary care delivery in Rwanda: an opportunity for quality improvement

BackgroundAs resource-limited health systems evolve to address complex diseases, attention must be returned to basic primary care delivery. Limited data exists detailing the quality of general adult and adolescent primary care delivered at front-line facilities in these regions. Here we describe the baseline quality of care for adults and adolescents in rural Rwanda.MethodsPatients aged 13 and older presenting to eight rural health center outpatient departments in one district in southeastern Rwanda between February and March 2011 were included. Routine nurse-delivered care was observed by clinical mentors trained in the WHO Integrated Management of Adolescent & Adult Illness (IMAI) protocol using standardized checklists, and compared to decisions made by the clinical mentor as the gold standard.ResultsFour hundred and seventy consultations were observed. Of these, only 1.5% were screened and triaged for emergency conditions. Fewer than 10% of patients were routinely screened for chronic conditions including HIV, tuberculosis, anemia or malnutrition. Nurses correctly diagnosed 50.1% of patient complaints (95% CI: 45.7%-54.5%) and determined the correct treatment 44.9% of the time (95% CI: 40.6%-49.3%). Correct diagnosis and treatment varied significantly across health centers (p = 0.03 and p = 0.04, respectively).ConclusionFundamental gaps exist in adult and adolescent primary care delivery in Rwanda, including triage, screening, diagnosis, and treatment, with significant variability across conditions and facilities. Research and innovation toward improving and standardizing primary care delivery in sub-Saharan Africa is required. IMAI, supported by routine mentorship, is one potentially important approach to establishing the standards necessary for high-quality care.

P146 Adapting and Implementing Guidelines For Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)

BackgroundAdaptation of high-quality external guidelines can be an efficient and effective means to develop guidance more rapidly, allowing for shifting of resources to knowledge transfer and health system implementation efforts.ContextTo...

New Report Asks Why Pediatric Hospital Readmission Rates Vary Widely

“Ten diagnoses accounted for 30% of all pediatric hospital readmissions.” HOSPITAL READMISSION RATES have become important indicators of quality of care in adults, but little is known about pediatric readmissions. A new study published in the January issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association looks at readmission rates at dedicated pediatric hospitals and found great variability. To determine the prevalence and variation of readmissions within 30 days, investigators analyzed 568,845 unplanned admissions at 72 children's hospitals (almost 15% of the pediatric discharges in the United States) between July 1, 2009 and June 30, 2010. They used data from the National Association of Children's Hospitals and Related Institutions (NACHHI) Case Mix, adjusting hospitals' readmission rates for chronic conditions that increase the risk of re-hospitalization. The researchers found that the overall readmission rate was 6.5%; 39% were within 7 days and 62% were within 14 days (by contrast, reported readmission rates at adult hospitals range from 20 to 25%). Variability between hospitals was wide, with hospitals with 1 SD above the mean having a readmission rate of 7.2% versus 5.6% in hospitals 1 SD below the mean, a relative difference of 28.6%. Among readmitted children, 35% had a chronic condition and 30% had two or more chronic conditions. Ten diagnoses accounted for 30% of all pediatric hospital readmissions. Readmission rates for the 10 highest diagnoses were: anemia/neutropenia (23%); ventricular shunt (18%) sickle cell anemia (17%); seizures or gastroenteritis (7%); upper respiratory infections (6%); pneumonia, appendectomy, or bronchiolitis (5%) and asthma (3%). Older children (age range, 13–18 years) had high readmission rates, as did black, and children with public insurance or length of stay 7 days or longer. For those children with the 10 diagnoses with the highest readmission rates, their readmission rates were 17 to 66% higher in hospitals with higher than

The quality of care for adults with epilepsy: an initial glimpse using the QUIET measure

The quality of care for adults with epilepsy: an initial glimpse using the QUIET measure

The quality of care for adults with epilepsy: an initial glimpse using the QUIET measure

BackgroundWe examined the quality of adult epilepsy care using the Quality Indicators in Epilepsy Treatment (QUIET) measure, and variations in quality based on the source of epilepsy care.MethodsWe identified 311 individuals with epilepsy diagnosis between 2004 and 2007 in a tertiary medical center in New England. We abstracted medical charts to identify the extent to which participants received quality indicator (QI) concordant care for individual QI's and the proportion of recommended care processes completed for different aspects of epilepsy care over a two year period. Finally, we compared the proportion of recommended care processes completed for those receiving care only in primary care, neurology clinics, or care shared between primary care and neurology providers.ResultsThe mean proportion of concordant care by indicator was 55.6 (standard deviation = 31.5). Of the 1985 possible care processes, 877 (44.2%) were performed; care specific to women had the lowest concordance (37% vs. 42% [first seizure evaluation], 44% [initial epilepsy treatment], 45% [chronic care]). Individuals receiving shared care had more aspects of QI concordant care performed than did those receiving neurology care for initial treatment (53% vs. 43%; X2 = 9.0; p = 0.01) and chronic epilepsy care (55% vs. 42%; X2 = 30.2; p < 0.001).ConclusionsSimilar to most other chronic diseases, less than half of recommended care processes were performed. Further investigation is needed to understand whether a shared-care model enhances quality of care, and if so, how it leads to improvements in quality.

The Enhancing Secondary Prevention in Coronary Artery Disease trial

Proven efficacious therapies are sometimes underused in patients with chronic cardiac conditions, resulting in suboptimal outcomes. We evaluated whether evidence summaries, which were either unsigned or signed by local opinion leaders, improved the quality of secondary prevention care delivered by primary care physicians of patients with coronary artery disease. We performed a randomized trial, clustered at the level of the primary care physician, with 3 study arms: control, unsigned statements or opinion leader statements. The statements were faxed to primary care physicians of adults with coronary artery disease at the time of elective cardiac catheterization. The primary outcome was improvement in statin management (initiation or dose increase) 6 months after catheterization. We enrolled 480 adults from 252 practices. Although statin use was high at baseline (n=316 [66%]), most patients were taking a low dose (mean 32% of the guideline-recommended dose), and their low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels were elevated (mean 3.09 mmol/L). Six months after catheterization, statin management had improved in 79 of 157 patients (50%) in the control arm, 85 of 158 (54%) patients in the unsigned statement group (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.18, 95% CI 0.71-1.94, p=0.52) and 99 of 165 (60%) patients in the opinion leader statement group (adjusted OR 1.51, 95% CI 0.94-2.42, p=0.09). The mean fasting LDL cholesterol levels after 6 months were similar in all 3 study arms: 2.35 (standard deviation [SD] 0.86) mmol/L in the control arm compared with 2.24 (SD 0.73) among those in the opinion leader group (p=0.48) and 2.19 (SD 0.68) in the unsigned statement group (p=0.32). Faxed evidence reminders for primary care physicians, even when endorsed by local opinion leaders, were insufficient to optimize the quality of care for adults with coronary artery disease. ClinicalTrials.gov trial register no. NCT00175240.

What constitutes high quality of care for adults with epilepsy?

Providers are increasingly being held accountable for the quality of care provided. While quality indicators have been used to benchmark the quality of care for a number of other disease states, no such measures are available for evaluating the quality of care provided to adults with epilepsy. In order to assess and improve quality of care, it is critical to develop valid quality indicators. Our objective is to describe the development of quality indicators for evaluating care of adults with epilepsy. As most care is provided in primary and general neurology care, we focused our assessment of quality on care within primary care and general neurology clinics. We reviewed existing national clinical guidelines and systematic reviews of the literature to develop an initial list of quality indicators; supplemented the list with indicators derived from patient focus groups; and convened a 10-member expert panel to rate the appropriateness, reliability, and necessity of each quality indicator. From the original 37 evidence-based and 10 patient-based quality indicators, the panel identified 24 evidence-based and 5 patient-based indicators as appropriate indicators of quality. Of these, the panel identified 9 that were not necessary for high quality care. There is, at best, a poor understanding of the quality of care provided for adults with epilepsy. These indicators, developed based on published evidence, expert opinion, and patient perceptions, provide a basis to assess and improve the quality of care for this population.

Potential Health and Economic Consequences of Misplaced Priorities

Northfield, Ill: College of American Pathologists; 2006. 19. Hsu J, Price M, Huang J, et al. Unintended consequences of caps on Medicare drug benefits. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:2349-2359. 20. Brown AF, Gregg EW, Stevens MR, et al. Race, ethnicity, socioeconomic position, and quality of care for adults with diabetes enrolled in managed care: the Translating Research Into Action for Diabetes (TRIAD) study. Diabetes Care. 2005; 28:2864-2870. 21. Huang ES, Shook M, Jin L, Chin MH, Meltzer DO. The impact of patient preferences on the cost-effectiveness of intensive glucose control in older patients with new-onset diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2006;29:259-264. 22. National Committee for Quality Assurance. Bridges to Excellence. http://www .bridgestoexcellence.org/physicians/dcl.htm. Accessed November 12, 2006. 23. Vijan S, Hofer TP, Hayward RA. Estimated benefits of glycemic control in microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes. Ann Intern Med. 1997;127:788795. 24. Pogach LM, Rajan M, Aron DC. Comparison of weighted performance measurement and dichotomous thresholds for glycemic control in the Veterans Health Administration. Diabetes Care. 2006;29:241-246. 25. Engelgau MM. Trying to predict the future for people with diabetes: a tough but important task. Ann Intern Med. 2005;143:301-302.

Differences In Access To High-Quality Outpatient Care In Indonesia

Using a representative cross-section of health care providers in Indonesia, we describe variations in prenatal, child, and adult care quality. Quality is measured as knowledge about clinical guidelines. Public health centers offer above-average-quality prenatal care, and private physicians provide high-quality curative care. Private nurses offer below-average care, as do most providers in the more remote regions of Outer Java-Bali. The poor and wealthy have access to the same levels of quality; however, the poorest women report receiving fewer prenatal procedures. Recommendations include improving the professional development of nurses in private settings, testing quality improvements in Outer Java-Bali, and investigating wealth disparities in quality received.

Race, Ethnicity, Socioeconomic Position, and Quality of Care for Adults With Diabetes Enrolled in Managed Care

To examine racial/ethnic and socioeconomic variation in diabetes care in managed-care settings. We studied 7,456 adults enrolled in health plans participating in the Translating Research Into Action for Diabetes study, a six-center cohort study of diabetes in managed care. Cross-sectional analyses using hierarchical regression models assessed processes of care (HbA(1c) [A1C], lipid, and proteinuria assessment; foot and dilated eye examinations; use or advice to use aspirin; and influenza vaccination) and intermediate health outcomes (A1C, LDL, and blood pressure control). Most quality indicators and intermediate outcomes were comparable across race/ethnicity and socioeconomic position (SEP). Latinos and Asians/Pacific Islanders had similar or better processes and intermediate outcomes than whites with the exception of slightly higher A1C levels. Compared with whites, African Americans had lower rates of A1C and LDL measurement and influenza vaccination, higher rates of foot and dilated eye examinations, and the poorest blood pressure and lipid control. The main SEP difference was lower rates of dilated eye examinations among poorer and less educated individuals. In almost all instances, racial/ethnic minorities or low SEP participants with poor glycemic, blood pressure, and lipid control received similar or more appropriate intensification of therapy relative to whites or those with higher SEP. In these managed-care settings, minority race/ethnicity was not consistently associated with worse processes or outcomes, and not all differences favored whites. The only notable SEP disparity was in rates of dilated eye examinations. Social disparities in health may be reduced in managed-care settings.

Insurance and quality of care for adults with acute asthma.

The relationship between health care insurance and quality of medical care remains incompletely studied. We sought to determine whether type of patient insurance is related to quality of care and subsequent outcomes for patients who arrive in the emergency department (ED) for acute asthma. Using prospectively collected data from the Multicenter Airway Research Collaboration, we compared measures of quality of pre-ED care, acute severity, and short-term outcomes across 4 insurance categories: managed care, indemnity, Medicaid, and uninsured. Emergency departments at 57 academic medical centers enrolled 1,019 adults with acute asthma. Patients with managed care ranked first and uninsured patients ranked last on all 7 unadjusted quality measures. After controlling for covariates, uninsured patients had significantly lower quality of care than indemnity patients for 5 of 7 measures and had lower initial peak expiratory flow rates than indemnity insured patients. Patients with managed care insurance were more likely than indemnity-insured patients to identify a primary care physician and report using inhaled steroids in the month prior to arrival in the ED. Patients with Medicaid insurance were more likely than indemnity-insured patients to use the ED as their usual source of care for problems with asthma. We found no differences in patient outcomes among the insurance categories we studied. Uninsured patients had consistently poorer quality of care and than insured patients. Despite differences in indicators of quality of care between types of insurance, we found no differences in short-term patient outcomes by type of insurance.

Standards for patients with renal failure

A recent report aims to improve the quality of care for adults with serious kidney failure. An expert committee sets out the recommended standards of care for patients who may need dialysis, transplantation or other treatment for renal disease. This report summarises their work.