Quality-adjusted Time Without Symptoms Or Toxicity Research Articles

Quality-adjusted time without symptoms or toxicity analysis of interferon maintenance in multiple myeloma.

In a randomized trial conducted by the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group (NCIC CTG), interferon alpha-2b (IFN) maintenance therapy (2 mU/m2 subcutaneously three times per week) after successful induction with melphalan and prednisone was found to prolong time to progression in patients with multiple myeloma. A favorable effect on survival was also present, but this difference was of borderline significance. However, IFN toxicity was a concern. To evaluate the trade-off between the clinical benefits of IFN and the associated toxicity, we applied the method of quality-adjusted time without symptoms or toxicity (Q-TWiST). Three clinical health states were defined in this analysis: time with toxicity (TOX), time without disease relapse or toxicity (TWiST), and time following disease relapse (REL). Toxicity information for IFN had been collected using patient-completed diaries so the actual duration of each adverse event could be determined. The health states TOX and REL were weighted using utility scores to account for a possible decrement in quality of life, a weighted sum of the health state durations is used as a measure of quality-adjusted time. The health state durations were calculated at 72 months median follow-up. Patients in the IFN group gained an average of 9.8 months without disease relapse (P = .001) and 5.8 months of overall survival (P = .074) versus the control group. However, the IFN group suffered an average of 4.1 months of moderate or worse toxicity (P < .001). The clinical benefits of IFN outweigh the negative effects associated with treatment toxicity for a wide range of plausible utilities.

Advanced HIV Infection Treated with Zidovudine Monotherapy: Lifetime Values of Absolute Cost—Effectiveness as a Pharmacoeconomic Reference for Future Studies Evaluating Antiretroviral Combination Treatments

This study was undertaken to evaluate the cost and the effectiveness of zidovudine monotherapy in patients with advanced HIV infection and to derive preliminary data on the cost-effectiveness of the triple treatment with saquinavir plus zalcitabine plus zidovudine compared with zidovudine alone. We used a combined method of survival analysis utilizing both the quality-adjusted time without symptoms or toxicity (Q-TWIST) method and the Gompertz approach. This combined method was applied to assess the absolute cost-effectiveness and cost-utility ratios of zidovudine monotherapy and to perform a preliminary incremental cost-effectiveness comparison of saquinavir plus zalcitabine plus zidovudine versus zidovudine alone. The clinical material used in our study was derived from two reports on the treatment of advanced HIV infection. Data of lifetime costs of HIV infection were obtained from published information. In patients with advanced HIV infection treated with zidovudine monotherapy, lifetime survival was 252.1 discounted person-years per 100 patients. Using an average lifetime cost of $93,000 (discounted) per individual, the absolute ratio of cost-effectiveness for zidovudine monotherapy was $36,980 per life-year, while the absolute cost-utility ratio was $47,112 per quality-adjusted life-year. In the comparative analysis of saquinavir plus zalcitabine plus zidovudine versus zidovudine alone, our calculations showed that the administration of the triple treatment can have an "average" cost-effectiveness, provided that mean lifetime survival per patient (discounted) is improved to at least 3.68 years (with an average survival gain of at least 14 mo per patient). The values of absolute cost-effectiveness and cost-utility ratios for zidovudine monotherapy are a useful reference point for further pharmacoeconomic studies in the area of antiretroviral drugs.

Re: A Quality-Adjusted Time Without Symptoms or Toxicity (Q-TWiST) Analysis of Adjuvant Radiation Therapy and Chemotherapy for Resectable Rectal Cancer

Re: A Quality-Adjusted Time Without Symptoms or Toxicity (Q-TWiST) Analysis of Adjuvant Radiation Therapy and Chemotherapy for Resectable Rectal Cancer

Adjuvant chemotherapy plus tamoxifen compared with tamoxifen alone for postmenopausal breast cancer: meta-analysis of quality-adjusted survival

Summary Background Adjuvant tamoxifen for early breast cancer provides an improvement in relapse-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS), especially for older women. We carried out a meta-analysis to find out whether the benefit of adding chemotherapy to tamoxifen outweighs its costs in terms of toxic effects for postmenopausal patients. Methods The meta-analysis of quality-adjusted survival was based on data from 3920 patients aged 50 years or older with node-positive breast cancer randomly assigned in nine trials that compared combination chemotherapy plus tamoxifen with tamoxifen alone. The nine trials were included in the worldwide overview conducted by the early breast cancer trialists' collaborative group (EBCTCG). The quality-adjusted time without symptoms or toxicity (Q-TWiST) method was used to provide treatment comparisons incorporating differences in quality of life associated with subjective toxic effects of treatment and symptoms of disease relapse. Findings Within 7 years of follow-up the modest benefit of increased RFS and OS for patients who received chemotherapy just balanced the costs in terms of acute toxic side-effects. Chemotherapy-treated patients gained an average of 5·4 months of RFS and 2 months of OS (neither statistically significant), but had to receive cytotoxic treatment for between 2 and 24 months to achieve these gains. No values of preference weights for time spent undergoing chemotherapy and time after relapse gave significantly more Q-TWiST with chemotherapy plus tamoxifen than with tamoxifen alone. Interpretation Within 7 years of follow-up, adjuvant chemoendocrine therapy did not provide more quality-adjusted survival time than tamoxifen alone for women aged 50 years or older with node-positive breast cancer. Better selection and administration of chemotherapy regimen, different scheduling of chemotherapy and tamoxifen, and appropriate use of patient and tumour characteristics may increase the therapeutic advantage of the combination.