Objective: The objective of the present study is to carry out a systematic review of the literature regarding quantitative models for assessing supply risks. Theoretical Framework: Organizations and their supply chains are increasingly exposed to risks. Given the uncertainties of the business environment, the occurrence of adverse events may result in the interruption of supply in these chains, causing disruption and losses. The development of decision-making models to support risk assessment helps prevent supply discontinuity and can contribute to increasing the robustness of supply chains. Method: Aiming to map quantitative models to support supply risk assessment, the systematic literature review was carried out based on the PRISMA method. Seven factors were considered to classify the selected studies, namely: year of publication, purpose of risk assessment, technique(s) used, criteria, types of input data, support for group decisions and application sector. Results and Discussion: It was found that most of the techniques used are aimed at environments of uncertainty and group decision-making processes. There was also a predominance of applications in companies in the automotive industry and the focus on risk assessment for supplier selection. The most frequent decision technique was AHP. Research Implications: In addition to mapping the state of the art on this topic, some opportunities for future studies were identified in order to assist managers and researchers interested in developing new decision-making models for assessing supply risks. Originality/Value: Based on the bibliographical research carried out, it can be stated that this is the first study focused on mapping decision-making models for assessing supply risks. This study complements previous systematic reviews on risk management in supply chains and can be valuable for the development of tools aimed at mitigating supply risks.
Read full abstract