Healthcare Quality Improvement Research Articles

Exploring variations in patient safety events across equity-deserving populations

The objective of this analysis was to examine variations in rates of hospital harm (HH), an important indicator of patient safety events, across population subgroups in Canada. We conducted a descriptive study of HH in provinces and territories using three years (2016 to 2018) of CIHI’s Discharge Abstract Database (DAD) linked to the 2016 Canadian Census, also known as Statistics Canada’s Canadian Census Health and Environment Cohorts (CanCHEC). We investigated the influence of sociodemographic variables not generally available in hospital administrative data. We calculated age-standardized rates (ASR) per 100 hospital discharges and 95% confidence intervals for HH, stratified by sex, income (area and individual), racialized group, education, immigration status, language, disability status, social and material deprivation, and geography (urban vs. rural/remote). Despite males experiencing higher rates of harm (ASR 4.36 vs. 4.23), overall females experienced 54% of all HH events, with an average age of 64 (vs age 49 for those discharged without a HH event). For neighbourhood income quintile, the highest rates of HH were observed in the lowest quintile (4.08, 4.04 – 4.11). The rate of HH decreased as neighbourhood income increased. Patients from rural/remote neighbourhoods had lower rates of HH (3.7, 3.66-3.73) than those living in urban neighbourhoods (4.47, 4.44-4.49). Additional equity-stratified results will be presented. Our analysis revealed that marginalized populations were more likely to experience a harmful event during their hospital stay. Measuring and monitoring inequalities in patient safety provides health systems with information to better understand, target, and evaluate healthcare quality improvement initiatives.

Utilizing Human Factors to Improve Surgeons’ Data Access

Improving health care quality has been a focus for human factors practitioners in the past decades. Built on the new computerized information provided by Robot-Assisted Surgery (RAS), we conducted interviews with 21 surgeons to explore how this surgical information can help improve surgeons’ efficiency and proficiency. Almost all the participants we interviewed considered their surgical data access to be limited. In addition, they indicated that insights from surgical data could help improve their efficiency and proficiency. We present our findings in two main categories: the surgeons’ current data access and the tools surgeons use to access surgical data. We also documented what surgical data surgeons need, why they need the data and how the data could help improve surgeons’ efficiency and proficiency. Our findings and proposed designs were incorporated in My Intuitive App designs to implement values identified by our Human Factors analysis.

Stakeholder Perspectives and Experiences of Implementation of Accreditation and the ISO 9001 Programs in Hospitals of Iran: A Qualitative Study

Background: Accreditation and ISO 9001 programs in hospitals are widely adopted for quality control and quality improvement in healthcare. Objectives: The objective of this study is to identify stakeholders’ perspectives and experiences regarding the implementation of accreditation and ISO 9001 programs in hospitals affiliated with the Social Security Organization in Alborz Province, Iran. Methods: In this qualitative study, participants were selected based on purposive sampling. For data collection, semi-structured one-to-one interviews were conducted with hospital staff in different positions (n = 30). All interviews were digitally recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: Based on the analysis, 10 primary themes and 88 subthemes were identified. The 10 primary themes were categorized as experiences, strengths, weaknesses, effective factors, and recommendations for the implementation of accreditation and ISO 9001 programs in hospitals. Proper planning, benchmarking, physician involvement, increased resources, and more training are suggested for the successful implementation of accreditation in hospitals. Additionally, fostering a positive culture, focusing on the executive dimension, changing managerial attitudes, training, and supporting and motivating staff are the most important recommendations for the implementation of the ISO 9001 program. Conclusions: The results provide important insights into the dimensions of implementing accreditation and ISO programs in hospitals, which can be used by health policymakers and managers to improve the implementation of these programs in Iranian hospitals.

Healthcare quality improvement: It's time to update the Donabedian approach with a complex systems perspective.

There is broad consensus that healthcare systems are complex systems, which as a result, face complex problems. From this perspective, quality of care can be conceptualised as an emergent outcome of the healthcare system, that is more than the sum of individual components of care (in terms of inputs and processes), and quality improvement as a complex systems problem. However, traditional approaches, such as Donabedian's structure/process/outcome framework, are rooted in a linear, reductionist perspective, that fails to recognise that quality of care is created in the context of complex healthcare systems, and the many interactions and uncertainties at play that shape quality of care and health outcomes. A paradigm shift is needed from a reductionist to a systems thinking approach if we are to better understand and improve quality of care. Such a shift begins with asking different research questions, situated within the system context, that focus on identifying how interventions may contribute to system improvement, as opposed to seeking to directly link interventions with quality of care outcomes. In contrast to traditional healthcare quality measures focusing on single components of the system in isolation, research needs to explicitly consider quality of care as an emergent system outcome and identify new indicators and methods of assessment that provide insight into how the healthcare system functions as an interconnected whole. It is an opportune moment to harness the energy of the international healthcare quality movement to drive the innovation needed in research and practice to adopt a systems thinking approach.

Is return on investment the appropriate tool for healthcare quality improvement governance?

PurposeIn this article, we outline our views on the appropriateness and utility of Return on Investment (ROI) for the evaluation of the value of healthcare quality improvement (QI) programmes.Design/methodology/approachOur recent research explored the ROI concept and became the genesis of our viewpoint. We reflect on our findings from an extensive research project on the concept of ROI, involving a multidisciplinary global systematic literature review, a qualitative and Delphi study with mental healthcare leaders from the United Kingdom National Health Service. Research participants included board members, clinical directors and QI leaders. Our findings led to our conclusions and interpretation of ROI against the broad QI governance. We discuss our views against the predominant governance frameworks and wider literature.FindingsROI is in-line with top-down control governance frameworks based in politics and economics. However, there is evidence that to be of better utility, a tool for the assessment of the value of QI benefits must include comprehensive benefits that reflect broad monetary and non-monetary benefits. This is in-line with bottom-up and collaborative governance approaches. ROI has several challenges that may limit it as a QI governance tool. This is supported by wider literature on ROI, QI as well as modern governance theories and models. As such, we question whether ROI is the appropriate tool for QI governance. A more pragmatic governance framework that accommodates various healthcare objectives is advised.Practical implicationsThis article highlights some of the challenges in adopting ROI as a QI governance tool. We signal a need for the exploration of a suitable QI governance approach. Particularly, are healthcare leaders to be perceived as “agents”, “stewards” or both. The evidence from our research and wider literature indicates that both are crucial. Better QI governance through an appropriate value assessment tool could improve clarity on QI value, and thus investment allocation decision-making. Constructive discussion about the utility and appropriateness of ROI in the evaluation of healthcare QI programmes may help safeguard investment in effective and efficient health systems.Originality/valueThe article raises awareness of QI governance and encourages discussions about the challenges of using ROI as a tool for healthcare QI governance.

Improving Healthcare Quality with a LHS: From Patient-Generated Health Data to Evidence-Based Recommendations.

One approach to enriching the Learning Health System (LHS) is leveraging vital signs and data from wearable technologies. Blood oxygen, heart rate, respiration rates, and other data collected by wearables (like sleep and exercise patterns) can be used to monitor and predict health conditions. This data is already being collected and could be used to improve healthcare in several ways. Our approach will be health data interoperability with HL7 FHIR (for data exchange between different systems), openEHR (to store researchable data separated from software but connected to ontologies, external terminologies and code sets) and maintain the semantics of data. OpenEHR is a standard that has an important role in modelling processes and clinical decisions. The six pillars of Lifestyle Medicine can be a first attempt to change how patients see their daily decisions, affecting the mid to long-term evolution of their health. Our objective is to develop the first stage of the LHS based on a co-produced personal health recording (CoPHR) built on top of a local LLM that interoperates health data through HL7 FHIR, openEHR, OHDSI and terminologies that can ingest external evidence and produces clinical and personal decision support and, when combined with many other patients, can produce or confirm evidence.

Student Engagement in Patient Safety and Healthcare Quality Improvement: A Brief Educational Approach.

Achieving optimal patient safety (PS) remains a challenge in healthcare. Effective educational methods are critical for improving PS. Innovative teaching tools, like case-based learning, augmented reality, and active learning, can help students better understand and apply PS and healthcare quality improvement (HQI) principles. This study aimed to assess activities and tools implemented to improve PS and HQI education, as well as student engagement, in medical schools. We designed a two-week course for fourth-year medical students at the Autonomous University of Guadalajara, incorporating Fink's taxonomy of significant learning to create engaging activities. The course featured daily synchronous and asynchronous learning, with reinforcement activities using tools, like augmented reality and artificial intelligence. A total of 394 students participated, with their performance in activities and final exam outcomes analyzed using non-parametric tests. Students who passed the final exam scored higher in activities focused on application and reasoning (p = 0.02 and p = 0.018, respectively). Activity 7B, involving problem-solving and decision-making, was perceived as the most impactful. Activity 8A, a case-based learning exercise on incident reporting, received the highest score for perception of exam preparation. This study demonstrates innovative teaching methods and technology to enhance student understanding of PS and HQI, contributing to improved care quality and patient safety. Further research on the long-term impact is needed.

Refocusing on Patient-Centered Outcomes for Quality Improvement in Healthcare

Refocusing on Patient-Centered Outcomes for Quality Improvement in Healthcare

What influences perceptions about the concept of return on investment from healthcare quality improvement programmes? An institutional theory perspective

PurposeThis paper aims to highlight the factors influencing the conceptualisation of return on investment (ROI) from healthcare quality improvement (QI) programmes.Design/methodology/approachIn their previous work, the authors found that the concept of ROI from QI is broad and includes numerous internal and external benefits for organisations. In this paper, the authors developed a framework outlining the factors that influence this conceptualisation of QI-ROI from an institutional theory perspective. The framework is based on the synthesis of their serial studies on the determinants of the concept of ROI from QI. The research was performed from 2020–2023 and involved a global multidisciplinary systematic literature review (N = 68), qualitative interviews (N = 16) and a Delphi study (N = 23). The qualitative and Delphi studies were based on the publicly-funded mental healthcare in UK. Participants included board members, clinical and service directors, as well as QI leaders.FindingsThe authors outline a framework of internal and external institutional forces that influence the conceptualisation of ROI from QI programmes in mental healthcare and similar organisations. Based on these factors, the authors state several conjectures. In doing this, the authors highlight the ambiguities and uncertainties surrounding QI-ROI conceptualisation. These challenge leaders to balance various monetary and non-monetary benefits for organisations and health systems. This explains the broadness of the QI-ROI concept.Originality/valueThe authors developed a framework highlighting the forces underpinning the broad, ambiguous and sometimes uncertain nature of the QI-ROI concept. They raise awareness about dilemmas to be confronted in developing or applying any tool to evaluate the value for money of QI programmes. Specifically, the work highlights the limitations of the ROI methodology as a primary tool in the QI context and the need for a more comprehensive tool.

Developing the Knowledge Translation and Impact Planner (KTIPs): a resource to enhance research translation and impact in health and rehabilitation.

Knowledge translation (KT) is an essential skill to assist health academics to better develop, disseminate, and implement research findings to improve health care quality and impact, but many academics lack knowledge and skills in this area. This study aimed to describe the KT-informed approach used to develop the Knowledge Translation and Impact Planner (KTIPs) to improve the quality of KT planning, and to examine the acceptability of the KTIPs. The process of developing the tool is described, including use of published literature, application of integrated KT, and consultation with end-users (n=18), including university academics, higher degree research (HDR) candidates, and experts in the KT field. The Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) framework was used to categorize strategies used during pilot implementation. The tool includes a comprehensive instructional guide and accompanying template that systematically takes researchers through each step of the KT process: synthesis, exchange, dissemination, and implementation, as well as guidance on planning for impact following effective KT. Academic staff and HDR candidate stakeholders, and comprehensive advice from experts shaped development of the tool. The tool went through three rounds of concurrent feedback with different end-users. End-users confirmed its acceptability, indicating the KTIPs was adaptable, comprehensive, instructional, and facilitated development of KT and impact plans addressing varied KT goals. The KTIPs was acceptable among academic staff and HDR candidates and facilitated the KT and impact planning process. The KTIPs is freely available and is designed to be navigated, completed, and saved electronically to facilitate implementation of developed plans. http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A253.

Development and implementation of evidence-based, nurse-leading early warning model and healthcare quality improvement project for transplant-associated thrombotic microangiopathy: a mixed-methods, before-and-after study

ObjectiveThe early identification and diagnosis of transplant-associated thrombotic microangiopathy (TA-TMA) are essential yet difficult in patients underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). To develop an evidence-based, nurse-leading early warning model for TA-TMA, and implement the healthcare quality review and improvement project.MethodsThis study was a mixed-methods, before-and-after study. The early warning model was developed based on quality evidence from literature search. The healthcare quality review and improvement project mainly included baseline investigation of nurse, improvement action and effectiveness evaluation. The awareness and knowledge of early parameter of TA-TMA among nurses and the prognosis of patients underwent HSCT were compared before and after the improvement.ResultsA total of 1 guideline, 1 evidence synthesis, 4 expert consensuses, 10 literature reviews, 2 diagnostic studies, and 9 case series were included in the best evidence. The early warning model including warning period, high-risk characteristics and early manifestation of TA-TMA was developed. The improvement action, including staff training and assessment, suspected TA-TMA identification and patient education, was implemented. The awareness and knowledge rate of early parameter of TA-TMA among nurses significantly improved after improvement action (100% vs. 26.7%, P < 0.001). The incidence of TA-TMA was similar among patients underwent HSCT before and after improvement action (2.8% vs. 1.2%, P = 0.643), while no fall event occurred after improvement action (0 vs. 1.2%, P < 0.001).ConclusionThe evidence-based early warning model and healthcare quality improvement project could enhance the awareness and knowledge of TA-TMA among healthcare providers and might improve the prognosis of patients diagnosed with TA-TMA.

The contribution of logistics to improving health care quality: a case study approach

ABSTRACT This research in a managerial vision tries to understand how inter-organisational logistical collaboration on physical (drugs, consumables, medical equipment and kits) and information flows contributes to improving the quality of care. The analysis of the content of the semi-structured interviews allowed us to discuss the two research proposals resulting from the literature review and their level of acceptance. The results show that the collaboration between the operators of the two supply chains, internal and external supply chains, contributes to improving care but under certain conditions. Recommendations have been made to many entities to improve logistical practices and the quality of care provided to patients. In doing so, our research thus contributes to compiling literature on hospital logistics and paves the way for more future research in the field of logistics in healthcare establishments.

Using Behavioral Insights to Strengthen Strategies for Change. Practical Applications for Quality Improvement in Healthcare.

For over 30 years, quality improvement (QI) methods have been used as a means of increasing the quality and safety of healthcare services, but with mixed success. One explanation highlighted in the literature for this outcome is the overemphasis on technical elements of change, and a failure to fully appreciate the human side of change. Behavioral insights (BI) is an approach that utilizes knowledge and tools from a broad range of scientific disciplines, such as neuroscience and behavioral psychology, to support behavior change. The aim of this paper is to explore the possibility of supplementing QI methods with tools and understanding from BI. We outline a practical case that involved applying aspects BI methods into a QI program aimed at reducing the use of intravenous antibiotics in patients accessing services at a busy university hospital in Copenhagen, Denmark. We exemplify how to use BI tools to guide the analysis of staff behaviors during standard clinical processes and develop targeted interventions aimed at increasing actions and behaviors more aligned to best clinical practice. Outcomes suggest that it is possible to combine the models and methods from BI and QI in a way that is helpful in focusing attention on the human side of change when developing strategies for change. Potential psychological barriers identified from the analysis included the following: 'default inertia,' 'decision complexity,' 'risk aversion,' and biases related to confidence, confirmation, and omission. Future quality improvement projects could benefit from integrating models and tools from BI to guide and support behavior change.

The Interplay Between Healthcare Quality Improvement, Temporality, and Materiality

The Interplay Between Healthcare Quality Improvement, Temporality, and Materiality

Improving Emergency Skills: Training Program at Medono Health Center, Pekalongan City

First aid is crucial and essential for providing emergency assistance. Early treatment of injured individuals at home can significantly reduce morbidity and mortality rates. Community health center staff, as primary service providers to the community, must be proficient in first aid since emergencies can happen anytime and anywhere. This study assessed the effectiveness of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) training at the Medono Community Health Center in enhancing the knowledge and skills of healthcare workers. Initially, 76.2% of participants had inadequate knowledge about CPR, but after training, 86% showed a substantial improvement in knowledge. Furthermore, the training reduced errors in using the Bag Valve Mask (BVM) and performing chest compressions. Mistakes in ventilation decreased after proper instruction, and errors in compression positioning dropped from 57.8% to nearly zero. These findings highlight the critical role of CPR training in enhancing the preparedness and competence of healthcare workers in emergencies. The Medono Health Center is dedicated to regularly conducting CPR training to ensure the continuous improvement of healthcare quality and patient safety.

Suicide in individuals with eating disorders who had sought mental health treatment in England: a national retrospective cohort study

Although studies have suggested a high risk of suicide in people with eating disorders, most studies have focused on suicidal ideation and attempts. There is little research on the characteristics of people with eating disorders who died by suicide, nor investigation of trends over time. We aimed to compare the characteristics of patients with eating disorders who died by suicide versus patients with other mental health diagnoses who died by suicide in England and to examine the trends in rates. In this national retrospective cohort study, data on all people (aged ≥10 years) who died by suicide in England, UK, between Jan 1, 1997, and Dec 31, 2021, while under the care (within the previous 12 months) of mental health services were obtained from the National Confidential Inquiry into Suicide and Safety in Mental Health (NCISH), in which clinical information is collected via a questionnaire completed by the mental health professional responsible for the patient's care. Incidence of suicide in, and demographic, clinical, and treatment characteristics of, patients with a diagnosis of eating disorder (as recorded by the treating clinician) who died by suicide were compared with patients with other mental health diagnoses who died by suicide within the same timeframe using univariable logistic regression analysis. People with related lived experience were involved in the study design, implementation, interpretation, and writing of the manuscript. Of 119 446 people for whom NCISH were notified of dying by suicide in England, 30 795 were under the recent care of mental health services, of whom 30 246 had known diagnoses and were included in analyses. Of these individuals, 10 373 (34%) were female and 19 873 (66%) were male; 2236 (8%) were of minority ethnicity; 382 (1%) had a diagnosis of eating disorder and 29 864 (99%) had another mental health diagnosis. Compared with patients with other mental health diagnoses who died by suicide, patients with eating disorders were younger (median age 33 years [range 15-90] vs 45 years [10-100]), more often female (343 [90%] female and 39 [10%] male in the eating disorders group; 10 030 [34%] female and 19 834 [66%] male in the other diagnoses group), and less likely to have evidence of conventional risk factors for suicide such as living alone (odds ratio [OR] 0·68, 95% CI 0·55-0·84). 22 (6%) of 382 were from a minority ethnic group. Patients with an eating disorder were characterised by a greater clinical complexity (eg, self-harm [OR 2·31, 95% CI 1·78-3·00], comorbidity [9·79, 6·81-14·1], and longer duration of illness [1·95, 1·56-2·43]), and were more likely to have died following overdoses (2·00, 1·62-2·45) than patients with other diagnoses. Childhood abuse (52 [37%] of 140) and domestic violence (18 [20%] of 91) were common in patients with eating disorders. Similar to patients with other diagnoses, most (244 [75%] of 326) of those with eating disorders who died by suicide were rated as low risk by clinicians at last contact. The number of suicide deaths in patients with eating disorders rose between 1997 and 2021 (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1·03, 95% CI 1·02-1·05; p<0·0001), but rates fell when accounting for the greater number of patients entering mental health services (IRR 0·97, 0·95-1·00; p=0·033). This study was focused on people who sought help from mental health services. It did not consider subtypes of eating disorders or include a control group, but it does highlight possible areas for intervention. The comprehensive provision of evidence-based treatment for eating disorders and underlying conditions to address the clinical complexity in these patients might help to reduce suicide. Recognising limitations in clinical risk assessment, addressing early life experiences and current adversities, and appropriate prescribing might also be of benefit. Suicide prevention must remain a priority for eating disorder services and mental health care more widely. The Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership.

A qualitative study of the barriers and facilitators impacting the implementation of a quality improvement program for emergency departments: SurgeCon

BackgroundThe implementation of intervention programs in Emergency Departments (EDs) is often fraught with complications due to the inherent complexity of the environment. Hence, the exploration and identification of barriers and facilitators prior to an implementation is imperative to formulate context-specific strategies to ensure the tenability of the intervention.ObjectivesIn assessing the context of four EDs prior to the implementation of SurgeCon, a quality improvement program for ED efficiency and patient satisfaction, this study identifies and explores the barriers and facilitators to successful implementation from the perspective of the healthcare providers, patients, researchers, and decision-makers involved in the implementation.SettingsTwo rural and two urban Canadian EDs with 24/7 on-site physician support.MethodsData were collected prior to the implementation of SurgeCon, by means of qualitative and quantitative methods consisting of semi-structured interviews with 31 clinicians (e.g., physicians, nurses, and managers), telephone surveys with 341 patients, and structured observations from four EDs. The interpretive description approach was utilized to analyze the data gathered from interviews, open-ended questions of the survey, and structured observations.ResultsA set of five facilitator-barrier pairs were extracted. These key facilitator-barrier pairs were: (1) management and leadership, (2) available resources, (3) communications and networks across the organization, (4) previous intervention experiences, and (5) need for change.ConclusionImproving our understanding of the barriers and facilitators that may impact the implementation of a healthcare quality improvement intervention is of paramount importance. This study underscores the significance of identifing the barriers and facilitators of implementating an ED quality improvement program and developing strategies to overcome the barriers and enhance the facilitators for a successful implementations. We propose a set of strategies for hospitals when implementing such interventions, these include: staff training, champion selection, communicating the value of the intervention, promoting active engagement of ED staff, assigning data recording responsibilities, and requiring capacity analysis.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov. NCT04789902. 10/03/2021.

The Steep Decline in Reporting to the National Practioner Data Bank, and a Look at Reporting Levels from “Plaintiff-Favorable” and “Defendant-Favorable” States

The establishment of the National Practitioner Data Bank (NPDB) was authorized in the Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986, and it mandated a federal database to collect information related to adverse actions initially against just physicians and dentists throughout the United States, including payments from malpractice lawsuits, restrictions on clinical privileges by hospitals, and medical licensure limitations and revocations by state licensing boards. The aggregate data reports made by this federal data bank began in 1991. The reporting level for the first ten years remained relatively stable in the nationwide range of 16,000 to 18,000 reports per year, but then a steady decline occurred over the second and third decades to under 8,000 reports per year by the year 2021. The researchers in this study explored a theory that might explain at least part of the drop in the states’ reporting levels. That is, states that could be called “Plaintiff-Favorable” (Arizona, Kentucky, New York, Pennsylvania, and Washington) would demonstrate a lesser rate of decline or even an increase in the reporting levels, and states that could be characterized as “Defendant-Favorable” (California, Michigan, Nevada, North Carolina, and Texas) would demonstrate a comparatively greater rate of decline in the reporting levels. The decline in reporting to the NPDB proved fairly consistent for both Plaintiff-Favorable and Defendant-Favorable states. The larger question as to why there occurred an overall negative trend in reporting to the NPDB across the United States during the second and third decades remains an intriguing area for future exploration.

Evidence-Based Practice Quality Improvement Critical Appraisal Tool.

Optimal quality improvement in health care is based on research and other types of evidence. Critical appraisal of evidence is a fundamental component of evidence-based practice (EBP) and is also needed to evaluate the quality of quality improvement (QI) projects. Currently available EBP or QI critical appraisal tools can be challenging for students learning the critical appraisal process and for practicing clinicians who desire access to a standardized EBPQI approach to inform health care decision-making. The currently available tools are incomplete, too brief, or too complicated for ease of use in education and practice. This article introduces the first combined EBP and QI (EBPQI) critical appraisal tool, which is aligned with the new EBPQI mountain model. This newly developed appraisal tool may be used in appraising evidence for an EBPQI initiative and to appraise the quality of disseminated EBPQI.

Quality improvement development in Swedish healthcare and welfare services

PurposeQuality improvement has developed and spread, and today, all Swedish Regions emphasize that their strategies are based on systematic improvement. This paper aims to describe and illuminate the development of Quality Improvement (QI) in Swedish healthcare and welfare organizations by using publications in a Swedish context.Design/methodology/approachThe overview synthesis is inspired by a scoping literature review approach of relevant literature. All publications relevant to Swedish healthcare and welfare settings between 1992 until 2020 were included.FindingsIn all, 213 papers, 29 books and chapters and 34 dissertations related to QI and research in Swedish healthcare and welfare context were identified. From 2011 to 2020, the publication rate increased rapidly. Six different focus areas emerged: systematic and value-creating improvement work; collaboration between organizations and healthcare providers; use of improvement methods and (theoretical) models; leadership and learning; measurements, quality registers and follow-up; and involvement and patient safety. Further QI development in Swedish healthcare and welfare points to an increased importance of collaboration between organizations and coproduction with beneficiaries for the healthcare and welfare services.Originality/valueThis paper is one of the first to describe and illuminate the QI development in the healthcare and welfare sector in a country. The trajectory also points to a need for coproduction to handle future challenges.