It was investigated, whether the selective induction of epoxide hydratase by trans-stilbene oxide (TSO) represents a general phenomenon or is confined to the liver of male rats where it was discovered. Therefore the effect of treatment with TSO on epoxide hydratase and benzo(a)pyrene mono-oxygenase activities were investigated in other organs (kidney, lung, skin, testis), other species (mice, hamsters) and also in female rats. In female rat livers the effect of TSO on the measured enzyme activities was very similar to that found in the male rat liver, i.e. a large induction of epoxide hydratase activity to 300–400 per cent of controls without affecting the benzo(a)pyrene monooxygenase activity. The potency of TSO to induce liver epoxide hydratase activity expressed as per cent of controls was 350:180:140 in rat, mouse and hamster, respectively. Selective induction of epoxide hydratase was found in rat and hamster liver, but not in the mouse liver, where benzo(a)pyrene monooxygenase activity was induced to about the same extent as the epoxide hydratase activity. The only extrahepatie organ in which an increased epoxide hydratase activity was found after TSO treatment was the rat kidney. Subcutaneous and topical treatment with TSO for 12 and 10 days respectively did not induce rat skin epoxide hydratase activity, instead a decrease of the enzyme activity to about 70 per cent ofthat found in control animals was found. Thus, TSO which was demonstrated to be a selective inducer of epoxide hydratase in rat liver can be utilized so far only in a limited number of carcinogenicity test systems, since it failed to induce the skin epoxide hydratase activity, which would have been an excellent tool to study directly the role of epoxide hydratase in the mechanism of skin tumor formation caused by polycyclic hydrocarbons. Interestingly, the epoxide hydratase of the hamster, investigated for the first time in this study, proved quite different from that of rat and mouse in that it hydrated styrene oxide remarkably faster than benzo(a)pyrene 4,5-oxide. This was true for all organs investigated. Also, the organ distribution of epoxide hydratase proved to be very different from that in rat and mouse. In the mouse the activity (with benzo(a)pyrene 4,5-oxide as substrate) was amongst all organs investigated highest in the testis (2.5 fold as compared to liver) but in the hamster the activity was more than 100 fold lower in testis as compared to liver. On the other hand, the activity in kidney was about 50 fold higher in hamster as compared to mouse.