Home Healthcare Quality Research Articles

A comparative study of home healthcare quality in urban and rural home health agencies throughout the USA (2010-22).

Urban-rural disparities in medical care, including in home healthcare, persist globally. With aging populations and medical advancements, demand for home health services rises, warranting investigation into home healthcare disparities. Our study aimed to (i) investigate the impact of rurality on home healthcare quality, and (ii) assess the temporal disparities and the changes in disparities in home healthcare quality between urban and rural home health agencies (HHAs), incorporating an analysis of geospatial distribution to visualize the underlying patterns. This study analyzed data from HHAs listed on the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services website, covering the period from 2010 to 2022. Data were classified into urban and rural categories for each HHA. We employed panel data analysis to examine the impact of rurality on home healthcare quality, specifically focusing on hospital admission and emergency room (ER) visit rates. Disparities between urban and rural HHAs were assessed using the Wilcoxon test, with results visualized through line and dot plots and heat maps to illustrate trends and differences comprehensively. Rurality is demonstrated as the most significant variable in hospital admission and ER visit rates in the panel data analysis. Urban HHAs consistently exhibit significantly lower hospital admission rates and ER visit rates compared to rural HHAs from 2010 to 2022. Longitudinally, the gap in hospital admission rates between urban and rural HHAs is shrinking, while there is an increasing gap in ER visit rates. In 2022, HHAs in Mountain areas, which are characterized by a higher proportion of rural regions, exhibited higher hospital admission and ER visit rates than other areas. This study underscores the persistent urban-rural disparities in home healthcare quality. The analysis emphasizes the ongoing need for targeted interventions to address disparities in home healthcare delivery and ensure equitable access to quality care across urban and rural regions. Our findings have the potential to inform policy and practice, promoting equity and efficiency in the long-term care system, for better health outcomes throughout the USA.

Geriatric Nursing Practitioner's Impact on Home Healthcare Quality: A Systematic Review

Geriatric Nursing Practitioner's Impact on Home Healthcare Quality: A Systematic Review

IMPACT OF HOME HEALTH VALUE-BASED PURCHASE MODEL ON OWNERSHIP OF HOME HEALTH AGENCY: A LONGITUDINAL ANALYSIS

Abstract Home health care serves over 5 million Americans “aging in place”. In January 2016, home health value-based purchasing model (HHVBP) was introduced and piloted in 9 states in the US with a purpose of improving care quality and efficiency, and expanded nationwide in 2023. This study aimed to examine the impact of HHVBP on business operation of home health agencies (HHA), including ownership changes. This is a longitudinal study using 7 years (2013-2019) of data from two national data sources. A dummy variable was used to indicate whether an HHA is in a state with HHVBP or not. Ownership measures included both the type and changes of ownership between 2013-2017. A total of 14,334 HHAs (95,137 agency-years) were included in analysis. Of the 14,334 agencies, about 19% were in HHVBP states, 88% continued business in all study years, 1679 were new agencies and 49 agencies discontinued business. In HHVBP states, 363 out of 2781 (13%) were newly added, compared to 1316 out of 11,553 (11%) in non-HHVBP states. Agencies in HHVBP states were more likely to be public agencies (e.g., 6.08% vs. 4.97% in 2013; 5.62% vs. 4.60% in 2018), though it slightly decreased over time; and experience changes in ownership and particularly the years after the implementation of HHVBP (e.g.,2.44% vs. 2.38% in 2013; 7.03% vs. 4.39% in 2018). The HHVBP can have a significant impact on the operation and ownership type of home health agency, which in turn may impact availability and quality of home health care.

PATIENT-CLINICIAN RELATIONSHIPS IN HOME HEALTH CARE

Abstract Patient-clinician relationships are fundamental attributes of high-quality home health care (HHC); yet little is known about patient-clinician relationships in HHC (where 5 million Medicare beneficiaries receive care annually). The objective of the study was to describe perspectives of HHC patients and HHC clinicians about patient-clinician relationships in HHC. We conducted a secondary qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews (n=34) from a completed qualitative study investigating perspectives of older adult HHC patients (or caregivers as proxy) and their HHC clinicians (17 pairs) on discharge preparedness in a large HHC organization in North-Carolina. A conceptual model of patient-clinician relationships guided content analysis of the interview data. HHC patients identified as White (65%) and black (35%). Most HHC patients reported female sex (53%) and average age was 83 years (range= 69-93). Clinicians were registered nurses and physical therapists. Across the patient-clinician pairs, HHC patients valued relationships with clinicians with shared commonalities and those who provided reciprocal informational exchange and respected their autonomy. HHC clinicians valued relationships in which they felt helpful and respected as a healthcare professional. Relational conflicts arose when there was discordance in expectations of care (e.g., type of HHC services provided). Conflicts also arose when organizational constraints, such as disruptive scheduling, limited HHC visit time, and when limited continuity of care prevented the formation of patient-clinician relationships. Relational conflicts and organizational constraints influence patient-clinician relationships in HHC. Multi-level interventions (targeting modifiable factors at the patient, clinician, and organizational levels) are needed to improve the patient-clinician relationships and the quality of HHC.

Home Health Care Clinicians' Use of Judgment Language for Black and Hispanic Patients: Natural Language Processing Study.

A clinician's biased behavior toward patients can affect the quality of care. Recent literature reviews report on widespread implicit biases among clinicians. Although emerging studies in hospital settings show racial biases in the language used in clinical documentation within electronic health records, no studies have yet investigated the extent of judgment language in home health care. We aimed to examine racial differences in judgment language use and the relationship between judgment language use and the amount of time clinicians spent on home visits as a reflection of care quality in home health care. This study is a retrospective observational cohort study. Study data were extracted from a large urban home health care organization in the Northeastern United States. Study data set included patients (N=45,384) who received home health care services between January 1 and December 31, 2019. The study applied a natural language processing algorithm to automatically detect the language of judgment in clinical notes. The use of judgment language was observed in 38% (n=17,141) of the patients. The highest use of judgment language was found in Hispanic (7,167/66,282, 10.8% of all clinical notes), followed by Black (7,010/65,628, 10.7%), White (10,206/107,626, 9.5%), and Asian (1,756/22,548, 7.8%) patients. Black and Hispanic patients were 14% more likely to have notes with judgment language than White patients. The length of a home health care visit was reduced by 21 minutes when judgment language was used. Racial differences were identified in judgment language use. When judgment language is used, clinicians spend less time at patients' homes. Because the language clinicians use in documentation is associated with the time spent providing care, further research is needed to study the impact of using judgment language on quality of home health care. Policy, education, and clinical practice improvements are needed to address the biases behind judgment language.

Access and Quality of Pediatric Home Healthcare: A Systematic Review

Despite the rising prevalence of children with medical complexity who need extensive medical care at home, the literature evaluating pediatric home healthcare has not been well summarized. Our objective was to systematically review the evidence-base of pediatric home healthcare to understand what is currently know about access and quality of home healthcare for children. Pubmed, Ovid Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Proquest Dissertations and Theses Global were searched for studies in the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia English publications (1980-2020) regarding children (≤18 years) using shift-based home healthcare services. Blinded independent review was conducted followed by extraction of study characteristics including how each study examined access and/or quality, which was categorized using the National Academy of Medicine quality dimensions. Of 9533 abstracts, 101 were included. Most were US (82%) and regional (72%) studies. Half (54%) focused on home nursing followed by home services generally (43%). The majority (77%) evaluated access and patient-family centeredness (62%); their results identified consistent limitations in access and quality resulting in negative impacts on patients and families. Less than 20% of publications addressed safety, effectiveness or equity. Bias scoring found that quantitative studies were universally weak, but qualitative studies were mostly moderate or strong. Results are limited by design heterogeneity and exclusion of training research. While research in pediatric home healthcare has increased, studies remain observational and rarely evaluate quality in reproducible ways. More rigorous measures and interventional research are needed to improve this healthcare sector for children.

Monitoring of Sleep Breathing States Based on Audio Sensor Utilizing Mel-Scale Features in Home Healthcare.

Sleep-related breathing disorders (SBDs) will lead to poor sleep quality and increase the risk of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases which may cause death in serious cases. This paper aims to detect breathing states related to SBDs by breathing sound signals. A moment waveform analysis is applied to locate and segment the breathing cycles. As the core of our study, a set of useful features of breathing signal is proposed based on Mel frequency cepstrum analysis. Finally, the normal and abnormal sleep breathing states can be distinguished by the extracted Mel-scale indexes. Young healthy testers and patients who suffered from obstructive sleep apnea are tested utilizing the proposed method. The average accuracy for detecting abnormal breathing states can reach 93.1%. It will be helpful to prevent SBDs and improve the sleep quality of home healthcare.

PediHome: Development of a Family-Reported Measure of Pediatric Home Healthcare Quality.

No validated tools exist to measure pediatric home healthcare quality. The objective of this work was to develop a family-reported survey (PediHome) to measure the quality of home healthcare for children with medical complexity (CMC). A national multidisciplinary expert panel (N=19) was convened to develop survey content domains. Panelist were joined by 3 additional experts to rank candidate survey items for importance and evaluate relevance and structure. Cognitive interviews were conducted with English-speaking (n=12) and Spanish-speaking (n=4) family caregivers of CMC to revise problematic items and clarify response options. A cross-sectional survey was then fielded (6/1/20-10/31/20) to parents whose children receive healthcare at 2 regional academic medical centers. The final measure included N=28 total items with 4 items quantifying access, 1 evaluating overall quality rating, and 21 items assessing provider tasks (11 home nursing only, 2 certified nursing assistant/home health aide only, and 1 dual). Out of 312 caregivers of CMC, 142 (46%) responded and one-half (n=68, 48%) reported a child receiving home nursing. They received a weekly median of 58.4% (IQR ±31.2%) of approved nursing hours with 55% reporting a missed nursing shift within the last month. Median overall quality was 75-9 (0-10 scale) and median scores on specific quality items ranged from 31-4 to 43-4 (0-4 scale). PediHome is a new content-valid family-reported measure of home healthcare quality for CMC that is useful for evaluating healthcare quality across several domains. Future work will involve assessing PediHome's construct and predictive validity.

Systematic Review of Rural and Urban Differences in Care Provided by Home Health Agencies in the United States.

Home health care agencies (HHAs) are skilled care providers for Medicare home health beneficiaries in the United States. Rural HHAs face different challenges from their urban counterparts in delivering care (eg, longer distances to travel to patient homes leading to higher fuel/travel costs and fewer number of visits in a day, impacting the quality of home health care for rural beneficiaries). We review evidence on differences in care outcomes provided by urban and rural HHAs. Systematic review guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for quality appraisal. Care provided by urban and rural HHAs. We conducted a systematic search for English-language peer-reviewed articles after 2010 on differences in urban and rural care provided by U.S. HHAs. We screened 876 studies, conducted full-text abstraction and NOS quality review on 36 articles and excluded 2 for poor study quality. Twelve studies were included; 7 focused on patient-level analyses and 5 were HHA-level. Nine studies were cross-sectional and 3 used cohorts. Urban and rural differences were measured primarily using a binary variable. All studies controlled for agency-level characteristics, and two-thirds also controlled for patient characteristics. Rural beneficiaries, compared with urban, had lower home health care utilization (4 of 5 studies) and fewer visits for physical therapy and/or rehabilitation (3 of 5 studies). Rural agencies had lower quality of HHA services (3 of 4 studies). Rural patients, compared with urban, visited the emergency room more often (2 of 2 studies) and were more likely to be hospitalized (2 of 2 studies), whereas urban patients with heart failure were more likely to have 30-day preventable hospitalizations (1 study). This review highlights similar urban/rural disparities in home health care quality and utilization as identified in previous decades. Variables used to measure the access to and quality of care by HHAs varied, so consensus was limited. Articles that used more granular measures of rurality (rather than binary measures) revealed additional differences. These findings point to the need for consistent and refined measures of rurality in studies examining urban and rural differences in care from HHAs.

Value-Based Payments in Health Care: Evidence from a Nationwide Randomized Experiment in the Home Health Sector.

Value-based payment programs, also known as pay-for-performance, use financial incentives to motivate providers to invest in quality and are a critical part of Medicare health care reform. This study examines the first year of the Home Health Value-Based Purchasing program, a nationally representative cluster randomized experiment implemented by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services in 2016. The goal of the program is to achieve better home health care quality. Home health agencies in treatment states were rewarded or penalized based on their performance on agency-reported and non-agency-reported quality measures. The program improved agency-reported measures by approximately one percentage point, and performance gains suggest a dose-response relationship with respect to incentive size. However, the performance gains in agency-reported measures did not reflect true quality improvement. I find evidence that agencies manipulated their coding of patients and inflated their performance. Coding manipulation explains the entirety of the program's impact on agency-reported measures.

Cultural Factors and Social Changes Affecting Home Healthcare in Iran: A Qualitative Study

In Iran, home healthcare (HHC) is provided in a diverse socio-cultural context. Health professionals’ inadequate knowledge of the socio-cultural factors of the society can lead to poor quality HHC. Even so, the ways these factors influence HHC remain unclear. This study aimed to explore the effects of cultural factors and social changes on HHC in Iran. This qualitative study which follows a conventional content analysis approach was conducted in Tabriz, Iran. Eighteen individuals including nurses, home health directors, physicians, policy-makers, patients, and their families participated in the study. Participants were selected using purposive sampling. Data collection involved focus group discussion (FGD) and 16 semi-structured in-depth interviews. In order to analyze the data, Graneheim and Lundman’s techniques were used and data collection continued until saturation was reached. Five main themes emerged from the data analysis including cultural diversity issues, society’s understanding of HHC, shifting demographics affecting healthcare needs, transitioning from traditional to modern lifeways, and increasing unaffordability of healthcare. Health managers can improve the accessibility and acceptability of HHC services by identifying the socio-cultural needs of the society. Future research should develop and test patients and families’ cultural care models in the HHC setting.

Rural and urban disparities in quality of home health care: A longitudinal cohort study (2014-2018).

Home health care is one of the fastest growing health care sectors in the United States. However, little is known of differences in trends in quality performance between rural and urban home health agencies over time. This study aimed to examine disparities in quality performance between rural and urban home health agencies between 2014 and 2018. This is a cohort study using 2014-2018 national Home Health Compare data and Providers of Service Profile data, including 7,908 home health agencies, of which 1,537 were rural agencies. Quality performance measures included timely initiation of care, hospitalization, and emergency department (ED) visits. Two-level hierarchical regression models were used to identify rural-urban differences in these quality indicators over time when controlling organizational characteristics. Rural agencies were less likely to be for-profit and accredited, and more likely to be hospital-based, serve both Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries, and have hospice programs. Rural agencies consistently outperformed on timely initiation of care over time, and urban agencies consistently outperformed on hospitalization and ED visits over time. These gaps between rural and urban agencies were steady over time except the gap in hospitalization, which slightly narrowed over time (Coef. = 0.11, P = .001 for urban and year interaction term). Significant differences exist in quality of care between rural and urban home health agencies and such differences have not been significantly narrowed over time. To reduce rural-urban disparities, policy makers should take into account unique challenges faced by urban and rural agencies when making policy decisions.

The Effects of Home Health Value-Based Purchasing on Home Health Care Quality in For-Profit and Nonprofit Agencies: A Comparative Interrupted Time-Series Analysis, 2012–2018

Beginning in 2016, the Home Health Value-Based Purchasing (HHVBP) model incentivized U.S. Medicare-certified home health agencies (HHAs) in nine states to improve quality of patient care and patient experience. Here, we quantified HHVBP effects upon quality over time (2012-2018) by HHA ownership (i.e., for-profit vs. nonprofit) using a comparative interrupted time-series design. Our outcome measures were Care Quality and Patient Experience indices composed of 10 quality of patient care measures and five patient experience measures, respectively. Overall, 17.7% of HHAs participated in the HHVBP model of which 81.4% were for-profit ownership. Each year after implementation, HHVBP was associated with a 1.59 (p < .001) percentage point increase in the Care Quality index among for-profit HHAs and a 0.71 (p = .024) percentage point increase in the Patient Experience index among nonprofits. The differences of quality improvement under the HHVBP model by ownership indicate variations in HHA leadership responses to HHVBP.

Home Health Care Quality Standards Self-Assessment Results: Training and Research Hospital Example

Giriş: Yaşlanan nüfusun artması bazı sorunları da beraberinde getirmektedir. Bu sorunların başında nitelikli, uzun dönem bakım hizmetlerinin gerekliliği gelmektedir. Türkiye’de, 65 ve daha yukarı yaştaki nüfus son beş yılda %21,9 artmış olup yaşlı nüfus oranının 2023 yılında %10,2 ve 2080 yılında %25,6 olacağı öngörülmektedir. Bu bağlamda evde sağlık hizmetlerinin önemi giderek artmaktadır. Evde sağlık hizmetleri, çeşitli hastalıklar nedeniyle evde sağlık hizmeti almaya ihtiyacı olan bireylere, profesyonel bir ekip tarafından verilen hizmettir. Bu araştırmada bir eğitim araştırma hastanesinin evde sağlık hizmetleri kalite standartlarını karşılama düzeyinin belirlenmesi amaçlanmaktadır. Yöntem: Evde sağlık hizmetleri kalite standart ve değerlendirme ölçütlerinin karşılanma düzeyini belirlemek amacıyla yapılan bu çalışma tanımlayıcı niteliktedir. Veri toplama aracı olarak Sağlık Bakanlığı tarafından yayımlanan “Sağlıkta Kalite Standartları Hastane- Sürüm 6” setinde yer alan evde sağlık hizmetleri kalite standartları kullanılmıştır. Verilerin değerlendirilmesi Microsoft Excel yazılımından yararlanılmıştır. Bulgular: Araştırmada eğitim ve araştırma hastanesinin, evde sağlık hizmetleri kalite standartlarının karşılanma düzeyini belirlemek için belirli periyotta üç kez yapılan öz değerlendirme gerçekleştirilmiştir. İlk öz değerlendirme sonuçları; 10 standarttan 3 tanesi karşılanmıyor, 4 standart kısmen karşılanıyor, 3 standart ise karşılanıyor olarak bulunmuştur. Öz değerlendirme sonrası tespit edilen aksaklıklar ile ilgili düzeltici faaliyet çalışmaları başlatılmıştır. Daha sonra ikinci kez öz değerlendirme yapılmış olup; 10 standarttan 1 tanesinin karşılanmadığı, 3 standartın kısmen karşılandığı tespit edilmiştir. İyileştirme çalışmalarından sonra üçüncü öz değerlendirme yapılmış ve yalnızca 1 standartın kısmen karşılandığı görülmüştür. Evde sağlık hizmetleri öz değerlendirme puanları sırasıyla; 47.2, 72.2 ve son yapılan öz değerlendirme puanı 94.4 olarak tespit edilmiştir. Sonuç: Evde sağlık hizmetlerinde, kalite kültürü oluşturma, öz değerlendirme ve kalite iyileştirme oldukça önemlidir. Sonuç olarak, yaşlanan nüfusla birlikte ülkemizde evde sağlık hizmetlerinin son yıllarda giderek önem kazandığını söyleyebiliriz. Hastanelerin tüm birimlerinde olduğu gibi, evde sağlık hizmetleri sunumunda da kalite standartlarının tam olarak karşılanması için belirlenen dönemlerde hastane yönetimi tarafından öz değerlendirme yapılarak tüm hastaneyi kapsayan kalite iyileştirme politikaları geliştirmeleri önerilmektedir.

Patient Engagement in Home Health: The Role of Health Literacy and “Ask Me Three®”

Health literacy has been identified as a barrier to patient engagement among older adults, especially within the home health care setting. This systematic literature review explores patient engagement; the relationship between patient engagement and health literacy; and finally, best practices for improving patient engagement through health literacy. Various interventions were explored but the “Ask Me Three®” tool created by the Institute for Healthcare Improvement and the National Patient Safety Foundation, was a best practice for improving patient engagement through increased health literacy. This educational intervention is a high-touch, low-cost, process designed to engage patients, and their informal caregivers in their own care through increased communication by asking three important questions: (1) What is my main problem?, (2) What do I need to do?, and (3) Why is it important for me to do this? These questions make the patient engage with their provider to identify their main health problem; what actions need to be taken to improve their health, and why those actions are important. Providers can potentially influence patient’s behavior through engagement and increased health literacy. The “Ask Me Three®” intervention is an example of how increased patient engagement and health literacy can lead to better health outcomes. The “Ask Me Three®” intervention may improve the quality of home health care.

Home Health Care Quality, Its Costs and Implications for Home Health Value-Based Purchasing.

The Home Health Value-based Purchasing (HHVBP) demonstration, incorporating a payment formula designed to incentivize both high-quality care and quality improvement, is expected to become a national program after 2022, when the demonstration ends. This study investigated the relationship between costs and several quality dimensions, to inform HHVBP policy. Using Medicare cost reports, OASIS and Home Health Compare data for 7,673 home health agencies nationally, we estimated cost functions with instrumental variables for quality. The estimated net marginal costs varied by composite quality measure, baseline quality, and agency size. For four of the five composite quality measures, the net marginal cost was negative for low-quality agencies, suggesting that quality improvement was cost saving for this agency type. As the magnitude of the net marginal cost is commensurate with the payment incentive planned for HHVBP, it should be considered when designing the incentives for HHVBP, to maximize their effectiveness.

Quality of home healthcare among Arab countries

Objective:To examine the quality of home healthcare services provided and to systematically review publications concerning the quality of home healthcare in Arab countries.Methods:In 2017, we conducted an online literature search to identify relevant published studies using the following electronic databases: Embase, CINAHL, PubMed, and the Cochrane library. First, we screened the publications according to titles. Second, we evaluated the titles and abstracts of the included publications. Third, we independently reviewed and assessed the full texts of the included publications.After the final selection, we extracted the following information from the full-text articles that met the inclusion criteria: author, year of publication, country, study design, number of participants, participant type, and the main findings.Results:In total, 6 of 214 studies met the inclusion criteria. These 6 studies were published from 3 countries. The country with the most number of studies was Saudi Arabia (4 articles), followed by Jordan (one article) and Iraq (one article). We found that all studies were assessed according to 3 indicators, namely, safety, efficiency, and effectiveness, out of the 6 indicators of quality by the Institute of Medicine.Conclusion:This review shows a clear gap in the literature regarding the quality of home healthcare in Arab countries, emphasizing the need for more studies, particularly quality studies on timely, equitable, and patient-centered care in home healthcare settings.

Sepsis: A Review for Home Healthcare Clinicians.

Sepsis is a life-threatening response to infection that affects over 1.7 million people annually in the United States. Although sepsis can strike healthy and active people of all ages, those at highest risk are older adults, infants, and people with chronic illnesses or an impaired immune system. Many people who had sepsis recover and resume life as it was before. However, others require some level of postdischarge home healthcare. Up to 60% of survivors, particularly of severe sepsis and septic shock, are left with cognitive and/or physical limitations. About one-third of all sepsis survivors and more than 40% of older survivors are rehospitalized within 3 months of the initial sepsis diagnosis, most commonly due to a repeat episode of sepsis or another infection. Quality home healthcare follow-up of sepsis patients is paramount in lowering readmission rates, preventing reoccurrence of sepsis, and assisting patients and families during the postsepsis phase of healthcare.

Caregiver and Provider Experiences of Home Healthcare Quality for Children With Medical Complexity.

Despite a growing population of children with medical complexity, little is known about the current quality of pediatric home healthcare. The objective of this study was to characterize the quality of pediatric home healthcare experienced by primary family caregivers (parents) and healthcare providers of children with medical complexity. Semistructured, in-depth key informant interviews of 20 caregivers and 20 providers were conducted and analyzed for factors affecting home healthcare quality using the Institute of Medicine's quality framework (effective, safe, patient-centered, timely, equitable, and efficient). System complexity, insurance denials, and workforce shortages affected patients' ability to establish and maintain access to home healthcare leading to hospital discharge delays and negative family impacts. When home healthcare was accessible, respondents experienced it as effective in improving patient and family daily life and minimizing use of emergency and hospital services. However, respondents identified a need for more pediatric-specific home healthcare training and increased efficiencies in care plan communication. Overall, home healthcare was not perceived as timely or equitable due to access barriers. This study provides a new conceptual framework representing the relationship between home healthcare quality and outcomes for children with medical complexity for future evaluations of quality improvement, research, and policy initiatives.

Comparing Home Healthcare Quality for Urban and Non-Urban Home Health Agencies in the United States

Home healthcare is post-acute care services provided to homebound patients in home settings, serving mostly older adults. It is important to ensure and improve home healthcare quality everywhere in the United States. This study leveraged data analytics to understand the similarities and differences between the urban and non-urban home health agencies in terms of their quality measures.