Although it is acknowledged that the spatial scale of sampling and experimentation is important in assessing the degree of stability of a community, multiple scales are rarely incorporated into the same study. We compared the persistence and resilience of a temperate blennioid fish guild at three scales spanning an order of magnitude. Replicate permanent square quadrats of three sizes (4 m2, 25 m2, 100 m2) were delimited within contiguous tracts of reef in two habitats: broken reef and macroalgal forest. Two forms of disturbance were applied to the treatment quadrats. Direct disturbance (fish removal) was applied to treatments in the broken reef habitat. Indirect disturbance (macroalgal removal) was applied to treatments in the macroalgal forest. Both experiments identified several scale-dependent effects. Large quadrats were less variable than smaller quadrats, probably due to reduced edge effects due to movement of fish in and out of the quadrats. The smallest quadrats did not adequately represent the available substratum types within the reef zone. This interacted with species-specific behavioral factors such as mobility and habitat association to consistently bias the blennioid composition within the smallest quadrats toward dominance of the most sedentary blennioid species. Fish responded to disturbance in different ways depending on the stage of their life cycle. Adult fish responded at scales within their motility range of only a few meters. In contrast, newly settling fish responded to the habitat at larger scales. Quadrat size also determined which assemblage dynamics could be measured. Within-year changes in guild composition due to species-specific settlement timing and survivorship could be measured only at larger scales. We conclude that different scales of monitoring and manipulation will determine what can be perceived by the researcher as well as how the organism will respond to disturbance.
Read full abstract